Composite Materials Journal of Thermoplastic

Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials http://jtc.sagepub.com/

Waste chestnut shell as a source of reinforcing fillers for polypropylene composites Alperen Kaymakci and Nadir Ayrilmis Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials published online 8 November 2012 DOI: 10.1177/0892705712461648 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jtc.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/05/0892705712461648

Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com

Additional services and information for Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jtc.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jtc.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

>> OnlineFirst Version of Record - Nov 8, 2012 What is This?

Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

Article

Waste chestnut shell as a source of reinforcing fillers for polypropylene composites

Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 1–11 ª The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0892705712461648 jtc.sagepub.com

Alperen Kaymakci1 and Nadir Ayrilmis2

Abstract In this study, we evaluated dimensional stability and some mechanical properties of polypropylene composites filled with chestnut shell flour (CSF). To meet this objective, CSF was compounded with polypropylene with and without coupling agent in a twin screw corotating extruder and then were manufactured by injection molding process. The thickness swelling and water absorption of the samples increased with increasing CSF content. The flexural and tensile modulus improved with increasing CSF content, while the flexural and tensile strengths of the samples decreased. The use of maleic anhydride polypropylene had a positive effect on the dimensional stability and mechanical properties of the polypropylene composites filled with CSF. This work showed that the composites treated with maleated polypropylene could be efficiently used as decking products, due to high-dimensional stability and satisfactory mechanical properties of the composites. Keywords Dimensional stability, chestnut shell, polypropylene, thermoplastic composite, mechanical properties

Introduction Instead of using inorganic fillers in the production of thermoplastic composites, natural fillers have been boosted to use in recent years due to the ecological concern,

1

Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey 2 Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Corresponding author: Alperen Kaymakci, Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Kastamonu University, 37000, Kastamonu, Turkey Email: [email protected]

1 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

2

Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials

environmental awareness and new rules and regulations, which require sustainability and ecoefficiency in technical applications. Lignocellulosic fillers are renewable and nonabrasive, have high specific properties, biodegradability, and can be incinerated for energy recovery.1 Furthermore, lignocellulosic filler-reinforced thermoplastic composites, upon correct design and manufacturing, can be competitive in both mechanical performance and price compared with inorganic filler-reinforced composites. In addition, the utilization of recycled plastic and natural filler in the production of such composites may help the environment by reducing the land filling and/or promoting the recycling. There have been many studies to obtain competitive results from natural fillers in the production of thermoplastic composites.2–10 Growing demand for reinforced thermoplastic composites has led to continuous efforts to find new resources as an alternative to wood. With increasing population of the world, the sustainable utilization of forest resources has been adversely influenced. One of these residuals is chestnut shell (CS), which is produced in high quantities in the chestnut candy industry. The sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) is a deciduous tree, widespread across Europe. Chestnut tree abundantly exists in the East Black Sea subsection, the Marmara region, and the Antalya coastal area via the West Anatolia subsection in Turkey.11 The leading chestnut-growing countries in the world are China, Korea, Italy, and Turkey. In autumn, it produces edible nuts that have been consumed for centuries. C. sativa is more commonly known as the sweet chestnut and is perhaps best known for its edible nuts. The nuts are used by confectioners, eaten roasted, and ground to make flour. It is originally native to the south-eastern Europe and Asia Minor, and a fully-grown tree has typically an impressive height of 20–35 m with a trunk of about 2 m in diameter.12 Utilization of chestnut wood in the production of wood-based panels such as particleboard and fiberboard and as a formaldehyde scavenger in the urea-formaldehyde resin was extensively investigated.13–18 In a previous study, it was reported that CS, as an alternative to wood material, can be successfully evaluated in the production of medium density fiberboard (MDF).19 However, the CS has not been studied as reinforcing filler in the production of polypropylene composite material. The objective of the present study was to investigate the use of waste CS generated in massive quantities by chestnut candy companies in the production of polypropylene composite material. To achieve this, dimensional stability and mechanical properties of the composites prepared from the CS flour (CSF) and polypropylene with and without maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) at 40, 50, and 60 wt% contents of the CSF were investigated.

