Phase Separation in Cuprate Superconductorsâ ed. by E. Sigmund and K.A. ... L.P. Regnault, P. Bourges, P. Burlet, C. Vettier, J.Y. Henry, Phyisica B 192, 109 (1993). [25] W.Y. Liang, J.W. Loram, K.A. Mirza, N. Athanassopoulou, J.R. Cooper, ...
a − b plane optical conductivity in YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ above and below T ∗ . D.Mihailovic† , T.Mertelj‡†
arXiv:cond-mat/9801032v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 6 Jan 1998
†
Solid State Physics Department, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ‡ Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
K.A.M¨ uller Physics Department, University of Zurich, CH-Zurich, Switzerland Analysis of the a−b plane optical conductivity σab for both twinned and untwinned YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ as a function of temperature and doping shows that below a well defined temperature T ∗ , a dip in the spectrum systematically appears separating the infrared charge excitation spectrum into two components with distinct energy scales. The change from monotonic behaviour in σab is found to be concurrent with the onset of phonon anomalies in Raman and infrared spectra below T ∗ . The optical data are suggested to be evidence for the appearance of an inhomogeneous distribution of carriers rather than the opening of a simple gap for charge excitations below T ∗ , an interpretation wich is consistent with recent angle-resoved photoemission and electronic Raman spectra. We find that the behaviour below T ∗ and the absence of any anomalies at Tc can be interpreted assuming a Bose-Einstein condensation of preformed pairs.
Following theoretical ideas on inhomogeneous charge carrier distributions and phase separation in cuprate superconductors [1–3], significant experimental support has recently been accumulating for a two-component charge carrier picture, particularly in the underdoped region of the phase diagram of these materials. Structural evidence from extendend X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) [4] and neutron pair distribution function analysis (PDF) [5] as well as NMR, NQR and Mossbauer [6–9] spectroscopies [10] indicate that below a certain cross-over temperature T ∗ , the Cu-O planes may contain stripes of carrier-rich and carrier-poor regions on length scales typical of the superconducting coherence length ξs . These features apparently have quite fast dynamics [11] making the textures observable only with spectroscopies with sufficiently short characteristic timescales. Although initially the NMR data suggested that the underdoped state may be characterized by a gap primarily for spin excitations, recent angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) [12] and time-resolved optical photomodulation data [13] suggest that some kind of a gap may also be present - at least for parts of the Fermi surface - for charge excitations as well. The appearance of such a pseudogap above Tc appears to be quite a general phenomenon and is observed also in many other systems, including the superconducting bismouthates like Ba1−x Kx BiO3 [14], heavy Fermion superconductors [15] and possibly even in the roton excitation spectrum of LHe [16], implying a possible common underlying reason for its existence in all these systems. However in the case of the cuprates, the data from a key experiment - infrared optical spectroscopy - has not yet been systematically discussed in terms of the above-mentioned picture. Although the existence of a ”pseudogap” in the out-of-plane optical conductivity σ1c has been investigated in some detail [17–20], the in-plane optical data has so far been discussed mainly in terms of a single-component framework of an extended Drude model with temperatureand frequency-dependent scattering rate τ (ω, T ) and carrier mass m∗ (ω, T ) [26,27] and no systematic analysis of σ(ω, T ) as a function of doping and temperature has yet been performed. It is the purpose of this paper to present an analysis of the available a − b plane optical conductivity data in terms of the two-component picture. We concentrate primarily on YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ where the data are most complete and the contributions to the optical conductivity arising from the chains and planes can be identified from a − b anisotropy measurements of σ1 (ω, T ) [28]. Our analysis of the doping and temperature dependence of the optical conductivity are performed on published data and unambiguously show that the in-plane optical conductivity qualitatively changes at a characteristic temperature T ∗ from a single-component spectrum above, to one with (at least) two components below T ∗ . These findings together with enumeration of various phonon anomalies in the Raman and infrared spectra, collected from the available data apparently confirm the two-component paradigm of the normal state in the underdoped materials below T ∗ , and define the temperature and frequency dependence of the excitations in the two-component state. In common with most near-optimally doped cuprate samples, the real part of the room temperature optical conductivity along the crystallographic a-axis σ1a of YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ below ω ∼ 400 cm−1 shows a monotonic decrease with increasing frequency reminiscent of an inverse law σ(ω) ∼ 1/ω . Above this frequency the inverse law fails and an additional spectral weight is necessary to describe the spectra [29]. Below room temperature (but still above Tc ) a dip ubiquitously appears in the range 400 - 800 cm−1 which becomes more pronounced with further cooling and
