Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18 DOI 10.1007/s11901-015-0250-1
MANAGEMENT OF THE CIRRHOTIC PATIENT (NS REAU AND A CARDENAS, SECTION EDITORS)
Assessment of Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cirrhosis Alberto Zanetto & Marco Senzolo & Alberto Ferrarese & Paolo Simioni & Patrizia Burra & Kryssia I. Rodríguez-Castro
Published online: 15 March 2015 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Abstract Cirrhosis is characterized by varying degrees of alterations of the different components of hemostasis, including thrombocytopenia, reduction of procoagulant factors, overactivation of the fibrinolytic system, and a precarious hemostatic equilibrium that can easily tilt towards bleeding. Predicting the risk of spontaneous bleeding from nonvariceal sites, variceal bleeding, and hemorrhagic complications associated with surgery or invasive procedures is a formidable challenge faced by clinicians caring for cirrhosis patients, and standard assays have demonstrated a poor correlation with episodes of bleeding. While new tests evaluating different components of coagulation as well as global assays are increasingly available and used to guide therapeutic approaches, there is still no optimal method to assess bleeding risk, and a combination between severity of liver disease, the presence of ongoing infection or renal insufficiency, as well as This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of the Cirrhotic Patient A. Zanetto : M. Senzolo (*) : A. Ferrarese : P. Burra : K. I. Rodríguez-Castro Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy e-mail:
[email protected] A. Zanetto e-mail:
[email protected] A. Ferrarese e-mail:
[email protected] P. Burra e-mail:
[email protected]
the type of bleeding itself seems to still be very important in evaluating the individual patient’s risk. Keywords Bleeding . Cirrhosis . Coagulation . Thromboelastography . Rotation thromboelastography
Introduction While in classical coagulation disorders such as hemophilia A or B or von Willebrand disease, a specific coagulation factor (namely, factor VIII, factor IX, or von Willebrand factor, respectively) is missing or defective and bleeding is predictable based on the absent factor, cirrhosis represents a far more complex scenario, where multiple aspects of hemostasis are profoundly altered, rendering the prediction of bleeding a much more challenging endeavor. Progressively worsening of end-stage liver disease is characterized by varying degrees of alterations of the different components of hemostasis, but in general, cirrhosis entails both modifications in the prothrombotic as well as in the prohemorrhagic components. Although it is becoming clear that standard assays of hemostasis are inadequate to evaluate the rebalanced hemostatic status in cirrhosis and are poor predictors of bleeding, they are still of widespread use and may furnish misleading information regarding the risk of bleeding. Clinicians might be increasingly aware that they can be thus led into administering unneeded or even nocuous prohemostatic factors.
K. I. Rodríguez-Castro e-mail:
[email protected] P. Simioni Clinica Medica V, Department of Internal Medicine, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padua, Padua, Italy e-mail:
[email protected]
Hemostatic Alterations in Cirrhosis As far as primary hemostasis is concerned, thrombocytopenia, defined as 3 and platelet count 2.5-s prolongation being associated with 47 and 87 % mortality, respectively) [98]. Moreover, platelet count below 50×103/dL determines an increased risk of bleeding during surgery. Another predictor of bleeding associated with surgery in cirrhosis patients is severity of liver disease itself: recently, severity of liver disease has been shown to be correlated with the risk of bleeding complications during brain surgery, with mortality reaching 63 % in Child C patients [99]. In a study in which outcomes of open-heart surgery (including emergency and elective surgery) in 24 patients with cirrhosis, most postoperative complications were related to bleeding: mediastinal bleeding occurred in 25 % of patients, while cardiac tamponade occurred in 17 %. Moreover, the principal causes of death in Child B patients 4/6 were hemorrhage and infection, while the cause of death in Child A and C patients (1/17 and 1/1, respectively) were infection. In this study, platelet count was not different in survivors vs. nonsurvivors, and other parameters related to coagulation and hemostasis were not explored in relation to survival or to frequency of complications [100]. In another study reporting on outcomes after open-heart surgery in 12 patients with cirrhosis, 6 of whom were in Child A and 6 in Child B classes, major complications including hemorrhage and hepatic
14
decompensation were associated with platelet count, while mortality (5/12) was associated with bleeding complications in 3 cases [101]. In yet another study, Hayashida and colleagues reported that open-heart surgery in cirrhosis patients was associated with infection in 33 % and major bleeding in 17 % of patients [102]. As far as cardiac catheterization is concerned, INR does not predict catheterization-related bleeding complications, as was shown in a study in which, however, no patient had an INR greater than 2.35 [103].
