Original Article
Eurasian J Med 2015
Characteristics of Patients Who Admitted to the Emergency Department Because of Burns Due to Dens Liquids Such as Hot Milk/Oil Acil Servise Sıcak Süt/Yağ Gibi Yoğun Sıvılara Bağlı Yanık Sebebi ile Başvuran Hastaların Özellikleri Atıf Bayramoglu1, M. Talip Şener2, Zeynep Çakir1, Şahin Aslan1, Mücahit Emet1, Ayhan Akoz1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey Department of Forensic Medicine, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
1 2
Abstract
Özet
Objective: Burn is the tissue damage on body caused due to various reasons. Although all burns caused by hot liquids are investigated as scalding burns, dense liquid burns (DLB) caused by such as milk and oil are different from other burns. The aim of this study was to report the properties of DLB.
Amaç: Yanık sıklıkla sıcak suya bağlı (haşlanma) oluşan hayatı tehdit eden bir durumdur. Bununla birlikte, bizim deneyimlerimize göre, sıcak süt ve yağ gibi yoğun sıvılara bağlı yanıklar, klinik seyir ve taburculuk açısından farklılıkları sebebi ile ayrı değerlendirilmelidir. Burada yoğun sıvılara bağlı yanıkların özelliklerini sunduk.
Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to the Emergency Service of Atatürk University Hospital, with DLB from June 2003 to December 2008, were examined retrospectively.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Acil servisimize 2003 ile 2008 yılları arasında yoğun sıvılara bağlı yanık sebebi ile başvuran hastaları retrospektif olarak inceledik.
Results: During the study, 28 DLB patients were admitted to the emergency service. The most common admission were found in autumn 28.6% (n=8), and in May and June, 17.9% (n=5). The frequency of burns on the right upper extremity was seen in 50% (n=14) of the patients. The burn degree of all patients was determined as 2nd degree. Seventy-five percent (n=21) of the patients were discharged, 14.3% (n=4) were hospitalized. None of the patients died.
Bulgular: Toplam olarak, 28 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Ortalama yaş 26,5 idi ve hastaların %75’i kadındı. Hastaların %89,3’ü acil servisimize direk başvurdu ve %10,7’si başka acil servislerden hastanemize sevk edilmiş idi. Hastaların %75’i acil servisteki tedavilerinin ardından taburcu edildi, %14,3’ü yanık merkezine yatırıldı, %7,1’i başka hastaneye sevk edildi ve %3,6’sı yatışı reddetti. Yanık merkezindeki ortalama yatış süresi 24,5 gündü. Ortalama yanık alanı %3 idi. Vücut bölümlerine göre yanık sıklığı yüzdeleri: Baş ve boyun %39,3, gövde ön yüzü %14,3, gövde arka yüzü %17,9, sağ üst ekstremite %50, sol üst ekstremite %35,7, sağ alt ekstremite %21,4, sol alt ekstremite %89,3. Yanıkların tümü 2. dereceydi.
Conclusion: Dense liquid burns is a burn type that is commonly seen in women, absolutely causing 2nd degree burns, frequently reported in upper extremity and head/neck regions, and in contrast to other studies, in our region it is completely seen in patients living in city centre. Keywords: Dens liquid, burn, milk, oil
Introduction Burn is tissue damage to the body that is caused by heat, electric shock, light, chemical substances and the effects of radiation. Although burns can easily be avoided, treatment is difficult and expensive, and, despite improvements in medicine, a burn may be fatal. The primary factors that affect the prognosis of a patient are age, extent of burned area, and the
Sonuç: Sıcak süt ve yağa bağlı yoğun sıvı yanıkları sıklıkla kadınlarda görülür. Yanıkların tamamı 2. derecedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Yanık, haşlanma, yoğun sıvılara bağlı yanık
presence of inhalation injuries [1]. In the evaluations of the causes of burns, those that are most frequently reported are scalding and flame [2]. Scalding burns are primarily caused by hot water, followed by hot milk, oil, and other hot liquids. All burns caused by hot liquids are investigated under the sub-heading of scalding burns. However, dense liquid burns (DLB), caused by liquids such as milk and oil, generally have a different clinical picture and result, compared to less dense
Received: February 21, 2015 / Accepted: March 24, 2015 Correspondence to: Atıf Bayramoğlu, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey Phone: +90 442 231 84 07 e-mail:
[email protected] ©Copyright 2015 by the Atatürk University School of Medicine - Available online at www.eurasianjmed.com DOI:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2015.34
Bayramoglu et al. Dens liquid’s burn
liquids burns (LDLB), such as those caused by hot water, although they are evaluated as parts of the same group. This study aimed to report the properties of DLB.
