Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism ... - Plant Physiology

3 downloads 0 Views 653KB Size Report
respectively (Bennett et al., 1996; Chen et al., 1999;. Terasaka et al., 2005). ..... 1966; Luschnig et al., 1998; Clay and Nelson, 2005). To examine a potential role ...
Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism and Cap Morphogenesis in Arabidopsis1[W][OA] Li-Sen Young2, Benjamin R. Harrison, Narayana Murthy U.M.3, Barbara A. Moffatt, Simon Gilroy, and Patrick H. Masson* Laboratory of Genetics (L.-S.Y., B.R.H., N.M.U.M., P.H.M.) and Plant Breeding and Plant Genetics Program (L.-S.Y.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 (B.A.M.); and Biology Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 (S.G.)

Adenosine kinase (ADK) is a key enzyme that regulates intra- and extracellular levels of adenosine, thereby modulating methyltransferase reactions, production of polyamines and secondary compounds, and cell signaling in animals. Unfortunately, little is known about ADK’s contribution to the regulation of plant growth and development. Here, we show that ADK is a modulator of root cap morphogenesis and gravitropism. Upon gravistimulation, soluble ADK levels and activity increase in the root tip. Mutation in one of two Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ADK genes, ADK1, results in cap morphogenesis defects, along with alterations in root sensitivity to gravistimulation and slower kinetics of root gravitropic curvature. The kinetics defect can be partially rescued by adding spermine to the growth medium, whereas the defects in cap morphogenesis and gravitropic sensitivity cannot. The root morphogenesis and gravitropism defects of adk1-1 are accompanied by altered expression of the PIN3 auxin efflux facilitator in the cap and decreased expression of the auxin-responsive DR5-GUS reporter. Furthermore, PIN3 fails to relocalize to the bottom membrane of statocytes upon gravistimulation. Consequently, adk1-1 roots cannot develop a lateral auxin gradient across the cap, necessary for the curvature response. Interestingly, adk1-1 does not affect gravity-induced cytoplasmic alkalinization of the root statocytes, suggesting either that ADK1 functions between cytoplasmic alkalinization and PIN3 relocalization in a linear pathway or that the pH and PIN3-relocalization responses to gravistimulation belong to distinct branches of the pathway. Our data are consistent with a role for ADK and the S-adenosyl-Lmethionine pathway in the control of root gravitropism and cap morphogenesis.

The primary roots of most plants perceive their orientation within the gravity field mainly through the sedimentation of starch-filled plastids within the columella cells of the root cap (Blancaflor and Masson, 2003). There, a largely unknown transduction pathway is activated upon root reorientation, resulting in fast and transient alkalinization of the cytoplasm (Scott and Allen, 1999; Fasano et al., 2001), acidification of the apoplast (Scott and Allen, 1999; Fasano et al., 2001),

1 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (to P.H.M. and S.G.), by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (to P.H.M. and S.G.), by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Graduate School (Hatch funds and a grant-in-aid to P.H.M.), and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to B.A.M.). This is manuscript number 3630 of the Laboratory of Genetics. 2 Present address: Hung-Yang Bio-Tech, Taichung City, Taiwan. 3 Present address: Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. * Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected]; fax 608– 262–2976. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Patrick H. Masson ([email protected]). [W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data. [OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription. www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.106.084798

564

and induction of lateral cell polarity with accumulation of the PIN3 auxin efflux facilitator at the new lower side of the cells (Friml et al., 2002). Consequently, a lateral gradient of auxin forms across the root cap, which can be observed indirectly by the asymmetrical activation of expression of auxin-responsive reporters, such as DR5-GUS or DR5-GFP (Boonsirichai et al., 2003; Ottenschla¨ger et al., 2003), at the bottom flank of the cap. This gradient of auxin is then transmitted basipetally through cell files using a transport system that involves auxin influx and efflux carriers, such as the AUX1, PGP4, and AGR1/EIR1/PIN2/WAV6 proteins, respectively (Bennett et al., 1996; Chen et al., 1999; Terasaka et al., 2005). At the elongation zones, the gravity-induced auxin gradient, probably coupled with other signals, promotes a complex differential cellular elongation between upper and lower flanks, resulting in gravitropic curvature (Blancaflor and Masson, 2003). Other than those that affect starch synthesis or accumulation in columella amyloplasts, only a few genes have thus far been uncovered through genetic screens for their involvement in gravity signal transduction within the root statocytes (Blancaflor and Masson, 2003). Mutations in the ARG1 gene affect root and hypocotyl gravitropism without altering rootgrowth responses to phytohormones and polar auxin transport inhibitors, or phototropism. The ARG1 gene encodes a J-domain peripheral membrane protein that is associated with components of the vesicular

Plant Physiology, October 2006, Vol. 142, pp. 564–573, www.plantphysiol.org Ó 2006 American Society of Plant Biologists

Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism

trafficking pathway and is needed for lateral auxin transport across the root cap and for gravity-induced cytoplasmic alkalinization (Boonsirichai et al., 2003). One of its paralogs, ARL2, also contributes to root and hypocotyl gravitropism and appears to function in the same genetic pathway (Guan et al., 2003). In this article, we show that adenosine kinase (ADK; EC2.7.1.20; ATP), an enzyme that converts adenosine (Ado) into AMP using one molecule of ATP (Moffatt et al., 2000), also modulates root gravitropism and cap morphogenesis in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ADK is a key player in the S-adenosyl-L-Met (AdoMet) cycle, which provides methyl groups for a variety of transmethylation reactions involved in the metabolism of molecules as diverse as pectin, lignin, flavonoids, phosphatidyl choline, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, salicylic acid, jasmonate, etc., as well as in DNA methylation and mRNA capping (Moffatt et al., 2000). AdoMet is also a precursor in the biosynthesis of ethylene and polyamines. Ado, on the other hand, is a by-product of the AdoMet cycle and a feedback inhibitor of AdoMet regeneration. Therefore, ADK’s function in converting Ado into AMP is essential to avoid feedback inhibition of the pathway and its derived branches (Moffatt et al., 2000; Schoor and Moffatt, 2004). Here, we show that soluble ADK levels and ADK activity increase in the root tip within 12 min of gravistimulation. Mutation in one of two Arabidopsis ADK genes, ADK1, results in altered gravisensitivity, abnormal cap morphology, and delayed kinetics of the root curvature response to gravistimulation. These defects are associated with altered expression and distribution of PIN3 in the root cap, an inability for PIN3 to relocalize in the statocytes upon gravistimulation, and a lack of asymmetrical activation of DR5GUS expression in the lower flank of the root cap upon gravistimulation. Spermine, an AdoMet-derived product of the cycle, can partially rescue the delay in kinetics of root gravitropism when added to the growth medium. However, this polyamine cannot rescue the cap morphological defect and altered gravisensitivity of adk1-1 roots. Our results are discussed in view of ADK’s contribution to the modulation of root gravitropism and cap morphogenesis in plants.

