Deterministic error correction for nonlocal spatial

www.nature.com/scientificreports

OPEN

received: 12 October 2015 accepted: 30 December 2015 Published: 10 February 2016

Deterministic error correction for nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement Tao Li1, Guan-Yu Wang2, Fu-Guo Deng2 & Gui-Lu Long1,3,4 Hyperentanglement is an effective quantum source for quantum communication network due to its high capacity, low loss rate, and its unusual character in teleportation of quantum particle fully. Here we present a deterministic error-correction scheme for nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentangled photon pairs over collective-noise channels. In our scheme, the spatial-polarization hyperentanglement is first encoded into a spatial-defined time-bin entanglement with identical polarization before it is transmitted over collective-noise channels, which leads to the error rejection of the spatial entanglement during the transmission. The polarization noise affecting the polarization entanglement can be corrected with a proper one-step decoding procedure. The two parties in quantum communication can, in principle, obtain a nonlocal maximally entangled spatial-polarization hyperentanglement in a deterministic way, which makes our protocol more convenient than others in long-distance quantum communication. Quantum entanglement is an important resource for quantum computation and quantum communication. The ability of entanglement creation between distant locations is usually a prerequisite for quantum communication, such as quantum teleportation1, quantum dense coding (QDC)2,3, quantum key distribution4,5, quantum secret sharing6, quantum secure direct communication7–10, and quantum imaging11. However, the direct distribution of quantum entanglement over an optical-fiber channel without any protection will inevitably make the entanglement suffer from the channel noise, which results in its degradation4,12. To mitigate the channel noise and implement quantum communication securely between distant parties, several useful methods have been presented13–19, such as quantum error correct code (QECC)13, quantum error-rejection code (QERC)14,15, and decoherence free subspace (DFS)16–19. The ideal redundant encoding of QECC is essentially the same as the classical one, where one logical qubit is encoded by several physical qubits according to the type of the noise, and the correction procedure can be performed after error detecting13. The QERC and DFS are two effective methods to suppress the collective error noise during the photon propagation14–19. By picking out the photon in a deterministic time slot, both the two-photon QERC and the single-photon QERC can correct the polarization noise during the photon propagation with proper encoding and decoding procedures, and provide the parties a faithful channel with two fiber channels in a probabilistic way14,15. Entanglement purification is an important passive way to improve the fidelity of nonlocal entangled quantum systems polluted by the quantum channel noise, and it is of vital importance when it is combined with quantum entanglement swapping to implement the quantum repeater network20–22. The first entanglement purification protocol (EPP) was proposed in 1996 by Bennett et al.23 with controlled-not (CNOT) gates for the nonlocal quantum systems entangled in one degree of freedom (DOF). Subsequently, Bennett et al.24 showed that EPP is deeply connected to QECC, especially that the EPP involving classical communication is in principle equivalent to QECC. In the EPP, the two-qubit operations, i.e., CNOT operation or parity-check operation are exploited to detect the errors and the feedback operations along with the measurement on the auxiliary systems result in the error correction. In 2001, Pan et al.25 introduced a convenient EPP for polarization entanglement from an ideal entanglement source resorting to linear optical elements. In 2002, Simon and Pan26 developed an EPP with linear optical elements for the currently available parametric down-conversion source, and took the 1 State Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Physics and Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. 2Department of Physics, Applied Optics Beijing Area Major Laboratory, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. 3Tsinghua National Laboratory of Information Science and Technology, Beijing 100084, China. 4Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100084, China. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.-L.L. (email: [email protected])

