Decomposition dynamics of aquatic macrophytes in the lower ...

4 downloads 22 Views 250KB Size Report
Decomposition of aquatic macrophytes can considerably influence carbon cycling and energy flow in shallow freshwater aquatic ecosystems. The Atchafalaya ...
Hydrobiologia 418: 123–136, 2000. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

123

Decomposition dynamics of aquatic macrophytes in the lower Atchafalaya, a large floodplain river Juliann M. Battle1,2,∗ & Timothy B. Mihuc1,3 LA Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Forestry, Wildlife, & Fisheries, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, U.S.A. 2 Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Ichauway, Route 2, Box 2324, Newton, GA 31770, U.S.A. 3 Lake Champlain Research Institute, SUNY-Plattsburgh, 102 Hudson Hall, 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, U.S.A. Received 18 February 1999; in revised form 27 August 1999; accepted 7 September 1999

Key words: aquatic macrophytes, decay rates, decomposition, macroinvertebrates, microorganisms, riverfloodplain system Abstract Decomposition of aquatic macrophytes can considerably influence carbon cycling and energy flow in shallow freshwater aquatic ecosystems. The Atchafalaya River Basin (ARB) is a large floodplain river in southern Louisiana that experiences a seasonal floodpulse and is spatially composed of a mosaic of turbid riverine and stagnant backwater areas. During two seasons, winter and fall of 1995, we examined decomposition of four common aquatic macrophytes in the ARB: water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), arrowhead (Sagittaria platyphylla), coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata). To determine decay rates, we used litter bags of two mesh sizes (5 mm and 0.25 mm) and analyzed data with a single exponential decay model. Analysis of decay rates established several trends for aquatic macrophyte decomposition in the ARB. First, macrophytes decayed faster in fall than winter due to the effect of increased temperature. Second, macroinvertebrates were the primary decomposers of macrophytes in riverine sites and microbes were the primary decomposers in backwater areas. These trends may have been related to decomposer-habitat interactions, with well-oxygenated riverine sites more hospitable to invertebrates and backwater areas more favorable to microbes because of high organic inputs and reduced flow. Decay rates for macrophytes, ranked from slowest to fastest, were E. crassipesC. demersum>S. platyphylla>E. crassipes. (Table 1). The initial concentration of highly resistant material (i.e. lignin-cellulose) was higher in E. crassipes, S. platyphylla and H. verticillata than in C. demersum (Table 2). In fresh plant material E. crassipes had the highest ash-free dry mass (AFDM) followed by S. platyphylla, H. verticillata and C. demersum. Based on AFDM, 9–12% of the total weight of the plants was non-organic matter (Table 2). When macroinvertebrates had access to the plant material and fragmentation was permitted (i.e. the coarse-mesh bag treatment) decomposition coefficients ranged from −0.008 d−1 to −0.135 d−1 (Table 1). Plant material in bags that excluded macroinvertebrates and fragmentation (i.e. the finemesh bag treatment) had decay rates that ranged from −0.003 d−1 to −0.042 d−1 . Comparisons of decay

128

Figure 2. Decay curves for four plant species in litter bags of two mesh-sizes. Each curve is the average of four replicates. Studies were conducted in the winter and fall in riverine and backwater sites.

129 Table 1. Decay rates (1±SE) determined for four macrophytes using coarse-mesh and fine-mesh bags. Bags were placed in backwater and riverine locations during the winter and fall of 1995. Correlation coefficient (r 2 ) given for the negative exponential curve. Mean study rate is the average decay rate within each season based on water type and litter bag interaction. k=decay coefficient (d−1 ) Backwater SE

Riverine SE

r2

k

±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.003 ±0.001 ±0.003

0.88 0.92 0.62 0.74

−0.008 −0.013 −0.040 −0.040 −0.025

±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.000 ±0.000 ±0.004

0.52 0.90 0.75 0.60

−0.003 −0.012 −0.011 −0.014 −0.011

±0.000 ±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.001

0.90 0.69 0.84 0.94

−0.004 −0.006 −0.008 −0.006 −0.006

±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.000 ±0.001 ±0.000

0.14 0.12 0.72 0.47

Fall, coarse-mesh bag E. crassipes S. platyphylla C. demersum H. verticillata Mean study rates

