An updated review of Zika virus

16 downloads 0 Views 557KB Size Report
Sep 27, 2016 - Larocca RA, Abbink P, Peron JPS, Paolo M de A, Iampietro MJ, Badamchi-Zadeh A, et. 5 ... Right circle indicates viral transmission in Cape. 4.
Accepted Manuscript Title: An updated review of Zika virus Author: Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk Ahmed Negida Hussien Ahmed PII: DOI: Reference:

S1386-6532(16)30545-5 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.012 JCV 3701

To appear in:

Journal of Clinical Virology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

15-3-2016 27-9-2016 30-9-2016

Please cite this article as: Abushouk Abdelrahman Ibrahim, Negida Ahmed, Ahmed Hussien.An updated review of Zika virus.Journal of Clinical Virology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

An updated review of Zika virus

1

Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk1, 2, Ahmed Negida3, 4, 5, Hussien

2

Ahmed3, 4, 5

3

1

Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

4

2

NovaMed Medical Research Association, Cairo, Egypt

5

3

Medical Research Group of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt

6

4

Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, El-Sharkia, Egypt

7

5

Student Research Unit, Zagazig University, Zagazig, El-Sharkia, Egypt

8 9

Correspondence to: Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk; Faculty of Medicine, Ain

10

Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Postal code 11566; Tel: +201014295780; Email:

11

[email protected]

12 13

1

HIGHLIGHTS

2

1. RT PCR of urine samples seem to be the most reliable diagnosis for ZIKV. 2. A recent report described successful treatment by intravenous Xiyanping. 3. Vector control is the most effect prevention against ZIKV. 4. Future research should develop broad spectrum antivirals. 5. The association between ZIKV and microcephaly needs further investigation.

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Abstract

1

The current outbreak of Zika virus (ZIKV) in South America is one of the most

2

serious public health emergencies since the Ebola outbreak of West Africa (2014).

3

ZIKV belongs to flaviviridae family and has two lineages (Asian and African). The

4

virus was first discovered in Uganda (1947) and the first human infection was

5

identified in Nigeria (1952). The current epidemic is the third of its type after that of

6

Yap Island, Micronesia (2007) and French Polynesia (2013). Phylogenetic studies

7

revealed that the current strain shares about 99.7% of nucleotides and 99.9% of amino

8

acids with the strain of French Polynesia epidemic (2013), suggesting that it has

9

spread across the Pacific Ocean to invade South America. Aedes Aegypti mosquito is

10

the main vector for ZIKV and there are some reports describing possible sexual and

11

maternal to fetal transmission. ZIKV infection is known to be self-limited. However,

12

recent reports suggested that it can be associated with neurological manifestations as

13

Guillan-Barrè Syndrome and microcephaly in the newborn population. Currently,

14

vector control seems to be the most effective available preventive measure against

15

ZIKV spread. The development of broad spectrum antivirals and ZIKV vaccines

16

should be a priority of future research.

17

Keywords

18

Zika virus; Epidemic; Public health; Microcephaly

19 20

1 2

1. Zika Virus Morphology

3

ZIKV is a predominantly single RNA stranded virus, belonging to the flaviviridae

4

family (1,2), a viral family in which the yellow fever virus is considered the

5

prototype, most lethal and most historically relevant member. Zika virus (ZIKV) is a

6

positive-sense RNA virus with a 10.7-kb genome encoding a single polyprotein that is

7

cleaved into three structural proteins (C, PrM/M, and E) and seven nonstructural

8

proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5) (3).

9

It is believed that the virus initially developed in Uganda probably between 1892 and

10

1943. Phylogenetic studies indicated the presence of two lineages of ZIKV: the Asian

11

and African lineages (1). In 2007, the full length of ZIKV genome was identified and

12

published (4) and till then, the virus was primarily infecting wild primates causing

13

sporadic "Spillover" infections in humans. However, it is believed that the virus

14

recently adapted to humans by losing an NS1 codon of its genome (5).

