1. Introduction 2. Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

46 downloads 0 Views 161KB Size Report
We give a simple direct proof of the Fermat's last theorem. 1. Introduction. Around 1637, Pierre de Fermat conjectured, in the most famous mathematical marginal ...
A MARGINAL PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

MANGATIANA A. ROBDERA

Abstract. We give a simple direct proof of the Fermat's last theorem.

1.

Introduction

Around 1637, Pierre de Fermat conjectured, in the most famous mathematical marginal note, that the equation

xn + y n = z n has no solutions if n > 2 and if x, y , and z are required to be positive integers. Fermat wrote another marginal note that can be used to give a quick proof for the case n = 4 [1]. In 1753, Lenohard Euler gave a proof for the exponent n = 3 [1]. After 358 years of eorts and attempts by several mathematicians, the rst proof agreed

upon as successful was released in 1994 by Andrew Wiles and formally published in 1995 [1]. However, Wiles' proof was extremely long and using highly complex mathematical developments, leaving the question as to whether a direct proof using only elementary algebras can be given. The purpose of this note is to present one such a proof. 2.

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

Given a positive integer n, a triple (x, y, z) of positive integers satisfying the equation (2.1)

xn + y n = z n

is called a Pythagorean Theorem 1.

triple

of degree n. The Fermat's

There is no Pythagorean triple of degree

Last Theorem

states that

n > 2.

We rst observes that since all positive integers can be reduced to a multiple of prime numbers, it is necessary to prove Fermat's Last Theorem for all odd prime numbers n. We also observe that if (x, y, z) is a Pythagorean  triple and if d > 1 divides each of x, y, z , then xd , yd , dz is also a Pythagorean triple. In what follows, we x an odd prime number n and we assume that x, y , and z are relatively prime and form a Pythagorean triple of degree n. Then x and y cannot be both even. We are therefore left to discuss two cases. Case 1: Both x and y are odd positive integers. n In such a case, z must be even. Let hP = z − x. Since z n = xn + y n < (x + y) , we infer that h < y . Equation (2.1) n n is then equivalent to xn + y n = xn + p=1 p xn−p hp . From which, we obtain Proof.

(2.2)

n

y =

n   X n p=1

p

xn−p hp .

Thus y , and hence y , is divisible by h. We have a contradiction since then the left-hand side of (2.2) is divisible by hn (n > 2) while its right-hand side is not divisible by h2 : indeed, after division by h the right-hand side of (2.2) n

2010 Mathematics Subject Classication. 11A-99. Key words and phrases. Fermat's last theorem.

1

A MARGINAL PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

2

becomes n   n   X X n n−p p−1 n n−p p−1 x h = nxn−1 + x h ; p p p=1 p=2

(2.3)

xn−p hp−1 is not divisible by h because all of its terms is a mutiple of h except the rst one: nxn−1 . Case 2: Only one of the positive integers x and y is odd. Switching, if necessary the role of x and y , we assume that x is odd and y is even. Then z must be odd. We write z = x + 2h γ (respectively y = 2k β ) where h (respectively k ) is a positive integer and γ (respectivelyβ ) is an odd Pn

p=1

n p



positive integer. Then (2.1) can be written as

xn + 2kn β n = xn +

n   X n

p

p=1

2hp xn−p γ p ,

or equivalently n   X n hp n−p p 2 β = γ . 2 x p p=1

(2.4)

kn n

If kn < h, we divide both sides of (2.4) by 2kn . We obtain (2.5)

n

β =

n   X n p=1

p

2hp−kn xn−p γ p .

This is not possible since the left-hand side of (2.5) is odd while its right-hand side is even. If kn > h, we divide both sides of (2.4) by 2h . We obtain (2.6)

2kn−h β n = nxn−1 γ +

n   X n

p

p=2

2h(p−1) xn−p γ p .

This is not possible since the left-hand side of (2.6) is even while its right-hand side is odd. If h = kn, we divide both sides of (2.4) by 2h . We obtain (2.7)

n

n−1

β = nx

n   X n h(p−1) n−p p γ+ 2 x γ . p p=2

Since n > 2, we can write (2.7) in the following equivalent form (2.8)

β n − γ n − nxn−1 γ =

n−1 X p=2

 n h(p−1) n−p p 2 x γ . p

Again, we arrive at another contradiction since the left-hand side of (2.8) is odd while its right-hand side is even. The proof is complete.  References [1] Wiles, A.,

Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's last theorem. Annals of Mathematics. 1995;141(3):443-551.

Department of Mathematics, University of Botswana, 4775 Notwane Road, Gaborone, Botswana

Email address : [email protected]