Experimental Materials The CS was supplied from a commercial chestnut sweet manufacturer located in Nilufer, Bursa, Western Turkey. Prior to the use, the CS sample was dried in a laboratory oven at 60 C for 10 h to about moisture content of 20-30%. Following the drying, the CS was then processed by a rotary grinder without adding additional water. Finally, the CSF was passed through a US 35-mesh screen and was retained by a US 80-mesh screen. The CSF 2 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

Kaymakci and Ayrilmis

3

Figure 1. Chestnut shell flour (CSF).

(Figure 1) was then dried in a laboratory oven at 100 C for 24 h to a moisture content of 1%–2%. The polypropylene (melt flow index (MFI)/230 C/2.16 kg ¼ 5 g/10 min, density: 0.91 g/cm3, degree of crystallinity: 53%) produced by Petkim Petrochemical Corporation in Turkey was used as the polymeric material. The flexural modulus, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of the polypropylene were 1450, 35, and 1250 Mpa, respectively. The MAPP (Optim-425, MFI/190 C, 2.16 kg ¼ 120 g/10 min, density: 0.91 g/cm3) used as the coupling agent was supplied by Pluss Polymers Pvt. Ltd (India).

Manufacturing of lignocellulosic/polypropylene composite The CSF was dried to a moisture content of 1%–2% using an air dryer oven at 100 C for 24 h and then was stored in a polyethylene bag in an environmental controller. The CSF and polypropylene with and without the MAPP granulates were processed in a 30-mm conical corotating twin-screw extruder with a length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio of 30:1. The eight barrel temperature zones of the extruder were controlled at 175–190 C. The extruded strand passed through a water bath and was subsequently pelletized. These pellets were stored in a sealed container and then dried for about 3–4 h before being injection molded. The temperature used for injection molded samples was 180–190 C from feed zone to die zone. The extruded pellets were injected at injection pressure between 45 and 50 kg/m2 with a cooling time of about 30 s. Finally, the samples were conditioned 3 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

4


Table 1. The composition of polypropylene composites filled with chestnut shell flour Composite type CSF-1 CSF-2 CSF-3 CSF-4 CSF-5 CSF-6

Polypropylene (wt%)

CSF (wt%)

Compatibilizer MAPP (wt%)

60 50 40 57 47 37

40 50 60 40 50 60

0 0 0 3 3 3

CSF: chestnut shell flour; MAPP: maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene

at a temperature of 23 + 2 C and a relative humidity of 50 + 2% according to ASTM D 618-08. The raw material formulations used for the composites are presented in Table 1.

Determination of dimensional stability and mechanical properties The thickness swelling (TS) and water absorption (WA) tests were carried out according to ASTM D 570. The test samples were in the form of a disk of 50.8 mm in diameter and 3.2 mm in thickness. The conditioned samples were entirely immersed for 1 day and 7 and 28 days in a container of water at 23 + 2 C. At the end of each immersion time, the samples were taken out from the water and all the surface water was removed with a clean dry cloth. The samples were weighed to the nearest 0.01 g and measured to the nearest 0.001 mm immediately. Ten replicate samples were tested for each composite formulation. To evaluate the effect of MAPP coupling agent and filler loading on the mechanical properties of CS flour (CSF)-filled PP composites, testing of the flexural and tensile properties were determined in a climate-controlled testing laboratory. The flexural strength (MOR) and modulus (MOE) were conducted in accordance with ASTM D 790 using a Lloyd testing machine at a rate of 1.3 mm/min crosshead speed. The tensile tests were conducted according to ASTM D 683. Tests were performed at a rate of 5 mm/min. Ten samples were tested for the tensile and flexural properties of each composite formulation.

Statistical analysis The analysis of variance was conducted (p < 0.01) to evaluate the effect of the CSF content on the dimensional stability and mechanical properties of the composites. Significant differences among the average values of the composite types were determined using Duncan’s multiple range test.