15

2. Historical Overview

16

During a research on jungle yellow fever virus in ZIKA forest, Uganda 1947, a rhesus

17

monkey contracted an arthropod borne virus that was later isolated and identified as

18

ZIKV. However, it was not reported in humans until 1952 when it was first detected

19

in Nigeria (6). All over the following 60 years, it was known that ZIKV causes benign

20

sporadic infections in both Africa and Asia. Therefore, when the first epidemic

21

appeared in Yap Island, Micronesia, in 2007, it was initially misdiagnosed as Dengue

22

fever. During this outbreak (Micronesia, 2007), Forty-nine ZIKV infected cases were

23

confirmed, while serological evidence of infection was obtained from 73% of the

24

individuals older than 3 years (2). In 2013, it caused another epidemic in French

1

Polynesia (with > 400 laboratory confirmed cases) before spreading across the Pacific

2

Ocean to invade Brazil, Suriname, and Columbia (7). A summary of ZIKV history

3

and previous outbreaks is shown in table 1 and the CDC map of current ZIKV-

4

infected areas is shown in figure 1.

5

Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the current strain belongs to the Asian subtype

6

and shares more than 99.7% of nucleotides and 99.9% of amino acid identity with the

7

strain of French Polynesian outbreak in 2013 (1). These results suggested that the

8

current ZIKV epidemic reached South America from the epidemic of French

9

Polynesia in 2013 by spreading across the Pacific Ocean.

10

3. Pathogenesis and Transmission

11

The pathogenesis of ZIKV infection remains largely unknown, but most arboviruses

12

are thought to replicate within the skin dendrites at the primary inoculation site before

13

spreading to the regional lymph nodes and then to the blood stream (8). The virus is

14

claimed to spend an intrinsic incubation period of 4 to 5 days within the human host,

15

infecting another vector during blood feeding where it spends an extrinsic incubation

16

period of 8 to 12 days and disseminates to the vector's saliva to infect another host as

17

illustrated in Figure 2 (9).

18

3.1.

Mechanical transmission

19

Like most Arboviruses, Zika virus maintains a complex cycle of transmission between

20

arthropods and vertebrate animals (1). The virus was first isolated from Aedes

21

Africanus mosquito in 1948 in Zika forest (10). However, Ae. Aegypti mosquito was

22

identified as the main vector, feeding on blood from infected individuals and

23

transmitting the virus to healthy ones (9). Other Aedes mosquito species are suggested

24

to be involved in viral transmission as Ae. Albopictus, a highly invasive vector

1

presenting a threat to urban as well as rural areas (11,12). The global distribution of

2

both Ae. Aegypti and Albopictus is growing, increasing the risk of arbovirus

3

pandemics (13). A molecular study, performed in 2014 on 37 isolated samples of the

4

virus, showed that the virus has acquired a molecular change to adapt to the Ae.

5

Dalzieli vector by losing a glycosylation site (N154) in its protein envelope (2). In

6

2013, researchers have noted an analogous pattern of spread between ZIKV and

7

Chikungunya, another member of the flaviviridae family transmitted by Aedes

8

mosquito species (14).

9

3.2.

Sexual transmission

10

In 2011, a case report suggested a non-vector borne route of viral transmission

11

through sexual contact (15). In December 2015, another case report was published

12

confirming the presence of viral particles in the semen of a 44 year old man who had

13

been diagnosed with ZIKV infection two weeks earlier (16). In February 2016, the

14

center of disease control (CDC) in the USA announced possible sexual transmission

15

in 14 cases, but the mode of transmission was not confirmed (17). Sexual

16

transmission of Zika virus through infected semen is now well established (18).

17

Despite the fact that the RNA of ZIKV can persist in semen for up to 62 days, cases

18

usually present before 19 days of sexual contact and only one case has been reported

19

of a woman presenting with a ZIKV infection 44 days after the onset of symptoms in

20

her partner (19). Also, a case report indicated that ZIKV can be transmitted through

21

anal sex, as well as vaginal sex (20).

22

3.3.

Maternal fetal transmission

23

Pregnant women are susceptible to ZIKV during all trimesters of pregnancy and

1

maternal-fetal transmission has been confirmed. Also perinatal mode of transmission

2

has been reported in two cases in French Polynesia and was associated with mild

3

disease in newborn infants (21).

4

3.4.

Blood transfusion

5

During the outbreak of ZIKV in French Polynesia, Musso et al., demonstrated the risk

6

of potential transmission through blood transfusion obtained from infected individuals

7

(22).

