Crop-weed interactions in short rotation coppice willow

2 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Crop-weed interactions in short rotation coppice willow. Monika Welc, Anneli Lundkvist, Theo Verwijst. April 2 - 5, 2017 Nyon, Switzerland. Joint workshop of the ...
Crop-weed interactions in short rotation coppice willow Monika Welc, Anneli Lundkvist, Theo Verwijst

April 2 - 5, 2017 Nyon, Switzerland

Joint workshop of the EWRS working groups: Physical and cultural weed control and Crop-weed interactions working group

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

Uppsala

Nyon



Willow (Salix spp.): 330-500 species (hybrids) worldwide (Argus, 1997).



Perennial bioenergy crop (selected species) (1960-1980’).



Bioenergy, veneer, pulp production (Stantuft and van Oosten, 2014).



66.000 ha in Europe, 11.100 ha in Sweden (FAO, 2012).



Other uses: phytoremediation, biodiversity preservation. 1

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

PLANTING MATERIAL

cold-storage

willow nursery, winter (dormant plants)

one-year-old shoots

Photo by Nils-Erik Nordh, willow step planter

20 cm dormant cuttings

2

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

PLANTING SYSTEM AND HARVEST CYCLE

150 cm

20 cm dormant cuttings

70 cm 75 cm

willow establishment phase, spring

willow after 3 years of growth, summer

every 3 to 4 years willow regrowth, spring

willow harvest, winter

3

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

4

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Conclusions

5 cm

5 cm

AIMS:

Results

To compare competitive ability of willows planted: − from non-dormant or dormant cuttings, − early, mid and late in the growing season, − from different willow clones. non-dormant

dormant

HYPOTHESES Competitive ability: 1st affected for both crop and weed (willow and barley),

2nd clone-dependent (willow) or affected by the willow clone (barley); non-dormant > dormant cuttings in early season; in late season – reversed,

5

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

• Outdoor controlled experiment.

• Buckets as exeprimental units (in total 156).

• Experimental factors: − 2 cutting types: non-dormant and dormant, − 3 plantings: early (early May), mid (mid-May) and late (late June 2013), Ultuna

− 3 willow clones (Tora, Jorr, Olof).

• Harvested after 8 weeks (July – August 2013).

• Interaction between willow and a model weed, spring barley (cv. Waldemar). 6

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

Ability to compete (AC)(Nelson et al., 2012) b = biomass

𝐴𝐶 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 = 100 − (

𝑏𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑏𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 + 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦

) × 100 𝐴𝐶 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦 = 100 − (

𝑏𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑏𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦 + 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤

) × 100

Ability to withstand competition (AWC)(Szumigalski and VanAcker, 2015) bW with barley = willow biomass with barley bW no barley = willow biomass with no barley bB with willow = barley biomass with willow bB no willow = barley biomass with no willow

𝐴𝑊𝐶 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 = (

𝑏𝑊𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦 ) × 100 𝑏𝑊𝑛𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦

𝐴𝑊𝐶 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑒𝑦 = (

𝑏𝐵𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤 ) × 100 𝑏𝐵𝑛𝑜 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤

Willow – barley combinations per planting time: − willow + barley (24 units) (A) − only willow (24 units) (B) − only barley (4 units) (C)

(A)

(B)

(C)

7

Introduction

Aims and hypotheses

Experimental design

Measurements

Results

Conclusions

ABILITY TO COMPETE AND ABILITY TO WITHSTAND COMPETITION

AC (%)

AWC (%)

WILLOW

BARLEY

WILLOW

BARLEY

Cutting type