Laboratory Methods for the Assessment of Hemostatic Status and Bleeding Risk The net result of dichotomous alterations (pro- vs. anticoagulant) seems to settle a new hemostatic equilibrium that is, however, much more fragile considering the limited buffering capacity, with factors such as infection, renal dysfunction, and other decompensating circumstances determining the tipping of this balance towards bleeding or towards thrombotic complications [59••]. Moreover, establishing adequate laboratory parameters to characterize the dynamic hemostatic process, and, more so, using these values as predictors of bleeding, is certainly challenging. The latter is especially important in decision making, whereas risks of a surgical intervention are concerned, or whether preventive measures before a procedure are enacted, parameters that actually guide such practices are still approximate and partial at best. The inaccuracy and inadequacy of traditional coagulation tests such as INR and PTT as predictors of bleeding in cirrhosis patients have been widely demonstrated, and neither does their correction have an apparent impact on bleeding risk reduction, while this practice may result in documented deleterious effects [104]. Conventional tests such as INR, aPTT, bleeding time, and platelet count do not reflect the pathophysiological changes in cirrhosis and the complete hemostatic status and are inadequate in predicting both spontaneous as well as procedural/ surgical bleeding [77]. They are insensitive for decreased natural anticoagulants antithrombin, protein C and protein S, and do not account for other prothrombotic changes such as elevation of von Willebrand factor. In fact, although PT/INR and PTT are often elevated in cirrhosis, there is no correlation with the risk of bleeding, and this might be particularly true when INR is only mildly to modestly elevated (INR between 1.5 and 2.5) [60]. Moreover, the hemostatic status cannot be satisfactorily assessed by measuring levels of individual components, because the entire system strongly depends on the balance of pro- and antifibrinolytic factors. Traditional tests measure only a fraction of whole blood’s components and only the initial 5 % thrombin burst, without analyzing other clotting aspects that determine bleeding risk, such as clot formation, firmness, and degradation.
Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18
Bleeding time is prolonged in up to 40 % of patients with liver disease, but the clinical relevance of this prolongation is not firmly established [14], and this test is a poor predictor of the risk of bleeding in cirrhosis. A weak but significant correlation exists between platelet count and bleeding time [85], and no prospective studies have analyzed its possible ability to predict both spontaneous and procedural bleeding in cirrhosis. The thrombin generation test, in which platelet-poor or platelet-free plasma is incubated with small amounts of tissue factor as the trigger of coagulation and phospholipids are employed as substitutes for platelet surface [105], has been increasingly used to study coagulation in cirrhosis. Although this test yields more information on the entire amount of thrombin generated (endogenous thrombin potential) and its degradation, this in vitro technique, apart from being impractical and complex, has the drawback of excluding platelets, which not only serve as a scaffold for coagulation but also play an active role in the process. Point-of-care coagulation-monitoring devices assessing the viscoelastic properties of whole blood, that is, thromboelastography (TEG, Haemonetics Corporation, Braintree, MA, USA), rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Pentapharm GmbH, Munich, Germany), and the Sonoclot coagulation and platelet function analyzer or Sonoclot (Sienco Inc., Arvada, CO, USA), have the advantage of being able to characterize the entire clotting process, starting with fibrin formation to clot retraction and fibrinolysis at the patient’s bedside. Furthermore, the coagulation status of patients is assessed in whole blood, allowing the plasmatic coagulation system to interact with platelets and red cells, and thereby providing useful additional information on platelet function [106]. Thus, such global tests are able to better characterize anticoagulation as well as procoagulation components of hemostasis [107] since they provide a composite analysis that reflects function of plasma, blood cells, and platelets. Whereas the Sonoclot and ROTEM measure changes in impedance to movement of a vibrating probe immersed in a blood sample, TEG utilizes an oscillating cup with a fixed probe or piston. The probe is a torsion wire in TEG technology, whereas an