1
eventually below Tc the residual conductivity shows only a characteristic mid-infrared (MIR) peak at around 1000 cm−1 which again is a feature common to all the cuprates. To analyse this behaviour of σ1 (ω, T ) more quantitatively, we have selected an arbitrary criterion to define the temperature T ∗ at which σ1 (ω, T ) departs from monotonic behaviour and the first derivative σ ′ (ω) shows a maximum (i.e. a point of inflexion appears) as shown schematically by the arrow in the Figure 1. Data for a number of YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ samples with different Tc ’s and δ were collected and the results of the analysis are plotted as a function of Tc in Figure 2. Because there are usually not many spectra at different temperatures available, the data are necessarily plotted with a range of temperatures indicated as error-bars. Nevertheless, the correlation between the temperature T ∗ where the spectrum departs from monotonic behaviour and Tc is quite evident and the relation appears almost linear in YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ over the whole range of δ. To complement the analysis on σ1 , we have systematically collected infrared and Raman phonon spectra on YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ with different δ and determined the temperatures Tanomaly at which phonon anomalies appear. To expand the data set somewhat we have also used the published data on phonon anomalies in the 124 and 247 structures, which have similar optimal Tc as 123 [30]. IR phonons anomalies are observed above Tc for phonons involving c-axis displacements of Y, Ba, O1 (chain), O2/O3, O4 and Cu1(chain) ions [31,32] in 123 system and of O1 (chain) and O2/O3 ions in 124 system. [33,34]. Among Raman active phonons it is interesting to note that the 340-cm−1B1g -like O2/O3 planar buckling phonon shows little or no anomalies above Tc in underdoped region of doping. [33,35,36] On the other hand the related in phase Ag O2/O3 planar phonon at 440 cm−1 shows a significantly more pronounced anomaly above Tc . [33,36] In the 124 system [36] anomalies above Tc in underdoped region are reported also for the 108-cm−1Ba phonon, 256-cm−1 Cu1 phonon and 501-cm−1 O4 phonon. There is no clear data on whether such anomalies for Ba and O4 phonons exist also in YBCO-123. The citerion for determination of the temperatures Tanomaly was a discontinuous change in the phonon frequency and/or linewidth. A plot of Tanomaly as a function of doping is shown in the insert to Figure 2 as a function of Tc . The larger scatter in the data in this case is partly due to the ambiguity in determining the exact temperature where a phonon anomaly occurs. Despite this, it can be seen, that in virtually all cases phonon anomalies appear below T ∗ . Depending on δ, Tanomaly seems to vary such that in the ortho-II phase of YBCO (70K < Tc < 93K), Tanomaly . T ∗ , while in the Ortho-I phase (0 < Tc < 70 K), Tanomaly ≪ T ∗ . For optimal doping there is no sign of any phonon anomalies above Tc , so we assume Tanomaly ≈ Tc . Unfortunately, at present there is insufficient data to be able to correlate the behaviour of particular phonons with different values of Tanomaly and there is a clear need for such a study in the future. For completeness, the T ∗ data from optical conductivity are plotted as a function of oxygen content in Figure 3 [43] together with Tc . These data for T ∗ obtained from σab are in good agreement with data on σc [17–20] and with other data from a variety of experimental techniques on YBCO, including ARPES, DC transport and NMR, where it is often called a spin gap temperature Tsg . In the present case, the optical conductivity experiments measure only dipole transitions, and T ∗ therefore signifies the pseudogap opening for charge excitations. The appearance of a pseudogap for spin excitations will thus necessarily follow at the same temperature. (The converse is is not necessarily true). Although there appears to be an apparent spread of values of T ∗ and Tsg in the literaure, suggesting the possible existence of two pseudogaps appearing at different temperatures, when it is taken into account that very different criteria are used to define T ∗ by different authors, and that different spectroscopic techniques average over momentum in different ways, data on YBCO do not appear to support the two gap hypothesis at