AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Journal of Climate
EARLY ONLINE RELEASE This is a preliminary PDF of the author-produced manuscript that has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. Since it is being posted so soon after acceptance, it has not yet been copyedited, formatted, or processed by AMS Publications. This preliminary version of the manuscript may be downloaded, distributed, and cited, but please be aware that there will be visual differences and possibly some content differences between this version and the final published version. The DOI for this manuscript is doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0372.1 The final published version of this manuscript will replace the preliminary version at the above DOI once it is available. If you would like to cite this EOR in a separate work, please use the following full citation: Yao, J., T. Zhou, Z. Guo, X. Chen, L. Zou, and Y. Sun, 2017: Improved performance of High-Resolution Atmospheric Models in simulating the EastAsian Summer Monsoon Rainbelt. J. Climate. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0372.1, in press.
© 2017 American Meteorological Society
Manuscript (non-LaTeX)
Click here to download Manuscript (non-LaTeX) Revised manuscript_20170727.docx
1
Improved performance of High-Resolution Atmospheric Models in
2
simulating the East-Asian Summer Monsoon Rainbelt
3
Junchen YAO1,2 Tianjun ZHOU1 Zhun GUO1,3 Xiaolong Chen1 Liwei ZOU1 Yong SUN1
4
1 LASG, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029
5
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
6
3 CCRC, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Corresponding author:
14
Tianjun Zhou
15
LASG, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
16
Chinese Academy of Sciences
17
Beijing 100029, China.
18
Phone: 86-10-8299-5279
19
E-mail:
[email protected]
1
20
Abstract
21 22
Simulating the East-Asian summer monsoon (EASM) rainbelt has been proven challenging
23
for climate models. In this study, the impacts of high-resolution to the simulation of spatial
24
distributions and rainfall intensity of the EASM rainbelt are revealed based on Atmospheric
25
Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations from Coupled Model Intercomparison
26
Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models. A set of sensitivity experiments is further performed to
27
eliminate the potential influences of differences among CMIP5 models. The results show that
28
the high-resolution models improve the intensity and the spatial pattern of the EASM rainfall
29
compared to the low-resolution models, further valid in the sensitivity experiments. The
30
diagnosis of moist static energy (MSE) balance and moisture budgets is further performed to
31
understand the mechanisms underlying the enhancements. Both analyses indicate that the
32
improved EASM rainfall is benefitted from the intensified meridional convergence along the
33
EASM rainbelt simulated by the high-resolution models. In addition, such convergence is
34
mainly contributed by intensified stationary meridional eddy northerly flows over the mid-
35
north of China and southerly flows on the south of Japan due to increased model resolution,
36
which is robust in the sensitivity experiments. Further analysis indicates that the stationary
37
meridional eddy flow changes in high-resolution simulations are related to the barotropic
38
Rossby wave downstream the Tibetan Plateau due to increased resolution.
39
Keywords EASM precipitation, atmospheric moisture budget, moist static energy diagnosis,
40
high resolution impact
2
41
1. Introduction
42
The East-Asian summer monsoon (EASM) is the most important climate system over East
43
Asia and it is characterized by a frontal rainbelt called Meiyu in China and Baiu in Japan,
44
respectively. The seasonal migration of the EASM rainbelt is closely related to the large-scale
45
circulation. Following the northward movement of the western Pacific subtropical high, the
46
monsoon rainbelt extends from the Indochina Peninsula in the South China Sea to the Yangtze
47
River valley from early June to mid-July (Ding 1992; Ding and Chan 2005; Zhou et al. 2009b;
48
Sampe and Xie 2010). Extreme climate events (e.g., north China floods in 2012 and heat wave
49
of central east China in 2013) occuring over East Asia, are closely related to the variability in
50
EASM precipitation (Waliser, 2006; Sampe and Xie, 2010; Zhou et al. 2009a, 2013, 2014).
51
Therefore, the mechanism of EASM precipitation formation has been a major research focus
52
of the monsoon study community (Sampe and Xie, 2010; Molnar et al. 2010; Chen and Bordoni
53
2014a, 2014b).
54
Climate models are powerful tools for monsoon research. Many studies have demonstrated
55
the models’ basic performance in simulating the EASM precipitation (Zhou and Li 2002; Chen
56
et al. 2010; Zhou and Zou 2010; Zhou et al. 2013). However, significant biases exist in
57
simulating both the rainfall intensity and spatial distribution, especially for low-resolution
58
general circulation models (GCMs), such as remarkable deficiencies in reproducing the
59
location, amount, and seasonal evolution of precipitation over East Asia (Kang et al. 2002;
60
Zhou and Li 2002; Chang 2004; Zhou et al. 2009a; Huang et al. 2013). These biases are related
61
to both the imperfect representation of basic physical and dynamical processes (e.g., moist
62
convection and large-scale circulation) (Bony et al.2013; Huang et al. 2013; Dai et al. 2013) 3
63
and the complex topography over East Asia (Chen 1983; Boos and Hurley, 2013).
64
The resolution of a GCM is proposed to be a major factor that affects a model’s performance
65
in simulating EASM precipitation (Solomon et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2013). Previous studies
66
have confirmed that high-resolution models more effectively reproduce the temperature, large-
67
scale circulation, atmospheric teleconnections and precipitation (Cherchi and Navarra 2007;
68
Dirmeyer et al. 2011; Hertwig et al. 2015; Johnson et al. 2015). The spatial distribution and
69
rainfall intensity of EASM precipitation are one of the dramatic improvements in high-
70
resolution models (Zhou and Li, 2002; Kitoh and Kusunoki, 2006; Gao et al. 2006). However,
71
the physical and dynamic mechanisms of increasing resolution responsible for the
72
improvements remain unknown.
73
The exact physical mechanisms underlying the formation and maintenance of the Meiyu-
74
Baiu (MB) rainbelt are still controversial. Some studies emphasize the role of the subtropical
75
westerly jet, which triggers the MB by transporting warm advection from the Tibetan Plateau
76
to the MB domain (Sampe and Xie 2010). However, recent studies indicate that one of the
77
essential factors affecting the EASM rainbelt is the stationary eddy meridional velocity (Chen
78
and Bordoni 2014a, 2014b). The related meridional advection of atmospheric dry enthalpy and
79
moisture flux convergence sustains and intensifies the MB rainfall system. Which mechanism
80
dominates the improvement of MB simulation from low- to high-resolution climate models
81
deserves study.
82
The purposes of this study are to answer the following two questions: 1) Whether the high-
83
resolution models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) can
4
84
better reproduce the MB rainbelt compared to the low-resolution counterparts. 2) If so, based
85
on dynamical diagnoses, whether the large-scale circulation or the humidity overwhelm the
86
rainfall improvements should be revealed. 3) If increased model resolution does have impact
87
on the large-scale circulation or the humidity, what are the related dynamical mechanisms? Are
88
the related mechanisms merely related to the changes of horizontal resolutions? For the third
89
scientific question, a set of sensitivity experiments with identical physical schemes, in order to
90
avoid potential influences from CMIP5 model differences among physical schemes, would be
91
included.
92
The remainder of this study is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the reanalysis
93
datasets, models and analysis method used in this study. In section 3, we present our main
94
results. Section 4 provides concluding remarks.
95
2. Data and Methods
96
a. Data description
97
Monthly precipitation data were collected from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project
98
(GPCP) Version 2.2 Monthly Combined Precipitation Dataset (Adler et al. 2003; Huffman et
99
al. 2009). Wind, temperature, specific humidity, heat flux and radiation variables were collected
100
from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis
101
(ERA) Interim (Dee et al. 2011). The surface heat flux and radiation datasets are 3-h forecast
102
fields obtained at 0000 and 1200UTC. Also the wind, temperature, specific humidity variables
103
were collected from the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA55) for the comparison (Ebita et al.
104
2011). These observation and reanalysis datasets are chosen due to their relatively high
5
105
resolution (around 1 degree).
106
In this study, in order to eliminate the sea surface temperature biases from coupled models
107
(Song and Zhou 2009), monthly data of 16 AGCMs participating in the CMIP5 are examined.