optical detector is used by the ROTEM, and all three instruments measure the rate of fibrin formation, clot strength, and clot lysis [108, 109]. Moreover, thromboelastography provides a more adequate characterization of hypofibrinogenemia and hyperfibrinolysis [110] than the clot lysis time and global fibrinolysis capacity [21•]. At present, ROTEM™ or TEG™ may be useful in guiding direct therapeutic interventions in the actual case of bleeding [111••]; TEG is in fact used to guide therapy during liver transplantation in many centers [112–114] and is gaining importance in the assessment of liver-disease associated hemostasis alterations [115, 116], with a possible role in predicting variceal rebleeding [32] and guiding preprocedural
Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18
transfusions [117]. However, although most studies suggest that TEG provides a better assessment of bleeding risk than standard tests of hemostasis in patients with liver disease, it should be emphasized that no studies have directly tested this possibility. Thus, these tests are not yet standardized, validated, or used outside the research scenario, making it still premature to propose them as routine alternatives to the unquestionably inadequate traditional tests. Prospective randomized trials using global assays are needed to assess bleeding risk after invasive procedures [118], since at present, actual prediction or estimation of bleeding risk is not yet feasible. Sonoclot, useful in diagnosing systemic fibrinolysis although it may not reflect localized clot breakdown by plasmin, has shown promising results in cirrhosis, but still needs to be extensively studied [119]. A novel technique, sonorheometry, unlike existing methods, is able to assess mechanical properties of coagulation with minimal disturbance to the delicate structure of a forming thrombus, using acoustic radiation force to produce small, localized displacements within the sample [120, 121]. This whole blood assay seems to adequately reflect thrombotic tendency [120], whereas bleeding tendency, especially in cirrhosis patients, has not yet been studied.
15 Compliance with Ethics Guidelines Conflict of Interest Alberto Zanetto, Marco Senzolo, Alberto Ferrarese, Paolo Simioni, Patrizia Burra, and Kryssia I. Rodríguez-Castro declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance 1.
2.
3.
Conclusions Routine laboratory tests do not reliably predict the risk of bleeding, and there is yet no optimal management strategy to foretell potential bleeding complications. Moreover, it is clear that the assessment of bleeding risk must be performed based not only on laboratory tests (which can be more or less complex and/or closer to the actual in vivo status) but also on clinical parameters, including severity of liver disease as described by the Child score, the presence of portal hypertension (especially for abdominal surgical procedures), but even more importantly, the presence of ongoing infection, endotoxemia, and uremia. The prediction of bleeding risk in the context of cirrhosis is therefore more theoretical—with the present state of knowledge; thus, preventive measures such as repletion of coagulation factors should be abandoned. Rather, the adequate approach is probably to direct hemostatic interventions to the bleeding patient, rather than to Btreating^ altered coagulation parameters [122]. In conclusion, assessing bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis is not a straightforward matter. Many local as well as systemic factors interact dynamically, most of which are determined by the severity of the underlying liver disease, but which are also modulated by factors such as concomitant infections and intravascular pressure. The lack of a single test which can adequately characterize the actual hemostatic status, and even less so the associated bleeding risk, illustrates the complex, multifactorial, and dynamic aspects of hemostasis in cirrhosis.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Lu S-N, Wang J-H, Liu S-L, Hung C-H, Chen C-H, Tung H-D, et al. Thrombocytopenia as a surrogate for cirrhosis and a marker for the identification of patients at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2212–22. Qamar AA, Grace ND, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Burroughs AK, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and clinical significance of abnormal hematologic indices in compensated cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(6):689–95. Ishikawa T, Ichida T, Matsuda Y, Sugitani S, Sugiyama M, Kato T, et al. Reduced expression of thrombopoietin is involved in thrombocytopenia in human and rat liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13(9):907–13. Peck-Radosavljevic M, Wichlas M, Zacherl J, Stiegler G, Stohlawetz P, Fuchsjäger M, et al. Thrombopoietin induces rapid resolution of thrombocytopenia after orthotopic liver transplantation through increased platelet production. Blood. 