Displacement time series of active slopes from time-lapse cameras

1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
images acquired from time-lapse cameras (TLC) and retrieve displacement time series over. 8 active slopes. The aim of this work is to maximize the information ...
1

Displacement time series of active slopes from time-lapse cameras

2

Andrea Manconi*, Franziska Glueer and Simon Loew

3

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Department of Earth Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland

4

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

5 6

Abstract

7

We propose a new algorithm based on Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to systematically process

8

images acquired from time-lapse cameras (TLC) and retrieve displacement time series over

9

active slopes. The aim of this work is to maximize the information obtainable from large datasets

10

of TLC digital images acquired with different light and meteorological conditions, and to retrieve

11

accurate information on the spatial and temporal evolution of surface deformation. We present

12

our approach along with an example of application to an unstable slope in the Swiss Alps, more

13

specifically in the Great Aletsch area, where glacier retreat has activated and/or reactivated

14

several slope processes. At this location, a webcam was used to monitor the evolution of rock

15

deformation towards a partial slope failure. We validate or results against ground based

16

measurements, and discuss advantages and limitations of our approach, as well as future

17

improvements.

1

18

1. Introduction

19

Measuring the spatial and temporal development of ground deformation is essential for the

20

analysis and interpretation of various geological and geophysical phenomena (Angeli et al.,

21

2000; Dermanis and Kotsakis, 2006; Dzurisin, 2006). Surface displacements can be retrieved

22

with different monitoring methods, ranging from field-based instruments to remote sensing, and

23

the choice of the appropriate methods and sensors depends on several factors, including

24

technical specifications and site-specific conditions (Manconi, 2016). In this context, optical

25

imagery acquired from different platforms (terrestrial, airborne, and space-borne) is beneficial

26

(Leprince et al., 2008). Digital images can be exploited to visually identify changes of the scene

27

occurring over time, but also to quantify the evolution of surface displacements. Moreover,

28

image processing can be used to pass from visual (qualitative) information to semi-quantitative

29

and/or quantitative assessment of deformation. Digital Image Correlation (DIC, known also as

30

pixel-offset or feature-tracking) is a suitable method to detect surface deformation at high spatial

31

and temporal resolutions. The implementation of DIC is very flexible, thus it can be applied to

32

data acquired form different platforms, as well as different sensors (such as optical,

33

multispectral, thermal, laser and also radar) on the Earth’s surface and also on other planets

34

(Bridges et al., 2012; Delbridge et al., 2016; Scambos et al., 1992; Singleton et al., 2014; Walter,

35

2011). Starting from the work of Scambos et al., 1992 measuring glacier velocities form satellite

36

imagery, DIC methods have been further developed and widely used to investigate other

37

phenomena such as earthquakes, active volcanoes, as well as unstable slopes (e.g., Manconi et

38

al., 2014; Manconi and Casu, 2012; Travelletti et al., 2012; Van Puymbroeck et al., 2000).

39

Moreover, recent advances allow us to analyze multitemporal imagery and retrieve displacement

40

time series from optical and radar satellite imagery (e.g., Casu et al., 2011; Stumpf et al., 2017).

41

Focusing on DIC analyses to retrieve deformation at unstable slopes, data obtained from

42

satellite and/or aerial imagery have spatial resolutions (i.e., usually meters to tens of meters)

43

often unsuitable to achieve reliable results in the target area. In addition, satellite sampling 2

44

frequencies (revisit times) conflict with the evolution of such processes, which may experience

45

surface velocity changes (accelerations) even within hours. For this reason, ground based time-

46

lapse cameras (TLC) are being extensively employed to monitor mountain environments and

47

achieve high spatial and temporal resolutions (Danielson and Sharp, 2013; Farinotti et al., 2010;

48

Giordan et al., 2016; Travelletti et al., 2012; Vernier et al., 2012). This proliferation in the use of

49

TLC in alpine areas reflects the increasing availability of reasonably priced but robust high

50

resolution photo and/or video cameras, as well as of storage volumes and data transmission

51

capabilities. The frequency of data acquisition can be relatively high, in the order of several

52

pictures every minute, or even several frames per second with webcams. However, a number of

53

problems have to be considered when dealing with TLC acquisition in mountain areas, as for

54

example the effects of light conditions, shadowing, and/or meteorological variables. Moreover,

55

when TLC data has to be used for DIC analyses, additional concerns might be related to data

56

selection, as well as to the definition of the appropriate algorithm to fully exploit the available

57

information. For this reason, straightforward and efficient retrieval of accurate displacement time

58

series in alpine areas using DIC on TLC data can be a difficult task.

