BioNLP 2008: Current trends in biomedical natural language processing

Download PDF
0 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size Report
Comment
Jun 19, 2008 - to bridge the gap between basic biomedical research, clinical research, ..... Danielle Mowery, Henk Harkema and Wendy Chapman . ...... 1We used a development build of GATE 4.0, downloadable ...... diagnosis may result in an over-coding financial ..... free-texts (radiology reports), biological full papers.
ACL-08: HLT

BioNLP 2008 Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing

Proceedings of the Workshop

June 19, 2008 The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA

Production and Manufacturing by Omnipress Inc. 2600 Anderson Street Madison, WI 53707 USA

Sponsored by:

c

2008 The Association for Computational Linguistics

Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-932432-11-4 ii

Current trends in biomedical natural language processing: the view from computational linguistics Dina Demner-Fushman, Sophia Ananiadou, K. Bretonnel Cohen, John Pestian, Jun’ichi Tsujii, and Bonnie Webber

Background Research in computational linguistics in the biomedical domain traditionally focuses on two major areas: fundamental advances in language processing; and application of language processing methods to bridge the gap between basic biomedical research, clinical research, and translation of both types of research into practice. Several conferences provide opportunities for discussion of these two types of research in specific sub-domains of Biomedical Natural Language Processing. For example, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) and its associated special interest group and Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) focus on NLP research applied to issues of interest to biologists, whereas American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) is concerned with medical informatics issues. Rather than focusing on a specific area of interest, ACL BioNLP workshop strives to provide a forum for any important, new, and exciting research in the field of Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Rather than focusing on a specific theme as we have in previous years, the goal of the workshop this year was to solicit work of interest to NLP researchers on any topic in the biomedical domain.

Submissions, acceptance, and themes Asking researchers to share their interests was rewarded by 34 submissions (5 posters and 19 full papers). Of those, 10 were accepted as full papers and 18 as poster presentations. The combined expertise of the program committee allowed for providing three thorough reviews for each paper. The exceptionally high quality manuscripts accepted for presentation cover a wide area of subjects in clinical and biological areas, as well as methodological issues applicable to both sublanguages. Named entity recognition (NER) continues to be an active area of research. NER research presented here involves development of new statistical and hybrid approaches to identification and disambiguation of gene [1], protein [2], chemical names [3], and clinical entities. Overwhelmingly, researchers chose statistical or hybrid approaches to the tasks at hand. This is probably the reason for growing interest in creation of annotated corpora [4], development of methods for augmenting the existing annotation [5], speeding up the annotation process [5], and reducing its cost; evaluating the comparability of results obtained applying the same methods to different collections [6], And increasing compatibility of different annotations [7]. Increasingly sophisticated relation extraction methods [6, 8] are being applied to a broader set of iii

relations [9]. Other steps towards deeper understanding of the text include methods for creation of gene profiles [10], identification of uncertainty [11], discourse connectivity [12], and temporal features of clinical conditions [13]. The applicability of NLP methods to clinical tasks is explored in the work on identification of language impairments [14] and seriousness of suicidal attempts [15]. Finally, application of NLP methods to classic information retrieval problems such as automatic indexing of biomedical literature [16] and the newer information retrieval problem of image retrieval [17] are explored.

Acknowledgments Organizing the BioNLP workshop is an extremely gratifying experience. We are indebted to the authors who chose to submit their high quality research covering a variety of interesting topics to this workshop. Our main hurdle was the selection of oral presentations, in which we relied on the thoughtful and thorough reviews provided by the program committee. We thank the ACL organizers for their help and clarifications on numerous issues. Last, but not least our thanks go to the workshop sponsors: The Computational Medicine Center and Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and The UK National Centre for Text Mining (NaCTeM).