8

4. Clinical Picture

9

When the virus was initially reported in human in 1952, the infection was known to

10

be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic starting with mild fever, small joint pain,

11

retro-orbital headache, and conjunctivitis (23). Three to five days following the rise in

12

temperature, the patient develops a widely spread maculopapular rash (15,23–25).

13

Although ZIKV is known to cause a self-limited infection in adults, the

14

documentation of 73 cases of Guillan-Barrè Syndrome (GBS) during the French

15

Polynesian outbreak raised concerns about a possible association between the virus

16

and serious neurological complications (26). Similarly, in the Brazilian outbreak in

17

April 2015, the Brazilian ministry of health reported increased frequency of GBS and,

18

moreover, a 20 fold increase in the rate of microcephaly within the newborn

19

population (27). However, the causality link between ZIKV infection and

20

development of GBS has not been formally established so far and the strongest

21

evidence in the literature about it comes from a case control study that identified 42

22

cases of GBS of which 88% of them reporting a recent history of acute viral infection

23

during the French Polynesia outbreak (28).

24

The causality association between ZIKV infection in the first trimester of pregnancy

1

and development of microcephaly or other congenital anomalies has been formally

2

established (29,30). Most reported cases in the literature are for women who gave

3

birth to newborns with microcephaly and reported symptoms of contracting ZIKV

4

(mostly rash) in their first or second trimester of pregnancy (31–33). Recently, four

5

fetuses with microcephaly were born in Columbia to women who did not report

6

symptoms of contracting ZIKV, but had a lab evidence of ZIKV infection (34). A

7

recent report described ophthalmic findings as macular pigment mottling and loss of

8

foveal reflex associated with microcephaly and intracerebral calcifications in newborn

9

infants whose mothers showed clinical manifestations matching the criteria for ZIKV

10

diagnosis (35). In addition, RNA particles of ZIKV were detected in amniotic fluid

11

analysis of two women with radiological evidence of microcephaly. This finding

12

suggests that the virus crossed the placenta and may be incriminated in producing

13

congenital anomalies (36).

14

5. Diagnosis

15

5.1.

16

Clinical presentation

In the absence of other arbovirus epidemics, diagnosis can be solely made on clinical

17

grounds; however, as mentioned earlier, ZIKV outbreaks are usually associated with

18

other arbovirus epidemics making diagnostic investigations a necessity for clarifying

19

the clinical presentation (14).

20

5.2.

Serological analysis

21

Detecting IgM in the patient's serum by ELISA technique is an effective method, but

22

not available in most laboratories. Moreover, the cross reactivity with antibodies to

23

other arboviruses decreases the specificity of this technique (25,37,38). In a recent

24

study, serum samples from 21 patients with acute undifferentiated fever in Thailand

1

were examined for immunoreactivity against ZIKV, Dengue, Japanese encephalitis

2

and Chikungunya envelope antigens. The study showed evidence of immunoreactivity

3

against ZIKV envelope, suggesting that the ZIKV outbreak might have transmitted to

4

Thailand (39). However, due to the cross reactivity of serological analysis, more

5

specific diagnostic methods (e.g. molecular diagnosis using real time PCR) are

6

required.

7

5.3.

Molecular diagnosis (RT-PCR)

8

Molecular diagnosis can be performed using Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain

9

Reaction (RT-PCR) (40). Diagnostic studies suggested that serum can test positive for

10

viral particles as soon as the illness and fever appear, but when the rash occurs,

11

viremia starts to drop. However, viral nucleic acids remain detectable for about 20 to

12

60 days from the onset of symptoms (41,42).

13

During the French Polynesia epidemic, Kutsuna et al. reported positive viral RNA in

14

urine, while serum samples from the same patients were negative (43). Gourinat et al.

15

reported that the virus can be detected in the urine of infected individuals with higher

16

titers after 20 days from the onset of the disease (38). These data are consistent with

17

former studies which suggested prolonged detection of viral RNA of other

18

flaviviruses as dengue virus (44) and West Nile virus (45) in urine samples. These

19

reports highlight the role of viral detection in urine as a diagnostic method for ZIKV

20

infection during epidemics.