−0.022 −0.040 −0.029 −0.061 −0.038

±0.003 ±0.002 ±0.003 ±0.003 ±0.004

0.74 0.86 0.21 0.71

−0.019 −0.034 −0.049 −0.135 −0.059

±0.002 ±0.005 ±0.009 ±0.001 ±0.012

0.79 0.52 0.27 0.77

Fall, fine-mesh bag E. crassipes S. platyphylla C. demersum H. verticillata Mean study rates

−0.020 −0.022 −0.030 −0.042 −0.029

±0.001 ±0.001 ±0.002 ±0.002 ±0.002

0.85 0.49 0.89 0.88

−0.015 −0.026 −0.015 −0.027 −0.021

±0.001 ±0.002 ±0.001 ±0.003 ±0.002

0.82 0.97 0.44 0.51

Plant species

k

Winter, coarse-mesh bag E. crassipes S. platyphylla C. demersum H. verticillata Mean study rates

−0.009 −0.010 −0.025 −0.034 −0.019

Winter, fine-mesh bag E. crassipes S. platyphylla C. demersum H. verticillata Mean study rates

rates for the coarse-mesh bag and the fine-mesh bag treatments showed faster decay of S. platyphylla, C. demersum and H. verticillata in the larger mesh-sized bag for both seasons (p0.05; Figure 2). The fastest decay rates recorded for this study were in the fall riverine site for H. verticillata and C. demersum in the coarse-mesh bag. In the coarse-mesh bag treatment in the fall, H. verticillata and C. demersum decayed faster in the riverine sites than backwater sites (p0.05; Table 1). The slowest decay rates in the coarse-mesh bag occurred in the winter for E. crassipes and S.

r2

Table 2. Initial levels of two internal components for the plant species represented as % oven-dried mass. Ash-free dry mass (AFDM) and hydrolysis resistant organic matter (HROM), a cellulose-lignin assay, given as x±1 SE Plant species

AFDM

HROM

E. crassipes S. platyphylla H. verticillata C. demersum

12.1±3.2 10.5±2.5 9.8±2.5 9.1±0.9

42.8±5.8 39.8±2.5 38.2±3.9 26.7±3.3

platyphylla (Figure 2). For the fine-mesh bag treatment in the fall, H. verticillata and C. demersum decayed faster in the backwater than the riverine loca-

130

Figure 3. Density of macroinvertebrates per litter bags shown as bars (x±1 SE). Lines indicate percent of original mass remaining (x±1 SE) as an average of E. crassipes, S. platyphylla, C. demersum and H. verticillata. Plants were in coarse-mesh litter bags placed in riverine and backwater locations during two seasons.

tion. For the fine-mesh bag treatment in the winter, H. verticillata, C. demersum and S. platyphylla decayed faster in the backwater than the riverine site (Figure 2, Table 1). Macroinvertebrates Total density of macroinvertebrates on plant detritus were 2–4 times higher in the riverine sites than the backwater sites in both fall and winter (p 0.05). The winter riverine site exhibited the lowest microbial respiration measured during the study. In the backwater site, microbial respiration was extremely elevated on 2 d compared to the riverine site and the other time points. In the fall, microbial respiration rates did not differ between sites, nor over time (p>0.05) and averaged 0.0470 µmol glucose µg−1 h−1 (Figure 5). In the winter, the bacterial density on plant detritus in the fine-mesh bag did not differ between the plant species, E. crassipes and S. platyphylla, or sites (p>0.05; Figure 6). Plant material that had decomposed for 2 d had a bacterial

131

Figure 4. NMS procedure showing macroinvertebrates in habitat space for the first three axes. Points indicate site and season combinations and vectors indicate taxa. Hya=Hyallela azteca; Dip=dipterans; Gam=Gammarus spp.; Lir=Lirceus lineatus; Cae=Caecidotea sp.; Can=Caenis sp.

Figure 5. Mean microbial respiration rates (±1 SE) determined with a 14 C tracer method on decomposing E. crassipes and S. platyphylla. Fine-mesh litter bags were located in riverine and backwater sites.

density averaging 1.4×106 cm−2 and the numbers decreased to 2.0×105 cm−2 by the end of the experiment (Figure 6).