59

Here we propose a new algorithm to select and process images acquired from TLC and monitor

60

active slope deformation. We present our methodology by applying the approach to a case study

61

located in the Swiss Alps, more specifically in the Great Aletsch Glacier area. There, several

62

sectors of the slopes adjacent to the recent tongue of the Great Aletsch Glacier have been

63

reactivated due to its retreat since the Little Ice Age (Kos et al., 2016). The paper is organized as

64

follows. We first introduce the area of investigation and the characteristics of the monitoring

65

framework. Then, we describe the steps from the raw data acquisition to the displacement time

66

series recovery. Finally, we discuss the results obtained, as well as the limitations of the current

67

implementation of the algorithm and its potential future improvement.

3

68

2. Area of study and monitoring system

69

The Great Aletsch Glacier is located in the Swiss Alps, and is currently the largest and longest

70

glacier in the European Alps. The Great Aletsch valley is characterized by steep slopes primarily

71

composed of crystalline rocks (mainly gneisses and granites of the Aare massif), which

72

underwent multiple cycles of glacier advancements and retreat (Grämiger et al., 2017). In the

73

vicinity of the glacier tongue (Figure 1a), the current deglaciation phase is progressively

74

exposing the rock mass to stress changes locally causing slope instabilities which might

75

eventually lead to failure. Surface deformation associated to slope instabilities in the Great

76

Aletsch valley has been recently recognized and measured with space borne and ground based

77

remote sensing methods (Kos et al., 2016; Strozzi et al., 2010). Since 2013, a geodetic

78

monitoring system has been deployed to study into detail reversible and irreversible deformation

79

of the rock slopes located in the vicinity of the glacier terminus. A combination of two Robotized

80

Total Stations (RTS) and GNSS systems provide high resolution information to investigate the

81

role of glacier cycles on the progressive degradation of the rock mass, as well as on the

82

evolution towards slope failure processes. For a detailed description of the geodetic monitoring

83

system we refer the reader to (Loew et al., 2017). Early in July 2015, local authorities have

84

recognized the progressive formation of tensile fractures in the area named Silbersand (see

85

photos in the Supplementary Material, S1), located on the southern slope of the Aletsch valley

86

and adjacent to the current (summer 2015) position of the glacier tongue. To support the local

87

authorities, the Mobotix M25 TLC camera (Figure 1b) was set to acquire images every hour over

88

the area showing instability signs (see Figure 2). In addition, to monitor the potential evolution of

89

surface displacements towards a slope failure, we have installed 3 reflectors to be measured

90

with the RTS (Figure 1c). The installation of more points was initially planned to gain more

91

information on the spatial extent of the active deformation; however, field access was limited due

92

to the slope steepness and surface instabilities. The acquisition of multitemporal optical imagery

93

was initially intended to perform visual interpretations of the potential evolution towards 4

94

catastrophic failure of the slope, which could partially or totally block the Massa river outflow and

95

eventually cause secondary hazards downslope. Subsequently, TLC imagery has been

96

considered to retrieve the evolution of surface deformation with DIC algorithms. In the following

97

we describe the steps applied from data acquisition to the generation of displacement time

98

series relevant to active portions of the Silbersand slope.

99

3. From TLC acquisitions to displacement time series

100

The selection of TLC sampling rate and picture resolution is usually a function of the available

101

power supply, as well as on the storage capacity (when data are saved on site), or the available

102

bandwidth for data transmission. In our case, data were acquired at the maximum picture

103

resolution available for the Mobotix M25 camera (2048x1536, i.e. 3Mpixel) and directly

104

transmitted hourly via GSM network to a remote server located in Zurich. We collected

105

continuously the pictures from July 8 to September 23, 2015, with few exceptions due to data

106

transmission problems in the periods July 20 – 23 (no data available), and August 03 – 15 (only

107

10% of pictures available). Due to this data loss, the final number of TLC raw pictures collected

108

was reduced of about 30% compared to the sampling specifications; however, this has not

109

affected the possibility to obtain valuable information over the whole time period.

110

3.1 Supervised selection of suitable TLC pictures

111

As mentioned in the introduction, the information obtained from a TLC installed in an open

112

environment is deeply affected by continuous changes in light conditions, which may result in

113

shadowing effects (cast shadows and/or indirect shadows), direct sunlight exposure, excess of

114

darkness early morning and/or late evening. If the monitoring period continues for several

115

months, light/shadowing conditions may vary also due to seasonal changes of sun angles.

