3D CAD

59 downloads 9713 Views 2MB Size Report
Nov 11, 2014 ... 3D PMI. No Paper. No Drawings. Less CAD. Less Cost. 2D Electronic ... MBD approved for Gulfstream G650 and Boeing 787. ❑ Other aircraft ...
Productivity, Interoperability, Reliability

Standards and the Model Based Manufacturing Enterprise MUSEIC IMI Symposium - November 10-11, 2014 Don Hemmelgarn - ITI

Introductions International TechneGroup Inc. (ITI)  Private company headquartered in Cincinnati since 1983  Development offices in the United States, England, Israel and India  Engineering software and services

 PLM system integration & migration solutions  CAD/CAM/CAE interoperability solutions

Don Hemmelgarn  30+ years in Engineering Software business  President, ITI TranscenData  PDES Inc. Executive Board member

2

ITI Customers

3

Model Based Enterprise

4

The Digital Product Model Evolution 2D Drawing 1781

2D CAD

1970

3D CAD 1980

1990

DMU 2000 2000

MBE 2015

2D Paper 2D Paper Drawing 2D Paper Drawing Drawing 2D Electronic Drawing

3D CAD Model

3D CAD Model

3D CAD Model & PMI

3D Lightweight Geometry, e.g. JT, 3D PDF

3D Lightweight Model include 3D PMI

2D Paper 2D Paper Drawing 2D Paper Drawing Drawing 2D Electronic Drawing

2D Paper 2D Paper Drawing 2D Paper Drawing Drawings

5

2D Electronic Drawings

No Paper No Drawings Less CAD Less Cost

The Rationale for 3D MBD Current design process: 2D Drawing

3D Model

3D Model based design process: 3D Model with PMI

Re-creation

3D Part 2D QA Process

3D Part

3D QA process Re-creation

3D Product

3D Product

Barriers to the Model-Based Enterprise (MBE) Business Limited capital expense budgets

Incomplete CAx system functionality

Legacy product reuse vs. new product design

Digital data variation

Resistance to change

7

Technical

Lagging standards and regulations

MBE PMI Validation Test Case Example Test Case

CATIA Model

Creo Model

NX Model

9

Types of Digital Data Variation 1. Master Design

Interpretation  Confusing structure

Can it be manufactured?

 Inconsistent data  Unrealistic features

2. Data Translation/Migration CAD A to CAD B or CAD A Rev 1 to Rev 2

Is it equivalent?

 Data loss  Degradation  Unacceptable change

3. Engineering Revision  Unintentional change  Undocumented change

10

Is it correct and clear?

Master Design Geometry Defect Examples

Blocked Hole

Crack

Void

11

Thin Volume

Lagging Standards & Regulations – Not for long! International Data Modeling Standards  ISO 14306:2012

JT with Parasolid

 ISO 10303-242 (CD)

STEP AP242

 ISO 14739-1 (FDIS)

3D PDF with PRC

FAA Aircraft Type Certification  MBD approved for Gulfstream G650 and Boeing 787  Other aircraft programs pending

Department of Defense Regulations  MIL-STD-31000 Revision A  Enables Technical Data Package (TDP)

to be specified as 3D with PMI

12

PDES Inc. – Why, How, What • Why: Pre-competitive leverage • How: Structured Collaboration • What: - MBE Roadmap - LOTAR -

Standards Test Bed Best Practices Demo Projects

PDES INC: Why, How, What

YOUR CENTRAL SOURCE FOR DATA EXCHANGE

Raising the Value of Your Product Data

Product Data Integration & Interoperability Solutions

CAD/CAM/CAE Interoperability Solutions Enable Engineering Supply Chain Data Exchange

CAD Model Quality & Validation

Customer Supplier Interoperability Ensure CAD Model Quality

Data Exchange Automation CAD/CAE Model Translation and Transformation

Maximize CAD Model Re-use

Feature/History Based Exchange Legacy CAD Data Migration

Facilitate Global Product Development

Model Based Enterprise Solutions

PDES, Inc. Members Norway

JOTNE EPM TECHNOLOGY

Sweden

UK

Germany

Italy ENGISIS

LKSOFT

DASSAULT CAPVIDIA SYSTEMES AIRBUS

BAE SYSTEMS

THE BOEING COMPANY

Belgium

BOOST CONSEIL

THEOREM SOLUTIONS EUROSTEP

France

United States PTC ROCKWELL COLLINS

WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES HONEYWELL

CT Core Technologies NARA NASA NIST OSD ManTech

PURDUE

ITI USC GEORGIA TECH

SCRA HOST CONTRACTOR

LOCKHEED MARTIN

http://www.pdesinc.org © PDES, Inc. 2014