Discussion Differences in decay rates between plant species have been related to the structural attributes of the plant tissue (Kulshreshtha & Gopal, 1982; Webster & Benfield, 1986). The highly dissected and fragile plants, H. verticillata and C. demersum, were more prone to fragmentation than the solid blade species, E. crassipes and S. platyphylla. Breakdown rates are dependent on a number of factors including the nutritional value that the plant material provides to microbial and invertebrate detritivores (Petersen & Cummins, 1974). E. crassipes had the slowest decay of the four plant types, probably due to high levels of lignocellulose

Figure 6. Bars indicate the average density (±1 SE) of bacteria on two plant species, E. crassipes and S. platyphylla. Plants were in fine-mesh bags located in riverine and backwater sites during the winter experiment. For each date, three samples of both plant species were measured.

132 Table 3. Reported decay rates (k) for hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata), coontail (Ceratophyllum spp.), and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Species

Temp. or season

H. verticillata H. verticillata

18–22 ◦ C 12 ◦ C 28 ◦ C

C. demersum C. demersum C. echinatum C. demersum

10 ◦ C 18 ◦ C 16–18 ◦ C 18–22 ◦ C 12 ◦ C 28 ◦ C

E. crassipes E. crassipes E. crassipes

28 ◦ C July–Nov. 20 ◦ C

E. crassipes

28 ◦ C

E. crassipes E. crassipes

25–34 ◦ C 12 ◦ C 28 ◦ C

k (d−1 )

Experimental conditions

Source

−0.020 −0.010† −0.037† −0.035† −0.098† −0.033 −0.042 −0.021 −0.066 −0.009† −0.032† −0.023† −0.039† −0.022 −0.006 −0.028 −0.039 −0.009 −0.013 −0.030 −0.003† −0.008† −0.018† −0.020†

Laboratory microbial Swamp microbial Swamp Swamp microbial Swamp Laboratory microbial Laboratory microbial Laboratory microbial Laboratory microbial Swamp microbial Swamp Swamp microbial Swamp Laboratory microbial Experimental ponds River microbial River Laboratory microbial Lake Lake Swamp microbial Swamp Swamp microbial Swamp

Kulshreshtha & Gopal, 1982 This study

Best et al. 1990 Bastardo, 1979 Kulshreshtha & Gopal, 1982 This study

Singal et al. 1993 Reddy & DeBusk, 1991 Bartodziej, 1992 Gaur et al. 1992 Howard-Williams & Junk, 1976 This study

†Value based on average of riverine and backwater sites.

and a waxy-cutin outer layer (Table 2). Initial level of nitrogen is also an indication of the value of the plant as a food source (Webster & Benfield, 1986). A review of the literature indicated that nitrogen concentrations from lowest to highest were E. crassipes (1.7%), H. verticillata (2.3%), C. demersum (2.8%) and S. platyphylla (3.2%) (Karim, 1948; Langeland, 1982; Sutton & Portier, 1983; Sutton & Portier, 1991; Newman, 1991; Zimba et al., 1993). E. crassipes decay rates did not differ in the presence or absence of invertebrates, which suggests that leaching and microorganisms were responsible for the majority of E. crassipes decay. This conclusion is supported by Gaur et al. (1992) who found that in the presence of microbes the decay rate of E. crassipes was double that of a non-microbial treatment. Still, microbial breakdown of E. crassipes was very slow compared to the other plant types, suggesting that detritus unpalatable to invertebrates is also resistant to microbial colonization (Bärlocher & Kendrick, 1981).

Our practice of pre-drying the plants may have altered the natural decay process (Gessner, 1991). Bärlocher & Biddiscombe (1996) measured fungal biomass up to five times higher on aerial leaf parts than those submersed and suggested early decomposition of emergent plants occurs while the plant is still located above the water and bacterial processes become dominant when emergent plants enter the water. Therefore our methods of pre-drying may have underestimated the contribution of fungi in decay, especially for emergent plants (Newell et al., 1995; Bärlocher & Biddiscombe, 1996), and accelerated leaching for all plant species (Gessner, 1991). Nonetheless, decay rates from this study were comparable to studies in other regions that examined different aquatic macrophyte species (Hill & Webster, 1982; Kulshreshtha & Gopal, 1982; Chergui & Pattee, 1990; Bianchi & Findlay, 1991). Comparison of similar plant species also showed that our decay rates corresponded to what others have reported (Table 3).