116

Moreover, obstacles and/or variability of the atmosphere (clouds, fog, heavy rainfall, snowfall,

117

etc.) further reduce the amount of usable imagery. The selection of images suitable for DIC

118

analyses can be performed manually, in order to guarantee visibility of the target area, and verify 5

119

visually that lightning/shadowing properties are similar (Giordan et al., 2016). However, when the

120

dataset is very large, the manual selection becomes inconvenient. Moreover, manual selection is

121

suitable for back analyses, but not applicable in a context where near-real time monitoring

122

applications might be necessary.

123

Several algorithms were proposed to perform filtering/denoising of digital imagery (Dravida et al.,

124

1984), remove shadows (Fredembach and Finlayson, 2006), as well as to identify similarities

125

multitemporal acquisitions (Wang et al., 2005 and references therein). Here we implemented a

126

supervised approach to find images suitable for the subsequent DIC analyses. To this end, we

127

selected as reference image (master) one picture of the target area with good light conditions

128

(i.e., limited cast shadows) and free of atmospheric problems. For this image (hereafter called

129

master), we defined a characteristic function (CFM) as follows:

𝐶𝐹𝑀 (𝑥) =

130

Σ𝑦 𝐼(𝑥) 𝑁𝑦

(1)

131

where I is the intensity obtained by converting original RGB to gray values, and Ny the number of

132

pixels in the vertical axis of the image (y). In other words, with the equation (1) we calculate the

133

average intensity along the pictures’ horizontal axis (x), which is in our scenario the most

134

affected by changes due to the light/shadowing cycles. Secondly, we modeled CFM with a

135

polynomial function and obtained MCFM. The latter is iteratively compared to the characteristic

136

functions of the other pictures of the dataset (i.e., characteristic functions for slave images, CFS).

137

The fitness between MCFM and CFS was evaluated by considering the norm-1 of their difference,

138

as follows:

139

‖𝑀𝐶𝐹𝑀 − 𝐶𝐹𝑠 ‖1 ≤ 𝑘 ∙ ‖𝑀𝐶𝐹𝑀 − 𝐶𝐹𝑀 ‖1

(2)

140 141

where k is the threshold defined for the selection of pictures similar to the master. The norm-1

142

was selected as estimator in equation (2) because of its robustness to outlier values (Ke and 6

143

Kanade, 2005). A collection of the different situations affecting the quality of the images acquired

144

in our area of study, and the comparison between the MCFM and CFS, is provided in the

145

Supplementary Material, S2. With the supervised selection strategy, only 36% of the available

146

TLC imagery was selected as suitable for the subsequent DIC analysis. The comparison

147

between the supervised selections relying on different norm-1 thresholds and manual selection

148

based on subjective evaluation of the pictures shows that, by assuming k values between 3 and

149

5, we obtain very similar performances, i.e. Simple Matching Coefficients are larger than 0.8

150

(Sokal and Sneath, 1963). Values of k, as well as the polynomial order to be considered for

151

MCFM (in our case a 4th polynomial order has been considered), are site specific and have to be

152

calibrated for the area under investigation.

153

3.2 Image pairing

154

After the selection of the dataset, a criterion to pair images to be processed and obtain

155

displacement time series has to be identified. If the temporal baseline is relatively short (in our

156

case the sampling rate is 1 picture/hour), the detection of potential displacements via DIC

157

approaches is limited by the image resolution (Leprince et al., 2007). On the other hand, in

158

environments characterized by large slope movements, image pairs with rather long temporal

159

baseline (e.g., several weeks or even months) can be affected by very large surface changes,

160

and thus unsuitable for reliable DIC results. The minimum and maximum temporal baseline for

161

pairs are thus also site-specific parameters. Due to preliminary knowledge of the study area and

162

initial DIC tests, we expected deformation in the order of 10-20 cm/day, and we defined one day

163

as minimum and seven days as maximum temporal baseline. Then, images are paired only if

164

acquired at the same hour of the day, in order to mitigate the effects of cast shadowing. Such

165

criterion resulted in a total of 1,123 pairs to be further processed with DIC.

7

166

3.3 DIC analysis

167

Before applying DIC and obtain surface deformation, images acquired at different times have to

168

be aligned by relying on control points and/or on areas assumed to be stable over the

169

investigation period (Giordan et al., 2016; Travelletti et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015). In our

170

pictures, part of the northern slope of the Aletsch valley within the observation time is imaged

171

(opposite to the area of investigation, location Driest, where the TLC was installed, see also

172

Figure 1 and Figure 2); therefore, we selected a sub-portion of this area as reference for pictures

173

alignment (also referred to as co-registration step). Subsequently, DIC was used to evaluate

174

internal misalignment of sub-portions (i.e., within Correlation Windows, CW) of the images to find

175

potential deformation of the investigated area along two directions (i.e., orthogonal to the camera

176

sight, the so-called camera view plane).

