RSC Advances Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
COMMUNICATION
Cite this: RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808
Received 23rd October 2015 Accepted 28th January 2016
View Article Online View Journal | View Issue
Absorbance response of a graphene oxide coated U-bent optical fiber sensor for aqueous ethanol detection S. S. Gao,a H. W. Qiu,a C. Zhang,a S. Z. Jiang,*a Z. Li,a X. Y. Liu,a W. W. Yue,a C. Yang,a Y. Y. Huo,a D. J. Fengb and H. S. Lic
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra22211g www.rsc.org/advances
In this work, the dynamic change of the absorbance for aqueous ethanol detection based on a graphene oxide (GO) coated U-bent optical fiber sensor (UOFS) was investigated. The U-bent probe was fabricated by bending an unclad multimode plastic cladding silica fiber (nominally at 62.5/125 mm) into a U-shaped structure. GO film was coated on the surface of the U-bent probe using a dip-coating technique. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to characterize the GO film. A comparison of absorbance spectra and the dynamic absorbance response of the UOFS with and without GO film towards aqueous ethanol with a concentration from 5% to 100% was carried out in a wavelength range from 500 to 800 nm. The UOFS coating with GO film exhibits higher resolution and sensitivity compared with that of the UOFS without GO film. In addition, the UOFS with GO film shows excellent repeatability and reversibility, and the response and recovery times are as short as 1–2 s.
1. Introduction Refractive index (RI) is a basic datum in optics and it is an optical property of materials, especially in liquids. Several methods have been developed by many scholars to measure RI, such as high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, and infrared spectroscopy in past decades.1 However, these traditional ways of RI measurement are time consuming and require large samples, complex operations, and experienced operators. Optical ber, owing to high sensitivity corresponding to an external disturbance, has been widely studied as a sensor for chemicals, biological samples and in physical quantity detection in the past few decades, especially measuring RI changes in a
School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250000, People’s Republic of China. E-mail:
[email protected]
b
College of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, People’s Republic of China
c Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology of Shandong Province, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan 250117, People’s Republic of China
15808 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815
small volumes of liquid.2–5 Besides, an immunity to electromagnetic interference and temperature, low attenuation, low cost, and small size are some advantages of optical ber sensors over conventional sensors. Optical ber sensors have become an emerging eld in RI measurement, such as RI sensors based on evanescent wave6–11 and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) determination.12–14 Nonetheless, the high penetration depth of the evanescent eld (particularly for the UV region) and the accurate thickness (nanometer scale) of thin metal lms (such gold or silver) are also crucial for a sensitive signal.15 An alternative to this is to introduce geometric bends to increase the sensitivity in the sensing region. Such bends lead to the coupling of energy between diverse guided modes and leaky modes, and as a result the output intensity reduces and more power interacts with the analyte in the sensing region. At the same time, the output is still quite sensitive to RI changes in the surrounding medium in the sensing region. Different optical ber shape designs including straight, U-bent, tapered tip, and biconical tapers have been employed in development of absorbance based sensors.16–19 The tapered bers can also achieve high sensitivity compared with normal bers. However, U-bent bers have some advantages over tapered bers. First, the Ubent bers can be prepared in a reproducible and facile way; we can obtain a U-bent ber just by folding both ends of the ber at high temperature, while it is difficult to control the shape of a taper with the same cone angles in a reproducible manner. Second, U-bent bers are much more suitable for detection in narrow and small spaces; on the contrary, tapered bers are easily destroyed in narrow spaces. Besides, U-bent bers have better compatibility with instrument congurations, unlike tapered bers which require a Y-type coupler.20,21 What’s more, U-bent probes have been demonstrated to exhibit a 10-fold improvement in absorbance sensitivity over straight probes.21 Owing to these factors, our sensor was constructed using a U-bent optical ber. Graphene oxide (GO) is one of the graphene derived nanomaterials, endowed with extraordinary characteristics and benets, including high surface-to-volume ratio, excellent
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
Communication
transparency, high thermal conductivity and so on. Functional groups such as epoxy, carbonyl, and carboxylic acid endow GO with a better affinity than graphene in aqueous solution or organic solvents. Recently, some articles have demonstrated that GO is an attractive material for the detection of chemical molecules, such as ethanol and benzene,22–24 that is, GO lm can capture ethanol or benzene molecules effectively. Flexibility and high light transmission allow GO to effectively combine with optical ber.25 A tapered optical ber sensor with GO for aqueous ethanol detection in a concentration range from 5% to 80% has been demonstrated by Yaacoba’s group.26 However, to the best of our knowledge, no articles have been published that combine GO with U-bent optical ber probes. In this paper, we present a novel GO coated UOFS for aqueous ethanol detection in a concentration range from 5% to 100%. The U-bent probe was fabricated by bending an unclad multimode plastic cladding silica ber into a U-shaped structure and coated with GO using a dip-coating technique. Importantly, the developed sensor has high resolution, perfect sensitivity, a wide measurement range and a fast response and recovery towards aqueous ethanol in a concentration range from 5% to 100%. The second linear tting relationship between concentration and absorbance makes the developed sensor an effective platform for aqueous ethanol detection.