108
The AGCMs are divided into two groups by horizontal resolution. i.e., high horizontal
109
resolution (higher than 1 degree) models (HRM) and low horizontal resolution (lower than 1
110
degree) models (LRM). Since AGCMs with resolution lower than and around 1 degree do not
111
show improvements of rainfall as the high-resolution models do, thus 1 degree is chosen as a
112
threshold. Detailed information on the AGCMs is listed in Table 1.
113
114
Data from 1979 to 2004 are used in this study. b. Sensitivity experiment
115
Considering the different physical schemes employed in the used CMIP5 models may
116
obscure the results, we perform three sensitive experiments at 1.9×2.5 (CAM5-2deg),
117
0.9×1.25 (CAM5-1deg) and 0.47×0.63 (CAM5-0.5deg) by using CAM5.3, an AGCM
118
developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which only differs by the
119
resolution but with the same framework and physical schemes. The model employs default
120
finite-volume dynamical core, Zhang and McFarlane’s deep convection scheme (Zhang and
121
McFarlane 1995, Neale et al 2008), Park and Bretherton’s (2009) shallow convection scheme
122
and Morrison and Gettelman (MG) microphysics scheme (Morrison and Gettelman, 2008;
123
Gettelman et al. 2010). All configurations have 30 vertical levels. We integrate the model for
124
eight year with the three kinds of horizontal resolution, forced by the same prescribed
125
climatological sea surface temperatures (SST) with annual cycle. The climatological SST were
6
126
chosen because the focus of this study is the impacts of horizontal resolutions on the EASM
127
rainfall.
128
c. Methods
129
1) Moisture static energy balance
130
The moist static energy (MSE) budget is a useful tool for quantifying the roles of temperature,
131
specific humidity, radiative processes and large-scale circulation in the spatial distribution of
132
rainfall due to deep convection (Chou and Neelin 2003; Neelin 2007; Chou et al. 2013; Chen
133
and Bordni 2014a, 2014b; Sun et al. 2015). To understand the main factors that affect the spatial
134
distribution of EASM precipitation, the MSE balance analysis is determined. Under a quasi-
135
equilibrium assumption of deep convection, a vertically integrated MSE budget averaged over
136
a climatological period can be written as
137
M h Fnet v M t p
(1)
138
where the M=cpT+Lvq is the moist enthalpy, h= cpT+Lvq+gz, Fnet is the net energy entering
139
the atmospheric column, and 𝜔 is pressure velocity. T and q refer to air temperature and
140
specific humidity, respectively. is a vertical mass integral (i.e., 〈𝑋〉 = 𝑔−1 ∫ 𝑋𝑑𝑝 ), and
141
X
142
143
144 145
denotes the temporal mean, which is a two-month (June and July) mean. Fnet can be further decomposed as
Fnet St St Ss Ss Rt Rs Rs SH LH
(2)
where the subscripts s and t on the solar (S) and longwave (R) radiative terms denote the surface and model top and SH and LH denote sensible and latent heat flux, respectively. 7
146
2) Moisture budget analysis
147
Moisture budget analyses are widely used to examine precipitation distributions and
148
changes (Chou and Lan 2012). To understand the physical processes that modulate the EASM
149
rainfall intensity and related model biases, a moisture budget analysis is conducted.
150
Precipitation in the MB region should satisfy the moisture budget: P t q ( vq) pq E
151
(3)
152
Compared to the other terms, the tendency term −< ̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑡 𝑞 > can be ignored due to its small
153
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ climatological mean magnitude. The vertical term −< 𝜕 𝑝 (𝜔𝑞) > can also be neglected due
154
to the negligible magnitude of vertical motion at the bottom and top of the atmospheric column.
155
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ The moisture flux term convergence −< ∇ ∙ (𝐯𝑞) > can be further written as zonal moisture
156
flux convergence −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑥 (𝑢𝑞) > and as meridional moisture flux convergence −
.
158
3. Results
159
a. Comparison of EASM rainfall pattern between high- and low-resolution models
160
Following previous studies (Ding and Chan 2005; Zhou et al. 2009b), the MB season is
161
generally defined as the June-July average. As shown in Figure 1a, the precipitation from GPCP
162
shows an organized elongated rainbelt spanning over East Asia and the northwestern Pacific.
163
The maximum center locates in the Yangtze River valley of China and in the southwestern
164
Japan. The weighted average precipitation is 6.7 mm/day over the southeast China region (SC;
165
112.5°~122.5°E, 25°~35°N), and it is 7.6 mm/day over the southwestern Japan region (SJ;
166
125°~145°E, 27°~37°N). A wedge of deficit rainfall is located south of the Baiu rainbelt, 8
167
marking the positioning of the northwestern Pacific subtropical high (~25°N). The spatial
168
distribution of ascending motion at 400 hPa matches the MB rainfall patterns well.
169
The results of the ensemble mean of the LRMs are shown in Fig. 1b. The elongated rain belt
170
is generally captured by LRMs with weaker magnitude over the SC and the SJ region. Rainfall
171
amount simulated by LRMS over the SC and SJ are 5.6 mm/day and 4.8 mm/day respectively.
172
Compared to the observation, the main biases of precipitation from the LRMs are the deficit
173
rainfall between the eastern China and Japan on the ocean, which leads to a bow-like rainfall
174
pattern. In addition, the rain belt shows poleward displacement that is related to the northward
175
shifted ascending motion. In addition, the weakened ascending motion, especially between the
176
eastern China and Japan, results in the underestimation of precipitation in LRMs. The pattern
177
correlation coefficient (PCC) over the MB region (box defined in Fig. 1) between the LRMs
178
and observation is 0.31, and the root mean square difference (RMSE) is 2.1. As shown in Table
179
2, the PCCs between most of the LRMs and observation are generally below 0.50, and the
180
RMSEs generally exceed 1.8, except ACCESS1-0 and HadGEM2-A.
181
The HRMs also reasonably capture the spatial pattern of the MB rain belt (Fig. 1c). Two
182
rainfall centers over the Yangtze River valley in China and over the southwestern Japan are
183
also reproduced, though the rainfall intensities are slightly underestimated compared to the
184
observation. In HRMs, precipitation over the SC and SJ are 6.0 mm/day and 6.3 mm/day
185
respectively. Benefiting from the enhanced rainfall amount over the SJ region, the rain belt
186
between the eastern China and Japan is more concentrated in the HRMs. However, there is not
187
a significant enhancement in the rainfall over SC when the resolution improves. The ascending
188
motion simulated by the HRMs is stronger than it by the LRMs, especially on the east of China, 9
189
which leads to the enhancement of precipitation. The PCC between the simulated and observed
190
precipitation over the MB region is 0.76, and the RMSE is 1.3. As shown in Table 2, the PCCs
191
between HRMs and observation are greater than 0.6, and the RMSEs generally below 1.3,
192
except GFDL-HIRAM-C180.
193
The regional averaged rainfall amounts over the red box (112.5°~145°E; 25°~37°N) in Fig.
194
1 from all models against the mean of horizontal resolutions are shown in Fig. 2. According to
195
the observation, the regional averaged rainfall is 7.1 mm/day. The magnitude of rainfall over
196
the MB region arises along with the increase of model horizontal resolution. MRI models show
197
the nearest simulated rainfall amount to the observations, reaching a magnitude of nearly 6.5
198
mm/day. Notably, some of the models do not follow such precipitation-resolution relationship,
199
e.g., the CCSM4, CESM1-CAM5 and GFDL-HIRAM, indicating that differences of model
200
dynamical frame and physical schemes may obscure the results. The rainfall reproduced by
201
sensitivity experiments increase from 5.1mm/day to 6.3mm/day as resolution increases (Fig. 2
202
purple markers) that show consistency to the precipitation-resolution relationship, confirming
203
the influence of model horizontal resolution on the EASM rainfall. However, as the resolution
204
increases, the precipitation improvement seems to have a limit. This implies HRM adjusting
205
parameterization scheme may be necessary for better performance in simulating the EASM
206
rainfall. Actually, the convection parameterization will be not needed in the convection-
207
resolving scale.