Results and discussion Dimensional stability Air-dry density, TS, and WA of the polypropylene composites with and without the CSF are presented in Table 2. The air-dry density of the composites ranged from 0.99 to 1.03 g/cm3. The TS and WA values of the samples significantly increased with 4 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

5

Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

0.99 (0.02) 1.01 (0.02) 1.02 (0.02) 1.01 (0.02) 1.02 (0.02) 1.03 (0.01)

Density (g/cm3) 7 days 1.38 (0.04)c 1.72 (0.15)de 1.89 (0.13)e 1.23 (0.08)c 1.52 (0.55)cd 1.71 (0.19)de

1 day 0.61 (0.04)c 0.77 (0.03)de 0.82 (0.06)e 0.58 (0.03)c 0.73 (0.06)d 0.77 (0.05)de

1.88 (0.17)cd 2.20 (0.20)ef 2.50 (0.21)g 1.69 (0.04)c 2.07 (0.25)de 2.36 (0.21)fg

28 days 0.30 (0.03)c 0.37 (0.02)d 0.42 (0.02)e 0.27 (0.03)c 0.36 (0.03)d 0.39 (0.03)de

1 day

0.66 (0.08)c 0.75 (0.06)de 0.91 (0.06)f 0.50 (0.03)g 0.67 (0.05)cd 0.82 (0.13)ef

7 days

Water absorption (%)

0.88 (0.13)cd 1.06 (0.18)ef 1.29 (0.09)g 0.74 (0.07)c 0.92 (0.14)de 1.13 (0.18)f

28 days

CSF: chestnut shell flour. a Groups with same superscript letters in a column indicate that there is no statistical difference (p < 0.01) between the samples according to Duncan’s multiple range test. The values in the parentheses indicate SDs. b See Table 1 for composite formulation.

CSF-1 CSF-2 CSF-3 CSF-4 CSF-5 CSF-6

Composite typeb

Thickness swelling (%)

Physical properties

Table 2. Physical properties of the polypropylene composites filled with CSFa

6


Figure 2. Thickness swelling of the thermoplastic composite specimens as a function of chestnut shell flour content (see Table 1 for samples codes).

increasing CSF content (Figures 2 and 3). The sample types showing significant differences with other groups according to Duncan’s multiple-range tests are shown by superscript letters in Table 2. The lowest TS value was found to be 0.61% for the samples containing 40 wt% CSF after 1 day of submersion in water, whereas the highest TS value was found to be 2.50% for the samples containing 60% CSF and MAPP after 28 day of submersion in water. The TS values for the 1 day water-immersed sample ranged from 0.61% to 0.82% for uncoupled samples and 0.58% to 0.77% for coupled samples. These values increased after 28 days of immersion, varying from 1.88% to 2.50% for the uncoupled samples and 1.69% to 2.36% for coupled samples. The samples with a low content of CSF and a high content of plastic had lower TS and WA values, as expected (Figures 2 and 3). This is true both for the composites made with and without MAPP. The WA increased with increasing CSF content in the composites – a trend that is true for 1 day and 7 and 28 days water immersion tests. With the increase in the CSF content, there are more water residence sites, thus more water is absorbed. On the other hand, the composites containing a high content of polypropylene have less WA sites and thus lower WA.20 The lowest WA value (0.30%) was found for the samples containing 40 wt% CSF after 1 day submersion in water, whereas the highest WA value (1.29%) was found for the samples containing 60 wt% CSF after 28 days of submersion in water. The samples made with lower content of the CSF had lower TS. This is true both for the composites made with and without MAPP. The WA values of the samples were significantly improved by adding the 3 wt% the MAPP. Significant differences (p < 0.01) between some group averages for the TS and 6 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014


7

Figure 3. Water absorption of the thermoplastic composite specimens as a function of chestnut shell flour content.

