An Examination of Sociodemographic Correlates of ...

20 downloads 0 Views 519KB Size Report
Jun 23, 2014 - Sociodemographic Correlates of Ecstasy Use Among High School Seniors in the United States,. Substance Use & Misuse, 49:13, 1774-1783.
Substance Use & Misuse

ISSN: 1082-6084 (Print) 1532-2491 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/isum20

An Examination of Sociodemographic Correlates of Ecstasy Use Among High School Seniors in the United States Joseph J. Palamar & Dimitra Kamboukos To cite this article: Joseph J. Palamar & Dimitra Kamboukos (2014) An Examination of Sociodemographic Correlates of Ecstasy Use Among High School Seniors in the United States, Substance Use & Misuse, 49:13, 1774-1783 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.926933

Published online: 23 Jun 2014.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 137

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Citing articles: 1 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=isum20 Download by: [106.69.84.237]

Date: 30 October 2015, At: 10:03

Substance Use & Misuse, 49:1774–1783, 2014 C 2014 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. Copyright  ISSN: 1082-6084 print / 1532-2491 online DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2014.926933

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

An Examination of Sociodemographic Correlates of Ecstasy Use Among High School Seniors in the United States Joseph J. Palamar and Dimitra Kamboukos

Downloaded by [106.69.84.237] at 10:03 30 October 2015

New York University Langone Medical Center, Department of Population Health, New York, USA Although not limited to nightlife scenes (Horyniak et al., 2013), ecstasy is popular at dance parties, as it tends to enhance the party experience (e.g., perceptions of lights and music, nightlife socialization) (Lyttle & Montagne, 1992; Parks & Kennedy, 2004). While ecstasy use in the United States (US) is not as prevalent as in the late 1990s and early 2000s, use has remained popular in recent years (Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2013a, 2013b; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2013a; Wu et al, 2010a). Since trends in ecstasy use have changed in recent years and there is a lack of investigation of correlates of current use, especially in adolescents, research is needed to examine who is currently at high risk for use. The most recent European survey of ecstasy use showed stable or slow declining patterns in prevalence rates from 2005 to 2010, with 2 million young adults in Europe reporting past year use of ecstasy; regardless, ecstasy remains one of the three most commonly used illicit stimulants in Europe (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction [EMCDDA], 2012). The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD; Hibell & Guttormsson, 2013), which monitors trends of substance use in over 100,000 15–16-year-old students across 36 European countries, reported lifetime prevalence rates of 1–4% in 15–16-year olds across countries in 2011, with rates of 4% for the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, among others. Further, according to the Australian Secondary Students’ Alcohol and Drug Survey (ASSADS), a national school-based survey on 7th to 12th graders’ illicit and licit drug use, ecstasy use increases with age; lifetime and last year ecstasy use peaked in adolescents in 1999 and was lower in 2011, compared to other years (Miller, Bridle, Goggin, & Christou, 2012). In 2011, however, 15.4% of 17-year olds surveyed reported positive expectancies if they would take ecstasy; 5.2% of 17-year olds reported ever using ecstasy, 2.1% indicated past-year use, and 1% reported using ecstasy in the past

Background: Although ecstasy (MDMA) use is not as prevalent in the United States (US) as it was in the early 2000s, use remains popular among adolescents and young adults. Few recent studies have examined ecstasy use in national samples among those at particularly high risk for use—adolescents approaching adulthood. Research is needed to delineate sociodemographic correlates of use in this group. Methods: Data were examined from a nationally representative sample of high school seniors in the US (modal age = 18) from the Monitoring the Future study (years 2007–2012; weighted N = 26,504). Data from all cohorts were aggregated and correlates of recent (last 12month) use of ecstasy were examined. Results: Roughly 4.4% of high school seniors reported use of ecstasy within the last year. Females and religious students were consistently at lower odds for use. Black and Hispanic students, and students residing with two parents, were at lower odds for ecstasy use, until controlling for other drug use. Odds of use were consistently increased for those residing in a city, students with weekly income of >$50 from a job, and students earning >$10 weekly from other sources. Lifetime use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and other illicit drugs each robustly increased odds of ecstasy use. Conclusion: Subgroups of high school seniors, defined by specific sociodemographic factors, and those who have used other drugs, are currently at high risk for ecstasy initiation and use. Since ecstasy is regaining popularity in the US, prevention efforts should consider these factors. Keywords MDMA, ecstasy, club drugs, adolescents, socioeconomic status

INTRODUCTION

Ecstasy (MDMA, “Molly,” “E,” “X”) is an illicit drug that is commonly taken at nightclubs and dance parties.

