D-Glucan Assay with Commonly Used Intravenous Antimicrobials

7 downloads 425 Views 47KB Size Report
Glucatell assay (Associates of Cape Cod, Falmouth, MA) in. 2004 as an aid in the diagnosis of deep-seated mycoses and fungemia (3, 10, 15). (133)--D-Glucan ...
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Oct. 2006, p. 3450–3453 0066-4804/06/$08.00⫹0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00658-06 Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vol. 50, No. 10

Reactivity of (133)-␤-D-Glucan Assay with Commonly Used Intravenous Antimicrobials Francisco M. Marty,1,2,3* Colleen M. Lowry,1 Steven J. Lempitski,4 David W. Kubiak,1 Malcolm A. Finkelman,4 and Lindsey R. Baden1,2,3 Brigham & Women’s Hospital,1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,2 Harvard Medical School,3 Boston, Massachusetts, and Associates of Cape Cod, Inc., East Falmouth, Massachusetts4 Received 30 May 2006/Returned for modification 15 July 2006/Accepted 31 July 2006

Forty-four intravenous antimicrobials were tested for the presence of (133)-␤-D-glucan (BG). Colistin, ertapenem, cefazolin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefotaxime, cefepime, and ampicillin-sulbactam tested positive for BG at reconstituted-vial concentrations but not when diluted to usual maximum plasma concentrations. False-positive BG assays may occur when some antimicrobials are administered; however, this needs to be confirmed.

the exception of piperacillin-tazobactam, for which three lots were tested. All drug samples were diluted or solubilized, as specified in the product’s package insert, to yield reconstitutedvial concentrations (RVC). All diluents used in the reconstitution process were also tested. Once prepared, samples were coded, placed in BG-free vials, frozen to ⫺80°C, and shipped for analysis to Beacon Diagnostics Laboratory (East Falmouth, MA), where all samples were tested in a blind fashion. Briefly, 25 ␮l of drug sample at the RVC was added to wells in duplicate. One hundred microliters of Glucatell reagent was added to the wells. The sample and reagent were incubated at 37°C, using a time-of-onset kinetic assay (as described in the product insert). Samples that demonstrated inhibition of the reaction at RVC were serially diluted in glucan-free water. Analysis was performed using a log-log plot of time to onset versus standard concentration (pachyman). Duplicate samples were spiked with a positive control reagent. A spike recovery of 50 to 200% was required for a valid test result. RVC drug solutions that tested positive or inhibited the BG reaction when diluted to concentrations above the drug infusate concentration (DIC) were retested at the DIC and maximum plasma concentrations (MPC) as directed in the package insert or scientific literature (Table 1). Further lots of those antimicrobials that tested positive or inhibited the BG reaction were analyzed for reproducibility. All these samples were prepared and tested in a blind fashion. Seven antimicrobial agents tested positive for BG at the RVC: colistin, ertapenem, cefazolin (in vials), trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, cefotaxime, cefepime, and ampicillin-sulbactam in decreasing order (Table 2). BG was detected in additional lots of these antimicrobials at the RVC, with the exception of ampicillin-sulbactam, of which two additional lots were nonreactive. Colistin, ertapenem, cefotaxime, and cefepime had detectable BG at concentrations greater than 80 pg/ml when diluted to the DIC; two lots of colistin inhibited the reaction and needed to be diluted 500-fold in order to obtain a valid result at the DIC. Although all lyophilized cefazolin vials had detectable BG at the RVC, no premixed cefazolin bag lots from a different manufacturer had detectable BG. None of the seven agents tested positive for BG when

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Glucatell assay (Associates of Cape Cod, Falmouth, MA) in 2004 as an aid in the diagnosis of deep-seated mycoses and fungemia (3, 10, 15). (133)-␤-D-Glucan (BG) is present in the cell walls of many pathogenic fungi, including Candida sp., Aspergillus sp., and Fusarium sp. (11). Galactomannan detection by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Platelia Aspergillus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was approved by the FDA as a diagnostic aid for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in 2003 (2). Although the in vitro crossreactivity of galactomannan with piperacillin-tazobactam had been reported (1, 18), it was only after marketing the assay that clinical false-positive results were observed (14, 17). This diminished the diagnostic utility of galactomannan detection in centers where piperacillin-tazobactam had become the empirical antibacterial treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. False-positive BG results are known to occur in patients undergoing hemodialysis with cellulose membranes (5); patients treated with immunoglobulin, albumin (4, 12), or other blood products filtered through cellulose depth filters containing BG (9, 16); and patients with serosal exposure to glucancontaining gauze (6). Given the potential for fungal cell wall elements or leachates from cellulosic materials to be present in antimicrobial preparations, we sought to determine the reactivity of the BG assay among intravenous antimicrobials available in the United States. (This work was presented in part previously [F. M. Marty, C. M. Lowry, S. J. Lempitski, D. W. Kubiak, M. A. Findelman, and L. R. Baden, Abstr. 45th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. M-163, 2005].) Forty-four commercially available intravenous antimicrobial agents were tested for the presence of BG using the Glucatell assay (Table 1). An initial lot was tested for each agent, with

