a tool for predicting basic selective properties for ...

3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
data (Galbraith et. al 1994) assuming different ranges of mesh opening angles (oa). Experimental SR can be explained by the oa range. oa range. L50 (cm) SR ...
FISHSELECT -a tool for predicting basic selective properties for nettings Bent Herrmann, Ludvig A. Krag, Rikke P. Frandsen, Niels Madsen, Bo Lundgren

FISHSELECT Presentation

1.Methodology Bent Herrmann 2.Case studies Ludvig A. Krag

FISHSELECT Methodology • Is a methodology to assess morphological conditions for fish to escape through meshes of different size and shape. • Three main steps in the methodology: 1. Experiments in laboratory a) Morphology measurements b) Fall-through trials 2. Simulation of laboratory experiments 3. Prediction of selective properties for different mesh shapes

1. Experiments in laboratory - morphology Cross section contours are extracted and measured for each fish using the MorphoMeter, scanning and image analysis. Length to cross section size is established. Cod in MorphoMeter

Aggregating data

Scanning

Edge detection

Regression analysis

Cross section description

Experiments in laboratory – fall-through

About 8000 -10000 fall-through trials per species (75 fish x 120 mesh templates)

Simulation of fall-through experiments The fall-through experiments are simulated assuming different levels of cross-section compression. The compression modelled leading to best agreement was used for predictions CS1 penetration model CS1 measured

CS2 CS1

CS1

Measured

Compressed

CS2

Prediction of selective properties A new series of simulations is conducted using a virtual population of fish based on the established morphological relations to predict the selective properties for different nettings.

60 40 20

Opening angle (degree)

80

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

80

100

120

140

Meshsize (mm)

160

180

200

FISHSELECT

Case studies Ludvig A. Krag

Cod – design guide

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

mesh opening angle versus catch weight (D100x100) 70 0

60

80

500 3000

30 20

10 0 0

250

500

750

1000

1250

60

40

40

Opening angle (degree)

O pen ing An g le

50

1500

20

catch weight (kg)

Mesh opening angle versus codend catch (calculated with FEMNET data from Herrmann et al 2006)

80

100

120

140

160

180

Meshsize (mm)

Design guide for cod (diamond mesh)

200

Cod – simulation of experimental results Exp.

Sim.

oa range

L50 (cm)

SR (cm)

Galbraith 1

29.2

6.8

Galbraith 2

28.4

8.5

35

29.8

1.2

25-45

29.6

4.9

20-50

29.4

7.3

15-55

29.2

10.0

Soft

52.2

1.9

Simulation of experimental data (Galbraith et. al 1994) assuming different ranges of mesh opening angles (oa). Experimental SR can be explained by the oa range.

Stochastic simulation of experimental data (Dahm et. al 2002) assuming a realistic range of mesh opening angles (oa).

Cod – explorative simulation

Dahm

Dahm

Predicted consequences on the distribution of L50 and SR by avoiding the lower oa values. Explorative simulation on Dahm et. al 2002 data. Distribution of L50 is narrowed and mean is increased. Distribution of SR is narrowed and mean reduced.

Study on Plaice CS 2

CS 1 CS1

CS 3

Ellipse

CS2 CS3 Half ellipse

Asymmetric trapezoid

L50 (cm) versus mesh size and squareness factor

L50 (cm) versus mesh size and opening angle

50

100

opening angle (degree)

60 40

squareness factor (%)

60 40

20

20

opening angle (degree)

80

150

80

100

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

80

100

120

140

meshsize (mm)

160

180

200

80

100

120

140

mesh size (mm)

160

180

200

80

100

120

140

mesh size (mm)

160

180

200

Study on Turbot Measured

Fin-cut 0% Fin-cut 21%

Compressed

60 40 20

opening angle (degree)

80

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

80

100

120

140

meshsize (mm)

160

180

200

Study on Lemon sole CS1

A penetration model based on CS1 and CS3 was applied to predict the basic selective properties for Lemon sole in diamond meshes

60 40 20

CS3

opening angle (degree)

80

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

80

100

120

140

meshsize (mm)

160

180

200

Study on Sole CS3 CS2

CS1

CS1

CS2

CS3

Study on haddock CS1

60 40 20

Opening angle (degree)

80

L50 (cm) versus meshsize and opening angle

Penetration model based on CS1 80

100

120

140

Meshsize (mm)

160

180

200

NEPHROPS Combination of different contact modes can help understand experimental results 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Diamond 90 mm

Square 70 mm 1

0.75 0.5

Experimental Simulated

0.25

Retention rate

Retention rate

1

0.75 0.5

Experimental Simulated

0.25 0

0 10

20

30

40

Carapax length (mm)

50

60

10

20

30

40

Carapax length (mm)

50

60

T0 and T90 T0

Net loading

Edge detection

Shape extraction

TEXT

T90

FISHSELECT can be used to study selective properties for nettings when used in normal direction and in 90 degrees turned direction

Simulation of sizeselection

Estimation of L50

Deployment of FISHSELECT data and results FISHSELECT can: •

Produce design guides for towed gears for different fisheries.



Assist with interpretation of experimental results obtained from sea trials.



Provide a better foundation for exploring new design ideas for selective gears to be tested at sea.



Provide basis for a quick and well-founded advice about technical regulations in different fisheries.



Provide basis for further development of the cod-end selectivity simulation tool PRESEMO.

FISHSELECT status • Nationally funded project completed in 2007. • Two papers have been submitted (method & cod) and several are in preparation. • Corporation with UIT (Norway) has been established (new species – Barents Sea) • New corporations in other areas are welcome! • We are hoping to integrate FISHSELECT in future internationally funded studies and projects.

Suggest Documents