Determination of thermal properties of food materials ... - Springer Link

0 downloads 0 Views 608KB Size Report
r r 0. T constants. Blot number (= hr0/k ) simplification factors isobaric specific heat of dry air isobaric specific heat of ..... Composition : 100 water;30 sugar;3 agor. 9. Size :50.0 mm ..... Guide and Data Book (Applications). New York: ASHRAE.
W~irme-

und Stofffibertragung

Warme-undStoffiibertragung

12 (1979)261-268

Thermo-and Fluid Dvnamics 9 by Springer-Verlag ]979

Determination of Thermal Properties of Food Materials Theory and Experiments K. Badari

Narayana

and M.

V. Krishna

Murthy,

Madras

Abstract. Mathematical models are presented for predicting the time-temperature characteristics during air cooling of moist food products in the shape of infinite slab, infinite cylinder and sphere, taking into account the mass transfer effects at the surface. An experiment to determine the time-temperature characteristics of food products from which the thermal properties can be determined using the proposed mathematical model is described. The present analysis predicts faster cooling rates compared to an analysis which considers only pure convection heat transfer at the boundary. Time-temperature histories of some food models, fruits and vegetables are obtained experimentally. A nonlinear estimation procedure is used to match the experimentally obtained time-temperature histories with theoretical results to evaluate the unknown thermal properties of the products studied. Bestimmung

thermischer

StoffgrSBen

von Lebensmitteln

- Theorie und Experiment

Zusammenfassun~. Mit Hilfe eines mathematischen Modells lassen sich die Temperaturfelder w~ihrend der Luftkiihlung feuchter Lebensmittel in der Form einer Platte, eines Zylinders oder einer Kugel berechnen. In einem Versuch kSnnen dann die thermischen ZustandsgrSBen durch Vergleich mit dem Modell bestimmt werden. Die vorgelegte Untersuchung sagt hShere Kiihlungsraten voraus, verglichen mit dem Fall reiner Konvektionskiihlung an der Oberfl~iche. Die zeitlichenTemperaturverl~iufe in einigen Lebensmitteln, Frfichten und Gemiisen werden experimentell ermittelt. Indem man diese experimentellen Daten durch eine nichtlineare Vergleichsmethode an die theoretischen Werte anpaBt, lassen sich die nicht bekannten StoffgrSBen der Produkte ermitteln.

Nomenclature

T constants Blot number

a,b,c Bi

CI,C2,C c P c

(= hr0/k )

simplification

3

factors

difference between theoretical perimental value enthalpy of air enthalpy of saturated air

s

h

hf

w

humidity ratio of air number of thermocouple locations thermal diffusivity reference thermal diffusivity

isobaric specific heat of dry air

F

time relative humidity

Subscripts

g

k k' P Ps

effective thermal conductivity diffusion coefficient vapour pressure of the unsaturated air vapour pressure of the wetted surface

R

radius radius vector half slab thickness,

db s wb z

dry bulb surface wet bulb maximum

value of the time

Superscripts radius of cylinder or

sphere

T

~0 T

and ex-

heat transfer coefficient latent heat of vaporization

r r0

temperature

temperature product initial temperature

x

isobaric specific heat of water vapour

experimental

t t.

1

Ps H H

e

temperature

* + '

production

I Introduction

dimensionless variable dimensionless independent parameter properties at unsaturated conditions

to centres of processing

and preservation,

is carried out to retain their quality over short duraPrecooling water,

of food products

using refrigerated

prior to their transportation

from

air or

centres of

tions. An a-priori knowledge histories of the product,

of the time-temperature

cooling rate and time during

262

W~rme-

such a cooling process evaluation

is essential

of the refrigeration

sing equipment

and control

duct. Theoretical

thermophysical

perimental

load, design

properties

for an assessment

reliable

diffusivity for the food products or if available,

a

h

Fig. 1. Physical precooling

are often either not

o

*Cooling oir dry bulb temper~lure=tdb Cooling oir wet bulb ternperoture=twb

Thermo-

and thermal

incomplete,

Air flow

Air flow

Such

of the ex-

and methods. conductivity

ir flow

character-

only when

of it are available.