2.
Experimental methods
2.1. U-bent probe fabrication A standard multimode plastic cladding silica ber with a core and cladding diameter of 62.5 and 125 mm respectively was used in this experiment. Briey, optical bers were cut into 40 cm long pieces using an optical ber cleaver with 2 cm unclad in the middle area. Aer the ber was washed with ethanol and acetone to remove possible residual polymers and contaminants, the middle area of the ber was heated using a butane candle ame and bent into a U-bent structure. It should be noted that an optimum temperature and bending force should be maintained to ensure that the bending diameter remains the same.
2.2. Preparation of GO thin lm The GO was prepared using the modied Hummers method.27 In a typical synthesis, graphite powder was dissolved in a cold mixture of H2SO4 and NaNO3. KMnO4 was added slowly with magnetic stirring and the mixture was cooled in an ice water bath to keep the reaction temperature below 20 C. The mixture was stirred at 35 C for 2 h, and then diluted with water. Additional water and H2O2 were added. Finally, the mixture was washed and puried with HCl aqueous solution and water. The resulting GO solid product was dried under vacuum at 60 C. A GO suspension was prepared by suspending the GO solid in water with a concentration of 0.5 mg ml1. The GO suspension was coated on the surface of the U-bent probe using a dipcoating method. Before and aer the coating, the ber was annealed on a heating platform at 50 C for 10 minutes to
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
RSC Advances
enhance the combination and deposition of GO lm on the surface. 2.3. Optical set-up The UOFS contains four portions, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In the order from le to right is the light source, U-bent ber, spectrometer (PG2000, Ideaoptics Instruments) and the PC. A white light emitting diode generating 470–850 nm wavelength light was used as the light source. In order to obtain a steady light intensity, a constant current source was used as the power source. One end of the U-bent optical ber was coupled to the light source and another end was coupled to the spectrometer using an optical ber patch cord. The intensity of light coupled into the ber changed when the UOFS was immersed in aqueous ethanol at different concentrations. The output light was collected and the full absorbance spectra were recorded intime by a spectrometer. At last, Morpho soware installed on the computer was used to process the data recorded by the spectrometer. 2.4. Sensing mechanism In the U-bent region as shown in Fig. 1(b), the total reection law of light transmission is broken due to the bending, which leads to leaky modes, a greater number of light reections and deeper penetration depth of the evanescent eld. However, the transmittance of light depends on the leaky modes of light and absorption of the evanescent eld penetrating into the sensing region formed by the absorbing sample uid.20 In this case, the absorbance would change signicantly due to the imperceptible RI variation compared to the straight ber. As shown in Fig. 1(c), the light transmitting in the core would reect and refract at the interface of the core and cladding. Then, the light radiating into the cladding would also reect and refract at the interface of the cladding and GO lm. Partial light would leak out of the cladding, and the RI of the GO lm would increase more signicantly than the RI increases with the increase of aqueous ethanol concentration by effectively captured ethanol molecules. More light would leak out of the ber at the interface of the cladding and GO lm compared to the interface of the cladding and aqueous ethanol. The GO coated U-bent ber would further increase the sensitivity compared to the bare U-bent ber. The concentration of ethanol can be determined by observing the light absorbance through the U-bent ber.
