Effect of a Dopexamine-induced Increase in Cardiac ... - ATS Journals

4 downloads 0 Views 79KB Size Report
MICHAEL GEORGIEFF, and PETER RADERMACHER. Department of Anesthesiology ..... Wiedeck, M. Georgieff, and J. Vogt. 1997. Effects of a dobutamine- ... Temmesfeld-Wollbrück, B., A. Szalay, K. Mayer, H. Olschewski, W. Seeger, and F.
Effect of a Dopexamine-induced Increase in Cardiac Index on Splanchnic Hemodynamics in Septic Shock PETER KIEFER, ILYAS TUGTEKIN, HEIDE WIEDECK, HENDRIK BRACHT, GÖTZ GELDNER, MICHAEL GEORGIEFF, and PETER RADERMACHER Department of Anesthesiology, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany

In 12 patients with hyperdynamic septic shock we studied the effect of dopexamine, a combined dopamine and ␤-adrenergic agonist, on hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics and O2 exchange. All patients required noradrenaline to maintain mean arterial pressure ⬎ 60 mm Hg (noradrenaline ⭓ 0.04 · ␮g ⭈ kg⫺1 ⭈ min⫺1) with a cardiac index ⭓ 3.0 L/min/m2. Splanchnic blood flow (Q spl) was measured using primed continuous infusion of indocyanine green dye with hepatic venous sampling. In addition tonometric gastric mucosal–arterial and gastric mucosal–hepatic venous PCO2 gradients were assessed as indicators of regional energy balance. After 90 min of stable hemodynamics a first measurement was obtained. Then dopexamine infusion was titrated (1–4 ␮g ⭈ kg⫺1 ⭈ min⫺1) to increase cardiac output by approximately 25% (20–30%). After 90 min all measurements were repeated, and · dopexamine was withdrawn followed by a third measurement. Median Q spl (0.86/1.23–0.66 versus 0.96/1.42–0.85 L/min/m2 [median value/25th–75th percentiles], p ⬍ 0.05) increased whereas the · fractional contribution of Q spl to total blood flow decreased (21/28-13 versus 19/28–12%, p ⬍ 0.05). Although both global and regional oxygen delivery (DO2) consistently increased, neither global or re. gional V O2 nor PCO2 gradients were significantly affected. In patients with septic shock and ongoing noradrenaline treatment dopexamine seems to have no preferential effects on hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics, O2 exchange, or energy balance. Kiefer P, Tugtekin I, Wiedeck H, Bracht H, Geldner G, Georgieff M, Radermacher P. Effect of a dopexamine-induced increase in cardiac inAM J RESPIR CRIT CARE MED 2000;161:775–779. dex on splanchnic hemodynamics in septic shock.

· Inadequate splanchnic blood flow (Qspl) is regarded to play a pivotal role in the development of multiple organ failure (MOF) associated with septic shock (1–5). Recently, we showed that exogenous ␤-stimulation is crucial for the maintenance of · Qspl and oxygen exchange (6). Furthermore, the synthetic · ␤-mimetic dobutamine induced an increase in Qspl (7, 8), thereby disclosing pathologic regional O2 uptake/supply de· pendency (8). Dobutamine, however, mainly increases Qspl in close correlation to cardiac index (8, 9). Moreover, it did not prevent alterations of hepatic ultrastructure in hyperdynamic porcine septic shock induced by fecal peritonitis (10). By contrast, the combined dopamine and ␤-adrenergic agonist dopexamine not only increased blood flow to the splanchnic area in patients with congestive heart failure (11) but also improved parameters of intestinal and hepatic oxygenation and function in the critically ill (12, 13). Moreover, it improved gastric mucosal capillary oxygenation in human septic shock (14). Finally, in the above-mentioned porcine shock model dopexamine only maintained hepatic ultrastructure (10), and in rats improving oxygen delivery with dopexamine attenuated the endotoxin-induced alterations of the microcirculation (15).

(Received in original form January 27, 1999 and in revised form August 12, 1999) Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Universität Ulm, Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie, Steinhövelstraße 9, 89075 Ulm (Donau), Germany. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 161. pp 775–779, 2000 Internet address: www.atsjournals.org

Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the hypothesis whether dopexamine improves hepatosplanchnic blood flow and thereby parameters of regional energy balance in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock.