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

1

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ spatial entanglement as a resource to purify the polarization entanglement when the bit-flip error correction was needed27. In 2008, Sheng et al.28 developed an EPP using deterministic quantum non-demolition detection (QND) with cross-Kerr nonlinearity and it could be used to implement multi-step purification for mixed polarized entangled systems. In 2014, Li, Yang, and Deng29 designed a high-efficiency EPP for atomic ensembles. The EPPs described above can be considered as a hierarchical error correction for the polarization errors, and they consume largely the less entangled quantum systems. Entanglement purification23–30 makes great progress when the concept of deterministic entanglement purification was introduced originally by Sheng and Deng31 in 2010. The polarization errors can be corrected with the error-free entanglement of the photon pair itself in another one or two DOFs, and each photon pair purified is in the maximally entangled state in the polarization DOF with a unity efficiency. In the first deterministic entanglement purification protocol (DEPP)31, the hyperentanglement32 in both the spatial DOF and the frequency DOF was exploited to purify the polarization entanglement and a two-step error correction for the bit-flip error and the phase-flip error was presented. Subsequently, Sheng et al.33 and Li34 proposed two similar one-step DEPPs independently with linear optical elements. The polarization errors are deterministically converted into the ambiguity of the spatial modes of the photons when the proper feedback operations are involved. In 2011, Deng35 introduced a general one-step error correction for multipartite polarization entanglement and pointed out the equivalence between the auxiliary spatial entanglement and frequency entanglement. Moreover, he showed that a DEPP does not require the photon systems entangled in the polarization DOF, but one error-free DOF. These DEPPs can purify the polarization entanglement with one step and the polarization errors are totally converted into the ambiguity of spatial modes when the two photons in each pair are originally entangled in spatial DOF which has been exploited to generation a (100 ×  100)-dimensional entanglement36. Compared with the conventional EPPs23,25–29, these one-step DEPPs33–35 reduce the requirement on the interference coherence in time of the two photons from two pairs, which makes them feasible in practical quantum repeaters. Recently, some interesting DEPPs are presented, such as the DEPP with the time-bin entanglement37 and the DEPP resorting to QND and spatial entanglement38, which is used to perform a secure double-server blind quantum computation. Besides, Wang et al.39 introduced a heralded hyperdistillation scheme with linear optical elements. Zhou and Sheng presented a recyclable amplification protocol40 for the single-photon entangled state assisted by QND, which could increase the success probability of the single photon transmission and be quite useful in quantum network. Hyperentanglement, the entanglement in multiple DOFs of a quantum system41–44, has attracted much attention as it has some important applications in quantum communication, such as hyperentanglement-assisted linear Bell-state analyzing45, the “All-Versus-Nothing” proof of Bell's theorem46, the efficient QDC47,48, hyperentangled Bell-state analysis49–52, the quantum teleportation of multiple DOFs of a quantum particle53, and hyperentanglement swapping50,51. Hyperentanglement purification attracts much attention recently, and some interesting hyperentanglement purification protocols (HEPP) are introduced. In 2013, Ren et al.54 firstly presented an HEPP for spatial-polarization hyperentangled photonic systems with two individual quantum non-demolition parity-check detectors for both the spatial DOF and the polarization DOF assisted by diamond nitrogen-vacancy centers embedded in photonic crystal microcavities. Subsequently, Ren and Deng55 proposed a high-efficiency two-step HEPP with quantum-state joining method, and the original states discarded with a poorer fidelity in either the spatial DOF or the polarization DOF were recycled to perform the quantum-state joining procedure, leading to a high efficiency. Recently, Wang et al.56 introduced a one-step HEPP with linear optics. The quantum non-demolition parity-check measurements for the spatial DOF and the polarization DOF could be completed simultaneously in a heralded way when local multi-photon entanglement was available57. In this paper, we propose an efficient deterministic error correction for spatial-polarization hyperentanglement of nonlocal photonic systems assisted by the time-bin entanglement58,59. When the maximal time delay between each two time-bins is small, compared to the variation of the fluctuation and birefringence of the fiber, the photons in each time-bin will suffer an identical polarization noise, which is referred to as the collective error model14–19. The parties in quantum communication first encode the spatial-polarization hyperentanglement into spatially defined time-bin entanglement. When the photons propagate along the fiber channels, the fluctuation of fiber only results in a global phase and the noise leading to spatial errors can be rejected. Meanwhile, the birefringence of the fiber will inevitably introduce a polarization error, i.e., the bit-flip error or the phase-flip error14–19. The parties finally perform a faithful one-step decoding procedure to complete the error correction, and they can obtain a maximal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement of photonic systems as the hyperentanglement concentration does60–63. Moreover, our error-correction protocol works in a deterministic way, the same as the DEPPs for the polarization entanglement only31,33–35,37,38, and the success probability is 100% in principle. The protocol is based on linear optical elements and the well developed fast Pockels cells (PCs) or widely used fiber polarization controller64. It is, therefore, in reach of experimental implementation and it has good applications in the practical quantum network.