3.
Results and discussion
3.1. U-bent optical ber properties The U-bent probe of the sensor was observed under a SEM. The inset in Fig. 2(a) shows the SEM image of the U-bent probe. The U-bent probe is uniform and symmetrical with a 0.75 mm bend radius. The sensitivity and resolution of the U-bent bers depend on their bend radius. The relationship between the sensitivity and the bend radius was investigated through the increase in sensitivity with the bend radius decreasing from 1.7 to 0.75 mm, and the decrease in sensitivity with the bend radius
RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815 | 15809
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
RSC Advances
Communication
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for (a) the experimental setup and sensing scheme used and (b) the U-bent sensing probe. (c) The guiding mechanism of light in the U-bent optical fiber.
3.2. Characterization of the GO lm
SEM images of the side surface of (a) the unclad bare fiber and (c) after being coated with GO. (b) and (d) are magnified images of the rectangular areas marked in (a) and (c). Compared with the surface of the bare fiber in (b), GO film is clearly observed in (d). The inset in (a) is the SEM image of the unclad U-bent probe and its bend radius is 0.75 mm.
Fig. 2
decreasing from 0.75 to 0.5 mm.28 The sensitivity of the U-bent probe can be improved by applying its optimum bend radius. Hence, a U-bent probe with a 0.75 mm bend radius was selected for our experiment.
15810 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815
The images of the U-bent probe without and with GO lm are shown in Fig. 2(a) and (c) respectively. It is obvious that the ber has been coated with a GO lm tightly and completely and the GO lm has a uniform structure under high magnication. To further demonstrate the existence of GO, a contrastive U-bent probe with GO lm is shown in Fig. 2(c). One can see that the surface appearance of the U-bent probe with and without GO lm are obviously different, particularly the wrinkles that can be seen on the surface of the GO lm. Fig. 2(b) and (d) are the magnied images of the areas marked with a yellow rectangle in Fig. 2(a) and (c) respectively; it is obvious that there are wrinkles on the surface of the GO lm. In order to further characterize the GO lm, Raman spectra were obtained from the GO coated U-bent ber. The Raman spectra of the GO lm on the ber were obtained using a 532 nm laser. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the D, G, 2D and S3 bands of GO are clearly seen. The D band (1360 cm1) is assigned to the ring vibration symmetrical breathing mode and associated with the defects caused by the attachment of hydroxyl and epoxide groups. The G band (1595 cm1) is assigned to the rst-order scattering of the in-plane optical phonon E2g mode and the 2D band (2722 cm1) is assigned to the second-order process involving two phonons with opposite momentum. The S3 band (2930 cm1) is caused by the imperfect activated grouping of phonons. The Raman spectra clearly demonstrate that high-quality GO lms have coated on the U-bent probe.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
Communication
Fig. 3
RSC Advances
(a) Raman spectra of the GO film on the fiber excited with a 532 nm laser. (b) TEM image of the GO film.
The TEM image of the GO lm is shown in Fig. 3(b), an edge can be seen at the point marked with a black arrow and a darker color with the increase of layers of GO lm is also observed at the point marked with a red arrow. The TEM results indicate that the GO lm has a uniform thickness and few defects.
3.3. The performance of the U-bent optical ber sensor The performance of the UOFS was studied by monitoring the absorbance using a spectrometer when both U-bent probes were put into aqueous ethanol with concentration from 5% to 100% at room temperature. The inuence of background light was
Fig. 4 Absorbance spectra of the U-bent fiber sensor (a) uncoated and (b) coated in GO exposed to aqueous ethanol with a concentration from 5% to 100%. Dynamic absorbance response of sensor (c) uncoated and (d) coated in GO exposed to aqueous ethanol with a concentration from 5% to 100%.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815 | 15811
View Article Online
RSC Advances
Communication
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
Table 1 Sensitivity (defined as the slope of the curve given by S ¼ DA/ DC, where S is the sensitivity, A is the sensor absorbance in %, and C is the aqueous ethanol concentration in %) of the GO coated U-bent optical fiber sensor towards different aqueous ethanol concentrations. A wavelength of 655 nm was selected for the measurements
Aqueous ethanol concentration (%)
Absorbance (%)
DC
DA
Sensitivity ¼ (DA/DC)
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 8.77 16.8 19.5 23.45 25.3
— 20 20 20 20 20
— 8.77 8.03 2.7 3.95 1.85
— 0.44 0.4 0.135 0.1975 0.0925
removed by setting the soware pattern, and the light intensity with the GO coated and uncoated U-bent probes exposed to atmospheric air was used as a baseline. The absorbance spectra and dynamic absorbance response of UOFS without and with GO in a wavelength range of 500–800 nm are shown in Fig. 4(a) and (b). No matter with or without GO lm, the absorbance increases with the increase of aqueous ethanol concentration.