Address correspondence to Dr Joseph J. Palamar, PhD, MPH, New York University Langone Medical Center, Department of Population Health, One Park Avenue, NY 10016, USA; E-mail: [email protected]

1774

Downloaded by [106.69.84.237] at 10:03 30 October 2015

ECSTASY USE AMONG US HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS

month. However, it should be noted that reported use in the last year was highest (3.4%) for 15-year olds (Miller et al., 2012). In 2012, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), which provides national data on tobacco, alcohol, and drug use in the US, indicated that 2% of 12–17year olds and 12.9% of 18–25-year olds reported lifetime use of ecstasy, and 1.2% and 4.1%, respectively, had reported past year use (SAMHSA, 2013a). Additionally, data from the NSDUH suggest that females are more likely to use ecstasy compared to males (Wu et al, 2010a). Further, according to Monitoring the Future (MTF), an annual representative survey of high school seniors in the US (modal age = 18), rates of recent ecstasy use among seniors have fluctuated rather dramatically since the late 1990s, with a spike in annual prevalence in 2001 to 9.2%, and a steep decrease through 2005 to 3%; use has increased again in recent years (e.g., to 5.3% in 2011) (Johnston et al., 2013a). Similar trends over the years were also reported in the NSDUH and the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2012; SAMHSA, 2013). Lifetime use of ecstasy among high school seniors also increased to 8% in 2011 according to MTF. Although rates of lifetime ecstasy use are higher in young adults (ages 19–28), and the average age of initiation is age 20 (e.g., 20.3 years in 2013 as per the NSDUH) (SAMHSA, 2013a), recent ecstasy use (annual prevalence) among high school seniors and 18-year olds tends to be higher than among older young adults (e.g., age 23 and older), placing high school seniors and/or 18-year olds at high risk for initiation and current use (Johnston et al., 2013a, 2013b). The popularity of ecstasy can be attributed to its unique subjective effects, including feelings of empathy, intimacy, personal closeness, friendliness, and sensuality (Bedi, Hyman, & de Wit, 2010; Palamar, Kiang, Storholm, & Halkitis, 2012; Parrott, 2013; Verheyden, Maidment, & Curran, 2003). The immediate physical effects of ecstasy include tachycardia, increased blood pressure, increased body temperature, thermal stress and overheating, jaw clenching and tooth grinding, and feelings of dehydration (Liechtei, Gamma, & Vollenwei, 2001; Parrott, 2013; Topp, Hando, Dillon, Roche, & Solowij, 1999). Shortand long-term effects include depression and anxiety, and memory impairments and problems in higher executive functioning (Liechti et al., 2001; Parott, 2013; Parrott et al., 2011). Ecstasy is also often taken in a polydrug context (Halkitis, Palamar, & Mukherjee, 2007; Sindicich & Burns, 2012), which may increase the chances of adverse effects associated with use. Alarmingly, emergency department mentions in the US involving ecstasy have also risen in recent years, from 3.5 per 100,000 in 2004 to 7.2 per 100,000 in 2011 (Drug Abuse Warning Network, 2011). Emergency department visits increased in particular among individuals younger than 21 years of age between 2005 and 2011 by 128% (SAMHSA, 2013b). Recent increases in prevalence have coincided with a rise in use of the new nickname for ecstasy, “Molly,”

1775

which is commonly used in popular culture and by users particularly in the US (Duterte, Jacinto, Sales, & Murphy, 2009; Kahn, Ferraro, & Benveniste, 2012; National Institute on Drug Abuse [NIDA], 2013). “Molly,” which is powder MDMA, named after the word “molecular,” is often perceived to be a purer and safer version of MDMA (Duterte et al., 2009; Kahn et al., 2012). The recent rise in prevalence of ecstasy may also be associated with increasing popularity of electronic dance music (EDM) events in the US. In addition, ecstasy has become associated with hip hop music, and many hip hop, rap, and mainstream music lyrics also refer to Molly use (Boeri, Sterk, & Elifson, 2004; Diamond, Bermudex, & Schensul, 2006; Lee, Battle, Soller, & Brandes, 2011), suggesting a potential recent shift in sociodeomographic characteristics of users. Few research studies have examined correlates of ecstasy use among representative samples of adolescents approaching young adulthood. Most studies of club drug use have focused on targeted samples of nightclub attendees, drug users, and gay and bisexual individuals. Research is needed to examine more recent sociodemographic predictors of use in representative samples, as smaller studies now suggest recent shifts in use of ecstasy; for example, a recent epidemiological report suggests increases in prevalence of use among Blacks in some US cities (Community Epidemiology Work Group [CEWG], 2012). This area of research will allow for targeted prevention efforts and focused attempts at preventing initiation of ecstasy in high-risk groups of adolescents. This study examines self-reported recent ecstasy use and associated correlates among a representative sample of high school seniors. METHODS Sample and Study Procedures

MTF is an annual cross-sectional survey of high school seniors in approximately 130 public and private schools throughout 48 states in the US. Roughly 15,000 high school seniors are assessed annually (Johnston et al., 2013a). Schools are selected through a multistage random sampling procedure—geographic areas are selected, then schools within areas are selected, and then students within schools are selected. MTF protocols were approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. Since MTF assesses a variety of constructs, content is divided into six questionnaire forms, which are distributed randomly. All forms assess sociodemographic variables, and use of various other drugs; however, ecstasy is only assessed in survey forms 3 and 4. The current paper examines aggregated (and weighted) data from 26,504 high school seniors from years 2007–2012 as this time frame captures most recent trends of use. Measures

Students were asked their sex, age (