The avian inflammatory response to intraperitoneal. (i.p.) Sephadex injection produces macrophages which display characteristics of an increasingly activated.
Journal
Avian
Inflammatory
of Leukocyte
Macrophage
Biology
Function:
Arachidonic Acid Metabolism, Respiratory Cell-Surface Phenotype During the Response K.A.
Golemboski, Institute Poultry
S. Shaw,
J. Whelan,
J.E. Kinsella,
48:495-501
(1990)
Shifts in Burst, and to Sephadex
and R.R. Dietert
for Comparative and Environmental Toxicology (K.A.G., R.R.D.), and Avian Sciences (K.A.G., 5.5., R.R.D.), and Institute of Food J.E.K.), Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Department of Science (J.W.,
The avian inflammatory response to intraperitoneal (i.p.) Sephadex injection produces macrophages which display characteristics of an increasingly activated state over time. We examined elicited chicken peritoneal exudate cells (PEC5) with respect to superoxide anion production, arachidonic acid metabolism and cell surface Ia and transferrin receptor (TfR) expression from 4 to 96 h after i.p. stimulation. Avian PECs showed the highest level of superoxide release when harvested just 4 h after injection, and did not produce PGE2 or 6-keto PGF1,. Early (4-h) PECs produced elevated amounts of thromboxane as compared to later (42-h) macrophages. Expression of both ha and TfR Increased between 4 and 24 h after Sephadex stimulation; TfR remained elevated through 96 h, but Ia declined after 42 h. Some aspects of chicken macrophage regulation of superoxide anion, thromboxane release, and surface antigen expression are in contrast with those reported for mouse macrophages. Key words:
inflammation, chicken, ide anion, thromboxane
class
II glycoproteins,
INTRODUCTION Macrophages virtue
play
of their
gen-specific by,
and
dual
a pivotal role
(acquired) regulators
role
immunity. of,
the
to the stimulus cells, macrophages
new
capabilities,
of their cell which in turn other
These
acid antigen
ability to kill not be mutually tance of each stimulus, the
They
are
itself
by
and both
anti-
altered
response.
As
change
the
antigenic
functions,
metabolites presentation
microorganisms exclusive;
[1]. study,
secretion
of
and reactive oxygen interto lymphocytes, and the and/or however,
may vary, dependent kinetics of the resulting
species of origin In the present
including
tumor cells, may the relative imporon the nature of the response, and the
(Sephadex
macrophages injection G-50)
© 1990 Wiley-Liss,
we
extend
our
observations
[19]. In this model of a crosslinked
is used to elicit an inflammatory
Inc.
equivalent
mammalian
on
system, Dextran pop-
of the
cyte) [2,20]. responding
Recruitment macrophages
changes largely
primarily of of heterophils
macrophages, (the avian
polymorphonuclear
consistent to
superox-
leuko-
is rapid and extensive, show morphological with
initiation
by
pathway of complement have described the kinetics
progressive
Sephadex
fixation of the
and
and the func-
activation, of
the
alternate
[7]. Previous studies cellular response [ 1 1]
and the acquisition of phagocytic and microbicidal activity [8,18]. In addition, changes in antigen expression that were dependent on the eliciting agent and the time after stimulation were detected among chicken peritoneal macrophages using specific monoclonal antibodies [24]. This
study
examined
Sephadex-elicited face expression class
the inflammatory response in an avian model, the White Leghorn chicken. The chicken provides a particularly convenient animal in which to study macrophages, because of the absence of significant numbers of harvestable resident intraperitoneal
composed component
due
profile
receptor,
ulation of cells with a smaller
tional
and to the products progressively acquire
surface, and secrete a series of products may up- or down-regulate the activities of
leukocytes.
arachidonic mediates,
protection,
(innate)
inflammatory
they are exposed of surrounding functional
in host
in nonspecific
transferrin
II (Ia)
MHC
and the production ucts, arachidonic
Received Reprint Sciences,
the
time-dependent
macrophages of functionally
March requests: Cornell
antigens,
changes
in
with respect to cell relevant markers,
surthe
and
the
transferrin
receptor,
of two categories of secretory acid metabolites and superoxide
13, 1990; Rodney
accepted
R. Dietert,
University,
28, 1990.
