8
Q
$, : !; () LA Y , < 0 , h< F ( ")*
+
= =
: 0 98 } : 0 98 }
.
8/->? ; 3
D E =DF - =m - C1D 0 98/->?
1 7 3 5 - 5 2 0 6 ( ? b) ? 6 2 0 0 8 -5 5 8 3 ( \ - \U ) ? 6 ISC
SCOPUS 7LISA
' !
http:// jist.irandoc.ac.ir
166 - 145
| 1 [ 6 | 26 0 1389 i ? ! " :'< d g
23 }
0 1:
-_
:
?
./5.
./
. 1:
*
:
,- 28 - 0 - ; 5: u3K
.D \ ;3 .FT
17.8
: 5U `
: . 23.
. ? G/->.? u
- =
:
/0 98
. 1...: 0 ..
M. . .6
-_ .I .
, C- E.D
I
6
- ./ , J.K - .=
:
.8
- .‹U1
./5.
. I 5.7 -0,1. 5. /
1.9U
I
/0 98 19U a
./5
? G/->? u
..D \ ;3 ..FT :
5
1...6 g 1...F
I C 7 5D
. .6 0 f
/0
-
-_ I
178
1. 1 J.
17.8 M .: .D
: ‡=
/
G/->? : 5< F 8 G/->?
D FT
/0,1
- ; .. R
1 -
=^ ;- f ; 3
J: l , -
178
..k , ( , - . 8
R= 5: - ‹U1
R= - /
-; R
8 M =bh/ w
../5..8
.R 5 R: - K n D FT [,1 :
/58
1. 5: 5 /
.R C1.D ) ].D d
..: h ..
.
:
/ G 1n /5 ? H->? u 5 I . - f .: - .‹U1 ; . 3 1.. - .R .I
1. . M : .=: . -
- =
178 , f 236 G/->?
D \ ;3 FT
- . = - .= 45. ? C1.D 4 ..I ]..D d J..
A
1388/07/04 : ,
1 - R
. ? . . _
Rd ED
./0 98
M .: M .=j / , - .
? F
: 1. E. 1 , 0 f . J: l E =8 ? ( K 66/95)
1.9U 0 .6 . … J. ƒ . < ` - 0 . . .i . .0
-
=6
0 9...8 -
- 5 =.8 ? ,
M. E.D
2
: 5: L G/->? :: ;C
E
5.: 1388-1387 D .FT P- P . h . 158 ..
. -
1388/12/24 :j q
1. ,_ . , .? . - .‹U1 ; . 3 -
Q+
6 a =6
23 -
.: 1.n M.
g)*
1 - R 19U 5
: - D FT
[email protected] @:
-_
/
?*
1 / !& | 26 /
| 1389 ? @
' d .1
. /, 0 1.. / . R . . I . 5 . 8b - . /, - . /0 . 9 , . R . / . . - I ., .8 : /5 = H3 /, -_ : : 1I 1I @ .6 4 .=/… - .R .6 4 .R . T , 5 n : M\ 3 /, . .3 ./, 5. . , M : =: .(1385 0 =? - 1 ) 6 : D FT - s T 1.n 1n 5: ; 3 ,4 _ :, 1 ; 3 1 - R ? - 4 16 xd8 .L 1.k= 5: ; 3 = / 17 R « 1RD -» .(149 41386 0 =? - ) = _ - ‘ .(Wilson 2000) = ] ^ : 23 1 - R n / - . 0 1.: . 23. 0,1. 9.8/->? 5. 1 1. G .? . , R : 23 : , . . 0 . 5.i ].D d ./ \ - =< : 5= , M 1n /19U V / ^ k=< K ./19U 5.: 1. . 0 6u s k=< K 1 , 1= 5 : 23 /19U M h 4 3 2 1 .(1385 0 =? - 1 ) 1 0 6 «M \D: -» 4 «M - » 4 «- ‹U1 « 4 «X U « 4« 1RD -»
