0013-7227/03/$15.00/0 Printed in U.S.A.
Endocrinology 144(9):3739 –3741 Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0781
Birds Return Every Spring Like Clockwork, but Where Is the Clock? One of the best known facts about natural history is surely that birds in the temperate zone tend to breed in the spring (1). Even a hardened urbanite notices the many changes associated with bird life that occur at this time, such as flocks of migrants passing overhead and marked increases in birdsong early in the morning. Despite the fact that these overt changes in activity are relatively well known, the underlying physiological systems that coordinate these changes remain unappreciated by many. Maintaining reproductive systems at full capacity is costly, especially to birds with their volant lifestyles. Therefore, these systems atrophy in seasonal breeders, often to a profound degree. To breed in the spring, birds must predict the vernal amelioration of the environment months in advance and gear up the reproductive neuroendocrine system so that they will be ready to fly to the right place, find and court a proper mate, obtain and perhaps construct a suitable nest site, lay eggs, and then incubate the eggs and care for the young. The paper by Yasuo et al. (2) in the current issue of Endocrinology provides us with new insights into the clock that is used to coordinate these complex hormonal changes. To understand completely the significance of these findings, we need to first review briefly what we do know about the neuroendocrine control of seasonal reproduction with a special emphasis on birds. How do birds (and other seasonally breeding species) carry out this remarkable feat of seasonal breeding? A series of stunning discoveries going back to the 1920s have taught us much about this process. It was Rowan (3) who first observed during studies of migratory behavior in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) that presenting birds with long day lengths could induce out-of-season migratory behavior. It subsequently became clear that seasonal variation in photoperiod is a key predictive cue used by birds to time both recrudescence and regression of the reproductive system at the appropriate times depending on the specifics of the natural history of the species in question (4, 5). Changes in photoperiod along with a host of supplementary cues that fine-tune reproductive recrudescence and regression, including factors such as variation in temperature and social interactions, provide the cues used by birds to time events properly for the maximization of reproductive success, even in the face of yearly variation in the progression of seasonal changes in the environment (6, 7). As the study of physiological mechanisms mediating seasonal reproduction and photoperiodism progressed, surprises were in store. Benoit (8) first observed in his study of photoperiodism in mallard ducks (Anas platyrhyncos) that the response to photoperiod involved sensory receptors in the brain itself rather than in the retina. It is now clear that an extraretinal photoreceptor present in the brain serves as the sensory detector for phoAbbreviation: SCN, Suprachiasmatic nucleus.
toperiod in birds (9). Thus, a blind bird’s reproductive system responds appropriately to photoperiod, whereas blocking light shining through the skull consigns the bird to constant darkness (10). Given that birds clearly detect and use changes in photoperiod, how do they measure it? One appealing idea is that a physiological hourglass of some sort is involved. Some investigators tried to find evidence for the accumulation of a substance that would track either night length or day length (e.g. Ref. 11). However, W. M. Hamner (12), borrowing from concepts applied to plants and insects by Bu¨nning (13) and K.C. Hamner (14), demonstrated in house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) that photoperiod is measured by the circadian system. One needs only two light pulses to stimulate a photoperiodic response, a dawn pulse and then a second pulse coincident with a particular phase of the circadian cycle (the photoinducible phase or i). A series of studies on both birds and mammals has demonstrated definitively that the photoperiodic time measurement system uses the circadian system to attain its goal (15, 16). Where then is the circadian clock that does this job? In the 1970s, a consensus developed in the field of vertebrate rhythms that one key site for the activity of the circadian clock is the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) (17). Simultaneous studies of photoperiodic mammals revealed that the pineal hormone melatonin codes for night length (plasma concentrations are high when it is dark and low when it is light). This code is used by seasonally breeding mammalian species such as hamsters and sheep to provide the circadian read-out needed for photoperiodic time measurement (18). A neural circuit was then identified starting with the retina projecting directly to the SCN that in turn projects to the paraventricular nucleus that then projects outside the