Ohio University - Avionics Engineering â DASC October 2012. eDME Architecture Development and. Flight-Test Evaluation. 1 ...
eDME Architecture Development and Flight-Test Evaluation
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
1
DME CONOPS within NextGen 4 Pillars of APNT CONOPS: Concept Of Operations for NextGen Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing, FAA, March 1, 2012
Backup
Evolutionary improvements
Legacy DME
Modified procedures
Revolutionary improvements
Enhanced DME
Land safely
1. Safe recovery (landing) of aircraft flying in Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) under Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations, 2. Strategic modification of flight trajectories to avoid areas of interference and manage demand within the interference area, 3. Continued dispatch of air carrier operations to deny an economic target for an intentional jammer,
Alternate
4. Flight operations continue without a significant increase in workload for Continue either the pilot or the Air Navigation procedures as usual Service Provider (ANSP) during an interference event.
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
2
PBN and ADS-B Surveillance Performance in Support of TBO From: “Concept Of Operations for NextGen Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing,” Appendix G, FAA, March 1 2012
Flight Operation Taxi-out Takeoff Climb to Cleanup Departure / Climb
Cruise HD airspace Top of Descent Arrival Approach Taxi –in
HD airspace HD airspace LNAV RNP (AR)
Navigation Surveillance (
(
Accuracy* Containment NACp NIC Separation - - Visual Visual Visual 92.6 m (8) 1111 m (6) Visual Visual Visual 92.6 m (8) 1111 m (6) 3 nm 1 nm 2 nm 3 nm 92.6 m (8) 1111 m (6) 3 nm 10 nm 20 nm 20 nm 4 nm 8 nm 10 nm 5 nm < 308 m (7) < 1852 m (5) 2 nm 4 nm 3 nm 2 nm 1 nm 2 nm 4 nm 5 nm < 308 m (7) < 1852 m (5) 1 nm 2 nm 3 nm < 1 nm 2 nm 3 nm < 308 m (7) < 1852 m (5) 3 nm < 3 nm > 1 MHz, e.g. 10 MHz) - TDMA to mitigate near-far • Superior multipath mitigation and ranging accuracy
Precise 3&5 #""" &.,""#6& 8. 5 $'%&"&%%$ Multipath bounding Æ assured ranging
Data broadcast
Remain legacy compliant Broadcast of alternative modulation signal
DME-Next
•
Synchronized beat signal broadcast – – – –
•
Transponders time & frequency sync passive ranging -> unlimited capacity Precise time '+,"0."# distribution Improved multipath performance
Carrier phase tracking –
Ultra precise displacement measurement (mm/s)
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
DME-Sync
; %'=., " #"9",+%, #"
DME Architecture Development Cost-Benefit DME-AltMod Alternate modulation
DME-Sync D ME S DME-Next
Synchronized transponders Precise time
Transponder beat signal, carrier phase, data broadcast No transponder synchronization
DME/N-Recap Upgraded transponder & interrogator performance, improved coverage
legacy DME/N
>"0.,"3) "&" Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
12
Unique Architecture Elements
amplitude
DME Carrier Phase
Combination of 1-way and 2-way ranging
time
Increased Capacity
Improved Accuracy
Significant reduction of interrogation rate
Range smoothing Precise Velocity
Enhanced Integrity Multipath bound
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
13
Flight Test Setup GROUND
AIR DME transponder GPS/IMU/Rb
10 MHz
PPS
RF data recorder GPS
PPS
10 MHz
CW @ 1107 MHz
RF data recorder
RF signal gen. 1 ms CW cal. burst
CW @ 1107 MHz
Freq spectrum
RF signal gen. DME pulses
Rb oscillator
Real-time quality monitoring
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
14
DME carrier phase Pulses are NOT phase coherent amplitude
(There is no fixed relationship between pulse phase and pulse envelope) But the carrier phase is continuous between pulses time
DME carrier phase provides ultra-precise (mm-level) displacement
measurements. This enables: Averaging of the pulse-measurement noise and multipath Æ Accuracy ++ Bounding of multipath Æ assured ranging Æ Integrity ++ precise velocity Æ accurate intent for ADS-B (tight) integration with inertials of a wide variety of performance classes
(Navigation grade, Tactical grade, Sub-Tactical) Successfully flight-"&"3 @$%J ",&2K . , 35, Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
15
Measured DME carrier phase performance DME carrier phase - GPS/IMU/Rb truth 0.15
0.03
#
0.026
± #Q
0.05 DME carrier phase - GPS/IMU/Rb truth
0.024 100 0.022 80 0.02
0.1
DME slant displacement error [m]
0.028
60 40
± 92.6m &"#
0.018
20 56.5
57
0
57.5
58
58.5
0
-0.05
59 -0.1
