Advances in Brachytherapy Delivery and Treatment ...

35 downloads 94 Views 10MB Size Report
Prostate HDR Dose Escalavon. “HDR brachytherapy can provide beøer sparing of rectum and bladder while delivering a higher dose to the prostate. Even with ...
4th  Annual  Conference  of  Indian  Brachytherapy  Society  at   All  India  InsFtute  of  Medical  Sciences     (AIIMS-­‐IBS  conference  2014)  

Advances  in  Brachytherapy   Delivery  and  Treatment  Planning   By   Vibha  Chaswal,  Ph.D.   (Independent  Researcher  and  Collaborator,  USA)   (Invited  faculty  at  AIIMS-­‐IBS  Conference)  

Brachytherapy  Today!   •  High  precision  targeted  Radiotherapy   Modality  with  significant  pa=ent  benefit           •  High  Precision  image  guided  adap=ve   brachytherapy  (IGABT)  

Prostate  Carcinoma   (Over  past  almost  15  years…)  

alpha/beta  for  prostate  tumors   •  Alpa/beta  =  1.5  –  3  Gy   •  possibly  lower  than  the  expected  values  of  about  3  Gy   for  late  complicaFons   •  Not  a  rapidly  re-­‐populaFng  carcinoma     •  reversal  of  the  relaFve  sensiFviFes  to  dose-­‐fracFon   size,  of  tumours  versus  late-­‐responding  normal  Fssues   at-­‐risk  in  convenFonal  radiotherapy   •  a  few  large  fracFons  –  hypo-­‐frac=ona=on  –  might  be   advantageous  for  killing  prostate  carcinoma   Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. “Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma.” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Vol 43(5) 1999 Fowler J1, Chappell R, Ritter M., “Is alpha/beta for prostate tumors really low? “, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Vol 50(4) 2001

Latest  (FINAL?)  word  on  alpha/beta:   Fowler  et.  al.  2013   •  Three  large  staFsFcal  overviews  are  criFqued,   with  results  for  5,000,  6,000  and  14,000  paFents   with  prostate  carcinoma   •  PuZng  15  years  of  controversy  to  rest,  Open   doors  to  opportunity   •  Agree  in  finding  the  average  α/β  ra=o  to  be  less   than  2  Gy   •  hypo-­‐fracFonaFon  =  therapeuFc  gain     Fowler JF et. al., “Is the α/β ratio for prostate tumours really low and does it vary with the level of risk at diagnosis?” Anticancer Res. Vol 33(3) 2013

HDR-­‐BT  of  the  prostate     HypofracFonaFon   and   Dose  escalaFon  

Prostate  HDR    Dose  EscalaFon        “HDR  brachytherapy  can  provide  be_er   sparing  of  rectum  and  bladder  while  delivering   a  higher  dose  to  the  prostate.  Even  with  the   increased  late  effects  of  high  dose  per   fracFon,  there  is  sFll  a  poten=al  for  dose   escala=on  beyond  external  radiotherapy   limits  using  HDR  brachytherapy.”   I C Hsu et. al., “Normal tissue dosimetric comparison between HDR prostate implant boost and conformal external beam radiotherapy boost: potential for dose escalation” Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Vol 46(4) 2000

Prostate  -­‐  HDR   •  TRUS:  real-­‐Fme  imaging,  good  image   quality  of  the  prostate  boundary,   clear  visualisaFon  of  the  needles.     •  But  poor  soc-­‐Fssue  resoluFon;     •  A  marker  wire  or  aerated  gel  is   inserted  into  the  urinary  catheter  to   visualise  the  bladder  and  urethra   •  The  anterior  of  the  rectum  is   visualised  in  contact  with  the   ultrasound  probe  and  image  quality  is   improved  with  the  aid  of  a  saline-­‐ filled  endorectal  balloon  on  the   ultrasound  probe  

A  Challapalli,  E  Jones,  C  Harvey  et.  al.,  “  High  dose  rate  prostate  brachytherapy:  and  overview  of  the  raFonale,   experience,  and  emerging  applicaFons  in  the  treatment  of  prostate  cancer,”  BJR,  85(2012)  

Treatment  Plan  Scan:  CT/MR   •  PaFent  in  Tx  posiFon,  Foley  Catheter  in  place   •  ConFguous  slices  with  scan  thickness  ≤  0.3  cm   •  MUST  include  enFre  prostate  +  at  least  3  slices  (9   mm)  above  and  below  the  prostate     •  include  the  perineum  for  visualizaFon  of  the   catheters  from  Fps  to  outside  the  paFent   •  MUST  include  Fps  of  ALL  the  catheters   •  PaFent’s  external  Body  contours  should  not  be   included  in  FoV  to  maximize  image  quality   AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY PROSTATE HIGH-DOSE RATE TASK GROUP I-Chow Hsu, MD, Yoshiya Yamada MD, Er ic Vigneault MD, Jean Pouliot, PhD August, 2008

