Advances in Dental Research

6 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
with caries research on mineralization and fluoride reactivity. The present survey documents ..... simulation of biological aspects of caries, difficulty in matching ...
Advanceshttp://adr.sagepub.com/ in Dental Research

The Application of in Vitro Models to Research on Demineralization and Remineralization of the Teeth D.J. White ADR 1995 9: 175 DOI: 10.1177/08959374950090030101 The online version of this article can be found at: http://adr.sagepub.com/content/9/3/175

Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of: International and American Associations for Dental Research

Additional services and information for Advances in Dental Research can be found at: Email Alerts: http://adr.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://adr.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

THE APPLICATION OF IN VITRO MODELS TO RESEARCH ON DEMORALIZATION AND REMINERALIZATION OF THE TEETH D.J. WHITE

The Procter & Gamble Company HCRC P.O. Box 8006 Mason, Ohio 45040-8006 Adv Dent Res 9(3): 175-193, November, 1995

Abstract—Progress in in vivo and in situ experimentation has led many researchers to speculate as to the relevance and importance of in vitro testing protocols in caries research. A Medline/Biosis search for the present review revealed well over 300 citations (since 1989) documenting in vitro tests associated with caries research on mineralization and fluoride reactivity. The present survey documents these recent applications of in vitro test methods in both mechanistic and 'profile'* caries research. In mechanistic studies, in vitro protocols over the past five years have made possible detailed studies of dynamics occurring in mineral loss and gain from dental tissues and the reaction dynamics associated with fluoride anticaries activity. Similarly, in profile applications, in vitro protocols make possible the inexpensive and rapid—yet sensitive—assessment of F anticaries efficacy within fluoride-active systems, and these tests represent a key component of product activity confirmation. The ability to carry out single variable experiments under highly controlled conditions remains a key advantage in in vitro experimentation, and will likely drive even further utilization, as advances continue in physical-chemical and analytical techniques for substrate analysis in these protocols. Despite their advantages, in vitro testing protocols have significant limitations, most particularly related to their inability to simulate the complex biological processes involved in caries. Key words: In vitro, caries, demoralization, remineralization. Presented at the Conference on Clinical Aspects of De/Remineralization of Teeth, June 11-14, 1994, Woodclijf Conference Center, Rochester, NY * "Profile ", for the purposes of this paper, refers to test protocols used by industrial firms in the screening of topical agents for efficacy in standardized tests aimed to meet American Dental Association or Food and Drug Administration requirements. ADA standardized tests include use of appropriate control agents/products as detailed in the proceedings of the 1990 Model Systems Conference.

I

t is safe to conclude that in vitro experiments are the most commonly applied methods in dental research. The scope and applicability of in vitro testing methods for demineralization, remineralization, and fluoridation were reviewed in detail at preceding conferences, including the 1990 Workshop on Technological Advances in Intra-oral Model Systems to Assess Cariogenicity [J Dent Res 71(4)(Spec Iss), 1992] and the 1989 Joint IADR/ORCA International Symposium on Fluorides [J Dent Res 69(2)(Spec Iss), 1990]. At the 1990 conference, this author undertook a review of various model systems used to evaluate the anticaries efficacy of topical fluoride agents. In that paper, the relative advantages and limitations of in vitro laboratory testing methods were compared with in situ and animal models (White, 1992). The literature search associated with this current review demonstrated that in vitro models/protocols remain at the forefront of caries research. A Medline/Biosis search of published and abstract literature revealed well over 300 stand-alone in vitro model studies carried out since 1989, encompassing demineralization, remineralization, and fluoridation of enamel and/or dentin. The purpose of the present review is to update the current state of the art in in vitro model testing of demineralization and remineralization evolving from the preceding conferences and summaries of recent literature. The review will be focused on two primary areas of laboratory research: (I) studies devoted to measurement of mineral changes in enamel and changes effected by topically applied agents, including remineralization, demineralization, and pH cycling protocols; and (II) studies devoted to measures of topical fluoridation efficiency, including fluoride uptake, retention, and release. IN VITRO STUDIES

OF REMINERALIZATION, DEMINERALIZATION, PH CYCLING (COMBINED) DE- AND REMINERALIZATION In vitro studies of remineralization— models and recent applications In vitro remineralization models include experiments directed toward determining fundamental factors important to caries lesion repair and the efficacy of treatment modalities in potentiating lesion consolidation. Remineralization protocols can be grouped into three general categories. In pH-lattice ion 'drift' methods, substrates are exposed to constant-volume supersaturated remineralization solutions, and crystallization is allowed to proceed non-

175 Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

176

WHITE

Calcium

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

Calcium

1 5s

o§ c

Phosphate

o

I 3H 2 Levels in Saturated Solution

1 -

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Remineralization Time

Remineralization Time

Fig. 1— Simulation of calcium and phosphate lattice ion concentration changes which typically occur in 'drift' experimental protocols.

Fig. 2—Simulation of calcium and phosphate lattice ion concentrations in constant-composition studies.

controlled, with associated decreases in lattice ion calcium and phosphate and, in unbuffered systems, pH. Fig. 1 illustrates concentration changes associated with mineralization processes in these experiments. These methods have the advantage of direct chemical measurement of remineralization within a given exposure period (ten Cate and Duijsters, 1982); however, they are limited in that the thermodynamic supersaturation driving remineralization decreases rapidly during treatment, thereby artificially restricting mineral redeposition. The relative thermodynamic supersaturation can be defined in terms of the activity products of ions contributing to the solubility product of the enamel phase in equilibrium—approximated as hydroxyapatite, as follows:

either flow-through (high volume) techniques or titrationcontrolled supersaturation. In constant-composition experiments, lattice ion concentrations and pH remain constant throughout remineralization, as illustrated in Fig. 2. In the flow-through techniques, supersaturation during remineralization is kept constant by means of a high volume of remineralization medium, thereby ensuring a constant thermodynamic driving force during remineralization (Buskes et al, 1985; Herkstroter et al, 1991). Flow-through designs permit multi-group studies to be carried out. The measurement of remineralization is confined to substrate changes. Fig. 3 shows the experimental design for the study of remineralization under flow-through constant-composition conditions (from Buskes et al, 1985). In titration-controlled constant-composition studies, the composition of the remineralization media is maintained by the controlled addition of calcium phosphate lattice ions and buffer titrants monitored potentiometrically by pH and/or calcium ionselective electrodes (Amjad et al, 1981; White et al, 1988b), as illustrated in Fig. 4. These techniques use the principles established for crystallization studies of apatites, as described originally by Nancollas and colleagues (Koutsoukos et al, 1980; Tomson and Nanccllas, 1978). The advantage of the titration-controlled constant-composition techniques is direct measurement of remineralization by solution changes (in this case titrant) without the limitations of changing supersaturation. Drawbacks of these techniques are the requirement for extra titrant assemblies for multi-group experiments and difficulty in predicting the phase composition of remineralizing minerals—a requirement to ensure titrant compensation of static supersaturation. Substrates used for in vitro remineralization studies typically include enamel or dentin slabs prepared with

K l/9

(1)

where the parentheses denote ion activities in solution, and K SP(HAP) represents the solubility product of hydroxyapatite mineral. In the presence of fluoride, Eq. (1) is modified in that the operative solubility product may be that of a fully or partially substituted fluoroapatite, and the ion product must include contributions from the fluoride ion activity in solution. (The calculation of the effective thermodynamic driving force in fact further depends upon ion association in plaque fluid and saliva and is the source of continued research.) The changes in supersaturation during remineralization can have an effect not only on the amount of mineral formed but also on both the type and location of mineral phases deposited (Nancollas, 1982; White etal, 1988b; LeGeros, 1991). The other two types of in vitro remineralization protocols include constant-composition methods which encompass

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

Voi.9(3)

177

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

I

00

00

,,H Combustion |lmpulso>

Double-Walled Reaction Vessel—* Thermostated at37C

Fig. 4—Constant-composition titration-controlled system for remineralization experiments. Here, titrants compensate for remineralization, with titrant amounts indicative of reaction.

Fig, 3—Experimental set-up of a typical constantcomposition 'high volume' system (from Buskes et al., 1985). Enamel specimens are held in H, as shown in panel 'a'. Mineralization titrant flows over specimens, as shown in '£>'. Electrodes E and sensor S ensure proper solution delivery to specimens. Solution flows through inlet (1) and outlet (2). The ability to mineralize/demineralize multiple treatment groups of specimens simultaneously is an advantage of this system. (Reproduced with permission o/Caries Research, S. Karger Publishers.) artificial caries lesions (e.g., White, 1987a) or in some cases directly include sections of natural lesions (Silverstone, 1983). More recently, researchers have applied the use of single sections of artificial caries lesions in in vitro remineralization models. The single-section substrates are highly valued in intra-oral models to reduce specimen variability associated with remineralization/demineralization (ten Cate, 1986; Mellberg et al., 1992; Stephen et al., 1992; Wefel and Jensen, 1992). In principle, single sections provide investigators with the ability to measure mineral changes accurately at repeated time periods of exposure, with re-

introduction of specimens into media to continue the process. Because of the limited surface area of the substrate, these techniques represent constant supersaturation without the need for flow-through or 'high volume' experimental logistics. Figs. 5 and 6 show the preparation and use of single sections in typical in vitro experiments. In some instances, single-section studies provide an ideal means to elucidate mechanistic factors important to caries prevention. For example, in a recent study, Exterkate et al. (1993) used single sections to examine rate and localization of remineralization of subsurface lesions at various Ca/P ratios and supersaturations. They observed that initial remineralization rates in subsurface lesions are extremely fast, followed by reduced rates with time. This result matches previous observations in the literature (ten Cate, 1990) and should be carefully considered by in situ researchers who place freshly prepared artificial caries lesions in intra-oral appliances and measure remineralization activity over extremely short periods. These researchers further observed that remineralization was easily localized to the surface zone and that Ca/P ratios strongly influenced the location of mineral deposition, with lesion consolidation encouraged under Ca/P ratios resembling apatite stoichiometry. Obviously, these types of insights are difficult to derive from in vivo or animal research experiments, thus highlighting the advantage of experimental control provided within in vitro models. Along similar lines, numerous in vitro investigations continue to examine in detail important features associated with remineralization which would be difficult if not impossible to study in vivo. These include mechanistic investigations of dentin remineralization (Arends et al., 1989b, 1990a; Clarkson et al. 1991; Klont and ten Cate, 1990, 1991), studies of the influence of lesion structure on remineralization/demineralization (Fusayama, 1991; Klont and ten Cate, 1991; Redelberger et al., 1991; Larsen and Pearce, 1992; Collys et al., 1993), studies of the influence of

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

178

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

Solution in *

enamel slab from bovine incisor Demineralizing Solution

Vent

- » Solution out

Section

X-ray beam

Exposed surface

Fig. 6—Cell for flow-through mineralization of a single section, 'x' indicates surface against which microradiograms are measured. (Reproduced from Anderson and Elliott, 1992, with permission of the J Dent Res, American Association for Dental Research, publisher.)