brain to the superior cervical ganglion that ultimately projects to the pineal gland (19). Any interruption of this circuit blocked the rhythmic secretion of melatonin and, therefore, photoperiodic time measurement (19). However, in birds, this story did not seem to apply. Avian species do exhibit robust melatonin rhythms like mammals, but, curiously, they do not seem to use them for photoperiodic time measurement (20). Decades of experiments manipulating either the pineal or melatonin in a variety of avian species found no effect on the photoperiodic regulation of reproductive physiology (20). The putative site of the SCN in birds was also not obvious. Two candidate nuclei emerged, (21) and lesions to this general area did not provide clear proof for the interruption of photoperiodic time measurement (22). The recent explosion in our knowledge about the molecular basis of circadian clocks has provided chronobiologists with a new opportunity to study the location of cells that can function as oscillators and therefore act as biological clocks. Yasuo et al. (2) conducted investigations of the rhythmic
3739
3740
Endocrinology, September 2003, 144(9):3739 –3741
Ball and Balthazart • News & Views
FIG. 1. Diagrammatic representation of some of the major findings of the study by Yasuo et al. (2). Rhythmic clock gene expression was investigated in the SCN and the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) in Japanese quail exposed either to long or short photoperiods (left panels) or to interrupted night schedules (right panels). The pattern of gene expression for Per2 is illustrated here. In the SCN, the pattern of Per2 expression tracks changes in photoperiod, whereas in the MBH there is a constant circadian rhythm of expression independent of photoperiod. Photoperiods associated with testicular growth (illustrated in the lowest panels) result in an increased Per2 expression around zeitgeber time 16 in the SCN but not in the MBH. It was not known previously that the MBH is a site of circadian oscillation of clock gene expression. These data are consistent with the MBH serving as a clock important for photoperiodic time measurement.
activity of the five clock genes that have been subcloned in birds (Fig. 1). They studied clock gene expression in the brain and pineal gland of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using in situ hybridization histochemistry methods. The quail were maintained on either long [16 h light, 8 h dark (16L:8D)] or short [8 h light, 16 h dark (8L:16D)] days or were placed in a night interruption experiment. In the night interruption groups, the birds were maintained on very short days [4 h light, 20 h dark (4L:20D)] and were given 30-min light pulses at different intervals of time from the onset of dawn (7, 14, or 21 h). The birds experiencing the pulse at 14 h exhibit gonadal growth because the light pulse is coincident with the photoinducible phase of their circadian cycle. Clock gene rhythmicity was observed in the SCN and the pineal, although the pattern of gene expression did change with photoperiod. However, in the medial basal hypothalamus, especially in nuclei dorsolateral to the median eminence, strong rhythmicity was also observed that was constant in all photoperiodic conditions (Fig. 1). This observation alone might not be significant, but several lines of evidence had previously suggested that this brain area is important for photoperiodic time measurement. For example, lesions to this area were found to block photostimulation in quail even when it was clear that there was no interference with the adjacent fibers immunoreactive for GnRH that is essential for pituitary function (23). The immediate early gene fos is expressed in this region specifically in association with photostimulation (24). Taken together, these data suggest that this brain area is the long-sought clock essential for photoperiodic time measurement in birds. Also, there is evidence that this area is a site of the encephalic photoreceptor itself (25). Therefore, many of the major components of the system required for the control of avian photoperiodism are present in the medial basal hypothalamus. Lesion studies indicating that this area is important in controlling at least some traits regulated by photoperiod in hamsters such as gonadal
growth (26) suggest that it will be worth assessing carefully whether this region plays a general role among vertebrate species in the control of photoperiodic time measurement. Gregory F. Ball and Jacques Balthazart Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences (G.F.B.) Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21230 and University of Lie`ge (J.B.) Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology B-4020 Liege, Belgium Acknowledgments Received June 24, 2003. Accepted July 2, 2003. Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gregory F. Ball, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21230. Email:
[email protected]. This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 MH 50388 and National Science Foundation Grant IBN 9905401.