present. Careful examination of the optical conductivity data for σab and σc , particularly in comparison with the data on the increase in NMR T1 relaxation time (usually expressed as a drop in 1/T1 T ) [22,21], NMR Knight shift K [21,23], neutron scattering [24] and specific heat data [25] does not yield any systematic difference in T ∗ . However, with significantly improved sample characterization in the underdoped state and a well-defined common criterion for defining T ∗ the existence of two distinct, closely spaced gaps cannot be excluded. Let us now turn to a discussion of the presented data in the general framework of the inhomogeneous phase models. Commonly, the state below T ∗ is suggested to consist of carrier-poor and carrier-rich regions. The optical response is expected to reflect this, the existence of identifyably different spectral features below T ∗ and a single component above T ∗ is in clear accordance with these models. Below T ∗ , the low-frequency spectrum - which is assumed to be due to itinerant charges - is strongly temperature-dependent, has no identifyable spectral signatures and is described well phenomenologically by an extended Drude model (albeit over a small spectral region). As a corrollary, the MIR would be expected to be due to the excitation of bound localized carriers to the itinerant carrier ’Fermionic’ phase in addition to non-adiabatic hopping processes within the insulating phase itself as will be discussed below. Examining the behaviour of the MIR feature as a function of δ in more detail, we have plotted the residual conductivity at the peak in the MIR (usually in the range 1000 - 1300 cm−1 ) below Tc as a function of doping in Figure 4. The data extracted from Rotter et al. [28] are of particular relevance because they are from untwinned single MIR crystals (also for lower δ). We find an unambiguous increase in σ1MIR with increasing δ. Comparing the σ1a with 2
MIR MIR MIR σ1ab shows that the in-plane conductivity σ1ab shows very similar systematics as the total conductivity σ1ab . The MIR MIR ratio σ1ab /σ1a = ζ appears to be only weakly dependent on δ, indicating that the increasing O doping gives rise to increasing conductivity in the chains and planes on an almost equal footing. Moreover, the ratio between the total and chain conductivity is ζ = 1.4 to 1.8 and is surprisingly similar to the anisotropy of the DC conductivity σ(0) [44] which suggests that O doping results in an increase in conductivity of both the Drude and MIR parts equally (see Figure 4). The spectral shape of the MIR is similar (but not identical) to the photoinduced polaronic features observed in the insulating phase in YBCO, and is virtually indistinguishable from the MIR response of the insulator PrBa2 Cu3 O7−δ [45,46] (including anisotropy). This, together with clearly visible phonon overtones [47] in the MIR spectrum led many authors in the past to a (bi)polaronic interpretation of the MIR [47,48]. In this model, the MIR absorption results from non-adiabatic carrier hopping processes where a different number of phonons is emitted and reabsorbed, the difference in energy being taken up by the IR photon. However, the measured MIR spectral shape shows significant deviations from the predicted polaronic spectrum [48,50] and expansion of this simple polaron hopping model to include a realistic density of phonon states and allowing for phonon dispersion still cannot reproduce the highly asymmetric peak in the MIR data. However, when we consider a two-component state, an additional process becomes possible, namely the excitation of carriers from the polaronic bound state to the unbound Fermionic state [49]. The expected MIR spectrum in this case exhibits an asymmetric spectral shape much closer to the experimentally observed one. A more sophisticated attempt at describing the MIR lineshape in detail might include both excitations from the localized states to the delocalized band [49] as well as non-adiabatic [50] hopping processes between localized states. The interpretation of the MIR given above is supported by recent resonant electronic Raman spectra of Ruani and Ricci [51], where an electronic peak in the region of 0.06 eV (500 cm−1 ) is observed below T ∗ . The authors attribute this peak to excitations between dispersionless polaronic bands near the S-point of the Brillouin zone. Further support for the proposed interpretation comes from the observation of a depression in the density of states below T ∗ in the same region of the Brillouin zone in ARPES [12]: to satisfy the sum rule, (bi)polaron formation (i.e.pairing) below T ∗ must be accompanied by a depletion in the density of states near EF , causing the appearance of a pseudo-gap in the ARPES spectrum. The present analysis is essentially an alternative phenomenological view of the electrodynamic response of the cuprate superconductors to the one-component memory function parametrization more usually discussed in the recent past [26,27]. We believe it provides additional physical insight into the normal and superconducting state properties in line with the numerous recent suggestions for the co-existence of two structural local units in these materials [10]. Analysis of the optical conductivity in YBa2 Cu3 O7−δ as a function of δ and T reveals some seemingly universal features which could be considered as a possible definition of the low-energy charge excitation spectrum for the cuprates:
1. The a − b optical conductivity σ1ab or σ1a (with or without chains respectively) in YBCO universally displays a break from monotonic behaviour near 400 cm−1 (50 meV) below some temperature T ∗ . The changes in the optical spectrum below T ∗ suggest a separation of σ1 into two separate responses with characteristic excitation energy scales and well-defined and different ω and T -dependences, rather than the opening of a simple gap. Above T ∗ the two excitations appear indistinguishable, presumably as a result of thermal fluctuations. 2. Below T ∗ the low-frequency optical conductivity (ω < 400 cm−1 ) of the itinerant carriers is apparently described reasonably well by an extended Drude model with a frequency- and temperature-dependent scattering rate τs [27]. Assuming a Fermi energy of 0.1 eV and m∗ = 4me , we find that the mean free path λc = vF τs for the Drude ˙ which is remarkably close to the typical length scale of the spatial inhomogeneities carriers at T ∗ is ∼ 25 A (stripe widths) found in structural experiments [4,5], suggesting that the properties of the Drude carriers are determined by the physics of the Fermions in the confined structure. The increasing λc at lower temperatures might be a sign of increasing coherence between stripes, rather than increasing stripe width. 3. The 2-component analysis is consistent both with the observations of a ”pseudogap” in transport [52], NMR [53] and ARPES [12]. An explanation consistent with all four experimental techniques involves the formation of polarons in carrier-poor regions below T ∗ giving rise to a reduction in the DOS at EF and hence a drop in the χ(ω = 0) for NMR, as well as an apparent shift in the binding energy Eb in ARPES. This polaronic effect is indeed expected to be associated with the flat, dispersionless regions of the Fermi surface, consistent with the enhanced polaron effective mass m∗ , the electronic Raman data [51] and ARPES [12]. MIR 4. The in-plane MIR conductivity σ1a - which is presumed to be principally due to the excitation of localized carriers to the Fermionic regions in the Cu-O planes - increases in intensity systematically with δ closely following the density of doped holes and is only weakly temperature dependent.
3
5. Numerous phonon anomalies appear in the optical conductivity in a range of temperatures such that Tanomaly < T ∗ , suggesting a coupling of the lattice degrees of freedom to the electronic charge excitations. Unfortunately there is insufficient data available at present for a more detailed examination of which phonons are involved, but the structural data from EXAFS [4] and PDF [5] appear to corroborate this observation. The T ∗ observable for charge excitations appears to be consistent with Tsg in NMR and other experimental techniques, and is at this time experimentally indistinguishable from it. Finally, we briefly discuss the possible involvement of (bi)polarons in superconductivity. Their role was usually dismissed as unimportant on the grounds that there is no observable change in σ(ω) at MIR frequencies at Tc . In the BCS scenario, pairing occurs simultaneously with the opening of a gap in the charge excitation spectrum and the appearance of a macroscopic phase coherent state at (or very near) Tc . As a result of the gap, a significant change in spectral weight is observed in σ(ω) below Tc . In contrast, in the BE condensation picture, pairing is an independent process from condensation and the establishment of phase coherence. Of course it must occur above (or at) the condensation temperature because the process of condensation requires a macroscopic number of particles with Bose statistics to be present. In the case of underdoped cuprates, where neither the Drude nor MIR show any change at Tc itself, the implication is that BE condensation of pre-formed pairs takes place with no change in pairing amplitude. It is natural to presume that because the redistribution of spectral weight in the optical spectrum starts to occur at T ∗ , this temperature should be associated with the onset of pair formation. Hence we conclude the paper by pointing out that the suggested two component interpretation of the optical conductivity spectra in underdoped cuprates is consistent with pair formation at T ∗ and the Bose-Einstein condensation of such pairs across, or together with itinerant ’Drude’ carriers into a macroscopically coherent ground state at Tc [54]. I. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was partly supported by the EU. One of us (D.M.) wishes to acknowledge discussion with D.Van derMarel and V.V.Kabanov.