data like thermal

available

of proces-

of the cooling

plant, equipment

physical

for the proper

is possible

data are also necessary

12 (1979)

of the quality of the pro-

prediction

istics of a food product

und Stoffiibertragung

model

and coordinate

system

for air-

fragmentary

or inaccessible. tical utility. Even The

measurement

product

normally

the material are moist in them

of thermal requires

bodies

is always

dient of water moisture

a temperature

to be tested.

porous

resulting

the product

Food

gradient

products

in general,

energy

transfer

conduction

in the liquid within the pores.

tional energy

transfer,

if not properly

accounted

conductivity.

In other words,

any mathematical

which

to estimate

is used

should

consider

transfer.

data for food products which

accounts

estimating

are mostly

the transient

of Heissler

results

of food materials

ponds

as these charts

[10-12]

during

pressure

face temperature

ture. However,

transfer

paper,

of some

to determine

these experimental

Even

tories is described. for any porous

to of food

like slabs,

cylinders

is presented of moisture

consiat the

determined

time-temperature

food models

and actual food

the thermal

and analytical This method

moist

model

characteristics

like fruits and vegetables

a theory

of the cooling air.

air precooling

Experimentally

whereas,

a mathematical

temperature

during

characteristics

A method for

cooled

the effects of evaporation

products

are also presented. properties temperature

from his-

is valid in general

body.

like those

will yield er-

pressure

to model gradients

be a futile mathematical

assume

surface

2 The Analytical

Model

that

at the sur-

is made

to evaluate

migration

of mois-

of reliable values

for

foi~ food products,

the interaction

lem

model

is shown

and coordinate

in Figure

heat conduction

equation

I r

b (rnbt) br b-r

lbt = ~ b~

where n = 0

for slabs

n = 1

for cylinders

of temperature

within the product exercise

The physical

I. One

system

dimensonal

for the model

of the probFourier

is written as

corres-

of water

of internal

in the absence

for

characteristics

air precooling

diffusion coefficients

and moisture

dering

being

of different geometries

surface.

data

that are available

and no attempt

the relative importance

any attempt

products

and spheres

are valid only for pure

at the product

to the saturation

moisture

etc. [7-9]

In the present predict the time

or cooling rates charts

of the product

situations.

of heat and mass

the vapour

[1-6].

use of conventional

The few analyses prediction

ality, it is the wet bulb temperature

model

upon

is not true in practice.

[12] the dry bulb temperature

in re-

property

based

temperatures

or Gurnie-Lurie

heat transfer

thermal

which

example air is in

in

conductivity

for only heat transfer

of food products,

roneous

available

For

tem-

the effects of both heat and mass

The presently

condition, in reference

coarse.

that the cooling

perature

for,

temperature

are rather assumed

in

of the cooling air is taken to be the asymptotic

of thermal

the thermal measured

references

presented

of

This addi-

estimate

the experimentally

Similarly

and free

will only lead to an erroneous

from

gra-

then, the approaches

in [I0] it has been a saturated

gradient

with a partial pressure

in an additional

the above

in

This gives rise to migration

along with molecular

convection

for any

and any temperature

coupled

vapour.

conductivity

will only

without any prac-

and n = 2

for spheres.

(I)

K. Badari Narayana and M.V. Krishna Murthy: Determination of Thermal Properties of Food Materials The initial and boundary

t

=ti;

bt

= 0, r = 0, v > 0

b-~

0O .

difference Eq. (I0) to of

for the follow-

[14] : (i) dry bulb temper(tdb = 0 to 3.2),

of cooling air (corresponding and relative humidity

(iii) product initial temperature

3 Numerical

boundary

have been calculated

of parameters

1.6 to 4.8) and (iv) Blot number

Eq. (9) is rewritten by expressing the enthalpy of air as a second degree polynomial in dry bulb temperature (H = a + btdb + ct2b ). Thus

Backward

L15]. The cooling characteristics

moist food products

tdb considered

Ps

on an

using Crank-Nicolson

is used for the nonlinear

avoid oscillations

bulb temperature

with the non-

condition is solved numerically

ature of cooling air 0 - 25r

bT

equation

digital computer

implicit finite difference

ing ranges

~-~ =

(llb)

(ii) wet to

value of 0 to I),

of 20 to 60~

(t~ =

of 0.01 to I0.0.

