Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2011) 42: 158-171 ISSN 1517-8382
CHARACTERIZATION OF LACTOBACILLUS FROM ALGERIAN GOAT’S MILK BASED ON PHENOTYPIC, 16S rDNA SEQUENCING AND THEIR TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES Ahmed Marroki1 *; Manuel Zúñiga2; Mabrouk Kihal3; Gaspar Pérez- Martínez2 1
Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Department of Biotechnology (IGMO), University of Oran Es-Sénia, Oran, 31100 ,
Algeria; 2Department of Biotechnology, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de los Alimentos (C.S.I.C), polígono de la Coma s/n, Burjassot (Valencia), Spain; 3Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Oran Es-Sénia, Oran, Algeria. Submitted: February 18, 2010; Returned to authors for corrections: February 24, 2010; Approved: August 01, 2010.
ABSTRACT Nineteen strains of Lactobacillus isolated from goat’s milk from farms in north-west of Algeria were characterized. Isolates were identified by phenotypic, physiological and genotypic methods and some of their important technological properties were studied. Phenotypic characterization was carried out by studying physiological, morphological characteristics and carbohydrate fermentation patterns using API 50 CHL system. Isolates were also characterized by partial 16S rDNA sequencing. Results obtained with phenotypic methods were correlated with the genotypic characterization and 13 isolates were identified as L. plantarum, two isolates as L. rhamnosus and one isolate as L. fermentum. Three isolates identified as L. plantarum by phenotypic characterization were found to be L. pentosus by the genotypic method. A large diversity in technological properties (acid production in skim milk, exopolysaccharide production, aminopeptidase activity, antibacterial activity and antibiotic susceptibility) was observed. Based on these results, two strains of L. plantarum (LbMS16 and LbMS21) and one strain of L. rhamnosus (LbMF25) have been tentatively selected for use as starter cultures in the manufacture of artisanal fermented dairy products in Algeria. Key words: Lactic acid bacteria; Lactobacillus; identification; goat’s milk; technological properties; Algeria.
INTRODUCTION
the considerable variations in biochemical attributes between strains currently considered to belong to the same species. In
The identification of lactobacilli has been based mainly on
fact, some species are not readily distinguishable in terms of
fermentation of carbohydrates, morphology, and Gram staining
phenotypic characteristics (12). In recent years, the taxonomy
and these methods are still being used. However, the
has changed considerably with the increasing knowledge of the
characterization of some Lactobacillus to species level by
genomic structure and phylogenetic relationships between
biochemical methods alone is not reliable (27, 40), because of
Lactobacillus spp. (27, 43, 47). This novel taxonomy based on
*Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Department of Biotechnology (IGMO), University of Oran Es-Sénia, Oran, 31100, Algeria.; Tel: +213 772 142 345 Fax: + 213 41 58 19 41.; E-mail address:
[email protected]
158
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
MATERIAL AND METHODS
DNA analysis offers a variety of advantages over other more conventional typing procedures, such as the stability of the genomic DNA analysis, the capacity to discriminate bacteria at
Milk samples
the strain level, and the amenability to automation and
Five samples of goat’s milk collected from farms located
statistical analysis (21). These methods have been employed
in the region north-west of Algeria were used in this study. The
for differentiation or identification and typing of different
samples were collected aseptically in sterile bottles kept in an
species of Lactobacillus. The species of lactobacilli most
ice-box, and transported immediately to the laboratory.
commonly found in milk, and dairy product, especially in goat’s milk are L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, L. casei or L.
Phenotypic characterization
paracasei. For this reason, the selection of Lactobacillus
One milliliter of each milk sample was homogenized with
strains from goat’s milk has been considered in the search for
9 ml of sterile Ringer’s solution 1:4 and mixed thoroughly for
new industrially important cultures, in order to select those
60s. Serial dilutions were made and aliquots (100 µl) of each
with the highest potential for industrial applications. In Algeria,
dilution were streaked on MRS agar (Oxoid, UK) (17). The
goat’s milk plays a vital role in human consumption, most
MRS plates were incubated at 30 °C and 45°C for 24 to 48h
being consumed by the rural community, while little is
under anaerobic conditions (Anaerogen, Oxoid). Ten colonies
available on the market (5). Algerian people make various
from plates corresponding to the highest dilutions were
fermented dairy products using goat’s milk. The transformation
randomly selected and purified by subculturing. Gram-positive,
of goat’s milk into traditional Algerian dairy products, such as
catalase negative cultures were stored at -80 °C in MRS
El – Klila, a traditional cheese which is popular in the country
supplemented with 20% glycerol. Isolates were phenotypically
side and is made from unpasteurised cow or goat surplus milk
assigned to the genus level on the basis of: cell morphology,
(7), Jben (local traditional fresh cheese), Raïb, and Lben (local
Gram-positive and catalase-negative, according to the methods
traditional fermented milks), is achieved through spontaneous
and criteria described by Sharpe (42) and Kandler and Weiss
fermentation without the addition of any selected starter. Such
(26); CO2 production from glucose in MRS broth containing
products generally present irregular sensorial qualities. The aim
inverted Durham tubes (32); hydrolysis of arginine, growth at
of the present study was to characterize Lactobacillus isolated
15 °C and 45 °C, tolerance to 20, 40, 65 g L-1 NaCl. The acid
from goat’s milk from north-west of Algeria, using
production from carbohydrates (fructose, glucose, mannitol,
physiological, phenotypic and genotypic methods. There are no
lactose, mannose, rhamnose, glycerol, arabinose, sorbose,
previous reports concerning the genetic identification of
dulcitol, amygdalin, melibiose, melezitose, starch, tagatose,
Lactobacillus or studies that combined the phenotypic and the
arabitol, ribose, maltose, galactose, and xylose) was evaluated
genotypic identification of Lactobacillus isolated from goat’s
by using a miniaturized assay in microtiter plates, as described
milk in Algeria. Additionally, in order to select adequate
by Jayne-Williams (25). Ability to ferment carbohydrate
strains susceptible to be used as starter cultures for the
substrates was studied, using the API 50 CHL system
manufacture of artisanal fermented dairy products in Algeria,
(BioMérieux, Lyon, France), following the manufacturer
some important technological properties, including the capacity
recommendations.
of acidification/coagulation of skim milk, exopolysaccharide production,
aminopeptidase,
antibacterial
antibiotics resistance, were also studied.
activity,
and
DNA extraction and 16S rDNA sequencing Isolates were grown in MRS broth at 30 °C until OD of
159
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
1.6 - 1.8 at 600 nm. A 1.5 mL aliquot of each overnight culture
pH changes were measured with a pH meter (glass electrode,
was centrifuged at 10000 × g for 30 s at room temperature in
Crison, Spain) after 6, 12, and 24 h of incubation at 30°C.
order to pellet cells. Bacterial DNA was isolated by using the
Acidification activity was measured by following the change in
TM
(MoBio
the pH during time. Coagulation of milk was determined after
Laboratories Inc., Solana Beach, CA, USA), following the
24 h of incubation at 30°C. Screening of exopolysaccharide
instructions of the manufacturer.
