Nov 12, 1985 - WIGTON. AJR:147,. September. 1986. TABLE. 3: Database. Costs. --âIncludes telecommunications charge. b Computer and modem pnces vary ...
641
Computerized Literature Jud
W. Gurney1
and
Reference Robert
Management:
Searching
the
S. Wigton2
With the addition of more than 225,000 articles yearly to the medical literature, it becomes increasingly difficult for the practicing radiologist to keep abreast of medical knowledge. This problem is not limited to radiology. Over one-third of recently surveyed internists and otolaryngologists expressed dissatisfaction with their ability to keep up with new developments [1 1. Personally searching a topic through volumes of!ndex Medicus is frustrating and time consuming. Searches performed by medical librarians can be very expensive and may take several days to complete, limiting their use to the most important problems. To help in gathering pertinent medical literature, one academic Radiology Department has developed a comprehensive information service using a clinical medical librarian [2]. A similar project proved successful in a Department of Medicine [3]. However, most academic departments and private physiclans do not have the funds to support such an undertaking. The introduction of the personal computer has revolutionized access to the scientific literature, making individualized computer searches in the office or at home possible and less expensive than a medical librarian’s. With a small amount of time and effort, a radiologist can learn the techniques of computerized bibliographic retrieval. Database services, both public and private, provide access to the world’s medical literature. These services differ in ease of use, cost, and capability of extracting the desired information.
Medicus. Citations are printed in Index Medicus under one to three headings but may be listed under 20 on-line. MEDLINE citations may be located by language, geographic area, or a word that appears in the title or abstract; Index Medicus does not have this capability. References are available on-line weeks before they are printed in Index Medicus. Quick reading of an abstract often will identify articles worth pursuing, and abstracts may be withdrawn from the majority of articles accessed in MEDLINE. When using Index Medicus, the researcher must pull and scan each article. While Index Medicus is usually located only in medical libraries, computerized
Lung
(16 In
Lung
major 5,
MeSH
headiri
identified
fltl(t.it((ItS’.)
diseases
Pulmonary
eosinophdia
Pulmonary
fibrosis
Lung
Initial
deposition
alveolar
Lung
level.
pattern Brody
abnormalities
of
AR,
inhaled et
minerals al.
Ann
(fn to
Index
2h
and
NY
consequent
‘scam
\lcdic’is. subheadings
pathogenic
Sci l9Sh428:lOS-2O
each in
MeSH which
heading citations
events
(32
at
the
ref.)
nay
have
are
listed.)
up
Analysis
Bibliographic
Searching Anatomy
The most important medical database is MEDLINE, the computerized counterpart oflndex Medicus. MEDLINE is one of several databases compiled by the National Library of Medicine in a database service known as MEDLARS (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System). MEDLINE contains over 4 million references from more than 3200 journals, divided into back files covering 1966 to the present. The literature may be searched by hand with Index Medicus or by computer with MEDLINE, but the contrast is striking. More search terms are available on-line than through Index
lilt
Lung
and
Histology
rastricture
diseases
Fig. 1 -Bibliographic search on pulmonary processes that predominate in upper lobes of the lung. For the year 1984, 52 pages were reviewed induding 16 major MeSH headings previously loentified in theAnnotated MeSH. Over 4500 citations were scanned, 32 were noted as possibly relevant. Total search time exceeded 1 hr. the
Received November 12, 1985; accepted after revision April 9, 1986. I Department of Radiology. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Medical Complex, 8700 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, requests to J. W. Gurney. 2 Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 42nd and Dewey. Omaha. NB 68105. AJR
147:641-445,
September
1986
0361-803X/86/1472-0641
C American
Roentgen
Ray Society
WI 53226. Address reprint
/10gm
PLEASE
ENTER
Hello
from
the
Retrieval 55
USERID/PASSWORt)
National
OR
Library
of
(search
statement
LOGON
Medicine’s
ELHILL
System
1/C?
I)
USER: file
(connect
medline
to
MEDLINE
current
file
198.’
PROG: YOU
ARE
55
NOW
CONNECTED
TO
THE
MEDLINE
FILE
2/C
USER: lung
cup L::r
dise:sc’s
‘‘xp!ode
instructs
with
all the
(4568)
(4568
Oiseus
more
the
computer
specific
MeSH
in
MEDLINE
to gather headings
together related
the to
MeSH
lung
heading
diseases)
PROG: SS (2) PSTG
SS
postings
concerning
lung
diseases)
3/C?
USER: (tw)
upper
and
abstracts
that
lobe
tw:tcxt
contain
.k-sstructs
v
both
the
words
the upper
and
computer
to
fin
those
tLtlcs
and
bc
PROG: SS (3) PSTG
55
(154)
(184
articles
contain
both
the
words
upper
and lobe
in title
or abstract)
proportion
4/C?