References [1] Xinglong Wang and Michael Mattews. Species Disambiguation for Biomedical Term Identification. BioNLP 2008. [2] Yutaka Sasaki, Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, John McNaught and Sophia Ananiadou. How to Make the Most of NE Dictionaries in Statistical NER. BioNLP 2008. [3] Peter Corbett and Ann Copestake. Cascaded Classifiers for Confidence-Based Chemical Named Entity Recognition. BioNLP 2008. [4] Gy¨orgy Szarvas, Veronika Vincze, Rich´ard Farkas and J´anos Csirik. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. BioNLP 2008. [5] Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, Jun’ichi Tsujii and Sophia Ananiadou. Accelerating the Annotation of Sparse Named Entities by Dynamic Sentence Selection. BioNLP 2008. [6] Antti Airola, Sampo Pyysalo, Jari Bj¨orne, Tapio Pahikkala, Filip Ginter and Tapio Salakoski. A Graph Kernel for Protein-Protein Interaction Extraction. BioNLP 2008. [7] Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre and Jun’ichi Tsujii. Raising the Compatibility of Heterogeneous Annotations: A Case Study on Protein Mention Recognition. BioNLP 2008.

iv

[8] Barry Haddow. Using Automated Feature Optimisation to Create an Adaptable Relation Extraction System. BioNLP 2008. [9] Angus Roberts, Robert Gaizauskas and Mark Hepple. Extracting Clinical Relationships from Patient Narratives. BioNLP 2008. [10] Catalina O Tudor, K Vijay-Shanker and Carl J Schmidt. Mining the Biomedical Literature for Genic Information. BioNLP 2008. [11] Halil Kilicoglu and Sabine Bergler. Recognizing Speculative Language in Biomedical Research Articles: A Linguistically Motivated Perspective. BioNLP 2008. [12] Hong Yu, Nadya Frid, Susan McRoy, Rashmi Prasad, Alan Lee and Aravind Joshi. A Pilot Annotation to Investigate Discourse Connectivity in Biomedical Text. BioNLP 2008. [13] Danielle Mowery, Henk Harkema and Wendy Chapman. Temporal Annotation of Clinical Text. BioNLP 2008. [14] Thamar Solorio and Yang Liu. Using Language Models to Identify Language Impairment in Spanish-English Bilingual Children. BioNLP 2008. [15] John Pestian, Pawel Matykiewicz, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan, Sarah Arszman Lavanier, Jennifer Combs, and Robert Kowatch. Distinguishing between completer and ideator suicide notes: A comparison of machine learning methods. BioNLP 2008. [16] Aurelie Neveol, Sonya Shooshan and Vincent Claveau. Automatic inference of indexing rules for MEDLINE. BioNLP 2008. [17] Paul Buitelaar, Pinar Oezden Wennerberg and Sonja Zillner. Statistical Term Profiling for Query Pattern Mining. BioNLP 2008. Organizers: Dina Demner-Fushman, US National Library of Medicine Sophia Ananiadou, National Centre for Text Mining and University of Manchester, UK Kevin Bretonnel Cohen, The MITRE Corporation and University of Colorado School of Medicine John Pestian, Computational Medicine Center, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital and Medical Center Jun’ichi Tsujii, University of Tokyo, Japan and University of Manchester, UK Bonnie Webber, University of Edinburgh, UK Program Committee: Alan Aronson, LHNCBC, US National Library of Medicine Catherine Blake, University of North Carolina Olivier Bodenreider, LHNCBC, US National Library of Medicine Bob Carpenter, Alias-i Wendy Chapman, University of Pittsburgh Aaron Cohen, Oregon Health and Science University Nigel Collier, National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo v

Noemie Elhadad, Columbia University Marcelo Fiszman, LHNCBC, US National Library of Medicine Kristofer Franz´en, Swedish Institute of Computer Science Carol Friedman, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons Peter Haug, University of Utah Marti Hearst, University of California at Berkeley Su Jian, A-star Jin-Dong Kim, University of Tokyo Marc Light, Thomson Zhiyong Lu, NCBI, US National Library of Medicine Aurelie Neveol, LHNCBC, US National Library of Medicine Serguei Pakhomov, University of Minnesota Thomas Rindflesch, LHNCBC, US National Library of Medicine Daniel Rubin, Stanford University Hagit Shatkay, Queen’s University, Canada Larry Smith, NCBI, US National Library of Medicine Yuka Tateisi, University of Tokyo Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, University of Manchester Alfonso Valencia, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia Karin Verspoor, Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine Peter White, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia W. John Wilbur, NCBI, US National Library of Medicine Limsoon Wong, National University of Singapore Hong Yu, University of Wisconsin Pierre Zweigenbaum, LIMSI Invited Speakers:

John J. Hutton, MD Senior Vice President, Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Hon S. Pak, MD Chief, Advanced Information Technology Group, Telemedicine & Advanced Technology Research Center (TATRC)

vi

Table of Contents

A Graph Kernel for Protein-Protein Interaction Extraction Antti Airola, Sampo Pyysalo, Jari Bj¨orne, Tapio Pahikkala, Filip Ginter and Tapio Salakoski . . . 1 Extracting Clinical Relationships from Patient Narratives Angus Roberts, Robert Gaizauskas and Mark Hepple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Using Automated Feature Optimisation to Create an Adaptable Relation Extraction System Barry Haddow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Mining the Biomedical Literature for Genic Information Catalina O Tudor, K Vijay-Shanker and Carl J Schmidt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Accelerating the Annotation of Sparse Named Entities by Dynamic Sentence Selection Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, Jun’ichi Tsujii and Sophia Ananiadou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts Gy¨orgy Szarvas, Veronika Vincze, Rich´ard Farkas and J´anos Csirik . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Recognizing Speculative Language in Biomedical Research Articles: A Linguistically Motivated Perspective Halil Kilicoglu and Sabine Bergler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Cascaded Classifiers for Confidence-Based Chemical Named Entity Recognition Peter Corbett and Ann Copestake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 How to Make the Most of NE Dictionaries in Statistical NER Yutaka Sasaki, Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, John McNaught and Sophia Ananiadou . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Species Disambiguation for Biomedical Term Identification Xinglong Wang and Michael Mattews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Knowledge Sources for Word Sense Disambiguation of Biomedical Text Mark Stevenson, Yinkun Guo, Robert Gaizauskas and David Martinez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Automatic inference of indexing rules for MEDLINE Aurelie Neveol, Sonya Shooshan and Vincent Claveau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Prediction of Protein Sub-cellular Localization using Information from Texts and Sequences. Hong-Woo Chun, Chisato Yamasaki, Naomi Saichi, Masayuki Tanaka, Teruyoshi Hishiki, Tadashi Imanishi, Takashi Gojobori, Jin-Dong Kim, Jun’ichi Tsujii and Toshihisa Takagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 A Pilot Annotation to Investigate Discourse Connectivity in Biomedical Text Hong Yu, Nadya Frid, Susan McRoy, Rashmi Prasad, Alan Lee and Aravind Joshi . . . . . . . . . . . 92

vii

Conditional Random Fields and Support Vector Machines for Disorder Named Entity Recognition in Clinical Texts Dingcheng Li, Guergana Savova and Karin Kipper-Schuler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 Using Natural Language Processing to Classify Suicide Notes John Pestian, Pawel Matykiewicz, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan, Sarah Arszman Lavanier, Jennifer Combs and Robert Kowatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 Extracting Protein-Protein Interaction based on Discriminative Training of the Hidden Vector State Model Deyu Zhou and Yulan He . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 A preliminary approach to extract drugs by combining UMLS resources and USAN naming conventions Isabel Segura-Bedmar, Paloma Mart´ınez and Doaa Samy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Mapping Clinical Notes to Medical Terminologies at Point of Care Yefeng Wang and Jon Patrick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 An Approach to Reducing Annotation Costs for BioNLP Michael Bloodgood and K Vijay-Shanker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 Temporal Annotation of Clinical Text Danielle Mowery, Henk Harkema and Wendy Chapman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 CBR-Tagger: a case-based reasoning approach to the gene/protein mention problem Mariana Neves, Monica Chagoyen, Jos´e Mar´ıa Carazo and Alberto Pascual-Montano . . . . . . . 108 Textual Information for Predicting Functional Properties of the Genes Oana Frunza and Diana Inkpen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Determining causal and non-causal relationships in biomedical text by classifying verbs using a Naive Bayesian Classifier Pieter van der Horn, Bart Bakker, Gijs Geleijnse, Jan Korst and Sergei Kurkin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Statistical Term Profiling for Query Pattern Mining Paul Buitelaar, Pinar Oezden Wennerberg and Sonja Zillner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .114 Using Language Models to Identify Language Impairment in Spanish-English Bilingual Children Thamar Solorio and Yang Liu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Raising the Compatibility of Heterogeneous Annotations: A Case Study on Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre and Jun’ichi Tsujii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Adaptive Information Extraction for Complex Biomedical Tasks Donghui Feng, Gully Burns and Eduard Hovy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

viii

Workshop Program Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:45–8:50

Opening Remarks Session 1: Relations Extraction and Text Mining

8:50–9:15

A Graph Kernel for Protein-Protein Interaction Extraction Antti Airola, Sampo Pyysalo, Jari Bj¨orne, Tapio Pahikkala, Filip Ginter and Tapio Salakoski