(EPS) was carried out in ruthenium red milk plates, as
UltraClean
Microbial
DNA
isolation
Kit
The 5′ end variable region of the 16S rDNA was PCR-
described by Stingele et al. (44).
amplified with primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTC
Aminopeptidase activity of the strains was determined
AG-3′) and 558R (5′-GTATTCCGCGGCTG-3) or with the
using the synthetic substrates L-alanine ρ-nitroaniline (Ala-ρ-
primers 27F and 1525R (5′-AAGGAGGTGWTCCARCCG
NA) (Sigma,USA), and L-leucine ρ-nitroaniline (Leu-ρ-NA)
CA-3′) using a total volume of 50 µl containing 50 ng of DNA,
(Sigma,USA) as described by Zotta et al. (51). Stationary
25 pmol of each primer, 1.6 mM of dNTPs, 2 mM MgCl2 and
phase cells grown overnight in MRS broth were harvested by
1U of Taq DNA polymerase (Biotools Lab, Spain), using the
centrifugation at 10000 × g for 5 min, washed twice with sterile
reaction buffer supplied by the manufacturer.
50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and re-suspended
Amplifications were carried out in a Thermal Cycler
in the same buffer to obtain cell suspensions of (A
650
= 1.0).
(PTC-100 Peltier Themal Cycler, MJR), using the following
Aminopeptidase activity was measured, according to Macedo
program: for primers 27F and 558R, the 16S rDNA was
et al.(31). The assay mixture contained: 30µl of 20 mM
amplified as described by Linaje et al. (30); for the primers 27F
aminoacyl ρ-nitroanilide substrates dissolved in methanol, 195
and 1525R, the PCR mixtures were subjected to an initial
µL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 95 µL of
denaturing step of 95 °C for 5min, followed by 30 PCR cycles
0.05% (w/v) sodium azide solution, and 75 µL of cell
(94 °C, 15s; 52 °C, 30s; 72 °C, 2min) and final cycle at 72 °C
suspension. After incubation at 30 °C for 1 to 4 h, the reaction
for 5min. The PCR products were subjected to gel
was stopped by the addition of 900 µL of 1% (v/v) acetic acid.
electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, followed by staining with
The release of ρ-nitroaniline (ρ-NA) (Sigma, USA) was
ethidium bromide and visualization under UV light. A Lambda
measured spectrophotometrically (Hewlett Packaro, Diod
DNA (Biorad) digested with PstI ladder was used as a
Array Spectrophotometer,
molecular mass marker.
centrifugation of the mixture at 10000 × g for 5min. Data
Germany) at 410 nm after
Polymerase chain reaction products were purified by using
obtained were compared to a calibration curve prepared using
the GFX PCR DNA and a gel band purification Kit (General
ρ-NA (Sigma, USA) dilutions ranging from 0.1 to 20.0 mM.
Electric Healthcare, Spain), following the manufacturer’s
One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of
instructions. DNA sequencing was carried out by the Central
enzyme required to release 1 µmol of ρ-NA min-1 under the
Service of Research Support of the University of Valencia
assay conditions.
(Spain),
by
using
the
dideoxynucleotide
DNA
chain
termination method.
Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus strains was tested with the well diffusion method described by Linaje et al. (30). Cells were grown overnight in MRS broth. Cell-free
Technological properties Acidifying activity in skim milk was assayed as described
supernatants were obtained by centrifugation at 10000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, adjusted to pH 6.5 with 1N NaOH, and then
by Psono et al. (35). Sterile skim milk samples (100 mL; 1.0%)
filtered
were inoculated with overnight cultures which had been
(Millipore). The supernatants were adjusted to pH 6.5, in order
previously activated by two successive transfers in milk. The
to eliminate the eventual antimicrobial activity linked to
through
0.22µm
Durapore
membrane
filters
160
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
organic acids. A 100 µL aliquot of an overnight culture of the indicator bacteria Listeria monocytogenes CECT 932T, Bacillus cereus INRA AVZ 421, Staphylococcus aureus CECT 86T and Staphylococcus aureus UT 602, was mixed with 5 mL of soft
Phenotypic identification of isolates Isolated
strains
were
identified
based
on
their
agar (Trypticase Soya Broth for Bacillus cereus and
physiological and biochemical characteristics given by Kandler
Staphylococcus aureus and Brain Heart Infusion for Listeria
and Weiss (26), Dellaglio et al. (15) and Stiles and Holzapfel
monocytogenes, supplemented with 0.8% agar). Aliquots (50
(43), to the species level, and also by using API 50 CHL test
µl) of supernatant of overnight cultures were poured in the
strips (BioMérieux, Lyon, France) for confirmation of species
wells digged in the soft agar. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C,
of selected strains.
inhibition zones were read. A clear zone of inhibition >1 mm
All isolates (19 Lactobacillus strains) were rod shaped
around a well was scored as positive. In order to check the
cells, Gram-positive, catalase-negative, non motile and
thermoresistance of the bacteriocins, cell free supernatant
facultative anaerobic bacteria. Isolates were classified as
samples were heated at 100°C for 10 min, prior the
belonging to the genus Lactobacillus. All isolates were able to
antibacterial assay. The proteinaceous nature of the inhibitory
grow at 15°C, 2%, and 4% NaCl. They were divided into two
activity was tested by the addition of 0.5 µg of proteinase K
preliminary groups (I and II), according to the results for CO2
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to the concentrated culture
production from glucose, and NH3 production from arginine:
supernatants (50 µL) distributed among the wells of the assay
Group I, facultatively heterofermentative, and arginine-
plates.
negative
lactobacilli
heterofermentative, Antibiotic susceptibility testing
and
(94.73%);
group
arginine-positive
II strain
strictly (one
Lactobacillus strain).