177

In recent years, several DIC algorithms have been proposed, each one with different benefits

178

and drawbacks (Heid and Kääb, 2012). Here we consider the approach presented in (Guizar-

179

Sicairos et al., 2008), which operates in the frequency domain and obtains an initial estimate of

180

the cross-correlation peak between master and slave images within search windows using a 2D

181

Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Moreover, the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) is

182

used as metric for cross-correlation accuracy (Fienup, 1997). The implementation of DIC

183

approaches based on FFT are known to perform faster than other algorithms, and this is

184

convenient in our scenario due to the large amount of pairs to process (Heid and Kääb, 2012).

185

After preliminary tests, we selected the dimensions of the Correlation Windows (CW) as 16x16

186

pixels. This is a compromise between computational time, accuracy, and expected spatial

187

resolution of the displacement field (Delacourt et al., 2007). Following Nyquist-Shannon theory,

188

spatial sampling was thus 8 pixels (in both directions orthogonal to the camera sight), and an

189

oversampling factor 4x was applied to further increase the DIC theoretical accuracy (Leprince et

190

al., 2007). We applied DIC on the 1,123 pairs and computed offset velocities (in pixels/day) for

191

both directions orthogonal to the camera sight, as well as the NRMSE. We remind that the offset 8

192

values retrieved with DIC are representative of the offset occurring within the correlation window,

193

and the results are for convenience assigned to the center of CW. Thus, the final DIC results are

194

represented as the displacements occurred within “cells”, with ground sampling distance in

195

agreement with the DIC sampling.

196

To compute time series, we defined a time step of 1 day, suitable for our investigation and

197

available dataset and in agreement with the minimum temporal baseline used for image pairing,

198

see also section 2.2), and stacked (averaged) “cell-wise” the obtained DIC velocities (see Figure

199

3). Similar stacking approaches are frequently used to increase the signal-to-noise ratio in large

200

remote sensing datasets (Gorelick et al., 2017; Stumpf et al., 2017). To further reduce noise

201

effects and outliers on the final displacement time series results, we consider for each time step

202

only cells presenting small NRMSE. Finally, the velocity results can be integrated over time to

203

compute displacement time series for each cell over the area of interest.

204

4. Results

205

Figure 4 shows a relevant subset of the results obtained applying the time series approach

206

described above (complete DIC time series results are presented in the Supplementary Material,

207

S3). Looking at the spatial and temporal evolution of the slope, we note that the initial phase is

208

characterized by minor displacements until August 19th. Before this date, signs of deformation

209

can be noticed only at the interface between the glacier and the slope. Instead, clustering of

210

cells with deformation becomes remarkable in the Silbersand area within a relatively short period

211

(between August 19th and August 26th). At this stage, the portion of the active slope located on

212

the western side (right side in the figure) entails the largest deformation values. There, the

213

surface deformation pattern is bounded on the western side by the progressive opening of a

214

tensile fissure, and its lateral evolution can be observed over time. A closer look to velocities and

215

displacement time series for a point at this location (see Figure 5b) reveals an exponential

216

evolution of the displacements between August 19th and August 22nd, followed by a sharp 9

217

decrease of the deformation trend and a progressive reduction of the deformation until the end

218

of our investigation period (September 23rd). The displacement time series measured at different

219

locations (see Figure 6 a-e) within the active slope area show also an increase in the same time

220

period, despite less pronounced. Considering the average ground pixel dimensions in the area

221

analyzed, we obtain total displacements in the period July 8 and September 23, 2015 ranged

222

between 0.5 and 5 meters. The temporal evolution of the DIC time series is very similar to the

223

measurement obtained from the RTS at the point p65 (see Figure 6f); however, the total

224

amplitude over the whole time period is sensibly smaller (see section 5 for details). The

225

displacement maps obtained with DIC allowed us defining the total area affected by the

226

deformation (~0.01 km2), as well as to identify subdomains within the active slope characterized

227

by different deformation velocities.

228

5. Discussion

229

Monitoring spatial and temporal evolution of displacements in alpine environments is important

230

to evaluate and understand the effects of climatic changes, as well as to deal with potential

231

hazards associated to catastrophic failures (Huggel et al., 2012). Slope areas can be very

232

difficult to access and/or affected by rapid surface changes, thus unsafe for in situ installations.