Treatment  Planning  EssenFals   •  •  •  •  •  •  •  • 

Volumes  ICRU  Report  58   Turn  off  dwell  locaFons  outside  PTV   Geometric/inverse/Manual  opFmizaFon   V100  prostate  >90%   V75  rectum/Bladder  <  1cc   V125  urethra  <  1cc   EvaluaFon  Isodoses  –  50%,  100%,  150%   DVH  –  sample  minimum  of  5000  points/  ROI  for   cumulaFve  DVH   AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY PROSTATE HIGH-DOSE RATE TASK GROUP I-Chow Hsu, MD, Yoshiya Yamada MD, Er ic Vigneault MD, Jean Pouliot, PhD August, 2008

Treatment  Delivery  and  Image   guidance     •  First  HDR  fracFon  delivered  on  the  day  of  the  catheter   placement.   •  mulFple  fracFons:  consecuFve  fracFons  within  24   hours  acer  the  first  treatment,  but  no  less  than  6  hours   between  treatments   •  Visual  inspec=on  of  the  catheters  prior  to  delivery  of   each  treatment  is  a  MUST   •  Fluoroscopy  or  CT   •  Readjust  catheters  if  required   •  If  reposi=oning  or  readjustment  of  TX  plan  cannot   address  the  catheter  displacement,  postpone   treatment  un=l  a  sa=sfactory  implant  may  be  done   AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY SOCIETY PROSTATE HIGH-DOSE RATE TASK GROUP I-Chow Hsu, MD, Yoshiya Yamada MD, Er ic Vigneault MD, Jean Pouliot, PhD August, 2008

A  Challapalli,  E  Jones,  C  Harvey  et.  al.,  BJR,  85(2012)  

HDR-­‐BT  pre-­‐planning  

Picture courtesy: Janusz Skowronek, MD, PhD, Greater Poland Cancer Center

HDR-­‐BT  real-­‐Fme  planning  

Picture courtesy: Janusz Skowronek, MD, PhD, Greater Poland Cancer Center

Excitement  conFnues…   •  New  Hypofrac=ona=on  schemes  –  UW-­‐ Madison  and  many  others!   •  BrachyView,  a  novel  inbody  imaging  system   for  HDR  prostate  brachytherapy:  design  and   Monte  Carlo  feasibility  study.   •  Real-­‐=me  monitoring  and  verifica=on  of  in   vivo  high  dose  rate  brachytherapy  using  a   pinhole  camera.  

Can’t  forget  sFll  the  gold  standard   most  common  Prostate  BT   procedure……  

Prostate  LDR  –  new  radioisotopes  

•  Rx:  85  Gy  (Cs-­‐131),  110  Gy  (I-­‐125),    100  Gy  (Pd-­‐103)     •  Seed  strengths  employed:  1.6  U  (Cs-­‐131)  and  1.8  U   (Pd-­‐103)  0.54  U  (I-­‐125)   •  45  treatment  plan  comparisons.  For  similar  dose   coverage  (V100  and  D90),  V200  and  V150  reduced.     •  More  “homogeneous”  implants  using  Cs-­‐131  

Slide courtesy: R Miller, B R Thomadsen, “Brachytherapy Physics: Everything you need to know and controversial Issues”, AAPM 2009

Slide courtesy: R Miller, B R Thomadsen, “Brachytherapy Physics: Everything you need to know and controversial Issues”, AAPM 2009

Prostate  LDR-­‐BT  future!   -­‐  InteresFng  simulaFons:   “Direc=onal  I-­‐125  seed  and  ROI  -­‐  Sensi=vity   profiles  based  op=miza=on”  –  UW-­‐Madison   MrBoT:  “Automa=c  Brachytherapy  Seed   Placement  Under  MRI  Guidance”  –  John   Hopkins  University     Auto-­‐segmenta=on  of  prostate  (do  pubmed   search)  

Needle  placement  clinical  consideraFons  –   Prostate  LDR/HDR  BT  

Breast  Cancer  

Breast  Brachytherapy  evoluFon  in   last  decade   Historically, Breast Brachytherapy: treated as "boost” to lumpectomy cavity following external whole breast radiation therapy Now, as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): sole radiation treatment modality following breastconserving surgery