March Department
Ithaca, NY
prodanion.
14853.
of Poultry
and
Avian
496
Golemboski
The
same
et al.
parameters
transformed
were
chicken
also
measured
using
macrophage-like
cell
a virus-
line,
at
HD1
1.
The results provide an overview of changes in the chicken macrophage during the activation process and offer insight into possible regulatory mechanisms.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
used
Cornell
in each
housed
K strain
experiment
White at 4-5
in thermostatically
batteries [22] and
Leghorn weeks
were
Cells
The
HD1
Birds
were
raised
wire
grow
Graf.
C ration)
and
Reagents The
following
, St.
Co. paque
were
Louis,
obtained
MO:
(Ficoll-Hypaque),
ferricytochrome Heparin,
fetal
and
bovine
serum,
Grove, (FITC) fled). from
was
PA) was labeled
Grand NY.
Exudate were
serum,
assay CA).
(SOD). Medium and
Cell
harvested
(PGE2, Seragen
(PEC) as
Co. an-
BiotechnolLabs (West
1 cell
cells
traperitoneally
(i.p.)
cific intervals PECs were with 30 ml heparin.
(dry
6-keto (Boston,
PGF1a, MA).
at 1 ml/l00
and
g body
were
phosphate-buffered
washed saline
twice (pH
7.2;
with PBS)
saline
injected
weight.
in-
At spe-
cold prior
0. 15
M
to further
analysis.
Peripheral Blood EDTA
Blood was
pooled from were separated
Monocytes
obtained
as anticoagulant.
by
brachial
Equal
each of two birds. by centrifugation
volumes
of
macrophage-like are
loosely
T.
morphology
adherent
[4]
HD 1 1
.
Cytometry
transferrin
from flasks by vigorous in PBS prior to analysis.
shaking
and
of Ia antigens
and
venipuncture of blood
with were
Mononuclear leukocytes through Ficoll-Hypaque
Analysis cell
surface
receptor,
HD1 1 cells were I :2 in PBS) to
expression
aliquots
of
1-3
exposed to normal block nonspecific
followed
tein encoded (1:200 dilution Dr.
0.
by
by
two
x
PECs
106
goat serum secondary
washed
the B-L of ascites
Vainio),
which
on the
supernatant)
postinjection, the birds were sacrificed and obtained by flushing the peritoneal cavity of cold sterile saline containing 0.5 U/mI
Cells
transformation
with avian myelocytomatosis of Dr. K. Klasing and Dr.
Flow
terminant
[18].
(0.75%)
solution
by
in PBS.
or
(diluted antibody
Cells
were
then reacted with one of three monoclonal antibodies a volume of 250 l: C-Ia, which reacts with a glycopro-
obtained kits
described
physiological
W/V)
by
removed
were removed washed twice
reacts
B-L
[32],
region fluid)
of [10], with
molecule
or JS8
the chicken MHC 21-1A6 (a gift of a monomorphic
(undiluted
(1:2
in
dilution
de-
tissue
culture
of supernatant),
a
generous gift of Dr. M.J. Hayman. JS8 specifically recognizes the chicken transfemn receptor [2 1] . After 30 mm at 0#{176}C, cells were washed 3 times with PBS and then
flow cytometry aliquots exposed
of sterile
a 3%
were
Cells were
propriate
volume
were
were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s me(DMEM), with the addition of 8% fetal bovine and 2% chicken serum at 37#{176}C,with 5% CO,.
exposed
provide
obtained cells gift
and
Cells
cells dium serum
Sephadex G-50 super fine was weighed, then preswollen in double-distilled water overnight. After 2 washes with water, the Sephadex pellet was resuspended in the apto
cells
exhibit
cytochemistry
by trypan
95%.