208
In brief, both the LRMs and HRMs reasonably reproduce the MB rain belt. In addition, the
209
magnitude of MB rainfall is enhanced in HRMs, especially over the ocean on the south of Japan,
210
compared to the LRMs. However, the enhancement over the SC region is not significant. The 10
211
enhanced rainfall intensity over the ocean on the south of Japan in the HRMs is related to the
212
enhanced ascending motion. To show which physical processes are responsible for the
213
enhancement of convection over the MB region, an MSE balance analysis will be performed
214
in the following section.
215
b. Moist static energy balance analysis
216
The EASM rainfall amount simulated by the HRMs is enhanced compared to that in the
217
LRMs. To understand the processes that contribute to the enhancement, an MSE balance
218
analysis is performed to reveal the relative roles of temperature, specific humidity, radiative
219
processes and large-scale circulation. Since the vertical integration of vertical MSE advection
220
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ () is susceptible to the relatively coarse vertical resolution of models. Similar to
221
previous studies (Chou et al., 2013; Chen and Bordoni 2014a), we use a simple assumption that
222
the residual is relatively small caused by coarse vertical resolution, thus the vertical MSE
223
advection is calculated as ̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > according Eq. 1. The vertical MSE advection
224
involves pressure velocity 𝜔 and the MSE stratification < ̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑝 ℎ > . Because the latter is
225
generally negative in the stable troposphere, the region of positive < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜔𝜕𝑝 ℎ > represents
226
ascending motion (ω ) (Fig. 3b) and net energy flux into the atmosphere column
235
̅̅̅̅̅̅ ) (Fig. 3c). The former overwhelms the latter and dominates the spatial patterns of (𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡
236
vertical MSE advection, which is valid in both of the HRMs and LRMs (Fig. 3d-i). Thus, the
237
energy triggering the convection over the EASM region are mainly contributed by the
238
horizontal moist enthalpy advection.
239
Consistent with the bias in simulated MB precipitation (Fig. 2), the vertical MSE advections
240
along the rain belt in both of the LRMs and HRMs are underestimated compared with the
241
observation, which are mainly contributed by the horizontal advection term (Fig. 3b, 3e, 3h).
242
The horizontal moist enthalpy advection center between the eastern China and Japan is
243
weakened and shifted to the north of Japan in the LRMs (Fig. 3e). Such bias is considerably
244
reduced in the HRMs (Fig. 3j). The most prominent improvement is located south of Japan
245
which is averagely 38 W/m2 (55%) larger than the LRMs, to which the horizontal moist
246
enthalpy advection contributes 29 W/m2 (76%). Meanwhile, the horizontal moist enthalpy
247
advection is suppressed in the north of the East Asian region, leading to a more realistic moist
248
enthalpy advection around the front in the HRMs (Fig. 3k). However, the horizontal moist
249
enthalpy advection over the SC region is suppressed in the HRMs compared to the LRMs.
250
To more clearly show the differences between the HRMs and the LRMs, we compare the
251
differences of MSE advections with precipitation (Fig. 3j-l). The enhancements of precipitation,
252
accompanied with the MSE advection enhancement, mainly locates in the SJ region in the
253
HRMs. The two patterns coincidently match each other. Hence, the improvement of the EASM 12
254
rain belt over the SJ region can be explained by the enchaned horizontal moist enthalpy
255
advection (Fig. 3k).
256
c. Decomposition of horizontal moist enthalpy advection
257
Above evidences show that, the moist enthalpy advection plays a critical role in improving
258
the EASM rainfall in the HRM. To clearly identify relative importance of mean advection, eddy
259
advection, and transient advection to the moist enthalpy advection, we decompose the
260
advection term into 5 terms follow Equation A.1(detailed information seen in the Appendix).
261
Because of the small magnitude of the pure zonal mean moist enthalpy advection (−< v̅ ∙
262
̅̅̅̅̅ ∇𝑀 >), it is ignorable in the following analysis. The remained 4 terms are the advection of
263
stationary eddy energy by zonal-mean flow −< ̅̅̅̅ [v] ∙ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ ∇𝑀∗ >, the advection of zonal-mean
264
energy by eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > , the advection of stationary eddy energy by the
265
stationary eddy flow, or pure eddy advection, −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ >, and the advection of transient
266
eddy energy by the transient eddy flow, or transient advection, −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ′ ∙ ∇𝑀′ >.
267
Along the EASM rain belt, the contribution from the advection of zonal-mean energy by
268
eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > and the pure eddy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ > overwhelm the
269
̅̅̅̅ ∙ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ advection of stationary eddy energy by zonal-mean flow < [v] ∇𝑀∗ > and the transient
270
advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ′ ∙ ∇𝑀′ > in the reanalysis data, which is valid in both of the HRMs and
271
LRMs (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4, both of the LRMs and HRMs reasonably reproduce the
272
spatial pattern of 4 terms. In terms of the advection of stationary eddy energy by zonal-mean
273
flow < ̅̅̅̅ [v] ∙ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ ∇𝑀∗ > (Fig. 4a-c) and transient advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ′ ∙ ∇𝑀′ > (Fig. 4j-l), the HRMs
274
(LRMs) simulated them by 15.1 W/m2 (17.5 W/m2) and -19.5 W/m2 (-15.6 W/m2) over the MB
13
275
region, compared to 24.1 W/m2 and -3.5 W/m2 in the reanalysis data results. The LRMs
276
underestimate their magnitude, which are further underestimated in the HRMs. Thus, the
277
enhancement of the total moist enthalpy advection along the EASM rain belt in the HRMs are
278
contributed by the advection of zonal-mean energy by the eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > and the
279
pure eddy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ >,which averaged are 11.8 W/m2 and 19.8 W/m2 higher
280
than that in the LRMs. Although, the magnitude of these two terms are enhanced in the HRMs,
281
there is no significant added values in their spatial distribution from the LRMs, especially the
282
advection of the zonal-mean energy by eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > . This term is
283
underestimated and northward shifted in the LRMs over the SJ region. However, it is
284
overestimated on the south of Japan and underestimated over the east mainland of China in the
285
HRMs. In terms of the pure eddy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ >, the HRMs well capture its spatial
286
distribution, while the LRMs show insufficient skills around the SJ region.
287
To clearly identify relative importance of zonal influence, meridional influence, dry
288
enthalpy and moist enthalpy to the advection of the zonal-mean energy by eddy flow −
and the pure eddy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀 ∗ >, we decompose the total horizontal
290
moist enthalpy advection term into 20 terms (Eq. A.2). Two terms are consisted of 8 terms (the
291
9th to 16th terms at right hand of Eq. A.2). The results of the decomposition averaged over
292
enhanced rainfall area (25°~ 34°N, 120°~ 155°E) are shown in Fig. 5. The results indicate the
293
enhanced energy advection in the HRMs is mainly contributed by two terms, which are the
294
advection of eddy moist energy by eddy meridional flows (−< ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗ >, referred to moist
295
term) and the advection of zonal-mean dry energy by eddy meridional flows (−< ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑇] >,
296
referred to dry term). The moist (dry) term in the HRMs enhances the energy advection by 18.5 14
297
W/m2 (7.1 W/m2) compared to the LRMs. In addition, they explain 88% of the enhancement
298
from the horizontal moist advection. Thus, we focus on them in the following analysis. In terms
299
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ of the advection of eddy dry energy by eddy zonal flows (−< ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ 𝜕 x 𝑇 >) and the advection
300
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ of eddy moist energy by eddy zonal flows (−< ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ 𝜕 x 𝑞 >), the underestimation in the HRMs
301
is associated with the weakened eddy zonal velocity compared to the LRMs (figure not shown
302
here).
303
The results of dry and moist terms are shown in Fig. 6. The spatial pattern of the dry and
304
moist term indicates the warm air and moisture transported from tropical ocean by eddy
305
meridional velocity sustaining the convection along the MB rain belt in the reanalysis data (Fig.
306
6a, 5d).
307
For the dry term, it is mainly affected by the vertically integrated stationary eddy meridional
308
velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > (Fig. 5a contours), which is valid in models (Fig. 6b, 6c contours). The
309
deficiency in simulating the dry term, especially over the SJ region, is mainly resulted by the
310
weak and northward shifted vertically integrated stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣∗ >
311
in the LRMs (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, compared to that in the LRMs, the vertically integrated
312
stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > in the HRMs exhibits enhanced northerly wind
313
over the mid-north of China and enhanced southerly wind on the south of Japan. Such spatial
314
pattern results in stronger meridional convergence along the MB rainblet (Fig. 6h, 6i contours).