References 1. Murton R, Westwood N 1977 Avian breeding cycles. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press 2. Yasuo S, Watanabe M, Okabayashi N, Ebihara S, Yoshimura T 2003 Circadian clock genes and photoperiodism: comprehensive analysis of clock gene expression in the mediobasal hypothalamus, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, and the pineal gland of Japanese quail under various light schedules. Endocrinology 144:3742–3748 3. Rowan W 1925 Relation of light to bird migration and developmental changes. Nature 115:494 – 495 4. Farner DS, Follett BK 1979 Reproductive periodicity in birds. In: Barrington EJW, ed. Hormones and evolution. London and New York: Academic Press; 829 – 872 5. Dawson A, King VM, Bentley GE, Ball GF 2001 Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J Biol Rhythms 16:365–380 6. Ball GF 1993 The neural integration of enviromental information by seasonally breeding birds. Am Zool 33:185–199 7. Wingfield JC, Kenagy GJ 1991 Natural regulation of reproductive cycles. In: Pang PKT, Schreibman MP, eds. Vertebrate endocrinology: fundamentals and biomedical implications. San Diego: Academic Press; 181–241 8. Benoit J 1935 Stimulation par la lumiere artificiell du developpement testicu-
Ball and Balthazart • News & Views
9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.
laire chez des canards aveugles par enucleation des globes oculaires. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 120:136 –139 Oliver J, Bayle J 1982 Brain photoreceptors for the photo-induced testicular response in birds. Experientia 38:1021–1029 McMillan JP, Underwood HA, Elliot JA, Stetson MH, Menaker M 1975 Extra-retinal light perception. 4. Further evidence that eyes do not participate in photoperiodic photoreception. J Comp Physiol [A] 97:205–214 Farner DS 1959 Photoperiodic control of annual gonadal cycles in birds. In: Withrow R, ed. Photoperiodism and related phenomena in plants and animals. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 717–750 Hamner WM 1963 Diurnal rhythm and photoperiodism in testicular recrudescence of the house finch. Science 142:1294 –1295 Bu¨nning E 1960 Circadian rhythms and the time measurement in photoperiodism. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 25:249 –256 Hamner KC 1960 Photoperiodism and circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 25:254 –258 Elliot J, Stetson M, Menaker M 1972 Regulation of testis function in golden hamsters: a circadian clock measures photoperiodic time. Science 178:771–773 Follett BK 1984 Birds. In: Lamming GE, ed. Marshall’s physiology of reproduction. Edinburgh, Longman Greene; 283–350 Klein DC, Moore, RY, Reppert, SM, eds. 1991 Suprachiasmatic nucleus, the mind’s clock. New York: Oxford University Press Bittman EL, Karsch F 1984 Nightly duration of pineal melatonin secretion determines the reproductive response to inhibitory day length in the ewe. Biol Reprod 30:585–593
Endocrinology, September 2003, 144(9):3739 –3741 3741
19. Klein DC, Smoot R, Weller JL, Higa S, Markey SP, Creed GJ, Jacobowitz DM 1983 Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus area of the hypothalamus disrupt the suprachiasmatic spinal-cord circuit in the melatonin rhythm generatingsystem. Brain Res Bull 10:647– 652 20. Gwinner E, Hau M 2000 The pineal gland, circadian rhythms and photoperiodism. In: Whittow GC, ed. Sturkies avian physiology. 5th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 557–568 21. Norgren Jr RB, Silver R 1989 Retinohypothalamic projections and the suprachiasmatic nucleus in birds. Brain Behav Evol 34:73– 83 22. Davies DT, Follett BK 1975 The neuroendocrine control of gonadotrophin release in the Japanese quail. II. The role of the anterior hypothalamus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 191:303–315 23. Juss TS 1993 Neuroendocrine and neural changes associated with the photoperiodic control of reproduction. In: Sharp PJ, ed. Avian endocrinology. Bristol, UK: Journal of Endocrinology Ltd.; 47–59 24. Meddle SL, Follett BK 1997 Photoperiodically driven changes in Fos expression within the basal tuberal hypothalamus and median eminence of Japanese quail. J Neurosci 17:8909 – 8918 25. Saldanha CJ, Leak RK, Silver R 1994 Detection and transduction of daylength in birds. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19:641– 656 26. Maywood ES, Hastings MH 1995 Lesions of the iodomelatonin-binding sites of the mediobasal hypothalamus spare the lactotropic, but block the gonadotropic response of male Syrian hamsters to short photoperiod and to melatonin. Endocrinology 136:144 –153