prior to analysis. Monocytes at 37#{176}C,5% CO2. for 2 h,
line,
These
binding,
Collection
previously
as determined exceeded
nonadherent
bone marrow was a generous
To quantitate
chicken
Island Biological C-Ia, monoclonal
reagents were Radioimmunoassay
Viability, always
(PMA),
the source for fluorescein-isothiocyanate goat antimouse IgG/IgM (affinity-puri-
for arachidonic acid metabolites and TXB,) were purchased from
PECs
acetate
from Southern AL. Jackson
Dye-binding protein Bio-Rad (Richmond,
Peritoneal
Histo-
dismutase Eagle’s
goat
purchased Birmingham,
Chemical
EDTA,
myristic
superoxide Modified
serum were obtained from (GIBCO), Grand Island, tichicken Ia, ogy Associates,
Sigma
G-50-50,
phorbol
C, Dulbecco’s
(DMEM),
from
Sephadex
mm.
time
HD11
of age.
day length. Feed (Cornell provided ad libitum.
20
exclusion,
after which washing.
chicken virus,
controlled
with a 15-hr water were
chickens
for
dye
washed 3 times in PBS were isolated by adherence
Birds Female
lOOg
blue
to the
secondary
antibody,
antimouse IgG/IgM (diluted utes on ice. Cells were washed
antibody.
analysis. Controls only to goat serum
Samples
son Fluorescent (Becton Dickinson, a 488
nm
FITC-labeled
1:50 in PBS), 3 times with
argon-ion
were
analyzed
Activated Mountain laser
were and
with
Cell View, (Spectra
goat
for 30 mmPBS prior to duplicate cell the secondary
a Becton
sorter, CA)
Dickin-
Model equipped
440 with
and
a four
Physics)
decade logarithmic amplifier. Data were collected on i0 cells per sample. Discriminators for background fluorescence levels were based on values obtained from control samples. Cell diameters were determined by comparison of time of flight, a measure of cell diameter, with that of standard-size fluorescent eas were calculated [23]. resent ranging
two
or three
from
9 to
latex beads and cell surface Results for each timepoint
separate 16 (HD11,
experiments n
=
with 5).
arrep-
N numbers
Avian Superoxide
Anion
Production ing
procedure
anion
release
with since
that from harvestable
anion
was
of Kitagawa
from
elicited
analyzed
et al.
peripheral resident
Superoxide
was
Briefly,
PEC
samples,
U/ml).
Samples
were
tested
80 (I) .J -J Li
60
in triplicate.
C reduced
verted
by superoxide
to nanomoles
cient 2.1 determined solubilized with the
using
the
tissue to rebuffer C (80 (133
After
anion, molar
1 h of
and
in distilled water Bradford dye-binding
was
extinction
x i04 M’cm. Protein using duplicate (untreated) cell
con-
PECs
Acid
or HD1
by 4-5 freeze-thaw (Coomassie blue)
Metabolite
1 cells
were
1 h at 37#{176}C,5%
moved
by
washing.
C02,
Two
HOll
96
INJECTiON
Statistical
Analysis
Data
were
(ANOVA),
analyzed
cycles, assay,
[6] . Results experiments of 3-6 per
cells ysis
by a one-way
followed
were (data
by
t-test, Results
arc-sine presented
with a probability significant.
analysis
of variance
least-significant
if significance expressed as
difference
was indicated percentage of
by total
transformed prior to statistical analare not transformed). Comparisons value
of < Li
C
0
z
:
>
UU
2.0
C-) m
>
0
1nn
1.0
24
4 HOURS
Fig. 2.