233

For this reason, remote sensing approaches are often a suitable alternative. Recently, several

234

studies have shown how active ground-based remote sensing techniques (e.g., Radar and

235

LiDAR) can be used to gain accurate information on slope processes (Abellán et al., 2014;

236

Kieffer et al., 2016; Rouyet et al., 2017). However, despite their versatility and achievable

237

accuracies, these approaches might be hindered because of unsuitable logistics, poor revisit

238

times, and/or high costs of installation and management for monitoring purposes. On the other

239

hand, passive remote sensing methods such as the acquisition of optical imagery with TLC

240

offers also the possibility to quantitatively monitor the evolution of surface deformation in

241

different scenarios. Indeed, DIC approaches applied to multitemporal acquisitions of pictures of

10

242

the same scene can be used to map and track deformation over space and time, provided that

243

the coherence between analyzed images is preserved in the target area (Travelletti et al., 2012).

244

In this study, we have shown how to leverage on large datasets of optical images acquired from

245

an off-the-shelf TLC installed in high alpine environment. Using the herein proposed approach,

246

we mapped and monitored slope deformation in a rock slide in the Silbersand area at the tongue

247

of the Great Aletsch Glacier. The results have provided details on the deformation occurred,

248

where early in summer 2015 signs of a potential failure were recognized from field inspections.

249

The supervised selection of TLC imagery allowed to work on a homogeneous dataset and to

250

decrease the amount of data to process with DIC, although retaining the information about the

251

deformation occurred over space and time. In addition, the stacking approach allowed to

252

increase the signal-to-noise ratio and, despite the relatively low resolution of the TLC data

253

available, to achieve accuracies in the order of fractions of pixels in agreement with previously

254

presented DIC time series approaches (Casu et al., 2011; Stumpf et al., 2017).

255

The time series show that in the period between July and September 2015 a portion of the

256

Silbersand slope has experienced rapid surface displacement, in particular during the period

257

August 19th-22nd. By taking a closer look to the TLC pictures available, it is possible to note that

258

on August 22nd a portion of the Silbersand slope has failed, and that the rock blocks and debris

259

have reached the Massa river levels; however, the failed material was not sufficient to interrupt

260

the river flow. Morphological details of this failure are evidenced on the high-resolution pictures

261

acquired from a high resolution TLC installed closer to the Silbersand active slope in the event’s

262

aftermath (see location of high resolution TLC in Figure 1 and details in Supplementary Material,

263

S4).

264

The final stages of this failure event have developed very rapidly (within 3-4 hours, see

265

Supplementary Material, S5). Such a fast evolution could not be fully tracked by our analysis,

266

because of the temporal step selected for the generation of the time series (1 day). In addition, 11

267

the constraints imposed to perform a full back analysis of the dataset over the area of interest

268

(i.e., coherence preservation for the time period analyzed), cause underestimations of

269

displacements in the specific portion affected by the failure. A careful analysis of the time series

270

evidences that most of the DIC cells at this location are below the NRMSE thresholds for most of

271

the time period, and only after August 22nd start to show some reliable deformation probably

272

associated to the post failure phases (see .gif animation Supplementary Material). The

273

exponential evolution towards failure in the vicinity of the failing zone, as well as a noticeable

274

drop of displacements after the event, is well in agreement with the independent results obtained

275

from the RTS (see also Figure 6). Several additional slope failures have occurred since that

276

time, mainly in the upstream direction and correlate with the progressive retreat of the Great

277

Aletsch glacier tongue position.

278

A number of limitations have to be taken into account when using the DIC results for a correct

279

interpretation of the surface deformation retrieved. Indeed, depending on the acquisition

280

geometry only portions of the actual displacement vectors can be retrieved with DIC. In our

281

specific case, the camera-viewing angle is approximately orthogonal to the slope area analyzed

282

(see also Figure 1); thus, the along- and across-slope displacements occur in the camera plane

283

and can be fully tracked. However, in cases where the viewing geometry is not orthogonal to the

284

slope, specific corrections have to be applied considering the topographic relief of the area of

285

study (Travelletti et al., 2012; Giordan et al., 2016). Furthermore, we remind again that out-of-

286

camera view plane deformation cannot be measured with DIC. This is an intrinsic limitation of

287

the approach, which could be mitigated only by combining measurements from multiple

288

acquisitions of the same area at the same time from different view angles, as already presented