[1] V.J.Emery and S.A.Kivelson, Phys. Rev.Lett. 64, 475 (1990); ibid. Phys.Rev. B42, 4523 (1990); ibid., Physica C 209, 597 (1993), ibid in ”Phase separation in Cuprate Superconductors” Eds. K.A.Muller and G.Bendek (World Scientific, 1992). [2] E.Sigmund, V.Hizhnyakov and G.Seibold in ”Phase separation in Cuprate Superconductors” Eds. K.A.Muller and G.Bendek (World Scientific, 1992). [3] C.Di Castro and M.Grilli, in ”Phase separation in Cuprate Superconductors” Eds. K.A.Muller and G.Bendek (World Scientific, 1992). [4] A.Bianconi, N.L.Sini, A.Lanzara, M.Missori, RT.Rosetti, H.Oyanagi, H.Yamaguchi, K.Oka, T.Ito, Phys. Rev.Lett. 76, 3412 (1996), A.Bianconi et al., Europhys. Lett. 31, 411 (1995), and references therein. [5] T.Egami and S.Billinge in ”Physical Properties of High-Temperature Superconductors V” Ed. D.M.Ginsberg (World Scientific, Singapore 1996). [6] Proc. Int. Conf. M2S-HTSC- IV Grenoble 1994, Physica C 235 - 240 (1994). See for example review by C.Berthier et al, p.67, and contributed papers in the section on resonance techniques pp. 1627 - 1734. [7] M.A. Teplov et al., in Proc. NATO ASI ” Materials aspects of High-Tc superconductivity : 10 years after the discovery” to be published by Kluwer, 1997. [8] P.C. Hammel et al. Phase Separation in Cuprate Superconductors” ed. by E. Sigmund and K.A. M¨ uller, (Springer Berlin 1994) p. 185. [9] Y. Wu, S. Pradhan, and P. Boolchand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3184 (1991). [10] D. Mihailovic, K.A. M¨ uller, in Proc. NATO ASI ” Materials aspects of High-Tc superconductivity : 10 years after the discovery” to be published by Kluwer, 1997. [11] C.J. Stevens, D. Smith, C. Chen, J.F. Ryan, B. Podobnik, D. Mihailovic, G.A. Wagner, J.E. Evetts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2212 (1997). [12] H. Ding, M.R. Norman, T. Yokoya, T. Takeuchi, M. Randeria, J.C. Campuzano, T. Takashi, T. Mochiku, K. Kadowaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2628 (1997). [13] J. Demsar, M. Zavrtanik, B. Podobnik, V.I. Dediu and D. Mihailovic, Proc. of Stripes ’96, Rome 8.-12. Dec. 1996, to be published in J. of Superconductivity. [14] see for example Namateme, T.Uchida, Phys.Rev.B 50, 13674 (1994) or M.Karlow et al, Phys.Rev.B 48, 6499 (1993)
4
[15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]
[23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43]
[44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54]
F.Steglich (unpublished) K.H.Andersen et al, Phys.Rev.Lett. 77, 4043 (1996) C.C. Homes, T. Timusk,, R.Liang, D.A. Bonn, W.N. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1645 (1993). D.N. Basov, T. Timusk, B. Dabrowski, J.D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3511 (1994). C.C. Homes, T. Timusk, D.A. Bonn, R. Liang W.N. Hardy, Physica C 254, 265 (1995). S. Tajima, Ferroelectrics 177, 95 (1996). M. Takigawa, A.P. Reyes, P.C. Hammel, J.D. Thompson, R.H. Heffner, Z. Fisk, K.C. Ott, Phys. Rev B 43, 247 (1991). M. Horvatic, T. Auler, C. Berthier, Y. Berthier, P. Butaud, W.G. Clark, J.A. Gillet, P. Segransan, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3461 (1993); M. Takigawa, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4158 (1994); G.