Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference; Build Green and Renovate Deep, 5-7 October 2016, Tallinn and Helsinki
Advanced technologies for appropriate control of heat and light at windows Takashi Inouea,*, Masayuki Ichinoseb a Tokyo university of science, 2641 yamazaki noda-shi chiba 278-8510, Japan Tokyo metropolitan university, 1-1 minamiosawa hachioji-shi tokyo 192-0397, Japan
b
Abstract Windows are thermally weak compared with external walls and roofs, and have a large effect on the indoor thermal and light environments, and the energy used for lighting and for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning. Furthermore, it is important that the window system and blinds could be controlled appropriately according to the wishes of the occupants to ensure satisfactory thermal and light environment, and acceptable views from the windows. This paper reports the basic concepts and the advanced technologies and mechanisms of the windows for controlling heat and light, and their effects based on specific examples. © 2016 by by Elsevier Ltd.Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © 2016The TheAuthors. Authors.Published Published Elsevier (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference.
Keywords: window; solar-shading; daylighting; near-infrared range; retro-reflection; thermotropic glass
1. Introduction Windows are the primary means for using sunlight, but they basically consist of thin panes of glass and have significantly reduced thermal insulation performance and solar-shading performance compared with other parts of the building envelope, such as the walls and the roof. As a result, windows tend to be a major weakness from the perspective of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC). In fact, the period immediately after the first oil crisis (1973) saw the construction of energy-saving office buildings in which the windows were made as small as
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-7-7124-1501 (ex.3504); fax: +81-4-7125-7533. E-mail address:
[email protected] (T. Inoue)
1876-6102 © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the SBE16 Tallinn and Helsinki Conference. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.092
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
Single glazing without lighting control
South-perimeter zone
1500
Double glazing
Single glazing
500
Low-E(Ag2) double glazing 400
Low-E(Ag2) double glazing without lighting control
300
1000
200
500
High-reflective glazing
Single glazing + inner blind Low-E(Ag2) double glazing + inner blind Low-E(Ag2) double glazing + outdoor blind
0 0
20
40
60
80
100
Primary energy consumption [Kwh/䟝/year]
Primary energy consumption [MJ/䟝/year] ୍ḟ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᾘ㈝㔞 [MJ/m2/ᖺ]
34
100
Window ratio㛤ཱྀ⋡ (Window [%] Area/Facade) [%] Fig. 1. Effects of daylighting, blinds control, glazing on energy consumption in office [Appendix A].
possible in order to reduce HVAC load. However, taking into account that lighting consumes the next largest amount of energy after HVAC, energy-saving results may differ if the lighting can be turned off or controlled using the sunlight from the window. From this perspective, calculations were performed, adding a function that evaluates sunlight use with respect to the dynamic heat load simulations (HASP-L). The results indicated that windows should be somewhat larger on the assumption of that sunlight can be used for energy savings [1-3]. Essentially the same conclusions were obtained when attempting such simulations with the recently developed Building Energy Simulation Tool (BEST) program as shown in Fig. 1 [Appendix A]. 2. Basic idea of controlling solar radiation through windows If we consider the intensity of solar radiation, particularly direct solar radiation, which has a maximum strength of approximately 1 kW/m2, it is necessary to block solar radiation appropriately from the perspective of the thermal and light environment and the air-conditioning (cooling) load in offices and other buildings. Currently, the following procedure is thought to be effective: first, using high thermal performance window systems such as airflow windows, external shading, or a double skin; second, maintaining the outside view and scenery; third, using sunlight incident between the blind slats; and fourth, implementing lighting control, such as turning off or dimming the light. With respect to the key point of demand to allow light inside while keeping out heat, the basic idea is to transmit as much visible light as possible while reflecting the near-infrared component to the outside. Although shading-type Low-E double glazing is very effective for this purpose, when variations in the strength of the direct component of the sunlight are considered, achieving this with glass alone is extremely difficult. It is essential to use this type of glass in combination with appropriately controlled blinds, specifically, blinds that block light at a slat angle and are sufficient for blocking the direct solar radiation component above a threshold value (Fig. 2) [3][4]. Furthermore, the near-infrared component of the solar radiation reflected outside by the window surface deteriorates the thermal environment of the city space, including in the surrounding neighborhood and street areas. To resolve this problem, a retro-reflective film that reflects only the near-infrared component upward has been proposed, and progress is being made applying it to buildings and verifying the effects.