WA values are shown in Table 2. The polypropylene composites modified with the MAPP had higher density and lower porosity, and thus had better dispersion and interfacial strength when compared with the composites without the MAPP.20 This behavior can be attributed to the reaction of the hydrophilic –OH groups of the filler and the acid anhydride groups of the MAPP, thus forming ester linkages, as it has been proposed in the literature.21,22 However, the samples with MAPP showed that TS is reduced at the same CSF content. For example, at the constant content of the CSF (60 wt%), the WA values of the samples after water immersion for 28 days decreased from 1.29% to 1.13%, when the MAPP was incorporated into the samples. The MAPP improves the interfacial adhesion between CSF and polymer matrix, leading to less microvoids and fiber-polypropylene debondings in the interphase region. Due to the presence of polar hydroxyl groups in the CSF, the moisture absorption is high, which leads to weak interfacial adhesion between the fibers and the hydrophobic polymer matrix, which makes debonding. The chemical reaction (ester linkages) between the polypropylene and CSF reduced the number of available hydrophilic groups.

Flexural properties The flexural strength and modulus values of the CSF-filled polypropylene composites are presented in Table 3. Statistical analysis found some significant differences 7 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

8


Table 3. Mechanical properties of the polypropylene composites filled with CSFa Mechanical properties Composite typeb CSF-1 CSF-2 CSF-3 CSF-4 CSF-5 CSF-6

Flexural strength (MPa) 37.6 (1.9)c 35.7 (1.6)c 30.6 (5.1)d 41.2 (1.8)e 37.4 (2.0)c 34.0 (2.0)c

Flexural modulus (MPa) 3454 3637 3810 3834 4009 4319

(316)c (236)cd (129)de (289)de (160)e (156)f

Tensile strength (MPa) 13.7 16.5 14.4 21.8 22.7 19.2

(3.0)c (3.7)d (07)e (3.6)d (1.7)de (1.4)e

Tensile modulus (MPa) 2868 3535 4106 3592 3993 4216

(787)c (583)cd (242)c (286)ef (356)f (230)de

CSF: chestnut shell flour. a Groups with same superscript letters in a column indicate that there is no statistical difference (p < 0.01) between the samples according to Duncan’s multiple range test. The values in the parentheses are SDs. b See Table 1 for composition formulation.

(p < 0.01) between some group means for the MOR and MOE values. Significant differences between composite types are shown in Table 3. As the CSF loading increased, the flexural strength values of the polypropylene composites with and without MAPP decreased. The flexural modulus of the samples increased by 10% as the CSF increased from 40 to 60 wt%, where the flexural strength decreased by 19%. The degree of crystallinity of polypropylene fiber is generally between 50% and 60%18 (53% for the polypropylene used in the present study) and between 60% and 70%19 for cellulose. Due to higher crystallinity of cellulose, it is stiffer than polypropylene.23 The increase in the modulus suggests an efficient stress transfer between the polymer and filler. The reduction in the flexural strength of the samples due to increasing CSF content was mainly attributed to the poor compatibility between polar CSF and polypropylene, which forms weak interfacial regions. Another reason for the reduction in the flexural strength was decrement in the amount of binding between plastics and lignocellulosic fibers, since fiber content increases and the amount of plastic decreases. Similar findings were reported in previous studies.2,23–25 The composites with the MAPP showed higher mechanical properties compared with the composites without the MAPP. For example, at the constant content of CSF (40 wt%), the flexural strength and modulus of the samples increased by 9% and 10% when the MAPP was incorporated into the samples. Because The MAPP reduces the voids sizes and turns the surface more homogeneous confirming its effect on promoting adhesion in the interfacial region. The improvement in the interfacial adhesion and enhanced stress transfer from the polymer matrix to the stiffer CSF caused a significant increase in the flexural strength and modulus of the samples. Similar results were also reported in the flexural strength of wood flour filled thermoplastic composites.2,20,26,27 All the polypropylene composites filled with CSF showed higher flexural modulus than the neat polypropylene, which was 1450 MPa. When compared with the neat polypropylene, the flexural modulus was increased by 197% by adding 60 wt% CSF to 8 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014


9

the polypropylene. In addition for polyolefin-based plastic lumber decking boards, ASTM D 6662 standard requires the minimum flexural strength of 6.9 MPa. All the composites produced in this study provided flexural strength values (13–25 MPa) that are well over the requirement by the standard.

