A Linear Physically-Based Model for Remote Sensing ...

3 downloads 0 Views 952KB Size Report
*Morteza Sadeghi1, Scott B. Jones1, William D. Philpot2. 3 ...... de Jeu, R., W. Wagner, T.R.H. Homes, A.J. Dolman, N.C. van de Giesen, J. Friesen. 2008. Global.
1

A Linear Physically-Based Model for Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture using

2

Short Wave Infrared Bands

3

*Morteza Sadeghi1, Scott B. Jones1, William D. Philpot2

4

1- Dept. Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4820

5

2- School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

6

*Corresponding author at: 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820, USA. Tel.: +1 435-

7

797-2175; fax: +1 435 797 3376.

8 9 10

E-mail addresses: [email protected] (M. Sadeghi), [email protected] (S.B. Jones), [email protected] (W.D. Philpot).

11 12

Acknowledgements

13

Financial support was provided by Utah State University Office of Research and Graduate Studies

14

Research Catalyst (RC) Grant and by the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State

15

University, Logan, Utah 84322-4810, approved as journal paper no. 8746. We also express

16

appreciation to Michael Whiting and David Lobell for sharing their valuable data.

17 18

1

19

Abstract

20

Technological advances in satellite remote sensing have offered a variety of techniques for

21

estimating surface soil water content as a key variable in numerous environmental studies. Optical

22

methods are particularly valuable for remote sensing of soil moisture since reflected solar radiation

23

is the strongest passive signal available to satellites and thus observations at optical wavelengths

24

are capable of providing high spatial resolution data. Since remote sensors do not measure soil

25

water content directly, mathematical algorithms that describe the connection between the

26

measured signal and surface water content must be derived. Here, we present a physically-based

27

soil moisture retrieval model in the solar domain (350 – 2500 nm) that is based on the Kubelka-

28

Munk two-flux radiative transfer theory. The model is designed to describe diffuse reflectance

29

from a uniform, optically thick, absorbing and scattering medium. The theory suggests a linear

30

relationship between a transformed reflectance and soil water content in the short wave infrared

31

bands (e.g. band 7 of Landsat and MODIS satellites) providing an easy-to-use algorithm in these

32

bands. Accuracy of this model was tested and preliminarily verified using laboratory-measured

33

spectral reflectance data of different soils. Further studies on potentials and challenges of this

34

model for large-scale application using optical satellites data remain a topic of ongoing research.

35

Key words: Remote sensing, soil moisture, reflectance, absorption, scattering.

36 37

1. Introduction

38

Surface soil moisture is a fundamental state variable controlling a wide range of processes

39

occurring at the land-atmosphere interface including water infiltration and runoff, evaporation,

40

heat and gas exchange, solute infiltration, erosion, etc. The importance of measuring and 2

41

monitoring surface soil moisture at various spatial scales has been highlighted by many authors

42

(e.g. Vereecken, et al., 2008; Robinson et al., 2008; Wang and Qu, 2009; Ochsner et al., 2013).

43

Despite recent advances in electromagnetic (EM) sensing capability, whether ground-based (Jones

44

et al., 2002; Jones et al., 2005; Bogena et al., 2007; Vaz et al., 2013) or remotely deployed

45

(Huisman et al., 2003; Njoku et al., 2003; de Jeu et al., 2008; Kornelsen and Coulibaly, 2013),

46

accurate assessment of surface water content is still a challenging task due to complex

47

spatiotemporal variability of soil moisture in addition to scaling issues (Western et al. 2002;

48

Western et al. 2004; Wu and Li, 2009; Brocca et al., 2010; Crow et al., 2012; Landrum, 2013; Ojha

49

et al., 2014).

50

The interaction of EM radiation with soils at various wavelengths has been shown to be

51

significantly correlated with surface moisture content. Hence, various remote sensing (RS)

52

methods have been developed in different regions of the EM spectrum. These methods may be

53

classified into three major groups (Verstraeten et al., 2008; Wang and Qu, 2009):

54

i) Optical methods: Methods using optical (or solar domain) bands (wavelengths between 0.35

55

and 2.5 μm) in which the reflected radiation of the sun from the Earth’s surface, known as

56

reflectance, is measured (Ben-Dor et al., 2009). Reflectance is commonly formulated as a function

57

of soil moisture content using empirical (regression) analysis (Wang and Qu, 2009).

58

ii) Thermal infrared methods: Methods in which the thermal emission of the Earth (wavelengths

59

between 3.5 and 14 μm) is measured (Wang and Qu, 2009). The estimation of surface soil moisture

60

using remotely sensed thermal wavebands primarily relies on the use of soil surface temperature

61

measurements, either singly by the thermal inertia method (Verstraeten et al., 2006) or in

3

62

combination with vegetation indices, for example using the so-called “triangle method” (Carlson

63

et al., 1994; Carlson, 2007).

64

iii) Microwave methods: Methods in which the intensity of microwave emission (wavelengths

65

between 5 and 1000 mm) is measured. The fundamental basis of microwave RS of soil moisture

66

is the large contrast between the dielectric properties of water (~ 81) and other soil constituents (