Further Work:

3 downloads 0 Views 11MB Size Report
Jul-15. Stream flow (m. ³/s). Simulated vs. observed streamflow in calibration and validation period - Cajueiro gauging station. Observed Streamflow (m³/s).
LAND USE CHANGE EFFECTS ON HYDROLOGICAL REGIME IN THE XINGU WATERSHED - BRAZIL Vanessa C. Dos 1Laboratoire

1 Santos ,

François

1 Laurent ,

1 Messner ,

François

2 Camila A. Abe , Ana

C.

3 Meireles

Espaces et Sociétés - Université du Maine, 2Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais -INPE, 3Universidade Federal do Cariri

OVERVIEW The Xingu Watershed (509.000km²), located at the agricultural frontier area of Eastern Amazon is divided into areas of extensive native forests, and areas with differing levels and types of agricultural activities. This watershed has suffered intense deforestation over the last four decades, with expansion of grain cropland and cattle ranching at the southern region of the basin. As of 2004, government policies increased the discipline of environmental legislation which has since partially reduced the advance of deforestation.

AIM Model the relation between land use and water discharge of the Xingu watershed using the SWAT model, analysing the impacts of future land use scenarios.

Datasets Type

Source (date)

Description

SRTM

SRTM 3 arc-seconds for global coverage (90 meters)

Weather

INMET (1970 - 2015)

Daily temperature (min., max.), solar radiation, humidity, wind speed

Rainfall

TRMM product 3B42(19982016)

Daily TRMM radar estimates for a 0,25 grid

Land Use

TerraClass project - INPE

Land use map 1:250,000

Soil

EMPRAPA, RADAMBRASIL and pedotransfer functions

Soil map 1:250,000 and horizon specific soil properties for each soil type

ANA (1998 – 2015)

Daily and monthly streamflow

DEM

Streamflow

SIMULATIONS: Simulations are currently being performed on Iriri River sub-basin. Iriri River sub-basin

3 (Pedra do O, Cajueiro and Laranjeiras) ParaSol

0 -5000

Streamflow (m³/s) Dec-15

R2 = 0,79 NS = 0,7 PBIAS = -15,26 RSR = 0,51

Validation

4000

Streamflow (m³/s)

Calibration

Mar-12

Oct-11

May-11

Dec-10

Jul-10

Feb-10

Sep-09

Apr-09

Nov-08

Jun-08

Jan-08

Aug-07

Mar-07

Oct-06

May-06

Dec-05

Jul-05

Feb-05

Sep-04

Apr-04

Nov-03

Jun-03

Jan-03

Aug-02

Oct-15

May-15

Dec-14

Jul-14

Feb-14

Sep-13

Apr-13

Nov-12

Jun-12

Jan-12

Aug-11

Mar-11

Oct-10

May-10

Dec-09

Jul-09

Feb-09

Differences (observed and simulated streamflow) and LOESS - Cajueiro gauging station

R2 = 0,83 NS = 0,44 PBIAS = -31,86 RSR = 0,27

4000

Sep-08

Simulated Streamflow: 1998-2015

Simulated vs. observed streamflow in calibration and validation period - Cajueiro gauging station 5000

Mar-02

-6000 Apr-08

Jun-15

Dec-14

Jun-14

Dec-13

Jun-13

Dec-12

Jun-12

Dec-11

Jun-11

-4000

Dec-04

Observed Streamflow (m³/s)

Dec-10

Jun-10

Dec-09

Jun-09

Dec-08

Jun-08

Dec-07

Jun-07

Dec-06

3000 2000 1000

Obs - Sim

LOESS

2000 0 -2000

Observed Streamflow (m³/s)