Changes
In intensity
of fluorescence
AFTER
HF
200
42
96
SEPHADEX
HD11
INJECTION
due to ha and TfR
on PECs or HDI I (as determined by flow cytometry) and changes in cell size (as determined by time of flight). MCF index was determined by dividing mean channel fluorescence for positIve samples by that of control samples. Results are cx-
c:: + PMA pressed as mean ± SEM and represent the mean of at least two experiments at each time point. Results of statistical analysis are described under Results. Time-of-flight data were obtained from a single experiment, with n =6 for 4- and 42-hr macrophages, n = 2 for HD1 1 (1O cells/sample).
1500
175
1250
z
EzJ
150
-
PMA
Li I-
0
1000
0’
750
50 A
250
C
25
I PBM
4
24
42
early production
HD11
4
I.P. SEPHADEX
P. SEPHADEX
macrophages
of thromboxane
also
A7 (TXA2;
exhibit
measured
as
production is in contrast to mammalian macrophages [5]. The predominance of TXA2 production may be a characteristic of the response to i.p. Sephadex, since Sephadex-elicited macrophages can produce PGE2 under in vitro culture conditions (K. Kline and B.G. Sanders,
sponsible
for
prostaglandin
It has been reported that macrophages may be largely synthesis,
while
newly
resremi-
HD11
Fig. 4. Thromboxane A2 production (measured as TXB2) by Sephadex-elicited PECs or HD1 I , with and without PMA. ResuIts are expressed as mean ± SEM and represent the mean of two separate experiments, each sample assayed in quadruplicate. Asterisk indicates significant difference from cells not cxposed to PMA.
grated macrophages produce [26]; the lack of prostaglandins
to PMA, without detectable produc(POE2 or PGI, measured as 6absence of detectable prostaglandin
personal communication). ident murine peritoneal
42
HOURS AFTER
inflammatory
TXB2) in response tion of prostaglandins keto-PGF1). The
S
HOURS AFTER
Fig. 3. Superoxide anion production, determined by the superoxide dismutase-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome C, by peripheral blood monocytes, Sephadex-ehicited PECs, or HD1 I. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM and represent the mean of two or more separate experiments at each timepoint, each sample assayed in triplicate. Columns with different letters are significantly different.
The
100
E 75
500
peak
125
a-
the
absence
of
resident
proportionately in our system
peritoneal
more may
macrophages
TXA2 reflect in the
chicken. In the murine system, TXA, is produced at constant levels throughout the inflammatory response [25], while thromboxane production during the avian response to Sephadex decreases after 4 h postinjection. TXA2 is a vasoconstrictor [9], and could play a role in the rapid conclusion of the recruitment period after Sephadex injection by reducing blood flow to the pentoneal region. The regulation of macrophage plex and arachidonic
involves acid
secretory events
multistep pathways. may be mobilized
is com-
In macrophages, from cellular phos-
500
Golemboski
pholipids pendent
in response phospholipase
phospholipase pacity for
to surface A, or
by
factors: an NADPH
Ca2
-dependent
cell
membrane.
therefore
of
increase oxidase
translocation These
both
influx
two
Ca2
ions.
at an
Sephadex. produce tamed
early
Early a Ca2 to
point
promote
shown
via
sive
pathways
that
acid
in our
system,
in the response in PECs that
4 h after
production
as
polymorphonuclear macrophages of superoxide
well
as
production,
may
chicken
and
In-
.
accom-
4 and 24 have been
macrophages
production in part
TfR
expression
PECs
between PGI
by murine
account through
96
by Sepha-
for
the
rapid
in-
remained h after
ele-
Sephadex
the percentage of cells expressing Ia de42 and 96 h. Time-dependent changes in
of Ia expression, 24 and
96 h. This
in contrast,
42 h) and
may
declined
coincide
of
increased
later
to earlier
with
tation activity [31]. The functional profile
which
[3]
were
amount of cell surface Ia and TfR expression may reflect their relative importance at different points in the response-TfR intensity increased between 4 and 24 h, possibly indicating an increased requirement for iron. tween
leukocytes [28]. display a progres-
anion
PECs
Amount
which
dramatically Both PGE2
of prostaglandin
injection, while dined between
i.p.