Results

Figure 2 shows a typical air precooling characteris-

DT ( C 1 T2s + C 2 T s + C 3 ) ; R = 1, r b--~=-Bi

(10)

tics where the present theory is compared with the conventional Gurnie-Lurie chart [8]. It is seen that

where

the rate of cooling as predicted by the present analysis is m u c h higher than that predicted by GurnieLurie theories, because of the additional mechanism of heat transfer namely latent heat transfer that is

C2 =

b + 2t + ) Cp+ WCps wb

(10b)

included in the analysis. The limiting temperature of the product can be observed to be the wet bulb

264

W~rme-

und Stoff~bertragung

12 (1979)

1.0 0.8 0.6 ~- 0.4 0.Z

Fig. 2. Comparison of present theory for pre-cooling with that of Gurnie-Lurie (cylindrical product)

F i g . 4. The a i r cooling tunnel 1. I n s u l a t e d t u n n e l , 2. O r i f i c e p l a t e , 3. Betz m a n o m e t e r , 4. C e n t r i f u g a l b l o w e r , 5. F l e x i b l e c o n n e c t i o n , 6. D i s c h a r g e t h r o t t l e v a I v e , 7. Cooling c o i l s , 8. T h e r m o s t a t bath (low t e m p ) , 9. V a n e , 10. H e a t i n g / c o o l i n g c o i l s , 11. H e a t i n g / c o o l i n g b a t h , 12. Baffle p l a t e s , 13. T h e r m i s t o r s e n s o r , 14. D . B . & W . B . t h e r m o c o u p l e s , 15. 1 2 - p o i n t r e c o r d e r , 16. P r e c i s i o n b a l a n c e , 17. S u s p e n s i o n s y s t e m , 18. Food product

temperature

ysis predicts lesser cooling time (9.23 hr) than the

Presenl Theory

0 0.01

" .

0.1

t.0

6.0

of the cooling air. Gurnie-Lurie

ysis predicts a higher temperature

anal-

for the product

conventional

charts.

This is due to the fact that even

with the limiting value being the dry bulb temperature

with saturated

of the cooling air. The problem

due to the partial vapour

in reference

[163 is reworked

of cooling a meat using the present

slab anal-

between

air, the surface evaporation

the product

that the cooling time for the

increasing

meat

0.0508

to air at

unaffected by changes

an initial

other parameters

slab of thickness

dry bulb temperature

uniform

temperature

m exposed to drop from

of 26.7~

to 4.4~

duct centre is 6.03 hr as compared dicted by the Gurnie'lurie cent relative humidity the present

analysis,

conventional

charts.

saturated

analysis.

at the pro-

to 9.6 hours preA value of 75 per

for cooling air is assumed which is not considered However,

in

in the

even for the case of

air flow over the product,

the present anal-

the overall heat transfer.

and thus

Cooling rate is

in dry bulb temperature

remaining

enthalpy potential remains bulb temperature

can occur

gradient existing

surface and the ambient,

ysis and it is observed

1.7~

pressure

constant.

constant for a fixed wet

of air and product initial temper-

ature irrespective relative humidity

of the dry bulb temperature

is found to increase

with increase

It is observed

from

Figure

rate

is lower at higher air wet bulb temper-

(dis/dr)

in Blot number.