embedding

trimming and removal of outer surface Fig. 5—Procedures involved in single-section preparation for in vitro or in situ research. Lab = labial surface. (Reproduced from Exterkate et al., 1993, with permission of the J Dent Res, American Association for Dental Research, publisher.)

solution chemical factors on remineralization and crystal growth (supersaturation, F, CO3, etc.) (Featherstone et al, 1990; Goldberg et al, 1990; Lammers et al. 1989, 1990, 1991a,b, 1992), and studies of the effects of surface-active agents and treatments on remineralization processes (Kiss et al, 1990; Borggreven et al, 1991; Johnsson et al, 1991; Arends et al, 1992a; Raj et al, 1992; Reddy and Indushekar, 1992; Richardson et al, 1993). In vitro studies of demineralization— models and recent applications Tooth decay is the result of progressive mineral loss from dental tissues. In vitro demineralization models enable

researchers selectively to examine fundamental processes associated with mineral loss from the teeth. Research on demineralization is extensive and has been reviewed recently (Featherstone et al, 1990; Larsen, 1990; ten Cate, 1990, 1992). As in remineralization, models devoted to demineralization include constant-composition methods (Buskes et al, 1987; Chow and Takagi, 1989; Gao et al, 1993) and methods allowing pH/lattice ion/undersaturation drift. In the latter methods, time-dependent decreases in undersaturation limit the extent of demineralization possible, depending upon the volume/surface area ratio within media. A major difference between demineralization and remineralization models involves substrates used in testing. While remineralization methods typically use lesions (treated or control) as substrate, demineralization models utilize a wider variety of substrates, including those pre-treated with chemical agents (fluoride), pre-treated and remineralized with chemical agents, or natural enamel or root surface lesions. Some recent applications of in vitro demineralization testing include mechanistic studies of solution/substrate factors affecting demineralization (Rentsch et al, 1990; Gao et al, 1991; Redelberger et al, 1991; Anderson and Elliott, 1992), direct comparisons of demineralization (and remineralization) in vitro and in vivo (Collys et al, 1991; Arends et al, 1992a,b), studies of factors contributing to the intrinsic resistance of mineralized tissue to acid demineralization (DeGroot et al, 1986; Creanor et al, 1989; Petzold et al, 1990; Faller et al, 1991; Arends et al, 1992a; Boonstra et al, 1993; Gangler et al, 1993), studies of demineralization kinetics of remineralized lesions (Iijma and Koulourides, 1989; Lammers et al, 1991a, 1992; Iijima et al, 1993; Tanaka et al, 1993), and investigations into the effects of solution- and substrate-bound fluoride on acid resistance (Feagin and Graves, 1988; Chu et al, 1989; Samarawickrama and Speirs, 1993). As would be expected,

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL9(3)

n

2 o

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

3 -

2 -

Mineral Gained

s Q

1

-

z Baseline Substrate Mineral Content

3 2 UJ

-1— Mineral Gained -2 -

I UJ

1

-3 -

0

O

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

TIME (ARBITRARY UNITS)

Fig. 7—Mineral flux associated with pH-cy cling progression and reversal models.

numerous in vitro demineralization studies continue to be published examining chemical treatments, agents, procedures, and natural substances which may inhibit or promote apatite enamel and dentin dissolution (e.g., Arends et al, 1986, 1989a, 1990a, 1992d; Clarkson et al, 1986; Gedalia et al., 1986, 1991; Okazaki et al, 1986; Crall and Bjerga, 1987; Nieuw-Amerongen et al, 1987; Stabholz et al, 1987; Collys et al, 1988, 1990; Ettinger et al, 1988; Purton and Rodda, 1988; Seppa, 1988; van Dorp et al, 1988; Borggreven et al, 1989; Derand et al, 1989; Ott, 1989; Tadmor et al, 1989; van der Linden, 1989; Boonstra et al, 1990, 1993; Grobler et al, 1990; Yue et al, 1990; Christoffersen et al, 1991; Larsen, 1991; Seppa and Forss, 1991; Donly and Ruiz, 1992; Featherstone et al, 1993; Hell wig et al, 1993; Kautsky and Featherstone, 1993; Lussi et al, 1993; Spets-Happonen et al, 1993; Grogono and Mayo, 1994; Hook et al, 1994; Sorvari et al, 1994a; Souto and Donly, 1994; Wikiel et al, 1994). In vitro demineralization protocols have also recently been applied as diagnostic tests for the modifying effects of laser treatments on enamel and dentin (Tagomori and Morioka, 1989; Oho and Morioka, 1990; Fox et al, 1992; Nammour et al, 1992). In vitro studies of pH cycling— models and recent applications 'pH cycling' refers to in vitro experimental protocols including exposure of substrates, enamel, or dentin, to combinations of remineralization and demineralization. These combination experiments are designed to simulate the dynamic variations in mineral saturation and pH associated

179

with the natural caries process. pH-cycling models, at their most basic, can involve a simple topical treatment of sound/carious enamel with an agent, followed by secondary acid exposures to measure effects on subsequent demineralization rates. Koulourides (1980), in pioneering studies of 'acquired acid resistance', in fact exposed artificial lesions to topical remineralization solutions and measured subsequent resistance of treated areas to secondary acid attacks, thus carrying out some of the first truly 'cycling experiments'. Today, pH-cycling models refer to more complex and detailed types of protocols. The genesis of modern pH-cycling protocols was produced by ten Cate and Duijsters (1982). This protocol involved numerous cycles of demineralization and remineralization, with mineral uptake and loss measured chemically with eventual matching of total mineral flux to distributions assessed by microradiography. In vitro pH-cycling models can generally be classified into progression (Featherstone et al, 1986; White and Featherstone, 1987; Page, 1991) or reversal models (White, 1987a, 1988), depending upon the net flux of mineral to/from the tooth substrate, as shown in Fig. 7. As reviewed by ten Cate (1990, 1992), modern pHcycling models have become methods of choice for many caries researchers applying in vitro techniques, because they provide better simulation of the caries process for both mechanistic studies and for profile evaluations of toothpastes and mouthrinses. The most significant development in the use of in vitro cycling models includes the recent applications of automated cycling techniques and comparison of treatment effects under various demineralization/remineralization ratios. Almqvist, in a series of studies (Almqvist et al, 1990; Almqvist and Lagerlof, 1993a,b), applied a continuous delivery system to provide control of multiple pH cycles and to provide fluoride clearance characteristics simulating intra-oral effects after topical treatments. The authors applied 125I absorptiometry for evaluation of lesion substrate mineral changes. Herkstroter et al (1991) applied automated pH cycling in a flow-through system to examine the effects of surface layers in sound enamel on lesion progress in the presence of fluoride. Robinson et al (1992) used chemical analysis in automated cycling to examine lesion progression under pHcycling conditions. Kirkham et al (1994) used automated cycling to compare the effects of various cycling ratios on lesion progression. Since their inception, pH-cycling protocols have served as powerful means for providing mechanistic insights into the caries process and preventive measures, and applications of these models for these purposes continue today. ADA profile applications of dentifrices in remineralization/demineralization models Following the conference on model systems in 1990, a major focus of researchers was on development of in vitro models meeting suggested ADA guidelines associated with topical evaluations of dentifrices (Chilton, 1992; Proskin, 1992). pH-

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

180

WHITE

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

TABLE 1 DOSE-RESPONSE EVALUATION OF DENTIFRICE EFFICACY IN pH-CYCLING LESION REVERSAL (Faller, 1992) AZ pH Cycling (Am x Vol%)

Dentifrice Formulation (ppm F as NaF)

+145 -86 -140 -190 -222

1 275 550 825 1100

cycling models have been the primary focus of efforts toward meeting these guidelines. The majority of this work has been carried out by industry, and unfortunately (for this review), most of this research is only in the form of abstracts. Nevertheless, the results of some of these efforts are cited here to illustrate progress in this regard. Several research groups have demonstrated the ability of pH-cycling protocols to meet dose-response (0, 250 ppm and 1100 ppm F as NaF or SMFP) activity in both enamel and dentin (Dunipace et al, 1992; Faller, 1992; Barrett-Vespone et al, 1993; Kim et al, 1994; Schemehorn et al, 1994). Results for a representative model are shown in Table 1, where the clear dose responses of NaF from 1 to 250 to 1100 ppm F are illustrated in the form of changes in the mineral content of lesions (AZ = area produced by lesion measured in volume % mineral x scanning depth) (Faller, 1992). Protocols successfully meeting ADA guidelines included measures of lesion reversal (Faller, 1992) and progression (Barrett-Vespone et al, 1993). Studies have also examined fluoride toothpaste efficacy in dose ranges above the conventional fluoride levels, in an effort to broaden model clinical relevance (Bowman et al, 1988; Featherstone et al,

1988a; Damato et al, 1990; Heilman et al, 1991). Several more recent studies applying pH-cycling models include those listed in Table 2. Featherstone et al (1992) used their pH-cycling lesion progression model to demonstrate that sodium tripolyphosphate, a tartar control crystallization inhibitor, had no effect on the activity of fluoridated dentifrice. This result matches well with previous results obtained with tartar control toothpastes incorporating pyrophosphate, examined in this same model (Featherstone et al, 1988b, 1989). From a methodological standpoint, Macpherson et al. (1991) used a pH-cycling protocol to observe that enamel collected from different sites exhibited different demineralization sensitivities. Schemehorn et al. (1992) demonstrated that pH-cycling models met validation standards using either bovine or human enamel substrates. In a practical utilization of in vitro techniques separate from F toothpaste evaluation, Joyston-Bechal and Kidd (1987) examined various artificial salivas for their ability to promote remineralization. With respect to utilization in profile applications and the emerging ADA guidelines, this author believes that the conclusions reached in the 1990 review of comparative

TABLE 2 SOME RECENT PROFILE APPLICATIONS OF pH-CYCLING MODELS Reference Barrett-Vespone et al, 1993 Kim era/., 1994 Schemehorn et al, 1994 Barrett-Vespone et al, 1994 Dunipace et al, 1992 Heilman^ a/., 1992 Faller, 1992 Heilman^ a/., 1991 Damato ef al, 1990 Heilman and Wefel, 1994

Remineralization Analysis

Observation

AZ*

NaF dose response SMFP dose response NaF dose response NaF and SMFP dose response NaF > SMFP > placebo NaF dose response NaF dose response NaF > placebo NaF rinse dose response above 1100 ppmF NaF in baking soda paste

Microhardness Microhardness

AZ AZ AZ, polarized light

AZ AZ, polarized light

AZ AZ, polarized light

*AZ = Mineral content (\xm x vol%) within enamel in cross-section.