METHODS The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Ulm University Medical School. Twelve patients with septic shock were studied, all requiring noradrenaline to maintain mean arterial pressure ⬎ 60 mm Hg (noradrenaline infusion rate ⭓ 0.04 ␮g ⭈ kg⫺1 ⭈ min⫺1). The patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) age between 18 to 70 yr; (2) cardiac index ⭓ 3.0 L/min/m2; (3) temperature ⭓ 38⬚ C or ⭐ 36⬚ C; (4) leukocytes ⭐ 4,000 or ⭓ 12,000 109/L. All studies were accomplished during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation (Servo 900 C; Siemens AG, Solna, Sweden), and the patients were deeply sedated and given analgesic intravenously with continuous midazolam (Dormicum; Hoffmann LaRoche AG, Basel, Switzerland) and fentanyl (Janssen, Neuss, Germany) and relaxed with cisatracurium (Nimbex; Glaxo Wellcome, Bad Oldesloe, Germany). During the protocol the patients were not fed enterally, all intravenous fluids were kept at maintenance infusion rates, and no red blood cells were given. Turning or other nursing procedures were prohibited in order to avoid manipulation-induced variations of global or splanchnic oxygen exchange. In addition to routine monitoring (radial and pulmonary artery catheters), a balloon-tipped catheter was inserted into one hepatic vein. For this purpose the hepatic vein was cannulated via the right internal jugular vein, and the correct position of the catheter verified before and after the study by fluoroscopy using a small amount of contrast dye. A nasogastric tube (TRIP NGS Catheter; Tonometrics,

776

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

Inc., Worcester, MA) was inserted in the stomach (16). Correct position was confirmed by X-ray.

Regional Hemodynamic Measurements The total hepatosplanchnic blood flow was estimated using a primed, continuous infusion of indocyanine green (ICG), based on the Fick principle and hepatic venous sampling (17). The method was previously evaluated in intensive care patients and described in detail (17, 18). Briefly, after a prime injection of ICG (12 mg; Cardiogreen, Becton-Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, MD), the dye was infused at a constant rate (0.5 mg/min) into a peripheral vein. At 20, 25, and 30 min of infusion, blood samples were taken from the hepatic venous an the arterial catheter for the analysis of ICG levels and subsequent estimation of hepatosplanchnic blood flow. The mean of the three blood flow values was taken for calculations. The arterial and hepatic venous ICG concentrations were in a steady-state plateau at each measurement as indicated by the coefficient of variation of 1 ⫾ 3% (mean ⫾ SD) for the arterial and the hepatic vein dye concentrations for the consecutive samples taken at 20, 25, and 30 min of each measurement. The mean ICG extraction of our patients was 35 ⫾ 18% (mean ⫾ SD), exceeding the limit of 10% in 35 of 36 measurements, which is required for valid application of this method (19). During the second baseline only in Patient 11 the extraction was 8%. The balloon-tipped catheter positioned in a hepatic vein enabled us to continuously determine the hepatic venous pressure (Phv) and intermittently, by inflating the balloon, the hepatic venous occlusion pressure (Phvo). Phvo is regarded to yield a close estimate of the portal venous pressure (20, 21). According to the following formulas we then calculated the resistances across the. splanchnic vascular bed. Total splanchnic resistance ⫽. ( Psa ⫺ Phv)/Qspl; prehepatic splanchnic. resistance ⫽ ( Psa ⫺ Phvo)/Qspl; hepatic resistance ⫽ ( Phvo ⫺ Phv)/Qspl where Psa ⫽ mean systemic arterial pressure. . Regional oxygen delivery (DO2) was calculated as a product of Qspl and arterial oxygen content (CaO2). Regional oxygen extraction was calculated as arterial–hepatic venous oxygen content difference/CaO2, . · and the regional V O2 as the product of Qspl times the arterial–hepatic venous oxygen content difference. The gastric mucosal PCO2 was measured semicontinuously (10-min intervals) via the nasogastric tube with a Tonocap (Tonocap TC 200; Baxter, München, Germany) using air to inflate the balloon.