Eurasian J Med
Seasons 30
Materials and Methods Percent
20
28.57
0
25
21.43
10
Winter
Autumn Summer Seasons
Months
15
10
17.86
17.86
14.29
14.29
5 7.143
December
November
October
Months
3.571 3.571
September
3.571
August
June
May
April
March
February
0
3.571
July
3.571 3.571
January
During the study, 28 individuals with DLB had been admitted to the emergency service, 75% (n=21) of whom were female, and the median age was 26.5 years (min=20, max=53). There were no additional problems, for example, trauma, electric shock, or carbon monoxide poisoning, in any of the cases. Totally 89.3% (n=25) of the patients had been initially admitted to our emergency service. All patients were from Erzurum; 96.4% (n=27) were living in the city centre, while 3.6% (n=1) came from rural areas. When we examined the admission to the emergency service according to the seasons; 28.6% (n=8) of admissions occurred in autumn, 25% (n=7) in summer, 25% (n=7) in spring and 21.4% (n=6) of patients were admitted in winter (Figure 1). When we arranged the admissions in order, according to the months, 17.9% (n=5) occurred in May and June, 14.3% (n=4) occurred in January and October, and at least 3.6% (n=1) of patients were admitted in February, March, July, August, November, and December, respectively (Figure 2). In an investigation of the circumstances of the burn occurrence; 60.7% (n=17) of the cases had been caused by
Spring
20
7.143
Results
25
Figure 1. Seasonal distribution of burns.
Percent
We retrospectively examined the patients admitted to the Atatürk University, Faculty of Medicine Hospital Emergency Service, Turkey, between June 2003 and December 2008. We included only those patients with isolated DLB; we excluded cases of electric shock, water vapour burn and carbon monoxide poisoning. Age, gender, the month of admission to the emergency service, anatomy of the burned areas, circumstances in which the burn occurred, the total burn surface area and outcomes had previously been recorded. In calculating the degree of burns, we regarded the highest degree of burn present as the criterion (e.g., if there were burn injuries of both 1 and 2 degrees, the burn degree was accepted as a rating of 2). We categorized the localizations of burns as head-neck, the body, the body front or back, the right upper extremity, the left upper extremity, the right lower extremity, the left lower extremity, and the genital region. The outcomes had been recorded as discharged, hospitalized, transferred to another centre, or death. Demographic, clinical, and socio-cultural features had been recorded by an emergency service doctor, and particular features of patients had been saved on the “SPSS.18 for Windows” program. Numeric variables were given together with their median (min-max) values.
Figure 2. Monthly distributions of burns.
hot milk, while 39.3% (n=11) had been caused by hot oil (Figure 3). The frequency of burns according to bodily regions involved were as follows: 50% (n=14) of patients had right upper extremity burns, the left upper extremity was burned in 35.7% (n=10) of the patients, the head-neck area in 39.3% (n=11), the right lower extremity in 21.4% (n=6), the left lower extremity in 10.7% (n=3), the front of the body in 14.3% (n=4), and the back of the body in 17.9% (n=5) of the patients, while the genital region was not burned in any of the patients (Figure 4). The mean burn ratio of the cases was 28% +/- 3.45%. The burn degree of all patients was determined as second degree. Totally 75% (n=21) of the patients had been discharged from our emergency service after their first treatment, 14.3% (n=4) had been hospitalized in the burn centre, 7.1%, (n=2)
Bayramoglu et al. Dens liquid’s burn
Eurasian J Med
Type of occurence Hot oil Hot milk
17.9%
14.3%
39.29
RIGHT
LEFT
50%
35.7% 0%
60.71
21.4%
10.7%
39.3%
Figure 5. Distribution of burns according to involved body region. Figure 3. Distribution of burns according to the type of occurrence. Outcome 3.571 7.143
discharge hospitalization Transerred Decline hospitalization
14.29
75
Figure 4. Outcome of burns.
had been transferred to another centre, since there were no available rooms in our hospital, 3.6% (n=1) had declined hospitalization, 7.1% (n=2) had left the burn centre before their treatment had been finished, at the request of themselves or their relatives, and 7.1% (n=2) had been discharged from the burn centre after their treatment (Figure 5). None of the DBL patients died during their treatment in the emergency service or burn centre. The median number of hospitalization days was 24, and this varied between 3 and 37 days.