However, the absorbance increase of the UOFS without GO is imperceptible and indistinguishable. The absorbance variation for the UOFS with GO is signicant: 5 times larger than that without GO. This phenomenon can be attributed to the tunable RI of the GO lm with the concentration increase of the aqueous solution, which leads to a more signicant absorbance variation. The sensitive RI change of the sensing area with GO lm is introduced by the molecular enrichment properties of GO lm. Based on these results, we can draw a conclusion that GO has excellent sensing ability due to its molecular enrichment role and the large-scale changes in RI in the sensing area. Importantly, the minimum and maximum detection limit of the developed sensor can reach 5% and 100% respectively, which indicates the developed sensor possesses high resolution and sensitivity. Dynamic absorbance responses of the UOFS without and with GO are shown in Fig. 4(c) and (d) respectively. The absorbance vs. time changes with different concentration from 5% to 100% were obtained at room temperature. The detection time for each concentration is 10 s and the time interval between detections is 20 s. The UOFS with and without GO lm all exhibit visible sensitivity and fast response and recovery when
Fig. 5 Typical response–recovery characteristic curves of the developed sensor exposed to aqueous ethanol with a concentration of (a) 10% and (b) 100% at room temperature. (c) The repeatability and reversibility test towards aqueous ethanol of different concentrations and air.
15812 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
Communication
RSC Advances
The relationship between absorbance and aqueous ethanol concentration at a wavelength of (a) 550 nm, (b) 600 nm, (c) 650 nm and (d) 750 nm. A linear response range of 10–80%, with the absorbance as a function of concentration, is shown in the inset figures.
Fig. 6
U-bent probes are put in the aqueous ethanol. The dynamic absorbance for the UOFS without GO lm are distributed almost uniformly, while the dynamic absorbance for the UOFS with GO lm gradually increases. It is obvious that the absorbance variation of the UOFS without GO lm is indistinguishable with different concentrations of aqueous ethanol. The absorbance variation of the UOFS with GO lm is 5% to 25% with the concentration variation of 5% to 100%. These results agree well with the absorbance spectra in Fig. 4(a) and (b). It also demonstrates that the UOFS with GO lm can continuously detect aqueous ethanol with different concentration. Table 1 presents the sensitivity of the developed sensor between different concentrations at the wavelength of 655 nm. It is important that the developed sensor fabricated in this work exhibits high sensitivity. It was found that the sensor exhibits a considerable sensitivity between a concentration range of 0%
Table 2
Fig. 7 (a) The absorbance distribution of detection for aqueous ethanol with 50% concentration for a period of 10 days. (b) The real sample detection of Chinese liquor.