Results

Time-bin encoding and the collective noise channel.  Suppose there is a hyperentanglement source

located at the middle of two parties in quantum communication, say Alice and Bob, and it generates photon pairs hyperentangled in both the spatial and polarization DOFs41–43: Ψ

AB

= χ+

AB

φ+

AB

=

1 ( a1 b1 + a2 b2 )( H H + V V )AB . 2

(1)

Here the subscripts A and B are used to discriminate the photons sent to the two remote parties in quantum com1 ( a1 b1 ± a2 b2 ) are used to denote the spatial Bell munication, say Alice and Bob, respectively. χ ± AB = 2 1 ± 1 ± states of the photon pair AB. φ = ( H V ± V H ) are = ( H H ± V V ) and ψ AB

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

2

AB

AB

2

AB

2

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 1.  Schematic diagram for the time-bin entanglement encoding in nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement distribution. PBSi (i = 1, 2, ) represents a polarizing beam splitter that transmits the horizonal photons H and reflects the vertical polarized photons V . PCi stands for a Pockels cell which completes a polarization bit-flip operation H ↔ V on the photon passing through when it is activated. used to denote their polarized Bell states. H and V represent the horizontal and vertical polarizations of photons, respectively. a1 and a2 (b1 and b2) represent the two spatial modes of the photon A (B) sent to Alice (Bob). Before launching the photons AB into the fiber channels, the parties perform a time-bin encoding procedure and transform the spatial-polarization hyperentanglement into a spatial defined time-bin entanglement with H H polarization using our encoder shown in Fig. 1. This encoder is composed of some unbalanced polarizing interferometers and PCs which implement the bit-flip operation H ↔ V when they are activated. It will introduce a time delay t on the V component of the photon when it passes through an interferometer, since H is transmitted by the polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and propagates along the short arm, while V is reflected by the PBS and passes through the long arm. After the photons passes through the unbalanced polarizing interferometers, the parties apply the time-dependent polarization-flip operations to make the upper modes a1 and b1 in V polarization and the down modes a 2 and b 2 in H polarization, i.e., effecting the transformation a1 b1 H A H B  a1 b1 V A V B and a2 b2 V A V B  a2 b2 H A H B. Besides, an optical delay t′  much longer than the time delay t introduced by the interferometers is applied on the a1 and b1 spatial modes. The state of the photons AB evolves into Ψ

AB1

=

1 [D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D (t ′ + t)A D (t ′ + t)B ] a1 b1 V 2

{

+ [D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] a2 b2 H

A

H

B

A

V

B

}.

(2)

Here Di(t) (i = A , B) is a linear time-delay operator which implements a time delay on the photon i, and it satisfies the following relations: I = D i (0), †

D i (−t) = D i (t), D i (t + t ′) = D i (t) D i (t ′), D i (t) D i (t ′) = D i (t ′) D i (t).

(3)

Now, the polarization DOF of the photons AB are entangled with their spatial modes, and time-bins with different time delays can be used to discriminate the particular spatial and polarization components of the original hyperentanglement when the spatial and polarization information has been erased. To get the spatial defined time-bin entanglement with the polarization H A H B, the a1 and a2 (b1 and b2) components are combined together at PBS5 (PBS5′ ) and the V A V B polarized components labeled with the time delay D A (t ′) D B (t ′) or D (t ′ + t)A D (t ′ + t)B can be transformed into H A H B with some polarization-flip operations at the corresponding time slots. The photons launched into the fiber channels are in the state: Ψ

AB 2

=

{

}

1 [D (t ′ + t)AD (t ′ + t)B + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] |a〉|b〉|H 〉A |H 〉B . 2

(4)

Notice that the dominant noise affecting the photons propagating through fiber channels is the collective noise as long as the photons travel inside a small time window, compared to the fluctuation of the optical path and the variation of the birefringence, the transformations on each time-bin component of a single photon are also the same as each other14–19. After a pair of photons AB pass through the noise channel, up to a global phase, the state of the photons is then described as: ρc = ρS ⊗ ρP ⊗ ρT ,

(5)

where ρ S = a b b a represents the spatial mode, ρ P = α φ+ φ+ + β ψ+ ψ+ + γ φ− φ− + δ ψ− ψ− w i t h α + β + γ + δ = 1 d e n o t e s t h e p o l a r i z a t i o n m o d e , ρT = ξT ξT w i t h

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

3

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 2.  Schematic diagram for error correction decoding in nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement distribution. Encoder represents the time-bin encoding setup that transforms the spatialpolarization hyperentanglement into the time-bin entanglement.