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL.9(3)

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

models systems still remain valid today (White, 1992). In vitro model systems remain easy to modify and validate in order to simulate clinical efficacy correlations under controlled experimental conditions, ideally permitting single variable experiments to be carried out. On the other hand, in vitro protocols provide only limited information predicting the efficacy of new chemical agents or comparing the clinical efficacy of different agents, due to their restricted capacity to account for the entire biological process involved in caries. Limitations of in vitro remineralization/demineralization models The limitations of in vitro test systems for both mechanistic and profile applications were summarized in a previous review (White, 1992). Overall, in vitro models are mechanistically limited in three key ways: inadequate simulation of biological aspects of caries, difficulty in matching solid/solution ratios occurring in vivo, and artifacts associated with substrate choice/reaction conditions. The inability to match the breadth of relevant biological conditions limits the clinical relevance of in vitro test results and profile applications of these models. From a biological perspective, it is virtually impossible for in vitro models adequately to simulate the complex and diverse intra-oral conditions contributing to caries development. Although researchers have previously investigated in vitro 'artificial mouth' systems, including bacterial plaque and artificial saliva (e.g., Viazis, 1989; Viazis et al, 1990; DeLong and Douglas, 1991; Simonsson et al, 1991; Sissons et al, 1991, 1992; Pearce et al, 1992; Sakaguchi et al, 1992; Douglas et al, 1993; Hellwig et al, 1993; Sorvari et ah, 1994b), the absolute merits of these model systems today must be critically assessed in light of advances in in situ and animal caries protocols. Most recent in vitro studies of de- and remineralization, including dental plaque/saliva, have been directed not toward simulation of 'artificial mouth' conditions, but rather toward examining the effects of selected salivary/plaque properties in a controlled environment in single variable experiments (e.g., Zameck and Tinanoff, 1987; van Loveren et al, 1991; Blake-Haskins et al, 1992; Firestone et al, 1993; Wahab et al, 1993). A second limitation of in vitro protocols is the difficulty in simulating the volume and composition of saliva and tooth surface area encountered in in vivo remineralization. The proper simulation of in vivo remineralization would require knowledge of fluid volume, coverage, and transport over substrate surfaces accounting for dynamic variations under dental plaque (Weatherell et al, 1986; Larsen and Fejerskov, 1989; Oliveby et al, 1990; Macpherson and Dawes, 1991, 1994; Pearce, 1991; Dawes and Macpherson, 1993). A further complication is that it is quite clear that different oral surfaces {e.g., maxillary/mandibular) are bathed in different volumes and source combinations of saliva (Dawes, 1993). Researchers typically attempt to account for saliva volume by varying volume/supersaturation (in 'drift assays') or by bathing media volume (in constant-composition flow-through

181

systems). In the case of supersaturation adjustment (i.e., calcium/phosphate content of media), the increases in local concentrations of calcium and phosphate in vitro cannot possibly account for the large volumes of saliva secreted in vivo and in addition can create artifacts of surface-dominated mineralization. Within flow-through systems, larger volumes of remineralization solutions can be used, but these cannot simulate intra-oral surface area/volume precisely. In either case, artificial salivas cannot account for calcium binding and substrate-surface adsorption effects of saliva macromolecules and low-molecular-weight solutes which affect intra-oral mineralization (Arends et al, 1992d; Featherstone et al, 1993; Williams and Wu, 1993). In vitro systems using saliva as a remineralization medium (White 1987b, 1988) can experience artifacts due to extra-oral breakdown of saliva. Unfortunately, the simulation of intra-oral demineralization by in vitro protocols is equally poor. For demineralization, knowledge of acid anion profiles, pH changes on the lesion surface, diffusion rates of acids/salivary buffers, and kinetics of sugar/acid transport would be required for precise simulation of undersaturation variations associated with acid challenges to the tooth surface. Most test methods use constant-concentration acid challenges in solution volumes in large excess to substrate surface area, essentially mimicking constant-composition conditions, which are surely never present in in vivo demineralization. Thus, in vitro models cannot mimic solid surface area/solution ratios and saliva/plaque fluid composition encountered in vivo. These limitations should be kept in perspective in attempts to correlate in vitro changes directly with in vivo responses to agents and treatment modalities. A third mechanistic limitation encountered by in vitro models (and by in situ models as well) involves artifacts associated with choice of substrate and test conditions, particularly the time periods (rates) of de- and remineralization used in studies. With respect to time, it must be considered that in vitro test systems examining de- and remineralization necessarily accelerate the mineral dynamics associated with the caries process and reversal into much shorter time periods than occur in vivo. For example, it is not uncommon today to see the development of from 1 to 3 new carious surfaces, on average, within children in a three-year caries clinical trial. Conservatively assuming that an interproximal lesion must extend 1.5 mm from the enamel surface into dentin for x-ray detection, a newly developing lesion would have advanced 1500 urn within three years, or at a linear (see Arends et al, 1992d) rate of 1-2 urn a day. Artificial caries lesions are routinely placed into in vitro or in situ remineralization studies with lesion depths ranging from 50 to 150 urn. These lesion depths can be taken to represent the equivalent of some three months' clinical formation prior to topical exposure or further pH cycling. Such dynamics do not occur in vivo. In pH-cycling (progression) or demineralization studies, researchers typically see the development of 100-250-um lesions in periods as short as days or weeks, representing up to six to 12 months of clinical lesion progression. It is also important to emphasize that

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

182

WHITE

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

TABLE 3 PROFILE COMPARISON OF DENTIFRICES FOR FLUORIDE UPTAKE (Faller et al, 1994) Dentifrice Formulation Placebo 250 ppm NaF2 1100 ppm NaF + 5% KNO3 (marketed product) 1100 ppm NaF + 5% KNO3 (Crest Sensitiv. Protection) 1100 ppm NaF (Crest® Control)

F Uptake in pH Cycling (|Lig/cm2)

Rat Caries Inhibition %

2.5 a ' ! 8.2b

25b

8.4b

50c

26.0c

86d

nm3

80d

]

ppm NaF = as F. Means with different superscript letters significantly different at p < 0.05. 3 nm = not measured.

2

substrate selection/preparation can have a strong impact upon experimental results in vitro, with the choice of material affecting secondary rates of reactivity as well as sensitivity to various agents (Strang et al, 1987, 1988; Damato et al., 1988; Wucherpfenning et aly 1990; Mellberg, 1991, 1992; Schafer et al., 1992). Investigators should keep these effects in mind in mechanistic and profile applications of in vitro models.

FLUORIDE UPTAKE—'BIOAVAILABILITY' Fluoride uptake is the primary 'bioavailability' measurement available for validating the activity of fluoridated dental products. In The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Gilman et al (1990) observed: "'Bioavailability' is the term used to indicate...the extent to which a drug reaches its site of action or reaches a biological fluid from which the drug has access to its site of action". By this definition, the measurement of fluoride uptake into enamel and dentin satisfies the measurement of a drug reaching its site of action, while the measurement of fluoride levels within in vivo plaque or saliva satisfies the measurement of drug levels in biological fluids with access to the site of action (Raven et al, 1991; Duckworth et al, 1992a,b). Measurements of fluoride uptake (within a fluoride-active class—e.g., NaF vs. NaF; SMFP vs. SMFP) into carious enamel are required by ADA and FDA for confirmation of the generic efficacy of fluoridated dentifrices and rinses. As profile tests, F uptake measures are more important evidence of bioequivalence than analytical measures of topical fluoride content, because bioavailability measures account for overall F reactivity, which can be affected by solution complexation, diffusion, local pH, and surface-active interfering agents. The latter are not expressed in simple availability measures. Today, mechanistic studies of fluoride reactivity have expanded beyond simple uptake measurements to include assessment of the type, location,

and subsequent secondary reactivity of reaction products formed within and on substrates. In vitro models are especially suitable for careful study of the mechanistic aspects of fluoridation, since experiments can be performed free of risks of contamination due to other dietary and topical sources of fluoride. Models used in in vitro fluoride uptake evaluations and current trends in mechanism-based research are briefly highlighted below. In vitro fluoride uptake in carious enamel It is well-known (and continuously reconfirmed—e.g., Chan et al, 1991) that fluoride reactivity from virtually all topical systems is increased dramatically in carious vs. sound enamel. As a result of this, the majority of required in vitro (and in situ) screening evaluations of toothpastes and mouthrinses include studies of fluoride uptake into artificial caries lesions. The measurements of uptake, remineralization, and secondary acid resistance make possible the combined measures of efficiency of fluoride delivery and impact of delivered fluoride on both lesion repair and resistance to caries progression. In typical in vitro models, artificial lesions are treated with the formulation/agent of interest, and the amount of fluoride acquired under standardized conditions is analytically determined (White, 1992). Analytical methods essentially involve isolation of the lesion material (by either biopsy, chemical etching, or abrasion), solubilization of the lesion material, and measurement by fluoride electrode. Today, fluoride uptake measures are often included as a subset analysis within pH cycling de- and remineralization protocols, thereby facilitating the unique measurement of bioavailability (uptake) and pharmacological activity (remineralization/demineralization) within the same model. Fluoride uptake assessments provide important bioavailability assays for toothpastes and mouthrinses, since they can quickly identify deficiencies in formulations in the transport of fluoride to enamel (White, 1992). For example,

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

VOL9(3)

as shown in Table 3, relatively simple experiments have revealed substantial deficiencies in fluoride delivery from marketed products, which translated into reduced anticaries activity in animal models as well (Faller et al, 1994; Shaffer et al.f 1994). The methods, benefits, and limitations of fluoride uptake measurements for both profile and mechanistic applications have been reviewed in detail (Arends and Christoffersen, 1990; Chow, 1990; Margolis and Moreno, 1990; White and Nancollas, 1990; Ingram etal, 1992; White, 1992). In vitro fluoride uptake in sound enamel The fluoride levels in most over-the-counter (OTC) dentifrices and mouthrinses are not sufficient to produce significant amounts of reactivity with sound enamel. As a result of this, fluoride uptake from dentifrices and mouthwashes is typically assessed in artificial caries lesions rather than in sound enamel. However, sound enamel measurements still remain a focus of researchers evaluating professionally applied fluorides, where the concentration and pH of application would drive significant reactivity on non-decalcified surfaces. In a typical protocol, either powdered or sound enamel and dentin are treated with professional gel or varnish, and fluoridation is analytically measured as described earlier (e.g., Barbakow et al, 1988; White, 1992). Today, these measures are often accompanied by measurements of the surface properties of treated substrates and the F release from the treated surfaces. In the case of professionally applied products, bioavailability may be defined in a number of ways: the amount of fluoride taken up by enamel/dentin, the retention of fluoride within enamel and/or dentin, or the ability of the treated surfaces to provide low levels of fluoride in saliva. Measurements of fluoride 'release' as a primary bioavailability measure in in vitro evaluations include recent studies of topically applied solutions (Saxegaard and Rolla, 1988; Skartveit et al, 1991), F-releasing resins and restorative materials (Temin et al, 1989; Arends et al, 1990b; Arends and van der Zee, 1990; Chan et al, 1990; Dionysopoulos et al, 1990; Donly and Ruiz, 1992; Dijkman et al, 1993), bonding systems (Tsanidis and Koulourides, 1992), professionally applied gels (Mok et al, 1990; Takagi et al, 1992), occlusal sealants (van Dorp and ten Cate, 1992), and varnishes (Koch etal, 1988; Seppa, 1988; Bruun and Givskov, 1991; Eronat et al, 1993). Recent studies have also examined the fluoridation of cementum (Brewer et al, 1987). In vitro fluoride uptake—mechanism studies—reaction products, location of deposition, and release in solution Despite the vast number of studies relating enamel/lesion fluoride uptake to anticaries effects, research suggests that our understanding of the relation between fluoridation and caries prevention is incomplete. In particular, it is now recognized that fluoride agents can provide similar levels of fluoride uptake on sound enamel or in carious enamel while differing dramatically in three critical elements affecting efficacy: (1) nature and composition of the fluoridation reaction products, (2) the location of deposited fluoride,