289

for satellite based imagery (Casu and Manconi, 2016). In our results, this problem is evidenced

290

by the comparison between DIC and the point p65 measured with RTS. With DIC, we measure

291

only average deformation occurring in the camera plane, while with RTS we retrieve the 3D

292

deformation at a single point. Values are compatible in amplitude until August 22nd, i.e. the day 12

293

of the failure occurring on the western portion; however, after this date the p65 shows a further

294

increase of the displacements (despite with reduced trend), while the DIC time series fade

295

progressively. We interpret these differences as an expression of localized large displacement

296

occurring only in the vicinity of the installation of p65, which ended with the final failure of the

297

target (not measurable with RTS after September 23rd). Thus, displacements measured at p65

298

are not fully representative of the behavior of the entire slope. Similar local problems at targets

299

measured with RTS have been experienced in other unstable slopes (Manconi and Giordan,

300

2015). Despite local inaccuracies, our results suggest that the DIC methodology proposed is

301

suitable to identify spatial and temporal changes in the deformation pattern from TLC, and to

302

provide appropriate and additional information helping in the evaluation of the status of activity of

303

an active slope area.

304

6. Conclusions

305

We have developed a method to derive displacement time series from of active slope processes

306

from large datasets of time-lapse cameras acquisitions. The application to a case study in the

307

Swiss Alps provided important hints on the spatial and temporal evolution of a rock slope failure

308

occurring in the vicinity of the Great Aletsch glacier tongue. The surface acceleration toward

309

failure has been retrieved and the behavior of the slope deformation is in agreement with the

310

results obtained from ground based monitoring. Moreover, the lateral evolution of the

311

displacements from the west to the east end of the slope evidenced a potential relationship

312

between the slope activity and the glacier retreat. This will be further investigated and modeled

313

to derive a better understanding of the physical processes underlying the interaction between

314

the glacier and the Silbersand slope. At this stage, we tested the performance of the method on

315

a back-analysis of TLC acquisitions; however, our approach can be straightforwardly

316

implemented to perform near-real-time monitoring of surface deformation. Our results confirm

317

that the use of low-cost TLC may provide quantitative and fairly accurate alternatives to measure

13

318

the evolution of surface deformation in areas characterized by active slope processes and

319

elsewhere.

320

7. Acknowledgements

321

We thank P. Schwitter Gmbh and Ruppen Michael from Odilo Schmid und Partner AG for

322

support in the field operations.

323

8. References

324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360

Abellán, A., Oppikofer, T., Jaboyedoff, M., Rosser, N.J., Lim, M., Lato, M.J., 2014. Terrestrial laser scanning of rock slope instabilities. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 39, 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3493 Angeli, M.-G., Pasuto, A., Silvano, S., 2000. A critical review of landslide monitoring experiences. Eng. Geol. 55, 133–147. Bridges, N.T., Ayoub, F., Avouac, J.-P., Leprince, S., Lucas, A., Mattson, S., 2012. Earth-like sand fluxes on Mars. Nature 485, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11022 Casu, F., Manconi, A., Pepe, A., Lanari, R., 2011. Deformation Time-Series Generation in Areas Characterized by Large Displacement Dynamics: The SAR Amplitude Pixel-Offset SBAS Technique. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49, 2752–2763. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2104325 Danielson, B., Sharp, M., 2013. Development and application of a time-lapse photograph analysis method to investigate the link between tidewater glacier flow variations and supraglacial lake drainage events. J. Glaciol. 59, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013JoG12J108 Delacourt, C., Allemand, P., Berthier, E., Raucoules, D., Casson, B., Grandjean, P., Pambrun, C., Varel, E., 2007. Remote-sensing techniques for analysing landslide kinematics: a review. Bull. Société Géologique Fr. 178, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.178.2.89 Delbridge, B.G., Bürgmann, R., Fielding, E., Hensley, S., Schulz, W.H., 2016. Three-dimensional surface deformation derived from airborne interferometric UAVSAR: Application to the Slumgullion Landslide. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 2015JB012559. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012559 Dermanis, A., Kotsakis, C., 2006. Estimating Crustal Deformation Parameters from Geodetic Data: Review of Existing Methodologies, Open Problems and New Challenges, in: Geodetic Deformation Monitoring: From Geophysical to Engineering Roles, International Association of Geodesy Symposia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-38596-7_2 Dravida, S., Woods, J., Shen, W., 1984. A comparison of image filtering algorithms, in: ICASSP ’84. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Presented at the ICASSP ’84. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 259–262. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1984.1172540 Dzurisin, D., 2006. Volcano Deformation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49302-0 Farinotti, D., Magnusson, J., Huss, M., Bauder, A., 2010. Snow accumulation distribution inferred from time-lapse photography and simple modelling. Hydrol. Process. 24, 2087– 2097. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7629 14