1 ξT = 2 [D (t ′ + t)A D (t ′ + t)B + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] vac is the time-bin mode, and the vacuum state vac corresponds to the time-bin one without any time delay. In a different notation, the two photons AB in the mixed state ρc are composed of four pure states and could be written as

ρc′ = α Ψ10

AB

Ψ10 + β Ψ 20

AB

Ψ 20 + γ Ψ 30

AB

Ψ 30 + δ Ψ 04

AB

Ψ 04

(6)

with Ψ10 Ψ 20 Ψ 30 Ψ 04

AB AB AB AB

= ξT a b φ+ , = ξT a b ψ + , = ξT a b φ− , = ξT a b ψ− ,

(7)

and the corresponding probabilities that photons AB are projected into Ψ10 AB, Ψ 20 AB, Ψ 30 AB, and Ψ 04 AB are α, β, γ, and δ, respectively. One can easily find that there are three kinds of errors in the polarization DOF of the mixed state ρc′, i.e., the bit-flip error case Ψ 20 AB, the phase-flip error case Ψ 30 AB, and the case with both phase-flip and bit-flip errors Ψ 04 AB. In the following section, we will detail how the distant parties can obtain the error-free photon pairs maximally hyperentangled in both spatial DOF and polarization DOF from the mixed state ρc′ shown in Eq. (6). No matter which types of errors take place, the parties can perform the error correction procedure in a deterministic way and transfer the polarization error into time-bin ambiguity in the one-step error-correction decoding procedure, leaving the photon pairs in the state Ψ AB that is maximally entangled in both spatial DOF and polarization DOF.

One-step error-correction decoding for nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement.  The

principle of our one-step error-correction decoding procedure for nonlocal hyperentanglement distribution is shown in Fig. 2. Each decoder is made up of unbalanced interferometers and PCs. To demonstrate the validity a n d r e l i a b i l i t y o f t h e d e c o d i n g p r o c e d u r e , w e f i r s t d i s c u s s t h e c a s e t h at p h o t o n s 1 AB are in the state Ψ10 = 2 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] a b φ+ AB , AB and t he n we w i l l d e t ai l w hat t he d e c o d i ng pro c e du re for Ψ10 AB w i l l d o for t he c as e 1 Ψ 20 AB = 2 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] a b ψ+ AB where a bit-flip error takes place, and give out the photonic states evolving with the same decoding procedure when the other two types of errors take place. For the case that photons AB are in the state Ψ10 AB, after passing through the first unbalanced interferometer made up of PBS6 and PBS7 (PBS6′ and PBS7′), the photon A (B) with the vertical polarization V A ( V ) is delayed B by an optical delay t represented by applying an operator D A (t) (D B (t) ) on it. The state of AB evolves into

{

}

{

Ψ11

}

AB

1 {[D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) 2 2 + I AI B] a b H A H B + [D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t)

=

+ D A (2t) D B (2t) + D A (t) D B (t) ] a b V

A

V B }.

(8)

Second, the parties perform a bit-flip operation on the polarization DOF of AB when they arrive at the time slots with the time delay t or t +  t′ . And then, the parties introduce an optical delay t on the photon A (B) with the horizonal polarization H A ( H ) by using a longer optical path in the transmission mode of PBS8 (PBS8′ ). The B state of the photons AB is transformed into a polarization-time-bin hyperentangled one Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

4

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Ψ12

=

AB

1 2 2

[D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (2t) D B (2t)

+ D A (t) D B (t) ] a b

(H A H B +

V

V

A

B

).

(9)

By far, the spatial DOF of AB is kept in the product state a b and it does not suffer from the collective noise. To recover the spatial-polarization hyperentanglement, the parties activate the polarization-flip operations when the scheduled photons with the time delays t′  +  t and t′  +  2t arrive. The photons at the outputs of PBS9 and PBS9′ are in a hybrid spatial-polarization-time-bin hyperentangled state that can be described as: Ψ13

AB

=

1 2 2

{[D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) ] a1 b1

+ [D A (2t) D B (2t) + D A (t) D B (t) ] a2 b2 } ( H

A

H

B

+ V

A

V

B

).

(10)

Ψ13 AB

To disentangle spatial-time-bin entanglement in the state and remove the time-bin difference on the spatial modes a1b1 and a2b2, one can apply an optical delay of the scale t′  on the spatial modes a2b2 with the delay operator D A (t ′) D B (t ′), and the final photon pair AB shared by Alice and Bob is in the spatial-polarization hyperentangled state: Ψ14

AB

=

1 [D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) ] χ+ φ+ , 2

(11)

where the photons can occupy the time slot with the optical delay D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) vac or D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) vac . For the case that a bit-flip error takes place on the polarization entangled DOF Ψ 20 AB = 1 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′) D B (t ′) + D A (t) D B (t) + I AI B] a b ψ+ AB , with the same decoding pro2 cedure as that discussed above, the two parties in quantum communication will also obtain the maximally spatial-polarization hyperentangled state. The evolution of the photon pair system in this situation can be detailed in a similar way. First, with the optical delay t on the vertical polarized component V A ( V ) shown in Fig. 2, Ψ0 2AB is proB jected into

{

}

Ψ12

AB

1

{[D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t) D B (2t) 2 2 + I AD B (t) ] a b H A V B + [D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′)

=

+ D A (2t) D B (t) + D A (t) I B] a b V

A

H B }.

