Argument for Subverting Existing Dominant Paradigm ...
Recommend Documents
Mar 29, 2008 - Subverting the "Mainstream" Paradigm through Magical Realism in Thomas. King's "Green Grass, Running Water". Ibis Gómez-Vega.
Aug 7, 2017 - Harvard University and NBER. UC at Berkeley and NBER. August 7 ... Nominal exchange rates have always been
Aug 7, 2017 - ... Jackson Hole Symposium, volume 27. Federal. Reserve Bank at Kansas City. ... MIT Press, Cambridge. Kug
Nov 15, 2016 - The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other membe
Gudykunst and Kim's work, taken from their book Communicating with ...
Gudykunst and Kim (1997), in particular, is a good test case for the state of
intercultural.
munication and development' theory, was borrowed from neoclassical ... ducts of the industrial system were assumed to carry solutions to the ... i.e., mass media, was seen as an exogenous ... ic imperialism or dependency, then a different.
work posits that a theory of production in building construction embodies the ...... Proceedings, CIB World Building Congress 2007, Cape Town, South Africa,.
Research on information technology (IT) innovation is concerned with identifying the .... to go beyond the dominant paradigm, as summarized in Figure 2 and Table 1 ..... year period provides a very nice illustration of how to model propensity, suscep
Aug 27, 2015 - National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013, the social implications ... Intelligence Agency by Jennifer Gradecki and. Derek Curry. Faced with 100 ...
Ajax is not a new programming language, is an umbrella term which ..... past job
he was employed at IBM System & Technology Group in. Dublin (Ireland).
and film-making in Cologne and London. Introduction ... For furniture we compared some districts in Sweden: furniture is typically a sector for small to.
Abstract. This paper presents a computational method for argumentation on the basis of a declarative character- ization of the structure of arguments.
aDepartment of Management and Marketing, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, ..... Because the bulk of previous research has had such a.
ventions are implicated where CBT has not been tested or, in many cases, become the treatment paradigm of choice. The literature is not without debate (usually.
Jan 13, 2012 - Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University, USA ... an article detailed how our forests have been fired yearly to increase the growth of forage for ... in fire regimes appear to be considerable when relying on âfire s
Jan 13, 2012 - Fire suppression history and its relation to wildfire, defensive space and prescribed burns ... California, Brazil, Greece and Indonesia have illustrated again the ..... Since Alber and Julin bring up the Oakland Hills fire in 1991,.
Abstract. One of the defenses against DNS cache poisoning is randomization of the IP address of the queried name server.
DNS. Resolver. Attacker. DNS Query: What is the IP of ibm.com? DNS server .... Data parsed out of the root's zone file:
global state shared between different domain names. (in our case the SRTT values are kept as a global state). I. Introdu
Agenda. ⢠Off-path (blind) DNS cache poisoning attacks. ⢠BIND's name server (NS) selection algorithm and previous a
Aug 23, 2008 - A constant-round interactive argument is introduced to show exis- tence of a Hamiltonian cycle in a directed graph. Graph is represented.
Motivation. ⢠The security of the DNS transaction directly depends on the nonce's randomness. ⢠The source port and
global state shared between different domain names. (in our case the SRTT values are kept as a global state). I. Introdu
Neuroendocrinology Letters Volume 35 No. ... Eva Jozifkova 1, Martin Konvicka 2, Jaroslav Flegr 3 .... are heavier at birth (both genders) and male more .... When watching a movie or reading a book I would be excited by a situation in which a (male)
Argument for Subverting Existing Dominant Paradigm ...
Argument for Subverting Existing Dominant Paradigm for CBE/CBD ... infamous spaghetti design (or code) and crisis by using specific kind of parts that are.
Argument for Subverting Existing Dominant Paradigm for CBE/CBD Except designing and engineering of software products, designing and engineering of no other complex product is affected by the infamous spaghetti design (or code) and engineering crisis comparable to the infamous software crisis. Why?
The designers of countless physical products successfully eliminated the infamous spaghetti design (or code) and crisis by using specific kind of parts that are designed and conducive to be assembled and disassembled, where the specific kind of parts are widely known and/or referred to as components.
In the context of CBD/CBE (Component Based Design, Engineering and/or Design and Development) of countless kinds of products we know and use every day (e.g. cars, computers, cell-phones, TVs, ACs, equipment such as printers, airplanes, machines or machinery for factory to name a few): No part can be a component, if the part is not conducive to be assembled and disassembled.
Today there exist many kinds of so called components for software products, but no known kind of software components is designed and/or conducive to be assembled. Designing and engineering of each and every complex software product is affected by infamous software crisis and spaghetti design (or code).
Designing and engineering of no other kind of complex product has affected by such crisis or spaghetti design (or code), because they are designed by using specific kind of parts that are designed and conducive to be assembled and disassembled. Where the specific kind of parts are widely known or referred to as components.
There is no valid reason, why designers and engineers of complex software products can’t eliminate such crisis and spaghetti design (or code) by using specific kind of parts that are designed and conducive to be assembled and disassembled. It is not hard to invent components for software that are conducive to be assembled and disassembled for building each and every complex software product by assembling such components that are conducive to be assembled and disassembled.
This clearly shows that the 50 years old basic untested beliefs about components at the root and that are used as foundation for building or evolving existing dominant software engineering paradigm for past 50 years must be challenged. The most authoritative and widely acclaimed and accepted book “The Structure Scientific Revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn says: Normal science never challenges the basic beliefs or tenets at the root of any dominant paradigm. There is no other book or person more authoritative on paradigm shifts and structure of scientific revolutions.
In fact, the book by Dr. Kuhn widely acclaimed to be most authoritative on paradigms says: Normal science suppresses novelties and evidence which undermine the foundations of a dominant paradigm. Scientists take great pains to defend the assumption that are foundation for the dominant paradigm.
There is no exception to this rule: Any dominant paradigm can be and must be subverted, if the basic received beliefs (i.e. fundamental assumptions) at the root and are relied on as foundation for building the dominant paradigm are flawed.
There is no exception to this rule: Subverting any such flawed dominant paradigm of any scientific or engineering discipline (by exposing flawed basic assumptions) always results in a revolution in the scientific or engineering discipline.
It is not hard to prove that the basic beliefs (that are 50 years old and) at the root and are foundation of the existing dominant software engineering paradigm are flawed. The BoK (Body of Knowledge) that shaped perception of reality for existing dominant software engineering paradigm has been acquired and accumulated by relying on the untested assumptions made 50 to 60 years ago.
As predicted by the acclaimed book, influential researchers and scientists have been taking great pains to defend flawed assumption that are at foundation by supressing novelties and evidence even by resorting to personal attacks to silence anyone trying to show evidence, which can expose the flawed assumption that are used as very foundations for building the dominant software engineering paradigm.