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
Daylight
Protective angle
View
Fig. 2. Protective slat-angle control of automatic blinds
3. Advanced technologies and their effects 3.1. Application to office buildings High-performance window systems are effective when combined with automatic blinds that control vertical movement of slats and change slat angles based on the solar radiation conditions [2-4]; with glass or film that has suitable wavelength-selective and transmitted reflection-directive properties [5, 6]; and with lighting control that uses high-efficiency light sources. In some high-rise office building projects we have been involved with, we were able to achieve energy savings of 30–50% by adopting these measures (Figs. 3–5) [7].
Exhaust air duct Horizontal canopy
Solar-shading type Low-E double glazing :8+A12+8mm
Vertical louver
Automatic venetian blinds (bright color) Laminar glass :5+5mm
Peri-counter
Air intake
(b) Cross-section of window
2000
1500
䛭䛾 Other
↷᫂䞉 Lighting 䝁䞁䝉䞁䝖 䞉Outlet
17%
40%
1000 Airconditioning ✵ㄪᦙ㏦ transport
䛭䛾 Other 䝔䝘䞁䝖ືຊ Tenant Power
11% 8%
䝁䞁䝉䞁䝖
Outlet
15%
↷᫂ Lighting
35%
17%
500 Heat source ⇕※ Cold source
1263
-䠐 䠐-42% 䠎䠂
1823
2173
-16%
Primary energy consumption [MJ/m2]
(a) Façade 2500
Air conditioning transport10% ✵ㄪᦙ㏦
26%
⇕※ Heat ෭⇕※ source Cold source
0
Average Large Building in Tokyo
Entire city block
8% 13%
Marunouchi-Park Building Office
(c) Measured annual energy consumption Fig. 3. Office building with shading type Low-E double glazing, airflow windows and automatic blinds
35
36
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
RG: 1
H : 0 . 9 5 SC: NORM EL : WA
03/10 /17 13:45 :00 (100 .0) 39. 0 37. 5 36. 0 34. 5 33. 0
29.4Υ Υ
39.5Υ Υ 34.4Υ Υ
Conventional Exterior blinds Conventional blinds (mediumcolored) blinds (light colored) (medium colored)
31. 5 30. 0 28. 5 27. 0 (-20.0)
X:188 Y:131 T: 39.4
(a) Façade
(b) Comparison of interior surface temperature of different type of building
Fig. 4. Office building with exterior blinds
$LUGXFW
[Clear weather] /LJKWLQJ +LJKWUDQVPLVVLRQ GRXEOHJOD]LQJ $PP $XWRPDWLFFRQWURO EOLQGV
[Cloudy or rainy weather]
Minimum angle for protection
*OD]LQJPP
(a) Façade
(b) Cross-section of window
0.8
+ RUL]RQWDODQJOH
20000
8 SZDUGUDWLR
' RZQZDUGUDWLR
16000
' LUHFWLOOXP LQDQFH
0.6
12000
0.4 0.2
8000 : HVWYHUWLFDOLOOXP LQDQFH
4000
0 8000 6000
0 400 7 UDQVP LWWHGLOOXP LQDQFH 8 SZDUG
300
' RZQZDUG
4000
200
2000
100
0 10㸸00
(c) Measurement of daylight at window
3 URWHFWLYHVODW DQJOH
12㸸00
14㸸00
16㸸00
0 18㸸00
(d) Blind control and measured upward/downward daylight
Fig. 5. Office building with airflow windows, double-skin and automatic blinds
,OOXP LQDQFH>O[@
┤ᚄ Diameter 㻞 㻡 㻜 㼇㼙 㼙 㼉 250[mm]
1.0
8 SZDUG' RZQZDUG LOOXP LQDQFH>O[@
↷ᗘィ Illuminometer
7 UDQVP LWWHG 8 SZDUG' RZQZDUG OXP LQRXVIOX[>㹪 㹫㎡ @ UDWLR>@
Opening diameter ሬᩱ䠖 Barium sulfate ◲㓟䝞䝸 䜴䝮 㛤ཱྀ㒊┤ᚄ 㻣 㻜 㼇㼙 㼙 㼉 70[mm]
Diffuse Light ᣑᩓග
Slat angle : horizontal
Control slat angle to shade direct sunlight
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