183

and/or (3) the secondary reactivity of the acquired fluoride (e.g., mobility). At the Callaway Gardens Joint IADR/ORCA symposium [J Dent Res 69(2)(Spec Iss), 1990], a series of reviews documented the literature relating enamel/dentin fluoridation to caries prevention and provided these general conclusions: • Fluoride uptake onto enamel and into lesions (that is, incorporated into the mineral component of the tooth) is necessary but not sufficient in describing caries protection from fluoride—caries protection must be defined in terms of mineral lost and mineral gained; • Fluoride in the enamel/dentin mineral phase provides only modest protection against acid demineralization and provides little benefit to remineralization; • Fluoride in solution provides significant benefits in reducing tooth demineralization rates and in enhancing remineralization rates. Consistent with these observations, considerable in vitro research has been devoted to detailed analysis of reaction products formed by fluoride, the location of fluoride deposition, and the secondary reactivity of fluoride taken up by enamel and dentin—particularly the provision of fluoride in the liquid phase to enhance remineralization and diminish demineralization. These research efforts have been assisted substantially by improvements in physical-chemical and spectroscopic methods for the assessment of the location and composition of fluoride on surfaces and in solution. With respect to reaction products, researchers continue to speculate on the potential anticaries effects of calcium fluoride reaction products in and on enamel (Dijkman and Arends, 1988; Rolla, 1988; Saxegaard and Rolla, 1988, 1989; Ogaard et al, 1990; Cruz et al, 1991, 1992, 1993; Bruun and Givskov, 1993). Recently, Rolla and colleagues have used in vitro techniques systematically to document factors affecting calcium fluoride formation and equilibria in plaque, enamel, and dentin (Cruz et al, 1991, 1993). Experiments confirmed that the formation of calcium fluoride from topical application of NaF is both concentration- and pH-dependent, with apatite dissolution accompanying redeposition of fluoride (Duschner and Uchtmann, 1988a,b; Saxegaard and Rolla, 1988). Both NaF and SMFP dentifrices have been suggested to form calcium fluoride within plaque and teeth (Arends et al, 1988). Once formed, calcium fluoride equilibria were shown to be strongly influenced by saliva inorganic and organic components (Christofferson et al, 1988; Lagerlof et al, 1988; Saxegaard, 1988; Saxegaard et al, 1988; Rykke et al, 1989; Matsuo et al, 1990). Newly developed microraman techniques (Tsuda and Arends, 1993a,b) and NMR (White et al, 1988a, 1992) can precisely identify CaF2 as a reaction product in enamel and dentin. Using NMR, Nelson and colleagues (Arends et al, 1984; White et al, 1994) identified a new F reaction product, Non Specifically Adsorbed Fluoride (NSAF), as an important product of enamel fluoridation. As shown in Fig. 8, NSAF represents fluoride ions hydrogen-bonded to apatitic surfaces

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

184 Ca 7 '

.

(calciumrich)

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

.

Ca2#

Ca2#

Ca2*

F-hydrogen bonding -F'

f'

H

H6+

.«• '

H 1-

»• I

H 2- I

H 2- '

2- : .

Ca2* H 2-1

3-

F"

F'

H

H

2-1

2- i

-. po ^o^ p P Pv P.

cv ^o^ po^ pbP. P. P.

°s P°v pc c c o P P P p

z : / zc o

z \ c \ o

o\c\n

c

\

50 q

J N

-

10-5

•namtl crystaHtes

F/g. 8—Structure of NSAF fluoride as proposed by Nelson, in Arends et al., 1984. (Reproduced with permission ofS. Karger Publishers.)

through surface acid phosphate species. Initially identified as a reaction product of low-level fluoridation of enamel, NSAF has been observed as an initial reaction product within carious enamel from topical dentifrice use as well and may be indicative of the solution F L species described by Arends (1995). In some practical applications, Barkvoll et al. (1988) used an in vitro protocol to demonstrate that calcium fluoride formation was strongly affected by product components like surfactant-sodium lauryl sulfate. Similarly, Franco and Cury (1994) demonstrated that F uptake from aqueous solution was inhibited by surfactant available in commercial 'plaque removal' mouthwash. In another in vitro study, Yu et al. (1993) observed CaF2-like deposits on enamel following treatments with tannin-fluoride mixtures. Chow and coworkers (Chow and Takagi, 1991; Chow et al, 1992; Takagi et al., 1992) have used in vitro studies in their efforts to develop new cariostatic reaction systems containing fluorosilicate/monocalcium phosphate combinations providing elevated levels of CaF2 formation. Studies of the precise anticaries actions of fluoride are complicated by the fact that dental caries is a subsurface phenomenon rather than simple erosion. Controlled singlevariable in vitro protocols are ideal for the study of factors affecting the location of deposition, equilibration, and migration of fluoride within enamel and dentin (Clarkson et al, 1988; Iijima and Koulourides, 1989). This research has been facilitated by improved physical analytical techniques such as SIMS (Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry) (Petersson et al, 1989; Corpron et al, 1992; Iijima et al, 1993) and microprobe methods (Tveit et al., 1988) which can complement cross-sectioned mineral evaluations from transversal microradiography (Nelson et al, 1992). From these and other studies, it is becoming increasingly clear that topical fluoride reactivity from most sources occurs (at least initially) in enamel and dentin (lesion) surface layers, with redistribution occurring under secondary acid attack. F redistribution is often associated with mineral laminations within lesions. Chu et al (1989) have developed computer models to describe F migration and uptake within developing lesions.

0.1-=

0.0110 DAYS 15 Fig. 9—Measurement of fluoride loss (every 24 h) after topical treatment as an example of traditional measurement ofF lability. (Reproduced from Skartveit et al., 1991, with permission of Ada. Odontol Scand, Scandinavian University Press, publisher.)

As suggested earlier, researchers today are interested not only in the location and composition of mineral reaction products of fluoride treatment but also in the solution equilibrium resulting from these products under both de- and remineralizing conditions. Of particular interest are investigations of the labile (solution) fluoride levels in pseudo-equilibrium within lesions, plaque fluid, and saliva (Shern et al, 1987; Saxegaard and Rolla, 1989; Margolis, 1990; Sidi and Wilson, 1991; Duckworth et al, 1992a,b, 1994; Featherstone and Zero, 1992; Margolis and Moreno, 1992; ten Cate, 1992). A focus of in vitro research in recent years has thus been to characterize the effects of topical treatments in providing 'solution' levels of fluoride. At its simplest, the delivery of 'labile' fluoride can be assessed by measures of the release of fluoride from enamel/dentin substrates into aqueous solution following treatments. This is commonly applied to studies of fluoridating properties of varnishes and resins (e.g., Skartveit et al, 1991), as illustrated in Fig. 9. Takagi et al (1992) have developed a novel titration technique to monitor directly the uptake and release of labile fluoride in lesions following topical treatment. Their method involves potentiostat-controlled (F ion selective electrode) back-titration of fluoride from treated caries lesions into a low-level baseline equilibrium solution. The technique provides an excellent measure of solution fluoride equilibria which complements conventional fluoride uptake measurements. Results of their studies are illustrated

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL9 (3)

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

185

different fluoride sources.) There would appear to be no difficulty in designing in vitro models meeting validation requirements of regulatory bodies for fluoride uptake, as evidenced by recent research, and this aspect will not be discussed further here. Such excellent empirical correlations may seem surprising in light of the preceding discussion on the relative importance of bound and labile fluoride for caries prevention, the impact of fluoride location on potential reactivity, and the critical importance of reaction products on both. Most likely, the predictive capability of fluoride uptake for anticaries activity within active systems is related to two factors: (1) Uptake models measure efficiency of fluoride delivery—this should, in principle, be related to topical efficacy (where uptake is time-dependent); and Fig. 10—Labile fluoride as measured in titration system of Takagi et al., 1992. F loss can be directly measured in g, accounting for titrant dilution. Loosely bound fluoride measured by titration is here plotted against time following treatment with various fluoride preparations. (Reproduced with permission o/Caries Res, S. Karger Publishers.)

in Fig. 10. Sieck et al. (1990) similarly described a constantcomposition method for assessing loosely bound vs. fixed fluoride during F washing from enamel. On a different scale, Vogel et al. (1988) have pioneered the measurement of F within the lesion at various locations within single sections undergoing in vitro demineralization and remineralization using ultra-micro-analytical techniques in their laboratory. As an alternative approach, Larsen et al. (1993) have recently examined fluoridation and remineralization of apatite powders in vitro at solid solution ratios mimicking in vivo microscopic solution chemical conditions. It is noteworthy that researchers interested in evaluating potential anticaries properties of fluoridated dental materials (such as bonding agents, restorative materials, etc.) use F release measurements essentially as a bioavailability assay, directing correlations to expected clinical caries protection of these materials in adjacent locations. F uptake assessments in profile applications As mentioned earlier, current profile assessments of fluoride bioavailability in vitro involve relatively simple measures of fluoride uptake (Naleway, 1985). In fact, F uptake is the best in vitro bioavailability marker for fluoride reactivity within proven clinical fluoride systems. In vitro studies of fluoridation have been shown to correlate well to both animal caries and in situ fluoridation/remineralization results within active systems and also to clinical effectiveness of different fluoride agents (White, 1992). (As for remineralization and demineralization protocols, the clinical relevance of in vitro F uptake measurments is limited in comparisons of new fluoridating agents or in comparing

(2) Greater F uptake in tissue likely manifests itself as increased local solution F as well as mineral F. Under acid challenges, such treated mineral likely provides solution fluoride within the lesion. Limitations to fluoride uptake Fluoride uptake protocols are experimentally affected by parameters similar to those of model systems designed to assess de- and remineralization. Thus, the choice of substrate (sound enamel, etched enamel, softened enamel, subsurface decalcified enamel), treatment conditions (type of treatment, time of treatment, washing, equilibration), and substrate equilibration media (volume, composition, pH) all greatly affect measured fluoridation results {e.g., Mellberg et al., 1991). Studies examining fluoridation of enamel and dentin also show a rather unique difference from remineralization/demineralization assessments in that they exhibit variability in the measured 'parameter' defining efficacy. For remineralization and demineralization models, mineral lost/gained is direct evidence of efficacy in experimental protocols. However, for F uptake, efficacy measures can include not only the amount of fluoride taken up but also the form of deposit. For example, published studies have reached entirely different conclusions regarding topical activity, depending upon whether the measured 'fluoridation' parameter involved fluoride uptake (total), KOH extractable fluoride, or firmly bound F (Klimek et al, 1982; Hellwig et al., 1987). In addition, as described earlier, there remains no general agreement as to whether F uptake protocols should direct assessments to simple evaluations of uptake, or include location and secondary reactivity of reacted fluorides. This remains a significant limitation in the evaluation of new fluoridation systems, since clinical standards are not readily available by which one can assess either the 'site' or the 'action' associated with 'bioavailability'. As for demineralization and remineralization, in vitro fluoridation assays suffer from limitations related to lack of simulation of biological conditions, including the actions of salivary phosphatases (of importance in SMFP/NaF comparisons). Last, as for all test methods, fluoridation results obtained from in

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

186

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

vitro protocols must be carefully examined for potential artifacts emanating from choices of treatment concentrations, periods, washing, etc. (e.g., Faller et al., 1990; Mellberg and Fletcher, 1990). Overall, F bioavailability assessments of oral products require the assessment of fluoridation efficiency in addition to de- and remineralization effects. The evaluation of new fluoridation agents or comparisons of different fluoride sources require more than simple uptake assessments, including more detailed measures of reaction products, location of reacted fluoride, and solution equilibria of reacted fluoride under conditions relevant to clinical caries formation and prevention (White, 1992).

