Characterization of macroalgal epiphytes on Thalassia testudinum ...

3 downloads 0 Views 6MB Size Report
Aug 28, 2010 - Seagrass epiphyte blooms potentially have important economic and ecological consequences in Tampa Bay, one of the Gulf of Mexico's ...
Research Article Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153 DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141 Open Access

Characterization of macroalgal epiphytes on Thalassia testudinum and Syringodium filiforme seagrass in Tampa Bay, Florida Boo Yeon Won1, Kim K. Yates2, Suzanne Fredericq3 and Tae Oh Cho1,* Department of Marine Life Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA 3 Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70506-2451, USA 1 2

Seagrass epiphyte blooms potentially have important economic and ecological consequences in Tampa Bay, one of the Gulf of Mexico’s largest estuaries. As part of a Tampa Bay pilot study to monitor the impact of environmental stresses, precise characterization of epiphyte diversity is required for efficient management of affected resources. Thus, epiphyte diversity may be used as a rational basis for assessment of ecosystem health. In May 2001, epiphytic species encompassing green, brown and red macroalgae were manually collected from dense and sparse seagrass beds of Thalassia testudinum and Syringodium filiforme. A total of 20 macroalgal epiphytes, 2 Chlorophyta, 2 Phaeophyta, and 16 Rhodophyta, were found on T. testudinum and S. filiforme seagrass at the four sampling sites (Bishop Harbor, Cockroach Bay, Feather Sound, and Mariposa Key). The Rhodophyta, represented by 16 species, dominated the numbers of species. Among them, the thin-crusted Hydrolithon farinosum was the most commonly found epiphyte on seagrass leaves. Species number, as well as species frequency of epiphytes, is higher at dense seagrass sites than sparse seagrass sites. Four attachment patterns of epiphytes can be classified according to cortex and rhizoid development: 1) creeping, 2) erect, 3) creeping & erect, and 4) erect & holding. The creeping type is characterized by an encrusting thallus without a rhizoid or holdfast base. Characteristics of the erect type include a filamentous thallus with or without a cortex, and a rhizoid or holdfast base. The creeping and erect type is characterized by a filamentous thallus with a cortex and rhizoid. A filamentous thallus with a cortex, holdfast base, and host holding branch is characteristics of the erect and holdfast attachment type. This study characterized each species found on the seagrass for epiphyte identification. Key Words: epiphytes; Florida; seagrass; Syringodium filiforme; Tampa Bay; taxonomy; Thalassia testudinum

INTRODUCTION Seagrass meadows are very productive ecosystems of which a large proportion is often attributed to epiphytes (Heijs 1984, Leliaert et al. 2001). Seven seagrass species occur in Florida: Syringodium filiforme, Halodule beaudettei, Halophila johnsonii, Thalassia testudinum, Halophila decipiens, Halophila engelmannii and Ruppia

maritima (Virnstein and Cairns 1986, Dawes et al. 1995). Seagrass affects sedimentation by baffling currents with long leaves and providing substrates suitable for diverse epiphytic biota (Land 1970, Almasi et al. 1987, Koch 1999, Hemminga and Duarte 2000). Among these, T. testudinum (Banks ex König) and S. filiforme (Kützing) domi-

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received 1 August 2010, Accepted 28 August 2010

Copyright © 2010 The Korean Society of Phycology

*

Corresponding Author

E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +82-62-230-7161, Fax: +82-62-230-7467

141

http://e-algae.kr pISSN: 1226-2617 eISSN: 2093-0860

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

nate in the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico (Eiseman 1980). Seagrass epiphytes are very important components of the meadows. At least 113 epiphytes and up to 120 macroalgal species have been identified from Florida seagrass blades and communities, respectively (Dawes 1987). Although lists and ecological studies about epiphytes on T. testudinum and S. filiforme have been conducted, studies have not reported detailed characterization of macroalgal epiphytes on these grasses. This paper characterizes macroalgal epiphytes and determines attachment patterns on seagrass blades of T. testudinum and S. filiforme. This study also compares macroalgal species composition between sites of sparse and dense seagrass beds.

abundance of epiphytes between sparse and dense sites.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Epiphytic species composition, species abundance, and attachment pattern As shown in Table 1, a total of 20 macroalgal epiphytes (2 Chlorophyta, 2 Phaeophyta, and 16 Rhodophyta) are found in T. testudinum and S. filiforme seagrass beds at the four sampling sites. Of them, four taxa, Acrochaetium, Griffithsia, Gayliella, and Ceramium, are not identified to species level because only single or small sized plants were found. Thus, sample size is insufficient for identification. This is relatively restricted when compared to other similar studies in Florida. Humm (1964) observed 113 species on T. testudinum in South Florida, and Ballantine and Humm (1975) mentioned 66 epiphytes on the 4 seagrass species in Florida. In this study, the number of epiphytes is less than in previous studies because previous research studies were conducted over several seasons. Rhodophyta exceeds 80% at the total species number. Of them, the thin-crusted Hydrolithon farinosum is the most commonly found epiphyte on seagrass leaves. It is similar to other results that indicate crustose Corallinaceae are the dominant epiphytic species on seagrasses (Heijs 1984, Leliaert et al. 2001). Although the epiphyte species of the genus Spyridia and Hypnea have been reported as drift macroalgae in seagrass systems (Dawes et al. 1985), they are also typical epiphytes on the seagrass in this study. The total species number of epiphytes on each narrow S. filiforme and wide T. testudinum is similar. However, epiphytic composition differs strongly between T. testu-

MATERIALS AND METHODS During the spring of 2002, seagrass shoots of T. testudinum and S. filiforme with epiphytes were collected from different subtidal biotopes at four sites around Tampa Bay, Florida, USA: Bishop Harbor, Cockroach Bay, Feather Sound, and Mariposa Key. To compare dense and sparse sites, seagrass beds were sampled by 50 cm × 50 cm quadrates. All samples were labeled and preserved in a 4% formaldehyde seawater solution for morphological observation. A detailed study of the epiphytes was carried out in the laboratory. Under a stereomicroscope, all epiphytes were separated from the seagrass leaves by gentle scraping. Epiphytes were stained with 1% aqueous aniline blue for anatomical study, characterization of macro-algal epiphytes, and species identification. Twenty-five seagrass leaves were selected and collected from each sparse and dense site. The number of all epiphytes on each blade was counted to compare species

Table 1. Comparison of epiphyte attachment patterns on Syringodium filiforme and Thalassia testudinum Attachment pattern

Species

Attached mode

Cortex

Attached part

Creeping

Hydrolithon farinosum

Encrusting

Absent

Whole thallus

Erect

Enteromorpha flexuosa, Cladophora prolifera, Hincksia mitchelliae, Sphacelaria rigidula, Stylonema alsidii, Acrochaetium sp., Griffithsia sp., Heterosiphonia crispella, Hypnea spinella, H. valentiae, Champia parvula, Polysiphonia flaccidissima, Chondria collinsiana Herposiphonia tenella, Centroceras gasparrinii, Gayliella sp., Ceramium sp.

Rhizoid­or disc-formed

Absent or present

Base

Rhizoidal bundle

Present

Creeping thallus

Hypnea musciformis, Spyridia filamentosa

Disc-formed & cortex

Present

Base and branches

Creeping & Erect Erect & Holding

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

142

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

dinum and S. filiforme even though they were collected from the same locality. Enteromorpha flexuosa, Sphacelaria rigidula, Griffithsia sp., and Ceramium sp. are found only on S. filiforme seagrass beds, while Cladophora prolifera, Hydrolithon farinosum, Hypnea valentiae, and Heterosiphonia crispella are found only on T. testudinum seagrass beds. Species number, as well as species frequency, of epiphytes is higher at dense seagrass sites than sparse seagrass sites. Fourteen epiphytes were identified from dense sites of S. filiforme seagrass beds, while 11 were identified from sparse sites. Five species, E. flexuosa, S. rigidula, Gayliella sp, Ceramium sp. Herposiphonia tenella, were collected only from dense sites, while two others, Acrochaetium sp., Griffithsia sp., were only collected from sparse sites. Fifteen epiphytes were identified from dense sites of T. testudinum seagrass beds, while 12 were identified from sparse sites. Four species, C. prolifera, Hypnea musciformis, H. valentiae, H. tenella, were collected from dense sites, while Heterosiphonia crispella was only collected from sparse sites. Since density of seagrass blades causes modifications of physical factors such as water movements, and it increases the possibil-

ity of attachment of macroalgal epiphytes to seagrass blades, a larger number of epiphytes may occur in dense sites. Species frequency of epiphytes on each blade of T. testudinum is also larger in dense sites (Fig. 1) As summarized in Table 1, four attachment patterns of epiphytes can be classified according to development of cortex and rhizoid: 1) creeping, 2) erect, 3) creeping & erect, and 4) erect & holding. The creeping type is characterized by an encrusting thallus without a rhizoid or holdfast base. This type is found in Hydrolithon farinosum. The erect type is characterized by a filamentous thallus with or without a cortex, and a rhizoid or holdfast base. This type is found in E. flexuosa, C. prolifera, Hincksia mitchelliae, S. rigidula, Stylonema alsidii, Hypnea spinella, H. valentiae, Champia parvula, Polysiphonia flaccidissima, H. crispella, Chondria collinsiana, Acrochaetium sp., and Griffithsia sp. The creeping and erect type is characterized by a filamentous thallus with a cortex and rhizoid. This type is found in Centroceras gasparrinii, H. tenella, Gayliella sp., and Ceramium sp. The erect and holdfast type is characterized by a filamentous thallus with a cortex, holdfast base, and host holding branch. This type is found in H. musciformis and Spyr-

Fig. 1. Abundance of epiphytic macroalgae expressed as the total number of individuals found on 25 Thalassia testudinum from each dense and sparse site.

143

http://e-algae.kr

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

idia filamentosa. Epiphytes with erect attachment patterns are common at dense sites, while epiphytes with creeping and erect attachment patterns are common at sparse sites.

The thallus is slender, erect, and about 1 cm high. Blades taper toward base and are cylindrical and hollow. Rhizoids form a tightly knit basal pad. Cladophora prolifera (Roth) Kützing 1843 (Figs 4-7) Basionym: Conferva prolifera Roth 1797; 182. The thallus is filamentous, pseudo-dichotomous or pseudo-trichotomous, branching, erect, and about 1 cm high. Filaments are straight to slightly curved. Rhizoids are formed from basal cells.

List and characterization of epiphytes Although most of these epiphytic species have previously been reported from Florida (Dawes 1987, Littler and Littler 2000), we characterize each species with detailed morphology.

Phaeophyta Chlorophyta Hincksia mitchelliae (Harvey) P. C. Silva in Silva et al. 1987 (Figs 8-10) Basionym: Ectocarpus mitchelliae Harvey 1852; 142.

Enteromorpha flexuosa (Wulfen) J. Agardh 1883 (Figs 2 & 3) Basionym: Ulva flexuosa Wulfen 1803.

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Figs 2 & 3. Enteromorpha flexuosa. Fig. 2. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 3. Cross section view. Scale bars represent: Fig. 2, 1 mm; Fig. 3, 100 µm. Figs 4-7. Cladophora prolifera. Fig. 4. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 5. Upper part of thallus. Fig. 6. Dichotomous branching. Fig. 7. Trichotomous branching. Scale bars represent: Fig. 4, l mm; Fig. 5, 100 µm; Fig. 6, 40 µm; Fig. 7, 40 µm. Figs 8-10. Hincksia mitchelliae. Fig. 8. Vegetative thallus with tapering apices (arrows). Fig. 9. Reproductive thallus. Fig. 10. Branch with plurilocular sporangia (S). Scale bars represent: Fig. 8, 0.5 mm; Fig. 9, 100 µm; Fig. 10, 40 µm. Figs 11 & 12. Sphacelaria rigidula. Fig. 11. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 12. Slender biradiate propagula (P). Scale bars represent: Fig. 11, 0.5 mm; Fig. 12, 100 µm.

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

144

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

The thallus is filamentous tufts or mats, erect, and 0.5 cm high. Filaments are irregularly branched, and taper toward apices. Plurilocular sporangia are cylindrical, rarely stalked, and lateral on filaments.

Holdfast is disc-like. Champia parvula (C. Agardh) Harvey 1853 (Figs 37-50) Basionym: Chondria parvula C. Agardh 1824; 207. The thallus is gelatinous, alternately branching, erect, and about 3-5 cm high. Branches are cylindrical to slightly flattened. Apices are bluntly pointed. Segments are swollen or barrel-shaped. The inner wall is lined with faint longitudinal filaments with sparsely scattered and oval gland cells. Spermatangia are in swollen spermatangial sori and produced from cortical cells. Cystocarps are protuberant with wide ostioles. Tetrasporangia are spherical, tetrahedrally divided, and produced on the inner side of cortical cell.

Sphacelaria rigidula Kützing 1843 (Figs 11 & 12) The thallus is filamentous, erect, and 0.3 cm high. Filaments are straight and cylindrical. Propagules have 2-3 cylindrical arms.

Rhodophyta Stylonema alsidii (Zanardini) Drew 1956 (Figs 13 & 14) Basionym: Bangia alsidii Zanardini 1839; 136. The thallus is erect, pseudodichotomously branched, and 0.2-0.3 cm high. Cells are discoid to ellipsoid.

Griffithsia sp. (Fig. 51) The thallus is monosiphonous, dichotomous, erect, and 1 cm high. Sterile filaments are whorled at upper ends of segments and trichotomously branched.

Acrochaetium sp. (Figs 15-17) The thallus is filamentous, erect, and 0.3-0.5 cm high. Cells are cylindrical or rod-shaped. Monosporangia are basal in lateral clusters and develop adaxially at the upper part of the cell.

Centroceras gasparrinii (Meneghini) Kützing 1849 (Figs 52-58) The thallus is filamentous, dichotomous, creeping and erect, and 2-4 cm high. Apices are incurved. The cortex is complete and has whorled spines. Spermatangia are in the terminal clusters of the node. Tetrasporangia are spherical, produced from periaxial cells, and protected by involucral branchlets. Recently, Won et al. (2009) resurrected this species based on morphological and molecular evidence.

Hydrolithon farinosum (J. V. Lamouroux) Penrose & Y. M. Chamberlain 1993 (Figs 18-24) Basionym: Melobesia farinose J. V. Lamouroux 1816; 315. The thallus is prostrate, thin, crusts, develops from an initial four-celled structure, and measures 0.3-0.5 cm diam. Tetrasporangial conceptacles are hemispherical and tetrasporangia are zonately divided. Hypnea musciformis (Wulfen) J. V. Lamouroux 1813 (Figs 25-29) Basionym: Fucus musciformis Wulfen in Jacquin 1791; 154. The thallus is tangled, wiry, erect, then coiled, and about 10-15 cm high. Apices are slightly upcurved, flattened hooks. Holdfast is disc-like, becoming more tangled by the coiled apex.

Gayliella sp. (Figs 59 & 60) The thallus consists of prostrate axes giving rise to erect axes, and is 0.2-0.3 cm high. The axis has four periaxial cells. Three cortical initials are produced per periaxial cell. Of them, basipetal cortical cells are produced horizontally and grow basipetally. This species is similar to Gayliella transversalis (Collins and Hervey) T. O. Cho and Fredericq reported from Key West, Florida by Cho et al. (2008), in that it may be distinguished by branching pattern.

H. spinella (C. Agardh) Kützing 1847 (Figs 30-33) Basionym: Sphaerococcus spinellus C. Agardh 1822; 323. The thallus is wiry, erect, and 5-6 cm. Apices are tapering and pointed, but not upcurved. Branchlets are spinelike and numerous. Holdfast is disc-like.

Ceramium sp. (Figs 61 & 62) The thallus is simple, filamentous, pseudo-dichotomous, creeping and erect, and 0.5 cm high. Cortication is incomplete. Two cortical cells are acropetally produced from a peraxial cell.

H. valentiae (Turner) Montagne1841 (Figs 34-36) Basionym: Fucus valentiae Turner 1808-1809; 17. The thallus is tough, wiry, erect, and 7-8 cm high. Apices are tapering and pointed, but not upcurved. Branchlets are spine-like and star-shaped with up to six points.

Herposiphonia tenella (C. Agardh) Ambronn 1880 (Fig. 63) Basionym: Hutchinsia tenella C. Agardh 1828; 105.

145

http://e-algae.kr

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

13

14

15

18

21

16

19

22

17

20

23

24

Figs 13 & 14. Stylonema alsidii. Fig. 13. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 14. Upper part of thallus with branch initials (arrow). Scale bars represent: Fig.13, 40 µm; Fig. 14, 40 µm. Figs 15-17. Acrochaetium sp. Fig. 15. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 16. Upper part of thallus with monosporangia (arrows). Fig. 17. Lower part of thallus with holdfast. Scale bars represent: Fig. 15, 100 µm; Fig. 16, 40 µm; Fig. 17, 40 µm. Figs 18-24. Hydrolithon farinosum. Fig.18. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 19. Four celled initials. Fig. 20. Cross section view of thallus on seagrass. Fig. 21. Female conceptacle. Fig. 22. Cross section view of female conceptacle. Fig. 23. Tetrasporangial conceptacle. Fig. 24. Cross section view of tetrasporangial conceptacle having tetrasporangia (T). Scale bars represent: Fig. 18, 100 µm; Fig. 19, 10 µm; Fig. 20, 40 µm; Fig. 21, 20 µm; Fig. 22, 40 µm; Fig. 23, 20 µm; Fig. 24, 40 µm.

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

146

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

25

29

33

26

27

30

28

31

34

35

32

36

Figs 25-29. Hypnea musciformis. Fig. 25. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 26. Curved apex. Fig. 27. Coiled apex. Fig. 28. Tangled branches (arrow). Fig. 29. Cross section view of thallus. Scale bars represent: Fig. 25, 1 mm; Fig. 26, 0.5 mm; Fig. 27, 0.5 mm; Fig. 28, 1 mm; Fig. 29, 50 µm. Figs 30-33. Hypnea spinella. Fig. 30. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 31. Upper part of thallus. Fig. 32. Spine-like branchlets (arrows) on middle part of thallus. Fig. 33. Cross section view of thallus. Scale bars represent: Fig. 30, 1 mm; Fig. 31, 1 mm; Fig. 32, 0.5 mm; Fig. 33, 50 µm. Figs 34-36. Hypnea valentiae. Fig. 34. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 35. Stellate branchlets (arrows) on middle part of thallus. Fig. 36. Cross section view of thallus. Scale bars represent: Fig. 34, 1 mm; Fig. 35, 0.5 mm; Fig. 36, 50 µm.

147

http://e-algae.kr

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

37

38

39

41

40

42

44

45

46

43

47

49

48

50

Figs 37-50. Champia parvula. Fig. 37. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 38. Surface showing the scattered small cells. Fig. 39. Cross section view through node. Fig. 40. Cross section view through internode. Fig. 41. Longitudinal section view of upper thallus. Fig. 42. Longitudinal section view of nodal part. Fig. 43. Longitudinal section view showing gland cell (arrow head) and longitudinal filaments (arrow). Fig. 44. Male branch with spermatangial sori. Fig. 45. Surface of spermatangial sori. Fig. 46. Cross section of male branch with spermatangia (S). Fig. 47. Female thallus with cystocarp (C). Fig. 48. Longitudinal section of cystocarp with carpospores. Fig. 49. Surface of tetrasporic thallus with tetrasporangia (T). Fig. 50. Cross section of tetrasporic thallus showing tetrasporangium developed from cortical cell. Scale bars represent: Fig. 37, 1 mm; Fig. 38, 40 µm; Fig. 39, 50 µm; Fig. 40, 50 µm; Fig. 41, 100 µm; Fig. 42, 50 µm; Fig. 43, 20 µm; Fig. 44, 0.5 mm; Fig. 45, 40 µm; Fig. 46, 40 µm; Fig. 47, 100 µm; Fig. 48, 100 µm; Fig. 49, 100 µm; Fig. 50, 20 µm.

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

148

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

51

52

55

53

56

54

57

61

58

62

59

60

63

Fig. 51. Griffithsia sp. Fig. 51. Vegetative thallus. Scale bar represents: 0.5 mm. Figs 52-58. Centroceras gasparrinii. Fig. 52. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 53. Cross section view through cortical node. Fig. 54. Cross section view through internode. Fig. 55. Creeping part of lower thallus having rhizoids (R). Fig. 56. Cortical node with spermatangia (S) of male thallus. Fig. 57. Tetrasporangial thallus. Fig. 58. Tetrasporangia (T) with involucral branches (arrows) in abaxial side. Scale bars represent: Fig. 52, 0.5 mm; Fig. 53, 20 µm; Fig. 54, 20 µm; Fig. 55, 100 µm; Fig. 56, 40 µm; Fig. 57, 0.5 mm; Fig. 58, 50 µm. Figs 59 & 60. Gayliella sp. Fig. 59. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 60. Creeping and erect parts of thallus. Scale bars represent: Fig. 59, 50 µm; Fig. 60, 100 µm. Figs 61 & 62. Ceramium sp. Fig. 61. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 62. Cortical nodes. Scale bars represent: Fig. 61, 100 µm; Fig. 62, 20 µm. Fig. 63. Herposiphonia tenella. Fig. 63. Male thallus. Scale bar represents: 100 µm.

149

http://e-algae.kr

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

64

65

66

68

67

69

70

71

72

Figs 64-67. Polysiphonia flacidissima. Fig. 64. Thallus. Fig. 65. Apex with prominent scar cells (arrow). Fig. 66. Cross section of thallus. Fig. 67. Cystocarp. Scale bars represent: Fig. 64, 0.5 mm; Fig. 65, 40 µm; Fig. 66, 20 µm; Fig. 67, 100 µm. Figs 68-70. Spyridia filamentosa. Fig. 68. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 69. Surface of axis. Fig. 70. Tangled branches (arrow). Scale bars represent: Fig. 68, 0.5 mm; Fig. 69, 40 µm; Fig. 70, 1 mm. Figs 71 & 72. Heterosiphonia crispella. Fig. 71. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 72. Branchlet. Scale bars represent: Fig. 71, 0.5 mm; Fig. 72, 100 µm.

The thallus is tangled, prostrate, creeping and erect, and 0.5 cm high. Branching is irregularly alternate. Rhizoids arise from each node.

about 7 cm high. Branchlets are delicate and unbranched, with incomplete cortication.

Polysiphonia flaccidissima Hollenberg 1942 (Figs 64-67) The thallus is filamentous, erect, and 0.3 cm high. Branching is irregularly alternate with four pericentral cells. Scar cells are common between segments and apical filaments are highly branched. Cystocarps are spherical and on short stalk.

Heterosiphonia crispella (C. Agardh) M. J. Wynne 1985 (Figs 71 & 72) Basionym: Callithamnion crispellum C. Agardh 1828; 183. The thallus is delicate, erect, not corticated, and 0.4 cm high. Branchlets are deciduous, and dichotomously to alternately branched. Our material is at a young plant stage.

Spyridia filamentosa (Wulfen) Harvey in W. Hooker 1833 (Figs 68-70) Basionym: Fucus filamentousus Wulfen 1803; 64. The thallus is filamentous, erect and then coiled, and

Chondria collinsiana M. Howe 1920 (Figs 73-85) The thallus is solitary, erect, and 0.8-1.2 cm high. There are 5-6 pericentral cells. Apices are truncate to slightly rounded and tufted with dichotomously branched fila-

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

150

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

73

74

75

77

76

78

82

80

79

83

84

81

85

Figs 73-85. Chondria collinsiana. Fig. 73. Vegetative thallus. Fig. 74. Surface view of thallus. Fig. 75. Apex. Fig. 76. Cross section of thallus. Fig. 77. Apical cell (arrow) of branch. Fig. 78. Male thallus. Fig. 79. Male apex with flat, disc like spermatangial sorus (arrows). Fig. 80. Spermatangial sorus with spermatangia (S). Fig. 81. Female thallus. Fig. 82. Young cystocarp (C). Fig. 83. Tetrasporic thallus. Fig. 84. Cross section of tetrasporic thallus with tetrasporangia (T). Fig. 85. Tetrasporangium developed from a pericentral cell (P). Scale bars represent: Fig. 73, 0.25 mm; Fig. 74, 40 µm; Fig. 75, 100 µm; Fig. 76, 50 µm; Fig. 77, 20 µm; Fig. 78, 0.5 mm; Fig. 79, 100 µm; Fig. 80, 100 µm; Fig. 81, 40 µm; Fig. 82, 100 µm; Fig. 83, 0.5 mm; Fig. 84, 100 µm; Fig. 85, 50 µm.

151

http://e-algae.kr

Algae 2010, 25(3): 141-153

ments. Tetrasporangia are spherical, tetrahedrally divided, and produced on branchlets. Spermatangial sori are disc-shaped, circular to oval, flat, and form at the base of apical filaments. Cystocarps are on the short stalk and spherical to oval.

Dawes, C. J., Hanisak, D. & Kenworthy, W. J. 1995. Seagrass biodiversity in the Indian River Lagoon. Bull. Mar. Sci. 57:59-66. Drew, K. M. 1956. Conferva ceramicola Lyngbye. Bot. Tidsskr. 53:67-74. Eiseman, N. J. 1980. An illustrated guide to the sea grasses of

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

the Indian River region of Florida. Technical Report No. 31. Harbor Branch Foundation Inc, Fort Pierce, 24 pp.

This work was supported by a 2009 research grant awarded to Tae Oh Cho by Chosun University.

Harvey, W. H. 1852. Nereis boreali-Americana. Part I. Melanospermeae. Smithsonian Contrib. Knowledge 3:1-150. Harvey, W. H. 1853. Nereis boreali-americana; or, contributions towards a history of the marine algae of the Atlan-

REFERENCES

tic and Pacific coasts of North America. Part II. Rhodospermeae. Smithsonian Contrib. Knowledge 5:1-258.

Agardh, C. A. 1822. Algae. In Kunth, C. S. (Ed.) Synopsis Plan-

Heijs, F. M. L. 1984. Annual biomass and production of epi-

tarum, Quas, in Itinere ad Plagam Aequinoctialem Or-

phytes in three monospecific seagrass communities

bis Novi, Collegerunt Al. de Humboldt et Am. Bonpland.

of Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.) Aschers. Aquat. Bot.

Levrault, Paris, pp. 1-16.

20:195-218.

Agardh, C. A. 1824. Systema algarum. Berling, Lund, 312 pp.

Hemminga, M. A. & Duarte, C. M. 2000. Seagrass ecology.

Agardh, C. A. 1828. Species algarum cognitae, cum synony-

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 310 pp.

mis, differentiis specificis et descriptionibus succinctis,

Hollenberg, G. J. 1942. An account of the species of Polysi-

vol. 2, part 1. Ernst Martitius, Greifswald, 189 pp.

phonia on the Pacific coast of North America. I. Oligosi-

Agardh, J. G. 1883. Till algernes systematik. Nya bidrag.

phonia. Am. J. Bot. 29:772-785.

(Tredje afdelningen.). Lunds Universitets Års-Skrift,

Hooker, W. J. 1833. Div. I. Inarticulatae. In Hooker, W. J. (Ed.)

Afdelningen for Mathematik och Naturvetenskap 19:1-

The English Flora of Sir James Edward Smith. Class XXIV.

177.

Cryptogamia. Vol. V. (or Vol. II of Dr. Hooker’s British flo-

Almasi, M. N., Hoskin, C. M., Reed, J. K. & Milo, J. 1987. Ef-

ra). Part I. Comprising the Mosses, Hepaticae, Lichens,

fects of natural and artificial Thalassia on rates of sedi-

Characeae and Algae. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown,

mentation. J. Sediment. Petrol. 57:901-906.

Green & Longman, London, pp. 250-259, 264-322.

Ambronn, H. 1880. Üeber einige Fälle von Bilateralität bei

Howe, M. A. 1920. Algae. In Britton, N. L. & Millspaugh, C.

den Florideen. Botanische Zeitung 38:161-174, 177-185,

F. (Eds.) The Bahama Flora. The Authors, New York, pp.

193-200, 209-216, 225-233.

553-618.

Ballantine, D. & Humm, H. J. 1975. Benthic algae of the An-

Humm, H. J. 1964. Epiphytes of the seagrass, Thalassia tes-

clote estuary I. Epiphytes of seagrass leaves. Fla. Sci.

tudinum, in Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 14:306-

38:150-162.

341.

Cho, T. O., Boo, S. M., Hommersand, M. H., Maggs, C. A.,

Jacquin, N. J. 1791. Collectanea ad botanicam, chemiam, et

McIvor, L. & Fredericq, S. 2008. Gayliella gen. nov. in

historiam naturalem spectantia, cum figuris, vol. 3. Of-

the tribe Ceramieae (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) based

ficina Wappleriana, Vindobonae, 306 pp.

on molecular and morphological evidence. J. Phycol.

Koch, E. W. 1999. Sediment resuspension in a shallow

44:721-738.

Thalassia testudinum banks ex König bed. Aquat. Bot.

Dawes, C. J. 1987. The dynamic seagrasses of the Gulf of

65:269-280.

Mexico and Florida coasts. Fla. Marine Research Publ.

Kützing, F. T. 1843. Phycologia generalis oder Anatomie, Phys-

No. 42. In Durako, M. J., Phillips, R. C. & Lewis, R. R. III

iologie und Systemkunde der Tange: Bearb. von Fried-

(Eds.) Proc. of Symp. on Subtropical Seagrasses of the

rich Traugott Kützing. Mit 80 farbig gedruckten Tafeln,

S.E. U. S., Aug 12 1985. Florida Department of Natural

gezeichnet und gravirt vom Verfasser. F. A. Brockhaus,

Resources, Bureau of Marine Research, St. Petersburg,

Leipzig, 458 pp.

FL.

Kützing, F. T. 1847. Diagnosen und Bemerkungen zu neuen

Dawes, C. J., Hall, M. O. & Riechert, R. K. 1985. Seasonal bio-

oder kritischen Algen. Bot. Zeit. 5:1-5, 22-25, 33-38, 52-

mass and energy content in seagrass communities on

55, 164-167, 177-180, 193-198, 219-223.

the West Coast of Florida. J. Coast. Res. 1:255-262.

DOI: 10.4490/algae.2010.25.3.141

Kützing, F. T. 1849. Species algarum. F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig,

152

Won et al. Macroalgal Epiphytes on Seagrasses

922 p.

Roth, A. W. 1797. Catalecta botanica quibus plantae novae et

Lamouroux, J. V. F. 1813. Essai sur les genres de la famille des

minus cognitae describuntur atque illustrantur. Fasc. 1.

thalassiophytes non articulées. Ann. Mus. Hist. Natl.

In Bibliopolo I. G. Mülleriano, Leipzig, 244 pp.

Paris 20:21-47, 115-139, 267-293.

Silva, P. C., Meñez, E. G. & Moe, R. L. 1987. Catalog of the ben-

Lamouroux, J. V. F. 1816. Histoire des polypiers coral-

thic marine algae of the Philippines. Smithsonian Con-

ligènes flexibles, vulgairement nommés zoophytes. De

trib. Mar. Sci. 27:1-179.

l’imprimerie de F. Poisson, Caen, 560 pp.

Turner, D. 1808-1809. Fuci sive plantarum fucorum generi a

Land, L. S. 1970. Carbonate mud: production by epibiont

botanicis ascriptarum icones descriptiones et historia.

growth on Thalassia testudinum. J. Sediment. Petrol.

Fuci, or coloured figures and descriptions of the plants

40:1361-1363.

referrred by botanists to the genus Fucus, vol. 2. Typis J.

Leliaert, F., Vanreusel, W., De Clerck, O. & Coppejans, E. 2001.

M’Creery, impensis J. et A. Arch, London, 164 pp.

Epiphytes on the seagrasses of Zanzibar Island (Tanza-

Virnstein, R. W. & Cairns, K. D. 1986. Seagrass maps of the In-

nia), floristic and ecological aspects. Belg. J. Bot. 134:3-

dian River Lagoon: final report to DER, September 1986.

20.

Seagrass Ecosystems Analysts, Vero Beach, 27 pp.

Littler, D. S. & Littler, M. M. 2000. Caribbean reef plants. An

Won, B. Y., Cho, T. O. & Fredericq, S. 2009. Morphological and

identification guide to the reef plants of the Caribbean,

molecular characterization of species of the genus Cen-

Bahamas, Florida and Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Graph-

troceras (Ceramiaceae, Ceramiales), including two new

ics, Washington, 542 pp.

species. J. Phycol. 45:227-250.

Montagne, J. F. C. 1841. Plantae cellulares. In Barker-Webb, P.

Wulfen, F. X. 1803. Cryptogama aquatica. Arch. Bot. 3:1-64.

& Berthelot, S. (Eds.) Histoire Naturelle des Iles Canaries,

Wynne, M. J. 1985. Concerning the names Scagelia coral-

vol. 3. Béthune, Paris, pp. 161-208.

lina and Heterosiphonia wurdmannii (Ceramiales, Rho-

Penrose, D. & Chamberlain, Y. M. 1993. Hydrolithon farino-

dophyta). Cryptogam. Algol. 6:81-90.

sum (Lamouroux) comb. nov.: implications for generic

Zanardini, G. 1839. Sulle alghe. Lettera alla Direzione della

concepts in the Mastophoroideae (Corallinaceae, Rho-

Biblioteca Italiana. Bibl. Ital. 96:195-229.

dophyta). Phycologia 32:295-303.

153

http://e-algae.kr