9:15–9:40

Extracting Clinical Relationships from Patient Narratives Angus Roberts, Robert Gaizauskas and Mark Hepple

9:40–10:05

Using Automated Feature Optimisation to Create an Adaptable Relation Extraction System Barry Haddow

10:05–10:30

Mining the Biomedical Literature for Genic Information Catalina O Tudor, K Vijay-Shanker and Carl J Schmidt

10:30–11:00

Coffee break

11:00–11:40

Invited Talk by John Hutton, MD Session 2: Annotation Issues and Uncertainty Detection

11:45–12:10

Accelerating the Annotation of Sparse Named Entities by Dynamic Sentence Selection Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, Jun’ichi Tsujii and Sophia Ananiadou

12:10–12:35

The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts Gy¨orgy Szarvas, Veronika Vincze, Rich´ard Farkas and J´anos Csirik

12:35–13:00

Recognizing Speculative Language in Biomedical Research Articles: A Linguistically Motivated Perspective Halil Kilicoglu and Sabine Bergler

13:00–14:00

Lunch

ix

Thursday, June 19, 2008 (continued) Session 3: Named Entity Recognition 14:00–14:25

Cascaded Classifiers for Confidence-Based Chemical Named Entity Recognition Peter Corbett and Ann Copestake

14:25–14:50

How to Make the Most of NE Dictionaries in Statistical NER Yutaka Sasaki, Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, John McNaught and Sophia Ananiadou

14:50–15:30

Invited Talk by Hon Pak, MD

15:30–16:00

Coffee break Session 4: Word Sense Disambiguation

16:00–16:25

Species Disambiguation for Biomedical Term Identification Xinglong Wang and Michael Mattews

16:25–16:50

Knowledge Sources for Word Sense Disambiguation of Biomedical Text Mark Stevenson, Yinkun Guo, Robert Gaizauskas and David Martinez 17:00–18:00 Poster Session Automatic inference of indexing rules for MEDLINE Aurelie Neveol, Sonya Shooshan and Vincent Claveau Prediction of Protein Sub-cellular Localization using Information from Texts and Sequences. Hong-Woo Chun, Chisato Yamasaki, Naomi Saichi, Masayuki Tanaka, Teruyoshi Hishiki, Tadashi Imanishi, Takashi Gojobori, Jin-Dong Kim, Jun’ichi Tsujii and Toshihisa Takagi A Pilot Annotation to Investigate Discourse Connectivity in Biomedical Text Hong Yu, Nadya Frid, Susan McRoy, Rashmi Prasad, Alan Lee and Aravind Joshi Conditional Random Fields and Support Vector Machines for Disorder Named Entity Recognition in Clinical Texts Dingcheng Li, Guergana Savova and Karin Kipper-Schuler Using Natural Language Processing to Classify Suicide Notes John Pestian, Pawel Matykiewicz, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan, Sarah Arszman Lavanier, Jennifer Combs and Robert Kowatch