315
For the moist term, in the SJ region, the LRMs underestimate its magnitude compared to
316
that in the reanalysis data, while the HRMs show opposite results (Fig. 6e). The moist term is
317
mainly affected by the vertically integrated eddy meridional moisture gradient −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗>, of
15
318
which spatial distribution well explains the moist term (Fig. 6g-i). Previous study (Zhou et al.
319
2010) indicates that such moisture gradient over EASM region is highly related to the
320
circulation convergence. As shown in Fig. 6g-i, the convergence of vertically integrated eddy
321
meridional moisture gradient −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗> along the EASM rain belt is mainly due to the
322
stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ . Thus, the enhancement of the moist
323
term on the south of Japan in the HRMs is also related to the enhanced northerly over the mid-
324
north of China and enhanced southerly on the south of Japan. Such enhanced northerly and
325
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ southerly lead to stronger stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence 𝜕 𝑦 𝑣 along the
326
rain belt, especially over the SJ, in the HRMs.
327
Based on the analysis above, the stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗
328
shows its importance in improving the EASM rainbelt in the HRMs. Its PCC between the
329
HRMs and the reanalysis data is 0.78 compared to 0.64 for the LRMs, whereas the PCC of
330
vertically integrated stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > is 0.75 and 0.73 for the
331
HRMs and LRMs, respectively, indicating more importance of ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ instead of < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > in
332
the improved EASM rainfall due to high resolution. Moreover, the intensified northerly over
333
the mid-north of China and the intensified southerly wind on the south of Japan in the HRMs
334
play an important role in improving the simulation of ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ , despite its PCC show negligible
335
improvement compared to that from the LRMs. Such spatial distribution of < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > creates
336
stronger gradients over the SC and SJ region in the HRMs, exactly where the MB rainbelt
337
locates. Thus the MB rainbelt simulation is improved in the HRMs.
338
d. Moisture budget analysis
16
339 340
To further investigate the role of meridional convergence played in the enhancement of the EASM rainfall intensity in the HRMs, a moisture budget analysis is performed.
341
The area averaged (MB domain) moisture budget results based on reanalysis data and
342
models are shown in Fig. 7a. The results indicate that the precipitation over MB domain is
343
mainly contributed by the local surface evaporation (𝐸̅ ) and the meridional moisture flux
344
convergence (−< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 (𝑣𝑞) >) in both reanalysis data and AGCMs. The improvement from
345
HRMs of the evaporation (0.34 mm/day) is not as large as the meridional moisture flux
346
convergence (3.3 mm/day). Thus, the improvements of rainfall amount over MB domain is
347
attributed to intensified meridional moisture flux convergence in the HRMs.
348
To clearly identify the effects of meridional flow convergence in moisture transport, same
349
decomposition method is applied to the meridional moisture flux convergence (detailed
350
information seen in the Appendix). As shown in Fig. 7b, four terms contributed to the
351
improvement of the meridional moisture flux convergence −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 (𝑣𝑞) > . The main
352
contributors of the improvements of the meridional moisture flux convergence from HRMs are
353
three terms: stationary eddy meridional moisture transported via meridional flow convergence
354
( −< ̅̅̅ 𝑞 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ > ), zonal-mean moisture transported via stationary eddy meridional flow
355
convergence (−< ̅̅̅̅ [𝑞] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ >) and pure stationary eddy meridional moisture advection (−
). The third term is discussed in Section 3c. Thus, we focus on the former two terms
357
in the following analysis. The −< ̅̅̅ 𝑞 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ > term (the−< ̅̅̅̅ [𝑞] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ > term) contributes
358
63% (21%) enhancements to the meridional moisture flux convergence in the HRMs. Moreover,
359
both of two terms are affected by the stationary eddy meridional flow convergence, confirming
360
it plays an important role in enhanced rainfall amount in the HRMs. 17
361
The distribution of stationary eddy meridional velocity in HRMs largely enhances
362
meridional convergence over the MB domain. As a result, the moisture transport along the
363
rainbelt is intensified, thereby the enhancement of rainfall intensity of the EASM rainfall in the
364
HRMs.
365
e. Results of sensitivity experiments
366
In order to avoid the potential influence from model physics and further investigate the
367
resolution impact on the stationary eddy flow and its convergence, we performed a series of
368
sensitivity experiments using CAM5 model with the same dynamic core and physics scheme
369
at 3 different resolutions (details seen in section 2).
370
During the EASM season, all the experiments using CAM5 models at different resolutions
371
can reasonably reproduce the EASM rainbelts. However, the EASM rainfall intensity in
372
CAM5-2deg is significantly underestimated (Fig. 8a), especially over western south of Japan,
373
compared to the observation. The rainbelt over the eastern China and the southern Japan is
374
separated by an artificial minimum center (Fig. 7a), similar to the pattern observed in the
375
CMIP5 LRMs (Fig. 1b). Such a bow-like spatial distribution of precipitation also exists in
376
CAM5-1deg. When the resolution of CAM5 increases to 0.5 degree (CAM5-0.5deg), the
377
precipitation intensity is further enhanced, closer to the observation. The precipitation over
378
East China Sea and south of Japan, which is underestimated in the low resolution simulations
379
(CAM5-2deg and CAM5-1deg), is significantly enhanced in CAM5-0.5deg. Consequently, the
380
bow-like pattern over East Asia in low resolution simulations is improved in CAM5-0.5deg.
381
The PCCs of the monsoon rainbelt between CAM5-2deg, CAM5-1deg, CAM5-0.5deg and
18
382
observation are 0.26, 0.39 and 0.52, increasing with resolution. For the RMSE, the values are
383
1.81, 1.62, 1.60, respectively, decreasing with resolution. The enhancement of precipitation,
384
especially over the SJ, in CAM5 with increased resolution, are similar to those of CMIP5
385
AGCMs, indicating that model resolution does have impact on simulating EASM rainfall.
386
As mentioned in the previous sections, the precipitation is actually dominated by the
387
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence 𝜕 𝑦 𝑣 . As described in previous section, the
388
HRMs reproduce stronger northerly wind over the mid-north of China, and stronger southerly
389
wind over the south of Japan, thereby the intensified meridional convergence along the MB
390
rainbelt, compared to that in the LRMs. Such phenomenon would be verified by the CAM5
391
experiments.
392
As shown in Fig.8, the vertically integrated stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣∗ >
393
decreased over the mid-north of China, and increased over the south of Japan, with resolution
394
increasing (Fig. 8 black contours), which is similar with the CMIP5 AGCMs. Furthermore,
395
such northerly (southerly) flow over the mid-north of China (south of Japan) gradually
396
enhanced from CAM5-2deg to CAM5-0.5deg, leading to stronger meridional convergence
397
over the MB rainbelt region (Fig.8 red contours). The regional weighted averaged stationary
398
eddy meridional velocity convergences ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ over the MB rainbelt region in CAM5-2deg,
399
CAM5-1deg, CAM5-0.5deg are -1.12 ∙ 10-5s-1, -1.33 ∙ 10-5s-1, -1.45 ∙ 10-5s-1, respectively,
400
approaching -1.63∙10-5 s-1 in the reanalysis data. Such enhancements in meridional convergence
401
are also similar to those of the CMIP5 AGCMs due to increasing resolution. Thus, the
402
sensitivity experiments confirm the resolution impact on meridional flow convergence, and
403
further enhances the EASM rainfall over the SJ region. 19
404
To further investigate the meridional circulation change resulting in stronger meridional
405
convergence due to resolution impact, the differences of eddy geopotential height and
406
meridional eddy flow at 500 hPa between the low- and high- resolution simulations from the
407
CMIP5 AGCMs and sensitivity experiments are shown in Fig. 9. A Rossby wave train is
408
organized from mainland of China into the western north Pacific. In order to depict the
409
propagation direction of the wave train, the wave activity flux (WAF) at 500 hPa is calculated
410
according to Takaya and Nakamura (2001) with the differences between the high- and low-
411
resolution models (Fig. 9). As is shown, in CMIP5 HRMs, CAM5-1degree, and CAM5-
412
0.5degree, the WAFs downstream the Tibetan Plateau and over north of the south China sea
413
converge over the eastern mainland of China around 120°E, and propagate further east into the
414
western north Pacific (Fig. 9a). Such wave pattern corresponds to enhanced northerly
415
anomalies over the mid-north of China and southerly anomalies in the south of Japan, induces
416
the enhanced meridional flow convergence along the EASM rain belts. The wave patterns of
417
meridional eddy flow and eddy geopotential height are consistent between AGCMs and CAM5
418
sensitivity experiments.