2000;95:795–801. Aster RH. Pooling of platelets in the spleen: role in the pathogenesis of Bhypersplenic^ thrombocytopenia. J Clin Invest. 1966;45(5):645–57. Wang C-S, Yao W-J, Wang S-T, Chang T-T, Chou P. Strong association of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and thrombocytopenia: implications from a survey of a community with hyperendemic HCV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:790–6. García-Suárez J, Burgaleta C, Hernanz N, Albarran F, Tobaruela P, Alvarez-Mon M. HCV-associated thrombocytopenia: clinical characteristics and platelet response after recombinant alpha2binterferon therapy. Br J Haematol. 2000;110(1):98–103. Bleibel W, Caldwell SH, Curry MP, Northup PG. Peripheral platelet count correlates with liver atrophy and predicts long-term mortality on the liver transplant waiting list. Transpl Int. 2013;26(4):435–42. Ordinas A, Escolar G, Cirera I, Viñas M, Cobo F, Bosch J, et al. Existence of a platelet-adhesion defect in patients with cirrhosis independent of hematocrit: studies under flow conditions. Hepatology. 1996;24(5):1137–42. Mannucci PM, Canciani MT, Forza I, Lussana F, Lattuada A, Rossi E. Changes in health and disease of the metalloprotease that cleaves von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2001;98(9):2730–5. Lisman T, Bongers TN, Adelmeijer J, Janssen HLA, de Maat MPM, de Groot PG, et al. Elevated levels of von Willebrand Factor in cirrhosis support platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity. Hepatology. 2006;44(1):53–61. Hollestelle MJ, Geertzen HGM, Straatsburg IH, van Gulik TM, van Mourik JA. Factor VIII expression in liver disease. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91(2):267–75.
16 13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.•
22. 23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18 Ferro D, Quintarelli C, Lattuada A, Leo R, Alessandroni M, Mannucci PM, et al. High plasma levels of von Willebrand factor as a marker of endothelial perturbation in cirrhosis: relationship to endotoxemia. Hepatology. 1996;23(6):1377–83. Violi F, Leo R, Vezza E, Basili S, Cordova C, Balsano F. Bleeding time in patients with cirrhosis: relation with degree of liver failure and clotting abnormalities. C.A.L.C. Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Cirrhosis Study Group. J Hepatol. 1994;20(4):531–6. Amitrano L, Guardascione MA, Brancaccio V, Balzano A. Coagulation disorders in liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22(1):83–96. Lisman T, Leebeek FW, Mosnier LO, Bouma BN, Meijers JC, Janssen HL, et al. Thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor deficiency in cirrhosis is not associated with increased plasma fibrinolysis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(1):131–9. Huber K, Kirchheimer JC, Korninger C, Binder BR. Hepatic synthesis and clearance of components of the fibrinolytic system in healthy volunteers and in patients with different stages of liver cirrhosis. Thromb Res. 1991;62(5):491–500. vanDeWater L, Carr JM, Aronson D, McDonagh J. Analysis of elevated fibrin(ogen) degradation product levels in patients with liver disease. Blood. 1986;67(5):1468–73. Szczepański M, Habior A, Szczepanik A, Soszka A, Grel K. Thrombin clotting time and fibrin polymerization in liver cirrhosis. Mater Med Pol. 26(3):87–90. Green G, Thomson JM, Dymock IW, Poller L. Abnormal fibrin polymerization in liver disease. Br J Haematol. 1976;34(3):427–39. Rijken DC, Kock EL, Guimarães AHC, Talens S, Darwish Murad S, Janssen HLA, et al. Evidence for an enhanced fibrinolytic capacity in cirrhosis as measured with two different global fibrinolysis tests. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(10):2116–22. Comment: In cirrhosis the question whether there is hyperfibrinolysis or not has been for long debated; this study illustrates different methods to determine this phenomenon in cirrhosis. Mammen EF. Coagulopathies of liver disease. Clin Lab Med. 1994;14(4):769–80. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, Quintarelli C, Musca A, Cordova C, et al. Hyperfibrinolysis resulting from clotting activation in patients with different degrees of cirrhosis. The CALC Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Liver Cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1993;17(1):78–83. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, Quintarelli C, Saliola M, Alessandri C, et al. Hyperfibrinolysis increases the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1992;15(4):672–6. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO, Atterbury CE, Glickman M. Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 5(3):419–24. Violi F, Basili S, Raparelli V, Chowdary P, Gatt A, Burroughs AK. Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer from primary haemostatic defects? Fact or fiction? J Hepatol. 2011; 1415–27. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353: 2254–61. Groszmann RJ, Bosch J, Grace ND, Conn HO, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M, et al. Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1990; 1401–7 D’Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(5): 1611–24. Piscaglia F, Siringo S, Hermida RC, Legnani C, Valgimigli M, Donati G, et al. Diurnal changes of fibrinolysis in patients with
liver cirrhosis and esophageal varices. Hepatology. 2000;31(2): 349–57. 31. Goulis J, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Bacterial infection in the pathogenesis of variceal bleeding. Lancet. 1999;353(9147):139–42. 32. Chau TN, Chan YW, Patch D, Tokunaga S, Greenslade L, Burroughs AK. Thrombelastographic changes and early rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding. Gut. 1998;43(2):267–71. 33. Montalto P, Vlachogiannakos J, Cox DJ, Pastacaldi S, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Bacterial infection in cirrhosis impairs coagulation by a heparin effect: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2002;37(4): 463–70. 34. Senzolo M, Coppell J, Cholongitas E, Riddell A, Triantos CK, Perry D, et al. The effects of glycosaminoglycans on coagulation: a thromboelastographic study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007;18(3):227–36. 35. Zambruni A, Thalheimer U, Coppell J, Riddell A, Mancuso A, Leandro G, et al. Endogenous heparin-like activity detected by anti-Xa assay in infected cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:830–6. 36. Hou M-C, Lin H-C, Liu T-T, Kuo BI-T, Lee F-Y, Chang F-Y, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis after endoscopic therapy prevents rebleeding in acute variceal hemorrhage: a randomized trial. Hepatology. 2004;39(3):746–53. 37. Vincent J-L, Yagushi A, Pradier O. Platelet function in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(5 Suppl):S313–7. 38. Vieira da Rocha EC, D’Amico EA, Caldwell SH, Flores da Rocha TR, Soares E Silva CSS, Dos Santos Bomfim V, et al. A prospective study of conventional and expanded coagulation indices in predicting ulcer bleeding after variceal band ligation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(9):988–93. 39. Venkatesh PGK, Parasa S, Njei B, Sanaka MR, Navaneethan U. Increased mortality with peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(4):605–14.e3. 40. González-González JA, García-Compean D, Vázquez-Elizondo G, Garza-Galindo A, Jáquez-Quintana JO, Maldonado-Garza H. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clinical features, outcomes and predictors of in-hospital mortality. A prospective study. Ann Hepatol. 10(3):287–95. 41. Siringo S, Bolondi L, Piscaglia F, Gaetani M, Misitano B, Carbone C, et al. Peptic ulcer in patients with liver cirrhosis: a retrospective endoscopic and clinical study. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;29(1):62–8. 42. Siringo S, Burroughs AK, Bolondi L, Muia A, Di Febo G, Miglioli M, et al. Peptic ulcer and its course in cirrhosis: an endoscopic and clinical prospective study. J Hepatol. 1995;22(6):633–41. 43. Zullo A, Hassan C, Morini S. Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with liver cirrhosis: facts and fictions. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35(3):197–205. 44. Fraser AG, Pounder RE, Burroughs AK. Gastric secretion and peptic ulceration in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1993;19(1):171–82. 45. Kitano S, Dolgor B. Does portal hypertension contribute to the pathogenesis of gastric ulcer associated with liver cirrhosis? J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(2):79–86. 46. Tsugawa K, Jones MK, Akahoshi T, Moon WS, Maehara Y, Hashizume M, et al. Abnormal PTEN expression in portal hypertensive gastric mucosa: a key to impaired PI 3-kinase/Akt activation and delayed injury healing? FASEB J. 2003;17(15):2316–8. 47. Calatayud S, Ramírez MC, Sanz MJ, Moreno L, Hernández C, Bosch J, et al. Gastric mucosal resistance to acute injury in experimental portal hypertension. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132(1):309–17. 48. Afessa B, Kubilis PS. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: clinical course and mortality prediction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(2):484–9.
Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18 49.