SUMMARY The breadth and scope of research briefly described in this review ably demonstrate that in vitro demineralization, remineralization, and fluoridation studies remain important tools of dental researchers for both fundamental and applied (profile) testing purposes. The main advantage of in vitro testing which drives continued utilization (despite limitations) is that it provides investigators with the capability to perform single-variable experiments under controlled conditions. Such experimentation permits mechanistic studies to be performed which are difficult if not impossible to carry out in vivo (for example, see Carey et al., 1991). Furthermore, the controlled and easily modified conditions permitted by in vitro profile tests readily permit researchers using these models to produce data meeting regulatory (viz. ADA) guidelines. The translation of in vitro findings to clinical expectations for new active systems (whose mechanism of action may be unclear) or in comparing different topical agents is quite tenuous, owing to the limited capability of in vitro methods in simulating biological conditions (White, 1992). Nevertheless, well-designed in vitro experimentation into demineralization, remineralization, and fluoridation reactions represents a major focus of mechanism-based dental research into caries prevention, despite advances in in situ and animal caries models.

REFERENCES Almqvist H, Lagerlof F (1993a). Effect of intermittent delivery of fluoride to solution on root hard-tissue de- and remineralization measured by 125I absorptiometry. / Dent Res 72:1593-1598. Almqvist H, Lagerlof F (1993b). Influence of constant fluoride levels in solution on root hard tissue de- and remineralization measured by 125I absorptiometry. Caries /tes 27:100-105. Almqvist H, Lagerlof F, Angmar-Mansson B (1990). Automatic pH-cycling caries model applied on root hard tissue. Caries Res 24:1-5. Amjad Z, Koutsoukos PG, Nancollas GH (1981). The mineralization of enamel surfaces. A constant composition

kinetics study. J Dent Res 60:1783-1792. Anderson P, Elliott JC (1992). Subsurface demineralization in dental enamel and other permeable solids during acid dissolution. / Dent Res 71:1473-1481. Arends J (1995). The application of in vitro models to research on demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Reaction paper. Adv Dent Res 9: 194-197 . Arends J, Christoffersen J (1990). Nature and role of loosely bound fluoride in dental caries. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):601-605. Arends J, van der Zee Y (1990). Fluoride uptake in bovine enamel and dentin from a fluoride-releasing composite resin. Quintessence Int 21:541-544. Arends J, Nelson DGA, Dijkman AG, Jongebloed WL (1984). Effects of various fluorides on enamel structure and chemistry. In: Cariology today. Guggenheim B, editor. Basel: Karger, pp. 245-258. Arends J, Schuthof J, Christoffersen J (1986). Inhibition of enamel demineralization by albumin in vitro. Caries Res 20:337-340. Arends J, Reintsema H, Dijkman AG (1988). 'Calciumfluoride-like' material formed in partially demineralized human enamel in vivo owing to the action of fluoridated toothpastes. Ada Odontol Scand 46:347-353. Arends J, Ogaard B, Ruben J, Wemes J, Rolla G (1989a). Influence of glutardialdehyde on dentine demineralization in vitro and in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 97:297-300. Arends J, Christoffersen J, Ruben J, Jongebloed WL (1989b). Remineralization of bovine dentine in vitro. The influence of the F content in solution on mineral distribution. Caries Res 23:309-314. Arends J, Ruben JL, Christoffersen J, Jongebloed WL, Zuidgeest TGM (1990a). Remineralization of human dentine in vitro. Caries Res 24:432-435. Arends J, Ruben J, Dijkman AG (1990b). Effect of fluoride release from a fluoride-containing composite resin on secondary caries: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 21:671-674. Arends J, Smits M, Ruben JL, Christoffersen J (1990c). Combined effects of xylitol and fluoride on enamel demineralization in vitro. Caries Res 24:256-257. Arends J, Christoffersen J, Buskes JAKM, Ruben J (1992a). Effects of fluoride and methanehydroxydiphosphonate on enamel and on dentine demineralization. Caries Res 26:409-417. Arends J, Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Ogaard B, Dijkman AG, Jongebloed WL (1992b). Rate and mechanism of enamel demineralization in situ. Caries Res 26:18-21. Arends J, Dijkman AG, Huizinga E, van der Kuyl M, Boerma A, Ruben J, et al. (1992c). The influence of saliva constituents and properties on enamel remineralization in situ. In: Clinical and biological aspects of dentifrices. Embery G, Rolla G, editors. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, pp. 145-155. Barbakow F, Sener B, Imfeld T, Saltini C (1988). In vitro enamel fluoride retention after brushing with dentifrices

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

V01.9(3)

IN VITRO MODELS

containing 0.025% fluoride. Schweiz Montsschr Zahnmed 98:126-130. Barkvoll P, Rolla G, Lagerlof F (1988). Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate on the deposition of alkali soluble fluoride on enamel in vitro. Caries Res 22:139-144. Barrett-Vespone NA, Featherstone JDB, Shields CP, Faller RV (1993). Fluoride dose response during pH-cycling of deciduous and permanent enamel (abstract). / Dent Res 72:234. Barrett-Vespone NA, Featherstone JDB, Shields CS, Faller RV (1994). In vitro efficacy of a stabilized stannous fluoride toothpaste (abstract). J Dent Res 73:241. Blake-Haskins JC, Mellberg JR, Snyder C (1992). Effect of calcium in model plaque on the anticaries activity of fluoride in vitro. J Dent Res 71:1482-1486. Boonstra WD, ten Bosch JJ, Arends J (1990). Protein and mineral release during in vitro demineralization of bovine dentine. J Biol Buccale 18:43-48. Boonstra WD, de Vries J, ten Bosch JJ, Ogaard B, Arends J (1993). Inhibition of bovine dentine demineralization by a glutardialdehyde pretreatment: an in vitro caries study. Scand J Dent Res 101:72-77. Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM, Hoeks TL, Zwanenburg B (1989). Effect of surface-active compounds on demineralization of dental enamel. Caries Res 23:238-242. Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM, Hoeks TL, Zwanenburg B (1991a). Effect of 2-0 stearoylglycerol-1,3 bisphosphate on in vitro demineralization of dental root surfaces. Caries Res 25:264-267. Borggreven JMPM, Lammers PC, Hoeks T, Zwanenburg B, Driessens FCM (1991b). In vitro remineralization of caries lesions treated with surface active phosphates. Caries Res 25:34-38. Bowman WD, Wietfeldt JR, Agricola FO, Warner R, Morgan NE, Faller RV (1988). The effect of soluble strontium on the remineralization and fluoride uptake by carious enamel from sodium fluoride (abstract). / Dent Res 67:257. Brewer KP, Retief DH, Wallace MC, Bradley EL (1987). Cementum fluoride uptake from topical fluoride agents. Gerodontics 3:212-214. Bruun C, Givskov H (1991). Formation of CaF2 on sound enamel and in caries like enamel lesions under different forms of fluoride applications in vitro. Caries Res 25:96-100. Bruun C, Givskov H (1993). Calcium fluoride formation in enamel from semi- or low-concentrated F agents in vitro. Caries Res 27:96-99. Buskes JAKM, Christoffersen J, Arends J (1985). Lesion formation and lesion remineralization under constant composition conditions. A new technique. Caries Res 19:490-496. Buskes JAKM, de Josselin de Jong E, Christoffersen J, Arends J (1987). Microradiographic study on the demineralization of thick enamel sections: A constant composition study. Caries Res 21:15-21. Carey CM, Vogel GL, Chow LC (1991). Permselectivity of sound and carious human dental enamel as measured by membrane potential. J Dent Res 70:1479-1485.

FOR CARIES

TESTING

187

Chan DCN, Swift EJ Jr, Bishara SE (1990). In vitro evaluation of a fluoride-releasing orthodontic resin. J Dent Res 69:1576-1579. Chan JC, Hill FJ, Newman HN (1991). Uptake of fluoride by sound and artificially carious enamel in vitro following application of topical sodium and amine fluorides. J Dent 19:110-115. Chilton N (1992). Consensus conference on intra-oral models: experimental design and analysis. J Dent Res 71:953. Chow LC (1990). Tooth bound fluoride and dental caries. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):595-600. Chow LC, Takagi S (1989). A quasi-constant composition method for studying the formation of artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res 23:129-134. Chow LC, Takagi S (1991). Deposition of fluoride on tooth surfaces by a two solution mouthrinse in vitro. Caries Res 25:397-401. Chow LC, Takagi S, Shih S (1992). Effect of a two solution fluoride mouthrinse on remineralization of enamel lesions in vitro. J Dent Res 71:437-443. Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Kibalczyc W, Perdok WG (1988). Kinetics of dissolution and growth of calcium fluoride and effects of phosphate. Acta Odontol Scand 46:325-336. Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Ruben J, Arends J (1991). The effect of EHDP concentration on enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res 70:123-126. Chu JS, Fox JL, Higuchi WI (1989). Quantitative study of fluoride transport during subsurface dissolution of dental enamel. J Dent Res 68:32-41. Clarkson BH, Hall DL, Heilman JR, Wefel JS (1986). Effect of proteolytic enzymes on caries lesion formation in vitro. J Oral Pathol 15:423-429. Clarkson BH, Hansen SE, Wefel JS (1988). Effect of topical fluoride treatments on fluoride distribution during in vitro caries-like lesion formation. Caries Res 22:263-268. Clarkson BH, Feagin FF, McCurdy SP, Sheetz JH, Speirs R (1991). Effects of phosphoprotein moieties on the remineralization of human root caries. Caries Res 25:166-173. Collys K, Slop D, Coomans D (1988). The influence of trace elements on demineralization and remineralization properties of tooth enamel in vitro. Trace Elements Med 5:161-169. Collys K, Slop D, De Langhe L, Coomans D (1990). A comparison of the influence of lanthanum and fluoride on de- and remineralization of bovine enamel in vitro. J Dent Res 69:458-462. Collys K, Cleymaet R, Coomans D, Slop D (1991). Acidetched enamel surfaces after 24 hour exposure to calcifying media in vitro and in vivo. J Dent 19:230-235. Collys K, Cleymaet R, Coormans D, Michotte Y, Slop D (1993). Rehardening of surface softened and surface etched enamel in vitro and by intraoral exposure. Caries Res 27:15-20. Corpron RE, More FG, Mount G (1992). Comparison of fluoride profiles by SIMS with mineral density of