activation
Ia expression
absence
on
in Ia expression
decreases in TfR expression [14]. described here, however, expression
in Ia expression.
vated
may sus-
to that
the
rise during
antigens increased i.p. Sephadex.
crease
metabolism
the
by concomitant avian system
dex-elicited
require
to Sephadex is sufficiently
preceded
to suppress
[27];
can
are regulated indepenand do not usually reach but both responses
superoxide
deactivation
C to the
processes
arachidonic acid mobilization, analogous results from N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine binding to human Later Sephadex-elicited
panied In the
of protein
kinase
days
in Ia expression
of both h after
Arachidonic
events influx
3-5
creases
in the affinity of a memfor its substrate, and the metabolic
be up-regulated
of
a Ca2 involving
[ 1 3] . The cadepends on at
lipases anion
and superoxide anion production dently in the murine system [29] maximum levels concurrently, peaked
stimuli via a pathway
C and diacylglycerol secretion of superoxide
least two brane-bound
an
et al.
levels
levels
(be-
before
of antigen
presen-
Sephadex-elicited
macro-
may result from changes in the affinity of the membrane oxidase for its substrate [30] , or from the resolution of early events that lead to divalent ion flux, or both. Sim-
phages varies considerably during the course of the inflammatory response. In addition to the changes reported here for Ia, TfR, SO, and TxB, parameters, phagocytic
ilan factors may also be responsible for the thromboxane release later in the response. The regulation of macrophage cell surface
ability phages;
molecules
is also
a complex
interaction factors.
of the Changes
process,
macrophage in antigen
decrease
in
receptors/
dependent
upon
with many expression
also varies among both FcR-mediated
erythrocytes the
extracellular may reflect
(SRBCs)
4 and 42 uptake
and
the
opsonized SRBCs nod [8 , 1 1 1. FcR
increase induction
and
by essentially
is expressed
h Sephadex of opsonized
ability
macrosheep
to phagocytize
un-
dramatically during this begins by 6 h post-Sephadex all macrophages
pe-
at 24 h;
changes in protein synthesis, membrane flow, or turnover rates; quantitative or qualitative alteration of surface phenotype may have both metabolic and functional im-
by contrast, phagocytosis of unopsonized SRBCs is negligible prior to and at 24 h and peaks late in the response. Sephadex-elicited macrophages could ingest opsonized
plications
particles, such as bacteria, while SO production is high, before the optimum time for antigen presentation. Later in the inflammatory response, macrophages have a higher amount of Ia antigens for increased efficiency of
for the cell.
In the present
the induction of two functionally molecules: class II (Ia) glycoproteins receptor The cell
(TfR). transferrmn
to bind
is present
receptor
to and
on proliferating
gens is directly ing cell-cell Clearly, pressing
related contact,
nonimmunologically glycollate) did
the
capacity
[ 15]
to functional especially
is dependent elicited percentage
of the
glycoprotein-bound cells
the nature In murine
tigen expression ulus; macrophages increases in the
cell surface the transferrin
, and
iron; may
processes that involve reaction [2]. Expression
the percentage of these two antigens
could influence at a given time.
we examined
modulates
internalize
an effect on metabolic as the Haber-Weiss
study, relevant and
also
it
have
iron, such of Ia anti-
parameters involvantigen presentation.
penitoneal and their
exudate relative
of the inflammatory systems, regulation on the by Listeria of cells
cells exdensities response of Ia an-
nature of the stimshow substantial expressing Ia, but
mediated responses not enhance Ia expression.
(e.g., A latent
thioperiod
functions
requiring
cell-cell
communication.