Vlachogiannakos J, Sklavos P, Viazis N, Manolakopoulos S, Markoglou C, Kougioumtzian A, et al. Long-term prognosis of cirrhotics with an upper gastrointestinal bleeding episode: does infection play a role? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(8 Pt 2): e438–44. 50. D’Amico G, De Franchis R. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38(3):599–612. 51. Thabut D, D’Amico G, Tan P, De Franchis R, Fabricius S, Lebrec D, et al. Diagnostic performance of Baveno IV criteria in cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: analysis of the F7 liver-1288 study population. J Hepatol. 2010;53(6):1029–34. 52. Odelowo OO, Smoot DT, Kim K. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8): 712–5. 53. Svoboda P, Ehrmann J, Klvana P, Machytka E, Rydlo M, Hrabovský V. A different view of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in liver cirrhosis patients. Vnitr Lek. 2010;56(11): 1116–21. 54. Kluft C, Nieuwenhuis HK, Rijken DC, Groeneveld E, Wijngaards G, van Berkel W, et al. alpha 2-Antiplasmin Enschede: dysfunctional alpha 2-antiplasmin molecule associated with an autosomal recessive hemorrhagic disorder. J Clin Invest. 1987;80(5): 1391–400. 55. Lee MH, Vosburgh E, Anderson K, McDonagh J. Deficiency of plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 results in hyperfibrinolytic bleeding. Blood. 1993;81(9):2357–62. 56. Benigni A, Boccardo P, Galbusera M, Monteagudo J, De Marco L, Remuzzi G, et al. Reversible activation defect of the platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex in patients with uremia. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;22(5):668–76. 57. Escolar G, Cases A, Bastida E, Garrido M, López J, Revert L, et al. Uremic platelets have a functional defect affecting the interaction of von Willebrand factor with glycoprotein IIb-IIIa. Blood. 1990;76(7):1336–40. 58. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2(2):165–73. 59.•• Lisman T, Caldwell SH, Burroughs AK, Northup PG, Senzolo M, Stravitz RT, et al. Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: the ups and downs. J Hepatol 2010; 362–71. Comment: provides a clear and unabridged view of hemostasis and thrombosis in cirrhosis. 60. Tripodi A, Mannucci PM. Abnormalities of hemostasis in chronic liver disease: reappraisal of their clinical significance and need for clinical and laboratory research. J Hepatol. 2007;46(4):727–33. 61.•• Tripodi A, Primignani M, Mannucci PM. Abnormalities of hemostasis and bleeding in chronic liver disease: the paradigm is challenged. Intern Emerg Med. 2010;5(1):7–12. Comment: Provides a documented overview of the alterations in cirrhosis, challenging past notions and pondering new evidence. 62.•• Giannini EG, Greco A, Marenco S, Andorno E, Valente U, Savarino V. Incidence of bleeding following invasive procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia and advanced liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(10):899–902. quiz e109. Comment: This is one of few studies in which actual incidence of bleeding is analyzed according to thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis. 63. Sharma P, McDonald GB, Banaji M. The risk of bleeding after percutaneous liver biopsy: relation to platelet count. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1982;4(5):451–3. 64. Janssen HL. Changing perspectives in portal vein thrombosis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2000;69–73. 65. Tripodi A, Primignani M, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Dell’Era A, Fabris F, et al. Thrombin generation in patients with cirrhosis: the role of platelets. Hepatology. 2006;44(2):440–5.
17 66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.•
77.
78.
79. 80. 81.
82.
83.
84.
