Advances in Environmental Biology

3 downloads 16 Views 190KB Size Report
Received 15 April 2014 ... leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in the World and the leading cause of ... 2014 AENSI Publisher All rights reserved.
Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(12) June 2014, Pages: 451-454

AENSI Journals

Advances in Environmental Biology ISSN-1995-0756

EISSN-1998-1066

Journal home page: http://www.aensiweb.com/aeb.html

Cancer stem cells and inflammation 1

Shiva Solahaye Kahnamouii, 2Farzaneh Pakdel, 3Firouz Pouralibaba, 4Atabak Kashefimehr

1

Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Cardiovascular Research Center, and Drug applied research center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, IRAN 2,3 Department of Oral Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, IRAN 4 Department of Pediatrics, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, IRAN ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 15 April 2014 Received in revised form 22 July 2014 Accepted 18 Ague 2014 Available online 15 Sep 2014 Key words: Cancer, stem cell, Cytokines

ABSTRACT Cancer stem cells are cancer cells that possess characteristics associated with normal stem cells, specifically the ability to give rise to all cell types found in a particular cancer sample. It is often considered to be associated with chemo- resistance and radioresistance that lead to the failure of traditional therapy. epithelial cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in the World and the leading cause of gynecologic cancer deaths. The major limiting factor in the treatment of cancer is recurrence and chemo resistance. Individuals who succumb to advanced stage cancer inevitably become refractory to chemotherapy, resulting in disease progression and death. The source of recurrence and lack of response to chemotherapy is unknown. The focus of this review is to evaluate the question of recurrence and chemo resistance based on the concept of the cancer stem cells and inflammation.

© 2014 AENSI Publisher All rights reserved. To Cite This Article: To Cite This Article: Shiva Solahaye Kahnamouii, Farzaneh Pakdel, Firouz Pouralibaba, Atabak Kashefimehr, Cancer stem cells and inflammation. Adv. Environ. Biol., 9(12), 451-454, 2014

INTRODUCTION Cancer stem cells are cancer cells that possess characteristics associated with normal stem cells, specifically the ability to give rise to all cell types found in a particular cancer sample. It is often considered to be associated with chemo- resistance and radio-resistance that lead to the failure of traditional therapy [1]. There show to be several sources from which cancer stem cells may happen. They may happen from normal ASCs (adipose-derived stromal cells), from more restricted progenitor cells or even from differentiated cells [2]. Normal stem cells are more likely to be the targets of mutants and leading to the formation of CSCs for they already possess active self-renewal pathways. It is also possible for progenitors and other differentiated cells to give rise to CSCs, though they would have to acquire more genetic mutations, especially in self-renewal genes[3-5]. Cancer stem cells can represent approximately 0.1–10% of all tumor cells and their antigens are typically expressed at lower levels than the ‘established’ tumor-associated antigens. Unlike these, the discovery of CSC antigens was not based on their over-expression but due to their presence on populations of cells which had stem cell-like properties. However, it has been hypotheses that CSCs arising from normal stem cells are more aggressive than those from progenitor cells, though this remains to be proven [6]. CSC heterogeneity CSCs recently reported in mainly human tumors which can identified with using cell surface markers, such as CD44 and CD133 with flowcytometry, and functional approaches, including SP analysis [7-10], The tumor cell subset that can set off tumor development at cell numbers with low percentage is enriched in CSCs. these cell surface markers have proved useful for isolation of subsets enriched for CSC. A most important surface markers Corresponding Author: Firouz Pouralibaba, Department of Oral Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, IRAN, E-mail: [email protected]

Firouz Pouralibaba et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(12) June 2014, Pages: 451-454