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, PBB-A4, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 732-8881. Fax: (617) 732-6829. E-mail: [email protected]. 3450

VOL. 50, 2006

NOTES

3451

TABLE 1. Antimicrobials, manufacturers, and lots tested Antimicrobial

Manufacturer

Lot(s)

Amikacin

Novaplus

617208A

Amphotericin B deoxycholate

Novaplus

Amphotericin B, liposomal

RVC (mg/ml)

DIC (mg/ml) a

MPC (␮g.ml)

250

NT

NT

677431

5

NT

NT

Gilead

042458AA

4

2

Ampicillin

Abraxis

4A04AH

250

NT

Ampicillin-sulbactam

Baxter

2040114 R004A R684A

250

30

Azithromycin

Pfizer

615247 728836 731654

100

2

Aztreonam

Dura

4E80157

100

40

Caspofungin

Merck

0103R

Cefazolin (premixed bag)

Baxter

LD095678 LD096487 LD096636

Cefazolin (vial)

Sandoz

Cefepime

118 NT 150

3.63

204

5

NT

20

20

185

C4274 C4711 C4761

330

20

185

Bristol-Myers Squibb

4K89752 5K09940 6B17578

100

40

164

Cefotaxime

Novaplus

014640 075792 085466

95

40

214

Cefoxitin

Abraxis

400080

100

NT

NT

Ceftazidime

GlaxoSmithKline

4532

100

NT

NT

Ceftriaxone

Roche

U6555

100

NT

NT

Cefuroxime

Novaplus

C3730

94

30

100

Chloramphenicol

Abraxis

131086

100

40

11

Ciprofloxacin

Bayer

2500L75

Clindamycin

Abbott

16356DK

150

Colistin

X-Gen

YR4CM 5T5CM 6U5CM

50

Daptomycin

Cubist

180503A

50

10

Doxycycline

Bedford Laboratories

712192

10

1

Ertapenem

Merck

3741R 3885P 3962R

100

20

Erythromycin

Abbott

22742Z7

50

NT

NT

Fluconazole

Abbott

20098JT

2

2

8.1

Gentamicin

Abraxis

141293

40

NT

NT

2

1.6 NT 3.5

NT

4.6 NT 5

133 2.6 155

Continued on following page

3452

NOTES

ANTIMICROB. AGENTS CHEMOTHER. TABLE 1—Continued

Antimicrobial

Manufacturer

Lot(s)

RVC (mg/ml)

DIC (mg/ml)

MPC (␮g.ml)

NT

NT

Imipenem

Merck

3829P

50

Itraconazole

Ortho Biotech

04A01A27

10

Levofloxacin

Ortho McNeil

25195JT

5

5

12

Linezolid

Pharmacia

04K12Z97

2

2

21

Meropenem

Astra Zeneca

KP0021

50

NT

Metronidazole

Abbott

24073JT

5

5

25

Nafcillin

Sandoz

129903

250

40

30

Oxacillin

Apothecon

2L62896

167

10

43

Penicillin G

Baxter

LN044859

25

25

400

Pentamidine

Abraxis

141387 200357 200407

60

Piperacillin-tazobactam

Pfizer

A56123 A91661 A91796

125

68

Quinupristin-dalfopristin

Monarch

2L1356

500

5

Rifampin

Bedford

575667

60

6

23

Ticarcillin-clavulanate

Novaplus

63787A

200

100

388

Tigecycline

Wyeth

B19951

10

Tobramycin

Abbott

11186DK

40

3.2

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Sicor

04P114 05P101 06A124

80

1

9

Vancomycin

Novaplus

2074327

50

10

40

Voriconazole

Pfizer

A04192

10

5

4

a

3.3

2.5

NT

3.7

NT

0.612

298

3.9

NT 12

NT, not tested.