3 that the actual cooling

is higher at higher wet bulb temperature. clear from crease

_.

and

of the cooling air. The cooling rate

ature, even though the relative cooling rate

i 1.0~ ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ _ _ ~

with

This is because

the definition of T. Because

in both temperature

ference between

and vapour

(dTs/dV~)

This fact is of the inpressure

dif-

the product and the surrounding

at higher product temperatures, cooling rate also increases

it is observed

air that

with t.. 1

4 Experiments

- ---F-/ &0O5

0.01

R=1.0 R =0.5 RI =~

0:~ 213 l q 1.121 s l 6 qq 1:50

I lg

0.1

I 1.0

The experimental

setup shown

in Figure

4 consists of

a closed circuit air tunnel with a test section size of 20 cm

square.

humidity

The required

temperatures,

relative

and velocity of air in the duct are main-

Fig.3. Time-temperature characteristics of m o i s t materials during air-precooling ( e f f e c t of wet bulb

tained and controlled

temperature

- cooling coils and throttle valve. Experiments

)

in the test section using heating are

K. Badari

Narayana

='-C~"" ~

and M.V.

Krishna

Murthy:

Determination

Composition : 100 water;30 sugar;3 agor Size :50.0 mm OIA.sphere Cooling medium : Air \ Dry bulb temperature : 2g.0~ k Wet bulb temperature :23.5 ~ ') Velocity :1A75 m/s ~'\\ \ Product initial \ ~ temperature : 32.0oC, 49.0 C

9 4.s 4.6 44

o

'~ k\

42

\

X

....

~

-

R= 0.75

1 9

4.O

o

Properties

of Food

Materials

265

~x~, ~ . Composition:~ 1 0 0 water; 25 sugar:3 ogor ~ \~ - - - - 1 0 0 woteq 10 sugar;3ogor _ \"~ x~. / Shape :slob 40 \~'~ ~x%.\ 11 Eooling medium :Air % ' ~ \HI Dry bulb temperature :19.5~

%,, " ~ .

l

i

Welbulb~emperoture:16.0~

35

R = 0.25,

R=O

%,\

"xx,~ ',,

of Thermal

30

" 4 ~

- a (o.so),,~-

-'--,

~

%.

x'N

Nurnbegi/nthe///bmc//k/efsh//ow the////posffbn of the thermocoupbin cm) 1

~. 25

4

0

8

. . . . . .

12

16 rain

L F--

20

Time Fig. 6. Experimental time-temperature histories during air-preeooling (effect of variation of sugar content)

32 30 28

from

Z

4.

5

8 10 tZ ]ime ,-..-----

Fig.5. Air cooling of model duct initial-temperature)

1/+

16 rnin t0

Figure

crease.

food gel (effect of pro-

5 at higher product initial temperatures,

when both evaporation Figure

and sensible heat transfer in-

6 shows

that the effect of decreasing

the sugar content is to increase is due to the increase

the cooling rate. This

in the initial moisture

of the product at lower sugar contents. conducted

on (i) food models

agar-agar,

of sugar,

and water in different proportions

(ii) fruits and vegetables.

The temperature

ious depths in the product dia copper-constantan the product. recorder

consisting

is measured

history of the product.

in

as shown

7 that lower sugar content products

are

by higher moisture

loss

is found to increase

Figures

by suspending in Figure

0.03

the product

4. A Sartorius

the time-temperature

istics of some

products

It is observed

from

ratio and hence

in wet bulb

3

is used for this purpose.

5 and 6 show

of the product

in air velocity,

and decrease

temperature.

Results

bulb temperatures

with increase

product initial temperature

0.02 5 Experimental

loss. Moisture

the time-temperature

The weight loss of the product

during cooling is measured on to a balance

embedded

Figure

accompanied

12 point potentiometric

is used to record

precision balance

using 0.1 mm

thermocouples

Hartman-Braun

and at var-

from

content

It is observed

character-

obtained during air cooling.

the experiments

that at lower wet

of the cooling air, the cooling rate

increases.