De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, Morard I, Bresson-Hadni S, Torres F, et al. Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(8):906–9. Pache I, Bilodeau M. Severe haemorrhage following abdominal paracentesis for ascites in patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21(5):525–9. Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, Simon JA, Melton CA, Ott BJ, et al. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology. 2004;40(2):484–8. Lin C-H, Chen S-C, Ko PC-I. Preprocedure coagulation tests are unnecessary before abdominal paracentesis in emergency departments. Hepatology. 2005;41(2):402–3. Drastich P, Lata J, Petrtyl J, Bruha R, Prochazka V, Vanasek T, et al. Endoscopic variceal band ligation compared with propranolol for prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding. Ann Hepatol. 10(2):142–9. Lo G-H, Chen W-C, Wang H-M, Lee C-C. Controlled trial of ligation plus nadolol versus nadolol alone for the prevention of first variceal bleeding. Hepatology. 2010;52(1):230–7. Gimson AE, Ramage JK, Panos MZ, Hayllar K, Harrison PM, Williams R, et al. Randomised trial of variceal banding ligation versus injection sclerotherapy for bleeding oesophageal varices. Lancet. 1993;342(8868):391–4. Laine L, el-Newihi HM, Migikovsky B, Sloane R, Garcia F. Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(1):1–7. Norberto L, Polese L, Cillo U, Grigoletto F, Burroughs AK, Neri D, et al. A randomized study comparing ligation with propranolol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in candidates for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13(9):1272–8. Coffin CS, Shaheen AAM, Burak KW, Myers RP. Pregnancy outcomes among liver transplant recipients in the United States: a nationwide case-control analysis. Liver Transpl. 2010;16(1):56–63. Perdigão JPV, de Almeida PC, Rocha TDS, Mota MRL, Soares ECS, Alves APNN, et al. Postoperative bleeding after dental extraction in liver pretransplant patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(3):e177–84. Comment: Although bleeding from dental extractions are perceived as a common complication in patients with cirrhosis, few studies, including this one, actually dimension the problem. Segal JB, Dzik WH. Paucity of studies to support that abnormal coagulation test results predict bleeding in the setting of invasive procedures: an evidence-based review. Transfusion. 2005;45: 1413–25. Fisher NC, Mutimer DJ. Central venous cannulation in patients with liver disease and coagulopathy—a prospective audit. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:481–5. Burroughs AK DL. Liver biopsy. In: Gastroenterological endoscopy. New York: Thieme, 2002. Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26(5):388–93. Grant A, Neuberger J. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 1999;45 Suppl 4:V1–11. Gilmore IT, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyon IM, Williams R, Jenkins D, Hopkins A. Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut. 1995;36(3):437–41. McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1990;99(5):1396–400. Wolff DC, Weber F, Palascak I, et al. Role of the template bleeding time in predicting bleeding complications of percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1995;22:509A.
18 85.
86.
87.
88.••
89. 90.
91.
92.
93. 94.
95.
96. 97. 98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
Curr Hepatology Rep (2015) 14:9–18 Blake JC, Sprengers D, Grech P, McCormick PA, McIntyre N, Burroughs AK. Bleeding time in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. BMJ. 1990;301(6742):12–5. Suman A, Barnes DS, Zein NN, Levinthal GN, Connor JT, Carey WD. Predicting outcome after cardiac surgery in patients with cirrhosis: a comparison of Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:719–23. Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH, Awad SS. Child-TurcottePugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg. 2004;188: 580–3. De Goede B, Klitsie PJ, Lange JF, Metselaar HJ, Kazemier G. Morbidity and mortality related to non-hepatic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;26(1):47–59. Comment: This manuscript provides actual data, summarized in the form of a systematic review, regarding actual adverse events in non-hepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Shaikh AR, Muneer A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients. JSLS. 2009;13:592–6. Ikeda Y, Kanda T, Kosugi S-I, Yajima K, Matsuki A, Suzuki T, et al. Gastric cancer surgery for patients with liver cirrhosis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;1(1):49–55. Kao H-K, Chang K-P, Ching W-C, Tsao C-K, Cheng M-H, Wei FC. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of head and neck cancers in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing surgical resection followed by microsurgical free tissue transfer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:536–43. Lu M-S, Liu Y-H, Wu Y-C, Kao C-L, Liu H-P, Hsieh M-J. Is it safe to perform esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients combined with liver cirrhosis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:423–5. Muilenburg DJ, Singh A, Torzilli G, Khatri VP. Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Anesthesiol Clin. 2009;27:721–37. Porte RJ. Coagulation and fibrinolysis in orthotopic liver transplantation: current views and insights. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1993;19(3):191–6. Perkins L, Jeffries M, Patel T. Utility of preoperative scores for predicting morbidity after cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(12):1123–8. Patel T. Surgery in the patient with liver disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(6):593–9. Friedman LS. The risk of surgery in patients with liver disease. Hepatology. 1999;29(6):1617–23. Garrison RN, Cryer HM, Howard DA, Polk HC. Clarification of risk factors for abdominal operations in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 1984;199(6):648–55. Chen C-C, Hsu P-W, Lee S-T, Chang C-N, Wei K-C, Wu C-T, et al. Brain surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(2):348–53. An Y, Xiao YB, Zhong QJ. Open-heart surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis: indications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:67–74. Murashita T, Komiya T, Tamura N, Sakaguchi G, Kobayashi T, Furukawa T, et al. Preoperative evaluation of patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing open heart surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57:293–7. Hayashida N, Shoujima T, Teshima H, Yokokura Y, Takagi K, Tomoeda H, et al. Clinical outcome after cardiac operations in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:500–5. Townsend JC, Heard R, Powers ER, Reuben A. Usefulness of international normalized ratio to predict bleeding complications in patients with end-stage liver disease who undergo cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(7):1062–5.
