An Input-Output/System Dynamics approach to ecological-economic ...

14 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
To link an Input-output (I-O) model to a System Dynamics (SD) model in order to build an ecological-economic model that: – Benefits from the dynamic properties ...
AN INPUT-OUTPUT ECONOMIC MODEL INTEGRATED WITHIN A SYSTEM DYNAMICS ECOLOGICAL MODEL: A METHODOLOGY FOR FEEDBACK LOOP APPLIED TO FISH NURSERY RESTORATION

MATEO CORDIER, TAKURO UEHARA, BERTRAND HAMAIDE, JEFFREY WEIH

M

Objectives • To link an Input-output (I-O) model to a System Dynamics (SD) model in order to build an ecological-economic model that: – – – –

Benefits from the dynamic properties of SD Benefits from the detailed economic structures of I-O Captures the complexity of an ecological-economic system Incorporates feedback loops between the ecosystem and the economic system – Reverses Isard’s (1968) model types: we model the economic system within the ecosystem (not the contrary), as one of the ecosystem’s components.  This way, interactions inside the ecosystem can be covered in a dynamic way, which is very rare in ecological-economic models (and especially in environmental I-O models)

• Apply the model to the Seine Estuary, France 2

M

Motivation (1) 1) Environmentally Extended Input-Output models (I-O) capture detailed economic structures but not fully the dynamics: • Constant technical coefficients; Lack of feedback loops • Investments and household consumption are given exogenously : profits and incomes earned in year t-1 do not influence respectively investments and household consumptions in year t • Environmental variables entered in the I-O model are static and evolve linearly

3

T

Motivation (2) 2)

System Dynamics (SD) models capture the complex behavior of a system such as nonlinear dynamics and feedbacks but is not suited for detailed (disaggregated) structures such as an economy

SD models are a computer-aided approach to solving a system of nonlinear first-order differential equations

Population Net Birth Rate +

+

R

Code for the model:

Food per Capita Fractional Birth Rate +

B

+

Food

Population = INTEGRAL(Net Birth Rate, Populationt0) Net Birth Rate = Population*Fractional Birth Rate Fractional Birth Rate =f(Food per Capita) Food per Capita = Food/Population

Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics. Irwin-McGraw-Hill.

T

Motivation (3) • With a SD tool, it is technically possible to integrate SD and I-O  It is highly compatible with other tools: it can be synchronized with SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Excel, GIS, etc.  Aim: to build a dynamic model (SD property) with detailed economic structure (I-O property)

M

Study Area: The Seine Estuary • The nursery area for sole has been decreasing due to economic activities Nursery areas (km2) 190 181.91 180 170

160 150 140

139.67 127.94

130

122.77

120 110 Years

111.74

100 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source: Cuvilliez et al. (2008)

Nurseries are a natural habitat that has been continually destroyed since 1834 by the construction of dykes and harbour extensions for maritime transport, and by the Normandy bridge.

Source of data: Rochette et al. (2010)

Evolution of nursery areas of the internal part of the Seine estuary 6

T

Two components interacting in the Model Surrounding ecosystem (SD modelling on Powersim®)

Impact of supply (= f(catch)) and income (= f(GDP)) on prices of sole fish

Nursery areas Restoration rate

Destruction rate

Common soles total

Restoration Policy Age 1 common soles Abundance Multiplier

Catch Rate

Common soles Natural Mortality Rate

Converter to kg Aging in Catch Rate Catch in the internal area Fractional Catch Rate

Economic component (I-O on Excel®)

Aging out Natural Mortality Rate Fractional Natural Mortality Rate

Final Demand for Sole (= Catch) Nursery area restored Restaurant/transport/hotel services sold to recreational fishermen (to be included in forthcoming work)

Household income variation 7

M

The economic component (I-O equations on Excel)