Susceptibility testing was based on the agar overlay disc
Table 1 shows the carbohydrate utilization patterns and
diffusion test described by Charteris et al. (10), as modified by
other physiological and biochemical characteristics of the
Aymerich et al. (4). Briefly, Lactobacillus strains were grown
lactobacilli isolates. The analysis of data compared with those
overnight in MRS broth at 30°C under anaerobic conditions
of the criteria given by several authors, resulted in four
(Anaerogen, Oxoid). Eight ml of MRS soft agar kept at 50°C
subgroups (A-D). Group I was subdivided into three subgroups
were inoculated with 200 µL of the grown culture. Petri dishes
(A-C) and group II, comprised only one subgroup (D). Isolates
containing 15 mL of MRS were overlaid with 8.2 mL of the
belonging to the four subgroups were able to ferment fructose,
inoculated MRS and allowed to solidify at room temperature.
glucose, mannitol, lactose, mannose, ribose, maltose, and
Antibiotic discs were placed onto the overlaid plates and all
galactose and unable to ferment xylose.
plates were incubated at 30°C for 24 h under anaerobic
•
Subgroup A was the largest one, with 11 strains (58%)
conditions. All isolates were screened for their susceptibility to
identified as L. plantarum. The strains were able to ferment
penicillin G (10 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), vancomycin (30 µg),
amygdalin, melibiose, melezitose, and arabitol, but unable to
tetracycline (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), kanamycin (30µg)
ferment rhamnose, glycerol, sorbose, dulcitol, and tagatose.
gentamicin (10 µg), and chloramphenicol (30 µg). Inhibition
However, variations in fermentation patterns were observed for
zones diameters of antibiotics were compared to those defined
some sugars: arabinose was fermented by 36%, starch by 18%,
by Charteris et al. (10) for lactobacilli.
sorbose by 9%, and dulcitol by 9% of the strains. Most of the
161
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
lactobacilli reported as being able to produce amylase are
(40%) to ferment glycerol resulted in their classification either
strictly homofermentative (26), although some L. plantarum
as L. plantarum or as L. pentosus (8, 50). Growth at 45°C was
have been reported as starch fermenting strains (33). Eighteen
observed for 40% of isolates.
percent of isolates from this subgroup were able to grow at
•
Subgroup C, included two isolates able to ferment
45°C. Some of the L. plantarum strains were capable of
rhamnose, arabinose, amygdalin, and melezitose. However,
growing at 45°C, in contrast to the characteristics given in
glycerol, sorbose, dulcitol, melibiose, starch, tagatose, and
Bergey’s Manual (26). Other studies have also reported the
arabitol were not fermented. All the isolates were able to grow
isolation of L. plantarum strains capable of growing at this
at 45°C and identified as L. rhamnosus.
temperature (20, 39). •
•
Subgroup D, with one isolate able to ferment
Subgroup B, comprised 5 strains (26%) identified as
rhamnose, arabinose amygdalin, melibiose and tagatose. In
belonging to L .plantarum/L. pentosus species. The isolates
contrast, this strain was incapable of fermenting glycerol,
only differed from those of subgroup A in the inability to
sorbose, dulcitol, melezitose, starch and arabitol. This isolate
ferment the starch and arabitol. The ability of some strains
was able to grow at 45°C and was classified as L. fermentum.
Table 1. Biochemical and physiological characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Algerian goat’s milk. Group Subgroup Number of isolates CO2 from glucose Arginine Hydrolysis Growth at 15°C 45°C Growth in 2 % NaCl 4 % NaCl 6.5 % NaCl Sugar fermentation Fructose Glucose Mannitol Lactose Mannose Rhamnose Glycerol Arabinose Sorbose Dulcitol amygdalin Melibiose Melezitose Starch Tagatose Arabitol Ribose Maltose Galactose Xylose
A 11 -
I B 5 -
C 2 -
II D 1 + +
+ 18
+ 40
+ +
+ +
+ + -
+ + -
+ + -
+ + -
+ + + + + 36 9 9 + + + 18 + + + + -
+ + + + + 40 + 20 20 + + + + + -
+ + + + + + + + + + + + -
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + -
+: Positive reaction; -: Negative reaction; 20: 20% of isolates showed a positive result; Subgroup A: LbMA9, LbMF13, LbMF33, LbMS4, LbMS9, LbMS14, LbMS16, LbMS20, LbMS21, LbMS24, LbMO16; Subgroup B: LbMO27, LbMO42, LbMS40, LbMT9, LbMT10; Subgroup C: LbMF24, LbMF25; Subgroup D: LbMA47.
162
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
C and D as L. rhamnosus and L. fermentum, respectively.
To establish the final phenotypic identification, all strains
A clear identification of species, especially within the
tested for their biochemical and physiological characteristics biochemical
genus Lactobacillus, based on phenotypic methods, such as
characterization, using API 50 CHL galleries (BioMérieux,
fermentation patterns, may sometimes be difficult, due to an
Lyon, France). The programme of identification (Cox and
increasing number of lactic acid bacteria species which vary on
Thomson, Biochemistry institute, Odense University) plus
a small number of biochemical traits (36). Commercially
database was used for the interpretation of the strains
available systems based on carbohydrate fermentation should
fermentation profiles (Table 2). The strains of the subgroups A
be combined with conventional phenotypic properties other
and B were classified as L. plantarum and those of subgroups
than carbohydrate fermentation or with genotypic techniques.