soluble protein spots identified in this screen was found to increase in staining intensity 1.8-fold during the first 12 min of a graviresponse (Fig. 1), and this increase was reproducible (three repeats). This protein spot did not change in intensity when seedlings were subjected to similar rotation for 30 s before return to the vertical for the remaining time, indicating that the change in spot intensity observed upon 12 min of gravistimulation did not derive from the mechanostimulus that typically accompanies plate rotation (Kimbrough et al., 2004). Mass spectrometric analysis of this protein revealed a sequence tag that matches Arabidopsis ATP: adenosine 5#-phosphotransferase (EC2.7.1.20), also referred to as ADK in this article (Supplemental Fig. S1, A and B). Western-blot analysis of total protein extracts using an anti-ADK antibody (Moffatt et al., 2000) confirmed the increase in ADK protein abundance relative to a histone H3 loading control upon gravistimulation (Supplemental Fig. S2). Furthermore, the gravityinduced changes in ADK protein abundance in the Tris-soluble fraction correlated with changes in ADK enzymatic activity in total root-tip extracts, which increased from 21.4 6 1.2 units in control root tips to 26.5 6 1.4 units after 12 min of gravistimulation (P 5 4.5 3 1026, t test). Reverse Genetics Reveals a Role for ADK1 in the Modulation of Root Gravitropism

Arabidopsis encodes two ADK isoforms: ADK1 (AAG45246) and ADK2 (AAG45249). The corresponding genes are expressed ubiquitously, although ADK1 is expressed more highly than ADK2 in the root tip, including the cap columella cells (Schoor and Moffatt, 2004; Nawy et al., 2005). The steady-state levels of their transcripts are not altered in the root tip in response to gravistimulation (Kimbrough et al., 2004), suggesting the gravity-induced changes observed in our proteomic studies are posttranscriptional. ADK1 and ADK2 are 92% identical in amino acid sequence and 56% identical to human ADK (Mathews et al., 1998; Supplemental Fig. S1C). The sequence tag

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A Proteomic Approach Identifies ADK as Potential Modulator of Root Gravitropism

To gain further insights into the molecular mechanisms that modulate gravity signal transduction in roots, we used a proteomic approach based on comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to identify root tip proteins whose abundance fluctuates early in response to gravistimulation (N. Murthy U.M., L.-S. Young, G. Sabat, and P.H. Masson, unpublished data). One of the differentially represented Tris bufferPlant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Figure 1. ADK protein responses to gravistimulation. Silver-stained 2-DE gels showing several Tris-soluble protein spots, including ADK (white arrowhead), from control (left 2-DE image) and 12-min gravistimulated (right 2-DE image) Arabidopsis root tips. On the right of the 2-DE images, a bar graph generated by PDQuest (Bio-Rad) shows the normalized ADK spot intensity (n 5 3; SE # 0.17-fold the average value) in unstimulated controls (left bar) and 12-min (right bar) gravistimulated samples. Quantification of the maximum bar is represented on the right of the graph, in parts per million as a normalization unit (PPM). The control bar is drawn in proportion of the highest bar. A standard spot number provided by the software is indicated at the bottom of the graph. 565

Young et al.

identified by mass spectrometric analysis of the differentially represented protein spot did not allow distinction between the two isoforms (Supplemental Fig. S1, B and C). To investigate the role of these proteins in gravity signal transduction, we characterized the gravitropic phenotypes of plants homozygous for either adk1-1 or adk2-1, two recessive alleles that carry T-DNA insertions in the last exon of the corresponding genes. In both cases, the insertion is upstream of codons encoding highly conserved amino acids that are essential for substrate binding (Mathews et al., 1998), and reverse transcription-PCR did not detect transcripts 3# of the T-DNA insertion site in adk1-1 (A. Sundøs-Larsson, personal communication). Furthermore, ADK activities were low in adk1-1 and adk2-1 mutant leaves, reaching 46.9% 6 3.5% and 56.7% 6 6.4% of wild-type levels, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (P , 0.05, t test). adk1-1 adk2-1 double mutants could not be tested because they are embryonic lethal (B. Moffatt, unpublished data). adk1-1 displays altered root gravitropism either in light or darkness (Fig. 2, A and B), while its hypocotyl retains wild-type gravitropism kinetics (Fig. 2C). The root gravitropism defect of adk1-1 is rescued by expression of a wild-type ADK1 transgene (Fig. 2D, lines F3-A and F3-N), demonstrating that it is a consequence of the adk1-1 mutation. adk2-1, on the other hand, displays wild-type kinetics of root curvature in response to 90° gravistimulation. This lack of a gravitropic phenotype for adk2-1 could reflect a lack of involvement of ADK2 in root gravitropism, indicate that the ADK activity associated with the more highly expressed ADK1 isoform is sufficient for full graviresponsiveness in adk2-1, or result from ecotype differences. To determine if ADK1 is required for the differential growth that drives the root graviresponse, we examined root-growth rate and root-growth response to exogenous auxin. Results shown in Figure 3A indicate that the roots of light-exposed 4-d-old adk1-1 seedlings grow slowly but eventually reach near wild-type rate after 36 h. On the other hand, under our growth conditions, the roots and hypocotyls of etiolated mutant seedlings grow at wild-type rates (Fig. 3B). Hence, reduced growth rate does not seem to be responsible for the gravitropic defect of adk1-1 roots. Similarly, adk1-1 roots display almost wild-type root-growth response to the exogenous auxin IAA (Fig. 3C), with