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

188

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

subsurface enamel lesions treated intra-orally with a fluoride-releasing device. J Dent Res 71(Spec Iss):828-831. Crall JJ, Bjerga JM (1987). Effects of DCPD/APF application and prolonged exposure to fluoride on caries-like lesion formation in vitro. J Oral Pathol 16:488-491. Creanor SL, Strang R, Stephen KW (1989). Demineralization in acidified gels at different sites on the same enamel surface. Caries Res 23:345-347. Cruz R, Rolla G, Ogaard B (1991). Formation of fluoride on enamel in vitro after exposure to fluoridated mouthrinses. Acta Odontol Scand 49:329-334. Cruz R, Ogaard B, Rolla G (1992). Uptake of KOH soluble and KOH insoluble fluoride in sound human enamel after topical application of a fluoride varnish (Duraphat) or a neutral 2% NaF solution in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 100:154-158. Cruz R, Ng'ang'a PM, Ogaard B, Valderhaug J (1993). Fluoride acquisition on and in fluorotic enamel after topical application in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 101:5-8. Damato FA, Strang R, Stephen KW (1988). Comparison of solution and gel prepared enamel lesions—an in vitro pH cycling study. J Dent Res 67:1122-1125. Damato FA, Strang R, Stephen KW (1990). Effect of fluoride concentration on remineralization of carious enamel: an in vitro pH cycling study. Caries Res 24:174-180. Dawes C (1993). The ebb and flow of the salivary tide. In: Cariology for the nineties. Bowen WH, Tabak LA, editors. Rochester (NY): University of Rochester Press, pp. 123-141. Dawes C, Macpherson LMD (1993). The distribution of saliva and sucrose around the mouth during the use of chewing gum and the implications for the site-specificity of caries and calculus deposition. J Dent Res 72:852-857. de Groot, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM (1986). Irregularity of lesion formation in tooth enamel under several demineralization conditions. Caries Res 20:165-166. DeLong R, Douglas WH (1991). An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans BiomedEng 38:339-345. Derand T, Lodding A, Petersson LG (1989). Effect of topical F- solutions on caries-like lesions in root surfaces. Caries Res 23:135-140. Dijkman AG, Arends J (1988). The role of CaF2 like material in topical fluoridation of enamel in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 46:391-397. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Lodding A, Arends J (1993). Longterm fluoride release of visible light activated composites in vitro\ a correlation with in situ demineralization data. Caries Res 27:117-123. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanso N, Papadogiannis Y (1990). Lesions in vitro associated with F-containing amalgam and a stannous fluoride solution. Oper Dent 15:178-185. Donly KJ, Ruiz M (1992). In vitro demineralization inhibition of enamel caries utilizing an unfilled resin. Clin Prev Dent 14:22-24. Douglas WH, deLong R, Pintado MR, Latta MA (1993). Wear rates of artificial denture teeth opposed by natural dentition. J Clin Dent 4:43-41. Duckworth RM, Morgan SN, Gilbert RJ (1992a). Oral

fluoride measurements for the estimation of the anticaries efficacy of fluoride treatments. J Dent Res 71 (Spec Iss):836-840. Duckworth RM, Morgan SN, Ingram GS, Page DJ (1992b). Oral fluoride reservoirs and their relationship to anticaries efficacy. In: Clinical and biological aspects of dentifrices. Embery G, Rolla G, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91-104. Duckworth RM, Jones Y, Nicholson, Jacobson APM, Chesnut IG (1994). Studies on plaque fluoride after use of F-containing dentifrices. Adv Dent Res 8:202-207. Dunipace AJ, Zhang W, McClure RJ, Stookey GK (1992). An in vitro model for studying human dentin (abstract). / Dent Res 71:200. Duschner H, Uchtmann H (1988a). Effect of sodium fluoride, stannous fluoride, amine hydrofluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate on the formation of precipitates adhering to bovine enamel. Caries Res 22.65-1 \. Duschner H, Uchtmann H (1988b). Degradation of surface enamel and formation of precipitates after topical applications of sodium fluoride solutions in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand 46:365-374. Eronat C, Eronat N, Alpoz AR (1993). Fluoride uptake by enamel in vitro following application of various topical fluoride preparations. J Clin PediatrDent 17:227-230. Ettinger RL, Manderson D, Wefel JS, Jensen ME (1988). An in vitro evaluation of the prevention of caries on overdenture abutments. J Dent Res 67:1338-1341. Exterkate RAM, Damen JJM, ten Cate JM (1993). A singlesection model for de- and remineralization studies. 1. The effects of different Ca/P ratios in remineralization solutions. J Dent Res 72:1599-1603. Faller RV (1992). In vitro fluoride dose response below 1100 ppm F (NaF) (abstract). J Dent Res 71:186. Faller RV, Bowman WD, Wietfeldt JR (1990). Importance of treatment conditions on in vitro fluoride uptake results (abstract). J Dent Res 69:373. Faller RV, Lynn RT, Barrett-Vespone NA, Featherstone JDB (1991). Differences in the caries susceptibility of human enamel (abstract). J Dent Res 70:453. Faller RV, Shaffer JB, Eversole S, Agricola FO (1994). In vitro fluoride uptake from dentifrices containing sodium fluoride and potassium nitrate (abstract). J Dent Res 73:241. Feagin FF, Graves CN (1988). Evaluation of the effects of fluoride in acidified gelatin gel on root surface lesion development in vitro. Caries Res 22:145-149. Featherstone JDB, Zero DT (1992). Laboratory and human studies to elucidate the mechanism of action of fluoride containing dentifrices. In: Clinical and biological aspects of dentifrices. Embery G, Rolla G, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41-50. Featherstone JDB, O'Reilly MM, Shariati M (1986). Enhancement of remineralization in vivo and in vitro. In: Factors affecting de- and remineralization of the teeth. Leach SA, editor. Oxford: IRL Press, pp. 23-34. Featherstone JDB, Shariati M, Brugler S (1988a). Fluoride dose response in an in vitro cycling reminerali-

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL9(3)

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES TESTING

zation/demineralization model (abstract). / Dent Res 67:257. Featherstone JDB, Shariati M, Brugler S, Fu J, White DJ (1988b). Effect of an anticalculus dentifrice on lesion progression under pH cycling conditions in vitro. Caries Res 22:337-341. Featherstone JDB, White DJ, Bowman WD, Shariati M, Stookey GK, LoRe M, et al (1989). Effects of anticalculus dentifrices on caries processes: in vitro and in vivo studies. In: Recent advances in the study of dental calculus, ten Cate JM, editor. Oxford: IRL Press, pp. 197-208. Featherstone JDB, Glena R, Shariati M, Shields CP (1990). Dependence of in vitro de- and remineralization of dental enamel on fluoride concentration. J Dent Res 69:620-625. Featherstone JDB, Shields CS, Barrett-Vespone NA (1992). Effect of tripolyphosphate during in vitro de/remineralization of enamel (abstract). / Dent Res 71:219. Featherstone JDB, Behrman JM, Bell JE (1993). Effect of whole saliva components on enamel demineralization in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4:357-362. Firestone AR, Feagin FF, Heaven TJ, Sheetz J, Denys F (1993). In vitro demineralization by strains of Actinomyces viscosus and Streptococcus sobrinus of sound and demineralized root surfaces. J Dent Res 72:1180-1183. Fox JL, Yu D, Otsuka M, Higuchi WI, Wong J, Powell G (1992). Combined effects of laser irradiation and chemical inhibitors on the dissolution of dental enamel. Caries Res 26:333-339. Franco EM, Cury JA (1994). Effect of Plax prebrushing rinse on enamel fluoride uptake. Am J Dent 7:119-121. Fusayama T (1991). Intratubular crystal deposition and remineralization of carious dentin. J BiolBuccale 19:255-262. Gangler P, Noren JG, Hoyer I, Bjarnason S, Kraft U, Odelius H, et al. (1993). Reactivity of young and old human enamel to demineralization. Scand J Dent Res 101:345-349. Gao XJ, Elliott JC, Anderson P (1991). Scanning and contact microradiographic study of the effect of degree of saturation on the rate of enamel demineralization. / Dent Res 70:1332-1337. Gao XJ, Elliott JC, Anderson P (1993). Scanning microradiographic study of the kinetics of subsurface demineralization in tooth sections under constant composition conditions and small constant-volume conditions. J Dent Res 72:923-930. Gedalia I, Stabholz A, Lavie A, Shapira L, Pisanti S, Segal R (1986). The effect of glycyrrhizin on in vitro fluoride uptake by tooth enamel and subsequent demineralization. ClinPrevDent 8:5-9. Gedalia I, Ionat-Bendat D, Ben-Mosheh S, Shapira L (1991). Tooth enamel softening with a cola type drink and rehardening with hard cheese or stimulated saliva in situ. J OralRehabil 18:501-506. Gilman AG, Rail TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors (1990). Goodman and Gilman's 'The pharmacological basis of therapeutics'. New York: Pergamon Press, p. 5. Goldberg M, Apap M, LeDenmat D (1990). Calcium and

189

phosphate uptake of human dental enamel treated with sodium bicarbonate. J BiolBuccale 18:55-58. Grobler SR, Senekal PJC, Laubscher JA (1990). In vitro demineralization of enamel by orange juice, apple juice, Pepsi cola and diet Pepsi cola. Clin Prev Dent 12:5-9. Grogono A, Mayo JA (1994). Prevention of root caries with dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 7:89-90. Heilman JR, Wefel JS (1994). A cycling root caries model using baking soda dentifrices (abstract). J Dent Res 73:339. Heilman JR, Wefel JS, Pyrz JW, Faller RV (1991). Development of a root caries pH cycling model (abstract). J Dent Res 70:493. Heilman JR, Wefel JS, Faller RV (1992). Root caries model: A comparison of NaF and MFP dentifrices (abstract). J Dent Res 71:201. Hellwig E, Klimek J, Wagner H (1987). The influence of plaque on reaction mechanism of MFP and NaF in vivo. J Dent Res 66:46-49. Hellwig E, Attin T, Metke W (1993). Does the application of a fluoride lacquer modify the de- and remineralization of

initial carious lesions in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 103:150-155. Herkstroter FM, Witjes M, Arends J (1991). Demineralization of human dentine compared to enamel in a pH-cycling apparatus with a constant composition during de- and remineralization periods. Caries Res 25:317-322. Hook M, Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Leonardsen ES, Rassing MR, Rostrup E (1994). Effects of aluminum (III) and fluoride on the demineralization of bovine enamel: a longitudinal microradiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 102:198-201. Iijima Y, Koulourides T (1989). Fluoride incorporation into and retention in remineralized enamel. J Dent Res 68:1289-1292. Iijima Y, Ruben JL, Zuidgeest TGM, Arends J (1993). Fluoride and mineral content in hyper-mineralized coronal bovine dentine in vitro after an acid challenge. Caries Res 27:106-110. Ingram GS, Higham SM, Edgar WM (1992). Uptake of fluoride into enamel and caries reductions: relationships and a pilot experiment in rats. In: Clinical and biological aspects of dentifrices. Embery G, Rolla G, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61-71. Johnsson M, Richardson CF, Sallis JD, Nancollas GH (1991). Adsorption and mineralization effects of citrate and phosphocitrate on hydroxyapatite. Calcif Tissue Int 49:134-137. Joyston-Bechal S, Kidd EAM (1987). The effect of three commercially available saliva substitutes on enamel in vitro. Br Dent J 163:187-190. Kautsky MB, Featherstone JDB (1993). Effect of salivary components on dissolution rates of carbonated apatites. Caries Res 27:373-377. Kim YH, Kim MM, Choi JH, Jeong KL, Suh SS (1994). Effect of dentifrices containing different fluoride