133 Macroinvertebrate assemblages showed distinct patterns between seasons and habitats during this study. In winter, amphipods and isopods were the predominant taxa in both habitats. High densities of isopods only occurred in winter (J. Battle, personal observation) implying that these detritus feeders have adapted their life history to the annual input of organic material. Amphipods, Hyallela azteca and Gammarus spp., are omnivore-detritivores (Merritt & Cummins, 1996) and inhabit vegetation and debris throughout the ARB. Bartodziej (1992) found that H. azteca and Gammarus trigrinus substantially increased decay of E. crassipes. Similarly, Kaushik & Hynes (1971) observed that Gammarus spp. significantly contributed to decay of allochthonous detritus. The mayfly Caenis, a prevalent insect in the backwater during fall and winter, is documented to prefer sediments in littoral regions of lentic habitats (Merritt & Cummins, 1996) and is capable of inhabiting oxygen-stressed habitats because it has a large gill surface area (Berner & Pescador, 1988). By living in a stressful environment, Caenis is able to avoid competition and predation by other macroinvertebrates, but is supplied with an abundant food source that may be lacking in riverine areas because river flow can rapidly remove organic material. H. azteca and dipterans, composed mainly of chironomids, were major contributors to decay in the fall riverine site. Dipterans are recognized as a group of ecologically important aquatic insects that feed on a variety of detrital materials (Pinder, 1986). In general, patterns in macroinvertebrate assemblages between habitat and season during these experiments reflected differences in physical and chemical characteristics between backwater and riverine habitats in the ARB and seasonal life history traits of macroinvertebrates in the ARB. To some extent, macroinvertebrate density and composition differences likely had an effect on observed differences in plant mass loss. For example, the riverine site had a higher macroinvertebrate density, primarily detritivorous amphipods and higher decomposition rates than the backwater sites. This suggests that the higher density of macroinvertebrates in riverine sites is increasing plant mass loss by consumption and fragmentation. Processing of macrophytes by microorganisms was slower in winter than fall most likely due to substantially lower temperatures. It has been well documented that reduced temperatures can decrease microbial metabolism (Bärlocher & Kendrick, 1974; Moran & Hodson, 1989). Yet, both the fall and winter backwater sites had similar microbial respiration on macrophyte

species. The high microbial respiration recorded in the winter backwater site may be explained by the fact that the water level was rising at this time (Figure 1). Edwards & Meyer (1986) found that in a large floodplain river in Georgia, bacterial numbers increased as water levels rose and were greatest during the first flood of the season. In winter, the backwater area had more elevated microbial respiration associated with the detrital samples than the riverine site and this accounted for the faster decay rates by microorganisms in the backwater location (Table 1). Microorganisms most likely flourished in stagnant backwater areas because there is an abundant energy source provided by decaying autochthonous matter (i.e. macrophytes, phytoplankton, periphyton), allochthonous material from the floodplain and dissolved organic matter derived from leaching. In the fall experiment, no positive relationship was detected between microbial respiration and decay rates. We found that plants had faster decay by microbes in backwater than riverine sites, but microbial respiration rates on macrophytes did not differ between habitat types. A possible explanation for the lack of correlation is that the hypoxic conditions in the backwater site caused the establishment of an anaerobic microbial community and their respiration could not be detected by our assay. Most likely, microbes in the backwater were facultative anaerobic bacteria that adapted their metabolism to grow either in the presence or absence of oxygen using fermentation or anaerobic respiration. The initial high microbial respiration rates measured in this study suggests that microorganisms were quickly colonizing the detritus and removing the labile products, but then rates slowed as the substrate became more refractory. Hargrave (1972) reported that oxygen consumption of microorganisms colonizing Phragmites detritus increased up to the second or third day and fell to a stable level by 7 d; we measured similar patterns of microbial respiration. Respiration rates may have also decreased in later stages of decay because of overcrowding of microorganisms (Hargrave, 1972; Naiman, 1983). During initial decomposition of leaves it has been found that fungi tend to be dominant and bacteria are important in later stages (Suberkropp & Klug, 1976). In our study bacteria colonized rapidly (1.4×106 cm−2 by 2 d) and then declined to 2.0×105 cm−2 after 28 d. Average bacteria density we reported was also lower then those reported for allochthonous inputs (Bengtsson, 1992; Sridhar & Bärlocher, 1993; Baldy et al.,

134

Figure 7. Simple diagram indicating the distribution of mass loss for aquatic macrophytes in the ARB during winter and fall. The four plant species were averaged to determine a mean mass loss caused by microbes and other agents (animals and fragmentation) for the last day of each experiment. Leaching was the average mass loss of the four plant species that occurred the first day they were in the water during the fall experiment. Unprocessed indicates amount of material remaining at the end of the experiment. To calculate percentages: ‘microbes’=[initial mass (100%) – leaching (28%)] – % mass remaining in fine-mesh bag, and ‘other agents’=‘microbes’ – % mass loss for coarse-mesh bag.