are CD133, CD44, CD24, EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule, also known as epithelial specific antigen, ESA).[11-15]CD133 is a transmembrane domain glycoprotein expressed on CD34+ stem and progenitor cells, in fetal neural stem cells. CD133 was also found in epithelial cells and in somatic stem cells from neural tissues, prostate,and kidney Interestingly,human CD133+ cells from granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral bloodwere able to differentiate into endothelial cells, when cultured in pro-endothelial lineage condition. In brain tumors, CD133+ cells revealed properties of cancer stem cells,and in the intestine, this marker identified stem cells that were susceptible to neoplastic transformation[16].CD44 has pleiotropic roles in cell signaling, migration and homing. CD44 is considered a predictive marker for local recurrence after radiotherapy in patients with larynx cancer. High levels of CD44,aldehyde dehydrogenase and phosphorylated Stat3 are found in high-grade HNSCC, and are indicative of poor prognosis. Also, a higher frequency of CD44+ cells was observed in HNSCC that recurred than in human tumors without recurrence. Collectively, these studies suggest a direct correlation between CD44 expression, cancer stem cells, and the aggressiveness of head and neck tumors[17-20]. CD24 has co-stimulatory role in B and T cells. ALDH has role in conversion of retinol to retinoic acid, which is essential for survival. Breast CSCs (BCSCs) are the first CSCs to be reported in solid tumors and are among the most intensely studied ALDH1 is the prototypic member of the ALDH family and is highly expressed in human hematopoietic progenitors or hematopoietic stem cells TLR Expression and Function in Cancer TLR activation by PAMPs and DAMPs has a critical role in innate and adaptive immunity. In addition to their expression on immune cells, TLRs are also expressed on the epithelial cell lining, gastrointestinal tract, and female reproductive tract, alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells in the lung, normal keratinocytes in skin, as well as vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells in the cardiovascular system. TLR expression on the epithelial cell lining of an organ provides the first line of defense against pathogens and neoplastic lesions and is also important in the regulation of epithelial proliferative and apoptotic response (21). TLR 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 10 are cell surface proteins and TLR 1, 2, and 6 respond to various lipoproteins and glycolipids of bacterial origin. TLR10 is the only TLR without a known agonist but does share the greatest homology with TLRs 1 and 6 and has been shown to colocalize with TLR2 in phagosomes (10, 11). TLR5 responds to bacterial flagella, whereas TL4 responds to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as well as DAMPs including S100A, HMGB1, and HSP released from apoptotic cells. Saturated fatty acids but not unsaturated fatty acids also activate TLR4. In recent years, TLR expression in tumor tissue has been reported, which may provide an important mechanism in the recruitment of inappropriate immune enhancement and dysfunctional immunity leading to antitumor immune tolerance (19). One of the major challenges in understanding the connection between inflammation and cancer is to identify the triggering events that lead to the inflammatory response, the source and target of the inflammatory signals, and how this can contribute to tumor progression. Cancer Stem cells and TLRs Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of transmembrane proteins, which recognize and respond to conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are expressed by microorganisms. To date, ten human TLRs and their specific ligands have been identified. Although TLRs individually respond to limited ligands, collectively as a family, TLRs respond to a wide range of PAMPs associated with bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites. TLR-2 (with -1 or -6), -4, -5 and -9 recognize mainly bacterial products, while TLR-3 and -8 detect viral components. In addition, some TLRs, such as TLR-2, and -4 respond to endogenous “stress” proteins, such as heat shock protein (Hsp 60), hyaluronan and fibrinogen.22,23It should be noted that most of these endogenous ligands are released as part of cellular debris following cell death.24 Most TLRs signal through a common pathway since they possess a common intracellular domain known as the Toll/IL-1R homology region (TIR).25 Following TLR ligation, the TIR recruits the adopter protein MyD88, which then leads to downstream activation of the NFκB and MAP kinase signaling pathways, resulting in an inflammatory response, which is characterized by the production of cytokines and chemokines.26 TLRs are widely expressed by the cells of the immune system, and initiate an inflammatory process in response to microbial products or stress factors.27-29 In addition, TLRs have been described in non-immune cells, such as mucosal epithelium and

Firouz Pouralibaba et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(12) June 2014, Pages: 451-454

trophoblast cells.(21-25) Similar to immune cells, the ligation of TLRs in non-immune cells results in the expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.[26]

REFERENCES [1] Li X, Jiang S, Tapping RI. Toll-like receptor signaling in cell proliferation and survival. Cytokine 2010;49:1–9. [2] Sato Y, Goto Y, Narita N, Hoon DS. Cancer cells expressing Toll-like receptors and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron 2009;2(Suppl 1):205–14. [3] Ve T,GayNJ,Mansell A, KobeB, Kellie S. Adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling and their potential as therapeutic targets. Curr Drug Targets 2012;13:1360–74. [4] Kong Y, Le Y. Toll-like receptors in inflammation of the central nervous system. Int Immunopharmacol 2011;11:1407–14. [5] Dasu MR, Ramirez S, Isseroff RR. Toll-like receptors and diabetes: a therapeutic perspective. Clin Sci (Lond) 2012;122:203–14. [6] Huang B, Zhao J, Li H, He KL, Chen Y, Chen SH, et al. Toll-like receptors on tumor cells facilitate evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Res 2005;65:5009–14. [7] Fukata M, Chen A, Vamadevan AS, Cohen J, Breglio K, Krishnareddy S, et al. Toll-like receptor-4 promotes the development of colitis-associated colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology 2007;133: 1869–81. [8] McCarthy EF. The toxins ofWilliamB. Coley and the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Iowa Orthop J 2006;26:154–8. [9] Thotathil Z, Jameson MB. Early experience with novel immunomodu-lators for cancer treatment. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007;16:1391–403. [10] Guan Y, Ranoa DR, Jiang S, Mutha SK, Li X, Baudry J, et al. Human TLRs 10 and 1 share common mechanisms of innate immune sensing but not signaling. J Immunol 2010;184:5094–103. [11] Hasan U, Chaffois C, Gaillard C, Saulnier V,Merck E, Tancredi S, et al. Human TLR10 is a functional receptor, expressed by B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which activates gene transcription through MyD88. J Immunol 2005;174:2942–50. [12] Chaturvedi A, Pierce SK. How location governs toll-like receptor signaling. Traffic 2009;10:621–8. [13] Smits EL, Ponsaerts P, Berneman ZN, Van Tendeloo VF. The use of TLR7 and TLR8 ligands for the enhancement of cancer immunotherapy. Oncologist 2008;13:859–75. [14] Liu L, Botos I, Wang Y, Leonard JN, Shiloach J, Segal DM, et al. Structural basis of toll-like receptor 3 signaling with double-stranded RNA. Science 2008;320:379–81. [15] BartonGM,MedzhitovR. Toll-like receptors and their ligands.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002;270:81– 92. [16] Akira S, Sato S. Toll-like receptors and their signaling mechanisms. Scand J Infect Dis 2003;35:555–62. [17] O'Neill LA, Bowie AG. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7: 353–64.