Cox, J. A. & Swanson, T. A. (2013) Current modalities of accelerated partial breast irradiation Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.65

APBI:  MulFcatheter  HDR  

The Godmother HDR-breast Brachytherapy technique 3D CT-guidance or TRUS based volumetric implant Cox, J. A. & Swanson, T. A. (2013) Current modalities of accelerated partial breast irradiation Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.65

APBI:  Mammosite  

       

FDA clearance: 2002 most widely used modern APBI device and with the longest track record, becoming new gold-standard of dosimetry comparison Availability as Single/Multiple central lumen device Ir-192 HDR (image  courtesy  of  MammoSite,  Hologic  Inc.,  Bedford,  MA,  USA)  

APBI:  Mammosite   Pre- and post-manipulation images of patient:   Air-cavity reduction by   a net addition of 10 cm3 to the balloon volume   And/or massage of the implant area  

Manipulating the cavity and adjusting the balloon volume may salvage an implant and assist in meeting the strict geometric and dosimetric criteria imposed by the RTOG 0413 protocol.

J.B.  Wojcicka  et.  al.,  “Clinical  and  dosimetric  experience  with  mammosite-­‐based  brachytherapy  under   the  RTOG  0413  protocol,  JACMP,  Vol.  8(4),    2007    

Mammosite:   Single  Lumen  Vs  MulFple  lumen  Mammosite  implant    

Contura  MulF-­‐Lumen  Balloon   catheter   •  surgeons  and  radiaFon   oncologists  are  familiar   and  comfortable  with   Balloon  type  devices  now   •  Drainage  channels:  air  and   blood  around  the  cavity   could  be  removed  before   treatment,  potenFally   reducing  air  pockets  and   seroma  formaFon   (image courtesy) Bard Medical Systems

SAVI:  Strut  Adjusted  Volume   Implant  (not  balloon)     Single-entry multi-channel catheter system

CT image of a SAVI applicator inside of a lumpectomy cavity.

 

Dose modulation up to 11 channels

 

Improved skin dose sparing as compared with Mammosite and Contoura*

*S Gurdalli, “Dosimetric comparison of three brachytherapy applicators for partial breast irradiation”, World congress of brachytherapy 2008

APBI:  Clearpath     single  entry  MulFcatheter   device  (Hybrid)     Both  HDR  as  well  as  LDR   compa=ble     faciliFes  without  high-­‐rate-­‐rate   equipment  can  now  offer  APBI     Strands  of  I-­‐125  seeds  are   inserted  in  the  outer  catheters     Pa=ents  must  wear  a  fully   shielded  bra  if  low-­‐dose   con=nuous  release  treatment   is  given  

Electronic  brachytherapy   •  FDA  clearance:  2006   •  Balloon  brachytherapy   with  electronic  50  kilo-­‐ voltage  x-­‐ray  source   •  No  radio-­‐isotopes   •  miniature  x-­‐ray  tube   that  is  inserted  into  the   balloon  catheter  and   delivers  the  radiaFon   therapy  

Electronic  brachytherapy  

•  Minimal  Shielding   •  No  rigorous  radiaFon  source  regulaFons   •  IORT  with  EBX  -­‐  TARGIT  trial  

References   •  C  F  Njeh  et.  al.  “Accelerated  Par=al  Breast  Irradia=on  (APBI):  A   review  of  available  techniques”  Radia2on  Oncology,  5:90,  2010   •  Brent  Herron  et.  al.  “A  Review  of  Radia=on  Therapy’s  Role  in  Early-­‐ Stage  Breast  Cancer  and  an  Introduc=on  to  Electronic   Brachytherapy”   •  *S  Gurdalli,  “Dosimetric  comparison  of  three  brachytherapy   applicators  for  parFal  breast  irradiaFon”,  World  congress  of   brachytherapy  2008   •  J.B.  Wojcicka  et.  al.,  “Clinical  and  dosimetric  experience  with   mammosite-­‐based  brachytherapy  under  the  RTOG  0413  protocol,   JACMP,  Vol.  8(4),    2007     •  Cox,  J.  A.  &  Swanson,  T.  A.  (2013)  Current  modaliFes  of  accelerated   parFal  breast  irradiaFon  Nat.  Rev.  Clin.  Oncol.  doi:10.1038/ nrclinonc.2013.65  

Cervical  Cancer   (Aha!)  