21 22 23

6. Treatment

1

Because the infection is self-limited, management is usually based on supportive

2

treatment and bed rest. When epidemics of multiple viruses coexist, differentiation

3

between these types may be valuable for prompt treatment because Dengue fever

4

requires monitoring of the patient hematocrit value and cessation of aspirin use to

5

reduce the risk of hemorrhage, while Chikungunya infection requires management of

6

post-chronic arthritis which occurs after the infection resolves (14). Aspirin should be

7

avoided in children below 10 years to avoid the occurrence of Reye's Syndrome,

8

while Acetaminophen can be used instead (46). A recent in-vitro study suggested that

9

ZIKV infection could respond to interferon therapy; however, further investigations

10

are essential to confirm this finding (47). Recently, a report has described a case of

11

ZIKV infection that was cured using an integrated approach of traditional Chinese

12

medicine and western medicine. This patient was admitted into the infectious isolation

13

wards and daily intravenous drip of 250 mg xiyanping injection was prescribed as an

14

antiviral therapy. Then, Ibuprofen was administered to reduce fever and

15

chloramphenicol eye drops were prescribed to relieve conjunctival congestion. After

16

few days, the urine and blood tests for ZIKV were negative (48).

17

Currently, there are no approved drugs for treatment of ZIKV or any other flavivirus

18

(49). Shan et al. suggested utilizing two strategies to develop a treatment for ZIKV

19

including: 1) repurposing the use of existing drugs, used for other clinical indications,

20

as potential therapeutic agents for ZIKV, mimicking what was attempted with the

21

Ebola virus, 2) Developing de novo inhibitors of ZIKV infection and replication,

22

using viral enzyme assays to identify potential inhibitors from compound libraries

23

(50).

24

7. Prevention

1

7.1.

2

Vaccination

To moment, no vaccines have been developed yet. But it is expected that the ZIKV

3

vaccine would encounter the same problems of arbovirus vaccines owing to the

4

sporadic and unexpected eruption of epidemics; therefore, vaccinating a large

5

population for fear of its outbreak might not be cost-effective (14,51). In March 2016,

6

eighteen academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies were working to

7

develop different types of vaccines for ZIKV including purified inactivated vaccine,

8

live attenuated vaccines, DNA vaccines, and viral vectored vaccines (52). Each of

9

these vaccines has its advantages and drawbacks. For instance, live attenuated

10

vaccines can elicit a strong, long-lasting immune response after few doses; however,

11

safety concerns arise, especially in case of pregnant women and children. On the other

12

hand, subunit vaccines are safe and can be developed in a shorter timeline, but they

13

require multiple doses to induce an immune response (50).

14

To accelerate the timeline of vaccine production, all of these vaccines should be

15

pursued concurrently. We are aware that most of these vaccines are in the preclinical

16

trials phase and some of them have shown a promising efficacy in animal studies.

17

Recently, an animal study has been published showing that intramuscular injection of

18

a DNA vaccine, encoding the full length of PrM and E structural proteins, elicited a

19

stronger humoral immune response in mice than other vaccines that did not encode

20

the PrM protein (53). Another DNA vaccine, developed by Invoice Pharmaceuticals,

21

could induce an immune response against ZIKV in monkeys and rabbits (54,55).

22

We are aware of four phase 1 studies registered on clinicaltrials.gov at the time of

23

publishing this article (NCT02840487, NCT02887482, NCT02809443, and

24

NCT01967238) and are expected to start in the second half of 2016. Although the

1

timeline to provide an effective vaccine for ZIKV is being condensed, the pathway to

2

licensure of an effective vaccine may take four to five years at a minimum (56). In a

3

recent article by Durbin et al., the authors highlighted five considerations for ZIKV

4

vaccine development including 1) the target population for immunization. The

5

ultimate goal of vaccination is providing this vaccine to children residing in endemic

6

areas as a part of their routine immunization, 2) which vaccine is safe for use in

7

pregnancy and what is the best timing for vaccination as congenital anomalies due to

8

ZIKV infection occur very early in pregnancy, 3) The needed number of doses to

9

elicit an immune response, 4) The safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in

10

persons with former flavivirus exposure; therefore, developed vaccines should be

11

tested in both flavivirus-naive and flavivirus-exposed individuals, and 5)

12

sustainability of the protective effect of the vaccine (55).

