Document not found! Please try again

Artefact Characterisation for JPEG and JPEG 2000 Image Codecs ...

1 downloads 0 Views 954KB Size Report
five JPEG and JPEG2000 codec implementations is compared. All five codecs ... The objective artefact measures can be used in the image and video codec.
I'.NCINEER- Vol. XXXX, No. 03, pp. 25-30, 2007

en 0.4

LJJ

0.3 0.2

/ 0.1 100

0

/ 3

ix

?

/

/

^

&

*~~- ^ '

^x

-— '

150

Step height

10

1

10

2

Compression Ratio

Figure 6: The variation of ringing with step height for a JPEG codec at quality factor of 20.

Figure 7: Comparison of three JPEG codecs for edge blur against compression ratio.

It was observed that ringing errors are not monotonic because of a threshold effect. As the step height is changed, the dominant

ENGINEER

X

f

/

v^

T3

/

28

14 12

0.9

1

— -t — JPEG codec JPEG codec 2 JPEG codec 3

_+_

1

o> n ^ nU.b

'5> c if ° 6

f

/

0.4

f

/ ii t NV /i £

./

X 0.2

/

J

—H

J PEG2000 codec

It •f ; 1

£

t,

\

I

V

/

0.6

% /

i_ Z!

V •I \

/ ,' -^ X

CD O) 04 ~O LU 0.3

/

7 •f'

0 10

*— ir***-^*

1.2

it

1^\

g>0.8 '5> °'6

/

t

--+— JPEG2000 codec 1 — • — JPEG2000 codec 2

,' .*

,/,,

X""

0.1

/

f

70

100

_*

0)

I

0.8

'5>

C 0.6

ir 0.4

0.2

0 10

f^

**+•*._>.« '

f1

,,

/

/

^

...

\v

„— ... - .—

s