I 19U » 5 19U M . : 23 /19U M , \ - ‹U1 19U .6,1 _ .s T =. E. d: : :ƒ 16 0 «5; 3 1 - R . . G.` . = 0,- . 1. - M. .: .(Kuhlthau 1991) . 0 .6 . , ; 3 5 : . = , : D \ ;3 FT 178 ƒ K1Fn 4 : 23 = ; 3 5 ==\ : = / M\ == 1 - R = r 1. - : , 0- I - M \ U^ - f , 4 == 1 - R 5 d: .9 .\ 5.: \ , ƒ~1 ^ == 1 - R 5 d: ; 3 5 : . : . .: 1. M. . 4 .== ? 4 1 - M : . 1 = J` R - ‹U1 19U 5 =^ M : M . `: s - ‹U1 19U : , 7 I @T - 4«1 6» 1bh/ 98/->? - , X? .(Byron 1999) \ 5 d: /@ T , 5. . 57 M 5: - = n ? = : 19U M : 5: « U» - « U /» . . = ; . 3 1. - .R 5.: 5. .: . 5.: : . : 1 19U M .(Shamo 2001; Holliday and Li 2004) , ? .I 1..9U . : W . < - . ‹U1 . /G/->..? 5.. . M.. . 9 : J.. q 5.. \ .: Q o. 1 41.9U M. a . .: 0 .6 C .7 ./G/->.? .‹ - ; 3 1 - R 1. Kuhlthau 4. Belkin
2. Ellis 3. Dervin 5. Model of Information Search Process
146
? F
| 8
Q+
Q
g)*
$,
(Davis 1992; Loerke 1992; Swain 1996; Byron 1999; Ödlund 2000; Shamo
. 0 .6 .
2001; Jones 2002; Kracker 2002; Spink et al 2002; Van Kampen 2003; Holliday and Li
- .= b 17.8 1. 23 4 17.8 1. 23.
:W< « U» G/->? 5 U -f : C 9=/ 5 8 .(Li 2002) I k
.2004; Bulic 2006) = @T : D „=/ •q :
- . ? - .‹U1 19U , 178 : 23 _ 5 R xd8 M 1.9U 5. 5.j _ .: 5: .8 ./5.8 - ; . R 17.8 M _ 5 M 9 - ’ = ./5.8 - ; . R M. _ 5 R xd8 M =j / ’ == 5: 7 4 0 6 ] K1 - ‹U1 ’ ;- f ]D d D FT /0,1 178 M =bh/ , 178 M
'+
.2
n =.6 4(; . R ) f . : . . 5.s 5 , J\8 : 23 I «- ‹U1 » 1. - .R .I 1.9U E. IG.6 J. 4 - [ ` 5: .( /G= ) \ - ( /58 ) 6 5 4 3 E.s 5 ( 5i - -_ I 4 =:; 1K 4 ]8 42{ d 14M , Q_ I ) ; 3 .(Kuhlthau 1991) 16 0 RI 0 6 . 1983 U . . - 5.U < G/->? w=? a : - ‹U1 5D G6 19U .: 5 1: 0 6 C 7 ^ < s T - Vb1 R ` G/->? M U- . 0 6 5i 1991 M XY . 6 7= ; 3 1 - R I 19U 7 5: - J \ 1 ; ^U s G/->.? 1.9U M. - ‹U1 45 . I l 1 ,_ 1 U1 G/->? 19U . .l = :, .: 1 _ /J DT - Š 6- , 0 f : o ` M. . 1.: 0 .6 C .7 .^l - 5. d: : . .: ^l1 /G/->? M E / , 5 . n : . 3 , . . 5.: 0 .6 J T 3 , 5: 19d ? 8 : /G/->? - U .. H,1.. _ ../5..R z 4 ../0 9..8 17..8 19d.. ? . .. 1: 0 •.. ? 7 G/->.? M .n_ . . 5 3 5U ` : 5 1: : ,1 _G D|.6 . .Fd6 ;3\.8 1. 5. d: : 4 I == 6 K 50 ƒ < ` .(Kuhlthau 1991) 1: a . 1.= 5.: 1.9U M. , 5 n ? 19U M 4«M 1. » 4«t 1.U» 4«X 1. » 5.: 1. . . _ E.D 1. Initiation 5. Collection
147
2. Selection 6. Presentation
: 5: R: 98/->? 1= , 5. . 0 0 f G 1n G/->?