(12)

Second, Alice and Bob complete the bit-flip operation H A ↔ V A and H B ↔ V B on the components with the scheduled delay t or t +  t′  of A and B, respectively. And then, with the optical delay t on H A (|H B ), the photon system will also be transformed into a polarization-time-bin hyperentanglement of the following form: Ψ 22

AB

=

1 [D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (2t) D B (t) 2 2

+ D A (2t) D B (t) ] a b

(H A H B +

V

A

V

B

).

(13)

The photons are then scheduled to suffer from the bit-flip operation on the polarization DOF when they are in the components of the time delay t′  +  t or t′  +  2t. The photons AB emitting from PBS9 and PBS9′ evolve into another hybrid spatial-polarization-time-bin hyperentangled state: Ψ 23

AB

=

1 {[D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + t) + D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + 2t) ] a1 b1 2 2

+ [D A (2t) D B (t) + D A (t) D B (2t) ] a2 b2 } ( H

A

H

B

+ V

A

V

B

).

(14)

Finally, with the optical delay of t′  on the spatial modes a2b2 with the delay operator D A (t ′) D B (t ′), the two parties will also disentangle the spatial-time-bin entanglement in the state Ψ 23 AB and project the photon pair AB into the desired spatial-polarization hyperentangled state: Ψ 24

AB

=

1 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + 2t) + D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + t) ] χ+ φ+ . 2

(15)

Here the time-bin slots that the parties can obtain the spatial-polarization hyperentanglement are different for the photon A and the photon B in Ψ 24 AB, and it can be viewed as a bit-flip error on the time-bin entangled DOF, compared with that in Ψ14 AB. As for the other two cases with the phase-flip error Ψ 30 AB, and both the phase-flip error and bit-flip error 4 Ψ 0 AB, the parties will also obtain the desired spatial-polarization hyperentangled state Ψ AB = χ+ φ+ by Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

5

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ using our error-correction decoding procedure described above, and the final hyperentangled states taking the time-bin information into account for the cases Ψ 30 AB and Ψ 04 AB are, respectively, Ψ 34

AB

Ψ 44

AB

=

1 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + t) − D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + 2t) ] χ+ φ+ . 2

(16)

=

1 [D A (t ′ + t) D B (t ′ + 2t) − D A (t ′ + 2t) D B (t ′ + t) ] χ+ φ+ . 2

(17)

and

The corresponding polarization errors are simultaneously corrected faithfully, since they are totally transferred into the time-bin errors of the photons AB. No matter what time-bins the photons occupy, they are all in the desired spatial-polarization hyperentangled state Ψ AB = χ+ φ+ .