1995) and for C. demersum (Underwood, 1991). The fast colonization rate and rapid decline in density may be due to deleterious effects of the small mesh-size of the litter bags. Bags of such fine-mesh material may have resulted in reduced flow over plant material and provided a surface for microbes to colonize and thereby altered the microhabitat (Petersen & Cummins, 1974). The role of bacteria, as well as fungi, in the decay of macrophytes in the ARB is an area for future research. To examine decay of macrophytes in the ARB incorporating temporal and spatial features we designed a simple diagram (Figure 7). The diagram distributes mass loss into different compartments: leaching, microbes, other agents (animals and fragmentation), and unprocessed material. Macrophytes exposed to other agents in riverine habitats had equal or greater mass loss than plants processed by microbes exclusively. Greater mass loss of plant material by other agents in riverine sites compared to backwater sites is most likely attributed to the higher macroinvertebrate density (Merritt & Lawson, 1979). This suggests that the role of macroinvertebrates in plant breakdown differs among habitats and emphasizes the importance of invertebrates in decomposition processes in

riverine habitats. High macroinvertebrate numbers in riverine areas may be a product of the constant flow that provides well-oxygenated waters and allows continual colonization by invertebrates. In addition, the high macroinvertebrate density and strong current in riverine habitats may be a source of significant biotic and abiotic fragmentation. In contrast, backwater areas seasonally have low D.O. levels and minimal flow that might prevent establishment of some invertebrates. Furthermore, we found that other agents caused greater mass loss in the winter than the fall, probably because winter temperatures did not inhibit the ability of invertebrates to process material. Microorganisms contributed to a larger portion of plant loss in backwater areas than in riverine sites (Figure 7). Riverine sites have high turbidity (Davidson, 1996) and microbes may have contributed less to the decay of plants due to the effects of sedimentation, which can limit the activity of microorganisms and compact the litter (Vargo et al., 1998). Apart from the decomposition of plant material, bacteria can seriously influence large river systems (Edwards & Meyer, 1986). Bacteria can deplete oxygen levels in low-flow backwater areas, thereby altering species composition and establishment of aerobic organisms.

135 Decomposer microbes may also modify the system by recycling carbon (Rich & Wetzel, 1978) and nutrients (Weibe, 1979) that can be vital to macrophytes and other organisms living on the periphery of backwaters. The mosaic of anaerobic and aerobic conditions in backwater and riverine habitats may help explain the high productivity of southern river-floodplain systems (Lambou, 1990).

Acknowledgements We extend thanks to Frank Spiess, Becky Jesse and James Mancuso for their help in the field and laboratory. S. Golladay and several anonymous reviewers provided useful comments. We are grateful to K. Carman and S. Pomeranko for their advice and use of their laboratory in completing the microbial part of this study. Funding for this project was provided by Federal Emergency Management Agency through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Additional assistance was provided by the Louisiana Cooperative Fisheries and Wildlife Research Unit and Louisiana State University School of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries. Support in preparing this manuscript was provided by the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center.