Comparison of some basic parameters for aqueous ethanol sensors
Sensor type
Detection range
Linear response range
Limit of detection
Reference
Electronic Electronic Electronic Optical Optical
1.5–7.9 mM 0–40% 82.95–497.72 mM 5–80% 5–100%
1.5–7.9 mM 0–40% 82.95–497.72 mM — 10–80%
32 mM 1% — 5% 5%
29 30 31 26 Present study
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815 | 15813
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
RSC Advances
and 40%, which is superior to the reported aqueous ethanol detection or other methods for aqueous ethanol detection.26 With increasing aqueous ethanol concentration, the sensitivity of the sensor declines. This veries that the prepared GO can act as competitive sensing layer for aqueous ethanol detection once again. The response–recovery behavior is an important parameter for estimating sensing performance. The response and recovery times of the UOFS coated with GO lm towards aqueous ethanol with concentration of 10% and 100% at room temperature were obtained, as shown in Fig. 5(a) and (b). For the concentration of 10%, the response time and recovery time of the developed sensor is 2 s and 1 s respectively. For a concentration of 100%, it is 2 s and 1 s respectively. The fast response may be due to ethanol molecule enrichment and the high surface-to-volume ratio of GO lm. The repeatability and reversibility of the UOFS coated with GO lm were investigated by continuously detection in two cycles. As shown in Fig. 5(c), the U-bent probe was continually exposed to aqueous ethanol with different concentrations under an air atmosphere. Obviously, the repeatability and reversibility of the developed sensor is very stable. Besides, the repeatable and steady results signals support that the GO lm adhered tightly to the surface of the unclad U-bent probe. Based on this work, we present a cost-effective platform for aqueous ethanol detection with high sensitivity and repeatability. In order to further investigate the relationship between absorbance and aqueous ethanol concentration, the correlation curves between the concentrations of aqueous ethanol are tted at the selected wavelengths of 550, 600, 650 and 750 nm, as shown in Fig. 6. In all cases, the absorbance increases with the increase of the aqueous ethanol concentration from 5% to 100% in a logarithmic model. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the t calibration curve for the four selected wavelengths reached 0.9846, 0.9858, 0.9881 and 0.9936, respectively. However, by focusing on the concentration range from 10% to 80%, as shown in the insets in Fig. 6, we can nd a good linear relationship between the absorbance of the U-bent sensor and the concentration. The linear tting curve can be expressed as y ¼ 0.23x + 6.05, y ¼ 0.223x + 5.93, y ¼ 0.233x + 5.393 and y ¼ 0.251x + 2.068 at the four selected wavelengths, respectively. To compare the sensing performance of the present sensor, the detecting range, linear response range and the limit of detection are compared with that of other aqueous ethanol sensors utilizing different approaches reported in the literature in the Table 2. By comparing the performance data in Table 2, besides the higher sensitivity, our sensor also has a wider detecting range and linear response range. Fig. 7(a) presents the stability testing of the developed sensor. The stability of the sensor was measured over 10 days. As can be seen, the absorbance of the sensor for aqueous ethanol of 50% concentration did not signicantly change for at least 10 days, which indicates the good stability of the sensor, also for the GO lm on the U-bent ber. Besides, in order to investigate the feasibility of our sensor for a real sample, we applied our sensor to detect the ethanol content of Chinese liquor with a certied value of 42%. Then, we calculated the
15814 | RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815
Communication
concentration using a linear tting formula according to the absorbance value as shown in Fig. 7(b) and the result of calculation is 41.6%. The result indicates the potential of the GO coated UOFS for real sample detection.
4. Conclusions A novel UOFS coated with GO lm for aqueous ethanol detection with high sensitivity, repeatability and stability was designed and demonstrated in this work. Comparing the sensing performance of the UOFS coated in GO lm and uncoated UOFS, the higher precision of the sensor coated with GO lm can be attributed to the excellent affinity of GO lm to ethanol molecules. The detecting results showed that the Ubent ber coated GO lms exhibited higher sensitivity, wider detection range and faster response–recovery time over the tapered ber coated GO lms for aqueous ethanol detecting. The absorbance increases with the increase of aqueous ethanol concentration, and an excellent quadric relationship allows the application of a cost-effective platform for aqueous ethanol detection in a range from 5% to 100%. The response and recovery times are as short as 1–2 s, which endow the developed sensor with the ability of fast detection.
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for nancial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61205174, 61401258, 11504209 and 61377043), Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2013HL049, ZR2013EMM009 and ZR2014FQ032) and the Excellent Young Scholars Research Fund of Shandong Normal University.
