A rapid assessment method for wetland functions

18 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
ent stabilizationD enitri cation. Plant N assim il. P adsorpt. and prec. C sequestration. Plant orthoph. assim il. Vegetation cover -. 4 indicators. Drainage system -.
A rapid assessment method for wetland functions Guillaume Gayet1, Florence Baptist2, Pierre Caessteker3, Jean-Christophe Clément4, Stéphanie Gaucherand5, 6 1 1 Francis Isselin-Nondedeu , Julien Touroult , Geneviève Barnaud 1

2

5 3

6

4

Funded by Onema, Département de l’Isère - In collaboration with Dir Onema (Compiègne, Metz, Rennes, Toulouse), Cerema, Forum des Marais Atlantiques

In the context of in-kind* and on-site** mitigation on inland wetlands in accordance with regulations A method for a technical audience ...

... to assess the performance of the functions ...

... tight schedule ...

... when a site is impaired ...

... and offset measures occur on another site

5 biogeochemical functions

3 hydrological functions

1 day available per assessment 2 habitat functions

No-net-loss of functions ? * restore, rehabilitate or create similar wetlands than those impaired ** offset measures are close to the impaired wetland

Step 1 - Is the mitigation scheme an in-kind and on-site scheme ? The method provides a framework to analyse each site Climate, geology and topography

Upland anthropic pressures

Surrounding ecological conditions

Geomorphological and hydrological setting

Plant and animal communities

--> site’s location in surface waterbody

--> land use in site’s contributory area

--> habitats in site’s landscape

--> site’s hydrogeomorphologic system

--> site‘s habitats

If characteristics of both sites are similar :

in-kind and on-site mitigation scheme --> step 2

Step 2 - Is there a no-net-loss of function after the implementation of the mitigation scheme ? The method provides a set of indicators to assess the performance of 10 functions it y ctiv n ne t co itat bita hab f Ha o t ion por rat est Sup l. equ simi Cs . as . re c oph dp rth n l. i nt o t. a p r Pla si m s a dso tN Pa n ion t a Pla ific nitr tion De liza i tab rge nt s c ha im e n r re Sed wate uctio re d und -off Gro Run Vegetation cover 4 indicators Drainage system 5 indicators

No net loss of function is analysed per indicator, it occurs if Decrease of indicator value after impact

x

Equivalence ratio (e.g. 2/1)

Functional loss

Increase of indicator value after offset measures Functional gain

Stakeholders choose equivalence ratio case-by-case depending on impact reversibility, time-lag to obtain functional gain, offset measure failure risk...

Erosion - 2 indicators Soil - 12 indicators Habitats - 9 indicators

Indicator value

=

Two documents and one tool with the method: Parameter value [0-1]

x

site’s area (ha)

Indicator value increases with the performance of function http://www.onema.fr/Guide-de-la-methode-nationale-d-evaluation-des-fonctions-des-zones-humides

General report

Handbook

Spreadsheet on Microsoft® Excel® 2010

Suggest Documents