Along with developing high-performance building envelopes that use multiple layers with linked sensor, communication, control, and drive technologies, we are also exploring passive techniques such as building skin facades of materials that selectively transmit, reflect, and absorb in the same manner as biological skin. This allows achieving internal comfort and energy-saving requirements by varying performance of envelopes autonomously in response to indoor and outdoor conditions. In particular, we have experimented, in an actual research institute building (Fig.6), with solar shading and naturallight use through a responsive thermotropic glass that incorporates a polymer hydrogel. This window becomes translucent when the temperature rises above its phase-transition temperature due to factors such as solar radiation, and changes back to transparent when the temperature drops below the phase-transition temperature again [8]. In addition to saving energy, we also received fairly positive feedback from people working in the building. Technologies, such as multi-layered shading-type Low-E double glazing, which transmits light and reflects the near-infrared range of solar radiation, and film with similar wavelength characteristics, are now in general use, and we are conducting research on films with retro-reflective properties in only the near-infrared wavelength range. The films have been installed in high-rise buildings in Tokyo (Fig. 7). In conventional high-reflectivity techniques, specular near-infrared component reflections from the window surface fall directly on neighboring streets, which increases the equivalent temperature substantially. We expect that reflecting this radiation upward will improve the street-level thermal environment and mitigate the heat island phenomenon [10].
AHU for west block
A
Thermotropic glass AHU for east block
(a) Façade
(b) Floor plan
ext.
int. Gel Air gap
A Thermotropic Thermotropic glass glass : Low-e coating A : Air gapLow-E
Float glass
(c) Thermotropic glass window
Fig. 6. National institute building with thermotropic glass
37
38
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
Double sliding ty
Outer glass:FL12mm Near-infrared retroreflective film
Light colored blinds
Guide rail(ceiling surface) Both sides of blinds are white (laboratory rooms, Manually etc.) opened/closed natural air circulation port Both sides of blinds are black (for use as blackout curtain in classrooms)
Control panel for blinds
Air inlet
(a) Façade
(b) Detail of window with retro-reflective film
UV+V with Retro-reflective film
NIR Retroreflective
Conventional
Retro-reflective
(c) Result of comparison experiment (d) Effects of retro-reflective windows on thermal environment in street Fig. 7. Building with retro-reflective film
3.2. Daylight film Daylight film has also been developed that works in conjunction with blind control and effectively admits sunlight to the interior of the room when attached to the upper part of the window surface. The contribution of this film to energy savings through using solar radiation and controlling lighting has been confirmed in experiments and in offices [11].