419
The vertical structure of the wave train is quasi-barotropic as shown in Fig. 10, which is the
420
differences of eddy meridional eddy flow averaged from 25° to 35°N between low- and high-
421
resolution simulations from all models. Such well-organized barotropic Rossby wave structure
422
in the troposphere indicating that it is not likely resulted by the enhanced EASM rainfall, since
423
the Rossby wave driven by diabatic heating is usually organized in baroclinic structure. Notably,
424
such barotropic Rossby wave is responsible for the enhanced northerly anomalies over the mid-
425
north of China (110°~120°E) and southerly anomalies in the south of Japan (130°~140°E). 20
426
Moreover, the results of CMIP5 AGCMs are consistent with the sensitivity experiments,
427
indicating such barotropic Rossby wave is due to the increasing model resolution rather than
428
potential influences from diversities of model dynamic core and physics scheme.
429
The quasi-barotropic wave is downstream the Tibetan Plateau, and shows somewhat
430
similarity to that due to orographic forcing (Held and Ting 1989, Cook and Held 1992, Lutsko
431
and Held 2016). Thus, more realistic topography in the high-resolution simulations may
432
responsible for such wave train pattern. However, whether the barotropic Rossby wave in
433
higher resolution simulations is induced by finer topography may a set of idealized experiments
434
for further investigation
435
4. Summary
436
Climate models with higher resolutions generally exhibit enhanced performance in terms of
437
simulating the EASM rainbelt, especially on the south of Japan. To understand the underlying
438
physical mechanisms, we conducted an MSE balance analysis and moisture budget analysis to
439
examine the spatial distribution and rainfall levels of the EASM rainbelt reproduced by low-
440
and high-resolution AGCMs. Sensitivity experiments using CAM5 with identical dynamic core
441
and physics scheme but different resolutions are also performed to validate the robustness of
442
rainfall improvements and related mechanisms apart from the potential influences from
443
different physical schemes employed in CMIP5 models. Main conclusions are summarized as
444
follows.
445
(1) The EASM rainbelt simulated by LRMs is underestimated compared to the observation,
446
especially on the south of Japan. Such biases are reduced in the HRMs. The rainfall intensity
21
447
is generally enhanced by 1.0 mm/day in HRMs compared to LRMs, to which the enhancement
448
over the SJ region contributes 1.5 mm/day. The increase of PCC (0.76 for HRMs and 0.31 for
449
LRMs) and the decrease of RMSE (1.3 for HRMs and 2.1 for LRMs) indicate such
450
enhancement due to increased model resolution is robust. The results of sensitivity experiments
451
further confirm such rainfall intensity enhancements.
452
(2) By conducting an MSE balance analysis, the factor dominating improvements of EASM
453
rainfall simulation in the HRMs was found to be the horizontal MSE advection. The
454
decomposition results show that the enhanced horizontal moist enthalpy advection in the
455
HRMs results from the intensified northerly flow over the mid-north of China and southerly
456
flow on the south of Japan. Such meridional eddy stationary flow enhancements lead to
457
stronger stationary eddy meridional flow convergence along the MB rain belt in the HRMs.
458
The intensified convergence along the MB front region in the HRMs strengthens the moist
459
energy transport from the tropics, thereby the improved MB rainbelt.
460
(3) A moisture budget analysis confirms that the enhanced rainfall intensity is mainly
461
contributed by enhanced stationary eddy meridional flow convergence in HRMs. Such
462
enhanced convergence intensifies the moisture transport into the MB rainbelt in HRMs, thereby
463
the enhanced rainfall intensity.
464
(4) The above improvements of MB rainbelt and stationary eddy meridional flow
465
convergences due to increased resolution are verified by sensitivity experiments apart from
466
potential influences from different physical schemes employed in CMIP5 AGCMs. Further
467
analysis indicates that the stationary eddy meridional flow convergence along the MB rainbelt
22
468
is intensified as model resolution increased. The convergence enhancements are related to the
469
intensified northerly (southerly) flow over the mid-north of China (the south of Japan). Such
470
meridional flow changes are resulted by the barotropic Rossby wave due to increased model
471
resolution. Such barotropic wave downstream the Tibetan Plateau propagates from the east
472
China to the western North Pacific, creating stronger meridional convergence along the MB
473
rainbelt. However, whether such quasi-barotropic wave is forced by the finer topography of
474
Tibetan Plateau need further investigation.
475
476
Appendix
477
The Decomposition of Advection Term
478
As explained in section 3, during EASM season both net energy flux and horizontal moist
479
enthalpy advection play essential roles in sustaining the monsoon rainfall. However, due to the
480
significant improvements of moist enthalpy advection term and moisture reproduced by high-
481
resolution models, a method clearly differentiating the contribution from stationary eddy fluxes
482
and zonal mean fluxes should be introduced in order to seek out the improved fluxes influenced
483
by model horizontal resolution. Hence, the time mean advection term < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ v ∙ ∇𝑋 > can be
484
decomposed as
485
v X [ v] [X ] [ v] X * v* [X ] v* X * v 'X ' (A. 1)
486
Here, (𝑋)′ denotes the deviation from time 𝑋̅ (two-month June and July mean for each
487
individual year), and (𝑋)∗ denotes the deviation from the global zonal mean [𝑋], and 〈𝑋〉
488
are same as that in section 2. 23
489
As explained in Section 3c, the moist enthalpy advection term < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > plays an
490
essential role in improvements of monsoon rainfall from high- resolution models. Thus, by
491
using the decomposition method, the moist enthalpy advection term can be decomposed as
492
v M [u] [ x T] [v] [ y T] [u] [ x q] [v] [ y q] u * [ x T]
493
v* [ y T] u * [ x q] v* [ y q] [u] x T* [v] Y T*
494
[u] x q* [v] y q* u * x T* v* y T* u * x q*
495
+++++ (A. 2)
496
Here, the first four terms on the right-hand side are the zonal-mean energy advection by the
497
̅̅̅̅ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝑢] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝑢] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ zonal-mean flow (i.e., < ̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑇] >, < [𝑣] [𝜕𝑦 𝑇] >, < ̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑞] >, < ̅̅̅̅ [𝑣] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑞] >);
498
the second four terms on the right hand side denote the advection of the zonal-mean energy by
499
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅∗ the stationary eddy flow (i.e. , < ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ [𝜕 𝑥 𝑇] > , < 𝑣 ⋅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑇] > , < 𝑢 ⋅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑞] > , < 𝑣 ⋅
500
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑞] >); the third four terms on the right hand side denote the advection of the stationary eddy
501
̅̅̅̅ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅ ⋅ energy by the zonal-mean flow (i.e., < ̅̅̅̅ [𝑢] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑥 𝑇 ∗ >, < [𝑣] 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ∗ >, < ̅̅̅̅ [𝑢] ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑥 𝑞 ∗ >, < [𝑣]
502
̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗ >); the fourth four terms on the right hand side denote the advection of stationary eddy
503
energy by the stationary eddy flow (i.e., < ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑥 𝑇 ∗ >, < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ∗ >, < ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑥 𝑞 ∗ >,
); and the last four terms on the right hand side denote the advection of transient
505
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ eddy energy by transient eddies (i.e., < 𝑢′ 𝜕𝑥 𝑇 ′ > , < 𝑣 ′ 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ′ > , < 𝑢′ 𝜕𝑥 𝑞 ′ > ,
). T and q are considered in energy units in A. 2.
