Collocation, Collocation, Collocation: Discourse ... - York University

4 downloads 92 Views 220KB Size Report
Aug 6, 2008 - James A. Walker. University of New Mexico. York University [email protected] [email protected]. I. INTRODUCTION. - role of the lexicon in ...
13th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology

University of Leeds • August 6, 2008

Collocation, Collocation, Collocation: Discourse Formulas in Grammatical Variation Rena Torres Cacoullos University of New Mexico [email protected]

&

James A. Walker York University [email protected]

I. INTRODUCTION

-

Table 1: Factors contributing to the occurrence of singular agreement and there’s in plural existentials in Quebec City English.2

role of the lexicon in grammatical variation not well understood o low number of tokens o assumption of strict modularity between grammar and lexicon ‘lexicon’: conventionalized/routinized language units o lexical items o collocations of lexical and functional elements at the phrasal level types of evidence for lexical/collocational effects: o proportion of data (e.g., Poplack 1992) o differences in overall rate (e.g., Thompson & Mulac 1991) o differences in conditioning by language-internal factors

-

-

Total N: Input:

Tense Past Present

(2) (3) (4)

(5)

b. Singular agreement: But there was a lot of foxes. Present contracted: There’s two high schools. Presence of plural –s: But there was a hundred and some lakes up there. Phrasal extension beyond the NP: a. And there were guys that were there also. b. And there were just a few of us sent back, you see. c. There’s not that many places to hide. Presence of intervening material: Oh, I mean, yeah, there was always names.

there’s

946 .526

1,688 .438

.60 .18

[ ] [ ]

Range:

Plural -s Absent Present

42

.63 .37 Range:

II . PLURAL EXISTENTIALS

(1) a. Plural agreement: There were foxes around there.

SG AGR

Extension Adverbial None Clausal

(9:362) 1

26

.64 .53 .43 Range:

(9:361)

Intervening Material Present Absent

(72:006)

21

Range:

(26:943) (2:137) (54:26) (77:125)

[ ] [ ] [ ]

.64 .48

Type of Determiner “a” Quantifier Adjective Bare Negative Definite Number Other Quantifier

(43:427)

[ ] [ ]

16

[ [ [ [ [ [ [ Range:

.58 .49

] ] ] ] ] ] ]

9

.65 .55 .49 .48 .46 .39 .39 25

[ ] = not selected as significant 1

Examples are identified by speaker number and line number in the Quebec City component of the Quebec English corpus (Poplack, Walker & Malcolmson 2006).

2

Factor weights >.5 favour, factor weights