Agriculture: Accident-prone Working Environment - Science Direct

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 7 (2015) 209 – 214

Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture, 7th International Scientific Symposium

Agriculture: accident-prone working environment Halina Pawlak*a Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębekb b

a Centre for Ergonomics, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 28 Głęboka Street, 20-612 Lublin, Poland Office of Occupational and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Abstract The article presents the analysis of agriculture as working environmentally prone to accidents. A questionnaire has been used for the evaluation which included 15 questions for establishing causes of accidents at work in agriculture. Studies have shown that haste, mess and failure to comply with basic safety rules is the most common cause of accidents. It is therefore necessary to raise farmers' awareness about the risks of accident.

© by Elsevier B.V. is anB.V. open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © 2015 2015 Published The Authors. Published by This Elsevier (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Centre wallon de Recherches agronomiques (CRA-W). Peer-review under responsibility of the Centre wallon de Recherches agronomiques (CRA-W) Keywords: accidents; agriculture; prevention.

1. Introduction Working on a private farm is considerably different to working on an industrial farm. It can be described as seasonal and it entails frequent changes of performed activities as well as conditions in which they are performed. It takes more than 12 hours a day for people working in the countryside to do their tasks whatever the season and weather conditions (Pawlak and Hołaj, 2012; Cież, 2010). Their workplace is not only the house but also the yard, farm buildings, the field and sometimes ponds. Farmers changing their workplace, the level of its mechanization, working tools and daily working time change, which along with the exposure to many hazardous mechanical factors including thermal, dust, biological and chemical ones, leads to fatigue and increases the risk of an accident (KRUS, CIOP, 2015; Juliszewski, 2007; Nowakowicz-Dębek et al., 2011; Nowakowicz-Dębek et al., 2014; Pawlak et al.,

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +0048 8153197446; fax: +0048 815333549. E-mail address: [email protected]

2210-7843 © 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Peer-review under responsibility of the Centre wallon de Recherches agronomiques (CRA-W) doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.019

Halina Pawlak and Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek / Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 7 (2015) 209 – 214

2013). The act of social insurance for farmers defines an occupational accident as an unexpected occurrence caused by an external factor which happened whilst conducting an activity on a farm, on the way from the house to the farm and on the way back, as well as during usual activities conducted away from the farm but connected with the farm (Dz.U., 2009; Dz.U., 2015). In the year 2014 21,939 accidents were recorded in agriculture in Poland. One-off compensations were paid, for damage to health or death accruing from occupational accidents, to 15,649 cases. The number of accidents is smaller compared to 2013 (6.1% decline), however, the overall number is still high (fig.1). KRUS statistics (2015) show a downturn as accidents with children are not recorded.

1 800 1 570

28 000

26 943

1 544 26 305

1 523

1 501 1 478

25 772

24 008

23 374

1 200

21 000

14 000 600 7 000

0

The number of insured in thousands

35 000

Number of events

210

0 2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

number of accidents the number of insured in thousands

Fig.1. Number of farming accidents between 2005 and 2014 (KRUS, 2015)

According to statistics, most fatal accidents happened due to ‘being run over, being struck, being caught by a moving vehicle’ and ‘falling’ – 15 victims, ‘falling objects’ – 14 victims, ‘sudden attack of illness’ – 11 people, but the cause of fatal accidents mentioned was mostly badly organized work (GUS, 2014). Taking into consideration types of incidents, most people were injured because of ‘falling’ – 7,647 (49 % of all one-off paid compensations), ‘being caught or hit by moving parts of machines and devices’ – 2,047 (13.1 %) and ‘being hit, crushed or bitten by animals’ – 1,867 (12 %). Statistics show that there is no voivodeship (territorial unit) in Poland where there have been no recorded agricultural accident. There are still a high number of accidents in this economic sector. This is why a detailed analysis of this particular work environment has been conducted . 2. Material and methods The analysis was conducted amongst farmers running medium-size and small agricultural holdings in central and eastern Poland. An independent survey was used to conduct the analysis; it included 15 varied multiple-choice questions, open questions, yes/no questions. The questions were arranged into thematic sections: principles of OHS, training, maintenance of machines and equipment, use of personal protective equipment, causes and effects of accidents. The group of respondents selected for the study consisted of 100 farmers aged 20-48. The results were analysed statistically. 3. Results and analysis Taking preventive actions leads to raising awareness concerning hazards occurring in a farmer’s work environment. Access to information about prevention measures and their usage at work indirectly causes the


reduction of a negative effect of hazards, which leads to a decrease in accidents. In the study conducted, the respondents point to the fact that they actively participate in training organized by different institutions (fig.2).

Fig.2. Does he/she participate in OHS trainings?

The most popular training sessions and lectures are those organized by Agricultural Social Insurance Fund. One of the causes of accidents in agriculture is the lack of knowledge of OHS principles and unwillingness to familiarize oneself with safety instructions for the maintenance of machines and equipment (fig.3).