3. Exploration 7.Term paper
4. Formulation
1 / !& | 26 /
4« .U» - «
U /» 4«MY
-» 4
| 1389 ? @
9 - «V= Y » 4«
» 4« 1 » 4«1 6» 4« =U _» 4« - :» (Davis 1992; Loerke 1992; Swain 1996; Byron 1999; Ödlund 1 0 6 « RU_» - 4«V U1 :» 2000; Shamo 2001; Jones 2002; Kracker 2002; Spink et al 2002; Van Kampen 2003;
C
ƒ< ` 60 6 G?5 1 / U- .Holliday and Li 2004; Bulic 2006; Aalst 2007) •q 5: 5 1 : M : =: . 0 6 C 7 : Q o 1 ( RU_ G/->? =‹ 5:) /G/->? M 178 19U M : D: l :; - L : 23 9=/ 5 . \6_ . - - = : /0 98 D \ ;3 FT 178 _ :G/->? DK G ? .I 1.9U 0 .6 . J. . / G 1.n ./5. . ? .8/->? u . E I J. _ .: ‡ .= ./5.8 - ; . R - .== - ‹U1 ; 3 1 - R ’ =/ 8 - ‹U1 19U M
J.
.: @< . ; . R .k , , - . .D \ ;3 .FT 17.8 . 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R I ]D d ; . R .k , ].D d D .FT ./0,1. D \ ;3 FT 178 . 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R I ]D d J : @< J. .: h . ./5.8 .k , , - . D \ ;3 FT 178 . 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R I ]D d ./5.8 .k , ].D d D .FT /0,1 D \ ;3 FT 178 . 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R I ]D d J :h :
O Y/ & M
' G , .3
.1 .2 .3 .4
j
.4
C . J . 6 G/->..? M.. . _ 5..^ . . . D DT 21.. , - . 8 ? G/->..? H. _E. . ? G/->.? u 5 - - = : /0 98 6 =6 178 . _ E.^ . 1.: 0 .6 g 1.F / 9R8 M 1388 -1387 D FT P P- P h ? [, P- a : 5 1 ^ M : =: . 1: : 1 0 98 - 178 610 - J 6 . =6 17.8 , .f 236 .^ (109 41382 . ) « .I 1 - .R » 5 1 - 5^ . I M ^ ( f 176) - 0 98 - ( f 60) = : 0 98 1k= 1 6 , C- E.D - 5 =.8 ? , .Rd E.D : I C 7 5D G/->? M
148
? F
Q+
| 8
Q
g)*
$,
.F . I5. 1 H- , .Rd E.D . .6 0 f . ./0 -_ .I : 5< F D .FT ./0,1. . : 1. E.^ .k 1. ; .`< . .6 0 f .? I E =8 ?» 1= : « » E =8 ? , _ (; . R ) f . ./5.0/05) R . 1 =^ ;- f J , C •/ .k , ].D d D .FT ./0,1. .D \ ;3 FT 178 :2 ' G , 8 3O . 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R I ]D d J : @< ; R M 9 . - .6 0 f . 5. V. X . - J. DT 1. ,_ , 5 L M : 1k= 5: . b 17.8 . 5. I 1 5: - ‹U1 19U ]D d J : @< ; R ; 5. I l 1 ,_ 1 , - 8 - 4 = - = 45 ? C1D 4 R C1D D FT [,1 ;- .f h.86 E.D a R 1 = / 8 /5 . 0 _ 7 P_w - (p=0/045) 1. - 0/05 vs. 0,1 b 178 ; M 9 M : =^ 0 / .8 ;- .f 0,1. . b 17.8 ; . M 9 . . / ‡ 5 =b / J .(p>0/05) R =^ _ Œ TU 5: - f M 5 fI 1 %95 = : U- 16 C . . .=^ ;- .f 1..6 xd..8 5.. M.. . : h..86 5..D a .R 1.. 5. 1 .: . 5 I =b 5R ` / 1 ,_ , \ 5 4 6 0 f M\ 1 ,_ , /0,1 5. ? C1D [,1 M : =^ ;- f 45D M a R 1 6 xd8 (8 P- ) /5 5: . R C1D - , - 8 /0,1 :
154
? F
83
8
V
| 8
Q+
J $V UH
(
Q
g)*
H ( !