Simulated Streamflow: 1998-2015

Jul-15

Jan-15

Jul-14

Jan-14

Jul-13

Jan-13

Jul-12

Jan-12

Jul-11

Jan-11

Jul-10

Jan-10

Jul-09

Jan-09

Jul-08

Jan-08

Jul-07

Jan-07

Jul-06

Jan-06

Jul-05

Jan-05

Jul-04

Jan-04

Jul-03

Jan-03

Jul-02

Jan-02

Jul-01

Jan-01

Jul-00

-4000 -6000 Jan-98 Jul-98 Jan-99 Jul-99 Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Jul-01 Jan-02 Jul-02 Jan-03 Jul-03 Jan-04 Jul-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12 Jan-13 Jul-13 Jan-14 Jul-14 Jan-15 Jul-15

0

Jun-06

1000

-2000

Nov-07

2000

0

Jun-07

3000

LOESS

2000

Jan-07

4000

Obs - Sim

Aug-06

5000

4000

Mar-06

Calibration

Oct-05

6000

R2 = 0,36 NS = 0,81 PBIAS = -20,12 RSR = 0,18 Validation

May-05

R2 = 0,48 NS = 0,85 PBIAS = -59,29 RSR = 0,70

Oct-01

Differences (observed and simulated streamflow) and LOESS –Laranjeiras gauging station

Simulated vs. observed streamflow in calibration and validation period - Laranjeiras gauging station 7000

May-01

Simulated Streamflow: 1998-2015

Dec-00

-15000

Jul-00

-10000

Feb-00

Mar-12

Sep-11

Mar-11

Sep-10

Mar-10

Sep-09

Mar-09

Sep-08

Mar-08

Sep-07

Mar-07

Sep-06

Mar-06

Sep-05

Mar-05

Sep-04

Mar-04

Sep-03

Mar-03

Sep-02

Mar-02

Sep-01

Mar-01

Sep-00

Observed Streamflow (m³/s)

0

Research sponsored by the Université du Maine - Avenue Olivier Messiaen, 72085 - LE MANS - FRANCE

Mar-00

2000

LOESS

5000

Sep-99

4000 0

Obs - Sim

Streamflow (m³/s)

6000

Jan-00

• More investigation into the water balance components. • Model to the entire Xingu watershed. • Improves model performance (calibration and validation using others gauging stations). • Calibration and validation the sediment load. • Scenarios (Storylines and Management).

Validation

8000

Dec-05

Further Work:

10000

Jul-99

*.plant.dat

Calibration

Jun-05

ESCO, EPCO, CANMX.hru, OV_N.hru CH_N2, CH_K, ALPHA_BNK CN2, PHU_PLT, BIOMIX, SURLAG SOL_AWC, SOL_K, SOL_BD BIO_E, BLAI, DLAI, T_OPT, T_BASE, ALAI_MIN, GSI, FRGRW1, LAIMX1, FRGRW2, LAIMX2

12000

R2 = 0,89 NS = 0,89 PBIAS = -4,62 RSR = 0,14

R2 = 0,87 NS = 0,85 PBIAS = -10,81 RSR = 0,35

Jan-99

*.hru *.rte *.mgt *.bsn *.sol

Differences (observed and simulated streamflow) and LOESS - Pedra do Ó gauging station 10000

Jul-98

*.gw

Simulated vs. observed streamflow in calibration and validation period - Pedra do Ó gauging station

Sep-99

Parameter ALPHA_BF, GW_DELAY,GWQMN, GW_REVAP, REVAPMN

Dec-04

Model File

Illustration of model results for three gauging Station in Iriri Sub-basin

Jan-98

SWAT parameters used for sensitivity analysis

Streamflow (m³/s)

Annual rainfall [mm] Mean temperature [°C] Mean slope [%] Evapotranspiration method Channel routing Gauging stations used for streamflow (Q) calibration Calibration method

Streamflow (m³/s)

Climate

142.000 km2 93.88 % Forest 87.88% Acrisols/Lixisols 17 314 2% L and use, 2% Soil, 1% Slope Am after Köppen Tropical monsoon climate with 3 months dry season 2000 24 2.6 Hargreaves Muskingum

Streamflow (m³/s)

Area [km2] Dominant natural vegetation Dominant soils type No of sub-basins in the model No of HRUs Thresholds