-q.Zheng, T. Odaguchi, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Y. Kodama, K. Mizuhashi, S. Uchida, Physica C 263, 367,(1996); T. Machi, I. Tomeno, K. Tai, N. Koshizuka, H. Yasouka, Physica C 226, 227 (1994); M. Matsumura, Y. Sakomoto, T. Fushihara, Y. Itoh, H. Yamagata, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 64, 721 (1995); A. Goto, H. Yasuoka, Y. Ueda, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 65, 3043 (1996). G.V.M. Williams, J.L. Tallon, E.M. Haines, R. Michalak, R. Dupree, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 721 (1997). J. Rossat-Mignod, L.P. Regnault, P. Bourges, P. Burlet, C. Vettier, J.Y. Henry, Phyisica B 192, 109 (1993). W.Y. Liang, J.W. Loram, K.A. Mirza, N. Athanassopoulou, J.R. Cooper, Physica C 236, 277 (1996). A.V. Puchkov, P. Fournier, D.N. Basov, T. Timusk, A. Kapitulnik, N.N. Kolesnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3212 (1996). A.V. Puchkov, D. N. Basov, T. Timusk, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 10049 (1996). L.D. Rotter, Z. Schlesinger, R.T. Collins, F. Holtzberg, C. Field, U.W. Welp, G.W. Crabtree, J.Z. Liu, Y. Fang, K.G. Vandervoort, S. Fleshler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2741 (1991). D.B.Tanner and T.Timusk, ”Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors III” Ed. D.M.Ginsberg, (World Scientific, 1992). E.Kaldis, J. Karpinsky, S. Rusiecki, B. Bucher, K. Conder, E. Jilek, Physics C 185-189, 190 (1991). J. Sh¨ utzman, S. Tajima, S. Miyamoto, Y. Sato, R. Hauff, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13665 (1995). C.C. Homes, T. Timusk, D.A. Bonn, R. Liang, W.N. Hardy, Can. J. Phys. 73, 663 (1995). A.P. Livinchuk, C. Thomsen, M. Cardona, Sol. Stat. Comm 83, 343(1992). A.P. Livinchuk, C. Thomsen, M. Cardona,J. Karpinsky, E.Kaldis, S. Rusiecki, Z. Phys. B 92,9 (1993). M. Krantz, H. J. Rosen, R. M. Mcfarlane, V.Y. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 38, 4992 (1988). E.T. Heyen, M. Cardona, J. Karpinsky, E.Kaldis, S. Rusiecki, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12958 (1991). A.P. Livinchuk, C. Thomsen, P. Murugaj, M. Cardona, Z. Phys. B 86, 329 (1993). K. Kamar´ as, S.L. Herr, C.D. Porter, N. Tache, D.B. Tanner, S. Etemad, T. Vanketasan, E. Chase, A. Inam, X.D. Wu, M.S. Hegde, B. Dutta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 84 (1990). J. Sh¨ utzman, W.Ose, J. Keller, K.F. Renk, B. Roas, L. Shultz, G.Saemann-Ischenko, Europhys. Lett. 8, 679 (1989). D.B. Tanner, D.B. Romero, K. Kamar´ as, G.L. Carr, L. Forro, D. Mandrus, L. Mihaly, G.P. Williams, in Electronic structure and Mechanisms for High Temperature Superconductivity, G.C. Vezolli et al., editors, (Plenum Press, New York 