The increase

the enhancement

driving force is the reason

in the humidity

of the mass

for this. Also,

in the cooling rate of the product

transfer an increase

could be observed

~ O.Ol

Z

J

oY 0

ti= 40~

12 Time ,

=lg~176

1

100

2 3 4

100 100 100

5

100

6

100 18

10 15 20 25 30 40 2~4

--

3 3 3 3 3 3

_

rain

P

F i g . 7. D e h y d r a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of food m o d e l s during a i r - p r e c o o l i n g (cylindrical product)

30

266

6

W~rme-

of

Determination

Thermal

Properties

12 (1979)

und Stoff~bertragung

+ Tz

x

[Tn(~)- T e , n ( ~ ) ] 2 d ~ Thermal

properties

evaluated

of the products

by matching

time-temperature

method

procedure

The non-linear

adopted

The method

using

governing

estimation

upon

on the theory

parameters

and arriving

is nor-

values

limits.

on the parameter

A good

estimation

non-linear

in the estimation

estimation

method

In the present

case

duct is a function of Bi, R between

the measured

temperature

meter

and theoretical

with respect

in least squares

sense

of the pro-

~*, the deviation

at different locations

to be minimized

of

in [19-22].

and

values

F

of the

in the product

to the physical

It could be observed

from

limit of integration

becomes

Eq. (14) that the upper a constant

The derivative

once

c~0 and

of Eq. (14) with re-

spect to Bi and

is given in [18]

as the temperature

c/0T/r02 9

~z are specified.

The use of the

of food products

and for those of solid materials

9 ~=

at the final values

[17].

properties

and

of the

is given by Pfal and Mitchell

thermal

2

+ = C~O TZ /r 0 ~'Z

the process.

of least squares

within specified

state of the art paper

where

pro-

consuming

a set of initial guess

of these parameters

obtained

method

to hasten

(14)

n=l 0

a trial and error

and time

in such cases

is based

for iterating

are

with the theoretical

will be a combersome

process. mally

the experimentally

curves

files. This matching

considered

e* are then equated to zero and the z correction ABi and A~* to be applied to the paraz meters are evaluated [14]. A computer programme is developed

to evaluate

tions [14].

It is observed

the above

scheme

are sufficient to satisfy the required given by the following

of calcula-

that about 6-8 iterations accuracy

criteria

expressions:

is

I ABi/Bi[ ~ 0.00001

para-

and is written as follows:

and x

@ Tz

(12)

f [Tn(~*)-Te,n(~*)]2dT* n=l 0

F(Bi,~*) =z. ~

IA T@/ z/~zl@ 40.00001 if the initial estimates ues.

where

Thermal

conductivity

are evaluated

Tz@ = ~ T z / r ~ "

from

and thermal

the final corrected

of the Eq. (12) with respect

Bi and

~*z when equated

taneous

equations

to zero

to be solved

to

will yield two simul-

for obtaining

to be applied to the initial guess

the cor-

values

of Bi

and

diffusivity values

temperature Figure

data are used

8 shows

in the same

the sequential

matching

process

It is observed

from

Table

I that for food models

for a given increment

is 70 to 88.5 per cent. These trends followthe

difficulty the following

value of ~. dimensionless

To overcome

this

ratio is intro-

[14] :

(13)

conductivity

with increase

in sugar

tern as observed who

have

ce0 is any reference

diffusivity value.

of Eq. (13) in (12) yields

Intro-

diffusivity decrease

content. content ( wet basis) considered

by Bakal

[23 ] and Keppler

determined

the thermal

uated for some

fresh fruits and vegetables

mentioned

properties

of the earlier transient

in the literature

fects are either minimized

eval~

are given experi-

the convection

or neglected

pat-

and Boose

solutions.

ments

The thermal

same

diffusivity val-

ues of sucrose

in Table 2. In most where

and thermal

The range of moisture

[24],

+ = -~0 -

for

a food model.

thermal

duction

of Bi

calculation.