2. Salaries and dividends  when estuary companies invest in nursery restoration

such as investors

3. Household purchasing power (payments for goods and services)  with investments in nursery restoration

1. Final consumption  with investments in nursery restoration

8

T

The Surrounding ecosystem Total surface of high density areas

Total surface of nursery areas

(SD modelling on Powersim)

Nursery areas Total surface area restored

Restoration rate

Destruction rate

Abundance Multiplier

Restoration Policy

Common soles total Age 1 common soles Sole stock internal of the Seine

Sole stock external of the Seine Fishing quota

Delay Time Weight converter

Aging in Caught in the internal area Catch Rate

Catchable stock Export rate Sole exports

Catch Rate

Adjusted Fractional Catch Rate Weight of Common soles from the internal area

Intermediate rate Total demand Change in demand Intermediate allow ed for the internal area Reference Fractional domestic Catch Rate consumptions

Final domestic demand for sole fish

Natural Mortality Rate Aging out Natural Mortality Rate Fractional Natural Mortality Rate

Economic component (I-O sub-model in Excel)

M

How the economic system (I-O) is embedded within the ecosystem modeling (SD)?

Five variables are endogenised in a dynamic way: their value depends on the results given by the model in previous year.

Two feedback impacts are simulated in the model:

Ecosystem

Impact

Feedback Impact

Economy

T

Simulation results over 2007 – 2020 With restoration of 23.7km2 (2007-2017)

Without nursery restoration

km 2 2 Km

k Km m2 2

128

128

Total surface of high density areas

Total surface of high density areas

Nursery areas in the Seine Estuary

124 120 116 112 108 104 100 1/1/2007

1/1/2011

1/1/2015

1/1/2019

124 120 116 112 108 104 100 1/1/2007

1/1/2011

Non-commercial use only!

1/1/2015

1/1/2019

Non-commercial use only!

Population of soles originating from the Seine estuary Number ls of individua 6,700,000

individuals

Numberlsof individua 6,700,000

Common soles total

6,500,000

total

6,300,000 6,100,000 5,900,000 5,700,000 1/1/2007

1/1/2011

1/1/2015

1/1/2019

individuals

6,500,000 6,300,000 6,100,000 5,900,000 5,700,000 1/1/2007

1/1/2011

1/1/2015

1/1/2019

M

Simulation results over 2007 – 2020

Catch of soles fish base 100 = 2007 (%)

Catch of soles in the Eastern channel (zone VIId) by fishermen from the Seine estuary 105 103.8 With nursery restoration 104 103 Without nursery restoration 103.2 102 101 100 99 Years 98 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

GDP base 100 = 2007 (%)

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the Seine estuary (region Haute-Normandie) With nursery restoration

120.7 119.0

118 Without nursery restoration 114 110 106 102 98 Years 94 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

06/02/1994 18/09/1994 30/04/1995 10/12/1995 21/07/1996 02/03/1997 12/10/1997 24/05/1998 03/01/1999 15/08/1999 26/03/2000 05/11/2000 17/06/2001 27/01/2002 08/09/2002 20/04/2003 30/11/2003 11/07/2004 20/02/2005 02/10/2005 14/05/2006 24/12/2006 05/08/2007 16/03/2008 26/10/2008 07/06/2009 17/01/2010 29/08/2010 10/04/2011 20/11/2011 01/07/2012 10/02/2013 22/09/2013

Sole price (€/kg)

T

Retro-validation of the I-O/SD model Price of sole fish per kilogram

17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5

Calculated by the I-O/SD model

Observed data

R2 = 0.52

𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑡 = 𝑒 −4.488086793 × 𝑉𝐴𝑡−1 0.777322352

× 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑐ℎ𝑡 −0.130727997 13

Acknowledgments We would like to thank Olivier Le Pape, Benoit Archambault and Etienne Rivot from Agrocampus Ouest in France (UMR ESE). Thanks also to Thomas Poitelon from Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (CEARC) in France. This study has been funded by the Sumitomo Foundation, the Asahi Glass Foundation, the Yamada Fund for Scientific Research, and the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Japan.

Suggest Documents