361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412

Fienup, J.R., 1997. Invariant error metrics for image reconstruction. Appl. Opt. 36, 8352–8357. Fredembach, C., Finlayson, G., 2006. Simple shadow removal, in: Pattern Recognition, 2006. ICPR 2006. 18th International Conference On. IEEE, pp. 832–835. Gariano, S.L., Guzzetti, F., 2016. Landslides in a changing climate. Earth-Sci. Rev. 162, 227– 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011 Giordan, D., Allasia, P., Dematteis, N., Dell’Anese, F., Vagliasindi, M., Motta, E., 2016. A LowCost Optical Remote Sensing Application for Glacier Deformation Monitoring in an Alpine Environment. Sensors 16, 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101750 Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R., 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 Grämiger, L.M., Moore, J.R., Gischig, V.S., Ivy-Ochs, S., Loew, S., 2017. Beyond debuttressing: Mechanics of paraglacial rock slope damage during repeat glacial cycles. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2016JF003967. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003967 Guizar-Sicairos, M., Thurman, S.T., Fienup, J.R., 2008. Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms. Opt. Lett. 33, 156–158. Heid, T., Kääb, A., 2012. Evaluation of existing image matching methods for deriving glacier surface displacements globally from optical satellite imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 118, 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.024 Huggel, C., Clague, J.J., Korup, O., 2012. Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains? Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 37, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2223 Ke, Q., Kanade, T., 2005. Robust L/sub 1/norm factorization in the presence of outliers and missing data by alternative convex programming, in: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference On. IEEE, pp. 739– 746. Kieffer, D.S., Valentin, G., Unterberger, K., 2016. Continuous real-time slope monitoring of the Ingelsberg in Bad Hofgastein, Austria. Geomech. Tunn. 9, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201500047 Kos, A., Amann, F., Strozzi, T., Delaloye, R., von Ruette, J., Springman, S., 2016. Contemporary glacier retreat triggers a rapid landslide response, Great Aletsch Glacier, Switzerland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016GL071708. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071708 Leprince, S., Barbot, S., Ayoub, F., Avouac, J.-P., 2007. Automatic and Precise Orthorectification, Coregistration, and Subpixel Correlation of Satellite Images, Application to Ground Deformation Measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45, 1529–1558. Leprince, S., Berthier, E., Ayoub, F., Delacourt, C., Avouac, J.-P., 2008. Monitoring Earth Surface Dynamics With Optical Imagery. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 89, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO010001 Loew, S., Gischig, V., Glueer, F., Seifert, R., Moore, J.R., 2017. Multidisciplinary monitoring of progressive failure processes in brittle rock slopes, in: Rock Mechanics and Engineering Volume 4: Excavation, Support and Monitoring. CRC Press, London, pp. 629–662. Manconi, A., 2016. Monitoring, in: Bobrowsky, P.T., Marker, B. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–8. Manconi, A., Casu, F., 2012. Joint analysis of displacement time series retrieved from SAR phase and amplitude: Impact on the estimation of volcanic source parameters: sbas and po-sbas joint analysis. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052202 Manconi, A., Casu, F., Ardizzone, F., Bonano, M., Cardinali, M., De Luca, C., Gueguen, E., Marchesini, I., Parise, M., Vennari, C., others, 2014. Brief communication: Rapid mapping of event landslides: the 3 December 2013 Montescaglioso landslide (Italy). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2, 1465–1479. 15