( 1
8 3O (
-0/02
pvalue
'
0/893
155
3O
T
p-value
0/893
151/73
-0/135
0/13
0/331
151
0/975
0/13
0/325
151/28
0/988
-0/02
0/869
151
-0/165
0/869
150/20
-0/167
0/08
0/493
149
0/688
0/494
142/85
0/686
0/10
0/313
153
1/012
0/309
150/17
1/021
0/20
0/133
148
1/509
.: h .
./58
k , ,. 1 -
1. Levene 's test
155
1/40
-
P- 5D
-
0 6Ž : : /X : : /X
aR -
C- 5D
2/801
-
0 6Ž : : /X
aR -
C1 5D
0 8Ž : : /X 0/000
-
0 6Ž : : /X
aR -
C b 5D
0 8Ž : : /X 0/000
-
0 6Ž : : /X
aR -
h7=? 5D
0 8Ž : : /X 0/218
132/77
: : /X
aR
0 8Ž
0/992 0/10
0 6Ž
: : /X
0/985 0/08
0/351
-
0 8Ž
0/96 -0/02
0 H
F
: : /X
0/239
0/139
UH
-0/135
-0/02
+e 8 3O .6
8 < 8 3O
}
0/554
0/20
$,
1/489
D \ ;3 FT =^ ;- f ; 3
1/528
-
0 6Ž : : /X
aR -
h86 5D
0 8Ž
178 :3 ' G , 8 3O 1 - R I ]D d J
1 / !& | 26 /
| 1389 ? @
- .6 0 f . J` .R 5. 1 - . 1. ,_ , 1 5 L = / 5 L M : 1k= 5: 1. , - . 17.8 5I 1 5: - ‹U1 19U ]D d J :h /58 C . b E.D E.8 1. =5 _, (9 P- ) /5 . I l 1 ,_ - (p=0/001) 1. - , - . 178 ; M 9 =^ ;- f 0/05 vs 1.6 . 0 . - .f , - . 17.8 ; . M 9 . M .: / .‡ .=b ./ J . R =^ _ Œ TU 5: /;- f M fI 1 %95 = : U- 4(p>0/05) J $V UH
(
H ( ! 'e< E
p-value
0/056
0/139
0/379
0/287
0/132
0/045
F
2/57
1/86
1/036
1/27
1/897
2/745
3O '
( LA
(
qQ g !Q
+e 8 3O .7 :3 H (
x u#+
3
6/11
153
121/15
/0- I -
156
127/26
J
3
3/71
149
99/25
/0- I -
152
102/97
J
3
1/85
149
88/64
/0- I -
152
90/49
J
3
1/78
147
68/80
/0- I -
150
70/68
J
3
2/27
151
60/30
/0- I -
154
62/57
J
3
5/30
146
94/07
/0- I -
149
99/37
J
UH
0 H
P- 5D
aR
C- 5D
aR
C1 5D
aR
/0- I M :
/0- I M :
/0- I M :
/0- I M : C b 5D
aR
h7=? 5D
aR
h86 5D
aR
/0- I M :
/0- I M :
156
? F
P &'H
0 H
J $V
LA
0/05 = 0/05)
, C . •/
.R
]D d
./0,1.
178
I ]D d J .= /
:h
/58
l 1 ,_ 1
: 1k= 5: M9
- 60 f
b
178
M9
/‡
5
_ ΠTU 5:
-f M
178 .