Tensile properties The results of the tensile strength and modulus of the CSF-filled samples with and without MAPP are presented in Table 3. The results of the tensile modulus test were similar to the results of the flexural modulus test; the composites with high CSF content and treated with the MAPP had better flexural modulus than the untreated ones. All the polypropylene composites filled with CSF flour showed higher bending modulus than the neat polypropylene, which was 1250 MPa. When compared with the neat polypropylene, the tensile modulus was increased by 238% by adding 60 wt% CSF flour to the polypropylene. The tensile strength of the samples increased from 13.7 to 16.5 MPa as the CSF increased from 40 to 50 wt%, whereas further increment (60 wt%) increased the flexural strength to 14.4 MPa. This result was consistent with the results of previous studies.25–28 For example, in a previous study,26 it was observed a similar trend with wood flour-filled polypropylene composites. They also reported that dissimilarities between polar wood flour and nonpolar polymer matrix caused poor adhesion and resulted in lower tensile strength. Poor dispersion of the fillers in the polymer matrix could be another reason for lower tensile strength for the samples with a high content of the CSF. Since there was not good bonding between the CSF and polymer matrix, test samples were broken at lower loads. Tensile modulus of the polymer-composites was significantly enhanced when the amount of CSF in the polymer matrix was increased to 60 wt%. This improvement was mainly due to the fact that lignocellulosic materials have higher modulus than polypropylene.25,27,28 This is one of the advantages of the use of lignocellulosic fillers in the thermoplastics. In some applications, certain modulus values were desired and could not be provided by polymer by itself.26 The effect of the MAPP addition was significantly more pronounced for the flexural strength than for the flexural modulus. For example, at the constant content of the CSF flour (60 wt%), the incorporation of 3 wt% MAPP coupling agent to the samples showed an increase in the tensile strength and modulus by 33% and 3%, respectively.

Conclusions The results of this study showed that the CSF was capable of serving as new reinforcing filler in the manufacturing of polypropylene composite materials, which reduced cost and environmental benefits. The TS and WA values of the samples increased with increasing CSF content. In general, the flexural and tensile strengths of the composites decreased with the increasing CSF flour content. The flexural and tensile modulus improved with increasing CSF content. Adding the MAPP significantly improved the dimensional stability and mechanical properties of the samples. The test results showed 9 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014