13

7.2.

14

Vector control

Other preventive measures can be learnt from the Yellow fever virus; vector control is

15

suggested to be the most efficient preventive strategy by using insect repellents and

16

house screens, wearing long sleeved shirts, sleeping in air conditioned rooms, and

17

clearing up household debris which act as breading sites for mosquitos. The World

18

Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of repellents containing DEET (N,

19

N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), IR3535 (3-[N-acetyl-N-butyl]-aminopropionic acid

20

ethyl

2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-

21

methylpropylester) (57). Recently, the WHO’s vector control advisory group is

22

discussing the use of genetically modified mosquitos to control Ae. Aegypti, the main

23

vector of Zika virus (58). The OX513A male mosquito was used successfully before

24

to tackle dengue fever in Brazil through competing with the wild Ae. Aegypti males.

25

ester)

or

icaridin

(1-piperidinecarboxylic

acid,

7.3.

Travel and pregnancy measures

1

Before the association between ZIKV and congenital malformations in newborn

2

infants could be established, the CDC adopted the presumption of “guilty until proved

3

innocent” and developed guidelines for pregnant women and their caregivers (59).

4

These guidelines imply that all pregnant women should consider postponing their

5

travel to areas with ZIKV ongoing transmission. If necessary, adhering to the

6

previously mentioned vector control guidelines is strongly advised. For women with a

7

history of travel to infected areas, they should be examined for ZIKV infection as well

8

as Dengue and Chikungunya due to the similar geographical distributions of these

9

viruses. Symptomatic pregnant women or those with ultrasound evidence of

10

microcephaly should be tested for ZIKV infection using RT-PCR (60). Pregnant

11

women with established diagnosis of ZIKV should perform serial ultrasound every 3

12

to 4 weeks with referral to a maternal-fetal medicine unit for further management

13

(59).

14

The CDC recently recommended sexual abstinence or condom use for men who are

15

residing or recently returning from an area with active ZIKV transmission (61).

16

Because of the potential risks associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy,

17

the CDC has recommended health care providers to discuss prevention of unintended

18

pregnancy with women who reside in areas of active Zika virus transmission and do

19

not want to become pregnant (62). However, limitations in access to contraception in

20

some of these areas might affect the ability to prevent an unintended pregnancy (63).

21 22 23

8. Future research

1

Zika virus infection is a threat, not only to public health, but also to global security

2

and economy. From a preventive view, future research should focus on developing an

3

effective vaccine against ZIKV. In terms of treatment, the development of a broad

4

spectrum antiviral drug has been recently recommended because the "One Bug- One

5

Drug" approach is no longer practical (14). The association between ZIKV and

6

neurological manifestation require further verification. In addition, the underlying

7

pathological process and identification of population whom are at risk of these

8

neurological manifestations should be investigated in the future.

9

Abbreviations: GBS: Guillan-Barrè Syndrome, RT-PCR: Reverse Transcriptase

10

Polymerase Chain Reaction, ZIKV: Zika virus.

11

Conflict of interest: None to declare

12

Acknowledgement: None

13

Funding source: None to declare

14 15

1

9. References:

2

1.

Enfissi A, Codrington J, Roosblad J, Kazanji M, Rousset D. Zika virus genome from the Americas. The Lancet. 2016/01/18 ed. Elsevier; 2016;387(10015):227–8.

3 4

2.

Faye OO, Freire CCM, Iamarino A, Faye OO, de Oliveira JVC, Diallo M, et al. Molecular Evolution of Zika Virus during Its Emergence in the 20 th Century. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014/01/15 ed. Public Library of Science; 2014;8(1):e2636.

5 6 7

3.

Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. Molecular biology of flaviviruses. Advances in virus research. United States; 2003;59:23–61.

8 9

4.

Kuno G, Chang G-JJ. Full-length sequencing and genomic characterization of Bagaza, Kedougou, and Zika viruses. Arch Virol. 2007/01/02 ed. Springer; 2007;152(4):687– 96.

10 11 12

5.