diluted to concentrations representing the MPC. Diluents and products used in the transfer of drug did not have detectable BG levels. Several antimicrobials inhibited the BG assay at the RVC, but only azithromycin, pentamidine, and colistin remained highly inhibitory at the DIC (Table 2). The availability of noninvasive diagnostic tests for the detection of invasive fungal infections (IFI) is an important advance in the management of such infections (13). As therapeutic decisions may be made based on the results of these tests, it is important to understand their potential limitations. BG was detected in 7 of the 44 antimicrobial agents at RVC. BG was still detected in four of seven of these antimicrobials at DICs that are above the current positivity threshold for the assay. BG positivity was consistent among different antimicrobial lots, except with ampicillin-sulbactam. Some antimicrobials caused optical artifacts or inhibited the BG assay at high concentrations. Although not available in the United States, intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was found to contain

high BG levels and to cause false-positive results after clinical administration (8). There was no obvious antimicrobial class effect in terms of the BG reactivity. No antimicrobial solution had detectable BG at the usual drug MPC, but this should be interpreted with caution. As learned from the galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cross-reactivity experience with piperacillintazobactam administration (7, 17, 18), the false-positive results were not due to detection of the antimicrobial itself but to the introduction of galactofuran in the manufacturing process, which has a pharmacokinetic behavior different than that of the antimicrobial itself (18). The findings of BG content cannot be generalized to products produced by manufacturers other than those tested (Table 1). There can be lot-to-lot variability in BG content, as in the case of galactomannan (7), so additional periodic testing of antimicrobial lots commonly used in patients at risk for IFI may be warranted, especially if unexplained BG results are

VOL. 50, 2006

NOTES

TABLE 2. BG content of intravenous antimicrobialsa Concn of BG (pg/ml) at the: Medication RVC

Colistin Ertapenem Cefazolin (vials) Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Cefotaxime Cefepime Ampicillin-sulbactam Azithromycin Pentamidine Tobramycin Liposomal amphotericin B Vancomycin Oxacillin Itraconazole Doxycycline Quinupristin-dalfopristin Nafcillin Rifampin Chloramphenicol Amphotericin B deoxycholate Daptomycin Voriconazole Amikacin Aztreonam Caspofungin Cefuroxime Erythromycin Gentamicin Imipenem Piperacillin-tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate Ampicillin Cefazolin (bag) Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Ciprofloxacin Clindamycin Fluconazole Levofloxacin Linezolid Meropenem Metronidazole Penicillin G Tigecycline

4,348 3,472 2,054 1,187 560 425 519 c ⬍62,500 ⬍5,000 ⬍1,600 ⬍1,600 ⬍800 ⬍800 ⬍600 ⬍600 ⬍600 ⬍400 ⬍400 ⬍200 ⬍200 ⬍200 ⬍200 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍80 ⬍40 ⬍32 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍40 ⬍16

DIC

MPC b

627 166 67 ⬍32 153 106 ⬍4 ⬍1,250 ⬍2,187 ⬍4 ⬍16 ⬍32 4 23 ⬍16 5 22 23 39 NT Optical artifact 14 NT 14 NT 21 NT NT NT ⬍16 13 NT ⬍32 NT NT NT ⬍4 NT ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍16 NT 6 ⬍16 NT

⬍4 ⬍32 ⬍4 ⬍8 ⬍8 ⬍8 ⬍8 ⬍8 ⬍4 ⬍4 4 ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 5 NT 4 ⬍4 NT ⬍4 NT ⬍4 NT NT NT ⬍8 8 NT ⬍4 NT NT NT ⬍4 NT ⬍4 ⬍4 ⬍4 NT ⬍4 ⬍4 NT

a Drugs were ordered according to their BG reactivity. Antimicrobials that tested positive are listed first, followed by antimicrobials that inhibited the BG assay at the RVC. For positive or highly inhibitory assay results, the value provided is the average of three determinations. NT, not tested. b Only one vial was reactive; the other two lots inhibited the reaction at dilutions up to 1:500 (⬍1,563 pg/ml of BG). c Only one of three vials was reactive; the other two lots inhibited the reaction at dilutions up to 1:100 (⬍313 pg/ml of BG).

encountered. Interestingly, no piperacillin-tazobactam lots tested positive for BG. This may allow centers that use piperacillintazobactam for empirical febrile neutropenia therapy the possibility of using BG for noninvasive surveillance and diagnosis of IFI.