;
/58
D FT 0,1
178 ; /0,1
:h
5L M
=^ 0/05 vs D FT
:4 ' G , 8 3O
/58 1 -
=b / U- 4
fI 1 =^ ;- f 19U M
158
? F
J $V UH
| 8
Q+
'
0/504
0/654
0/708
0/101
0/180
0/314
F
0/786
0/542
0/464
2/109
1/650
1/195
3O '
g)*
( ! 'e< E
p-value
Q
( LA
(
$,
qQ g !Q
+e 8 3O .10 :3 H (
x u#+
3
2/32
154
151/49
/0- I -
157
153/80
J
3
0/961
152
89/83
/0- I -
155
90/79
J
3
0/341
152
37/24
/0- I -
155
37/58
J
3
3/04
152
73/60
/0- I -
156
76/64
J
3
2/98
154
92/85
/0- I -
157
95/83
J
3
2/39
153
102/03
/0- I -
156
104/42
J
UH
'
/0- I M : P- 5D
58
C- 5D
58
C1 5D
58
/0- I M :
/0- I M :
/0- I M : C b 5D
58
h7=? 5D
58
h86 5D
58
/0- I M :
/0- I M :
. r. l ; 3 gR : G/->? M C- 5D 4 6 5 fI G ? 5 1 / 5. .= I .l 5< .F 1. 19d. ? , f 32 0- I V G/->? DK G ? 1 5< F /G ? , V / 5 . 1: , 178 f 13 178 f 19 J 6 . 16 5i _ 5: W1: /5 - u s ’ 6 =6_ 1n : d 21L1 : J? M 5D - / , JK /5 ./5. . ? r. `T u . 5. .I - - = : /0 98 D \ ;3 FT ./;- .f .: - .‹U1 ; 3 1 - R I 19U 0 6 J / G 1n
161
1 / !& | 26 /
| 1389 ? @
1. - . . .8 J _ : ‡= G:-h /58 - ; R - 0 t 1.9U M. a . : 1= . 5 /G/->? , n : - ‹U1 19U 5: ? 5 = … «- ‹U1 » . .9 - « .RU_» - 4«t 1.U» G/->.? 19d.. ? - (Kuhlthau 1991) .=: : .K n Loerke 1992; Aalst et = .R . I M Gd: M 16 n 5DcR IJ\6 .K 37/5 5. . M. 9 . : 5< .F C . b G ? /0 9 1 , - 4 al. 2007) J.T M . ^ ƒ~ . 5 I 57 1 4 0 \ n 1n 21L1 I 165< F .l J.T - f J U M / 5: 6 - 1: 16 19d ? : ; < M g = . 16 0 / 8 - ‹U1 19U 5: .? _ 5. 1.nh./ «V. U1 :» G/->.? w . .: M 5 .? .I . . - 5.l3 4 .L «X 1 » G/->? 17..8 , . - . 44 - 3 U- . . /0 5..: 5.. 1 . : .. , .(Davis 1992) 21..L1 M.. ( .K 82/54) ./ _ .‹ - 40 . . =..8 ? 21..L1 ( .K 40/1)
162
? F
Q+
| 8
Q
g)*
$,
. ‡ . I 1.65< F K 37/5 9 • , . 1: 5 I =/ , =8 ? Ji .R M. . k 5: M : =: . 5 6 =6_ G 1n 21L1 : J.? M. . 4 5^ 1 - 1` 0 6 n /58 : h7=? ED - ‹U1 .6 .(5 P- . ) . 5. G/ . D? C1 E L M .: M : .=: - .6 1. - , - . 17.8 ; M 9 =^ ;- f C b .I ].D d J. .: h . ./5.8 .k , , - . D \ ;3 FT 178 . 6 1 =^ ;- f ; 3 1 - R D .FT ./0,1. D \ ;3 FT 178 M : 57 - 6 C b5L ;- .f ; . 3 1. - .R .I ].D d J. .: h . ./5.8 k , ]D d . 1. - .R .I . : . /58 D 1 5: . 6 1 =^ C .7 - .‹U1 1.9U a . : 5 /G/->? 8 : 5 I l : 1 /G/->? . : 1.: _[ JU 6 . 5 n ? 19U M f E? C 7 5 6 : /58 .. - ]..D d D ..FT ../0,1.. I1.. - ..R ../5..8 M ..: ;- ..f , .. r.. l . I ; 1K 8 : /G/->? , I1 - R
164
? F
Q+
| 8
Q
g)*
$,
, - . 17.8 ./5.8 - ; . R M .: .=^ ;- f 1 - C 21 7 5.: . 1.9U M ? - < [ =/ 8 ]D d D FT /0,1 178 M : M =j / - R 5 R: - K n D FT 0,1 - R= 5: - ‹U1 19U I 57 1 5 1 . : J: l , R= - / : - D FT /0,1 5 / u + .H : : . 5 :(2)9 4
. 23. -
.:
5 d:
. : 23
-
: 8 .
C1D
. : . 23.
.
3 , : G/->?