VOL 161

2000

30-min period, and a second set of data was collected. Then the dopexamine infusion was withdrawn. After another 90 min of stabilization, the third set of regional blood flow measurement and collection of data was performed. The total duration of the study, hence, was 280 to 300 min depending on the time to titrate the infusion rate of dopexamine.

Statistical Methods Data are presented as median and 25th–75th percentiles. After exclusion of normal distribution the differences between the measurements were analyzed by the Friedman rank sign analysis of variance and a subsequent Wilcoxon-Wilcox rank sign test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was considered at p ⬍ 0.05.

RESULTS Global Hemodynamics

The increased cardiac index was due to both a rise in heart rate (90/100–87 versus 116/128–110 min, p ⬍ 0.01) and, to a smaller extent, to an increased stroke volume index (45/49–40 versus 51/69–48 ml/m2, p ⬍ 0.01) Neither central venous pressure (Pcv) nor pulmonary vascular pressures were affected by dopexamine (Table 1). The increased cardiac index resulted in increased systemic DO2 (537/592–465 versus 636/795–540 ml/ min/m2, p ⬍ 0.01) despite a decrease in PaO2 (12.8/14.4–10.7 versus 11.4/12.3–10.1 kPa, p ⬍ 0.01) whereas mean systemic · V O2 remained unaffected (Table 2). In five patients we could find an increase in body temperature by 0.5 to 0.8⬚ C during dopexamine infusion. The changes in temperature were not · correlated to changes in V O2. Regional Hemodynamics

The increased cardiac index resulted in a significant increase · in Qspl (0.86/1.23–0.66 versus 0.96/1.42–0.85 L/min/m2, p ⬍ · 0.01) (Table 1). The fractional contribution of Qspl to cardiac index (21/28–13 versus 19/28–12%, p ⬍ 0.05) decreased in all but one patient (Figure 1). Neither mean Phv nor Phvo was influenced by dopexamine (Table 1). Although the driving pres-

Other Measurements Systemic and pulmonary vascular pressures were continuously measured via an arterial catheter and a Swan-Ganz catheter inserted in the pulmonary artery via the vena subclavia or vena jugularis interna. · Systemic oxygen consumption (V O2) was measured continuously from the inspired and expired respiratory gases by open-circuit indirect calorimetry (Deltatrac; Datex-Engstroem, Helsinki, Finland) (22). The oxygen extraction was calculated as the arterial–mixed . venous oxygen content difference divided by CaO2. Cardiac output (Q) was measured continuously (Vigilance. Baxter, München, Germany) or by thermodilution in triplicate using 10 ml of room temperature saline after 60 and 90 min of each phase of the study. Blood gases were sampled at the 30 min timepoint of ICG sampling and blood gases and hemoglobin O2 saturations were measured using a clinical blood gas analyzer (Nova Stat Profile M; Nova Biomedical, Rödermark, Germany). Oxygen contents were calculated as: Hb ⭈ SO2 ⭈ 1.36 ⫾ PO2 ⭈ 0.03.

Protocol Before the baseline measurement of gas exchange, systemic and regional blood flow, global hemodynamics, and gas exchange were monitored for a 60-min period to assure a stable condition. During this period, no changes were made in the ventilator settings or any other treatment. During the following 30 min, the hepatosplanchnic blood flow was measured using the ICG infusion method (17). After the baseline measurement a dopexamine infusion was started, and the infusion rate was incrementally adjusted until a 25% (20 to 30%) increase in cardiac index had been obtained. To obtain this goal, 1–4 ␮g ⭈ kg⫺1 ⭈ min⫺1 were required. After 60 min of stabilization, the regional blood flow measurement was repeated during a

TABLE 1 GLOBAL AND REGIONAL HEMODYNAMICS* Baseline 2

CI, L/min/m Psa , mm Hg Pcv, mm Hg Ppa, mm Hg Ppao, mm Hg HR, beats/min SVI, ml/beats/m2 · Qspl, L/min/m2 · Qspl/CI, % Phv, mm Hg Phvo, mm Hg Phvo ⫺ Phv, mm Hg Phv ⫺ Pcv, mm Hg Splanchnic resistance Prehepatic resistance Hepatic resistance Systemic resistance