Daylight film
Fig.8. Room with daylight film and automatic blinds
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
3.3. Near-infrared reflective blinds for direct gain passive solar house Direct solar gain systems that obtain solar heat directly from the windows are often installed in passive solar houses. For the system to work well, the amount of solar heat gain and effectiveness of the thermal mass must match. We proposed a combination of blinds that reflect only near-infrared solar radiation upward to the ceiling and the PCM (Phase Change Material) in the ceiling. The system distributed and absorbed solar heat adequately. We evaluated the direct gain system experimentally and with a simulation. The system could improve indoor thermal environment and contribute to energy saving [12]. High thermal insulation
overheat in the daytime nighttime chill
carpet and furniture disturb thermal storage Thermal storage material
(a) Conventional direct gain system 㻼㻯㻹㻌㻔 㻼㼔 㼍 㼟㼑㻌㻯㼔 㼍 㼚 㼓 㼑㻌㻹㼍 㼠㼑㼞㼕㼍 㼘㻕
㻺 㼑㼍 㼞㻙㼕㼚 㼒㼞㼍 㼞㼑㼐 㻌㼞㼍 㼚 㼓 㼑 㻿㼛㼘㼍 㼞 㼞㼍 㼐 㼕㼍 㼠㼕㼛㼚
㼛㼡 㼠㼐 㼛㼛㼞
㼕㼚 㼐 㼛㼛㼞
㼑㼒㼒㼕㼏㼕㼑㼚 㼠㻌 㼠㼔 㼑㼞㼙 㼍㼘㻌㼟㼠㼛㼞㼍㼓 㼑 㼞㼑㼟㼠㼞㼍㼕㼚 㻌 㼛㼢㼑㼞㼔 㼑㼍㼠㻌㼍㼚 㼐 㼏㼔 㼕㼘㼘
㼂㼕㼟㼕㼎 㼘㼑㻌㼞㼍 㼚 㼓 㼑
Near-infrared Reflective film r 㼀㼔 㼑㼞㼙 㼍 㼘㻌㼟㼠㼛㼞㼍 㼓 㼑㻌㼙 㼍 㼠㼑㼞㼕㼍 㼘
(b) Near-infrared reflective blinds
㻺 㼑㼍 㼞㻙㼕㼚 㼒㼞㼍 㼞㼑㼐㻌㼞㼑㼒㼘㼑㼏㼠㼕㼢㼑㻌㼎㼘㼕㼚 㼐㼟
(c) Proposed direct gain system
Fig. 9. Improvement of thermal storage by near-infrared reflective blinds
Near-infrared image
Visible image
(a) Without blinds Jan. / 2016
Near-infrared image
Visible image
(b) Near-infrared reflective blinds Jan. / 2016
Fig. 10. Effect of near-infrared reflective blinds on ceiling
39
40
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
4. Conclusions Control of both the heat and light of solar radiation incident on the glass surface is extremely important in terms energy savings and the indoor thermal and light environment, but it is possible to greatly increase energy savings and improve the office work environment by appropriate design and control of the characteristics of the windows. During the process of adopting the use of sunlight, however, the illuminance of desktop surfaces—an indicator of the visual and light environment in modern offices—is insufficient. We believe that it is necessary to give full consideration to goals such as ensuring a natural view, providing a feeling of openness, preventing glare, imparting a feeling of brightness, and reflecting natural changes of season, time, and weather in the room. Furthermore, if we can increase efficiency to the next level by using high-efficiency lighting such as LEDs, the effect of reducing the lighting power consumption by appropriately adjusting the lighting and the effect of reducing the cooling load by reducing the heat generated by the lighting, would become smaller. Thus, we can change to an emphasis on people with respect to the use of solar radiation. Furthermore, daylighting films that obtain a large sunlight utilization effect when affixed to windows and retroreflective films that reduce both the cooling load and the adverse effects on the surrounding neighborhood by maintaining transparency in the visible light region while reflecting the near-infrared component of the solar radiation upwards are among the technologies that have reached the stage of practical application. With the development and spread of new technologies, we can expect to take a step toward reducing the environmental load and improving comfort.