USER
3
2 AND PROG: 55
(4)
text
PSTG
(49)
words
(49
upper
and
articles
contain
both
the
concept
of
lung
diseases
and
the
results
of
lobe)
SS 5/C? USER: 4 and
not
for
(Ia)
(eliminates
foreign
language
articles)
PROG: 55 (5)
searches may be performed anywhere that is equipped with a microcomputer and the appropriate modem and software. Searches on MEDLINE can be intricately constructed and tailored by author’s name, journal of publication, a word in the title, or one or a combination of 1 4,000 medical subject headings (MeSH terms) used by the National Library of Medicine in indexing and cataloging materials. A useful tool when planning a search strategy, MeSH is a thesaurus of terms used in indexing and analyzing the literature. Several books published by the National Library of Medicine arrange MeSH headings in different sequences convenient for searching. Annotated MeSH is an alphabetical list of MeSH headings, each of which provides information and history on its use, cross-references to other MeSH headings, and synonyms that may lead to preferred terms. Permuted MeSH takes each significant word that appears in every MeSH heading and lists all associated MeSH headings in which that word appears. It is useful in researching topics not covered in a single MeSH heading. A topic such as “solitary pulmonary nodule,” when examined in Permuted MeSH under “pulmonary,” cross-references to “coin lesion, pulmonary,” a related heading but one that might be missed in the alphabetical list. Related headings that may be more appropriate for searching are found in this manner. Tree Structures is a list of MeSH headings categorized by subject and arranged in hierarchial fashion from general to specific. A search may be narrowed down to a more precise MeSH heading, providing a higher
PSTG
(42)
(42
articles
identified
with
insrurts
the
all
the
above
criteria)
of relevant
articles
for retrieval.
To find references to a particular clinical problem, one would consult the MeSH manuals to identify pertinent headings and then review monthly and yearly volumes of Index Medicus through the desired time span for each of these headings (Fig. 1). Although there is no fee for this method, the search is tedious, especially if searching is performed over many years and volumes. For several years, Radiology has published a “Cumulative Index,” cataloging articles from many of the major radiologic journals. Fewer terms are used in coding than in MeSH headings, and they are not organized in a stratified manner. While the “Cumulative Index” is easy to use and provides a quick reference to the radiology journals, research of a topic that spans other journals requires use of Index Medicus or computerized searches of MEDLINE.
55 6/C?
Computerized
USER: prt
compr
search.
(7r)nt Co’nprcssci
compressed causes
multiple
data
computer
elements
to print
to
begin on one
printing line
saving
paper.)
PROG:
AU
.
cavity SO
-
Israel
PH;Poe
lung
disease.
?espiratixx
RH;Greenblatt
?S5:h7
‘?):
DW;Swalbach
WG
I 51-7
Fig. 2.-MEDLARS’ search to find recent literature on lung diseases in upper lobes. Performed by a medical librarian, search cost $1 7 with turnaround time of 28 hr. Same search on a home microcomputer took 15 mm, cost $4.50, and was downloaded into a database manager for storage. Parenthetic statements give brief description of commands and output from MEDLARS’ search. User input is in lower-case type.
Retrieval
Until recently, only librarians and specialists with extensive training performed on-line bibliographic searching. Now, using a computer terminal, a modem, a telephone, and a password, a radiologist can have access to a wealth of information. The process of searching is simple. After connecting on-line to a database, the user conducts a dialog with the computer by typing in successive queries until the needed references are identified. The typical search requires 1 0-1 5 mm; results can then be printed or stored on magnetic tape or disk (downloaded) for later use. MEDLINE may be accessed directly through the National Library of Medicine using MEDLARS (Fig. 2). Completion of a 1-day training course, offered throughout the United States, is required before one can use the MEDLARS system. A modest investment in searching manuals is also necessary to use MEDLARS fully. The least expensive technique for on-
AJR:147,
COMPUTERIZED
September1986
TABLE
1 : Interface
Programs
for Medical
Title
GRATEFUL
LITERATURE
Literature
MEDLARS National
Management Library
System
Section
of Medicine
(301)
double-density
disk drive
Informa-
Apple ][+ with CP/M 2.2 (56K) and two floppy disk drives, or IBM PC (or compatible)
City Science Center
Philadelphia, PA 19104 (800) 523-4092 Menlo Corporation 4633 Old Ironsides, Suite Santa Clara, CA 95050 (408) 986-0200
“SeeWton
with 256K
496-6193
151 Institute for Scientific tion 3501 Market St.
University
Pro-Search’
Requirements
IBM PC (or compatible)
RAM and one double-sided
Bldg. 38A, Am. 4n421 Bethesda, MD 20894 Universal
643
Searches
Address
MED
Sci-Mate: Online Searchera
SEARCH
400
IBM PC (or compatible) RAM
with 256K
151.
bWt(6l
TABLE
2: Database
National
Library
Services
of Medicine
(NLM)
MEDLARS Management Section National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, (301)
MD 496-6193
Bibliographic BRKTHRU BAS After
20209
Retrieval Services (BRS) Database
Latham, NY 12110 - 2 - ASK BRS Information Services, Dialog (800) DIALOG
Inc.