3.7/5–3.5 75/81–68 11/13–9 30/34–26 16/17–12 90/100–87 45/49–40 0.86/1.23–0.66 21/28–13 12/14–11 15/18–14 2/5–1 2/2–1 76/84–50 72/80–48 3/6–1 16/13–19

Dopexamine †

4.9/6.3–3.9 76/83–71 10/12–9 31/33–26 13/14–10 116/128–110† 51/69–48† 0.96/1.42–0.85† 19/28–12† 12/14–10 16/25–8 4/5–2† 2/3–1 65/76–43† 62/72–41† 3/7–2 13/10–15†

Baseline 4.2/5.1–3.4‡ 70/78–69 11/13–9 30/33–27 15/16–14 95/106–88‡ 35/39–30‡ 0.94/1.45–0.68‡ 20/30–14 12/14–11 16/17–13 3/4–2 1/2–1 70/89–43 66/85–40 3/9–1 15/13–18‡

Definition of abbreviations: CI ⫽ cardiac index; HR ⫽ heart rate; Pcv ⫽ central venous pressure; Phv ⫽ hepatic venous pressure; Phvo ⫽ hepatic venous occlusion pressure; Phv ⫺ Pcv ⫽ difference between hepatic venous pressure and central venous pressure; Phvo ⫺ Phv ⫽ difference between hepatic venous occlusion pressure and hepatic venous pressure; Ppa ⫽ mean pulmonary arterial pressure; Ppao ⫽ pulmonary arterial · occlusion pressure; Psa ⫽ mean systemic arterial pressure; Q spl ⫽ splanchnic blood flow; · Q spl/CI ⫽ fractional splanchnic blood flow of cardiac index; SVI ⫽ stroke volume index. * All data are presented as median and 25th–75th percentiles. † p ⬍ 0.05 versus baseline. ‡ p ⬍ 0.05 versus dopexamine infusion.

Kiefer, Tugtekin, Wiedeck, et al.: Dopexamine and Splanchnic Hemodynamics

777

TABLE 2 SYSTEMIC AND REGIONAL OXYGEN EXCHANGE

DO2, ml/min/m2 · VO2, ml/min/m2 PaO2, kPa splDO2, ml/min/m2 · splVO2, ml/min/m2 splO2, extraction % PhvO2, kPa

Baseline

Dopexamine

Baseline

537/592–465 157/173–139 12.8/14.4–10.7 116/160–87 66/73–42 71/77–58 3.9/4.2–3.6

636/795–540† 174/186–146 11.4/12.3–10.1† 130/187–100† 62/91–42 65/71–50† 4.1/4.4–3.5

547/632–447‡ 164/193–132 12.3/13.5–11.4‡ 120/183–82 61/86–43 69/74–58 3.8/4.1–3.5

Definition of abbreviations: DO2 ⫽ oxygen delivery; PaO2 ⫽ arterial oxygen partial pressure; PhvO2 ⫽ hepatic venous oxygen partial pressure; splDO2 ⫽ splanchnic oxygen de· · livery; splV O2 ⫽ splanchnic oxygen consumption; V O2 ⫽ oxygen consumption. * All data are presented as median and 25th–75th percentiles. † p ⬍ 0.05 versus baseline. ‡ p ⬍ 0.05 versus dopexamine infusion.

sures of venous return were not significantly affected, both the total and prehepatic resistances significantly decreased without significant effect on hepatic resistance (Table 1). Splanchnic DO2 increased in· all patients (Figure 2,· upper panel) but, similar to systemic V O2, mean splanchnic V O2 was not significantly affected (Table 2) although there was profound interindividual variation (Figure 2, lower panel). Neither the mean gastric mucosal–arterial PCO2 gradient nor the gastric mucosal–hepatic venous PCO2 gradient was significantly altered (Table 3) although again there was substantial interindividual variability (Figure 3). One patient had to be excluded from the analysis of PCO2 gradients for technical reasons.