Figure 2. adk1-1 roots display altered kinetics of gravitropic curvature and decreased sensitivity to gravistimulation. A, Root reorientation kinetics in light of wild-type Ler, Columbia, adk1-1, and adk2-1 mutant seedlings after vertically oriented plates were rotated 90° at time zero (n 5 88–92). B, Root reorientation kinetics in darkness of Ler and adk1-1 (n 5 90–108). C, Hypocotyl reorientation in darkness of Ler and adk1-1 (n 5 70–90). D, Functional complementation of the adk1-1 gravitropic phenotype by a wild-type ADK1 transgene. Root gravitropism of wild-type Ler, adk1-1, and progeny of two independent adk1-1 566

transformants carrying the pKWG-ADK1 complementation construct (F3-A and F3-N, respectively; n 5 90–107). E, Presentation time of Ler and adk1-1 (n 5 86–98). The thick lines correspond to the best-fit logarithmic functions associated with the observed data. The x-intercepts of these lines correspond to the predicted presentation time. Correlation coefficients are 0.93 for Ler and 0.97 for adk1-1. In A through D, asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P , 0.05), and error bars represent SEs. The data shown here are derived from one representative experiment, which was repeated once in A, C, and D and twice in B and E, with similar results. Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism

tially affected in the mutant. Consistent with this conclusion, the AGR1/EIR1/PIN2/WAV6 efflux facilitator, which contributes to basipetal auxin transport in roots, was properly expressed and distributed at the correct location within transporting cells of adk1-1 root tips (Supplemental Fig. S3, A and B). ADK1 Contributes to Gravity Signal Transduction in the Root Statocytes

Figure 3. adk1-1 shows wild-type response to exogenously applied IAA and NPA. A, Root-growth rates for three successive 12-h periods (first [12], second [24], and third [36]) of 4-d-old wild-type Ler and adk1-1 seedlings under constant light (n 5 72–98). B, Hypocotyl and root lengths of 4-d-old Ler and adk1-1 seedlings grown in darkness (n 5 21). C and D, Root-growth response of wild-type Ler and adk1-1 seedlings in the presence of exogenously applied IAA and NPA (n 5 33–41). Relative root growth was calculated as a percentage of growth in the presence of a specific concentration of the compound over growth of untreated plants. All values are means 6 SEs for each time point. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (P , 0.05, t test). The data presented here derive from one representative experiment, which was repeated once in A, B, and D, and twice in C, with similar results.

only a minor enhancement of their sensitivity to 5 nM IAA, and wild-type sensitivity to naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA), an inhibitor of auxin efflux activity during polar auxin transport (Muday and DeLong, 2001). These data suggest that the auxin response or NPAsensitive components of its transport are not substanPlant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

To investigate the possibility that adk1-1 might be affected in early phases of gravity signal transduction, we analyzed the root curvature response to short doses of gravistimulation and used a logarithmic best-fit model (Perbal et al., 2002) to evaluate gravitropic sensitivity. Results shown in Figure 2E indicate that the minimal gravistimulation time needed for induction of gravitropic curvature (presentation time) is 0.86 min for wild-type Landsberg erecta (Ler) roots (correlation coefficient of 0.93) and 8.94 min for adk1-1 roots (correlation coefficient of 0.97). Because gravity signal transduction occurs in the columella cells of the root cap, we analyzed possible effects of adk1-1 on root cap morphology. While wildtype root caps typically contain three tiers of columella cells (Supplemental Fig. S4A), most adk1-1 root caps are disorganized, containing varying numbers of differently sized columella cells in each tier (Supplemental Fig. S4A). However, mutant columella cells still contain starch-filled plastids (Supplemental Fig. S4B, left), suggesting their differentiation is not altered. Interestingly, the morphological defects of adk1-1 root caps closely resemble those of scr-1 (Sabatini et al., 2003). However, scr-1 roots display wild-type kinetics of gravitropism (Supplemental Fig. S4C), as previously reported (Fukaki et al., 1998), and wild-type presentation time (Supplemental Fig. S4D). Therefore, the reduced graviresponse associated with adk1-1 is likely not a direct result of its cap morphological defect, although it remains possible that the mechanism that governs altered cap morphology in adk1-1 differs from that responsible for the same phenotype in scr-1 and affects root gravitropism. adk1-1 Affects PIN3 Expression and Relocalization to the Lower Membrane of Root Statocytes upon Gravistimulation

Because gravistimulation promotes a redistribution of the PIN3 auxin efflux facilitator to the lower membrane of the root statocytes (Friml et al., 2002), we immunolocalized the PIN3 protein in vertically grown and gravistimulated adk1-1 and Ler roots. In vertically oriented Ler root tips, the PIN3 signal was often seen symmetrically distributed at the periphery of statocytes in tiers 2 and 3 of the cap without preferential bias toward specific sides (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, in vertically oriented adk1-1 roots, PIN3 signals often showed uneven distribution, displaying asymmetrical localization to one or more sides of the statocytes 567

Young et al.

Figure 4. PIN3 and DR5-GUS expression in adk1-1 and scr-1 mutant root tips. A to D, PIN3 immunolocalization of vertically growing Ler (A), adk1-1 (B), ecotype Wassilewskija (Ws; C), and scr-1 (D). E to H, PIN3 immunolocalization of 30-min gravistimulated Ler (E), adk1-1 (F), Ws (G), and scr-1 (H). Arrowheads indicate asymmetrically localized PIN3 signals in gravistimulated statocytes. I to L, DR5-GUS expression in wild-type (I and J) and adk1-1 mutant (K and L) root tips grown vertically (I and K) or gravistimulated for 2.5 h (J and L). In all segments, direction of the gravity vector (g) is as indicated with an arrow. Note that asymmetry in GUS staining (arrowheads) in wild type (J) is missing in adk1-1 (I). The inset in A indicates pin3-4 negative control. Scale bars (white in A–H, black in I–L) represent 20 mm in A and E and 10 mm in the other segments. The images shown here are representatives of two experiments. The numbers of roots showing distinct patterns of PIN3 localization or DR5GUS expression in control and gravistimulated seedlings are reported in Tables I and II, respectively.

