An international comparison of nutrition education standards

4 downloads 0 Views 775KB Size Report
standards and ii) national nutrition occupational standards and scopes of practice for personal. 27 trainers within ICREPs affiliated countries. Content analysis of ...
1

1

Running title: Nutrition standards in personal training.

2 3 4

Title: An international comparison of nutrition education standards, occupational standards and scopes of practice for personal trainers.

5 6

Original Research Article

7 8

Authors:

9

K. Barnes* (APD, MNutr&Diet) a,b, L. Ball (APD, PhD) a,b, B. Desbrow (APD, PhD) a,b

10 11

a.

12 13

b.

School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, 4222, Australia. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, 4222, Australia.

14 15

*

16

Contact email: [email protected]

Corresponding Author: Katelyn Barnes.

17 18 19

Word count: 3814

2

20

Abstract

21

Personal trainers are well placed to provide nutrition care in line with their recommended

22

scope of practice. However, providing nutrition care beyond their recommended scope of

23

practice has been identified as an industry risk. The International Confederation of Registers

24

for Exercise Professionals (ICREPs) have international standards for nutrition knowledge and

25

skills that are recommended for all fitness professionals, including personal trainers. This

26

study investigates whether the ICREPs standards align with i) national nutrition education

27

standards and ii) national nutrition occupational standards and scopes of practice for personal

28

trainers within ICREPs affiliated countries. Content analysis of each standard and/or scope of

29

practice was undertaken to extract nutrition statements. Extracted statements were matched

30

with nutrition components of the ICREPs standards to result in a score based on the number

31

of aligned ICREPs knowledge and skills criteria. Ten countries, with 16 organisations, were

32

identified as being involved in the development of national education standards, occupational

33

standards or scopes of practice for personal trainers. The educational and occupational

34

standards varied widely amongst countries and had minimal alignment with the ICREPs

35

standards. As such, the expected role of personal trainers in providing nutrition care appeared

36

to differ between countries. Further work is required to support personal trainers to develop a

37

level of knowledge and skills that enables the provision of safe, consistent and effective

38

nutrition care.

39

Keywords: Nutrition, health promotion, personal trainers, occupational standards

3

40

Introduction

41

Personal trainers are a large workforce of fitness professionals who are well placed to provide

42

a combination of physical activity instruction and nutrition care for healthy individuals and

43

groups (Oprescu, 2012; De Lyon et al, 2016). Personal trainers may positively influence

44

dietary behaviours and subsequent health outcomes of clients through the provision of

45

nutrition care (Barnes et al., 2016a; Barnes et al., 2016b; De Lyon et al., 2016; Oprescu,

46

2012). Nutrition care refers to any practice conducted by a professional in an attempt to

47

facilitate improvements in an individuals’ dietary behaviours (Ball et al., 2012); and therefore

48

encompasses all interactions around nutrition such as nutrition advice, nutrition counselling,

49

nutrition education, conversations about nutrition and even nutrition related social media

50

postings. Some aspects of nutrition care, such as dietary prescription and medical nutrition

51

therapy, are complex and require specialised knowledge. Such examples of complex nutrition

52

care are therefore considered to be inappropriate for personal trainers to provide due to a

53

perceived lack of competence (Paul et al., 2014; Kruskall et al. 2017). Providing

54

inappropriate nutrition care has been identified as an industry risk, due to the potential for

55

negative client health outcomes (Keyzer et al., 2014; Paul et al., 2014; Kruskall et al. 2017).

56

Clearly, strategies that facilitate personal trainers to develop nutrition knowledge and skills to

57

provide safe and effective nutrition care, that is appropriate for their role, should be explored.

58

Development of competence is usually supported through formal education and can be

59

guided by competence models that align professional expectations of roles and

60

responsibilities (Verma et al., 2006; Wise, 2008). In 2013, the International Confederation of

61

Registers for Exercise Professionals (ICREPs) developed a competence model through a set

62

of “Global Standards” for fitness professionals, including personal trainers (ICREPs, 2013).

63

The Global Standards provide guidance on the development or reform of national standards

64

for fitness professionals, underpinned by knowledge and skills required for safe and effective

65

practice (ICREPs, 2013). The Global Standards include two components on nutrition

66

specifically for personal trainers: C3. weight management and D3. The promotion of healthy

67

eating and physical activity (ICREPs, 2013). However, it is unclear if the nutrition

68

components of the Global Standards have been incorporated into national policies including

69

education standards, scopes of practice, or occupational standards for personal trainers. Given

70

that personal trainers are registered and trained nationally, incorporating global standards into

71

national industry documents is important to develop and maintain consistent expectations and

4

72

competence for personal trainers. This is especially pertinent as personal trainers have

73

reciprocal practice across ICREPs associated countries.

74

A review of policies for both nutrition education and practice guidelines of personal trainers

75

would help to identify whether the Global Standards have been incorporated into the current

76

regulatory environment in which personal trainers practice. A comparison of education

77

policies may help to identify if personal trainers are supported to develop competence in

78

nutrition care. In addition, a comparison of occupation specific policies may provide insight

79

into appropriate boundaries for personal trainers with regard to nutrition care. The results of a

80

policy review may help to inform and support future development and planning of national

81

and international regulation for nutrition care provided by personal trainers. Therefore, this

82

paper aims to (i) compare the nutrition components in formal education guidelines for

83

personal trainers across ICREPs recognised countries and (ii) compare nutrition components

84

within formal occupational guidelines for personal trainers to the ICREPs competence model.

85

Methods

86

A scoping review identified all nutrition guidelines for personal trainers from countries who

87

have a registration body recognised as a full member of ICREPs in 2016. Institutional ethical

88

approval was not required for this study. Figure 1 outlines the four steps undertaken to

89

complete this review. The review was conducted independently by researchers from an

90

Australian University who are not involved in the national registration or competency

91

standards for personal trainers.

92 93

>Insert Figure 1 about here
Insert Table 1 about here
Insert Table 2 about here
Insert Table 3 about here