Appendix S1: Approximation of the sampling rate distribution - PLOS
Recommend Documents
the Duchy of Aquitaine. 2. The Capetian Kingdom ... Central England, excluding Devon, Cornwall, and the counties north of the Humber. 4. Northern France and ...
function Fi(x) with i = 1,...,m, there exist some number ti â (0, 1) and a vector zi = (1 â ti)y1 + tiy2 such that: Fi(y2) â Fi(y1) = DxFi(zi)(y2 â y1). (4). Choosing h ...
compound that can be retrieved from public databases such as Scifinder and ... 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 sign al in te n sity. pH of a 4 mM aqueous solution a) b) ...
Predictor Hazard Ratio P-value. Hazard Ratio ... In each set of patients, the multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratios [37] for GSVD and age ..... P value 1 10 1.
Fig A shows the UML class diagram, while Table A shows the description of the state variables of the ... price (P). Firms' sales price. No. No .... accelerator effect and, together, drive a continued and exponential economic growth in our model.
brightness comparison condition, trials began with the occluder presented for 500 ms. An oval image then appeared to the left and the right of the occluder and ...
observed outcome and model-predicted probabilities as measured by the model deviance (-2 Ã the log-likelihood). To reduce the number of possible models ...
Hybridization Energies under no neighbor influence. Free energies âGx y are obtained from hybridization energies which include the effect of both the base-.
in binding efficiency makes survival of viral DNA a ârunawayâ process: it becomes progressively less plausible to completely exterminate viral DNA after the first ...
The former occurs from the interior of Washington to the Mojave Desert in California and the ... Munroe, 1976 (type locality: Washington, Mt. Rainier. [CNC]), L. a.
For a (high) intercept of. ( )0 exp. 100 β = , all models had near identical results, although the log-link models resulted in slightly lower mean, variance, skewness ...
Now we consider all possible generations with potential retroposon insertions that later ... by S. Then the total numbers of retroposon insertions with properties j.
elements of informed consent required by federal regulations. The QuIC-A survey has ... Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). 5.4 Data Safety ...
S1 Appendix. Survey items utilized in the analysis of .... Question: S9Q6A: Have you EVER had any type of cancer? Value Label. 1 Yes. 2 No. 7 Don't know.
Each curve Ci is offset by a horizontal distance m. The slope spk at each point pk of the curves is calculated using pk+1 in first order Taylor expansion. According.
The standard error (SE) for the death rate x m was calculated using ... (i, x=65, 70, 75, 80, 85) to estimate the standard error for life expectancy at age x, where i x.
Putative products of ECANG7_10984 were predicted using the Expasy translate tool (http://web.expasy.org/cgi- · bin/translate/dna_aa). Since ECANG7_10984 ...
of Covert Attention through Pupillometry (S1 Appendix). Sebastiaan Mathôt1*, Jean-Baptiste Melmi1, Lotje van der Linden1, and Stefan Van der Stigchel2.
18. sugar$.ab,ti. 19. fruit$.ab,ti. 20. vegetable$.ab,ti. 21. ... golf$ or tennis$ or badminton$ or bowl$ or curl$).ab,ti. 60. (bicycl$ or training or trainer$ or bik$ or ...
Comparison of 4-state and 9-state Models of CaM-protein Binding. ... The high cooperativity of Ca2+ binding at each CaM terminus has led to the development.
product because the height of peak 9 is greater than that of peak 10 (this case ... the expected peak heights of drop-out alleles are strictly different in each allele, ...
Appendix S1: Approximation of the sampling rate distribution - PLOS
Appendix S1: Approximation of the sampling rate distribution. First, we show via simulation that a gamma distribution provides a good approximation of the ...
Appendix S1: Approximation of the sampling rate distribution First, we show via simulation that a gamma distribution provides a good approximation of the distribution of the sampling rate, λ, at the values of the accumulation model parameters estimated from the data. We then use this result to derive an analytical approximation that allows us to write the gamma rate distribution parameters in terms of ηD , νD , ηS , and νS . The simulation of λ proceeds by first choosing a set of accumulation model parameter values, and then drawing K observations each from the distributions of S and D, multiplying each pair of values thus obtained, and storing the results. We then fit a gamma distribution to the simulated value via maximum likelihood, and compared the fitted gamma to the simulated values using a qq-plot (Fig. 1). The 95% confidence bands in figure 1 are obtained assuming that the parameters of the fitted gamma are known without error (i.e., treating it as the true distribution and the simulated values as a sample to be compared to it). These confidence bands are thus narrower than would be the case had we acknowledged this uncertainty and this comparison is thus conservative. Figure 1 demonstrates that the gamma provides a reasonable approximation of the distribution of lambda across the extremes of the parameter values shown in table 2 in the main text. We now want to obtain the parameters ηλ and νλ of the approximate gamma distribution of sampling rates. We do this by first finding the mean and variance of the quantity λ = SD when both S and D are gamma distributed random variables. Though we do not know the full distribution of λ, with exact expressions for its mean and variance in hand, we can approximate it by fitting a gamma distribution to it via the method of moments. The mean of a gamma distribution with parameters η and ν is ην, while the variance is ην 2 . Recalling basic results from probability theory, the mean of the product of two uncorrelated random variables is simply the product of the means, so hλi = ηD ηS νD νS .
(1)
where the angle bracket notation indicates a mean. The variance is given by Var(λ) = Var(D)hSi2 + Var(S)hDi2 + Var(D)Var(S) = ηD ηS νD2 νS2 (ηD + ηS + 1).
(2)
Finding distributions of products of random variables is in general a difficult task and we will not attempt it here. Instead, we can approximate the distribution of λ with a gamma distribution using the method of moments. A key feature of the gamma distribution here is that it has simple moments and thus simple moment estimators. The shape and scale parameters of the best-fit gamma rate distribution are given by ηλ =
hλi2 Var(λ)
and
νλ =
Var(λ) , hλi
(3)
which, after substituting equation (1) for hλi and equation (2) for Var(λ) and simplifying, are given in the main text as equations (4) and (5), respectively.
1
Figure 1: Graphical check of the approximation of the rate parameter distribution with a gamma distribution. The solid line is the best-fit gamma and the dashed lines represent 95% confidence bands. The sample size used throughout was K = 100, similar to the sample sizes of the burden datasets.