(Fig. 4B). Furthermore, while four columns of S2 and S3 columella cells consistently displayed PIN3 signals in mid-plane optical sections of Ler root tips (Fig. 4A), only three to five central statocytes detectably expressed PIN3 in adk1-1 roots (Fig. 4B). After 30 min of gravistimulation, PIN3 was localized to the new bottom side of the columella cells in 10 out of the 17 Ler root tips observed (Fig. 4E) and to the new upper side in three other Ler roots, whereas the remaining four roots retained symmetrical PIN3 localization (data not shown; Table I). These data give a relocalization index (RIPIN3) of 41 for 30-min gravistimulated Ler root tips (see ‘‘Materials and Methods’’; Table I). In contrast, analysis of PIN3 distribution in 30-min gravistimulated adk1-1 root tips revealed a slightly negative RIPIN3 for this mutant (Table I; Fig. 4F), suggesting a defect in PIN3 relocalization. Importantly, the effect of adk1-1 on PIN3 expression and localization in the root cap appears specific, as expression and distribution of two other root-tip-expressed efflux facilitators (Blilou et al., 2005) appear normal in this mutant (Supplemental Fig. S3, A and B, and C and D, respectively). Furthermore, abnormal root-tip morphology does not appear to be directly responsible for adk1-1’s inability to relocalize PIN3 in the statocytes upon gravistimulation because similar gravistimuli promote PIN3 relocalization in scr-1 root statocytes 568

despite abnormal root cap morphology (Fig. 4, G and H; Table I). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the mechanism that drives altered cap morphology in adk1-1 also affects expression and relocalization of PIN3 in mutant statocytes. adk1-1 Affects Expression of the Auxin-Responsive DR5-GUS Reporter Construct in the Root Tip

Altered distribution of PIN3 in the statocytes of vertical and gravistimulated adk1-1 roots suggests Table I. Patterns of PIN3 accumulation in the columella cells of 30-min gravistimulated wild-type and mutant root tips Ler adk1-1 Ws scr-1

Bota

Topb

No Biasc

Total

RIPIN3d

10 1 9 9

3 2 0 0

4 10 3 3

17 13 12 12

41% 28% 75% 75%

a Localization of PIN3 toward the new bottom side of columella cells b in gravity-stimulated root tips. Localization of PIN3 toward the c new topside of columella cells in gravity-stimulated root tips. No bias of PIN3 localization toward top or bottom sides of the columella d cells. RIPIN3 of PIN3 5 100 3 (no. of samples showing bottom localization of PIN3 2 no. of samples showing top PIN3 localization)/ total.

Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism

potential alterations in lateral auxin transport in the root cap, with possible effects on auxin accumulation in the root tip. To investigate this possibility, we analyzed expression of an auxin-responsive DR5-GUS (Boonsirichai et al., 2003) reporter construct in wildtype and adk1-1 mutant roots. In wild-type root tips, strong GUS signal was detected in the central region of the root cap and in the vasculature (Fig. 4I). Upon gravistimulation, the GUS signal extended into the lower flank of the root cap, indicating gravistimulusinduced lateral auxin transport (Boonsirichai et al., 2003). When analyzed after 6 h of gravistimulation (a time sufficient to promote a visible curvature response that can be used to unambiguously define the ‘‘up’’ and ‘‘down’’ flanks of most root tips under a microscope), the GUS signal had extended to the lower flank of the root tip in 47 wild-type seedlings out of the 104 tested, whereas it extended to the opposite, upper flank of only 19 gravistimulated seedlings, leading to an expression index for DR5-GUS (EIDR5_GUS) of 27 (see ‘‘Materials and Methods’’; Table II). When stained in the same vial as the wild type, vertically grown adk1-1 roots showed patchy GUS staining in the root cap (Fig. 4K), and staining was less intense in the mutant than in the wild type (Fig. 4, I and K). These data suggest that adk1-1 root tips accumulate less auxin in a smaller number of statocytes than wild type, likely explaining their cap morphological defects (Blilou et al., 2005). After gravistimulation, adk1-1 roots showed no evidence of preferential lateral GUS activation at the bottom flank of the cap (Fig. 4L; Table II), indicating a defect in gravityinduced auxin redistribution for this mutant. It should be noted here that almost 50% of wild-type or mutant seedlings displayed asymmetrical DR5GUS expression extending to one of the root-cap flanks

Table II. Patterns of DR5-GUS expression in the root cap of 6-h gravistimulated, 4- to 5-d-old wild-type Ler and adk1-1 mutant seedlings Cumulative data from three separate experiments, each showing similar trends.

even in the absence of gravistimulation (Table II). Such differential expression could reflect some random fluctuations in DR5-GUS expression in lateral root cap cells, represent a response to uncharacterized lateral stimuli, or be an experimental artifact during GUS staining. However, the preferential activation of DR5-GUS expression on the lower flank of 6-h gravistimulated wild-type roots is highly significant (P , 0.05, t test), strongly supporting a role for the gravity signal transduction pathway in promoting DR5-GUS expression in lateral cap cells at the lower flank of horizontal roots. adk1-1 Does Not Affect Cytoplasmic Alkalinization of the Root Statocytes upon Gravistimulation

Gravistimulation also promotes a cytoplasmic alkalinization of wild-type root-cap statocytes, and this output is necessary for full graviresponse (Scott and Allen, 1999; Fasano et al., 2001). Therefore, we investigated whether adk1-1 also affects gravity-induced cytoplasmic alkalinization of root-cap statocytes. Results showed no significant differences in cytoplasmic pH between Ler and adk1-1 root statocytes, both before (t 5 0 min; pH 5 7.17 6 0.6 and 7.05 6 0.5, respectively) and during (t 5 2.5 min; pH 5 7.6 6 0.7 and 7.4 6 0.5, respectively) a graviresponse (P . 0.05, t test). Hence, adk1-1 does not affect this energyconsuming physiological output of gravity signal transduction, implying that the gravitropic defect associated with adk1-1 is not a simple consequence of altered energy balance within the statocytes. This result also suggests either that ADK1 functions between cytoplasmic alkalinization and PIN3 relocalization in a linear pathway, or that gravity-induced cytoplasmic alkalinization and PIN3 redistribution in root-cap statocytes are outputs of distinct gravity signal transduction pathways. Recent observations of a differential effect of adk1-1 on the transcriptional responses to gravistimulation of three fast gravityresponding, root-tip-expressed genes support the existence of branched pathways in root gravity signal transduction (Yester et al., 2006).