DISCUSSION This study investigated the hypothesis whether dopexamine may improve hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and parameters of regional energy balance in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock requiring noradrenaline to maintain mean arterial blood pressure. The key findings are as · follows: the dopexamine-induced increase in Q resulted in a · concomitant increase in Qspl; the fractional contribution of · · Qspl to Q decreased; and dopexamine did not consistently influence regional oxygen exchange nor the tonometric PCO2 gradient. In good agreement to previous studies (11, 23, 24) dopex· · amine consistently increased both Q and Qspl. In most studies · such an increase in Qspl mostly paralleled the increase in sys-

· Figure 1. Fractional contribution of Qspl to cardiac index.

Figure 2. (Upper panel ) Individual changes in splanchnic oxygen delivery (splDO2) after a dopexamine-induced increase in cardiac index. (Lower panel ) Individual changes in splanchnic oxygen con· sumption (spl V O2) after a dopexamine-induced increase in cardiac index.

temic blood flow (12, 13). It is noteworthy that the fractional · contribution of the regional blood flow to total Q was even reduced during dopexamine infusion in our patients (Figure 1). Although this redistribution of blood flow was statistically significant, this finding probably lacks clinical significance: the · · decrease in percent contribution of Qspl to Q was only modest (from 21/28–13 to 19/28–12) and the absolute regional blood flow nevertheless increased as a result of the pronounced rise · in Q. It should be noted, however, that Cain and Curtis (24) had also found a decreased fractional blood flow to the gut 3 h after the start of a combined dextran and dopexamine infusion in endotoxic dogs. We can only speculate about the discrepancy between our findings and the previous human studies, but both the underlying disease and the treatment may have assumed importance in this context: In contrast to the investigations mentioned previously, our patients received ongoing noradrenaline intravenously to maintain Psa for 24 to 48 h prior to the study. Modulation of the ␤-adrenergic receptor density and affinity resulting from both the noradrenaline treatment and the underlying sepsis per se (25–27) may have altered hemodynamic response to the dopexamine infusion. Although we could not demonstrate any preferential redis· tribution of Q to the splanchnic region, we found clear effects

778

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE TABLE 3 PCO2 GRADIENTS Baseline

PCO2 mixed venous ⫺ PCO2 arterial, kPa PCO2 gastric mucosal ⫺ PCO2 arterial, kPa PCO2 hepatic venous ⫺ PCO2 arterial, kPa PCO2 gastric mucosal ⫺ PCO2 hepatic venous, kPa

Dopexamine

Baseline

0.9/1.1–0.6

0.6/0.9–0.3

0.8/1–0.6

2.8/3.4–1.5

2.2/3.3–1.8

2.8/3.7–1.3

1.2/1.3–0.8

0.8/1.5–0.32

1.1/1.4–0.8

1.8/2.1–0.8

1.6/2.2–⫺0.57

1.7/1.1–0.5

Definition of abbreviations: PCO2 gastric mucosal ⫺ PCO2 arterial ⫽ difference between gastric mucosal and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; PCO2 gastric mucosal ⫺ PCO2 hepatic venous ⫽ difference between gastric mucosal and hepatic venous carbon dioxide partial pressure; PCO2 hepatic venous ⫺ PCO2 arterial ⫽ difference between hepatic venous and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; PCO2 mixed venous ⫺ PCO2 arterial ⫽ difference between mixed venous and arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure. * All data are presented as median and 25th–75th percentiles.

of dopexamine within the splanchnic region. Measuring Phvo and Phv enabled us to calculate the prehepatic and hepatic resistance. Despite inconsistent changes in the driving pressures of venous return, the splanchnic vascular resistance sig-

Figure 3. (Upper panel ) Individual changes in gastric mucosal–arterial PCO2 gradients after a dopexamine-induced increase in cardiac index. (Lower panel ) Individual changes in gastric mucosal–hepatic venous PCO2 gradients after a dopexamine-induced increase in cardiac index.

