Comparison between Metabolic Syndrome and

0 downloads 0 Views 162KB Size Report
Framingham risk score for female age score age score. 20-34. -9. 20-34. -7 ... 160-199. 4. 3. 2. 1. 1. 200-239. 7. 5. 3. 1. 0. 200-239. 8. 6. 4. 2. 1. 240-279. 9. 6. 4.
Comparison between Metabolic Syndrome and Framingham Risk Score as Predictor of Cardiovascular Diseases among Kazakhs in Xinjiang Wenwen Yang †, Rulin Ma †, Xianghui Zhang, Heng Guo, Jia He, Lei Mao, Lati Mu, Yunhua Hu, Yizhong Yan, Jiaming Liu , Jiaolong Ma, Shugang Li, Yusong Ding, Mei Zhang, Jingyu Zhang and Shuxia Guo* * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-180-0993-2625; Fax: +86-993-2057-153 † These authors contributed equally to this work.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Calculation of Framingham risk score: The risk score was calculated for each subject using the risk score of Wilson et al1. In this algorithm, subjects receive a point score based on categorical values of age, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, and smoking. The scoring sheet is available in the study by Wilson et al1. We calculated the risk score of each subjects. Supplemental Table S1: Framingham Risk Score Framingham risk score for male

Framingham risk score for female

age

score

age

score

20-34

-9

20-34

-7

35-39

-4

35-39

-3

40-44

0

40-44

0

45-49

3

45-49

3

50-54

6

50-54

6

55-59

8

55-59

8

60-64

10

60-64

10

65-69

11

65-69

12

70-74

12

70-74

14

75-79

13

75-79

16

score

score

age range

age range

TC

20-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

TC

20-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79