It remains murine and
to be seen whether the differences between avian regulation of macrophage function and
cell
antigen
surface
elicited
expression
macrophages,
or
are confined if they
apply
flammatory response as a whole. chicken represents an excellent model examine macrophage metabolism inflammatory response.
to Sephadexto the
In either system
during
avian
in-
case, in which
the to
the course
of an
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge Dr. 0. Vainio of the 21-1 A6 monoclonal antibody-producing
for
and Drs. K. Klasing and T. Graf The excellent technical assistance
1 cell line. Sanders,
for
the HD1 of Forrest
the gift cell line
Avian Joseph Puzzi, tance of Diane was supported gram York
and Belur Lokesh, and the editorial Colf are greatly appreciated. This in part by a Cornell Biotechnology
grant 157-8507, Sea Grant Institute
Hatch grant
157-442,
grant 7917.
assiswork Pro-
and
16.
New
transduction.
Lokesh, lipids
REFERENCES
, ,
1984.
ical
6.
,
regulation
of
,
prostaglandin
and
,
72,248,
leukotriene
production
8. Chu,
Y.
, ,
Immunol.
25,165,
and Dietert,
R.R.
carbohydrate-based
The
,
irritants:
populations. Davis, P.
Dev. Comp. Bailey, P.J.
arachidonic
acid
,
oxygenation
1988.
chicken
macrophage
Temporal
changes
response
,
in pain
and
cell
in avian
blood
leukocyte
populations.
Inflammation
The
role
13.
Hamilton, signal
14.
15.
Eds.).
New
York:
TA.,
and
transduction
Alan
R.
Adams,
in macrophages.
Liss,
DO.
p.
159,
Molecular Immunology
24.
ML.
,
14,31,
Shapiro,
H.M.
Irembicki,
Biol.
of
chicken
peritoneal
macro-
181 .560,
,
, ,
MC.
and
,
Young,
R.J.
26.
Tripp,
during 27.
, , ,
CS.
heterogeneity.
Unanue,
explains
the
Proc.
Soc.
immune
of 31.
NatI.
,
1986b.
NatI.
Tsunawaki,
S.
, ,
in leukocytes
ofoxygen.
J.
Biol.
Sci.
,
Unanue,
ER.,
Belier,
DI.,
by
261,11563,
Veromaa,
I.,
and
Toivanen,
ens
bursectomized
18,225,
1988.
Vainio,
Lu,
0.,
Jalkanen,
P. Expression at
C.Y..
and
on its regulation
60
h
of
and
incubation.
chemoattracta-
and
1986.
Allen,
P.M.
Antigen
and mechanism.
Bu-l
R. dia-
deactivation: Alenzyme after exJ. Exp. Med.
S., Eerola,
of B-L
P. The Ia expresJ. Immu-
1988. of arachidonate
S. and Nathan, CF. Macrophage tered kinetic properties of superoxide-producing posure to tumor cell-conditioned medium. 164,1319, 1986.
Tsunawaki,
U.S.A.
and Snyderman, for sustained
85,1549, Release
Chem.
migra-
metabolism
Acad.
activated
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. and Nathan, CF.
presentation: Comments munol. 132,1, 1984. 32.
P. Monocyte
,
Proc.
.
production
Proc.
reduction
8,151,
response.
Biol.
P. Thromboxane mouse peritoneal
arachidonate
Truett, A.P. Verghese, MW. Dillon, SB. Calcium influx stimulates a second pathway nts.
30.
Needleman,
Exp.
Tripp, CS. Wyche, A. Unanue, E. and Needleman, functional significance of the regulation of macrophage sion by endogenous arachidonate metabolites in vitro.
cylgycerol 29.
and
in macrophage
1986a.
nol. 137,3915, 28.
ER.
the changes
of the
and Dietert, R.R. Monoclonal peritoneal macrophages: Identi-
, ,
macrophage
Nutrition
Press, p. 451, 1969. New York: Alan R.
,
1988.
Qureshi, MA. with chicken
reactive
of
Med.
,
,
1990.