References [1] Takashi INOUE, et.al, Lighting Control and Energy Conservation in Office Building, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan; 2007 March [2] Takashi INOUE, Masayuki ICHINOSE, Effects of automatically controlled blinds on visual environment and energy consumption in office buildings, Proceedings of CISBAT 2009 [3] Planning manual of automatic blind system for environment-conscious buildings, SHASE-M1008-2009 [4] Ryo AKAIKE, Takashi INOUE, Masayuki ICHINOSE, et.al., Combination control of blinds and lighting to reflect changes in natural light environment, J.Illum.Engng. Inst,Jpn.Vol.98 No5(2014) 218-223 [5] Sho FUJITA, Takashi INOUE, Masayuki ICHINOSE, Tsutomu NAGAHAMA, Improvement of outdoor radiative environment by highreflective façade –Effect of heat-shielding film with retro-reflective property in near infrared band-, J.Environ.ENg.,AIJ,Vol.79 No696,(2014),167-172 [6] Takashi INOUE, Masayuki ICHINOSE, Tsutomu NAGAHAMA, Retro-reflecting film with wavelength-selective properties against nearinfrared solar radiation and improving effects of indoor/outdoor thermal environment, Proceedings of CISBAT 2013 [7] Marunouchi Park Building –Example of a low-carbon building located Tokyo-, Tokyo Initiative & Low Emission Building TOP 30,(2011),p20 [8] Takashi INOUE, Solar shading and daylighting by means of autonomous responsive dimming glass -practical application-, Energy and Building, 35, (2003) , 463-471 [9] Paul Baker, Dirk Saelens, Matt Grace, Takashi Inoue, Advanced Envelopes, IEA Annex32, Vol.3, (2000), ISBN 90 75 741 07 3 [10] Takashi INOUE, Masayuki ICHINOSE, Tsutomu NAGAHAMA, Improvement of outdoor thermal radiation environment in urban areas using wavelength-selective retro-reflective film, proceeding PLEA 2015, (2015), 48 [11] Takuma Ban, Takashi Inoue, Nozomu Yoshizawa, et.al., Evaluation of lighting energy consumption and lighting environment by using daylight in Japanese office building, Proceedings of 28th CIE Session 2015, (2015), 1927-1936 [12] Yoshiki Shimada, Maya Ishiwata, Takashi Inoue, et.al., Study on Direct Solar Gain System Controlling Near-Infrared Range, AIJ Journal of Environmental Engineering,AIJ,vol22 No51,(2016),603-607
Takashi Inoue and Masayuki Ichinose / Energy Procedia 96 (2016) 33 – 41
Appendix A Table A-1. Simulation model Item Location Outer wall Inner wall Ceiling Lighting
Configuration Tokyo (36rN,140rE) South Perimeter U-value 1.16[W/੍/K] 1.97[W/੍/K] 1.57[W/੍/K] High frequency Fluorescent lamp 12.5[W/੍] 100[lm/W] 750[lx]
Occupant
0.1[Person/੍]
Office equipment Schedule
10[W/੍]
Preset air-temp.
Summer:26.0[Υ] Intermidiate:24.0[Υ] Winter:22.0[Υ] 40-60[%]
Preset humidity
Table A-2. Glass spec
Glass Type Clear High performance heat-reflective Low-E (One Ag2 layer) Low-E (Two Ag2 layer) Clear + inner blind Low-E (One Ag2 layer) + inner blind Low-E (Two Ag2 layer) + inner blind Without control
Perimeter zone:5,000
Fig. A-1 Simulation model
Pane 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2
τV 0.88 0.79 0.08 0.07 0.75 0.67 0.88 0.75
ρV 0.08 0.15 0.41 0.42 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.12
τ 0.77 0.66 0.06 0.05 0.50 0.33 0.77 0.50
ρ 0.07 0.12 0.34 0.36 0.20 0.32 0.07 0.20
U-value 4.6 2.6 3.8 2.1 1.7 1.5 4.6 1.7
SHGC 0.83 0.74 0.22 0.14 0.57 0.39 0.44 0.36
2
0.67
0.12
0.33
0.32
1.5
0.32
41