De Melo Freire CC, Iamarino A, de Lima Neto DF, de Andrade Zanotto PM. Spread of the pandemic Zika virus lineage is associated with NS1 codon usage adaptation in humans. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Labs Journals; 2015;32839.

13 14 15

6.

Macnamara FN. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954/03/01 ed. 1954;48(2):139–45.

16 17 18

7.

Cao-Lormeau V-M, Musso D. Emerging arboviruses in the Pacific. The Lancet. Elsevier; 2014;384(9954):1571–2.

19 20

8.

Fagbami AH. Zika virus infections in Nigeria: virological and seroepidemiological investigations in Oyo State. J Hyg (Lond). 1979/10/01 ed. Cambridge Univ Press; 1979;83(02):213–9.

21 22 23

9.

Hayes EB. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009/10/01 ed. 2009;15(9):1347–50.

24 25

10.

Haddow AJ, Williams MC, Woodall JP, Simpson DIH, Goma LKH. TWELVE ISOLATIONS OF ZIKA VIRUS FROM AEDES (STEGOMYIA) AFRICANUS (THEOBALD) TAKEN IN AND ABOVE A UGANDA FOREST. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1964/01/01 ed. World Health Organization; 1964;31(1):57.

26 27 28 29

11.

Grard G, Caron M, Mombo IM, Nkoghe D, Ondo SM, Jiolle D, et al. Zika virus in Gabon (Central Africa)–2007: a new threat from Aedes albopictus? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014/02/12 ed. Public Library of Science; 2014;8(2):e2681.

30 31 32

12.

Wong P-SJS, Li MZI, Chong C-SS, Ng L-CC, Tan C-HH. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse): a potential vector of Zika virus in Singapore. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013/08/13 ed. Public Library of Science; 2013;7(8):e2348.

33 34 35

13.

Kraemer MUG, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne AQN, Shearer FM, Barker CM, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Elife. eLife Sciences Publications Limited; 2015;4:e08347.

1 2 3

14.

Fauci AS, Morens DM. Zika Virus in the Americas - Yet Another Arbovirus Threat. N Engl J Med. 2016/01/14 ed. 2016;

4 5

15.

Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Chilson Foy JL, Blitvich BJ, Travassos da Rosa A, Haddow AD, et al. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011/05/03 ed. 2011;17(5):880–2.

6 7 8

16.

Musso D, Roche C, Robin E, Nhan T, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V-MM. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerging infectious diseases. 2015/01/28 ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015;21(2):359–61.

9 10 11

17.

McCarthy M. US health officials investigate sexually transmitted Zika virus infections. BMJ. 2016 Feb;i1180.

12 13

18.

D’Ortenzio E, Matheron S, de Lamballerie X, Hubert B, Piorkowski G, Maquart M, et al. Evidence of sexual transmission of Zika virus. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(22):2195–8.

14 15 16

19.

Jean Marie Turmel PA, Bruno Hubert YMV, Maquart M, Guillou-Guillemette H Le, Art IL-G. Late sexual transmission of Zika virus related to. The Lancet. 2016;6736(16):30775.

17 18 19

20.

Deckard DT, Chung WM, Brooks JT, Smith JC, Woldai S, Hennessey M, et al. Male-toMale Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus - Texas, January 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. United States; 2016;65(14):372–4.

20 21 22

21.

Besnard M, Lastere S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014/04/12 ed. 2014;19(13).

23 24 25

22.

Musso D, Nhan T, Robin E, Roche C, Bierlaire D, Zisou K, et al. Potential for Zika virus transmission through blood transfusion demonstrated during an outbreak in French Polynesia, November 2013 to February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014/04/18 ed. 2014;19(14).

26 27 28 29

23.

Duffy MR, Chen T-HH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, federated states of Micronesia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009/06/12 ed. Mass Medical Soc; 2009;360(24):2536–43.

30 31 32

24.

Kwong JC, Druce JD, Leder K. Zika virus infection acquired during brief travel to Indonesia. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2013/07/24 ed. ASTMH; 2013;89(3):516–7.

33 34 35

25.

Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, Velez JO, Lambert AJ, Johnson AJ, et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008/08/06 ed. 2008;14(8):1232–9.

36 37 38

26.