1987. Hamilton, l.A., Weiel, J.E., and Adams, DO. Expression of the transferrin receptor in murine peritoneal macrophages is modulated in the different stages of activation. J. Immunol. 132,2285, 1985. Hirata, I., Bitterman, PB., Mornex, J.-F., and Crystal, R.G. Expression of the transfemn receptor gene during the process of
activation
Exp.
Med. 183,28, 1986. 25. lripp. CS. Leaky, KM. and Needleman, synthase is preferentially conserved in activated macrophages. J. Clin. Invest. 76,898, 1985.
1989. Today
1986.
New York: Humphrey Practical Flow Cytometry.
K.A.
83,9655,
mechanisms
and
Nesheim,
Geneva,
uication
of
12. Golemboski, K.A., Chu, Y., and Dietert, R.R. Cell surface changes in chicken inflammatory macrophages. In Recent Advances in Avian Immunology Research. (Bhogal, B., and Koch, G.,
Scott,
Soc.
Liss, Inc., p. 118,
inflammation.
Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2,335, 1984. Ewert, DL. Munchus, MS. Chen, C.-L.H. and Cooper, M.D. Analysis of structural properties and cellular distribution of avian Ia antigen by using monoclonal antibody to monomorphic determinants. J. Immunol. 132,2525, 1984. 11. Golemboski, K.A., Bloom, SE., and Dietert, R.R. Dynamics of the avian inflammatory response to cross-linked dextran: Changes 10.
Proc.
Chicken.
tion
Immunol. 12, 109, 1988. and Goldenberg, MM. products
to
in peritoneal
Ann.
Dietert,
recruitment
antibodies
M-P. Labarre, D. Jozefowicz, M. and Kazatchkine, M.D. The ability of Sephadex to activate human complement is suppressed in specifically substituted functional Sephadex derivMol.
22. 23.
of Bio-
,
the
136,2605,
and Kinsella, J.E. Alterations in the in mouse spleen following the ingestion Nutr. Metab. 30,357, 1986. R.R. and Bacon, L.D. Genetic variation
prostaglandins
oil.
, ,
H.L.
1986. 19. Rose, EM. and Hesketh, P. Fowl peritoneal exudate cells: Collection and use for the macrophage migration inhibition test. Avian Pathol. 3,297, 1974. 20. Sabet, I. Hsia, L.O. Stanisz, M. El-Domeiri, A. and Van Alien, P. A simple method for obtaining peritoneal macrophage from chickens. J. Immunol. Methods 14,103, 1977. 21 . Schmidt, J.A. Marshall, J. and Hayman, M.J. Identification and characterization of the chicken transferrin receptor. Biochem. J. 232,735, 1985.
by
for the quantitation binding. Anal.
,
1976.
Carreno,
atives.
9.
,
macrophages. J. Leuk. Biol. 35, 1 1984. Bradford, M. A rapid and sensitive method protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye chem.
7.
,
501
,
J. Immunol.
Hsieh,
MA.
phages.
3. Beller, DI. and Ho, K. Regulation of macrophage populations. V. Evaluation of the control of the macrophage Ia expression in vitro. J. Immunol. 129,971, 1982. 4. Beug, H. von Kirchback, A. D#{246}derlein,G. Conscience, J.-F., and Graf, I. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective ALV display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell 18,375, 1979. 5. Bonney, Ri. and Humes, J.F. Physiological and pharmacolog-
,
and
Qureshi, in
1 . Adams, DO. and Hamilton, TA. The cell biology of macrophage activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2,283, 1984. 2. Babior, B. The respiratory burst of phagocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 73,599,
BR.
of menhaden 18.
Metabolism
mononuclear phagocyte maturation. J. Immunol. 136,1 139, 1986. Kitagawa, S. and Johnston, RB. Jr. Deactivation of the respiratory burst in activated macrophages: Evidence for alteration of signal
17.
, , , , , , , , ,
Macrophage
J. lm-
E., Granfors, antigens Eur.
J.
K.,
in chickImmunol.