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

190

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

concentrations on remineralization (abstract). J Dent Res 73:241. Kirkham J, Robinson C, Strong M, Shore RC (1994). Effects of frequency and duration of acid exposure on demineralization-remineralization behavior of human enamel in vitro. Caries Res 28:9-13. Kiss J, Banoczy J, Fehervary E, Gintner Z, Albrecht M (1990). Production of cerium apatite in sound and carious dental enamel under in vitro conditions. Acta Morph Hung 38:61-70. Klimek J, Hellwig E, Ahrens G (1982). Fluoride taken up by plaque, by underlying enamel and by clean enamel from three fluoride compounds in vitro. Caries Res 16:156-161. Klont B, ten Cate JM (1990). Release of organic matrix components from bovine incisor roots during in vitro lesion formation. J Dent Res 69:896-900. Klont B, ten Cate JM (1991). Remineralization of bovine incisor root lesions in vitro: the role of collagenous matrix. Caries Res 25:39-45. Koch G, Hakeborg M, Petersson LG (1988). Fluoride uptake on dry versus water-saliva wetted human enamel surfaces in vitro after topical application of a varnish (Duraphat) containing fluoride. SwedDentJ 12:221-225. Koulourides T (1980). Increasing tooth resistance to caries through remineralization. In: Foods, nutrition and dental health. Hefferren JJ, Koehler HM, editors. Chicago: American Dental Association, pp. 193-207. Koutsoukos PG, Amjad Z, Tomson MB, Nancollas GH (1980). Crystallization of calcium phosphates. A constant composition study. J Am Chem Soc 102:1553-1557. Lagerlof F, Ekstrand J, Rolla G (1988). Effect of fluoride addition to ionized calcium in salivary sediment and in saliva. Scand J Dent Res 96:399-404. Lammers PC, Borggreven JM, Driessens FC (1989). The influence of fluoride on in vitro remineralization of bovine

enamel. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 32:199-203. Lammers PC, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM (1990). Influence of fluoride on in vitro remineralization of artificial subsurface lesions determined with a sandwich technique. Caries Res 24:81-85. Lammers PC, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM (1991a). Acid-susceptibility of lesion in bovine enamel after remineralization at different pH values and in the presence of different fluorine concentrations. J Dent Res 70:1486-1490. Lammers PC, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM, Van Dijk JWE (1991b). Influence of fluoride and carbonate on in vitro remineralization of bovine enamel. / Dent Res 70:970-974. Lammers PC, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM, van 't Hof MA (1992). Acid-susceptibility of lesions in bovine enamel after remineralization in the presence of fluoride and/or carbonate. Caries Res 26:1-7. Larsen MJ (1990). Chemical events during tooth dissolution. J Dent Res 69:575-580. Larsen MJ (1991). Effect of a diffusion layer on the nature of enamel demineralization. Caries Res 25:161-165.

Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O (1989). Chemical and structural challenges in remineralization of dental enamel lesions. Scand J Dent Res 97:285-296. Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF (1992). Some notes on the diffusion of acidic and alkaline agents into natural human caries lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 37:411-416. Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF, Jensen SJ (1993). Notes on the dissolution of human dental enamel in dilute acid solutions at high solid/solution ratio. Caries Res 27:87-95. LeGeros RZ (1991). Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Basel: Karger, 210 pp. Lussi A, Jaggi T, Scharer S (1993). The influence of different factors on in vitro enamel erosion. Caries Res 27:387-393. Macpherson LMD, Dawes C (1991). Effects of salivary film velocity on pH changes in artificial plaque containing Streptococcus mitior in an artificial mouth. J Dent Res 70:1230-1234. Macpherson LMD, Dawes C (1994). Distribution of sucrose around the mouth and its clearance after a sucrose mouthrinse or consumption of three different foods. Caries Res 28:150-155. Macpherson LMD, Damato FA, MacFarlane TW, Strang R, Stephen KW (1991). Variation in the susceptibility of enamel to an in vitro demineralization system. Caries Res 25:143-145. Margolis HC (1990). An assessment of recent advances in the study of the chemistry and biochemistry of plaque fluid. J Dent Res 69:1337-1342. Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1990). Physicochemical perspectives on the cariostatic mechanisms of systemic and topical fluorides. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):606-613. Margolis HC, Moreno EC (1992). Composition of pooled plaque fluid from caries-free and caries-positive individuals following sucrose exposure. J Dent Res 71:1776-1784. Matsuo S, Rolla G, Lagerlof F (1990). Effect of fluoride addition on ionized calcium in salivary sediment and in saliva containing various amounts of solid calcium fluoride. Scand J Dent Res 98:482-485. Mellberg JR (1991). Relationship of original mineral loss in caries-like lesions to mineral changes in situ. Caries Res 25:459-461. Mellberg JR (1992). Hard tissue substrates for evaluation of cariogenic and anticariogenic activity in situ. J Dent Res 71(SpecIss):913-919. Mellberg JR, Fletcher R (1990). Effect of a strontium complex on fluoride uptake by artificial caries lesions and sound enamel in vitro. Caries Res 24:93-96. Mellberg JR, Fletcher R, Grote NE (1991). Effect of a steel mesh and human dental plaque on fluoride uptake in vitro. Caries Res 25:402-405. Mellberg JR, Petrou ID, Grote NE (1992). Findings from an in situ thin-section sandwich model for evaluating cariogenic and anticariogenic activity. J Dent Res 71 (Spec Iss):85O-855. Mok Y, Hill FJ, Newman HN (1990). Enamel fluoride uptake affected by site of application: comparing sodium and

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL9(3)

IN VITRO MODELS FOR CARIES

amine fluorides. Caries Res 24:11-17. Naleway C (1985). Laboratory methods of assessing fluoride dentifrices and other topical fluoride agents. In: Clinical uses of fluorides. Wei SH, editor. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, pp. 132-152. Nammour S, Renneboog-Squilbin C, Nyssen-Behets C (1992). Increased resistance to artificial caries-like lesions in dentin treated with CO2 laser. Caries Res 26:170-175. Nancollas GH (1982). Phase transformation during precipitation of of calcium salts. In: Biological mineralization and demineralization. Nancollas GH, editor. Berlin: Springer, pp. 79-99. Nelson DGA, Coote GE, Shariati M, Featherstone JDB (1992). High resolution fluoride profiles of artificial in vitro lesions treated with fluoride dentifrices and mouthrinse during pH cycling conditions. Caries Res 26:254-262. Nieuw Amerongen AV, Oderkerk CH, Driessen AA (1987). Role of mucins from human whole saliva in the protection of tooth enamel against demineralization in vitro. Caries Res 21:297-309. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Ruben J, Arends J (1990). Relative cariostatic effects of KOH-soluble and KOH-insoluble fluoride in situ. J Dent Res 69:1505-1507. Oho T, Morioka T (1990). A possible mechanism of acquired acid resistance of human dental enamel by laser irradiation. Caries Res 24:86-92. Okazaki M, Takahashi J, Kimura H (1986). Crystallinity and solubility behavior of iron-containing hydroxyapatites. J Biomed Mater Res 20:879-886. Oliveby A, Weetman DA, Geddes DAM, Lagerlof F (1990). The effect of salivary sucrose and fluoride on human dental plaque acidogenicity. Arch Oral Biol 35:907-911. Ott KHR (1989). Experimental caries-like lesions under composite restorations. ZWR (Heidelberg) 98:224-231. Page DJ (1991). A study of the effect of fluoride delivered from solution and dentifrices on enamel demineralization. Caries Res 25:251-255. Pearce EIF (1991). Relationship between demineralization events in dental enamel and the pH and mineral content of plaque. Proc Finn Dent Soc 87:527-540. Pearce EIF, Cutress TW, Sissons CH, Coote GE (1992). Supplementation of domestic sugar (sucrose) with fluoride. Effects on experimental dental caries, plaque pH, and fluoride levels in plaque and enamel. N Z Dent J 88:84-88. Petersson LG, Lodding A, Hakeberg M, Koch G (1989). Fluorine profiles in human enamel after in vitro treatment with dentifrices of different compositions and acidities. SwedDent 7 13:177-183. Petzold C, Kolesnik AG, Petzold G (1990). Demineralization behavior, enamel permeability and the morphological characteristics in relationship to the stage of eruption of the permanent teeth. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl 78:211-216. Proskin H (1992). Statistical considerations related to intraoral studies. J Dent Res 71:901-904.

TESTING

191

Purton DG, Rodda JC (1988). Artificial caries around restorations in roots. J Dent Res 67:817-821. Raj PA, Johnsson M, Levine MJ, Nancollas GH (1992). Salivary statherin. Dependence on sequence, charge, hydrogen bonding potency, and helical conformation for adsorption to hydroxyapatite and inhibition of mineralization. J Biol Chem 267:5968-5976. Raven SJ, Schafer R, Duckworth RM, Gilbert RJ, Parr TA (1991). Comparison between evaluation methods for the anticaries efficacy of monofluorophosphate containing dentifrices. Caries Res 25:130-137. Reddy VV, Indushekar KR (1992). In vitro evaluation of NaF and APF gel application on surface microhardness of enamel in children of low, optimum and high fluoride areas. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 10:1-6. Redelberger T, Klinger HG, Wiedemann W (1991). Effect of pore topology on the remineralization rate of surfacesoftened enamel and synthetic hydroxyapatite: an experimental comparison and mathematical model. Caries Res 25:88-95. Rentsch H, Merte K, Zschau HE, Plier F, Otto G, Vogi J (1990). Fluoride and mineral redeposition in outermost layers of bovine enamel during surface softening. Caries Res 24:97-100. Richardson CF, Johnsson M, Raj PA, Levine MJ, Nancollas GH (1993). The influence of histatin-5 fragments on the mineralization of hydroxyapatite. Arch Oral Biol 38:997-1002. Robinson C, Kirkham J, Baverstock AC, Shore RC (1992). A flexible and rapid pH cycling procedure for investigations into the remineralization and demineralization behavior of human enamel. Caries Res 26:14-17. Rolla G (1988). On the role of calcium fluoride in the cariostatic mechanism of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 46:341-345. Rykke M, Sonju T, Skoorland K, Rolla G (1989). Protein adsorption to hydroxyapatitie and to calcium fluoride in vitro and amino acid analyses of pellicle formed on normal enamel and on calcium-fluoride-covered enamel in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 47:245-251. Sakaguchi RL, Cross M, Douglas WH (1992). A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. Dent Mater 8:131-136. Samarawickrama DYD, Speirs RL (1993). Fluoride concentrations in dentine and acid-induced demineralization in vitro. Fluoride Q Rep (New Zealand) 26:115-124. Saxegaard E (1988). Alkali solubility of calcium fluoride preexposed to inorganic orthophosphate at pH 6.8. Acta Odontol Scand 46:361-363. Saxegaard E, Rolla G (1988). Fluoride acquisition on and in human enamel during topical application in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 96:523-535. Saxegaard E, Rolla G (1989). Kinetics of acquisition and loss of calcium fluoride by enamel in vivo. Caries Res 23:406-411. Saxegaard E, Lagerlof F, Rolla G (1988). Dissolution of calcium fluoride in human saliva. Acta Odontol Scand 46:355-359.