507
̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅ [𝑢] ⋅ [𝜕 The zonal-mean terms(i.e., < ̅̅̅̅ 𝑥 𝑇] >, < [𝑣] ⋅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑇] >, < [𝑢] ⋅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑞] >, < [𝑣] ⋅
508
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑞] >)are generally small compared to the other terms; the transient terms (i.e.,
, < 𝑣 ′ 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ′ >, < 𝑢′ 𝜕𝑥 𝑞 ′ >, < 𝑣 ′ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ′ >) are also very small due to the 24
510
long-temporal mean, and they can all thus be neglected. Besides, the contribution from
, < [𝑣] 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗ >, < [𝑣] 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ∗ >, < ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑇] >, < ̅̅̅ 𝑢∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑥 𝑞] > and < ̅̅̅ 𝑣∗ ⋅
512
̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑇 ∗ > to the total advection are much smaller compared to other terms, and they are also
513
neglected in the Section 3c.
514
As explained in Section 3d, the meridional moisture convergence flux < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 (𝑣𝑞) > is
515
another essential factor affected improvements from high- resolution models. Same as moist
516
enthalpy advection, it can be decomposed as
517
y (vq) v* y q* [v] y q* v* [ y q] [v] [ y q]
518
q* y v* [q] y v* q* [ y v] [q] [ y v]
519
v' y q' q' y v'
(A. 3)
520
̅̅̅̅ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝑞] ⋅ [𝜕 The mean terms ( < [𝑣] [𝜕𝑦 𝑞] > , < ̅̅̅̅ 𝑦 𝑣] > ) are associated with planet scale
521
circulation and humidity, thus are generally small and neglected. The stationary eddy terms (
, < [𝑣] ⋅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 > , < 𝑞 ⋅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑣] > , < 𝑞 ⋅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 > ) are associated with
523
meridional stationary eddy flows and meridional humidity distributions. The previous study
524
̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ (Chen and Bordoni 2014a) indicate that the transient terms (< 𝑣 ′ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ′ >, < 𝑞′𝜕𝑦 𝑣′ >)
525
play a minor role compared to the other terms due to the long-temporal mean, and they are
526
neglected in Section 3d. In addition, the contribution from these eddy terms (< ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗ >,
527
< ̅̅̅ 𝑞 ∗ ⋅ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ [𝜕𝑦 𝑣] >) to the total meridional moisture convergence flux are gradually less than 0.1
528
mm/day, thus can be neglected.
529
25
530
Acknowledgments. This work was jointly supported by R&D Special Fund for Public
531
Welfare Industry (meteorology) (GYHY201506012), National Natural Science Foundation of
532
China (NFSC) under Grant No. 41420104006 and No. 41125017.
26
533 References
534 Adler, R.F., and coauthors, 2003: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) 535
Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-Present). J. Hydrometeor., 4,1147-1167.
536 Bony, S., and coauthors, 2013: Carbon dioxide and climate: Perspectives on a scientific 537
assessment. Climate Science for Serving Society, edited by G. R. Asrar and J. W. Hurrell,
538
Springer, Dordecht, 391-413.
539 Boos, W.R., J.V. Hurley, 2013: Thermodynamic bias in the multimodel mean boreal summer 540
monsoon. J. Climate. 26: 2279-2287.
541 Chang, C.P., 2004: East Asian Monsoon vol. 2. World Sci., Singapore, pp. 301–331.
542 Chen, G.J., 1983: Observational aspects of the Mei-Yu phenomena in subtropical China. J. 543
Meteor. Soc. Japan, 61, 306-312.
544 Chen, H.M., T.J. Zhou, R. B. Neale, X.Q. Wu, G.J. Zhang, 2010: Performance of the New NCAR 545
CAM3.5 in East Asian Summer Monsoon Simulations: Sensitivity to Modifications of the
546
Convection Scheme. J. Climate. 23, 3657-3675.
547 Chen J., S. Bordoni, 2014a: Orographic effects of the Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian summer 548
monsoon: An energetic perspective. J. Climate. 27, 3052-3072.
549 Chen J., S. Bordoni, 2014b: Intermodel spread of East Asian summer monsoon simulations in 550
CMIP5. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1314-1321. doi:10.1002/2013GL058981.
551 Cherchi, A., and Navarra, A., 2007: Sensitivity of the Asian summer monsoon to the horizontal 552
resolution: differences between AMIP-type and coupled model experiments. Climate Dyn., 27
553
28, 273-290.
554 Chou C., J. Neelin, 2003: Mechanisms Limiting the Northward Extent of the Northern Summer 555
Monsoons over North America, Asia, and Africa. J. Climate., 16, 406-425, doi:10.1175/ 1520-
556
0442(2003)016,0406:MLTNEO.2.0.CO;2.
557 Chou C., C. Lan, 2012: Changes in the annual range of precipitation under global warming. J. 558
Climate., 25, 222-235. doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00097.1.
559 Chou C., T. Wu, P. Tan, 2013: Changes in gross moist stability in the tropics under global 560
warming. Climate Dyn.. 41, 2481-2496. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1703-2.
561 Cook, K. H., I. M. Held, 1992: The stationary response to large-scale orography in a general 562
circulation model and a linear model. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 525-539.
563 Dai, A.G., H.M. Li, Y. Sun, L.C. Hong, L. Ho, C. Chou, and T.J. Zhou, 2013: The Relative Roles 564
of Upper and Lower Tropospheric Thermal Contrasts and Tropical Influences in Driving
565
Asian Summer Monsoons, J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 7024-7045, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50565.
566 Dee, D., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of 567
the data assimilation system. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553-597. doi:10.1002/qj.828.
568 Ding, Y., 1992: Summer monsoon rainfalls in China. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 70, 373–396.
569 Ding, Y., and J. Chan, 2005: The East Asian summer monsoon: Anoverview. Meteor. Atmos. 570
Phys., 89, 117–142, doi:10.1007/s00703-005-0125-z.
571 Dirmeyer, P. A., and Coauthors, 2012: Simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall in global climate 572
models: Resolution versus parameterization. Climate Dyn., 39, 399-418. 28
573 Ebita, A., and Coauthors. 2011: The Japanese 55-year Reanalysis" JRA-55": an interim report. 574
Sola, 7, 149-152.
575 Gettelman, A., and Coauthors, 2010: Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation 576
with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Geophys. Res.:
577
Atmos., 115(D18).
578 Gao, X., Y. Xu, Z. Zhao, J.S. Pal, and F. Giorgi, 2006: On the role of resolution and topography 579
in the simulation of East Asia precipitation. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 86, 173-185.
580 Held, I. M., M. Ting, 1990: Orographic versus thermal forcing of stationary waves: The 581
importance of the mean low-level wind. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 495-500.Hertwig, E., von Storch,
582
J. S., Handorf, D., Dethloff, K., Fast, I., and Krismer, T., 2015: Effect of horizontal resolution
583
on ECHAM6-AMIP performance. Climate Dyn., 45, 185-211, doi: 10.1007/s00382-014-
584
2396-x.
585 Huang, D. Q., J. Zhu, Y.C. Zhang and A.N. Huang, 2013: Uncertainties on the simulated summer 586
precipitation over eastern China from the CMIP5 models. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 9035-9047.
587 Huffman, G.J, R.F. Adler, D.T. Bolvin, G. Gu 2009: Improving the Global Precipitation Record: 588
GPCP Version 2.1. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17808, doi:10.1029/2009GL040000.
589 Johnson, S. J., and Coauthors, 2015: The resolution sensitivity of the South Asian monsoon and 590
Indo-Pacific in a global 0.35° AGCM. Climate Dyn., 46, 807-831, doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-
591
2614-1.
592 Kang, I., and Coauthors, 2002: Intercomparison of the climatological variations of Asian summer
29
593
monsoon precipitation simulated by 10 GCMs. Climate Dyn.. 19, 383-395.
594 Kitoh, A., S. Kusunoki, 2008: East Asian summer monsoon simulation by a 20-km mesh AGCM. 595
Climate Dyn.. 31, 389-401.
596 Kobayashi, C., M. Sugi, 2004: Impact of horizontal resolution on the simulation of the Asian 597
summer monsoon and tropical cyclones in the JMA global model. Climate Dyn.. 23, 165-176.
598 Lutsko, N. J., I. M. Held, 2016: The Response of an Idealized Atmosphere to Orographic Forcing: 599
Zonal versus Meridional Propagation. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3701-3718.
