ACCP 2013 - Breathe Technologies

12 downloads 162 Views 2MB Size Report
CASE REPORT: USING A “TASTE TEST” TO PROVIDE. CHOICES OF NONINVASIVE VENTILATION SYSTEMS. Larry Nguyen DO, Gina Eickhoff RRT, Debbie ...
CASE REPORT: USING A “TASTE TEST” TO PROVIDE CHOICES OF NONINVASIVE VENTILATION SYSTEMS Larry Nguyen DO, Gina Eickhoff RRT, Debbie Rose RN BSN MHA, Herbert Patrick MD MSEE FCCP Mercy Health System – Mercy Suburban Hospital, East Norriton, PA, USA Introduction Hospitalized patients receive noninvasive (NIV) for several reasons, including reduction in work of breathing, increasing minute ventilation, improving oxygenation and hopefully avoidance of intubation. However, many patients find they are uncomfortable with NIV systems with nasal or oronasal masks and decline physician prescribed treatments. We hypothesized that if patients could "taste test" a selection of NIV systems with various facial interfaces and generators, they could identify the most comfortable set up. Use of their selected set up might improve NIV compliance.

Respironics Vision

® BiPAP

Following the "Taste Test" of the three systems, the RCP asked the patient to rank each on a scale from 1, uncomfortable, to 10, comfortable. Despite rank, any system failing to provide adequate oxygenation and/or ventilation was eliminated for use. Patient Rank (1, uncomfortable to 10, comfortable): 4/10

Fisher & Paykel OptiFlow™ Nasal High Flow (NHF)

Three NIV systems were trialed: ® Respironics Vision (BiPAP ), Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Inc. OptiFlow™ nasal high flow (NHF), and Breathe BT-V2S Noninvasive Open Ventilation (NIOV™). The physician ordered settings for each NIV system were applied by one Respiratory Care Practitioner (RCP).

The remaining NIV system with the highest rank was then continued on the patient.

Conclusions In this case, the patient preferred the NIOV™ system compared to the BiPAP® and to the OptiFlow™.

Methods An 58 year old male ICU patient with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) was selected. His ABG on 2 LPM NC O2 was 7.26, 56, 77, 25 and 95%.

Methods (con’t)

Patient Rank (1, uncomfortable to 10, comfortable): 1/10

Breathe BT-V2S Noninvasive Open Ventilation (NIOV™)

He was able to ambulate using the NIOV™ system and was discharged to a SNF with this NIV system.

Clinical Implications The “Taste Test” could be performed on other NIV systems, such as the Vapotherm High Flow Nasal Cannula and the Hayek Biphasic Cuirass (BCV). References Caples SM, Gay PC. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the intensive care unit: A concise review. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2651– 2658S. Liesching T, Kwok H, Hill NS. Acute applications of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Chest 2003; 124:699-713.

Patient Rank (1, uncomfortable to 10, comfortable): 9/10

Celikel T, Sungur M, Ceyhan B, et al: Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. Chest 1998; 114:1636–1642.