104. 105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110. 111.••
112.
113. 114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
MacLennan S, Williamson LM. Risks of fresh frozen plasma and platelets. J Trauma. 2006;60:S46–50. Hemker HC, Giesen P, Al Dieri R, Regnault V, de Smedt E, Wagenvoord R, et al. Calibrated automated thrombin generation measurement in clotting plasma. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003;33(1):4–15. Ganter MT, Hofer CK. Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1366–75. Tripodi A, Salerno F, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Cazzaniga M, Primignani M, et al. Evidence of normal thrombin generation in cirrhosis despite abnormal conventional coagulation tests. Hepatology. 2005;41:553–8. Lisman T, Porte RJ, Leebeek FWG, Caldwell SH. Methodological issues with coagulation testing in patients with liver disease. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(9):2061–2. Lang T, Johanning K, Metzler H, Piepenbrock S, Solomon C, Rahe-Meyer N, et al. The effects of fibrinogen levels on thromboelastometric variables in the presence of thrombocytopenia. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):751–8. Tripodi A. Tests of coagulation in liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2009;13(1):55–61. Saner FH, Gieseler RK, Akz H, Canbay A, Görlinger K. Delicate balance of bleeding and thrombosis in end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation. Digestion. 2013; 135–44. Comment: From a liver surgeon’s point of view, this manuscript illustrates the importance of monitoring coagulation and using these tests to tailor blood product use. Krzanicki D, Sugavanam A, Mallett S. Intraoperative hypercoagulability during liver transplantation as demonstrated by thromboelastography. Liver Transplant. 2013;19:852–61. Salooja N, Perry DJ. Thrombelastography. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2001;12:327–37. Wang SC, Shieh JF, Chang KY, Chu YC, Liu CS, Loong CC, et al. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion decreases intraoperative blood transfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation: randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:2590–3. Ben-Ari Z, Panagou M, Patch D, Bates S, Osman E, Pasi J, et al. Hypercoagulability in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis evaluated by thrombelastography. J Hepatol. 1997;26(3):554–9. Senzolo M, Cholongitas E, Thalheimer U, Riddell A, Agarwal S, Mallett S, et al. Heparin-like effect in liver disease and liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2009; 43–53. De Pietri L, Bianchini M, Montalti R, De Maria N, Di Maira T, Begliomini B, et al. Thrombelastography (TEG) decreases blood products requirement before invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients with coagulation tests derangement. A randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:e5–6. Stravitz RT. Potential applications of thromboelastography in patients with acute and chronic liver disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2012;8(8):513–20. Saxena P, Bihari C, Rastogi A, Agarwal S, Anand L, Sarin SK. Sonoclot signature analysis in patients with liver disease and its correlation with conventional coagulation studies. Adv Hematol. 2013;2013:237351. Viola F, Kramer MD, Lawrence MB, Oberhauser JP, Walker WF. Sonorheometry: a noncontact method for the dynamic assessment of thrombosis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32(5):696–705. Mauldin FW, Viola F, Hamer TC, Ahmed EM, Crawford SB, Haverstick DM, et al. Adaptive force sonorheometry for assessment of whole blood coagulation. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411(9–10):638–44. Blonski W, Siropaides T, Reddy KR. Coagulopathy in liver disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2007; 464–73.