Discussion

By far, we have detailed our deterministic error correction protocol for nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement distribution of two-photon systems. Our method relies on the spatial-polarization and time-bin encoding of photons. Recent experiments have demonstrated that the time-bin encoding is a particularly robust photon qubit under the collective noise channels when the fiber channels are involved65–68. The distribution of time-bin entanglement at the scale of 50 km optical fiber was implemented and the photons after propagation still violate the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell inequality by more than 15 standard deviations without removing the detector noise69. Recently, the faithful distribution of time-bin entangled photon pairs over 300 km of fiber has been implemented70 and it confirms the reliability of the time-bin encoding of photon qubits14,15. Therefore, with the time-bin encoding, the parties in quantum communication can complete a spatial error-rejecting hyperentanglement distribution, while the polarization error can be completely corrected with a simple one-step error-correction decoding procedure. Different from the interesting HEPPs54–57 in which the parties in quantum communication depress the noise in a passive way, our positive deterministic error correction for the hyperentangled photons works in an active way for collective noise and it enjoys the following advantages. The polarization errors, in our protocol, can be corrected in a deterministic way, since they are completely transferred into the time-bin errors leaving the spatial mode an additional DOF for photon qubit encoding. We can perform a deterministic error correction for the spatial-polarization entanglement of photon systems after they are transmitted over the noisy channels. The non-demolition parity-checking measurements as a result of cavity quantum electrodynamics or the interference assisted by local entanglement in the previous HEPPs are unnecessary in the present protocol. In other words, we can in principle distil a pair of maximally spatial-polarization hyperentangled photons from a single hyperentangled photon pair polluted by the noisy channels. Besides, our protocol does not consume largely the less-entangled systems as that in the positive entanglement distillation protocols, where the fidelity of the less-entangled systems are improved by repeating the purification procedures23–28. The deterministic performance of our scheme comes from the conversion between the errors in polarization DOF and the ambiguity of the time-bin DOF. Fortunately, the minor time-bin ambiguity in the spatial-polarization hyperentangled photons can be eliminated automatically when performing entanglement swapping with the hyperentangled Bell-state analysis based on cavity quantum electrodynamics50–52. Since the scale of the time-bin ambiguity of the photons is smaller than the coherence time of the assisted stationary qubit, i.e., quantum dot (QD)50,51 or NV centers52, used to perform the swapping procedure, and only the spatial DOF and polarization DOF of the photons will affect the stable photonic output state of the cavity containing the stationary qubit71–73. The outcomes of the photon detection will herald the success of the swapping procedure and can project the remaining two photons in the desired spatial-polarization hyperentangled state Ψ AB up to some local single qubit operations50–52. Meanwhile, the time-bin ambiguity of the photons can also be eliminated by the quantum memory devices involved in the quantum repeater network74–77. In summary, we have presented an efficient deterministic error-correction protocol for spatial-polarization hyperentanglement distribution over collective-noise channels. By exploiting the robust time-bin entanglement, the parties in quantum communication can obtain a maximal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement. The polarization errors are totally converted into the time-bin errors, while the spatial errors can be rejected inherently as only one fiber channel is involved for each photon. Combined with the hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis49–53 and the quantum memory for hyperentangled photon pairs74–77, the present protocol can be utilized to perform a high-efficiency quantum repeater of multiple DOFs78. It can also be easily extended to the case for the multipartite hyperentanglement, and it will constitute an important building block for quantum communication and computation networks.

References

1. Bennett, C. H. et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993). 2. Bennett, C. H. & Wiesner, S. J. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881–2884 (1992). 3. Liu, X. S., Long, G. L., Tong, D. M. & Li, F. General scheme for superdense coding between multiparties. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022304 (2002). 4. Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145–195 (2002). 5. Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663 (1991). 6. Hillery, M., Bužek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829–1834 (1999). 7. Long, G. L. & Liu, X. S. Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032302 (2002).