(Table
1),
were
submitted
to
further
Table 2. Fermentation of carbohydrates by Lactobacillus strains from Algerian goat’s milk, tested by the API 50 CHL system Groups
A
B
C
D
Isolates
LbMA9 LbMF13 LbMF33 LbMS4 LbMS9 LbMS20 LbMS14 LbMS16 LbMS24 LbMS21 LbMO16
LbMO27 LbMO42 LbMS40 LbMT9 LbMT10
LbMF24 LbMF25
LbMA47
Glycerol
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
L-Arabinose
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
L-Sorbose
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dulcitol Mathyl- DMannopyranoside Mathyle-DGlucopyrannoside N-Acetylglucosamine
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Amygdalin
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
D-Melibiose
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
D-Melezitose
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Starch
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
D-Tagatose
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
D-Arabitol
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L-Arabitol + + + + + + + + + + + +: Positive reaction; -: Negative reaction. All isolates were able to ferment D-ribose, D-galactose, D-glucose,D-fructose,D-mannose, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, arbutin, esculin, salicin, D-celibiose, Dmaltose, D-lactose, D-sucrose, D-trehalose, D-raffinose, gentibiose, D-turanose and gluconate. None fermented erythriol, D-arabinose, D-xylose, L-xylose, Dadonitol, methyl- -D-xylopyranoside, inositol, inulin, glycogen, xylitol, D-rhamnose, D-fucose, L-fucose, 2-ketogluconate and 5-ketogluconate.
-
-
-
-
-
-
163
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
Genotypic identification of the isolates by 16S rDNA
acknowledged that L. plantarum and L. pentosus belong to the
sequencing
same 16S rRNA phylogenetic group and could only be
The 16S rDNA of the 11 strains of subgroup A and 5 isolates of the subgroup B was amplified by 27F and 558R
distinguished using phylogenetic analysis of sequences of the 16S-23S large spacer region (22).
primers, as reported by Acedo-Félix and Pérez-Martinez (1).
The comparative evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic
By partial sequencing of 16S rDNA all strains belonging to the
results confirmed that the phenotypic test, in spite of giving
subgroup A were classified as L. plantarum. Of the 5 isolates
information on the biochemical and metabolic traits of LAB,
forming subgroup B, 60% were identified as L. pentosus,
are not reliable enough for the identification of these
(LbMS40, LbMT9 and LbMT10) and 40% as L. plantarum
microorganisms, although it is a useful tool for presumptive
(LbMO42, and LbMO27). The 16S rDNA of two isolates of
classification. Lactobacillus UFV H2B20, a probiotic strain,
subgroup C were amplified with primers 27F and 1525R and
for example, which was first identified as L. acidophilus based
identified as L. rhamnosus (LbMF24 and LbMF25). The 16S
on its sugar fermentation profile (38), was afterwards classified
rDNA of the isolate of subgroup D was amplified by the
as L. delbrueckii using molecular methods (16). One major
primers used for subgroup C and identified as L. fermentum
reason for the mismatch between phenotypic and genotypic
(LbMA 47).
data might be ascribed to loosing or acquiring plasmids, which
Results of the PCR assay correlated with those obtained
leads to metabolite inconsistencies, as some carbohydrate
using the API 50 CHL system for 13 isolates identified as L.
fermentation capacities are plasmid encoded (2). Genotypic
plantarum, 2 isolates as L. rhamnosus, and one isolate as L.
techniques are doubtlessly rapid and accurate tools for the
fermentum. However, three isolates identified as L. plantarum
identification of LAB. The advantages of genotyping include
by the API system were found to be L. pentosus by sequencing
the stability of genomic DNA, its composition being
16S rDNA (Table 3). This result is not surprising, given that
independent of cultural conditions or preparation methods, and
the two species themselves have very similar 16S rDNA
amenability to automation and statistical data analysis (21).
sequences that differ only by 2pb (19). In fact, it is widely Table 3. Phenotypic and genotypic identification of Lactobacillus isolated from Algerian goat’s milk. Phenotypic dentification
Isolates
Genotypic identification (16S rDNA)
Most similar sequence (Acc. Nº)
Lactobacillus plantarum L. plantarum L. plantarum
LbMA9, LbMO16, LbMO27 LbMF13 LbMF33 LbMS4, LbMS9, LbMS14, LbMS16, LbMS20, LbMS21,LbMS24 LbMO42 LbMS40, LbMT9 LbMT10 LbMF24,LbMF25 LbMA47
Lactobacillus plantarum L. plantarum L. plantarum
AB362768.1 EF185922.1 AB362758.1
L. plantarum
EU257480.1
L. plantarum L. pentosus L. pentosus L. rhamnosus L. fermentum
AB362625.1 AB362758.1 AB362712.1 AB008211.1 AB362626.1
L. plantarum L. plantarum L. plantarum L. plantarum L. rhamnosus L. fermentum
Technological characteristics of strains
skim milk are shown in Table 4. Milk pH after 24 h of
Results on acidifying activity of Lactobacillus strains
incubation varied between 4.40 and 5.54 for all cultures. All
isolated from goat’s milk, after 6, 12 and 24 h of growth in
Lactobacillus isolates tested reduced the pH of milk to 6.43
164
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
(6.12 - 6.43) after 6 h of growth, except for strains
species (49).
LbMA47,LbMS21 and LbMS16 which, respectively, were able
L. pentosus and L. rhamnosus strains showed a more
to decrease milk pH to values 5.31, 5.78 and 5.97. After 12 h,
homogenous acidifying behaviour. Strains of the first species
the pH values ranged from 5.24 (LbMS21) to 5.94 (LbMT10),
had a medium acidifying capacity with pH ranging between
while after 24 h, 47.37% of the strains had lowered milk pH to
0.43 and 0.58 pH units, after 6 h of incubation and achieved
4.40 - 4.96. According to their ability to reduce the pH more or
1.18-1.30 pH units until 24 h. Furthermore, the two L.
less rapidly, three clusters of L. plantarum isolates were
rhamnosus strains showed a fast acidifying activity, with
observed. (i) Slow acidifying strains (cluster I, 23% of L.
values of pH 0.63 and of 0.69 pH units after 6 h. After 24 h of
plantarum strains) showed a slow rate of acidifying ability
incubation the pH reached values of 1.87 and 1.96 pH units.
during the first 6 h of incubation ( pH ranging between 0.27-
L. fermentum strain showed the lowest rate of acidifying: pH
0.40 pH units). These L. plantarum strains lowered the
pH
0.25 pH units after 6 h and resulted in pH 1.35 pH units until
values between 0.86-1.01 pH units and 1.33-1.60 pH units after
24 h of incubation. Generally, L. plantarum strains produce
12 h and 24 h of incubation, respectively. (ii) Medium
acid more rapidly, when compared to other lactobacilli (41,
acidifying L. plantarum strains (cluster II) showed a faster rate
14). The fast acidifying strains (mostly L. plantarum and L.
of acidifying ability after 6 h of incubation, with a pH ranging
rhamnosus isolates) should be selected as part of a starter
between 0.50 and 0.57 pH units. In this cluster, two subgroups
preparation.
were observed with different behaviours in their acidifying
Seven isolates of L. plantarum strains and two L.
capacity. The first subgroup A (31% of L. plantarum strains) in
rhamnosus were able to coagulate skim milk, when inoculated
which the
pH values was achieved, respectively, 0.78-0.98
in skim milk after 24 h at 30 °C (Table 4). None of the L.
and 1.16-1.74 pH units, after 12 h and 24 h of incubation. On
pentosus and L. fermentum strains were able to coagulate milk.
the other hand, the second subgroup B (31% of L. plantarum
Coagulation of milk by some strains of L. plantarum and two
strains) showed a faster acidification rate. This subgroup
strains of L. rhamnosus revealed their potential as starters or
included L. plantarum strains showing a similar acidifying
adjunct cultures in production of fermented dairy food products
activity until 6 h but capable of achieving pH values ranging
(34).
between 1.05-1.13 and 1.96-2.14 pH units after 12 h and 24 h
Many strains of LAB produce exopolysaccharide (EPS),
of incubation.(iii) Fast acidifying L. plantarum strains (15% of
which might be a capsule, closely attached as slim (9). The
L. plantarum strains) showed the highest acidifying capacity.
production of EPS by Lactobacillus strains was examined in
This two L. plantarum strains, LbMS16 and LbMS21, showed
milk culture and on ruthenium red milk plates. Ruthenium red
a fast rate of acidifying ability until 6 h (0.73 and 0.92 pH units
stains the bacterial cell wall, thus producing red colonies for
respectively). This high capacity of acidifying milk by strains
nonropy strains. Production of EPS prevents this staining, and
of this cluster was also shown after 12 h and 24 h of
hence ropy colonies appear white on the same plates (44). The
incubation:
pH values were achieved, respectively, 1.31 to
results revealed EPS-production by isolated Lactobacillus
2.20 pH units for LbMS16 and 1.46 to 2.30 pH units for
strains (Table 4). Among the Lactobacillus strains tested, eight
LbMS21. Result of acidifying capacity of L. plantarum strains
showed EPS-production. Four L. plantarum (LbMS14,
after 6 h and 12 h of incubation is in agreement with several
LbMS16, LbMO16 and LbMO27 strains), two L. rharmnosus
authors (14, 23). In contrast, the acidifying rate of isolates after
(LbMF24 and LbMF25 strains), one L. pentosus (LbMT10
24 h of incubation was lower than those reported in the former
strain) and one L. fermentum (LbMA47 strain) produced EPS.
studies. The possibility to find groups of strains characterized
Exopolysaccharides play a major industrial role in the
by different acidifying ability is frequent in L. plantarum
production of fermented products, in particular for the
165
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
production of yoghurt, drinking yoghurt, cheese, fermented
Eleven percent of strains presented high activity to release Ala-
cream and milk-based desserts (18).
ρNA (13.12-14.10 U) and 16% of strains showed high ability
Results on aminopeptidase (AP) activity of 19 strains of
to release Leu-ρNA (10.10-11.37 U). Twenty six percent of
Lactobacillus strains tested using (Ala-ρNa and Leu-ρNa) are
tested strains presented medium Ala-aminopeptidase activity
shown in Figure 1. Amino acids released from peptides derived
(6.14-8.35 U) and 26% Leu-aminopeptidase (5.15-9.70 U).
from hydrolysis of casein may contribute directly or indirectly
However, 63% of isolates revealed low activity to degrade Ala-
for the development of flavour during ripening of cheese (48).
ρNA (1.02-4.93 U) and 58% to release Leu-ρNA (0.95-4.32
The proteolytic activity of dairy LAB is essential for the
U). All tested strains of L. pentosus, L. rhamnosus, and L.
bacterial growth in milk and it is involved in the development
fermentum exhibited low AP activity, except for L. pentosus
of sensory properties of different fermented milk products (11).
LbMT10 strain, which had medium Leu-aminopeptidase
Tested strains exhibiting aminopeptidase activity ranging
activity. Concerning the results obtained for L. plantarum
between 1.02 and 14.10 U for L-alanine-ρNA and 0.95 to
strains, two strains (LbMF13 and LbMO16) had high Ala-
11.37 U for L-leucine-ρNA. The AP was divided, according to
aminopeptidase activity and four strains (LbMS14, LbMS16,
the activity of each strain to high, medium and low activity.
LbMS24 and LbMO16) had high Leu-aminopeptidase activity.
Figure1. Aminopeptidase activity of strains of the Lactobacillus tested in this study.
Well diffusion assay was used to screen 19 Lactobacillus
932T) (Table 4). Bacteriocin like antimicrobial compound
strains isolated from goat’s milk for their antibacterial activities
production was indicated by a zone of clearing of more than 1
against several pathogenic indicator bacteria (Staphylococcus
mm against at least one of the indicator bacteria tested. The
T
aureus CECT 86 , Staphylococcus aureus UT 602, Bacillus
cell-free supernatants of five L. plantarum strains (38.46 %,
cereus INRA AVZ421 and Listeria monocytogenes CECT
LbMA9, LbMF13, LbMS14, LbMS24 and LbMO16) produced
166
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
an inhibition zone on agar against S. aureus CECT 86T and S.
according to Charteris et al. (10). All Lactobacillus strains
aureus UT 602 and three L. plantarum strains (23,07%,
isolated from goat’s milk were assayed for their susceptibility
LbMF13, LbMS24, and LbMO16) against Bacillus cereus
to eight antibiotics, using the disk diffusion method. Zone
AVZ 421. Antibacterial activity is a relatively frequent feature
diameters were measured, and strains were classified as,
of L. plantarum natural isolates (46). However, one strain of L.
susceptible (S), moderately susceptible (MS), and resistant (R)
rhamnosus strain (LbMF25) showed antimicrobial activity
(Table 4). No strains of Lactobacillus were totally susceptible
against S. aureus CECT 86T and S. aureus UT 602.
to all antibiotics tested and multiple resistances to most
Nevertheless, none of the tested strains of L. pentostus and L.
antibiotics were observed. Most strains were susceptible to -
fermentum displayed inhibitory activity against any of the
lactam, inhibitors of cell wall synthesis (penicillin G and
indicator bacteria. In addition, all strains tested were inactive
ampicillin). Some tested strains are moderately susceptible to
T
against Listeria monocytogenes CECT 932 . Complete
the former antibiotics. However, two L. plantarum strains,
inactivation of the antimicrobial activity was observed after
LbMO42 and LbMS24, were resistant to penicillin G or
treatment with proteinase K, indicating the proteinaceous
ampicillin, respectively, and one L. pentosus strain (LbMT9)
nature of the antimicrobial compound, whereas treatment with
was resistant to these two antibiotics simultaneously. Several
heat did not affect the inhibitory activity. Bacteriocins
studies
produced by LAB are of particular interest because of their
susceptibility to almost all penicillins (10). Nevertheless, the
potential use as natural food preservatives. The antibacterial
resistance of Lactobacillus strains to penicillin G and
activity potential of some L. plantarum strains against
ampicillin has been described in other studies (45, 13, 24).
Staphylococcus aureus (37, 6) and Bacillus cereus (6) has been previously reported.
report
that
species
of
lactobacilli
exhibited
Our result show that all tested strains were resistant to vancomycin, which is equally a cell wall synthesis inhibitor
Our results confirm the high incidence of bacteriocin-
(non- -lactam).
Resistance
of
Lactobacillus
species
to
producing lactic acid bacteria in milk samples, with inhibitory
vancomycin is due to the presence of D-Ala-D-lactate in their
activity against both pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms.
peptidoglycan, rather than the D-ala-D-ala dipeptide (28). Such
Goat’s milk may represent a source of new Lactobacillus
resistance is usually intrinsic, that is, chromosomally encoded
strains with the potential to inhibit undesirable and pathogenic
and nontransmissible (27). Concerning the protein synthesis
microorganisms for use in the biopreservation of dairy
inhibitors, all strains tested were susceptible to tetracyclin,
products. The resistance to high temperature, the proteinaceous
erythromycin and resistant to kanamycin and gentamycin.
nature, and the spectrum of activity of these antimicrobial
Lactobacilli are generally susceptible to antibiotics which
compound are advantageous for their use as biopreservatives in
inhibit the synthesis of proteins, such as erythromycin and
food (37).
tetracycline and more resistant to aminoglycosides (kanamycin and gentamicin) (10). Chloramphenicol inhibited most tested
Antibiotic resistance
strains. Three Lactobacillus strains showed a moderate
A key requirement for probiotic strains is that they should
susceptibility and one L. plantarum (LbMO42) strain was
not carry transferable antibiotic resistance genes. Transferable
resistant to this antibiotic. The high natural susceptibility of
resistance genes may pose a risk, as they can be transferred to
lactobacilli to chloramphenicol (protein synthesis inhibitor) is
pathogenic
well known (10, 45).
bacteria
(4).
In
this
study,
antibacterial
susceptibility testing of Lactobacillus strains was made
167
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
Table 4. Technological characteristics and antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Algerian goat’s milk pH Strains L. plantarum LbMA9 LbMF13 LbMF33 LbMS4 LbMS9 LbMS14 LbMS16 LbMS20 LbMS21 LbMS24 LbMO16 LbMO27 LbMO42 L. pentosus LbMS40 LbMT9 LbMT10 L. rhamnosus LbMF24 LbMF25 L. fermentum LbMA47
Coagulation EPS
Antibacterial activity
Antibiotics
S. aureus S. aureus CECT 86a UT 602b
Bacillus cereus Listeria INRA AVZ monocytogenes 421c CECT 932a
P
A
V
T
E
K
G
C
+ + + + -
+ + + + + -
+ + + + + -
+ + + -
-
MS S S S S S S MS S S S S R
S MS MS S S S S S S R MS S S
R R R R R R R R R R R R R
S S S S S S S S S S S S S
S S S S S S S S S S S S S
R R R R R R R R R R R R R
R R R R R R R R R R R R R
S S S S S S S S S S MS S R
-
+
-
-
-
-
S R S
S R MS
R R R
S S S
S S S
R R R
R R R
MS S S
1.87 1.96
+ +
+ +
+
+
-
-
S S
S S
R R
S S
S S
R R
R R
S S
1.35
-
+
-
-
-
-
S
MS
R
S
S
R
R
MS
6h
12h
24h
24h
0.27 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.51 0.56 0.73 0.57 0.92 0.56 0.27 0.56 0.40
1.01 0.97 0.78 1.05 1.13 1.11 1.31 1.07 1.46 0.91 0.89 0.98 0.86
1.60 1.46 1.16 2.14 1.97 2.07 2.20 1.96 2.30 1.49 1.43 1.74 1.33
+ + + + + + + -
0.43 0.56 0.53
0.89 1.19 0.76
1.29 1.3 1.18
0.63 0.69
1.10 1.40
0.25
0.83
+: Positive reaction; -: Negative reaction. EPS: Exopolysaccharide production (a) CECT: Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo, Valencia, Spain (b) U.T: University of Tlemcen laboratory collection, Algeria (c) INRA AVZ : Station de Technologie des Produits Végétaux, Institut national de la Recherche Agronomique, Avignon, France (INRA) PG: penicillin (10µg); A: ampicillin (10µg); V: vancomycin (30µg); T: tetracycline (30µg); E: erythromycin (15µg); K: kanamycin (30µg); G: gentamicin (10µg); C: chloramphenicol (30µg). S: sensitive strain; MS: moderately resistant strains; R: resistant strain.
168
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
With regard to antibiotic susceptibility profiles, L.
noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License
plantarum strain (LbMO42) and L. pentosus strain (LbMT9)
REFERENCES
showed the highest resistance to 5 of the 8 antibiotics tested. At present, multiresistance seems to be uncommon among LAB
1.
between Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei ATTCC 393T and a commonly
species, but an increasing number of strains displaying atypical
used plasmid-cured derivative revealed by a polyphasic study. Int. J. Syst.
resistance levels to some antibiotics are being isolated (3). Development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is mainly
Evol. Microbiol., 53: 67-75. 2.
overuse of antibiotics in veterinary medicine as therapeutic
325. 3.
24: 559-570. 4.
lactic acid bacteria from slightly fermented sausages. J. Appl. Microbiol.,
systems should be systematically monitored for resistances, in
100: 40-49. 5.
Badis, A.; Guetarni, D.; Moussa-Boudjema, B.; Henni, D.E.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Kihal, M. (2004). Identification and technological properties of
In conclusion, as far as we know, this is the first report on
lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw goat’s milk of four Algerian races.
the genetic identification of Lactobacillus strains using 16S rDNA sequence of Algeria goat’s milk isolates. This molecular
Aymerich, T.; Martin, B.; Garriga, M.; Vidal-Carou, M.C.; Bover-Cid, S.; Hugas, M. (2006). Safety properties and molecular strain typing of
LAB. Therefore, strains intended to be used in feed and food order to avoid their inclusion as starters and probiotics (3).
Ammor, M.S.; Flóre, A.B.; Mayo, B. (2007). Antibiotic resistance in nonenterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacterium. Food Microbiol.,
agents, prophylactics and animal growth promoters on farms may favour the development of resistance to antibiotics among
Ahrné, S.; Molin, G.; Stahl, S. (1989). Plasmids in Lactobacillus strains isolated from meat and meat products. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 11: 320-
based on two factors, the presence of resistance genes and the selective pressure through the use of antibiotics (29). The
Acedo-Félix, E.; Pérez-Martínez, G. (2003). Significant differences
Food Microbiol., 2: 579-588. 6.
Ben Omar, N.; Abriouel, H.; Lucas, R.; Martínez-Cañamero, M.; Guyot,
method distinguishes the closely related species L. plantarum
J-P.; Gálvez, A. (2006). Isolation of bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus
and L. pentosus identified using physiological features and API
plantarum strains from ben saalga, a traditional fermented gruel from
50 CHL system as L. plantarum. Results on technological properties suggest the pontential of some of L. plantarum (LbMS16 and LbMS21) and L. rhamnosus (LbMF25) strains
Burkina Faso. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 112: 44-50. 7.
Algerian traditional cheese, El-Klila. J. Sci. Food Agric., 70: 501-505. 8.
tested in mixed cultures, in order to obtain fermented dairy product with sensorial characteristics similar to those of artisanal products. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A.Marroki expresses his gratitude to the “Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique Algérien" and "University of Oran- Es-Sénia-Oran" for a
Bringel, F.;Curk, M-C.; Huert, J-C. (1996). Characterization of Lactobacillus by Southern-Type hybridation with a Lactobacillus
as starter cultures in the manufacture of artisanal fermented dairy product in Algeria. Moreover, these strains should be
Boubekri, K.; Ohta, Y. (1996). Identification of lactic acid bacteria from
plantarum pyr DFE probe. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 46: 588-594. 9.
Cerning, J. (1990). Exocellular polysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 87: 113-130.
10. Charteris, W.P.; Kelly, P.M.; Morelli, L.; Collins, J.K. (1998). Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species. J. Food. Prot., 61: 1636-1643. 11. Christensen, J.E.; Dudley, E.G.; Pederson, J.A.; Steele, J.L. (1999). Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek., 76: 217-246. 12. Coeuret, V.; Dubernet, S.; Bernardeau, M.; Gueguen, M.; Vernoux, J.P. (2003). Isolation, characterisation angbd identification of lactobacilli focusing mainly on cheeses and other dairy products. Lait., 83: 269-306.
research grant. This work was partially funded by a C.S.I.C.
13. Coppola, R.; Succi, M.; Tremonte, P.; Reale, A.; Salzano, G.; Sorrentino,
project (Ref. 2006 7 0I 097) and the Spanish Ministry of
E. (2005). Antibiotic suscebtibility of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains
Science and Innovation (Consolider Fun-C-Food CSD2007-
isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. Lait., 85: 193-204.
00063).
14. Dagdemir, E.; Ozdemir, S. (2008). Technological characterization of the natural lactic acid bacteria of artisanal Turkish white pickled cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 61: 133-140.
All the content of the journal, except where otherwise
15. Dellaglio, H.; De Roissart; H.; Torriani, S.; Curk, M.C.; Janssens, D.
169
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
(1994). Caractéristiques générales des bactéries lactiques. In : de Roissart,
30. Linaje, R.; Coloma, M.D.; Pérez-Martinez, G.; Zúñiga, M. (2004).
H.; Luquet, F.M. (eds) Les bactéries lactiques : aspects fondamentaux et
Characterization of faecal enterococci from rabbits for the selection of probiotic strains. J. Appl. Microbiol., 96: 161-771.
technologiques. Lorica, Uriage, p. 25-116. 16. De Magalhães, J.T.; Uetanabaro, A.P.T.; de Moraes, C.A. (2008).
31. Macedo, A.C.; Viera, M.; Poças, R.; Malcata, F.X. (2000). Peptide
Identification of Lactobacillus UFV H2B2 (Probiotic strain) using DNA-
hydrolase system of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Serra de Estrela
DNA hybridation. Braz. J. Microbiol., 39: 524-546.
cheese. Int. Dairy J., 10: 769-774.
17. De Man, J.C.; Rogosa, M.; Sharp, M.E. (1960). A medium for the
32. Müller, T. (1990). Comparaison of methods for differentiation between homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Zentralbl.
cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 23: 130-135. 18. De Vuyst, L.; Degeest, B. (1999). Heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid
Mikrobiol., 145: 363-3666. 33. Nigatu, A. (2000). Evaluation of numerical analyses of RAPD and API
bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 23: 153-177. 19. Ennahar, S.; Cai, Y.; Fujita, Y. (2003). Phylogenetic diversity of lactic
50 CH patterns to differentiate Lactobacillus plantarum, Lact. fermentum,
acid bacteria associated with paddy rice silage as determined by 16S
Lact. rhamnosus, Lact sake, Lact. parabuchneri, Lact. gallinarum, Lact.
ribosomal DNA analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69: 444-451.
Gallinarum, Lact. casei, Weissella minor and related taxa isolated from
20. Estepar, J.; Del Mar Sánchez, M.; Alonso, L.; Mayo, B. (1999).
kocho and tef. J. Appl. Microbiol., 89: 969-978.
artisanal
34. Olasupo, N.A.; Shillinger, U.; Holzapfel, W.H. (2001). Studies on some
‘Peñamellera’ cheese: analysis of its indigenous lactic acid bacteria. Int.
technological properties of predominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from
Dairy J., 9: 737-746.
Nigerian fermented food. Food Microbiol., 15: 157-167.
Biochemical
and
microbiological
characterization
of
21. Fitzsimons, N.A.; Cogan, T.M.; Condon, S.; Beresford, T. (1999).
35. Psono, L.; Kotzamanides, C.; Andrighetto, C.; Lombardi, A.; Tzanetakis,
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of non-starter lactic acid
N.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. (2006). Genotypic and phenotypic
bacteria in mature Cheddar cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 3418-
heterogeneity in Enterococcus isolated from Batzos, a raw goat milk
3426.
cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 109: 109-120.
22. Hammes, W.P.; Vogel, R.F. (1995). The genus Lactobacillus. p. 19-54.
36. Quere, F.; Deschamps, A.; Urdaci, M.C. (1997). DNA probe and PCR-
In: Wood, B.J.B.; Holzapfel, W.H (eds), the genera of lactic acid bacteria,
specific reaction for Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Appl. Microbiol., 82:
vol. 2. The genera of lactic acid bacteria. Blackie Academic and
783-790.
Professional. London, United Kingdom. 23. Herreros, M.A.; Fresno, J.M.; González Prieto, M.J.; Tornadijo, M.E. (2003). Technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Armada cheese (a Spanish goat’s milk cheese). Int. Dairy. J., 13: 469479. 24. Herreros, M.A.; Sandoval, H.; González, L.; Castro, J.M.; Fresno, J.M.;
37. Rodríguez, E.; Gonzalez, B.; Gaya, P.; Nuñez, M.; Medina, M. (2000). Diversity of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw milk. Int. Dairy Journal., 10: 7-15 38. Sabioni, N.S.S.; Pinheiro, A.J.R.; Teixeira, M.A. (1998). Acidophilus milk: Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus from breast-fed children and from calves’ feces. Braz. J. Microbiol., 19: 393-
Tornadijo, M.E. (2005). Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic resistance
398.
of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Armada cheese (a Spanish goats’
39. Sánchez,
milk cheese). Food Microbiol., 22: 455-459. 25. Jayne-Williams, D.J. (1976). The application of miniaturized methods for characterization of various organisms isolated from the animal gut. J. Appl. Microbiol., 40: 189-200. 26. Kandler, O.; Weiss, N. (1986). Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, 212
I.;
Palop,
L.;
Ballesteros,
C.
(2000).
Biochemical
characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from spontaneous fermentation of ‘Almagro’ eggplantes. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 59: 9-17. 40. Schleifer, K.H.; Ehrmann, M.; Beimfohr, C.; Brokmann, E.; Ludwig, W.; Amann, R. (1995). Application of molecular methods for classification and identification of lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J., 5: 1081-1094.
AL. In: Sneath, P.H.A.; Mair, N.S.; Sharpe, M.E.; Holt, J.G. (eds.)
41. Seseña, S.; Sánchez, I.; Palop, L. (2005). Characterization of
Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. vol 2, Baltimore, Williams
Lactobacillus strains and monitoring by RAPD-PCR in controlled
& Wilkins , p. 1209-1234.
fermentations of “Almagro” eggplants. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 104: 325-
27. Klein, G.; Pack, A.; Bonapartes, C.; Reuter, G. (1998). Taxonomy and physiology of probiotic lactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 41: 103-125. 28. Klein, G.; Halmann, C.; Casas, I.A.; Abad, J.; Louwers, J.; Reuter, G. (2000). Exclusion of vanA, vanB and vanC type glycopeptides resistance in starters of Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus rhamnosus used as probiotics by polymerase chain reaction and hybridation methods. J. Appl. Microbiol., 89: 815-824. 29. Levy, S.B. (1992). The antibiotic paradox: How Miracle Drugs are Destroying the Miracle. Plenum Press, New York, p 279.
335. 42. Sharpe, M.E. (1979). Identification of the lactic acid bacteria. In: Skinner, F.A.; Lovelock, D.W. (eds.) Identification Methods for Microbiologists, Academic Press, London, p. 233-259. 43. Stiles, M.E.; Holzapfel, W.H. (1997). Lactic acid bacteria of food and their current taxonomy. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 36: 1-29. 44. Stingler, F.; Neeser, J.R.; Mollet, B. (1996). Identification and characterization of the eps (Exopolysaccharide) gene cluster from Streptococcus thermophilus Sfi6. J. Bacteriol., 178: 1680-1690.
170
Marroki, A. et al.
Characterization of Lactobacillus and their technological properties
45. Temmerman, R.; Pot, B.; Huys, G.; Swings. J. (2003). Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 81: 1-10. 46. Todorov, D.S. (2009). Bacteriocins from Lactobacillus plantarumproduction, genetic organization and mode of action. Braz. J. Microbiol., 40: 209-221. 47. Vandamme, P.; Pot, B.; Gillis, M.; De Vos, P.; Kersters, K.; Swings, J. (1996). Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematic. Microbiol. Rev., 60: 407-438. 48. Williams, A.G.; Felipe, X.; Banks, J.M. (1998). Aminopeptidase and dipeptidyl peptidase activity of Lactobacillus spp. And non-starter lactic
255-266. 49. Xanthopoulos, V.; Hatzikamari, M.; Adamidis, T.; Tzaneetakis, N.; Tsakalidou, E.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. (2000). Heterogeneity of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Feta cheese throughout ripening. J. Appl. Microbiol., 88: 1056-1064. 50. Zanoni, P.; Farrow, J.A.E.; Phillips, B.A.; Collins, M.D. (1987). Lactobacillus pentosus (Fred, Peterson, and Anderson) sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 37: 339-341. 51. Zotta, T.; Ricciardi, A.; Parente, E. (2007). Enzymatic activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Cornetto di Matera sourdoughs. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 115: 165-172.
acid bacteria (NSLAB) isolated from Chaddar cheese. Int. Dairy J., 8:
171