Advances in Nursing Science

6 downloads 0 Views 450KB Size Report
economy. This for-profit orientation shifts the system from an emphasis on human ... neoliberalism) or the “trickle-down economics” as Reagan called it, started ...
Advances in Nursing Science Neoliberalism and Health --Manuscript Draft-Manuscript Number: Full Title:

Neoliberalism and Health

Article Type:

Editorial

Section/Category:

38:1 - Patterns of Health Behavior (closed)

Corresponding Author:

Michele J. Eliason, Ph.D. San Francisco State University San Francisco, CA UNITED STATES

Corresponding Author Secondary Information: Corresponding Author's Institution:

San Francisco State University

Corresponding Author's Secondary Institution: First Author:

Michele J. Eliason, Ph.D.

First Author Secondary Information: Order of Authors:

Michele J. Eliason, Ph.D.

Order of Authors Secondary Information:

Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation

LWW Copyright Transfer and Disclosure Form Click here to download LWW Copyright Transfer and Disclosure Form: copyrightTransfer.pdf

Manuscript (ONLY Manuscript Text Pages, References and Figure Legends)

Guest Editorial for ANS Issue on Patterns of Health Behavior Neoliberalism and Health Mickey Eliason In the past few years, I have thought deeply about the effects of neoliberalism on health practices in the United States, particularly on the ways that it shifts attention away from social determinants of health and puts them squarely on individual behavior. Neoliberalism is a confusing term, because it has nothing to do with political liberal views, and instead, is associated with conservative political viewpoints. Neoliberalism is the primary ideology driving our government, economy, and healthcare delivery today. It involves an erosion of government regulation and funding of health and human services and replaces it with a private market economy. This for-profit orientation shifts the system from an emphasis on human rights and quality to one of cost-savings and efficiency, and makes all variety of health services into goods for sale. For readers who are not familiar with the history of neoliberalism, it stems from liberalism based on Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations in the mid 1770s and was the dominant system of Europe and much of the industrialized world for 200 years. In the U.S., it was replaced briefly in the early 1900s with a more humane system of safety nets and efforts to help the most disenfranchised and marginalized with employment, welfare, Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security, Headstart, and many other programs. Beginning in the 1970s and jump-started in the 1980s by Ronald Reagan’s policies, this new liberalism (now called neoliberalism) or the “trickle-down economics” as Reagan called it, started dismantling our healthcare system as we know it (and education, business, and the media as well). In this system, economic growth is valued over any other principles, like democracy, social justice, compassion, or sustainability. What Reagan and now contemporary proponents of neoliberalism have

1

accomplished is a shift in government expenditures. In 1980, 38% of federal expenditures went to individuals, 41% to the military, and 21% to private enterprise. By 2007, money to individuals decreased to 32% and increased to the military (45%) and private enterprise (23%). This was prior to bail-outs of the auto industry and banks approved by congress in recent years. In medicine, funds have shifted to public and private investments in biomedical, biotech, and pharmaceutical solutions to disease, and away from less profitable prevention, caring, or healing activities (Navarro, 2009). Neoliberalism is based on three principles: individualism, privatization, and decentralization (McGregor, 2001). I’d like to focus on individualism here, and the effects it has had on health research and practice. An overemphasis on the individual capitalizes on our evolutionary drive to survive when put in competitive, threatening situations. Think of all the reality shows in the past ten years that set up individuals against each other to win some prize…is their behavior ethical and exemplary? When health is recast as a commodity or a good to be purchased, we are pitted against each other to obtain the scarce resources. Individuals are valued over the family or the community, and ethics get lost. A neoliberal approach focuses on equal access to health care services, not fairness. In this vein, welfare is considered inappropriate because not everyone has equal access to it. When we focus so predominantly on individual accountability and responsibility for one’s own health, it is easy to blame the most marginalized segments of society for their own health problems. Homeless individuals, teen parents, those addicted to drugs, the obese, become those who did not take responsibility for their health, whether they shook the salt shaker too many times, ate those Mickey D’s fries, did not master the English language, or chose not to exercise every day. The social structural barriers and environmental circumstances that pushed them to those individual behaviors are ignored and lost