Bottomb Topc Biasd No Biase Totalf EIDR5-GUSg

Vertical Ler adk1-1 6-h GSa Ler adk1-1

56 69 47 42

19 45

a

48 49 38 63 b

104 118 104 150

Spermine Partially Rescues the Root Gravitropic Defect of adk1-1 27 22

Seedlings were gravistimulated for 6 h. Number of gravistimulated roots showing DR5-GUS expression in lateral cap cells at the c lower sides of the root. Number of gravistimulated roots showing DR5-GUS expression in lateral cap cells at the upper sides of the d root. Number of vertical roots showing asymmetrical activation of DR5-GUS expression in the lateral cap cells on one side of the e root. Number of vertical roots showing symmetrical DR5-GUS f expression limited to the central columns of columella cells. Total g EIDR5-GUS 5 100 3 (no. of roots number of root tips analyzed. showing DR5-GUS expression in cells at the bottom flank of the cap – no. of roots showing DR5-GUS expression in cells at the top flank of the cap)/total number of roots analyzed. Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

As discussed above, the main substrate of ADK in plants, Ado, feedback inhibits the AdoMet cycle (Moffatt et al., 2000). Interestingly, at least two secondary products derived from this pathway were previously proposed to modulate polar auxin transport: polyamines and ethylene (Morgan and Gausman, 1966; Luschnig et al., 1998; Clay and Nelson, 2005). To examine a potential role for these compounds in the gravitropic defect of adk1-1, we analyzed root gravitropism in wild-type and adk1-1 mutant seedlings in the presence of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), a precursor of ethylene, and spermine. Adding ACC to the medium at concentrations varying 569

Young et al.

from 0.1 to 10 mM did not rescue the gravitropic and cap morphogenesis defects of adk1-1 (Supplemental Fig. S5; data not shown). Spermine, on the other hand, appeared to rescue the gravitropic defect of adk1-1 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). However, increasing its concentration from 100 to 200 mM did not result in additional increases in adk1-1 curvature after 11 h of gravistimulation (57° 6 2.2 at 200 mM versus 59° 6 2.9 at 100 mM; P 5 0.47, t test; n 5 112–116), indicating that the spermine dose-response curve of adk1-1 reached saturation at 100 mM. Spermine had no affect on the gravitropic response of wild-type Ler roots (Fig. 5A), implying that its ability to partially rescue the gravitropic defect of adk1-1 roots is specific to plants with a lesion in ADK. To further investigate the possible role of spermine in the regulation of root gravitropism, we analyzed the effect of an inhibitor of polyamines synthesis, methyl glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) (MGBG; Williams-Ashman and Seidenfeld, 1986), on adk1-1 and wild-type Ler roots. Figure 5B shows that MGBG at concentrations varying from 50 to 500 mM significantly

Table III. Levels of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine in 2-week-old wild-type Ler and adk1-1 mutant seedlings Sample

Putrescine

Spermidine 21

nmol g

Ler adk1-1

45.5 6 4.1 44.6 6 1.5

Spermine

fresh weight

99.3 6 3.9 99.0 6 3.4

26.3 6 0.8 21.7 6 0.5a

a

Statistically significant difference between adk1-1 and wild type (P 5 9.4 3 1025, t test).

inhibits wild-type root gravitropism but does not affect the response of adk1-1. Together, our data indicate that spermine is important for full graviresponse in roots and suggest that spermine deficiency in adk1-1 is partially responsible for altered kinetics of root gravitropism. Consistent with this interpretation, adk1-1 mutant seedlings were found to contain less spermine than wild type (Table III; P 5 9.4 1025, t test), whereas putrescine and spermidine levels were not affected by the mutation

Figure 5. Exogenous spermine partially rescues the kinetics of root gravitropism in adk1-1 without affecting its presentation time. A and B, Kinetics of wild-type and adk1-1 root gravitropism in the presence of spermine (Spm; A) or MGBG (an inhibitor of polyamines biosynthesis; B). C, Presentation time of Ler and adk1-1. The continuous and dotted lines correspond to the best-fit logarithmic functions associated with the observed data for Ler and adk1-1, respectively. The x-intercepts of these lines correspond to the predicted presentation time. Correlation coefficients are 0.90 for Ler exposed to 0 or 100 mM spermine, and 0.86 and 0.74 for adk1-1 exposed to 0 or 100 mM spermine, respectively. Compound concentrations (in mM) and genotypes are indicated in the legend in each segment. All values are means 6 SEs for each time point (n 5 72–99 for A; 84–160 for B; and 45–79 for C). For A and B, asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the control without compound (P , 0.05, t test). The data represented here derive from one experiment that was repeated once with similar results. 570

Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism

(t test P values of 0.42 and 0.78, respectively; Table III). The effect of spermine deficiency on root gravitropism could reflect an ability for polyamines to modulate polar auxin transport, as recently suggested by Clay and Nelson (2005). However, spermine deficiency is likely not responsible for altered gravitropic sensitivity in adk1-1 roots (presentation time), as this aspect of the phenotype was not rescued by exposing mutant seedlings to 100 mM spermine (Fig. 5C). Similarly, altered cap morphology in this mutant was not rescued by spermine treatment (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

In summary, our data indicate that adk1-1 alters root gravitropism by affecting both gravitropic sensitivity and curvature kinetics. The curvature kinetics defect is partly rescued by adding spermine to the medium, suggesting a role for this polyamine in the process. This conclusion is in line with recent observations suggesting a role for polyamines in the control of polar auxin transport in roots (Clay and Nelson, 2005). While adk1-1 shows almost wild-type root growth sensitivity to auxin and NPA (Fig. 3, C and D), and the AGR1/EIR1/PIN2/WAV6 auxin-efflux facilitator is normally expressed and distributed in mutant roots (Supplemental Fig. S3), it is possible that distribution and/or activity of auxin influx carriers are/is altered in lateral root cap or epidermal cells of adk1-1 roots due to spermine deficiency. Alternatively, adk1-1 could also affect the transport or activity of other gravitropic signals. For instance, cytokinins, which may provide such a signaling function in roots (Aloni et al., 2004), are likely to be affected by adk1-1, as they serve as substrates for ADK activity and are targeted by several AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases (Schoor and Moffatt, 2004). On the other hand, gravitropic sensitivity and cap morphology defects of adk1-1 could not be rescued by addition of spermine or ACC to the medium, suggesting that different mechanisms might modulate this aspect of gravitropic regulation by ADK. Gravityinduced PIN3 redistribution to the lower membrane of root-cap statocytes was proposed to involve the cycling of vesicles between the plasma membrane and endosome (Friml et al., 2002; Boutte et al., 2006). In animal models, ADK-controlled extracellular Ado regulates multiple cellular processes, including neurotransmitter release (Buck, 2004). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that similar Ado effects on vesicular trafficking might be responsible for the phenotypes of adk1-1. Alternatively, reduced Ado salvage in adk1-1 may inhibit AdoMet regeneration, leading to reduced capping of newly synthesized mRNAs upon gravistimulation (Kimbrough et al., 2004) and inadequate homeostasis (through AdoMet-dependent transmethylation reactions) of plant regulatory molecules, such as auxin, cytokinins, and flavonoids, with demonstrated or potential roles in gravitropism and root tip Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