10


that the CSF could be efficiently used as reinforcing filler for polypropylene composites with MAPP used for decking products, due to high dimensional stability and satisfactory mechanical properties of the composites. Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. References 1. Bledzki AK and Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 1999; 24: 221. 2. Ayrilmis N, Buyuksari U, and Dundar T. Waste pine cones as a source of reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. J Appl Polym Sci 2010; 117: 2324–2330. 3. Fabiyi JS and McDonald AG. Effect of wood species on property and weathering performance of wood plastic composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 2010; 41: 1434–1440. 4. Ayrilmis N, Jarusombuti S, Fueangvivat V, and Bauchongkol P. Effect of thermal-treatment of wood fibres on properties of flat-pressed wood plastic composites. Polym Degrad Stabil 2011; 96(5): 818–822. 5. Ayrilmis N, Benthien JT, and Thoemen H. Effects of formulation variables on surface properties of wood plastic composites. Compos B: Eng 2012; 43(2): 325–331. 6. Bouafif H, Koubaa A, Perre´ P, and Cloutier A. Effects of fiber characteristics on the physical and mechanical properties of wood plastic composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40(12): 1975–1981. 7. Kurt R and Mengeloglu F. Utilization of boron compounds as synergists with ammonium polyphosphate for flame retardant wood-polymer composites. Turk J Agric For 2011; 35: 155–163. 8. Migneaulta S, Koubaa A, Erchiqui F, Chaala A, Englund K, and Wolcott MP. Effects of processing method and fiber size on the structure and properties of wood–plastic composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40(1): 80–85. 9. Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y, and Xu Y. Rice straw fiber-reinforced high-density polyethylene composite: effect of fiber type and loading. Ind Crop Prod 2008; 28(1): 63–72. 10. Panthapulakkal S, Zereshkian A, and Sain M. Preparation and characterization of wheat straw fibers for reinforcing application in injection molded thermoplastic composites. Biores Tech 2006; 97(2): 265–272. 11. Ertan E, Seferoglu G, Dalkılıc GG, and Tekintas FE. Selection of chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.) grown in Nazilli district, Turkey. Turk J Agric For 2007; 31: 115–123. 12. Sweet chestnut Castanea sativa. http://apps.kew.org/trees/?page_id¼85 (Accessed 2 May 2012). ´ lvarez JG. DSC and DMA study of 13. Va´zquez G, Santos JM, Freire MS, Antorrena G, and A chestnut shell tannins for their application as wood adhesives without formaldehyde emission. J Ther Anal Calori 2012; 108: 605–611. 14. Trosa A and Pizzi A. Industrial hardboard and other panels binder from waste lignocellulosic liquors/phenol-formaldehyde resins. Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 1998; 56: 229–233. 15. Fonti P, Bra¨ker OU, and Giudici F. Relationship between ring shake incidence and earlywood vessel characteristics in chestnut wood. IAWA 2002; 23(3): 287–298. 16. Barboutis I. Bending strength of the finger jointed chestnut wood. In: Proceedings of 3rd European Conference on Hardwood. Hardwood Research and Utilization in Europe: The 10 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014


17.

18. 19. 20.

21. 22. 23.

24.

25.

26. 27.

28.

11

beauty of hardwood, Edited by Bejo L. Sopron, Hungary, Faculty of Wood Sciences, University of West Hungary, 3-4 September 2007, pp. 5–11. Lourenc¸o PB, Feio AO, and Machado JS. Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: Non-destructive correlations for test results in new and old wood. Construct Build Mater 2007; 21: 1617–1627. Koukos PK. Some physical properties of sweet chestnut wood grown in Greece. Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 1997; 55: 127–129. Ayrilmis N and Kaymakci A. Reduction of formaldehyde emission from light MDF panels by adding chestnut shell flour. Holzforschung 2012; 66: 443–446. Adhikary KB, Pang S, and Staiger MP. Dimensional stability and mechanical behaviour of wood–plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Compos B 2008; 39: 807–815. Sharan A. Strength characteristics of fibre reinforced compacted pond ash. MSc Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2011. McKeown JJ and Lyness WI. Evidence for retention of the crystalline-amorphous ratio of cellulose during heterogeneous acid hydrolysis. J Polym Sci 1960; 47: 9–17. Yuan Q, Wu D, Gotama J, and Bateman S. Wood fiber reinforced polyethylene and polypropylene composites with high modulus and ımpact strength. J Thermoplast Compos. 2008; 21: 195–208. Li Q and Matuana LM Effectiveness of maleated and acrylic acid-functionalized polyolefin coupling agents for HDPE-wood-flour composites. J Thermoplast Compos 2003; 16: 551–564. Cavdar AD, Kalaycioglu H, and Mengeloglu F. Tea mill waste fibers filled thermoplastic composites: the effects of plastic type and fiber loading. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2011; 30(10): 833–844 Mengeloglu F and Karakus K. Thermal degradation, mechanical properties and morphology of wheat straw flour filled recycled thermoplastic composites. Sensors 2008; 8: 500–519. Tajan M, Chaıwutthınan P, and Leejarkpai T. Thermal and mechanical properties of woodplastic composites from iron wood flour and recycled polypropylene foam. J Metal Mater Miner 2008; 18(2): 53–56. Bhaskar J, Haq S, and Yadaw SB. Evaluation and testing of mechanical properties of wood plastic composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2011; 25: 391–401.

11 Downloaded from jtc.sagepub.com at Istanbul Universitesi on April 23, 2014