Knowledge Index 3460 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 334-2564
PaperChase Beth Israel Hospital 330 Brookline Avenue Boston, MA 02215 (61 7) 735-2253
AMA/GTE Medical Information Network (MINET) GTE Telenet Medical Information Network 8229 Boone Blvd. Vienna, VA 22180 (703) S
Vendors
Dark
BAS/Colleague 1200 Route 7
(800)
nects to the library’s computer, performs the search, and downloads the results. Off-line, the user assesses retrieved citations for appropriateness. GRATEFUL MED then analyzes the articles judged to be relevant and nonrelevant and suggests MeSH headings that may be useful in further search.
442-2500
Not mentned
in text. Contact GTE for further information.
line bibliographic retrieval, MEDLARS provides the capability to perform the most sophisticated of searches, tailored to individual needs. For the occasional searcher who may not be interested in learning the complexities of the MEDLARS system, the National Library of Medicine has recently offered a user-friendly software package named GRATEFUL MED (Table 1), designed to simplify the search process. The user constructs a search off-line and then connects to the on-line service by filling out a series of screen menus. The software then con-
MEDLINE may also be accessed by one of the commercial database services, such as DIALOG or Bibliographic Retrieval Services (BRS), which lease MEDLINE from the National Ubrary of Medicine. A subscription to these services (Tables 2 and 3) offers an alternative to the use of MEDLARS. These vendors, though somewhat more expensive, offer several advantages. First, they provide access to a wide number of databases. DIALOG, for example, offers more than 200, including additional medical databases such as Biosis Previews, Embase (Excerpta Medica), and Sci-Search, as well as databases covering business, basic sciences, law, and so on. A radiologic user may wish to access these other databases for topics such as physics, computer imaging, or education [4]. A second advantage of a database service is that the vendor provides searching commands and menus that are not only easier to use than those of the individual database, but are similar across all of the databases offered; once the commands for one database are learned, there should be no trouble with the others. The disadvantage of these “userfriendly” commands is the lack of flexibility in planning and performing searches. In general, reference retrieval is less comprehensive and specific than in literature searches using the direct access of MEDLINE from MEDLARS (Fig. 3). A third advantage is the expanding variety of new offerings in addition to bibliographic databases. BRS/Colleague, for example, offers several full-text journals and textbooks online. The entire contents ofjournals such as Annals of Internal Medicine can be searched through this service. At present, graphs and photographs are not retrievable, although it is possible that this material will also be transmissable soon.
644
GURNEY
TABLE
3:
AND
Costs
Database
Cost”
PLEASE
Number of Databases
Start5 F ee
Monthly
Mus.
$22 $15
0
0
$15 $32 $20 $22
Night
After Darkd BAKTHAU Day Night DIALOG
Knowledge
Indexd
MEDII
? FIND
LUNG
manuals)
$44
0
$28 $36
0
$75 $75
66 79
?FIND
$24
0
$35
Day
$23”
0
0
Night
$22
to
MEDLINE
current
file
195
(1444
articls
dcntlicd
usng
the
identifier
lung
disease)
UPPER UPPER
41
AND
51
6117
220 ?FIND
53
UPPEP
(fri
setl
and
text
word
upper
LOBE LOBE
52
AND
NOT
LOBE
LA=NONENGLISH
31 54
421062
1
C
I
0.10/reference
displayed, 0.10/search
LANONENGLISH
1 1 53 DISPLAY
displayed. 0.1 0/abstract
DISEASE
13745
13
manuals)
Includes telecommunications charge. Computer and modem pnces vary, systems range from $500-SOon. Includes 14 full-text journals and 35 full-text books.
b
LUNG
52 AND 53
0 ($50,
INDEX connect
Sb AND 52
$1 2
KNOWLEDGE
DISEASE
1444
?FIND
PaperChase
--“
TO
?BEGIN
6C
$125 ($50,
Day
10
1986
September
LOGON:
St
BRS /Colleague
AJR:147,
WELCOME
NLM Day Night
WIGTON
NOT
LANONENGLISH
54/SI/I-I
I (print
4th
changing
spectrum
of
set
foreign
(eliminate in
medium
format,
language articics
articlcs)
1-
1)
4/41/I
The
statement.