x

Thursday, June 19, 2008 (continued) Extracting Protein-Protein Interaction based on Discriminative Training of the Hidden Vector State Model Deyu Zhou and Yulan He A preliminary approach to extract drugs by combining UMLS resources and USAN naming conventions Isabel Segura-Bedmar, Paloma Mart´ınez and Doaa Samy Mapping Clinical Notes to Medical Terminologies at Point of Care Yefeng Wang and Jon Patrick An Approach to Reducing Annotation Costs for BioNLP Michael Bloodgood and K Vijay-Shanker Temporal Annotation of Clinical Text Danielle Mowery, Henk Harkema and Wendy Chapman CBR-Tagger: a case-based reasoning approach to the gene/protein mention problem Mariana Neves, Monica Chagoyen, Jos´e Mar´ıa Carazo and Alberto Pascual-Montano Textual Information for Predicting Functional Properties of the Genes Oana Frunza and Diana Inkpen Determining causal and non-causal relationships in biomedical text by classifying verbs using a Naive Bayesian Classifier Pieter van der Horn, Bart Bakker, Gijs Geleijnse, Jan Korst and Sergei Kurkin Statistical Term Profiling for Query Pattern Mining Paul Buitelaar, Pinar Oezden Wennerberg and Sonja Zillner Using Language Models to Identify Language Impairment in Spanish-English Bilingual Children Thamar Solorio and Yang Liu Raising the Compatibility of Heterogeneous Annotations: A Case Study on Yue Wang, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Jin-Dong Kim, Rune Saetre and Jun’ichi Tsujii Adaptive Information Extraction for Complex Biomedical Tasks Donghui Feng, Gully Burns and Eduard Hovy

xi

A Graph Kernel for Protein-Protein Interaction Extraction Antti Airola, Sampo Pyysalo, Jari Bj¨orne, Tapio Pahikkala, Filip Ginter and Tapio Salakoski Turku Centre for Computer Science and Department of IT, University of Turku Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 20520 Turku, Finland [email protected]

Abstract

evaluation resources, metrics and strategies make direct comparison of these numbers problematic. Further, the results gained from the BioCreative II evaluation, where the best performing system achieved a 29% F-score (Hunter et al., 2008), suggest that the problem of extracting binary protein protein interactions is far from solved.

In this paper, we propose a graph kernel based approach for the automated extraction of protein-protein interactions (PPI) from scientific literature. In contrast to earlier approaches to PPI extraction, the introduced alldependency-paths kernel has the capability to consider full, general dependency graphs. We evaluate the proposed method across five publicly available PPI corpora providing the most comprehensive evaluation done for a machine learning based PPI-extraction system. Our method is shown to achieve state-of-theart performance with respect to comparable evaluations, achieving 56.4 F-score and 84.8 AUC on the AImed corpus. Further, we identify several pitfalls that can make evaluations of PPI-extraction systems incomparable, or even invalid. These include incorrect crossvalidation strategies and problems related to comparing F-score results achieved on different evaluation resources.

1

Introduction

Automated protein-protein interaction (PPI) extraction from scientific literature is a task of significant interest in the BioNLP field. The most commonly addressed problem has been the extraction of binary interactions, where the system identifies which protein pairs in a sentence have a biologically relevant relationship between them. Proposed solutions include both hand-crafted rule-based systems and machine learning approaches (see e.g. (Bunescu et al., 2005)). A wide range of results have been reported for the systems, but as we will show, differences in

The public availability of large annotated PPIcorpora such as AImed (Bunescu et al., 2005), BioInfer (Pyysalo et al., 2007a) and GENIA (Kim et al., 2008), provides an opportunity for building PPI extraction systems automatically using machine learning. A major challenge is how to supply the learner with the contextual and syntactic information needed to distinguish between interactions and non-interactions. To address the ambiguity and variability of the natural language expressions used to state PPI, several recent studies have focused on the development, adaptation and application of NLP tools for the biomedical domain. Many high-quality domain-specific tools are now freely available, including full parsers such as that introduced by Charniak and Lease (2005). Additionally, a number of conversions from phrase structure parses to dependency structures that make the relationships between words more directly accessible have been introduced. These include conversions into representations such as the Stanford dependency scheme (de Marneffe et al., 2006) that are explicitly designed for information extraction purposes. However, specialized feature representations and kernels are required to make learning from such structures possible. Approaches such as subsequence kernels (Bunescu and Mooney, 2006), tree kernels (Zelenko

1 BioNLP 2008: Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 1–9, c Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 2008. 2008 Association for Computational Linguistics

prep_of> prep_of> conj_and>

interaction of P1 and

Further, we rigorously assess our method on five publicly available PPI corpora, providing the first broad cross-corpus evaluation with a machine learning approach to PPI extraction. Finally, we discuss the effects that different evaluation strategies, choice of corpus and applied metrics have on measured performance, and conclude.

P2