D W < .1386 . L
2, .7 T 40 =? -
/0 I1DI .1382 .M R
/19U J DT .1385 .0 =? - L
T 4
T - 4MRT 4
1
.152 -119 Aalst, J.V., F.W. Hing, L.S.May, and W.P.Yan. 2007. Exploring information literacy in secondary schools in Hong Kong: a case study. Library & Information Science Research 29(4): 533–552. Bulic, R. 2006. Comprehensive Secondary School Students and their Information Search Process: Information Searching: A Survey of Carol C. Kuhlthau Model. Ph.D. diss., University College of Borås. Byron, S.M. 1999. Information seeking in a virtual learning environment. Ph.D. diss., University of North Texas. Davis, S.J.1992. The Research Process of Middle School Students. PhD diss., Northern Illinois University. Holliday, W., and Q. Li. 2004. Understanding the millennials: updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review 32(4): 356-366. Jones, J.F. 2002. Searching for Patient Educational Material Using Electronic Information Resources: An Exploration of Nurses' Search Behavior. PhD diss., The University of Wisconsin – Madison. Kalbach, J. 2006. “I’m feeling lucky”: the role of emotions in seeking information on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(6): 813–818. Kracker, J. 2002. Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: an experiment. part I. effect of teaching Kuhlthau’s ISP model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(4): 282–294. Kracker, J., and P.Wang. 2002. Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: an experiment. part II. content analysis of their writings on two experiences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(4): 295–307. Kuhlthau, C.C. 1991. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5): 361–371. Li, N. 2002. Culture and Gender Aspects of Students' Information Searching Behavior Using the Internet: A Two-culture Study of China and the United Kingdom. PhD diss., Open University. Loerke, K.1992. An Understanding of How Junior High School Students Experience the Library Research Process. MEd diss., University of Alberta. Ödlund, E. 2000. ISP and Thesis: A Qualitative Study of the ISP by Kuhlthau among University Students in their Thesis Course. PhD diss. University College of Borås. Shamo, E. E. 2001. University Students and the Internet: Information Seeking Study. PhD diss., University of North Texas. Spink, A., T.D. Wilson, N. Ford, A. Foster, and D. Ellis. 2002. Information seeking and mediated searching. part 2. uncertainty and its. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(9): 704-714.
165
1 / !& | 26 /
| 1389 ? @
Swain, D.E. 1996. Information search process model: how freshmen begin research. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 33: 95-99. Van Kampen, D. J. 2003. Library anxiety, the information search process and doctoral use of the library. EdD diss., University of Central Florida. Wilson, T.D. 2000. Human information behavior. Informing Science 3(2): 49-55.
166
An Investigation on Informationn A S Seeking Behaviors of Graduatee S Students in Birjand and Ferdowsi wsi U Universities on the basis of K Kuhlthau Model of Informationn S Search Process Mehdi Narmenji M M MLIS, Birjand University Mohsen Nowkarizi* M P PhD in Library and Information Science A Asst. Prf., Birjand University Iranian Research Institute For Science and Technology (IRANDOC) ISSN 1735-5206 eISSN 2008-5583 Indexed in LISA, SCOPUS & ISC
Vol.26 | No.1 | pp: 145-166 Autumn 2010
Abstract: This paper is an attempt to study information seeking A ng b behaviors of graduate students in Birjand and Ferdowsi universities ities bas based o Kuhlthau model of Information Search Process. The population on tion c consists of graduate students in Birjand and Ferdowsi universities es whose p proposals were approved by graduate study councils of mentioned ed u universities up to the end of first semester of 2008-2009 academic ic year. F Finally, 158 usable questionnaires (%66.95) of under study sample ple were c collected. This research was carried out in two parts. Data was collected by a questionnaire in the first part and through interview in the second cond part. F Findings of both parts (through questionnaire and interview) reveal veal that in t process of preparing their proposals, the graduate students of both the u universities went through the same stages mentioned in Kuhlthau au model o Information Search Process with minor differences, and they indicated of c corresponding feelings and thoughts approximate to those in stages ages of K Kuhlthau model. The results did not generally show any significant cant d difference among men and women's feelings and thoughts, nor among d different areas of study. Therefore, it can be concluded that Kuhlthau hlthau m model is not dependent on special gender or study area, and it iss applicable f all areas of study and both genders. for
* *Corresponding Author:
[email protected]
viii