~*. However, the numerical evaluation of the z derivative with respect to ~* offers some difficulty z as the upper limit of integration in Eq. (12) varies

duced

val-

and ~* values respectively. The non-linear estimaz tion method is quite accurate as all the transient

The partial derivative

rections

are close to the correct

ef-

and the mass

K. Badari Narayana

and M.V.

Krishna Murthy: Determination

1.0

No.

x,,,, !1 -'~_

".

of F o o d M a t e r i a l s

T a b l e 1. E f f e c t i v e t h e r m a l v a l u e s of f o o d m o d e l s

Composition: 100 water: 10sugoQ 3 agor Shape: 60.60.10 mm slab 9 or - - - surface o or - - - - centre

0.8

of T h e r m a l P r o p e r t i e s

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Experimental points

0.6

267

conductivity and diffusivity

Sugar content (grams)

k (W/Km)

10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0.820 0.812 0.810 0.789 0.768 0.765 0.756

~ x

10 7

(m2/s) 1.119 1.067 1.040 1.010 0.980 0.972 0.952

Size: 60• 10 m m , ti = 4 3 . 5 ~ td~= 1 9 . 5 ~ twb = 1 6 . 7 5 ~ cooling air velocity = 2.01 m/s, comp o s i t i o n : 100 g w a t e r , 3 g A g a r - a g a r , the sugar contents are tabulated

0.4 '5 Numeruls denote the iteration number l I 1 I I 02 0.4 E6 0.8 1.0

0.2 0

1.2

1.4

1.6

lowance

for mass

transfer at the product exposed

face during air precooling Fig. 8. Matching time-temperature

of the theoretical and experimental curves using least squares theory

ing equations

are presented.

with the associated

sur-

The govern-

nonlinear equations

are solved numerically. ii. Surface evaporation transfer effects are neglected. striction imposed mass

in the present

transfer effects at the product

cluded.

Thermal

periments

properties

which simulate

effect on the total heat transfer.

There is no such remethod

iii. Faster

and also the

from

actual processing

cooling rates for food products

dicted by the present

surface is in-

are evaluated

is found to have significant

model

tional forced convection

ex-

iv. Thermal

conditions.

properties

fruits and vegetables

compared

boundary

the non-linear

to the conven-

condition analysis.

of some

food models,

are evaluated by matching

theoretical and experimental estimation

are pre-

thermal

the

histories using

method.

7 Conclusions References i.

Mathematical

sient heat transfer

models

for the evaluation

in moist food products

of t r a n -

in the shape

of i n f i n i t e s l a b , i n f i n i t e c y l i n d e r a n d s p h e r e

with al-

Table 2. Effective thermal conductivity vegetables estimated during precooling

No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 II

Hayakawa, K.I. : Estimating Temperatures of Foods during various Heating or Cooling Treatments. New York: ASHRAE Journal 1972

and diffusivity values of fresh fruits and

Moisture content (per cent)

k

c~• I07

(~

Cooling air velocity (m/s)

(W/Km)

(m2/s)

19.0 18.4 20.3 20.0 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.1 19.0 18.5 17.0

1.40 1.38 1.38 1.55 1.50 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.50 1.38 1.38

86.0 75.8 86.5 85.8 93.3 82.2 92.1 89.7 84.5 94.2 90.4

1.376 0.890 1.837 0.958 1.615 1.074 1.450 2.130 1.878 1.390 0.860

1.037 0.891 1.271 1.836 1.103 0.725 1.134 1.586 1.182 0.958 1.796

ti

tdb

twb

(~

(~

43.75 49.00 46.00 45.75 47.50 43.00 45.00 46.25 48.50 43.50 48.00

22.0 21.4 22.5 23.0 22.2 21.5 21.4 21.4 21.5 20.2 19.6

Material

Apple Banana Beetroot Carrot Cucumber Mango Melon Papaya Potato Pumpkin Raddish

1.