-20 -40
0
10
-60
-100
20 30 40 50 Horizontal distance towards transponder [km]
60
10
-80
Antennna Gain [dB]
DME slant displacement error [m]
DME slant displacement error [m]
0.032
5 V&"#W6&
0
10
20 30 40 50 0 Horizontal distance towards transponder [km] -5
60
-10
April 5, 2012: Ohio University Baron-58, Thales 415SE low-power DME transponder, custom -15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 RF data collection setup and custom GPS/IMU/Rb truth Horizontal distance towardssystem transponder [km] Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
16
Transponder Antenna Pattern 3000 50 30 20 15 12 10
8 7
6
5
4
3
2.4o
2500
Only high-performance DME measurements in main beam of transponder antenna
altitude [m]
2000
dB Systems 510A antenna gain
1500 10 dB
10
0 dB 1000
-10 dB
5
-20 dB -30 dB 500
-5 0
-10 -15 -20 -25 -30
0
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10
Antennna Gain [dB]
Antenna Gain [dB]
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
elevation angle [ o]
60
70
80
90
0 -10 -20 -30
20 30 40 50 Horizontal distance towards transponder [km]
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
60
17
Measured DME pulse range performance 4
2.2
PDF of DME pulse range error
x 10
2 1.8 1.6
# occurances
1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -150
-100
-50 0 50 DME pulse range error [m]
100
150
• Transponder is “squittering” at 2700 ppps • Post-processing of RF recording of each transmitted (ground) and received (air) pulse , use classic half-amplitude method to determine TOT and TOA • 2700 ppps Æ .#%,," "3%"-way pulse pair range measurements per second • Total " &.,"" &X (mean of all range measurements) • (Note: approximately 9 dB additional insertion loss in setup due to bad contact) Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
18
“Simulating” legacy DME/N performance • Assume noise and multipath statistics of 2-way ranging are identical to 1-way ranging • Interrogation rate of legacy DME/N ranges from 5 to 30 ppps, here ppps is used • Assume 1 sec smoothing 50 40
500
Apply a 1-sec moving average 0
DME/N ranging error [m]
Randomly select 15 ppps from 2700 ppps measurements
30
±
20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40
-500 10
20 30 40 50 60 Slant range towards transponder [km]
-50 10
40 50 20 30 Slant range towards transponder [km]
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
60
19
“Simulating” eDME beat signal • Assume 500 ppps beat signal with pseudo-random pulse timing • Assume 100 sec smoothing using carrier (Carrier-Smoothed Pseudorange) 50
Randomly select 500 ppps from 2700 ppps measurements Apply a -sec moving average
eDME pseudoranging error [m]
40 30
±
20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 10
40 50 20 30 Slant range towards transponder [km]
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
60
20
DME-Next: Combine 1-way & 2-way ranging • Two-way range (using legacy interrogation – reply): – Absolute range, but – Limited capacity
• One-way range (using “beat” signal broadcasted by transponders): – Synchronize with occasional 2-way ranging to solve for unknown Tx clock offset – Low interrogation rate (e.g. 1 Hz) Æ high capacity – Transponders only require stable frequency ( -1, 10-11 s/s) Carrier phase displacement x xx x x x xx x x x x x 2-way range xx x x* x x x x x x x x*x x x x xx xx x x x x 1-way range x x x* x x xx x * xx Multipath bound Carrier-smoothed 2-way range 1-way range Tx clock offset 1-way range Rx clock offset Solve Tx and Rx clock offset by occasional 2-way ranging
Solve for change in Rx clock offset by carrier phase precise velocity
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
21
DME 2-Way Ranging Measurement Error True range
Troposphere delay
A = Air = Interrogator G = Ground = Transponder
Interrogator clock drift during Time of Flight
Error in reply delay Multipath measured by transponder
Noise transponder
Multipath measured by interrogator
Noise interrogator
Uncompensated interrogator delays (cable, filter, etc) Remaining error terms (Example: Bias introduced by squaring for half-amplitude TOA)
Ohio University - Avionics Engineering – DASC October 2012
22
DME Carrier Phase Measurement Error True range
Troposphere delay
A = Air = Interrogator G = Ground = Transponder
Remaining errors, such as antenna phase patterns Multipath
Interrogator clock Error
Interrogator clock drift. Solve for by DME carrier phase precise velocity
Transponder clock Error
Transponder clock drift. Assumed small (