3453

There is limited reactivity between the BG assay and most commonly used intravenous antimicrobial agents. Caution should be used in interpreting BG assay results for drug preparations that do contain BG, as the kinetics of BG are not yet defined. Validation of these findings and correlation with clinical samples are warranted. REFERENCES 1. Ansorg, R., R. van den Boom, and P. M. Rath. 1997. Detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in foods and antibiotics. Mycoses 40:353–357. 2. Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA. 16 May 2003, posting date. Bio-Rad Laboratories Platelia® Aspergillus EIA. [Online.] http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf2/k023857.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2006. 3. Evaluation and Safety Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA. 21 May 2004, posting date. Glucatell (1-3-beta-D-glucan serological assay). [Online.] http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf3/K032373.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2005. 4. Ikemura, K., K. Ikegami, T. Shimazu, T. Yoshioka, and T. Sugimoto. 1989. False-positive result in Limulus test caused by Limulus amebocyte lysatereactive material in immunoglobulin products. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:1965– 1968. 5. Kanda, H., K. Kubo, K. Hamasaki, Y. Kanda, A. Nakao, T. Kitamura, T. Fujita, K. Yamamoto, and T. Mimura. 2001. Influence of various hemodialysis membranes on the plasma (133)-beta-D-glucan level. Kidney Int. 60:319–323. 6. Kimura, Y., A. Nakao, H. Tamura, S. Tanaka, and H. Takagi. 1995. Clinical and experimental studies of the limulus test after digestive surgery. Surg. Today 25:790–794. 7. Machetti, M., E. Furfaro, and C. Viscoli. 2005. Galactomannan in piperacillin-tazobactam: how much and to what extent? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3984–3985. 8. Mennink-Kersten, M. A., A. Warris, and P. E. Verweij. 2006. 1,3-Beta-Dglucan in patients receiving intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. N. Engl. J. Med. 354:2834–2835. 9. Nagasawa, K., T. Yano, G. Kitabayashi, H. Morimoto, Y. Yamada, A. Ohata, M. Usami, and T. Horiuchi. 2003. Experimental proof of contamination of blood components by (133)-beta-D-glucan caused by filtration with cellulose filters in the manufacturing process. J. Artif. Organs 6:49–54. 10. Odabasi, Z., G. Mattiuzzi, E. Estey, H. Kantarjian, F. Saeki, R. J. Ridge, P. A. Ketchum, M. A. Finkelman, J. H. Rex, and L. Ostrosky-Zeichner. 2004. Beta-D-glucan as a diagnostic adjunct for invasive fungal infections: validation, cutoff development, and performance in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:199–205. 11. Odabasi, Z., V. L. Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, M. R. McGinnis, and L. Ostrosky-Zeichner. 2006. Differences in beta-glucan levels in culture supernatants of a variety of fungi. Med. Mycol. 44:267–272. 12. Ogawa, M., H. Hori, S. Niiguchi, E. Azuma, and Y. Komada. 2004. Falsepositive plasma (133)-beta-D-glucan test following immunoglobulin product replacement in an adult bone marrow recipient. Int. J. Hematol. 80:97–98. 13. Patterson, T. F. 2005. Advances and challenges in management of invasive mycoses. Lancet 366:1013–1025. 14. Sulahian, A., S. Touratier, and P. Ribaud. 2003. False positive test for aspergillus antigenemia related to concomitant administration of piperacillin and tazobactam. N. Engl. J. Med. 349:2366–2367. 15. Takaki, Y., N. Seki, S. Kawabata Si, S. Iwanaga, and T. Muta. 2002. Duplicated binding sites for (133)-beta-D-glucan in the horseshoe crab coagulation factor G: implications for a molecular basis of the pattern recognition in innate immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 277:14281–14287. 16. Usami, M., A. Ohata, T. Horiuchi, K. Nagasawa, T. Wakabayashi, and S. Tanaka. 2002. Positive (133)-beta-D-glucan in blood components and release of (133)-beta-D-glucan from depth-type membrane filters for blood processing. Transfusion 42:1189–1195. 17. Viscoli, C., M. Machetti, P. Cappellano, B. Bucci, P. Bruzzi, M. T. Van Lint, and A. Bacigalupo. 2004. False-positive galactomannan platelia Aspergillus test results for patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:913–916. 18. Walsh, T. J., S. Shoham, R. Petraitiene, T. Sein, R. Schaufele, A. Kelaher, H. Murray, C. Mya-San, J. Bacher, and V. Petraitis. 2004. Detection of galactomannan antigenemia in patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and correlations between in vitro, in vivo, and clinical properties of the drug-antigen interaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4744–4748.