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

6

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 8. Deng, F. G., Long, G. L. & Liu, X. S. Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair block. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042317 (2003). 9. Li, X. H. Quantum secure direct communication. Acta Phys. Sin. 64, 0160307 (2015). 10. Zheng, C. & Long, G. F. Quantum secure direct dialogue using Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 1238–1243 (2014). 11. Chen, L. X., Lei, J. J. & Romero, J. Quantum digital spiral imaging. Light: Sci. Appl. 3, e153 (2014). 12. Cao, Y. D. et al. Multiuser-to-multiuser entanglement distribution based on 1550 nm polarization-entangled photons, Sci. Bull. 60, 1128–1132 (2015). 13. Lidar, D. A. & Brun, T. A. Quantum Error Correction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013). 14. Yamamoto, T., Shimamura, J., Ödemir, Ş. K., Koashi, M. & Imoto, N. Faithful qubit distribution assisted by one additional qubit ution assisted by one additional qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040503 (2005). 15. Li, X. H., Deng, F. G. & Zhou, H. Y. Faithful qubit transmission against collective noise without ancillary qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 144101 (2007). 16. Walton, Z. D., Abouraddy, A. F., Sergienko, A. V., Saleh, B. E. A. & Teich, M. C. Decoherence-free subspaces in quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 087901 (2003). 17. Boileau, J. C., Gottesman, D., Laflamme, R., Poulin, D. & Spekkens, R. W. Robust polarization-based quantum key distribution over a collective-noise channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 017901 (2004). 18. Boileau, J. C., Laflamme, R., Laforest, M. & Myers, C. R. Robust quantum communication using a polarization-entangled photon pair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 220501 (2004). 19. Li, X. H., Deng, F. G. & Zhou, H. Y. Efficient quantum key distribution over a collective noise channel. Phys. Rev. A 78, 022321 (2008). 20. Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998). 21. Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008). 22. Chen, X., Wang, H. M., Ji, D. T., Mu, L. Z. & Fan, H. Expected number of quantum channels in quantum networks. Sci. Rep. 5, 12128 (2015). 23. Bennett, C. H. et al. Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722–725 (1996). 24. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A. & Wootters, W. K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824–3851 (1996). 25. Pan, J. W., Simon, C., Brukner, Č. & Zellinger, A. Entanglement purification for quantum communication. Nature 410, 1067–1070 (2001). 26. Simon, C. & Pan, J. W. Polarization entanglement purification using spatial entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 257901 (2002). 27. Pan, J. W., Gasparoni, S., Ursin, R., Weihs, G. & Zellinger, A. Experimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states. Nature 423, 417–422 (2003). 28. Sheng, Y. B., Deng, F. G. & Zhou, H. Y. Efficient polarization-entanglement purification based on parametric down-conversion sources with cross-Kerr nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042308 (2008). 29. Li, T., Yang, G. J. & Deng, F. G. Entanglement distillation for quantum communication network with atomic-ensemble memories. Opt. Express 22, 23897–23911 (2014). 30. Sheng, Y. B., Pan, J., Guo, R., Zhou, L. & Wang, L. Efficient N-particle W state concentration with different parity check gates. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 58, 060301 (2015). 31. Sheng, Y. B. & Deng, F. G. Deterministic entanglement purification and complete nonlocal Bell-state analysis with hyperentanglement. Phys. Rev. A 81, 032307 (2010). 32. Kwiat, P. G. Hyper-entangled states. J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2173–2184 (1997). 33. Sheng, Y. B. & Deng, F. G. One-step deterministic polarization-entanglement purification using spatial entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 82, 044305 (2010). 34. Li, X. H. Deterministic polarization-entanglement purification using spatial entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 82, 044304 (2010). 35. Deng, F. G. One-step error correction for multipartite polarization entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062316 (2011). 36. Krenn, M. et al. Generation and confirmation of a (100 ×  100)-dimensional entangled quantum system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6243–6247 (2014). 37. Sheng, Y. B. & Zhou, L. Deterministic polarization entanglement purification using time-bin entanglement. Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 085203 (2014). 38. Sheng, Y. B. & Zhou, L. Deterministic entanglement distillation for secure double-server blind quantum computation. Sci. Rep. 5, 7815 (2015). 39. Wang, T. J., Cao, C. & Wang, C. Linear-optical implementation of hyperdistillation from photon loss. Phys. Rev. A 89, 052303 (2014). 40. Zhou, L. & Sheng, Y. B. Recyclable amplification protocol for the single-photon entangled state. Laser Phys. Lett. 12, 045203 (2015). 41. Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005). 42. Barbieri, M., Cinelli, C., Mataloni, P. & De Martini, F. Polarization-momentum hyperentangled states: Realization and characterization. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052110 (2005). 43. Vallone, G., Ceccarelli, R., De Martini, F. & Mataloni, P. Hyperentanglement of two photons in three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. A 79, 030301(R) (2009). 44. Ren, B. C. & Deng, F. G. Hyper-parallel photonic quantum computation and manipulation on hyperentangled states. Acta Phys. Sin. 64, 160303 (2015). 45. Walborn, S., Pádua, S. & Monken, C. Hyperentanglement-assisted Bell-state analysis. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042313 (2003). 46. Cabello, A. Stronger two-observer All-Versus-Nothing violation of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210401 (2005). 47. Barreiro, J. T., Wei, T. C. & Kwiat, P. G. Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding. Nature Phys. 4, 282–286 (2008). 48. Wang, C., Xiao, L., Wang, W. Y., Zhang, G. Y. & Long, G. L. Quantum key distribution using polarization and frequency hyperentangled photons. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 26, 2072–2076 (2009). 49. Sheng, Y. B., Deng, F. G. & Long, G. L. Complete hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032318 (2010). 50. Ren, B. C., Wei, H. R., Hua, M., Li, T. & Deng, F. G. Complete hyperentangled-Bell-state analysis for photon systems assisted by quantum-dot spins in optical microcavities. Opt. Express 20, 24664–24677 (2012). 51. Wang, T. J., Lu, Y. & Long, G. L. Generation and complete analysis of the hyperentangled Bell state for photons assisted by quantumdot spins in optical microcavities. Phys. Rev. A 86, 042337 (2012). 52. Liu, Q. & Zhang, M. Generation and complete nondestructive analysis of hyperentanglement assisted by nitrogen-vacancy centers in resonators. Phys. Rev. A 91, 062321 (2015). 53. Wang, X. L. et al. Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature 518, 516–519 (2015). 54. Ren, B. C. & Deng, F. G. Hyperentanglement purification and concentration assisted by diamond NV centers inside photonic crystal cavities. Laser Phys. Lett. 10, 115201 (2013)