Oehler E, Watrin L, Larre P, Leparc-Goffart I, Lastere S, Valour F, et al. Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome--case report, French Polynesia, December 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014/03/15 ed. 2014;19(9).

1 2 3

27.

De Araújo JSS, Regis CT, Gomes RGS, Tavares TR. Microcephaly in northeastern Brazil: a review of 16 208 births between 2012 and 2015. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;4.

4 5

28.

Cao-Lormeau V-M, Blake A, Mons S, Lastère S, Roche C, Vanhomwegen J, et al. Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study. The Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1531–9.

6 7 8

29.

Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika virus and birth defects— reviewing the evidence for causality. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(20):1981–7.

9 10 11

30.

Cauchemez S, Besnard M, Bompard P, Dub T, Guillemette-Artur P, Eyrolle-Guignot D, et al. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–15: a retrospective study. The Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2125–32.

12 13 14

31.

Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popovid M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(10):951– 8.

15 16 17

32.

Brasil P, Pereira Jose P J, Raja Gabaglia C, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro— preliminary report. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;

18 19 20

33.

De Oliveira WK. Increase in reported prevalence of microcephaly in infants born to women living in areas with confirmed Zika virus transmission during the first trimester of pregnancy—Brazil, 2015. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2016;65.

21 22 23 24

34.

Pacheco O, Beltrán M, Nelson CA, Valencia D, Tolosa N, Farr SL, et al. Zika virus disease in Colombia—preliminary report. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;

25 26

35.

Ventura C V, Maia M, Bravo-Filho V, Góis AL, Belfort R, Gois AL, et al. Zika virus in Brazil and macular atrophy in a child with microcephaly. The Lancet. 2016/01/18 ed. Elsevier; 2016;387(10015):228.

27 28 29

36.

Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, Horovitz DD, Cavalcanti DP, Pessoa A, et al. Possible Association Between Zika Virus Infection and Microcephaly - Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016/01/29 ed. 2016;65(3):59–62.

30 31 32

37.

Dick GWA, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus (I). Isolations and serological specificity. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Oxford University Press; 1952;46(5):509–20.

33 34 35

38.

Gourinat A-CC, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Goarant C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, O’Connor O, et al. Detection of Zika virus in urine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014/12/23 ed. 2015;21(1):84–6.

36 37 38

39.

Wikan N, Suputtamongkol Y, Yoksan S, Smith DR, Auewarakul P. Immunological evidence of Zika virus transmission in Thailand. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine. 2016 Feb;9(2):141–4.

1 2 3

40.

Faye O, Faye O, Dupressoir A, Weidmann M, Ndiaye M, Alpha Sall A. One-step RT-PCR for detection of Zika virus. J Clin Virol. 2008/08/05 ed. 2008;43(1):96–101.

4 5

41.

Barzon L, Pacenti M, Berto A, Sinigaglia A, Franchin E, Lavezzo E, et al. Isolation of infectious Zika virus from saliva and prolonged viral RNA shedding in a traveller returning from the Dominican Republic to Italy, January 2016. Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin. Sweden; 2016;21(10).

6 7 8 9 10

42.

Corman VM, Rasche A, Baronti C, Aldabbagh S, Cadar D, Reusken C. Clinical comparison, standardization and optimization of Zika virus molecular detection. Bull World Healt Organ [Internet]. Forthcoming. Available from: http://www. who. int/bulletin/online_first/16-175950. pdf.

11 12 13 14

43.

Kutsuna S, Kato Y, Takasaki T, Moi M, Kotaki A, Uemura H, et al. Two cases of Zika fever imported from French Polynesia to Japan, December 2013 to January 2014 [corrected]. Euro Surveill. 2014/02/11 ed. 2014;19(4).

15 16 17

44.

Hirayama T, Mizuno Y, Takeshita N, Kotaki A, Tajima S, Omatsu T, et al. Detection of dengue virus genome in urine by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR: a laboratory diagnostic method useful after disappearance of the genome in serum. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012 Jun;50(6):2047–52.

18 19 20 21

45.

Barzon L, Pacenti M, Franchin E, Pagni S, Martello T, Cattai M, et al. Excretion of West Nile virus in urine during acute infection. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013 Oct;208(7):1086–92.