600 Molnar, P., W. Boos, D. Battisti, 2010: Orographic controls on climate and paleoclimate of Asia: 601
thermal and mechanical roles for the Tibetan Plateau. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 38, 77,
602
doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152456.
603 Morrison, H., A. Gettelman, 2008: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics 604
scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and
605
numerical tests. J. Climate., 21, 3642-3659.
606 Neale, R. B., J. H. Richter, M. Jochum, 2008: The impact of convection on ENSO: From a 607
delayed oscillator to a series of events. J. Climate., 21, 5904-5924.
608 Neelin, J., 2007: dynamics of tropical convection zones in monsoons, teleconnections, and global 609
warming. The Global Circulation of the Atmosphere., Princeton University Press, 267-301.
610 Park, S., C. S. Bretherton, 2009: The University of Washington shallow convection and moist 611
turbulence schemes and their impact on climate simulations with the Community Atmosphere
612
Model. J J. Climate., 22, 3449-3469.
30
613 Sampe, T., S. Xie, 2010: Large-scale dynamics of the Meiyu-Baiu Rainbelt: environmental 614
forcing by the westerly jet. J. Climate., 23, 113-134, doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3128.1.
615 Solomon, S., and Coauthors, 2007: Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Cambridge 616
University Press, 996 pp.
617 Song, F., T. Zhou, 2014: The climatology and interannual variability of East Asian summer 618
monsoon in CMIP5 coupled models: Does air–sea coupling improve the simulations? J.
619
Climate., 27, 8761-8777.
620 Sun, Y., T.J. Zhou, G. Ranstein, C. Contoux, Z. Zhang, 2015: Drivers and mechanisms for 621
enhanced summer monsoon precipitation over East Asia during the mid-Pliocene in the IPSL-
622
CM5A, Climate Dyn., 46,1437-1457, doi: 10.1007/s00382-015-2656-4.
623 Takaya, K., H. Nakamura, 2001: A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for 624
stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J. Atmos.
625
Sci., 58, 608-627.Waliser, D., 2006: The Asian Monsoon. Intraseasonal variability in the
626
atmosphere-ocean climate system, edited by Wang B. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 203-257.
627 Zhang, G. J., N. A. McFarlane, 1995: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization 628
of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model.
629
Atmosphere-ocean, 33, 407-446.
630 Zhou, T.J., Z. Li, 2002: Simulation of the East Asian summer monsoon using a variable resolution 631
atmospheric GCM. Climate Dyn., 19, 167-180.
632 Zhou, T.J., B. Wu, B. Wang, 2009a: How well do atmospheric general circulation models capture
31
633
the leading modes of the interannual variability of the Asian-Australian monsoon?. J. Climate.,
634
22, 1159-1173.
635 Zhou, T.J., D. Gong, J. Li, and B. Li, 2009b: Detecting and understanding the multi-decadal 636
variability of the East Asian Summer Monsoon–Recent progress and state of affairs. Meteorol.
637
Z., 18, 455-467.
638 Zhou, T.J., Zou, L., 2010: Understanding the predictability of East Asian summer monsoon from 639
the reproduction of land-sea thermal contrast change in AMIP-type simulation. J. Climate.,
640
23, 6009-6026.
641 Zhou, T.J., F. Song, R. Lin, X. Chen, and X. Chen, 2013: The 2012 North China floods: 642
Explaining an extreme rainfall event in the context of a longer-term drying tendency. Bull.
643
Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 49-51.
644 Zhou, T.J., S. Ma, L.W. Zou, 2014: Understanding a hot summer in central eastern China: 645
Summer 2013 in context of multimodel trend analysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 54-57.
646 Zhou, X., Y. Ding, P. Wang, 2010: Moisture transport in the Asian summer monsoon region and 647
its relationship with summer precipitation in China. J. Meteorol. Res., 24, 31-42.
32
648
Figure Captions
649
Fig. 1 Climatology of June-July precipitation (shaded; units: mm/day) and vertical velocity
650
(contour; units: Pa/s; contour interval -0.02Pa/s, thick lines denote a vertical velocity equal to
651
-0.01Pa/s) at 400 hPa derived from (a) GPCP and mean of ERA-Interim and JRA55, (b) the
652
low-resolution models and (c) the high-resolution models. The red box marks the Meiyu-Baiu
653
(MB) region.
654
Fig. 2 Area averaged precipitation for the MB region for June-July (y-axis) and model
655
resolutions. Black, red, blue and purple markers refer to GPCP, low-resolution models high-
656
resolution models and sensitivity experiments, respectively.
657
Fig. 3 Climatology of the June-July vertically integrated MSE budget. The difference between
658
̅̅̅̅̅̅ and < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > for vertically integrated vertical MSE advection < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜔𝜕𝑝 ℎ > (Left),
659
vertically integrated horizontal moist enthalpy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > (center), net energy
660
flux into the atmospheric column ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 (right) for the ERA-interim (first row), the low-
661
resolution multi-model ensemble mean (second row), the high-resolution multi-model
662
ensemble mean (third row), and the differences between high- and low- resolution multi-model
663
ensemble mean (last row) (shaded, units: W/m2). Contours denote the differences of
664
climatology of June-July precipitation between high- and low-resolution models (contours
665
range from 0.5 to 2.5 by 0.5; units: mm/day).
666
Fig. 4 Decomposition of the vertically integrated horizontal moist enthalpy advection −
for the ERA-interim (left), the low-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (center),
668
the high-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (right). Rows indicate the advection of
33
669
[𝐯] ∙ ∇𝑀∗ > (top row), the advection of stationary eddy energy by the zonal-mean flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
670
zonal-mean energy by eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > (second row), the advection of stationary
671
eddy energy by the stationary eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ > (third row) and the advection of
672
transient eddy energy by the transient eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ′ ∙ ∇𝑀′ > (bottom row). (Color shading
673
is in W/m2).
674
Fig. 5 Value of main variable derived from decomposed horizontal moist enthalpy advection
675
averaged over the enhanced rainfall region (25°~ 34°N, 120°~ 155°E; units: W/m2). Each
676
variable is vertically integrated. The observation is the mean of ERA-interim and JRA55.
677
Fig. 6 The advection of zonal mean dry enthalpy by the stationary eddy meridional velocity−
(top row; shaded, units: W/m2), advection of eddy moist enthalpy by meridional 𝑣 𝑦
679
∗ ∙ 𝜕 𝑞 ∗ > (second row; shaded, units: W/m2), and, and ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ eddy meridional velocity −< 𝑣 𝑦
680
vertically integrated eddy meridional moisture gradient −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗> (bottom row; shaded,
681
units: 105 kg/(m∙s2)) for ERA-interim (left), the low-resolution multi-model ensemble mean
682
(center), the high-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (right). Contours in top row denote
683
vertically integrated stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > (range from -20.0 to 20.0 by
684
4.0, solid and dashed contours denote positive and negative value; units: 106 kg/(m∙s)), and
685
contours in bottom row denote stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ at 700
686
hPa (range from -4.0 to -1.0 by -1.0; units: 10-5 s-1).
687
Fig. 7 Results of moisture budget (a) and values of main variable decomposed from the
688
meridional moisture flux averaged over the MB region (b). Each variable is vertically
689
integrated. The observation is the mean of ERA-interim and JRA55.
34
690
Fig. 8 Climatology of June-July precipitation (shaded; units: mm/day), vertically integrated
691
meridional eddy velocity< ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > (black contour, range from -20.0 to 20.0 by 4.0, solid and
692
dashed contours denote positive and negative value; units: 106 kg/(m∙s)) and stationary eddy
693
meridional velocity convergence ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑣 ∗ at 700 hPa (red contour, range from -4.0 to -1.0 by -
694
1.0; units: 10-5 s-1) from (a) CAM5-2deg, (b) CAM5-1deg, and (c) CAM5-0.5deg, respectively.
695
The Tibetan Plateau is represented gray shaded area.