Discussion Scalding is the most frequent cause of burns [3-5]. Burns from hot liquids may be LDLB, such as water burns, or DLB,
such as hot oil, hot milk, tar or wax burns. Hot milk creates a similar effect with oil, due to the oils it includes. Tar is a liquid oily material that does not dissolve in water, and is used for road construction [6]. Wax tree resin is a substance with high viscosity, constituting vegetable oils and powder, which is used for epilation [7]. As compared to less dense liquids, such as water, dense liquids are more capable of retaining heat and, due to their viscosity; they adhere to the skin more firmly. Therefore, with the same volume of exposure, DLB are deeper than LDLB. The viscosity of oil is reduced when heated, but it is still 20 times greater than that of water [8, 9]. Therefore, when assessing hot liquid burns as scalding, many investigators evaluate hot oil or hot-milk burns in a separate category [10, 11]. In general, the male/female ratio has been reported as 2:1 for burns [12-14]. In a study on hot-milk burns, Tarim et al. [5] reported that 52.9% of the patients were female [15]. Uzkeser et al. [15] determined that 97.7% of the patients with tandoor burns were female, and they concluded that this was because of the fact that women use tandoors to prepare bread [16]. In this study, DLB were also more common in women than men with a ratio that was three times higher (75%, to 25%). This may be due to the fact that women boil milk in large kettles to prepare cheese, and use very hot oil at home in food preparation. In their study of 75 cases over 4 years, Sarıtaş et al. [16] reported that the mean age of patients was 20.0±20.7 years, the mean burn percentage was 8.1%±8.9%, and the burn degree was second degree in 65.3% of the cases and third degree in 22.7% of the cases [17]. In a study of 43 cases of tandoor burns, Uzkeser et al. [15] found that the median age of the individuals involved was 45 years (min:20, max:75), and the mean burn percentage was 18%. Burns were reported as second-degree in 23.3% of patients and as third-degree in 76.7% of patients [16]. In our study, the median patient age was 26.5 years (min=20, max=53), the mean burn percentage
Bayramoglu et al. Dens liquid’s burn
was 28%±3.45, and the burn degree of all patients was seconddegree. Although some studies have reported that burns are most commonly observed to the upper extremities and head/neck areas [16, 17], others have indicated that they are most frequently seen in the upper and lower extremities, especially the hands [18, 19]. In our study, we most frequently found burns in the right upper extremity (50%), left upper extremity (35.7%), and head and neck region (39.3%), respectively. Burns to the head-neck and arms are generally caused by pulling down hot fluid, due to accidentally upsetting a kettle that is full of hot milk or oil. Moreover, while slipping down of the stew pot filled with hot fluid while taking it from fire, fluid may be dispersed as a result of reflex, and burns on the head, neck and upper extremities may take place by this way. The reason for more burns to the right arm than the left arm is that the right hand is that which is dominant in the general population. In their study, Tarim et al. [5] determined a mortality rate of 15.7% in 140 children, 75.6% of whom were living in rural areas. Türegün reported that, of 15 children involved in their study, 14 were living in rural areas and, while the remaining child was living in a city, the burn to that patient occurred during a visit to a rural region. They reported a mortality ratio of 20% [5]. Interestingly, in the present study, all the patients had been living in the city centre. The results we found may be due to the fact that, in our region, the habits observed by people living in rural areas continue in the city centre. Moreover, in neighbouring rural areas, burns may be treated in their primary or secondary care centres. We observed no mortality in our study, which might be connected to the fact that active treatments were begun earlier, since the patients came from the city centre. The primary limitation of our study was the low number of patients assessed. A second limitation was that, due to the retrospective study design, complete patient data were not available; therefore, we could not conduct cost estimation of DBL. In our opinion, further similar studies, carried out in a large number of patients, are necessary. In conclusion, DLB, a burn type that is commonly observed in women, causing second-degree burns, is frequently reported in the upper extremities and head/neck regions, and, in contrast to previous studies, we observed DLB in patients living only in the city centre in our region. Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval was obtained. Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from patient/patients who participated in this study. Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed. Author Contributions: Concept - A.B., Ş.A.; Design - A.B.; Supervision - A.B.; Funding - M.T.Ş.; Materials - A.B., M.E.; Data Collection and/or Processing - M.E.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - M.T.Ş.; Literature Review - A.A.; Writer - A.B.; Critical Review - Z.Ç.