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

7

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ 55. Ren, B. C., Du, F. F. & Deng, F. G. Two-step hyperentanglement purification with the quantum-state-joining method. Phys. Rev. A 90, 052309 (2014). 56. Wang, T. J., Liu, L. L., Zhang, R., Cao, C. & Wang, C. One-step hyperentanglement purification and hyperdistillation with linear optics. Opt. Express 23, 9284–9294 (2015). 57. Mi, S. C., Wang, C. & Wang, T. J. Hyperentanglement purification with linear optics assisted by W-states. Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 623–634 (2014). 58. Kalamidas, D. Linear optical scheme for error-free entanglement distribution and a quantum repeater. Phys. Rev. A 73, 054304 (2006). 59. Takesue, H. Entangling time-bin qubits with a switch. Phys. Rev. A 89, 062328 (2014). 60. Ren, B. C., Du, F. F. & Deng, F. G. Hyperentanglement concentration for two-photon four-qubit systems with linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 88, 012302 (2013). 61. Ren, B. C. & Long, G. L. General hyperentanglement concentration for photon systems assisted by quantum-dot spins inside optical microcavities. Opt. Express 22, 6547–6561 (2014). 62. Li, X. H. & Ghose, S. Hyperconcentration for multipartite entanglement via linear optics. Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 125201 (2014). 63. Li, X. H. & Ghose, S. Efficient hyperconcentration of nonlocal multipartite entanglement via the cross-Kerr nonlinearity. Opt. Express 23, 3550–3562 (2015). 64. Viciani, S., Lima, M., Bellini, M. & Caruso, F. Observation of noise-assisted transport in an all-optical cavity-based network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 083601 (2015). 65. Chen, T. Y. et al. Experimental quantum communication without a shared reference frame. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 150504 (2006). 66. Honjo, T. et al. Long-distance entanglement-based quantum key distribution over optical fiber. Opt. Express 16, 19118–19126 (2008). 67. Yamamoto, T., Hayashi, K., Oezdemir, S. K., Koashi, M. & Imoto, N. Robust photonic entanglement distribution by stateindependent encoding onto decoherence-free subspace. Nature Photon. 2, 488–491 (2008). 68. Ikuta, R. et al. Efficient decoherence-free entanglement distribution over lossy quantum channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110503 (2011). 69. Marcikic, I. et al. Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180502 (2004). 70. Inagaki, T., Matsuda, N., Tadanaga, O., Asobe, M. & Takesue, H. Entanglement distribution over 300 km of fiber. Opt. Express 21, 23241–23249 (2013). 71. Duan, L. M. & Kimble, H. J. Scalable photonic quantum computation through cavity-assisted interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127902 (2004). 72. An, J. H., Feng, M. & Oh, C. H. Quantum-information processing with a single photon by an input-output process with respect to low-Q cavities. Phys. Rev. A 79, 032303 (2009). 73. Hu, C. Y. & Rarity, J. G. Loss-resistant state teleportation and entanglement swapping using a quantum-dot spin in an optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115303 (2011). 74. Lvovsky, A. I., Sanders, B. C. & Tittel, W. Optical quantum memory. Nature Photon. 3, 706–714 (2009). 75. Jing, J. & Wu, L. A. Overview of quantum memory protection and adiabaticity induction by fast signal control. Sci. Bull. 60, 328–335 (2015). 76. Tiranov, A. et al. Storage of hyperentanglement in a solid-state quantum memory. Optica 2, 279–287 (2015). 77. Parigi, V. et al. Storage and retrieval of vector beams of light in a multiple-degree-of-freedom quantum memory. Nature Commun. 6, 7706 (2015). 78. Sangouard, N., Simon, C., de Riedmatten, H. & Gisin, N. Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33–80 (2011).

Acknowledgements

T.L. is supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2015M571011. F.G. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11174039 and 11474026, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. 2015KJJCA01. G.L. is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11175094 and 91221205, Fund of Key Laboratory 9140C75010215ZK65001, and the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant No 2015CB921002. G.L. is a member of the Center of Atomic and Molecular Nanosciences, Tsinghua University.

Author Contributions

T.L. and G.-Y.W. completed the calculation and prepared the figures. T.L., F.-G.D. and G.-L.L. wrote the main manuscript text. G.-L.L. supervised the whole project. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Additional Information

Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. How to cite this article: Li, T. et al. Deterministic error correction for nonlocal spatial-polarization hyperentanglement. Sci. Rep. 6, 20677; doi: 10.1038/srep20677 (2016). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Scientific Reports | 6:20677 | DOI: 10.1038/srep20677

8