morphogenesis (Schoor and Moffatt, 2004). The latter model is compatible with our observation of decreased auxin level, as defined by DR5-GUS expression in rootcap columella cells of adk1-1 relative to wild type. Work is under way to test these models. While regulating Ado levels, ADK also converts ATP into AMP (Moffatt et al., 2000), sensitizing its activity to the energy balance of a cell. Hence, its positive contribution to gravitropic sensitivity may allow roots exposed to stressful conditions to deploy growth behaviors that are less dependent upon gravitropism, thus enabling better responses to other, more relevant directional parameters that guide them toward more favorable environments (Massa and Gilroy, 2003).

MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Estland wild-type seed stocks were used for the proteomic screen (Guan et al., 2003). adk1-1 was isolated from a Ler population containing a gene-trap construct (Wilson, 1995) and provided to us by Dr. Sundøs-Larsson (Uppsala University, Sweden). adk2-1 and pin3-4 were obtained from the SALK T-DNA insertion collection from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (SALK_000565 and SALK_038609, respectively; Alonso et al., 2003). pgm-1 (TC7), pin4-4, DR5TGUS-transformed wild-type Columbia seeds, and scr-1 were previously described (Di Laurenzio et al., 1996; Ulmasov et al., 1997; Boonsirichai et al., 2003; Peer et al., 2004). Plant growth conditions were as described (Boonsirichai et al., 2003; Guan et al., 2003).

Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis of Root-Tip Proteins Gravistimulation was performed on vertically grown 4-d-old seedlings by gently rotating the plates 90° in a clockwise direction. Seedlings were allowed to respond to the stimulus for an additional 12 min. Mechano-stimulation was also carried out by gently rotating the plates 90° clockwise for 15 to 30 s, then rotating them back counterclockwise to their original orientation and incubating them for another 12 min. At the end of this period, 3- to 5-mm root tips were dissected and stored in liquid nitrogen. To minimize the biological and technological variance, for each experiment, protein samples were extracted from approximately 600 seedlings from 10 different plates per extraction (50– 60 mg of tissue). This protocol was repeated three times. Root tips were ground in liquid nitrogen and subjected to a three-step extraction protocol (Molloy et al., 1998). Tris-soluble proteins were fractionated by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) as recommended by the supplier (Amersham Pharmacia) and silver stained as described (Blum et al., 1987). Silver-stained gels were scanned and digitized. Digitized 2-DE gel images were analyzed using image-analysis software (PDQuest; Bio-Rad) for spot-intensity comparison between stimulated and unstimulated samples. Protein spots present on a gel were detected using the Spot Detection Wizard in the software. Relative intensity of a protein spot was calculated by a Gaussian arithmetic model and normalized with the total intensity of the gel images from the three experimental repeats. Identical protein spots in both the control and experiment gel images were land-marked manually to generate a match-set image. Proteins included in specific 2-DE spots were identified by nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, as described in the legend to Supplemental Figure S1.

Western-Blot Analysis of ADK Protein Expression in Arabidopsis Root Tips Total proteins were extracted from control and 30-min gravistimulated root tips as described previously (Kagaya et al., 2002), and approximately 30 mg protein from each extract was subjected to western-blot analysis using the procedures outlined by the manufacturer (Qiagen). Anti-ADK (Moffatt et al., 2000) and mouse monoclonal anti-histone H3 (Abcam) antibodies were used

571

Young et al.

as primary antibodies at dilutions of 1:7,500 and 1:1,000, respectively. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgG (Pierce) were used as secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:10,000.

Phenotypic Characterization of Mutant Seedlings Phenotypic analyses were conducted on 4-d-old seedlings, unless otherwise stated. Analyses of etiolated growth and of gravitropism in light or in darkness were as described (Sedbrook et al., 1999; Boonsirichai et al., 2003). Analyses of gravitropic sensitivities were carried out using previously reported procedures (Blancaflor et al., 1998; Perbal et al., 2002). Phytohormone-, NPA-, spermine-, and ACC-response assays and starch staining of the columella cells were performed as described previously (Guan et al., 2003; Clay and Nelson, 2005). Cellular organization of wild-type and mutant root tips was analyzed by fluorescent labeling of the cell walls, using 10 mg mL21 propidium iodide (Sigma) for 1 to 3 min. Histochemical staining for GUS activity was described previously (Boonsirichai et al., 2003). To account for some wild-type root caps showing DR5-GUS expression in their upper lateral cap cells upon gravistimulation, we established EIDR5-GUS, which is defined as 100 times the ratio of the number of root caps showing preferential DR5-GUS expression in the lower lateral cap cells minus the number of caps showing expression in the upper lateral cap cells, to the total number of caps analyzed. Analyses of cytoplasmic pH in control and gravistimulated root-cap statocytes (S3 layer) were performed on at least 10 separate roots, as reported previously (Boonsirichai et al., 2003).

Determination of ADK Activity ADK enzymatic activity was measured in protein extracts from rosette leaves of 3.5- to 4-week-old plants grown in soil, or from 5- to 6 mm-long, dissected root tips of vertically grown or 12-min gravistimulated, 5-d-old, GM-agar-grown seedlings (Boonsirichai et al., 2003), using previously published procedures (Moffatt et al., 2000). For each sample, ADK activity was determined in three reactions involving 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mL of the initial extract. Each determination was performed in triplicate. Each experiment was repeated. The data shown in this article derive from one representative experiment that included two biological replicates of each tested genotype. Activities are represented in units, which correspond to nanomoles of AMP produced per milligram of total protein in the extract per minute of reaction.