Eurasian J Med
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflict of interest. Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
References 1.
Sheppard NN, Hemington-Gorse S, Shelley OP, Philp B, Dziewulski P. Prognostic scoring systems in burns: A review. Burns 2011; 37: 128895. [CrossRef] 2. Laitakari E, Pyorala S, Koljonen V. Burn injuries requiring hospitalization for infants younger than 1 year. J Burn Care Research 2012; 33: 436-41. [CrossRef] 3. Pande KC, Ishak HL. Epidemiology of burns in a major referral hospital in Brunei Darussalam. Singapore Med J 2012; 53: 124-7. 4. Sakallioglu AE, Basaran O, Tarim A, Turk E, Kut A, Haberal M. Burns in Turkish children and adolescents: Nine years of experience. Burns 2007; 33: 46-51. [CrossRef] 5. Tarim A, Nursal TZ, Basaran O, Yildirim S, Turk E, Moray G, Haberal M. Scalding in Turkish children: comparison of burns caused by hot water and hot milk. Burns 2006; 32: 473-6. [CrossRef] 6. Ersel M, Aksay E, Özsaraç M, Yüksel B. Use of olive for cleaning of hot tar burn. Turk J Emerg Med 2009; 9: 174-6. 7. Dağar S, Akın S. Sıcak sir ağda ile olusan yanıkta agdanın temizlenmesinde zeytinyağı kullanimi. Turk J Emerg Med 2010; 10: 49-50. 8. Murphy, JT, Purdue GF, Hunt JL. Pediatric grease burn injury. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 478-82. [CrossRef] 9. Schubert W, Ahrenholz DH, Solem LD. Burns from hot oil and grease: a public health hazard. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990; 11: 558-62. [CrossRef] 10. Drago DA. Kitchen scalds and thermal burns in children five years and younger. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 10-6. 11. Lin TM, Wang KH, Lai CS, Lin SD.Epidemiology of pediatric burn in southern Taiwan. Burns 2005; 31: 182-7. [CrossRef] 12. Cheng W, Yan-hua R, Fang-gang N, Wei-li D, Guo-an Z. Epidemiology of 1974 burn patients at a major burn center in Beijing: a nine-year study. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33: e228-33. [CrossRef] 13. Lipovy B, Fiamoli M, Gregorova N, Rihova H, Jarkovsky J, Cvanova M, Suchanek I, Brychta P. Epidemiology of Critical Burns in Southern Moravia. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca 2012; 79: 370-5. 14. Duke J, Wood F, Semmens J, Edgar DW, Spilsbury K, Rea S. An assessment of burn injury hospitalisations of adolescents and young adults in Western Australia, 1983-2008. Burns 2012; 38: 128-35. [CrossRef] 15. Uzkeser M, Özoğul B, Sarıtemur M, Aköz A, Bayramoğlu A. Characteristics of Tandır Burns Presenting to the Emergency Department. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2013; 33: 711-5. [CrossRef] 16. Sarıtaş A, Çıkman M, Çandar M, Kandiş H, Baltacı D. Retrospective analysis of judicial burn cases admitted to our clinic: 4-year experience. Duzce Med J 2011; 13: 29-33. 17. Guzel A, Aksu, Aylac H, Duran R, Karasalihoglu S. Scalds in Pediatric Emergency Department: A 5-Year Experience. J Burn Care Research 2009; 30: 450-6. [CrossRef] 18. İlhan E, Dal O, Yakan S, Cengiz F. Evaluation of the burn patients presenting to emergency clinic of a education hospital. J Clinical and Analitical Medicine 2012; 2012: 268-70. 19. Turegun M, Celikoz B, Nisanci M, Selmanpakoglu N. An extraordinary cause of scalding injury in childhood. Burns 1997; 23: 170. [CrossRef]