VOL 161

2000

nificantly decreased obviously partly as a result of a significant decrease in prehepatic resistance (Table 1). Mean hepatic resistance, by contrast, was not affected (Table 1). The main effect of dopexamine within the splanchnic region, hence, seems to be the prehepatic area, a finding which is consistent with the pharmacologic profile of dopexamine (28) as a combined ␤2- and dopamine receptor agonist as well as the particular distribution of ␤2-receptors within the splanchnic region (29). In all patients, dopexamine increased both systemic and splanchnic DO2, while neither mean systemic nor splanchnic · V O2 significantly changed. The findings of our study, therefore, do not allow disclosure of a pathologic splanchnic oxygen uptake/supply relationship. Nevertheless, it should be noted that three patients exhibited a steep increase in splanchnic · V O2 concomitant with the rise in splanchnic DO2 (Figure 2). In contrast to previous data (8) the small number of patients in our study together with a potential mathematical coupling of · shared variables, namely splanchnic DO2 and V O2 (30), however, precludes any general conclusion with respect to re· gional DO2/ V O2 relationships. Dopexamine infusion did not significantly change the mean gastric mucosal–arterial PCO2 gradient (Figure 3). Even in those patients in whom the PCO2 gradient exceeded the threshold that Schlichtig and Bowles (31) had determined as being compatible with aerobic metabolism, e.g., a gradient of 25 mm Hg, the effect of dopexamine did not produce a consistent response. The gastric mucosal–hepatic venous PCO2 gradient did not show a homogenous response either (Figure 3), and variations were mostly caused by changes in the gastric mucosal PCO2. Finally, the changes in the ·PCO2 gradients were not related to variations in splanchnic V O2 (Figure 4). Such a dissociation between changes in PCO2 gradients on the one hand and regional blood flow, oxygen exchange, and/or intracapillary oxygenation on the other hand has been previously reported during dopexamine infusion by other investigators (14, 32): Temmesfeld-Wollbrück and coworkers (14) could not find a clear change in CO2 gradients despite a significant increase in gastric mucosal intracapillary O2 saturation and relative hemoglobin concentration as assessed by remission spectrophotometry. Uusaro and coworkers (32) did not find improved · PCO2 gradients either when Qspl was increased by dopexamine in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In conclusion, in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock who had stabilized with volume infusion and noradrenaline, · infusing dopexamine to further increase Q resulted in increased

Figure 4. Correlation between splanchnic oxygen consumption · (spl V O2) and gastric mucosal–arterial PCO2 gradients after dopexamine infusion.

Kiefer, Tugtekin, Wiedeck, et al.: Dopexamine and Splanchnic Hemodynamics

· Qspl. A preferential effect, however, on the splanchnic circulation with increased fractional contribution of the regional · blood flow to Q could not be detected.

16.

Acknowledgment : The study was supported by a grant of Ipsen Pharma represented by Dr. B. Schwabe.

17.

References

18.

