1
A Linear Physically-Based Model for Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture using
2
Short Wave Infrared Bands
3
*Morteza Sadeghi1, Scott B. Jones1, William D. Philpot2
4
1- Dept. Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4820
5
2- School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
6
*Corresponding author at: 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820, USA. Tel.: +1 435-
7
797-2175; fax: +1 435 797 3376.
8 9 10
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (M. Sadeghi),
[email protected] (S.B. Jones),
[email protected] (W.D. Philpot).
11 12
Acknowledgements
13
Financial support was provided by Utah State University Office of Research and Graduate Studies
14
Research Catalyst (RC) Grant and by the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State
15
University, Logan, Utah 84322-4810, approved as journal paper no. 8746. We also express
16
appreciation to Michael Whiting and David Lobell for sharing their valuable data.
17 18
1
19
Abstract
20
Technological advances in satellite remote sensing have offered a variety of techniques for
21
estimating surface soil water content as a key variable in numerous environmental studies. Optical
22
methods are particularly valuable for remote sensing of soil moisture since reflected solar radiation
23
is the strongest passive signal available to satellites and thus observations at optical wavelengths
24
are capable of providing high spatial resolution data. Since remote sensors do not measure soil
25
water content directly, mathematical algorithms that describe the connection between the
26
measured signal and surface water content must be derived. Here, we present a physically-based
27
soil moisture retrieval model in the solar domain (350 – 2500 nm) that is based on the Kubelka-
28
Munk two-flux radiative transfer theory. The model is designed to describe diffuse reflectance
29
from a uniform, optically thick, absorbing and scattering medium. The theory suggests a linear
30
relationship between a transformed reflectance and soil water content in the short wave infrared
31
bands (e.g. band 7 of Landsat and MODIS satellites) providing an easy-to-use algorithm in these
32
bands. Accuracy of this model was tested and preliminarily verified using laboratory-measured
33
spectral reflectance data of different soils. Further studies on potentials and challenges of this
34
model for large-scale application using optical satellites data remain a topic of ongoing research.
35
Key words: Remote sensing, soil moisture, reflectance, absorption, scattering.
36 37
1. Introduction
38
Surface soil moisture is a fundamental state variable controlling a wide range of processes
39
occurring at the land-atmosphere interface including water infiltration and runoff, evaporation,
40
heat and gas exchange, solute infiltration, erosion, etc. The importance of measuring and 2
41
monitoring surface soil moisture at various spatial scales has been highlighted by many authors
42
(e.g. Vereecken, et al., 2008; Robinson et al., 2008; Wang and Qu, 2009; Ochsner et al., 2013).
43
Despite recent advances in electromagnetic (EM) sensing capability, whether ground-based (Jones
44
et al., 2002; Jones et al., 2005; Bogena et al., 2007; Vaz et al., 2013) or remotely deployed
45
(Huisman et al., 2003; Njoku et al., 2003; de Jeu et al., 2008; Kornelsen and Coulibaly, 2013),
46
accurate assessment of surface water content is still a challenging task due to complex
47
spatiotemporal variability of soil moisture in addition to scaling issues (Western et al. 2002;
48
Western et al. 2004; Wu and Li, 2009; Brocca et al., 2010; Crow et al., 2012; Landrum, 2013; Ojha
49
et al., 2014).
50
The interaction of EM radiation with soils at various wavelengths has been shown to be
51
significantly correlated with surface moisture content. Hence, various remote sensing (RS)
52
methods have been developed in different regions of the EM spectrum. These methods may be
53
classified into three major groups (Verstraeten et al., 2008; Wang and Qu, 2009):
54
i) Optical methods: Methods using optical (or solar domain) bands (wavelengths between 0.35
55
and 2.5 μm) in which the reflected radiation of the sun from the Earth’s surface, known as
56
reflectance, is measured (Ben-Dor et al., 2009). Reflectance is commonly formulated as a function
57
of soil moisture content using empirical (regression) analysis (Wang and Qu, 2009).
58
ii) Thermal infrared methods: Methods in which the thermal emission of the Earth (wavelengths
59
between 3.5 and 14 μm) is measured (Wang and Qu, 2009). The estimation of surface soil moisture
60
using remotely sensed thermal wavebands primarily relies on the use of soil surface temperature
61
measurements, either singly by the thermal inertia method (Verstraeten et al., 2006) or in
3
62
combination with vegetation indices, for example using the so-called “triangle method” (Carlson
63
et al., 1994; Carlson, 2007).
64
iii) Microwave methods: Methods in which the intensity of microwave emission (wavelengths
65
between 5 and 1000 mm) is measured. The fundamental basis of microwave RS of soil moisture
66
is the large contrast between the dielectric properties of water (~ 81) and other soil constituents (