2

in the efforts to “empower” the disempowered to take responsibility for their health. The solution to any health problem is to buy some product or service: drugs to regulate cholesterol, weight watchers to lose weight or worse yet, bariatric surgeries to remove the fat, treadmills that become clothes hangers in the basement after a week of use, nicotine patches to bolster one’s “will power.” Barbara Ehrenreich, in Bright-Sided, described her personal experience with the new individualism as it has manifest in many components of healthcare as “positive thinking” when she was treated for breast cancer. She noted: “Breast cancer, I can now report, did not make me prettier or stronger, more feminine or spiritual. What it gave me, if you want to call this a “gift,” was a very personal, agonizing encounter with an ideological force in American culture that I had not been aware of before—one that encourages us to deny reality, submit cheerfully to misfortune, and blame only ourselves for our fate.” Ehrenreich found a system that focused on breast cancer survivors banding together to “empower” themselves through positive thinking and pink ribbons, rather than challenging the environmental toxins in our food, water, medications, and air that might be responsible for increasing rates of cancer. In another example, Braslow (2013) critiqued the mental health recovery movement as another example of how neoliberalism has affected healthcare. Based on the idea that medicallybased mental health care fosters dependency and hopelessness, the recovery movement makes the individual responsible for his/her own recovery as an independent, autonomous being, and government support is increasingly cut. This system of peer recovery networks, like George

3

Bush’s famous “1000 Points of Light” campaign, relies on mostly unpaid volunteers to do the work. This message of dependency is often repeated in the neoliberal discourses. One of the most famous historically was Reagan’s address in 1987 about his rationale for cutting welfare, “It’s now common knowledge that our welfare system has itself become a poverty trap—a creator and reinforce of dependency.” Welfare has certainly not provided enough resources to raise the majority of its recipients out of poverty it’s true, but to consider it a cause of poverty is nonsensical. What the reduction in welfare has done is to create a class of potential workers who are desperate for a job, and will take the lowest paying work in unsafe working conditions without complaint, because they have no other choices. The resistance to raising the minimum wage is a ploy to maintain this lower class of workers to increase the profit margins of big business whose CEOs and higher management folks have been getting richer and richer since the 1980s. In relation to the practice of nursing, Krol and Lavoie (2014) described a “neoliberal tide” threatening to flood the discipline of nursing, washing away a caring orientation and leaving behind a barren, ethics-free consumer health philosophy. Some of the developments that show the influence of neoliberalism are the increased emphasis on evidence-based practice, which emphasizes cost-effectiveness over innovation; increase in competition-based programs, such as fitness programs that show data from all group members or group weigh-ins that are meant to increase individual accountability but actually contribute to shame and guilt; and focus on technology rather than humanizing, personal care. I don’t want to imply that we not address the individual at all, or that some degree of individual autonomy and responsibility is not appropriate. I’m not saying that technology or

4

evidence-based practice is bad. The problem arises when our solutions are not balanced between the individual and the community or greater good, when we don’t consider the social determinants of health that drive individual behaviors. When equal access replaces social justice, and the already marginalized in society are further denied humane services, we are violating nursing ethics. In many aspects of nursing education and practice, it is easier to focus solely or primarily on the individual. Upstream influences on health are harder to change, more difficult to measure, and are in the policy or activist arenas where many nurses do not feel comfortable. Structural barriers to healthcare often stem from uncomfortable forces of oppression like racism, sexism, classism, and heterosexism, concepts we are not trained to address in our healthcare training programs. But it is our ethical obligation to address the whole person, and that person is imbedded in families, neighborhoods, and societies. All of those levels contain factors that influence an individual’s behavior, whether that behavior is smoking, nutritional patterns, physical activity, or meditating. Unless we address cultural norms, oppression, zoning laws, food production systems, urban planning, neighborhood safety, food deserts, pollution, and a host of other factors, our individual level interventions will not be successful in the long run. Until we question why basic human services have become profitbased industries, health disparities will continue. I urge all authors to consider the larger context when interpreting results of their studies, and at least consider how their interventions might be influenced by social determinants of health.

References Braslow, J. T. (2013). The manufacture of recovery. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 781-809.

5

Ehrenreich, B. (2009). Bright-sided. How positive thinking is undermining America. NY: Metropolitan Books.

Krol, P.J. & Lavoie, M. (2014). Beyond nursing nihilism, a Nietzschean transvaluation of neoliberal values, Nursing Philosophy, 15, 112-124. McGregor, S.L.T. (2001). Neoliberalism and health care. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(2), 82-89. Navarro, V. (2009). What we mean by social determinants of health. International Journal of Health Services, 39, 423-441.

6