Cervical  cancer        Brachytherapy  plays  fundamental  role  in  the   therapeuFc  approach  of  paFents  with  FIGO   stage  I-­‐IV  cervical  carcinoma          High  precision  image  guided  (Dose  Adap=ve)   Brachytherapy    

Brachytherapy  of  the  cervix   •  AP-­‐PA  radiographs  to  volumetric  imaging   guided  –  CT,  CBCT,  TRUS,  MRI   •  On  road  from  Point-­‐dose  prescripFon  to   Volume-­‐based  prescripFon…..   •  IGABT:  Image  Guided  AdapFve  Brachytherapy   •  HDR:  Intracavitary  (most  common),  IntersFFal-­‐ intracavitary  or  intersFFal  only  

Image  Guidance   •  Image  guidance  for  applicator  placement  – Fluoroscopy,  TRUS,  radiographs…   •  Volumetric  image  set  for  treatment  planning            CT,  MRI,  CBCT   •  Fluro  radiographs  before/acer  CT/MRI  for   applicator  posi=onal  assessment   •  Volumetric  CT  image  set  for  post-­‐implant   assessment  

Intracavitary  BT  for  Cervical  cancer   •  TradiFonally,  Rx  and  Tx  planning:          Either  reference  points  (points  A  and  B)  or   reference  isodoses  (60Gy  according  to  ICRU   recommendaFons)  to  report  doses  to  the   target  volume.     •  Doses  to  criFcal  organs  were  reported  at   bladder  and  rectum  ICRU  points.     •  long-­‐standing  clinical  experience  has  yielded   an  acceptable  therapeu=c  ra=o  

Good  to  be_er…...  

CT-­‐based  BT:  ICRU  Point  Doses  vs   Volumetric  Doses   •  20  paFents   •  The  median  EBRT  dose  45Gy.     •  CT-­‐MRI  compaFble  T&O  BT,  median  dose  24  Gy,  Treatment  planning  using  3D  CT  image  set   •  bladder,  rectum  and  sigmoid  were   retrospecFvely  contoured   •  OAR  doses  assessed  by  DVH  criteria  were   higher  than  ICRU  point  doses   S K Vinod et. al., “A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer” J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. Vol 55(3) 2011

CBCT  guided  promise!     •  3D  planning  in  the  brachytherapy  suite  using  a   cone  beam  CT  (CBCT)  scanner  dedicated  to   brachytherapy   •  No  pa=ent  movement  between  imaging  and   treatment  procedures   •  adequate  image  quality  to  reconstruct  the   applicators  in  the  treatment  planning  system   •  More  prac=cal  and  feasible   Reniers B, Verhaegen F., “Technical note: cone beam CT imaging for 3D image guided brachytherapy for gynecological HDR brachytherapy.” Med Phys. 38(5)2011

Slide  courtesy:  J  Siewerdsen  and  G-­‐H  Chen,  Johns  Hopkins  University  and  UW-­‐Madison  

Most  Promising  IGBT….          MRI  guided  Intracavitary  BT  with  its  excellent   soc  Fssue  contrast!        FuturisFc  for  many…..but  on  road  to  future!  

MRI-­‐BT    

Red: >10% dose deviation for at least 10% of the patients Green:  longer  guide  wire  travel  =>  Cranial   (T)  and  Posterior  (o)   •  ±  1.5,  ±3,  ±5,  ±6,  ±7.5,  ±10,  ±  20  mm   increments  acer  dose  calculaFon   •  Compare  a  shiced  plan  with  an  unshiced  one   •  Assessment  of  impact  on  both  Point  A  plans   and  MRIG-­‐CBT  plans  

SimulaFng  Recon  uncertainty   •  applicator  shics  along  central  axis  only   •  +  shic  =>  longer  guide  wire  travel  =>  Cranial   (T)  and  Posterior  (o)   •  ±  1.5,  ±3,  ±5,  ±6,  ±7.5,  ±10,  ±  20  mm   increments  acer  dose  calculaFon  

Methods   •  Compare  a  shiced  plan  with  an  unshiced  one   •  Assessment  of  impact  on  both  Point  A  plans  and   MRIG-­‐CBT  plans   •  Point  A  plan  based  on  reference  opFmizaFon   lines  and  manual  opFmizaFon     •  MRIG-­‐CBT  plans  using  hybrid-­‐inverse  opFmizaFon   •  Dosimetric  parameters:  HR-­‐CTV  (D100,  D90),   Rectum  D2cc,  Bladder  D2cc,  Sigmoid  D2cc,  ICRU   rectum  and  bladder  points  

Dosimetric  impact  of  Applicator   displacement       •  The  dosimetric  impact  of  simulated  applicator   displacements  (   7.5mm)   •  ICRU  bladder  point  more  sensiFve  than  Bladder   D2cc   •  RoT:            For  dosimetric  change  <  10%    …          limit  Reconstruc=on  uncertainty