is given variously by different authors: fi al-Hikma (as in Ibn KathÄ«r and HÄji. KhÄlifah); fi Ilm ... refuting the falÄsifa and mutakallimÅ«n in his Dar? Ta Ärud al-Aql wa ...
! Syamsuddin Arif
I. Introduction
I
n his classic essay published in 1951, Ignaz Goldziher made a strong case for the negative attitude of orthodox Muslim scholars towards the so-called ancient
w ;), which include philosophy and logic, citing among ' 0R
' 1 Goldziher’s conclusion and the assumptions upon which it is based have been called into question recently by Sonja 6' 8 J5' @
C 2 * ¿ 5'(!3$"_ 3
\ 0P*D 3_!23$ ; ] B)' !3!$ !> 3!2#$ 2 ? ' ? ) J j 0O*' 6'& !#_$ !!> 7x)w!2#$'P? ( /;)1@6'&!3$33!> O+ !!22$ ? ('? )w # 6'&!#$ , 2"_> /x#!2$ = @/)CJ@w wwR '3 5' !##$ # # "3_!>w00 O'##_!"#2$ "?
!? !_ 6'&@)!$ !__!> [&3!!__$ { / '%? ) w 0w O _ B)' !#$ !!> C8'0w ? 32!__$G %4 # B)'!!2>''6rut, !#!$ !"_"3> 9(''#_!_#$ != ] !2 5'
$
2#
09w * ' 33!!!3# R * ' + * * 6' 8 FE' %) !#""> C J w 0=\ 0 F % ; @ ?? 5' !$2#!3>J0J FC)0R ' & (/ ( % P 2% , ? 2% %3 5' 22$ !32
9 &' ' (' *'(' '' ( 0R &' B ' & 0,0U w0&+ O' [& 'F09w '+)F09( B *')'& & in any case the surname refers to a certain Arab tribe, although it does not necessarily imply that he was of Arab descent, as it could merely suggest that his ancestor was a client or ' ( ' ' * 6 ' ( '' ' ' 9w' ' 9(0w 32!!$
( /)w0@ U) B)'!"$3# !"""> 0' G// % %/ ( /" 5' !"3#$ !## !"3 #
/(' & ' '+ * ' '
' O+ 0W * *'0R students, assign the year 551 AH ' 0RE' +0[ \%, !!$ '33*' 00J? ($
% % ' (%, )JP4 8 2 '= !$!_>W 0 @8 #3!""$2 ? { / B
/ , 2_> 9('' !=, 2_> 0 w , 2_ (0R * & & ' 0J * 'C 8&' [&22!22"$
2
? (
* & '' w8&' , 33!!$! It was &' ( ) ' 0R ' ' 9& ' from rigorous legal training, he managed to study philosophy and logic, alleg)& ' 5' P* ' 32!! *'' ') & &'*'0J?3#!!!$11 But a )'' ) '5' *'* %* ))' 0R ' ' ' )& % ' + *(6& &
& ' & &' ' +) & )& of heresy ( ' % ) and intellectual corruption ( $ < ?? ), of upholding the doctrine of ' O' "? !? , !_! 13
!_
' ( C 0 % ;" 2$' '(&) ( 0 *0 % ', (; 0[ \ 9 +'D$>%
9 +'D$ ' , !> C88 O O 5$ @ Ã '
(% @/ J * 2 vols &!_!$!# #3> w: 06($ % 2 ? ' @ Ã 2 &!_3$!"# "2#>06( \ ?? '% * (; ; %
% , 2 vols & !3!33$ ##> w7' @O'= ; % , 15 vols 56' + F / G 2 = !"#_2$ 393, and its 88 , " = !_"_$ #>CJ0 w % ; @ ?? 5' !$#!">J0JFC)0R (/ ( % P 2%
, ? 2% %)0J3 5' 22$""_
2!
? (
' %' 0R ' ' '* '+ & as the (/ (9C ( 9)))#2!"2$ * '+ '?& )?& ( ' } whilst criticizing and refuting the and in his 2 ; ' '( ! ! Although it must have originally comprised several volumes, as mentioned by al[ \ C88O ) ' & * '+' % ) (9 &' ( & '* ' ' '') 06' 6'& )6' + 19 w| 0Jw $2 but '* ' :' 7 ' )='')4''5 J_26$ ) '& ) &) * '+
'' ' * '* '+ 0R 2 8 G " ( ! " % B ] ) J @/ ; ) * '+ ( ) ) ) ' 0R 8, a clear ) ') '& ) & ' )0R & & 0[ \ 0W 6&C88O gives a different subtitle, namely % ', (; (U 7 '& ) &' ) ' & ?& & ' ) ' ( ,&D( &' ( ' * 32!! * ' ( w='')J_"$ & B *' * ( '
' '') also his ,) ,?? 2!!#
2!
? (
for one’s well-being in this world and in the Afterlife, the family matters, the necessity of government, popular obedience, and morality — all this is not discussed )0RB *'0R & &
on the possibility of miracles and the controversy surrounding the status of the
&''()(&
+ ! 9' ( ( ' ') &( ) * & ,' ( ' &' & ?& *
' ' *' ( & 0R 2 ; B ; and ! " it is misleading to characterize the period in question as that ( > ')
+ & * &' ( ( 0 ' %) &(0R &' %)' & ( * '+ 0R+& % & '?& )* ' 9 ( )' ' ( ''
' & ' &( &J& * ' * ) 31 / '& ' ) '(& 0R* ' ' * '& ) ( ' ( '
()6& ' ( D0R ) * (' ?& &(( ( ? ;% is the only & >0R '*& ' +' @' ) *' + ' ' &' ** ') * , ) & '* &' 0R * '+ )') ( ) '+ ' , , P ? ?
31
See (
\ ) ( , + G G !* 8/ 8/ * ÂÂÂ)PP