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

192

ADV DENT RES NOVEMBER 1995

WHITE

Schafer F, Raven SJ, Parr TA (1992). The effect of lesion characteristic on remineralization and model sensitivity. J Dent Res 71(Spec Iss):811-813. Schemehorn BR, Farnham RL, Wood GD (1992). Fluoride uptake and remineralization in human and bovine enamel (abstract). / Dent Res 11:186. Schemehorn B, Roberts JA, Wood GD (1994). An in vitro remin/demin model showing a fluoride dose response (abstract). J Dent Res 73:241. Seppa L (1988). Effects of a sodium fluoride solution and a varnish with different fluoride concentrations on enamel remineralization in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 96:304-309. Seppa L, Forss H (1991). Resistance of occlusal fissures to demineralization after loss of glass ionomer cements in vitro. PediatrDent 13:39-42. Shaffer JB, Best JM, DePrato DW, Faller RV, MacKay BJ (1994). Animal caries efficacy of dentifrices containing sodium fluoride + potassium nitrate (abstract). J Dent Res 73:241. Shern RJ, Chow LC, Schreiber C, Brunelle JA, Groh RK (1987). Effects of flushings with an acidic calcium phosphate solution on fluoride binding and caries in rat teeth. Caries Res 21:435-444. Sidi AD, Wilson RF (1991). Fluoride, calcium and inorganic phosphorus concentrations in approximal plaque collected from young adults 1 and 24 hour after toothbrushing with fluoride toothpastes. Caries Res 25:330-334. Sieck B, Takagi S, Chow LC (1990). Assessment of looselybound and firmly bound fluoride uptake by tooth enamel from topically applied fluoride treatments. / Dent Res 69:1261-1265. Silverstone LM (1983). Remineralization and enamel caries: significance of fluoride and effect on crystal diameters. In: Remineralization and demineralization of the teeth. Leach SA, Edgar M, editors. Oxford: IRL Press, pp. 185-205. Simonsson T, Hvid EB, Rundegren J, Edwardsson S (1991). Effect of delmopinol on in vitro dental plaque formation, bacterial acid production and the number of microorganisms in human saliva. Oral Microbiol Immunol 6:305-309. Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Hoffman MP, Wakefield JS (1991). A multistation dental plaque microcosm (artificial mouth) for the study of plaque growth, metabolism, pH and mineralization. J Dent Res 70:1409-1416. Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Faulds G, Wong L (1992). pH responses to sucrose and the formation of pH gradients in thick 'artificial mouth' microcosm plaques. Arch Oral Biol 37:913-922. Skartveit L, Gjerdet NR, Selvig KA (1991). Release of fluoride and metal ions from root surfaces after topical application of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand 49:127-131. Sorvari R, Meurman JH, Alakuijala P, Frank RM (1994a). Effect of a fluoride varnish and solution on enamel erosion in vitro. Caries Res 28:227-232. Sorvari R, Spets-Happonen S, Luoma H (1994b). Efficacy of chlorhexidine solution with fluoride varnishing in preventing enamel softening by Streptococcus mutans in

an artificial mouth. Scand J Dent Res 102:206-209. Souto M, Donly KJ (1994). Caries inhibition of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 7:122-124. Spets-Happonen S, Luoma H, Seppa L, Raisanen J (1993). The effect of different strontium concentrations on the efficacy of chlorhexidine-fluoride-strontium gel in preventing enamel softening in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 38:107-112. Stabholz A, Markitziu A, Kogan K, Deutsch D, Gedalia I (1987). Demineralization and remineralization of in vitro fluoridated human root surfaces. Clin Prev Dent 9:23-27. Stephen KW, Damato FA, Strang R (1992). An in situ enamel section model for assessment of enamel re/demineralization potential. / Dent Res 71 (Spec Iss):856-859. Strang R, Damato FA, Creanor SL, Stephen KW (1987). The effect of baseline lesion mineral loss on in situ remineralization. J Dent Res 66:1644-1646. Strang R, Damato FA, Stephen KW (1988). Comparison of in vitro demineralization of enamel sections and slabs. Caries Res 22:348-349. Tadmor E, Poitou P, Gedalia I (1989). In vitro acid decalcification of human surface enamel pre-treated with toothpaste slurries. / Oral Rehabil 16:613-616. Tagomori S, Morioka T (1989). Combined effects of laser and fluoride on acid resistance of human dental enamel. Caries Res 23:225-231. Takagi S, Chow LC, Sieck BA (1992). Deposition of loosely bound and firmly bound fluorides on tooth enamel by an acidic gel containing fluorosilicate and monocalcium phosphate monohydrate. Caries Res 26:321-327. Tanaka M, Moreno EC, Margolis HC (1993). Effect of fluoride incorporation into human dental enamel on its demineralization in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 38:863-869. Temin SC, Csuros Z, Mellberg JR (1989). Fluoride uptake from a composite restorative by enamel. Dent Mater 5:64-65. ten Cate JM (1986). Use of the single section technique in caries research. Caries Res 20:525-528. ten Cate JM (1990). In vitro studies on the effects of fluoride on de- and remineralization. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):614-619. ten Cate JM (1992). Mechanistic interactions of dentifrices with de- and remineralization. In: Clinical and biological aspects of dentifrices. Embery G, Rolla G, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51-60. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PPE (1982). Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res 16:201-210. Tomson MB, Nancollas GH (1978). Mineralization kinetics: a constant composition approach. Science 200:1059-1060. Tsanidis V, Koulourides T (1992). An in vitro model for assessment of fluoride uptake from glass-ionomer cements by dentin and effects on acid resistance. J Dent Res 71:7-12. Tsuda H, Arends J (1993a). Detection and quantification of calcium fluoride using microraman spectroscopy. Caries Res 27:249-257. Tsuda H, Arends J (1993b). Combined raman and SEM study on CaF2 formed on/in enamel by APF treatments. Caries

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.

VOL.9(S)

IN VITRO MODELS

Res 27:445-454. Tveit AB, Klinge B, T0tdal B, Selvig K (1988). Long-term retention of TiF 4 and SnF 2 after topical application to dentin in dogs. Scand J Dent Res 96:536-540. van der Linden AHIM, Booij M, ten Bosch JJ, Arends J (1989). Albumin interaction with caries-like lesions in bovine enamel. Caries Res 23:393-398. van Dorp CS, ten Cate JM (1992). Preventive measures and caries progression: An in vitro study on fissures and smooth surfaces of human molars. J Dent Child 59:257-262. van Dorp CS, Exterkate RAM, ten Cate JM (1988). The effect of dental probing on subsequent enamel demineralization. J Dent Child 55:343-347. van Loveren C, Spetz LM, Buijs JF, ten Cate JM, Eisenberg AD (1991). In vitro demineralization of enamel by F sensitive and F resistant mutans streptococci in the presence of 0, 0.05, or 0.5 mmol/L NaF. J Dent Res 70:1491-1496. Viazis AD (1989). Enamel wear from ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Orthod-Epitheorese 1:167-174. Viazis AD, DeLong R, Bevis RR, Rudney JD, Pintado MR (1990). Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 98:103-109. Vogel GL, Carey CM, Chow LC, Gregory TM, Brown WE (1988). Microanalysis of mineral saturation within enamel during lactic acid demineralization. J Dent Res 67:1172-1180. Wahab FK, Shellis RP, Elderton RJ (1993). Effects of low fluoride concentrations on formation of caries-like lesions in human enamel in a sequential-transfer bacterial system. Arch Oral Biol 38:985-995. Weatherell JA, Strong M, Robinson C, Ralph JP (1986). Migration patterns of substances in the mouth. In: Factors relating to demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Leach SA, editor. Oxford: IRL Press, pp. 81-90. Wefel JS, Jensen ME (1992). An intra-oral single-section demineralization/remineralization model. / Dent Res 71(SpecIss):860-863. White DJ (1987a). Use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesion preparation. Caries Res 21:228-242. White DJ (1987b). Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. I. Effects on early carious lesions: Fluoride uptake, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 21:126-140. White DJ (1988). Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with

FOR CARIES

TESTING

193

artificial caries. II. Effects on subsurface lesions: F uptake, F distribution, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 22:27-36. White DJ (1992). The comparative sensitivity of intra-oral, in vitro, and animal models in the 'profile' evaluation of topical fluorides. J Dent Res 71 (Spec Iss):884-894. White DJ, Featherstone JDB (1987). A longitudinal microhardness analysis of fluoride dentifrice effects on lesion progression in vitro. Caries Res 21:502-512. White DJ, Nancollas GH (1990). Physical and chemical considerations of the role of firmly and loosely bound fluoride on caries prevention. J Dent Res 69(Spec Iss):587-594. White DJ, Bowman WD, Faller RV, Mobley MJ, Wolfgang RA, Yesinowski JP (1988a). 19F MAS NMR and solution chemical characterization of the reactions of fluoride with hydroxyapatite and powdered enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 46:375-389. White DJ, Chen WC, Nancollas GH (1988b). Kinetic and physical aspects of enamel remineralization—a constant composition study. Caries Res 22:11-19. White DJ, Nelson DGA, Faller RV (1994). Mode of action of fluoride: application of new techniques and test methods to the examination of the mechanism of action of topical fluoride. Adv Dent Res 8:166-174. Wikiel K, Burke EM, Perich JW, Reynolds EC, Nancollas GH (1994). Hydroxyapatite mineralization and demineralization in the presence of synthetic phosphorylated peptides. Arch Oral Biol 39:715-721. Williams DR, Wu L (1993). Chemical speciation of saliva containing remineralization solutions and their predicted effectiveness for subsurface lesion remineralization. Chem Speciat Bioavailabil 5:107-117. Wucherpfennig G, Hoyer I, Gangler P (1990). Mikromorphologie der superfiziellen remineralization des Zahnschmelzes. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd 78:223-229. Yu H, Xu LX, Oho T, Morioki T (1993). The effect of a tannin-fluoride mixture on human dental enamel. Caries Res 21A61-16S. Yue S, Zhu L, Mao Y, Chen X (1990). Effects of proteolytic enzymes on demineralization of enamel. Hua Hsi I Ko Ta Hsueh Hsueh Pao 21:155-158. Zameck RL, Tinanoff N (1987). Effects of NaF and SnF2 on growth, acid and glucan production of several oral streptococci. Arch Oral Biol 32:807-810.

Downloaded from adr.sagepub.com by guest on July 14, 2011 For personal use only. No other uses without permission.