References 1 P. L. Jia and H. S. Wang, Sens. Actuators, B, 2013, 177, 1035– 1042. 2 P. Dutta, I. Matias, C. Aramburu, A. Bakas, M. Lopez-Amo and J. M. Oton, Microw. Opt. Tech. Lett., 1996, 11, 93–95. 3 J. Villatoro, D. Luna-Moreno and D. Monzon-Hernandez, Sens. Actuators, B, 2005, 110, 23–27. 4 N. Nath, S. R. Jain and S. Anand, Biosens. Bioelectron., 1997, 12, 491–498. 5 R. Bharadwaj, V. V. R. Sai, K. Thakare, A. Dhawangale, T. Kundu, S. Titus, P. K. Verma and S. Mukherji, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2001, 26, 3367–3370. 6 P. H. Paul and G. Kouchakoff, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1987, 51, 12– 14. 7 V. Ruddy, Fiber Integr. Opt., 1990, 9, 142–150. 8 V. Ruddy, B. D. MacCraith and J. A. Murphy, J. Appl. Phys., 1990, 67, 6070–6074. 9 S. K. Girei, A. A. Shabana, K. T. Arasu, S. Painam and M. H. Yaacob, IEEE Int. Conf. Photonics, 4th, 2013, 275–277. 10 F. B. Xiong and D. Sisler, Opt. Commun., 2010, 283, 1326– 1330. 11 M. Yang, Y. Sun, D. Zhang and D. Jiang, Sens. Actuators, B, 2010, 143, 750–753.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
View Article Online
Published on 29 January 2016. Downloaded by CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY on 12/01/2017 13:29:40.
Communication
12 M. Iga, A. Seki and K. Watanabe, Sens. Actuators, B, 2004, 101, 368–372. 13 D. Monzoon-Hernandez, V. Joel, D. Talavera and D. LunaMoreno, Appl. Opt., 2004, 43, 1216–1220. 14 S. K. Srivastava, R. Verma and B. D. Gupta, Sens. Actuators, B, 2011, 153, 194–198. 15 A. K. Mishra, S. K. Mishra and B. D. Gupta, Opt. Commun., 2015, 344, 86–91. 16 A. Leung, P. M. Shankar and R. Mutharasan, Sens. Actuators, B, 2007, 125, 688–703. 17 Y. M. Wong, R. J. Scully, H. J. Kadim, V. Alexiou and R. J. Bartlett, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt., 2003, 5, S51–S58. 18 A. Kumar, T. V. B. Subrahmonium, A. D. Sharma, K. Thyagarajan, B. P. Pal and I. C. Goyal, Electron. Lett., 1984, 20, 534. 19 H. W. Qiu, S. S. Gao, P. X. Chen, Z. Li, X. Y. Liu, C. Zhang, Y. Y. Xu, S. Z. Jiang, C. Yang, Y. Y. Huo and W. W. Yue, Opt. Commun., 2016, 366, 275–281. 20 D. Littlejohn, D. Lucas and L. Han, Appl. Spectrosc., 1999, 53, 845–849. 21 B. D. Gupta, H. Dodeja and A. K. Tomar, Opt. Quantum Electron., 1996, 28, 1629–1639.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
RSC Advances
22 Y. Liu, X. Dong and P. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2283. 23 I. V. Lightcap and P. V. Kamat, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 2235–2243. 24 H. Ma, D. Wu, Z. Cui, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, B. Du and Q. Wei, Anal. Lett., 2013, 46, 1–17. 25 G. Eda, G. Fanchini and M. Chhowalla, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2008, 3, 270–274. 26 A. A. Shabaneha, S. H. Gireia, P. T. Arasua, W. B. W. A. Rahmanc, A. A. A. Bakarc, A. Z. Sadekd, H. N. Lime, N. M. Huangf and M. H. Yaacoba, Opt. Commun., 2014, 331, 320–324. 27 N. M. Huang, H. N. Lim, C. H. Chia, M. A. Yarmo and M. R. Muhamad, Int. J. Nanomed., 2011, 6, 3443–3448. 28 S. K. Khijwania and B. D. Gupta, Opt. Commun., 2000, 175, 135–137. 29 E. T. Hayes, B. K. Bellingham, H. Mark and A. Galal, Electrochim. Acta, 1996, 41, 337–344. 30 X. Xu, A. V. Goponenko and S. A. Asher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 3113–3119. 31 Y. C. Weng, J. F. Rick and T. C. Chou, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2004, 20, 41–51.
RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 15808–15815 | 15815