References Baldy, V., M. O. Gessner & E. Chauvet, 1995. Bacteria, fungi and the breakdown of leaf litter in a large river. Oikos 74: 93–102. Bärlocher, F. & N. R. Biddiscombe, 1996. Geratology and decomposition of Typha latifolia and Lythrum salicaria in a freshwater marsh. Arch. Hydrobiol. 136: 309–325. Bärlocher, F. & B. Kendrick, 1974. Dynamics of the fungal population on leaves in a stream. J. Ecol. 62: 761–791. Bärlocher, F. & B. Kendrick, 1981. Role of aquatic hyphomycetes in the trophic structure of streams. In Wicklow, D. T. & G. C. Carrol (eds), The Fungal Community, Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem. New York Basel, New York: 743–761. Bartodziej, W., 1992. Amphipod contribution to waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) decay. Fl. Scientist 55: 103–111. Bastardo, H., 1979. Laboratory studies on decomposition of littoral plants. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 26: 267–299. Bengtsson, G., 1992. Interactions between fungi, bacteria and beech leaves in a stream microcosm. Oecologia 89: 542–549. Berner, L. & M. L. Pescador, 1988. The mayflies of Florida. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, Florida: 415 pp. Best, E. P. H., J. H. A. Dassen, J. J. Boon & G. Wiegers, 1990. Studies on decomposition of Ceratophyllum demersum litter under laboratory and field conditions: losses of dry mass and nutrients, qualitative changes in organic compounds and consequences for ambient water and sediments. Hydrobiologia 194: 91–114.

Bianchi, T. S. & S. Findlay, 1991. Decomposition of Hudson estuary macrophytes: photosynthetic pigment transformations and decay constants. Estuaries 14: 65–73. Brinson, M. M., A. E. Lugo & S. Brown, 1981. Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 123–161. Bryan, C. F. & D. S. Sabins, 1979. Management implications in water quality and fish standing stock information in the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana. In Day Jr. J. W., D. D. Culley Jr., R. E. Turner & A. J. Mumphrey Jr. (eds), Proceedings of the Third Coastal Marsh and Estuary Management Symposium. Louisiana State University Division of Continuing Education, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 293–316. Buddington, R. K., 1980. Hydrolysis-resistant organic matter as a reference for measurement of fish digestive efficiency. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 109: 653–655. Carman, K. R., 1993. Microautoradiographic detection of microbial activity. In Kemp, P. F., B. F. Sherr, E. B. Sherr & J. J. Cole (eds), Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan: 397–404. Chergui, H. & E. Pattee, 1990. The processing of leaves of trees and aquatic macrophytes in the network of the River Rhine. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 75: 281–302. Davidson, N., 1996. Physicochemical relationships with the abundance and distribution of crustacean zooplankton in the Atchafalaya River Basin. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA: 123 pp. Deming, J. W., 1993. 14 C tracer method for measuring microbial activity in deep-sea sediments. In Kemp, P. F., B. F. Sherr, E. B. Sherr & J. J. Cole (eds), Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan: 405–414. Edwards, R. T. & J. L. Meyer, 1986. Production and turnover of planktonic bacteria in two sub-tropical blackwater rivers. Apl. envir. Microbiol. 52: 1317–1323. Gaur, S., P. K. Singhal & S. K. Hasija, 1992. Relative contributions of bacteria and fungi to water hyacinth decomposition. Aquat. Bot. 43: 1–15. Gessner, M. O., 1991. Differences in processing dynamics of fresh and dried leaf litter in a stream ecosystem. Freshwat. Biol. 26: 387–398. Hargrave, B. T., 1972. Aerobic decomposition of sediment and detritus as a function of particle surface area and organic content. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 583–596. Hill, B. H. & J. R. Webster, 1982. Aquatic macrophyte breakdown in an Appalachian river. Hydrobiologia 89: 53–59. Howard-Williams, C. & W. J. Junk, 1976. The decomposition of aquatic macrophytes in the floating meadows of a central Amazonian varzea lake. Biogeographica 7: 115–123. Jenny, H., S. P. Gessel & F. T. Bingham, 1949. Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci. 68: 419–432. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In Dodge, D. P. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Large river Symposium. Canadian Special Publications in Fisheries Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127. Karim, A., 1948. Microbiological decomposition of water hyacinth. Soil Sci. 66: 401–416. Kaushik, N. K. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1968. Experimental study on the role of autumn-shed leaves in aquatic environments. J. Ecol. 56: 229–243. Kaushik, N. K. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1971. The fate of dead leaves that fall into streams. J. Ecol. 56: 229–243.