1991). J. Orenstein, G.A. Thomas, A.J. Millis, S.L. Cooper, D.H. Rapkine, T. Timusk, L.F. Schneemayer, J.V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6342 (1990). Z. Schlesinger, R.T. Collins, F. Holtzberg, C. Feild, G. Koren, A. Gupta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 11237 (1990). Some ambiguity arises in assigning δ from the published Tc ’s near optimum doping because of the existence of two phases above δ = 6.92. The exact point of intersection between the T ∗ and Tc curves is ambiguous δ near optimum doping as indicated by the two dotted lines. T.A. Friedmann, M.W. Rabin, J. Giapintzakis, J.P. Rice, D.M. Ginsberg, Phys. Rev. B42, 6217 (1990). K.Takenaga, Y.Imanaka, K.Tamasaku, T.Ito and S.Uchida, Phys.Rev.B 46, 5833 (1992). J.Kircher, J.Humlicek, D.Fuchs, H.-U.Habermeier, M.Cardona and A.Roeseler, Physica C 185-189, 957 (1991). P.Calvani et al, ”Anharmonic Properties of High-Tc Cuprates”, Eds. D.Mihailovic, G.Ruani, E.Kaldis, K.A.Muller, p. 139 (World Scientific, 1995), ibid., Phys.Rev. B53, 2756 (1996). D. Mihailovic, C.M. Foster, K. Voss, A.J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. B42, 7989 (1990). V.V.Kabanov and D.K.Ray, Phys.Rev.B 52, 13021 (1995) H.G. Reik, Sol. Stat. Comm. 1, 67 (1963). G. Ruani, P. Ricci, Phys. Rev. B 55, 93 (1997). B. Batlogg, H.Y. Hwang, H. Takagi, R.J. Cava, H.L. Kao, J. Kwo, Physica C 235-240, 130 (1994). J.Bobroff et al Phys.Rev.Lett. 78, 3757 (1997) and references therin. A.S.Alexandrov and J.Ranninger, Phys.Rev.B 23, 1796 (1981), A.S.Alexandrov and N.F.Mott, ”Polarons and Bipolarons”, (World Scientific, 1995); a somewhat similar picture is also discussed by V.J.Emery, S.A.Kivelson, and O. Zahar, Phys. Rev.B 56, 6120 (1997), V.J. Emery and S.A. Kivelson, Nature, 374, 434, (1995).
II. FIGURE CAPTIONS
Figure 1. A schematic of the optical conductivity σ1a perpendicular to the chains in YBCO at different temperatures. Similar behaviour is observed also in Bi and La cuprate compounds. [41] 5
Figure 2. T ∗ as a function of Tc as determined from the appearance of an inflexion point in the in-plane optical conductivity. Seemingly there is no significant difference between σ1 ab and σ1a . Insert: Tanomaly as a function of Tc as determined from phonon anomalies in the infrared and Raman spectra of 123, 124 and 247. Full symbols represent Raman data. Figure 3. The phase diagram of YBCO determined from the in-plane optical conductivity. Seemingly there is no significant difference between σ1 ab and σ1a . Figure 4. The magnitude of the ”residual” MIR as a function of a) O content and b) Tc in YBaCuO. The upper data are for σ1ab , while the lower data set are for σ1a .
6
'0LKDLORYLFHWDO),*85(
. .
FP
. F
77
F
5H
σDE Ω
7!7
77
F
)UHTXHQF\FP
'0LKDLORYLFHWDO),*85(
UHI UHI
UHI
7DQRPDO\.
UHI
UHI UHI
UHI UHI
7 .
7F.
UHI UHI
UHI UHI UHI UHI
7 . F
'0LKDLORYLFHWDO)LJXUH
7
7HPSHUDWXUH.
7F
2[\JHQFRQWHQW
D
UHI
E
UHI UHI
UHI
σDE
σDE
σD
σD
2[\JHQFRQWHQW
7F.
ΩFP
0,5SHDNLQWHQVLW\DWFP
0,5SHDNLQWHQVLW\DWFP
ΩFP
'0LKDLORYLFHWDO),*85(