cystic
pulmonary
lesions
requiring
surgical
resection
in
infants. Schneider
New Methods
of Access
Department 3
Even with the standardized and easier-search languages, many users find the database services too difficult and too expensive. Two new types of products have appeared to address these problems: new on-line services and intelligent interface programs for the personal computer. Bibliographic
Retrieval
Services
offers
BRS/Colleague,
is using
an intelligent
interface
program
with
the personal
computer (Table 1 ). These programs, such as Pro-Search and Sci-Mate, not only take over the chores of gaffing connected to the on-line service, they also translate search requests into the special command language of the on-line service. The Sci-Mate Universal Online Searcher is a product of the Institute for Scientific Information, the producers of Current Contents and Science Citation Index. Sci-Mate offers a series of menu choices by which one can set up search strategies. Pro-Search
(previously
In-Search)
facilitates
searching
of
Tcr3c
rardiovisc
Journal
Code:
Cyr
JA;Thompson
Surgery,
University 5cr
(UNITED
TR:Sohnson of
DE;Burke
‘tinnesota
STATES),
BAtFoker
Hospitals, Mar
1985,
IE.
Minneapolis. 39
(3)
p332-9,ISSN
0022-
K93
an
on-line system with on-screen menus that requires far less training to get started and is excellent for the occasional user. A similar offering from DIALOG is Knowledge Index. Like Colleague, Knowledge Index is an on-line service that is easier to learn and use. For those concerned with the high price of searching, BRS offers BRS After Dark, which provides searching during off hours for substantially lower prices than daytime search. Another approach in easing access to the computer services
-5223
IR;St.
of
either Bibliographic Retrieval Services or DIALOG databases. Pro-Search users can call up comprehensive information about the organization, contents, and special features of each of the databases. Both programs save money by allowing one to prepare a search strategy before going on-line, both have facilities for downloading selected references to disk,
Fig. 3.-MEDLARS’ example from Fig. 2 was searched using MEDLINE database through Knowledge Index. Familiar English commands should be compared to commands from MEDLARS. Searching strategy is less inclusive than through MEDLARS. Eleven articles were identified, compared to 42 by MEDLARS. Search was completed in 18 mm and cost $6.89. User input is indicated by lines beginning with a question mark.
and both provide automatic dial-up and connection to the database. Several institutions have developed their own in-house searching capabilities by obtaining tapes of the MEDLINE database and loading them in their own systems. The most successful has been PaperChase, developed at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital and now offered as a nationwide on-line service [7, 8]. Easy for the novice user, it offers some unique features such as the ability to restrict search results to the journals shelved in the local library. With the development of newer high-capacity data-storage media, such as the laser disk, searching locally held subsets of the MEDLINE database may soon become a popular alternative to on-line searching [9]. For each physician, the best system for access to the literature will be determined by anticipated frequency of use, cost, and individual needs. A recent study evaluating routes to the MEDLINE files found all systems capable of retrieving the pertinent articles addressing a given clinical problem
AJR:147,
September
COMPUTERIZED
1986
LITERATURE
[1 0]. As might be anticipated, differences existed in ease of use, cost, searching time, and the proportion of articles relevant to the topic. Keeping abreast of medical literature is a difficult task, but computerized searching makes it easier by allowing the individual radiologist easy rapid access to the databases.
REFERENCES
1 . Singer J, Sacks HS, Lucente F, Chalmers TC. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. JAMA
1983:249:1610-1614 2. Ekstrand NL, Maynard mation
service
for
1983;1 41:1077-1080
CD, Sprinkle MD. A comprehensive an
academic
radiology
department.
inforAJR
3.
Miller
645
SEARCH
N, Kaye
D. The experience
of a department
of medicine
with a clinical medical library service. J Med Ed 1985;60:367373 4. Rowberg AH, Newell JD, Hunter TB. Telecomputing in radiology. AJR 1985;145:411-413 5. Wigton AS. Review of Sci-Mate Universal Online Searcher. Ann Intern Med 1984;100:621-622 6. Wigton AS. Review of In-Search. Ann Intern Med 1985;102: 566567 7. Horowitz GL, Bleich HL. Paperchase: a computer program to search the medical literature. N Engi J Med 1981;305:924-930 8. Horowitz GL, Jackson JD, Bleich HL. Paperchase self-service bibliographic retrieval. JAMA 1983;250:2494-2499 9. Crecine JP. The next generation of personal computers. Science
1986;231 :935-942 1 0. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, et al. Computer searching of the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 1985;1 03:812-816