136 Kruskal, J. B., 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115–129. Kulshreshtha, M. & B. Gopal, 1982. Decomposition of freshwater vegetation. I. Submerged and free-floating macrophytes. In Gopal, B., R. E. Turner, R. G. Wetzel & D. F. Whigham (eds), Wetlands Ecology and Management Part II. International Scientific Publications & National Institute of Ecology: 259–278. Lambou, V. W., 1990. Importance of bottomland hardwood forest zones to fishes and fisheries: the Atchafalaya Basin, a case history. In Gosselink, J. G., L. C. Lee & T. A. Muir (eds), Ecological Processes and Cumulative Impacts: Illustrated by Bottomland Hardwood Wetland Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan: 125–193. Langeland, K. A., 1982. Relationships among hydrosiol, water chemistry, transparency, chlorophyll a, and submersed macrophyte biomass. University of Florida. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mather, P. M., 1976. Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. J. Wiley & Sons, London: 532 pp. McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1997. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. PC-ORD for windows, Version 3.04. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon. Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1996. Aquatic insects of North America, third edition. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Iowa: 862 pp. Merritt, R. W. & D. L. Lawson, 1979. Leaf litter processing in floodplain and stream communities. In Johnson, R. R. & J. F. McCormick (eds), Strategies for Protection and Management of Floodplain Wetlands and Other Riparian Wetlands and Other Riparian Ecosystems. National Riparian Ecosystems Symposium, Callaway Gardens, Georgia: 93–105. Moran, A. M. & R. E. Hodson, 1989. Bacterial secondary production on vascular plant detritus: relationships to detritus composition and degradation rate. Apl. envir Microbiol. 55: 2178–2189. Naiman, R. J., 1983. The annual pattern and spatial distribution of aquatic oxygen metabolism in boreal forest watersheds. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 73–94. Newell, S. Y., M. A. Moran, R. Wicks & R. E. Hodson, 1995. Productvities of microbial decomposers during early stages of decomposition of leaves of a freshwater sedge. Freshwat. Biol. 34: 135–148. Newman, R. M., 1991. Herbivory and detritivory on freshwater macrophytes by invertebrates: a review. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 10: 89–114. Olson, J. S., 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322–332. Petersen, R. C. & K. W. Cummins, 1974. Leaf processing in a woodland stream. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 343–368.

Pinder, L. C. V., 1986. Biology of freshwater chironomidae. Ann. Rev. Ent. 31: 1–23. Reddy, K. R. & W. F. DeBusk, 1991. Decomposition of water hyacinth detritus in eutrophic lake water. Hydrobiologia 211: 101–109. Rich, P. H. & R. G. Wetzel, 1978. Detritus in the lake ecosystem. Am. Nat. 112: 57–71. Singhal, P. K., L. Varghese & L. Talegaonkar, 1993. Abiotic and microbial decomposition of pre- and post-bloom leaves of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (mart.) Solms). Hydrobiologia 259: 115–119. Sparks, R. E., 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. BioScience 45: 168–182. Suberkropp, K. F., G. L. Godshalk & M. J. Klug, 1976. Changes in the chemical composition of leaves during processing in a woodland stream. Ecology 57: 720–727. Suberkropp, K. F. & M. J. Klug, 1976. Fungi and bacteria associated with leaves during processing in a woodland stream. Ecology 57: 707–719. Sutton, D. L. & K. H. Portier, 1983. Variation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents of hydrilla in south Florida. J. aquat. Plant Manag. 21: 87–92. Sutton, D. L. & K. M. Portier, 1991. Influence of spikerush plants on growth and nutrient content of hydrilla. J. aquat. Plant Manag. 29: 6–11. Sridhar, K. R. & F. Bärlocher, 1993. Seasonal changes in microbial colonization of fresh and dried leaves. Arch. Hydrobiol. 128: 1– 12. Underwood, G. J. C., 1991. Colonization and invasion of leaves of the aquatic macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum L. by epiphytic bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 21: 267–275. Vargo, S. M., R. K. Neely & S. M. Kirkwood, 1998. Emergent plant decomposition and sedimentation: response to sediments varying in texture, phosphorus content and frequency of deposition. Envir. Exp. Bot. 40: 43–58. Webster, J. R. & E. F. Benfield, 1986. Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 567–594. Weibe, W. J., 1979. Anaerobic benthic processes: changes from the estuary into the continental shelf. In Livingston, R. J. (ed.), Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Pelnum, New York: 469–485. Weider, R. K. & G. E. Lang, 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63: 1636–1642. Zimba, P. V., M. S. Hopson & D. E. Colle, 1993. Elemental composition of five submersed aquatic plants collected from Lake Okeechobee, Florida. J. aquat. Plant Manag. 31: 137–140.