A second round of PCR reaction was then performed on those adk1-1 progeny to test whether they contained the trans-complementation construct, using primers AAGCAAGTTCAAACAAAAATAGAGGATA and GAAAAGTGAAGAAGTACCCAGTCAT (located within the ADK1 sequence in the complementation construct). Homozygous adk1-1 lines that produced an approximately 800-bp product contained the trans-complementation construct. Multiple F2 lines that were homozygous adk1-1 and did or did not contain the transcomplementation ADK1 construct were further selfed, and the root gravitropic phenotype of the corresponding F3 seedlings was analyzed (Boonsirichai et al., 2003).

PIN3 Antibody Generation, Immunofluorescence Staining, and Microscopy Rabbit anti-PIN3 polyclonal antibodies were raised against a polypeptide containing amino acids 334 to 483 of the PIN3 protein fused to glutathione S-transferase, expressed in Escherichia coli DH10b from the pGEX4T-3 vector (Laboratory of Animal Resources, University of Wisconsin Medical School). They were diluted 10 times in 1 3 phosphate-buffered saline and purified by overnight incubation with glutathione-sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences) that had been pretreated with soluble protein extracts from E. coli expressing glutathione S-transferase. After centrifugation at 500g, the supernatant was diluted 1:1,000 and used as purified anti-PIN3 polyclonal antibody in immunolocalization experiments. Anti-PIN2 and anti-PIN4 antibodies were described previously (Boonsirichai et al., 2003; Peer et al., 2004). Immunolocalization experiments were performed on 4- to 6-d-old seedlings, as described (Boonsirichai et al., 2003). To keep track of the seedlings’ orientation within the gravity field, gravistimulated roots were cut diagonally along the vertical axis. Images were obtained using a Bio-Rad MRC1024 laser scanning confocal microscope with excitation/emission filters of 560/585 nm (Keck Biological Imaging Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison). To account for several gravistimulated wild-type root caps that displayed asymmetrical accumulation of PIN3 at the upper side of the columella cells, possibly as a consequence of stochastic effects unrelated to gravistimulation, we established RIPIN3, which is defined as 100 times the ratio of the number of root caps showing preferential PIN3 accumulation along the new physical bottom of the columella statocytes, minus the number of root caps showing PIN3 accumulation on the upper side of the statocytes, to the total number of root caps analyzed.

Statistical Analysis Determination of Polyamine Levels in Seedlings To determine the levels of free putrescine, spermidine, and spermine, wildtype Ler and adk1-1 mutant seedlings were germinated and grown for 2 weeks on vertical GM media solidified with 0.7% agar (Sigma, type E). Growth conditions were: 16 h day, 8 h night; light from cool-white fluorescent tubes at 70 mE m22 s21; 22°C; and 80% relative humidity. Seedlings were harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground. Ground tissue was resuspended in 1 mL of cold perchloric acid/500 mg of tissue and kept frozen in liquid nitrogen until analysis. Levels of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine were analyzed by HPLC separation after dansyl-chloride derivatization, as described previously (Marce et al., 1995). The experiment included biological replication, and determination was made on triplicated samples from each extract.

Functional Rescue of adk1-1 by ADK1 Transgene To generate plants expressing ADK1 from its endogenous promoter, a 3.6-kb genomic fragment including 0.8 kb of the 5#-untranslated region and 0.4 kb of the 3#-untranslated region was PCR-amplified from wild-type genomic DNA, subcloned into pENTR vector (Invitrogen), and subsequently transferred into the Gateway binary destination vector pKWG (VIB) via sitespecific LR clonase reaction (Invitrogen). This ADK1-pKWG construct was first introduced into wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (Boonsirichai et al., 2003) because it contains a selectable marker (kanamycin resistance) that is already present in adk1-1. Transformants harboring the ADK1-pKWG T-DNA were isolated and crossed to adk1-1. F1s were selfed, and homozygous adk1-1 F2 progeny were identified by PCR, using primers ACATACATGTGCCGACACAAAAGAT (reverse) and GAAAAGTGAAGAAGTACCCAGTCAT. F2 lines that did not produce PCR products were considered homozygous for adk1-1.

572

Experiments described in this article were repeated once or twice, as outlined in the figures legends. All biometrical data were subjected to statistical analysis of significance, using the F- and t-test functions provided by Microsoft Excel version X.

Supplemental Data The following materials are available in the online version of this article. Supplemental Figure S1. Identification of graviresponsive ADK protein spot by mass spectrometry. Supplemental Figure S2. Root-tip ADK protein abundance increases relative to a histone H3 loading control upon gravistimulation. Supplemental Figure S3. adk1-1 shows wild-type response to exogenously applied IAA and NPA. Supplemental Figure S4. Columella cell morphology defects in adk1-1. Supplemental Figure S5. ACC does not rescue the gravitropic defect of adk1-1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Juan-Cruz Cuevas (Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) and Sarah Schoor (University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) for performing the polyamine-measurement and ADK assays, respectively; Carolyn Neal and Jessica Will for testing the effect of ACC on adk1-1 root gravitropism; and the Mass Spectrometry Services at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Adenosine Kinase Modulates Root Gravitropism

(Grzegorz Sabat and Amy Harms) and at Washington University (Ilan Vidavsky) for mass spectrometric identification of protein spots. We also thank the UW-Madison Biotechnology Sequencing Center for resolving our sequencing reactions and the Keck Biological Imaging Laboratory for the use of their confocal microscopes. Received June 7, 2006; accepted July 26, 2006; published August 4, 2006.