696
Fig. 9 Differences of eddy (zonal mean removed) geopotential height (shaded; units: m) and
697
meridional eddy (zonal mean removed) flow (contour; purple dashed lines denote negative
698
values, black line denote positive values and the zero contour is omitted; contour interval for
699
a, b, c are 0.1, 0.2, 0.2 respectively; units: m/s;) and wave activity flux (vector; units: m2/s2)
700
between from AMIP high- and low-resolution models (a), CAM5-1deg and 2deg (b), CAM5-
701
0.5deg and CAM5-2deg (c).
702
Fig. 10 Pressure-longitude cross sections of differences of meridional eddy (zonal mean
703
removed) flow (shaded; units: m/s) averaged from 25° and 35°N between AMIP high- and low-
704
resolution models (a), CAM5-1deg and 2deg (b), CAM5-0.5deg and CAM5-2deg (c).
35
705
Table 1 Information on the 16 CMIP5-AMIP models used in this study No.
Model
Resolution(lon*lat)
Member
1
CanAM4
2.8*2.8
1
2
IPSL-CM5A-LR
3.75*1.875
6
3
FGOALS-s2
2.8*1.65
2
4
NorESM1-M
2.5*1.875
3
5
MPI-ESM-LR
1.875*1.875
3
6
MPI-ESM-MR
1.875*1.875
3
7
inmcm4
2*1.5
1
8
HadGEM2-A
1.875*1.25
5
9
ACCESS1-0
1.875*1.25
3
10
MIROC5
1.4*1.4
2
11
CCSM4
1.25*1
6
12
CESM1-CAM5
1.25*1
1
13
MRI-AGCM3-2H
0.55*0.55
1
14
GFDL-HIRAM-C180
0.6*0.5
3
15
GFDL-HIRAM-C360
0.3*0.25
2
16
MRI-AGCM3-2S
0.18*0.18
1
706
36
707
Table 2 Pattern correlation coefficient (PCC) and root mean square difference (RMSE)
708
between models and observations over monsoon rainbelt region
709
No.
Model
PCC
RMSE
1
CanAM4
0.17
2.61
2
IPSL-CM5A-LR
0.24
2.31
3
FGOALS-s2
-0.13
2.19
4
NorESM1-M
0.01
2.2
5
MPI-ESM-LR
0.41
1.90
6
MPI-ESM-MR
0.48
1.81
7
inmcm4
-0.07
2.41
8
HadGEM2-A
0.58
1.58
9
ACCESS1-0
0.66
1.49
10
MIROC5
0.12
2.16
11
CCSM4
-0.01
2.43
12
CESM1-CAM5
0.10
2.05
13
MRI-AGCM3-2H
0.78
1.23
14
GFDL-HIRAM-C180
0.56
1.63
15
GFDL-HIRAM-C360
0.69
1.24
16
MRI-AGCM3-2S
0.82
1.32
710 37
711 712
Fig. 1 Climatology of June-July precipitation (shaded; units: mm/day) and vertical velocity
713
(contour; units: Pa/s; contour interval -0.02Pa/s, thick lines denote a vertical velocity equal to
714
-0.01Pa/s) at 400 hPa derived from (a) GPCP and mean of ERA-Interim and JRA55, (b) the
715
low-resolution models and (c) the high-resolution models. The red box marks the Meiyu-Baiu
716
(MB) region.
38
717
718 719
Fig. 2 Area averaged precipitation for the MB region for June-July (y-axis) and model
720
resolutions. Black, red, blue and purple markers refer to GPCP, low-resolution models, high-
721
resolution models and sensitivity experiments, respectively.
39
722 723
Fig. 3 Climatology of the June-July vertically integrated MSE budget. The difference between
724
̅̅̅̅̅̅ and < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > for vertically integrated vertical MSE advection < ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜔𝜕𝑝 ℎ > (Left),
725
vertically integrated horizontal moist enthalpy advection −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∙ ∇𝑀 > (center), net energy
726
flux into the atmospheric column ̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐹𝑛𝑒𝑡 (right) for the ERA-interim (first row), the low-
727
resolution multi-model ensemble mean (second row), the high-resolution multi-model
728
ensemble mean (third row), and the differences between high- and low- resolution multi-model
729
ensemble mean (last row) (shaded, units: W/m2). Contours denote the differences of
40
730
climatology of June-July precipitation between high- and low-resolution models (contours
731
range from 0.5 to 2.5 by 0.5; units: mm/day).
732
41
733 734
Fig. 4 Decomposition of the vertically integrated horizontal moist enthalpy advection −
for the ERA-interim (left), the low-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (center),
736
the high-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (right). Rows indicate the advection of
737
[𝐯] ∙ ∇𝑀∗ > (top row), the advection of stationary eddy energy by the zonal-mean flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
738
zonal-mean energy by eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ [∇𝑀] > (second row), the advection of stationary
739
eddy energy by the stationary eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ∗ ∙ ∇𝑀∗ > (third row) and the advection of
740
transient eddy energy by the transient eddy flow −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝐯 ′ ∙ ∇𝑀′ > (bottom row). (Color shading
741
is in W/m2). 42
742
743
744 745
Fig. 5 Value of main variable derived from decomposed horizontal moist enthalpy
746
advection averaged over the enhanced rainfall region (25°~ 34°N, 120°~ 155°E; units:
747
W/m2). Each variable is vertically integrated. The observation is the mean of ERA-interim
748
and JRA55.
43
749 750
Fig. 6 The advection of zonal mean dry enthalpy by the stationary eddy meridional velocity−
(top row; shaded, units: W/m2), advection of eddy moist enthalpy by meridional 𝑣 𝑦
752
∗ ∙ 𝜕 𝑞 ∗ > (second row; shaded, units: W/m2), and vertically ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ eddy meridional velocity −< 𝑣 𝑦
753
integrated eddy meridional moisture gradient −< ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ 𝜕𝑦 𝑞 ∗> (bottom row; shaded, units: 105
754
kg/(m∙s2)) for ERA-interim (left), the low-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (center), the
755
high-resolution multi-model ensemble mean (right). Contours in top row denote vertically
756
integrated stationary eddy meridional velocity < ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > (range from -20.0 to 20.0 by 4.0, solid
757
and dashed contours denote positive and negative value ; units: 106 kg/(m∙s)), and contours in
758
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ bottom row denote stationary eddy meridional velocity convergence 𝜕 𝑦 𝑣 at 700 hPa (range
759
from -4.0 to -1.0 by -1.0; units: 10-5 s-1). 44
760
761 762
Fig. 7 Results of moisture budget (Res denotes residual) (a) and values of main variable
763
decomposed from the meridional moisture flux averaged over the MB region (b). Each
764
variable is vertically integrated. The observation is the mean of ERA-interim and JRA55.
45
765 766
Fig. 8 Climatology of June-July precipitation (shaded; units: mm/day), vertically integrated
767
meridional eddy velocity< ̅̅̅ 𝑣 ∗ > (black contour, range from -20.0 to 20.0 by 4.0, solid and
768
dashed contours denote positive and negative value; units: 106 kg/(m∙s)) and stationary eddy
769
∗ ̅̅̅̅̅̅ meridional velocity convergence 𝜕 𝑦 𝑣 at 700 hPa (red contour, range from -4.0 to -1.0 by -
770
1.0; units: 10-5 s-1) from (a) CAM5-2deg, (b) CAM5-1deg, and (c) CAM5-0.5deg, respectively. 46
771
The Tibetan Plateau is represented gray shaded area.
772
47
773 774
Fig. 9 Differences of eddy (zonal mean removed) geopotential height (shaded; units: m) and
775
meridional eddy (zonal mean removed) flow (contour; purple dashed lines denote negative
776
values, black line denote positive values and the zero contour is omitted; contour interval for
777
a, b, c are 0.1, 0.2, 0.2 respectively; units: m/s;) and wave activity flux (vector; units: m2/s2)
48
778
between from AMIP high- and low-resolution models (a), CAM5-1deg and 2deg (b), CAM5-
779
0.5deg and CAM5-2deg (c).
780
49
781 782
Fig. 10 Pressure-longitude cross sections of differences of meridional eddy (zonal mean
783
removed) flow (shaded; units: m/s) averaged from 25° and 35°N between AMIP high- and low-
784
resolution models (a), CAM5-1deg and 2deg (b), CAM5-0.5deg and CAM5-2deg (c).
50