Fig.3. Does he/she know OHS principles used in agriculture, does he/she familiarize himself/herself with safety instructions for machines/equipment?

Another hazard occurring in agricultural holdings is the misuse of machines/equipment. Over 20% of the respondents indicate such a possibility of equipment usage depending on the existing need or the organization of work in the agricultural holding (fig.4).

211

212


Fig.4. Are the machines/equipment used according to their proper usage?

During training sessions for farmers the issue of usage of personal protective equipment is raised. The respondents indicate that they willingly use such equipment; however, using it is often dependent on economical factors (fig.5). Most often the interviewees use safety goggles (55%) and protective masks (38%) as prevention measures.

Fig.5. Do you use personal protective equipment?

In contrast, coveralls, and non-slip footwear are not frequently used (20% and 18%). Probably, because their use requires additional costs. The interviewees indicate that even though their awareness concerning OHS and the use of personal protective equipment has been raised, accidents occurred in almost 40% of agricultural holdings (fig.6).


Fig.6. Were there any accidents in the agricultural holding last year?

Respondents asked about other causes of accidents definitely indicated the lack of planning activities, the rush and clutter on the farm. 4. Conclusions Agriculture is a high-risk sector, in which thousands of occupational accidents happen every year. In this sector there is a wide variety of ages. Young people’s knowledge does not correlate with experience of older farmers. Scientific studies confirm a strong relation between the quality of work in agriculture, observing the principles of OHS and the risk of injuries and fatalities. It has been shown that practical training sessions for young farmers have a big influence on the quality of their agricultural holdings and reduction of hazards. Moreover, important differences have been observed in how agricultural holdings are run by men and women (Ramaswamy and Mosher, 2015; Kuta and Cież, 2013). Pompeii et al. (2015), just like our own analysis, points to a frequent misuse of agricultural equipment and use of equipment which has no appropriate protection. It has been shown that being in a hurry, mess in the agricultural holding, misusing machines are the most common causes of accidents, the number of which is still the same. In the studied region the accident rate is 13.8 for a thousand of the insured. During the summer of 2014 there were 6 fatalities and over 1,500 injured. This is why it is necessary to constantly train farmers and emphasize the importance of being familiar with safety instructions and health and safety regulations for work safety. The formation of custom to maintain order in the area around the farm and the organization of the working day, is another factor to eliminate accidents in agriculture. It is also important to transfer of such information already at the stage of vocational training. References Cież, J., 2010. The technical level of safety and the risk of accidents on family farms. IMW, Lublin (in polish). Good health and safety practices at seeding, cultivation and harvesting of cereals. 2009. KRUS, CIOP-PIB, Warsaw (in polish). Juliszewski, T., 2007. Technical progress in agriculture and safety at work. Atest 11, 21-23. GUS, 2015. Polish Statistical Yearbook, Warsow (in polish). KRUS (Agricultural Social Insurance Fund), 2015. Accidents at work and occupational diseases farmers and preventive measures of KRUS 2014, Warsow (in polish). Kuta, Ł., Cież, J., 2013. Rating level of safety in a family farm. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 58 (2). Nowakowicz-Dębek, B., Bartkiewicz, E., Wlazło, Ł., Klimek, K, 2011. Exposure people employed in agriculture to bio-aerosols and dust during harvesting work. Threats to biological agents in agriculture. Hitherto and new problem. Monograph, IMW, Lublinie, 1 13-124 (in polish).

213

214

Halina Pawlak and Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek / Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 7 (2015) 209 – 214 Nowakowicz-Dębek, B., Pawlak, H., Wlazło, Ł., Kuna-Broniowska, I., Bis-Wencel, H., Buczaj, A., Maksym, P., 2014. Evaluation of working conditions of workers engaged in tending horses. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 21, No 4, 730–734. Pawlak, H., Hołaj, H., 2012.. The impact of the organization of work in agriculture for the safety of worker. IMW, Lublin (in polish). Pawlak, H., Maniak, B., Petkowicz, B., Kuna-Broniowska, I., Petkowicz, J., Buczaj, A., 2013. Analysis of situation of rural women in the Lublin Region from the aspect of loading with work. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, Vol 20, No 4, 826-831. Pompei, D., Rossi, R., Vecchiola, R., Angelone, AM., Fabiani, L., 2015 Accident prevention in agriculture in the ASL1 Abruzzo Local Health Service: protection facilities for tractors. Med Lav. 106(4): 261-70. Ramaswamy, S.,K., Mosher, GA., 2015. Perceptions of Agricultural College Students on the Relationship between Quality and Safety in Agricultural Work Environments. J Agric Saf Health. 21 (1): 47-64. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 1 lipca 2009 w sprawie ustalenia okoliczności i przyczyn wypadków przy pracy (DZ.U.2009, nr 105, poz. 870). Ustawa z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników (Dz. U. z 2015 r. poz.: 704).