LITERATURE CITED Aloni R, Langhans M, Aloni E, Ullrich C (2004) Role of cytokinin in the regulation of root gravitropism. Planta 220: 177–182 Alonso J, Stepanova A, Leisse T, Kim C, Chen H, Shinn P, Stevenson D, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657 Bennett M, Marchant A, Green H, May S, Ward S, Millner P, Walker A, Schulz B, Feldmann K (1996) Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: a permease-like regulator of root gravitropism. Science 273: 948–950 Blancaflor E, Fasano J, Gilroy S (1998) Mapping the functional roles of cap cells in the response of Arabidopsis primary roots to gravity. Plant Physiol 116: 213–222 Blancaflor E, Masson P (2003) Plant gravitropism. Unraveling the ups and downs of a complex process. Plant Physiol 133: 1677–1690 Blilou I, Xu J, Wildwater M, Willemsen V, Paponov I, Friml J, Heidstra R, Aida M, Palme K, Scheres B (2005) The PIN auxin efflux facilitator network controls growth and patterning in Arabidopsis roots. Nature 433: 39–44 Blum H, Beler H, Gross H (1987) Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8: 93–99 Boonsirichai K, Sedbrook J, Chen R, Gilroy S, Masson P (2003) ARG1 is a peripheral membrane protein that modulates gravity-induced cytoplasmic alkalinization and lateral auxin transport in plant statocytes. Plant Cell 15: 2612–2625 Boutte Y, Crosnier M, Carraro N, Traas J, Satiat-Jeunemaitre B (2006) The plasma membrane recycling pathway and cell polarity in plants: studies on PIN proteins. J Cell Sci 119: 1255–1265 Buck L (2004) Adenosine as a signal for ion channel arrest in anoxiatolerant organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol 139: 401–414 Chen R, Rosen E, Masson P (1999) Update: gravitropism in higher plants. Plant Physiol 120: 343–350 Clay N, Nelson T (2005) Arabidopsis thickvein mutation affects vein thickness and organ vascularization, and resides in a provascular cellspecific spermine synthase involved in vein definition and in polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol 138: 767–777 Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy J, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G, Hahn M, Feldmann K, Benfey P (1996) The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86: 423–433 Fasano J, Swanson S, Blancaflor E, Dowd P, Kao T, Gilroy S (2001) Changes in root cap pH are required for the gravity response of the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 13: 907–921 Friml J, Wisniewska J, Benkova E, Mendgen K, Palme K (2002) Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis. Nature 415: 806–809 Fukaki H, Wysocka-Diller J, Kato T, Fujisawa H, Benfey P, Tasaka M (1998) Genetic evidence that the endodermis is essential for shoot gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 14: 425–430 Guan C, Rosen E, Boonsirichai K, Poff K, Masson P (2003) The ARG1LIKE2 (ARL2) gene of Arabidopsis thaliana functions in a gravity signal transduction pathway that is genetically distinct from the PGM pathway. Plant Physiol 133: 100–112 Kagaya Y, Hobo T, Murata M, Ban A, Hattori T (2002) Abscisic acidinduced transcription is mediated by phosphorylation of an abscisic acid response element binding factor, TRAB1. Plant Cell 14: 3177–3189

Plant Physiol. Vol. 142, 2006

Kimbrough J, Salinas-Mondragon R, Boss W, Brown C, Winter Sederoff H (2004) The fast and transient transcriptional network of gravity and mechanical stimulation in the Arabidopsis root apex. Plant Physiol 136: 2790–2805 Luschnig C, Gaxiola R, Grisafi P, Fink G (1998) EIR1, a root-specific protein involved in auxin transport, is required for gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev 12: 2175–2187 Marce M, Brown D, Capell T, Figueras X, Tiburcio A (1995) Rapid highperformance liquid chromatographic method for quantification of polyamines as their dansyl derivatives: application to plant and animal tissues. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 666: 329–333 Massa G, Gilroy S (2003) Touch modulates gravity sensing to regulate the growth of primary roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 33: 435–445 Mathews I, Erion M, Ealick S (1998) Structure of human adenosine kinase at 1.5 A resolution. Biochemistry 37: 15607–15620 Moffatt B, Wang L, Allen M, Stevens Y, Qin W, Snider J, von Schwartzenberg K (2000) Adenosine kinase of Arabidopsis. Kinetic properties and gene expression. Plant Physiol 124: 1775–1785 Molloy M, Herbert B, Walsh B, Tyler M, Traini M, Sanchez J-C, Hochstrasser D, Williams K, Gooley A (1998) Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using twodimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19: 837–844 Morgan P, Gausman H (1966) Effects of ethylene on auxin transport. Plant Physiol 41: 45–52 Muday G, DeLong A (2001) Polar auxin transport: controlling where and how much. Trends Plant Sci 6: 535–542 Nawy T, Lee J, Colinas J, Wang J, Thongrod S, Malamy J, Birnbaum K, Benfey P (2005) Transcriptional profile of the Arabidopsis root quiescent center. Plant Cell 17: 1908–1925 Ottenschla¨ger I, Wolff P, Wolverton C, Bhalerao R, Sandberg G, Ishikawa H, Evans M, Palme K (2003) Gravity-regulated differential auxin transport from columella to lateral root cap cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2987–2991 Peer W, Bandyopadhyay A, Blakeslee J, Makam S, Chen R, Masson P, Murphy A (2004) Variation in expression and protein localization of the PIN family of auxin efflux facilitator proteins in flavonoid mutants with altered auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16: 1898–1911 Perbal G, Jeune B, Lefranc A, Carnero-Diaz E, Driss-Ecole D (2002) The dose-response curve of the gravitropic reaction: a re-analysis. Physiol Plant 114: 336–342 Sabatini S, Heidstra R, Wildwater M, Scheres B (2003) SCARECROW is involved in positioning the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Genes Dev 17: 354–358 Schoor S, Moffatt B (2004) Applying high throughput techniques in the study of adenosine kinase in plant metabolism and development. Front Biosci 9: 1771–1781 Scott A, Allen N (1999) Changes in cytosolic pH within Arabidopsis root columella cells play a key role in the early signaling pathway for root gravitropism. Plant Physiol 121: 1291–1298 Sedbrook J, Chen R, Masson P (1999) ARG1 (Altered Response to Gravity) encodes a DnaJ-like protein that potentially interacts with the cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1140–1145 Terasaka K, Blakeslee J, Titapiwatanakun B, Peer W, Bandyopadhyay A, Makam S, Lee O, Richards E, Murphy A, Sato F, et al (2005) PGP4, an ATP binding cassette P-glycoprotein, catalyzes auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant Cell 17: 2922–2939 Ulmasov T, Hagen G, Guilfoyle T (1997) ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin response elements. Science 276: 1865–1868 Williams-Ashman HG, Seidenfeld J (1986) Aspects of the biochemical pharmacology of methyl glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone). Biochem Pharmacol 35: 1217–1225 Wilson K (1995) Development of transposon tagging systems for use in Arabidopsis thaliana and the study of a transposon tagged semi-dominant dwarfing mutation. PhD thesis. John Innes Institute/Centre Yester J, Kimbrough J, Salinas-Mondragon R, Masson P, Brown C, Winter Sederoff H (2006) Regulation of transcription in roots of Arabidopsis gravity mutants. Gravit Space Biol Bull (in press)

573