22 23 24

46.

Fulginiti VA, Brunell PA, Cherry JD, Ector WL, Gershon AA, Gotoff SP, et al. Aspirin and Reye syndrome. Pediatrics. Am Acad Pediatrics; 1982;69(6):810–2.

25 26

47.

Hamel R, Dejarnac O, Wichit S, Ekchariyawat P, Neyret A, Luplertlop N, et al. Biology of Zika Virus Infection in Human Skin Cells. Journal of virology. 2015/06/19 ed. Am Soc Microbiol; 2015;89(17):8880–96.

27 28 29

48.

Deng Y, Zeng L, Bao W, Xu P, Zhong G. [Experience of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in first case of imported Zika virus disease in China]. Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue. 2016 Feb;28(2):106–9.

30 31 32

49.

Plourde AR, Bloch EM. A Literature Review of Zika Virus. Emerging infectious diseases. 2016;22(7).

33 34

50.

Shan C, Xie X, Barrett ADT, Garcia-Blanco MA, Tesh RB, Vasconcelos PF da C, et al. Zika virus: diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccine. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2016;2(3):170–2.

35 36 37

51.

Chen LH, Hamer DH. Zika Virus: Rapid Spread in the Western Hemisphere. Ann Intern Med. 2016/02/03 ed. 2016;164(9):613–5.

38 39

52.

WHO | WHO and experts prioritize vaccines, diagnostics and innovative vector control tools for Zika R&D [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2016/researchdevelopment-zika/en/

1 2 3 4

53.

Larocca RA, Abbink P, Peron JPS, Paolo M de A, Iampietro MJ, Badamchi-Zadeh A, et al. Vaccine protection against Zika virus from Brazil. Nature. 2016;536(7617):474–8.

5 6

54.

Dyer O. Trials of Zika vaccine are set to begin in North America. British medical journal. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2016;(353):3588.

7 8

55.

Durbin AP. Vaccine Development for Zika Virus—Timelines and Strategies. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. Thieme Medical Publishers; 2016.

9 10

56.

Lipsitch M, Cowling BJ. Zika vaccine trials. Science. 2016;353(6304):1094–5.

11

57.

WHO | Zika virus Fact Sheet [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/en/

12 13

58.

Gulland A. Genetically modified mosquitos may be used in fight against Zika. BMJ. 2016 Feb;352:i1086.

14 15

59.

Petersen EE, Staples JE, Meaney-Delman D, Fischer M, Ellington SR, Callaghan WM, et al. Interim Guidelines for Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016/01/23 ed. 2016;65(2):30–3.

16 17 18

60.

Oduyebo T. Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure—United States, 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2016;65.

19 20 21

61.

Oster AM. Interim guidelines for prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus— United States, 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2016;65.

22 23

62.

Tepper NK, Goldberg HI, Bernal MIV, Rivera B, Frey MT, Malave C, et al. Estimating Contraceptive Needs and Increasing Access to Contraception in Response to the Zika Virus Disease Outbreak - Puerto Rico, 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. United States; 2016;65(12):311–4.

24 25 26 27

63.

Simeone RM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Meaney-Delman D, Petersen EE, Galang RR, Oduyebo T, et al. Possible Zika Virus Infection Among Pregnant Women - United States and Territories, May 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. United States; 2016;65(20):514–9.

28 29 30 31 32

1

Figure 1 shows areas of active transmission of ZIKV, in the current outbreak,

2

according to CDC reports. Left circle indicates viral transmission in Pacific

3

islands as Samoa and Tonga. Right circle indicates viral transmission in Cape

4

Verde, West Africa (obtained 10th, February, 2016).

5 6

Figure 2 shows the life cycle of ZIKV between the Aedes Mosquito and the human host.

7 8 9 10

1

Table

2

Table 1 summarizes the history of VIKV discovery and epidemics

3

1947

ZIKV was first discovered

1952 2007 2013

ZIKV first human infection in Nigeria. First epidemic Yap island, Micronesia 49 cases Second epidemic French Polynesia >400 cases >1.5 million cases (in Brazil; Third epidemic South America according to Brazil Ministry of health)

2015

4 5 6 7

The author has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchG