Commandeering and Constitutional Change Wesley J. Campbell ...

6 downloads 30 Views 1MB Size Report
ARTICLES. 1104. Commandeering and Constitutional Change. Wesley J. Campbell. 4. 1182. Parallel Exclusion. C. Scott Hemphill & Tim Wu. ESSAY. 1254 .
ARTICLES 1104

Commandeering and Constitutional Wesley J. Campbell 4

1182

Parallel Exclusion

Change

C. Scott Hemphill & Tim Wu ESSAY 1254

Reconceptualizing

the Burden of Proof

Edward K. Cheng NOTES 1280

Curing the Blind Spot in Administrative Law: A Federal Common Law Framework for State Agencies Implementing Cooperative Federalism Statutes Josh Bendor & Miles Farmer

1328

Mere Negligenee or Abandonment? Evaluating Claims of Attorney Misconduct After Maples v. Thomas Wendy Zorana Zupac

ARTICLE

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

1106

nal Change I. CONFEDERATION

urt's federalism revolution, Printz v. executive officers is "fundarnentally sovereignty." The Printz majority's ng-era perspectives. When Federalists . g the ratification debates, they were The Federalists capitulated to srates' . post taX because Hamilton, arnong commandeering state collectors. The of the Anti-Federalist agenda because uring greater local control over federal bureaucracy. These priorities carried among the most vehement defenders d judicial officers. Ironically, though sts who first planted the seeds of the vered sources and new interpretations, ing of Founding-era attitudes toward Article explains why early Congresses ustom combined with shifting political g consensus favoring commandeering's

IMPOST

DEBATES

A. The 1781 Impost Proposal B. The 1783 Compromise C. Defeat in New York

1112 1113 1117 1120

j

11. THE CONSTITUTION

1126

A. Ratification Debates B. The Oath Clause C. The Posse Comitatus 111. EARlY

CONGRESSIONAl

1127 1133 1139

PRACTICE

1144

A. Federalist Ambitions B.Virginia's Disqualifying Act C. Federal Use of State Officers D. A Judicial Response IV. COMMANDEERING

AND

CONSTITUTIONAL

1145 1153 1161 1166

CHANGE

es; former law clerk to the Honorable ersity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, llins, Peter Conti-Brown, Barbara Fried, ebosch, Mark Kelman, Larry Kramer, Seligman, Daniel Suhr, rhe members of rs of The Yale Laui Journal for helpful r also thanks the Filson Historical Society essed in this Article are, of course, the

1105