Firouz Pouralibaba et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(12) June 2014, Pages: 451-454

[18] Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 2004;5:987–95. [19] Basith S, Manavalan B, Yoo TH, Kim SG, Choi S. Roles of toll-like receptors in cancer: a double-edged sword for defense and offense. Arch Pharm Res 2012;35:1297–316. [20] Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436–44. [21] Tewari R, Choudhury SR, Ghosh S, Mehta VS, Sen E. Involvement of TNFalpha-induced TLR4-NFkappaB and TLR4-HIF-1alpha feed-for-ward loops in the regulation of inflammatory responses in glioma. JMolMed (Berl) 2012;90:67–80. [22] Park HD, Lee Y, Oh YK, Jung JG, Park YW, Myung K, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor promotes metastasis by regulating TLR/CXCR4 activation. Oncogene 2011;30:201–11. [23] Sheyhidin I, Nabi G, Hasim A, Zhang RP, Ainiwaer J, Ma H, et al. Overexpression of TLR3, TLR4, TLR7 and TLR9 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:3745–51. [24] Gonzalez-Reyes S, Marin L, Gonzalez L, Gonzalez LO, del Casar JM, LamelasML, et al.Study of TLR3, TLR4 and TLR9 in breast carcinomas and their association with metastasis. BMC Cancer 2010;10:665. [25] Grimm M, Kim M, Rosenwald A, Heemann U, Germer CT, Waaga- Gasser AM, et al. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7 and TLR8 expression on CD133þ cells in colorectal cancer points to a specific role for inflammationinduced TLRs in tumourigenesis and tumour progression. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2849–57. [26] Wang EL, Qian ZR, NakasonoM, Tanahashi T, Yoshimoto K, Bando Y,et al. High expression of Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation factor 88 signals correlateswith poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer 2010;102:908–15. [27] Zhang JJ, Wu HS, Wang L, Tian Y, Zhang JH, Wu HL. Expression and significance of TLR4 and HIF1alpha in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:2881–8. [28] Dvorak HF. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med 1986;315: 1650–9. [29] Chen GG, Lee JF, Chan UP, Xu H, Ip PC, LauWY. Increased apoptosis in infiltrating mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer: a mechanism for tumor escape. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:686–91. [30] Wang Q, Takei Y, Kobayashi O, Osada T, Watanabe S. Cyclooxygenase 2 modulates killing of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by colon cancer cells. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2009;45:163–70. [31] Glynn SA, Boersma BJ, Dorsey TH, YiM, Yfantis HG, Ridnour LA, et al. Increased NOS2 predicts poor survival in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. J Clin Invest 2010;120:3843–54. [32] Glynn SA, Prueitt RL, Ridnour LA, Boersma BJ, Dorsey TM, Wink DA, et al. COX-2 activation is associated with Akt phosphorylation and poor survival in ER-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2010;10:626. [33] Harmey JH, Bucana CD, LuW, Byrne AM,McDonnell S, Lynch C, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced metastatic growth is associated with increased angiogenesis, vascular permeability and tumor cell invasion. Int J Cancer 2002;101:415–22. [34] Murdoch C, Giannoudis A, Lewis CE. Mechanisms regulating the recruitment of macrophages into hypoxic areas of tumors and other ischemic tissues. Blood 2004;104:2224–34. [35] Fabbri M, Paone A, Calore F, Galli R, Gaudio E, Santhanam R, et al.MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:E2110–6.

Firouz Pouralibaba et al, 2014 Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(12) June 2014, Pages: 451-454