Comparing the Applicability of Complexity Measurements for Simulink ...

Comparing the Applicability of Complexity Measurements for Simulink Models during Integration Testing – An Industrial Case Study – Supplementary Material Jan Schroeder∗ , Christian Berger∗ , Thomas Herpel∗∗ and Miroslaw Staron∗ ∗ University

of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering {jan.schroder, christian.berger, miroslaw.staron}@gu.se ∗∗ Automotive Safety Technologies GmbH [email protected]

TABLE I T HE MEASUREMENT RESULTS (1). W ITH CU - CONTROL UNIT AND I1-I8 BEING THE EIGHT INTERVIEW PARTNERS . A CU’ S COMPLEXITY INCREASES WITH THE MEASURED VALUE IN ALL COLUMNS . T HE NORMALIZED VALUES RANGE FROM 0 TO 100 AND THE INTERVIEW RESULTS FROM 1 TO 6. CU CU1 CU2 CU3 CU4 CU5 CU6 CU7 CU8 CU9 CU10 CU11 CU12 CU13 CU14 CU15 CU16 CU17 CU18 CU19 CU20 CU21 CU22 CU23 CU24 CU25 CU26 CU27 CU28 CU29 CU30 CU31 CU32 CU33 CU34 CU35 CU36 CU37 CU38 CU39 CU40

measured results IOF BC kLOC 52.5 824 102.3 52.5 824 127.6 54.5 187 194.6 61.6 294 129.0 54.5 189 73.7 54.5 180 124.7 70.3 614 74.6 71.8 196 70.9 72.8 166 57.3 70.8 158 192.9 81.5 2128 170.9 116.3 1977 148.7 112.0 2228 146.4 116.3 2235 171.5 206.1 1925 116.0 154.4 979 85.9 154.4 1021 100.3 200.2 1995 130.1 200.7 1534 105.1 250.0 811 79.0 250.0 874 94.3 200.7 1576 119.8 194.3 837 146.6 200.0 1609 234.4 196.7 1615 165.9 185.8 772 101.0 185.8 772 125.8 180.1 637 137.7 268.7 3438 288.0 255.9 3130 234.4 483.7 4373 578.0 311.3 3672 650.7 483.7 5673 615.3 456.9 532 205.7 450.4 538 136.4 394.0 692 87.6 432.3 1091 104.3 429.1 1133 114.4 385.1 90 6.4 385.1 90 6.0

IOF 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 3 3 4 10 9 10 24 16 16 23 23 30 30 23 22 23 22 21 21 20 33 31 67 40 67 62 61 53 59 58 51 51

normalized BC LOC 9 15 9 19 1 29 2 19 1 10 1 18 6 11 1 10 1 8 1 29 25 26 23 22 26 22 26 26 22 17 11 12 11 15 23 19 17 15 9 11 9 14 18 18 9 22 18 35 18 25 8 15 8 19 7 20 40 44 37 35 52 89 43 100 67 95 5 31 5 20 7 13 12 15 13 17 0 0 0 0

I1

I2

3

2

3

4

2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

expert opinion I4 I5 I6 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 2 1 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4

I3 1 1

2 3 3 1 1 3 3 3

3 3 5 2 2

1

2 3

1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 5 5 5 4 4

3

3 3 2

I7

I8

TABLE II T HE MEASUREMENT RESULTS (2). W ITH CU - CONTROL UNIT AND I1-I8 BEING THE EIGHT INTERVIEW PARTNERS . A CU’ S COMPLEXITY INCREASES WITH THE MEASURED VALUE IN ALL COLUMNS . T HE NORMALIZED VALUES RANGE FROM 0 TO 100 AND THE INTERVIEW RESULTS FROM 1 TO 6. CU CU41 CU42 CU43 CU44 CU45 CU46 CU47 CU48 CU49 CU50 CU51 CU52 CU53 CU54 CU55 CU56 CU57 CU58 CU59 CU60 CU61 CU62 CU63 CU64 CU65 CU66 CU67 CU68 CU69 CU70 CU71 CU72 CU73 CU74 CU75 CU76 CU77 CU78

measured results IOF BC kLOC 592 200.5 5389 592 214.8 5454 562 70.9 206 565.5 131.3 393 189.8 72.5 590 189.8 78.3 618 146.3 135.6 123 275.8 220.1 1091 245.4 141.9 785 294.9 119.3 2248 294.9 128.1 2276 282.2 195.4 217 279.2 125.9 224 249.2 99.7 750 249.2 125.2 771 249.2 99.7 750 249.2 125.2 771 249.2 99.7 750 249.2 125.2 771 249.2 99.6 750 249.2 125.2 771 294.3 82.5 923 294.3 88.7 953 700.7 242.8 8357 683.3 258.7 8406 613.1 101.2 773 611.1 126.8 794 607 105.8 832 603.8 131.4 853 594 15.7 360 594 15.3 359 449.6 96 584 455.6 545.3 730 455.6 101.4 758 454.1 59.1 498 452.1 97.3 582 288 563.7 3442 161.4 183.3 1430

IOF 83 83 79 79 21 21 14 34 30 37 37 35 35 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 37 37 100 97 86 86 86 85 84 84 61 62 62 62 62 36 17

normalized LOC 64 65 1 4 6 6 0 12 8 26 26 2 2 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 99 100 8 8 9 9 3 3 6 8 8 5 6 40 16

BC 30 32 10 19 10 11 20 33 21 18 19 29 19 15 18 15 18 15 18 15 18 12 13 37 39 15 19 15 19 1 1 14 84 15 8 14 86 27

I1

I2 3 5 3

I3

expert opinion I4 I5 I6

I7

I8

1 1 1

2 2 2

2 2

4 4

1 1 1 2 2 5 5 2 2

1 1 2

3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3

2 2 4 4

1 1

3 2 1 1

3 4