413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453

Manconi, A., Giordan, D., 2015. Landslide early warning based on failure forecast models: the example of the Mt. de La Saxe rockslide, northern Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15, 1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1639-2015 Rouyet, L., Kristensen, L., Derron, M.-H., Michoud, C., Blikra, L.H., Jaboyedoff, M., Lauknes, T.R., 2017. Evidence of rock slope breathing using ground-based InSAR. Geomorphology, Slope tectonics: inherited structures, morphology of deformation and catastrophic failure 289, 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.005 Scambos, T.A., Dutkiewicz, M.J., Wilson, J.C., Bindschadler, R.A., 1992. Application of image cross-correlation to the measurement of glacier velocity using satellite image data. Remote Sens. Environ. 42, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(92)90101-O Singleton, A., Li, Z., Hoey, T., Muller, J.-P., 2014. Evaluating sub-pixel offset techniques as an alternative to D-InSAR for monitoring episodic landslide movements in vegetated terrain. Remote Sens. Environ. 147, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.003 Strozzi, T., Delaloye, R., Kääb, A., Ambrosi, C., Perruchoud, E., Wegmüller, U., 2010. Combined observations of rock mass movements using satellite SAR interferometry, differential GPS, airborne digital photogrammetry, and airborne photography interpretation. J. Geophys. Res. 115. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001311 Stumpf, A., Malet, J.-P., Delacourt, C., 2017. Correlation of satellite image time-series for the detection and monitoring of slow-moving landslides. Remote Sens. Environ. 189, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.007 Travelletti, J., Delacourt, C., Allemand, P., Malet, J.-P., Schmittbuhl, J., Toussaint, R., Bastard, M., 2012. Correlation of multi-temporal ground-based optical images for landslide monitoring: Application, potential and limitations. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 70, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.03.007 Van Puymbroeck, N., Michel, R., Binet, R., Avouac, J.P., Taboury, J., 2000. Measuring earthquakes from optical satellite images. Appl. Opt. 39, 3486–3494. Vernier, F., Fallourd, R., Friedt, J.M., Yan, Y., Trouvé, E., Nicolas, J.M., Moreau, L., 2012. Glacier flow monitoring by digital camera and space-borne SAR images, in: 2012 3rd International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA). Presented at the 2012 3rd International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA), pp. 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTA.2012.6469541 Walter, T.R., 2011. Low cost volcano deformation monitoring: optical strain measurement and application to Mount St. Helens data. Geophys. J. Int. 186, 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05051.x Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Feng, J., 2005. On the Euclidean distance of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1334–1339. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.165 Wang, Z., Kieu, H., Nguyen, H., Le, M., 2015. Digital image correlation in experimental mechanics and image registration in computer vision: Similarities, differences and complements. Opt. Lasers Eng., Special Issue on Digital Image Correlation 65, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.04.002

16

454

9. Figures

455

456 457 458 459 460

Figure 1. The Great Aletsch area, Swiss Alps. (a) Overview of the study region with indications of the Silbersand landslide area and locations of monitoring sensors (vertical scale exaggerated for visualization). (b) Mobotix M25 webcam and (c) Robotized Total Station Leica TM50, respectively, both installed at the Driest location.

461

17

462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472

Figure 2. Example of the pictures acquired from the Mobotix M25. X and Y are the directions in the camera view plane, i.e. orthogonal to the camera sight, respectively. The target area of Silbersand is bounded by the red rectangle, and the unstable slope (yellow polygon) is in the center of the scene. The contact between the southern slope and the southern boundary of the Aletsch glacier is also visible in the pictures. The bottom of the picture (white shading) images a portion of the northern slope, i.e. Driest, where the TLC is installed. This area is considered as stable reference for DIC analyses (orange rectangle). Location of the RTS point targets (p61, p63 and p65) has been selected to monitor the potential evolution of the tensile fractures (black lines) identified early in July 2015.

473

18

474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484

Figure 3. Schematic representation of the stacking approach used to generate time series from multitemporal TLC acquisitions. For each pair (Pi) the surface deformation velocity (vi) is computed with DIC. Velocity (𝑉𝑛 ) for each time step (tn) is then calculated as the average of DIC velocities falling within the defined temporal window. For example, average velocity for the time t2 is the average of v2, v3 and v4, as well as any additional DIC result covering the considered time step (see gray shading). This approach allows increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, as the average of random noise will tend to zero while real offsets of DIC results will be highlighted. Displacement time series for each DIC cell can be calculated by integrating average the resulting 𝑉𝑛 velocities over time.

485

19

486 487 488 489

Figure 4. Cumulative surface displacement in the y camera direction (downslope) as measured from the DIC time series analysis. Dates of the relevant time steps shown is reported on top of each snapshot.

490 491

20

492 493 494 495 496

Figure 5. (left) Total displacement between July 8 and September 23, 2015 (y camera axis) in the Silbersand area. (right) Surface velocity (gray bars) and displacement time series (orange solid line) for the point (a) over the period of investigation.

21

497 498 499 500 501 502

Figure 6. (a-e) Displacement time series as measured from DIC for different points located in the Silbersand active slope (see location in Figure 5). (f-g) Three-dimensional displacement time series measured from the Robotized Total Station at different point targets (see location of the station and of the target points in Figure 1 and Figure 2)

22

Suggest Documents