268

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

W~rme-

Olson, F.C.W.~ Schultz, O.T.: Temperatures in solids during Heating and Cooling. Ind. Eng. Chem. 34 (1942) 874 Pflug, l.J.; Blaisdell, J.L.; Kopelman, J.: Developing Temperature-Time curves for Objects that can be Approximated by a Sphere, Infinite Plate or Infinite cylinder. Trans. ASHRAE. 71 (1965) 238 Pflug, I.J.~ Kopelman, I.J.: Correlating and Predicting Transient Heat Transfer Rates in Food Products. Comm. I.I.R. 2 (1966) 89 H ayakawa, K.I. ; Bakal, A. : New Computational Procedure for Determining the Apparent Thermal Diffusivity of a Solid Body Approximated with an Infinite slab. J. Food Science. 38 (1973) 623 Kopelman, I.J. ; Mizrahi, S. ; Kauffman, I. : Thermal Conductivity in Transient Cooling of Oranges. Comm. 2. I.I.R. (1973) 223 Heisler, M.P. : Temperature Charts for Induction and Constant Temperature Heating. Trans. ASME.

69 (1947) 227 8.

9. 10.

II.

12.

13. 14.

15.

16.

Gurnie, H. P. ~ Lurie, J. : Charts for E stimating Temperature Distribution in Heating and Cooling of solid shapes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15 (1923) 1170 Schneider, P.J. : Conduction Heat Transfer. Reading, Man. : Addison Wesley 1966 Dyner, H.~ Hesselchwerdt, A.L. : TemperatureTime Characteristics During Food Precooling. Trans. ASHRAE. 70 (1964) 249 Hodgson, T. : The Effect of Environmental Conditions on Chilling Rates of Meat. Bull. I.I.R. Annexe 1966-1 (1966) 635 Srinivasa Murthy, S. ; Krishna Murthy, M.V. ; Ramachandran, A. : Heat Transfer During Aircooling and Storing of Moist Food Products. Trans. ASAE. 17 (1974) 769 Stoecker, W.F. : Refrigeration and Air Conditioning. New York: McGraw Hill 1958 Badari Narayana, K. : Heat and Mass Transfer Studies and Evaluation of Thermal Properties of Food Products. Ph. D. Thesis, Ind. Inst. Technology, Madras 1976 Von Rosenberg, D.U. : Methods for the Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations. New York: Elsevier 1969 ASHRAE Guide and Data Book (Applications). New York: ASHRAE 1971

und Stofffibertragung

12 (1979)

17. Pfal, R.C.; Mitchel, B.T.: A General Method for Simultaneous Measurement of Thermal Properties. AIAA PaperNo. 69 (1969) 602 18. Hundtoft, E.B. ; Wu, S.M. : Determining Specific Gravity of Alfalfa Solids by Nonlinear Least Squares Method. Trans. ASAE. 13 (1970)181 19. Beck, J.V. : Calculation of Thermal Diffusivity from Temperature Measurements. Trans. ASME. J. of Heat Transfer. 85 (1963) 181 20. Beck, J.V. : Transient Determination of Thermal Properties. Nuclear Eng. Design. 3 (1966) 373 21. Pfal, R.C. : Nonlinear Least Squares: A Method for Simultaneous Thermal Property Determination in Ablating Polymeric Materials. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. I0 (1966) I111 22. Clark, B.L. : A Parametric Study of the Transient Ablation. Trans. ASME. J. of Heat Transfer. 94 (1972) 347 23. Bakal, A.I. : Conduction Heat Transfer with Phase Change and Its Application to Freezing or Thawing of Foods. Ph. D. Thesis, Rutgers State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 1970 24. Keppeler, R.A.~ Boose, J.R.: Thermal Properties of Frozen Sucrose Solutions. Trans. ASAE. 13 (1970) 335

Dr. K. Badari Narayana Prof. Dr. M.V. Krishna Murthy ~ Refrigeration and Airconditioning Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras-600 036, India Present

address"

Institut ffir W~irmetechnik und Thermodynamik Univer sittit Stuttgart Pfaffenwaldring b D-7000 Stuttgart-Vaihingen Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Received

February

21~ 1979