1. Baue, A. E. 1975. Multiple, progressive, or sequential systems failure: a syndrome of the 1970s. Arch. Surg. 110:779–781. 2. Quartin, A. A., R. M. Schein, D. H. Kett, and P. N. Peduzzi. 1997. Magnitude and duration of the effect of sepsis on survival. J.A.M.A. 277: 1058–1063. 3. Meakins, J. L., and J. C. Marshall. 1989. The gut as the motor of multiple system organ failure. In A. Marston, G. B. Bulkey, R. G. FiddianGreen, and U. H. Haglund, editors. Splanchnic Ischaemia and Multiple Organ Failure. Edward Arnold, London. 339–348. 4. Fiddian-Green, R. G. 1989. Studies in splanchnic ischaemia and multiple organ failure. In A. Marston, G. B. Bulkley, R. G. Fiddian-Green, and U. H. Haglund, editors. Splanchnic Ischaemia and Multiple Organ Failure. Edward Arnold, London. 349–363. 5. Dantzker, D. R. 1993. The gastrointestinal tract: the canary of the body? J.A.M.A. 270:1247–1248. 6. Reinelt, H., P. Radermacher, P. Kiefer, G. Fischer, U. Wachter, J. Vogt, and M. Georgieff. 1999. Impact of exogenous ␤-adrenoreceptor stimulation on hepato splanchnic oxygen kinetics and metabolic activity in septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 27:325–331. 7. Reinelt, H., P. Radermacher, G. Fischer, W. Geisser, U. Wachter, H. Wiedeck, M. Georgieff, and J. Vogt. 1997. Effects of a dobutamineinduced increase in splanchnic blood flow on hepatic metabolic activity in patients with septic shock. Anesthesiology 86:818–824. 8. DeBacker, D., J. Creteur, O. Noordally, N.. Smail, B. Gulbis, and J. L. Vincent. 1998. Does hepato-splanchnic V O2/DO2 dependency exist in critically ill septic patients? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 157:1219– 1225. 9. Ruokonen, E., A. Uusaro, E. Alhava, and J. Takala. 1997. The effect of dobutamine infusion on splanchnic blood flow and oxygen transport in patients with acute pancreatitis. Intensive Care Med. 23:732–737. 10. Tighe, D., R. Moss, G. Haywood, A. Webb, N. al Saady, F. Heath, and D. Bennet. 1993. Dopexamine hydrochloride maintains portal blood flow and attenuates hepatic ultrstructural changes in a porcine peritonitis model of multiple system organ failure. Circ. Shock 39:199–206. 11. Leier, C. V. 1988. Regional blood flow responses to vasodilators and inotropes in congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 62:86E–93E. 12. Smithies, M., T. H. Yee, L. Jackson, R. Beale, and D. Bihari. 1994. Protecting the gut and the liver in the critically ill: effects of dopexamine. Crit. Care Med. 22:789–795. 13. Maynard, N. D., D. J. Bihari, R. N. Dalton, M. N. Smithies, and R. C. Mason. 1995. Increasing splanchnic blood flow in the critically ill. Chest 108:1648–1654. 14. Temmesfeld-Wollbrück, B., A. Szalay, K. Mayer, H. Olschewski, W. Seeger, and F. Grimminger. 1998. Abnormalities of gastric mucosal oxygenation in septic shock. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 15:1586– 1592. 15. Schmidt, W., A. Häcker, M. Gebhard, E. Martin, and H. Schmidt. 1998.

19. 20. 21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29. 30.

31.

32.

779

Dopexamine attenuates endotoxin-induced microcirculatory changes in rat mesentery: role of ␤2-adrenoceptors. Crit. Care Med. 26:1639– 1645. Fiddian-Green, R. G. 1995. Gastric intramucosal pH, tissue oxygenation and acid base balance. Br. J. Anaesth. 74:591–606. Uusaro, A., E. Ruokonen, and J. Takala. 1995. Estimation of splanchnic blood flow by the Fick-principle in man and problems in the use of indocyanine green. Cardiovasc. Res. 30:106–112. Brinkmann, A., E. Calzia, K. Träger, and P. Radermacher. 1998. Monitoring the hepato-splanchnic region in the critically ill patient. Intensive Care Med. 24:542–556. Leevy, C. M., C. L. Mendehall, and W. Lesko. 1962. Estimation of hepatic bloodflow with indocyanine green. J. Clin. Invest. 41:1169–1179. Price, J. B., B. A. McFate, and R. F. Shaw. 1964. Dynamics of bloodflow through the normal canine liver. Surgery 56:1109–1120. Friedman, E. W., and R. S. Weiner. 1951. Estimation of hepatic sinusoid pressure by means of venous catheters and estimation of portal pressure by hepatic vein catheterization. Am. J. Physiol. 165:527–531. Takala, J., O. Keinänen, and P. Väisänen. 1989. Measurement of gas exchange in intensive care: laboratory and clinical validation of new device. Crit. Care Med. 17:1041–1047. van Lambalgen, A. A., A. A. van Kraats, M. F. Mulder, G. C. van den Bos, T. Teerlink, and L. G. Thijs. 1993. Organ blood flow and distribution of cardiac output in dopexamine- or dobutamine-treated dogs. J. Crit. Care 8:117–127. Cain, S. M., and S. E. Curtis. 1992. Systemic and regional oxygen uptake and lactate flux in endotoxic dogs resuscitated with dextran and dopexamine or dextran alone. Circ. Shock 38:173–181. Silverman, H. J., R. Penaranda, J. B. Orens, and N. H. Lee. 1993. Impaired beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate in human septic shock: association with myocardial hyporesponsiveness to catecholamines. Crit. Care Med. 21:31–39. Bernardin, G., A. D. Strosberg, A. Bernard, M. Mattei, and S. Marullo. 1998. ␤-adrenergic receptor-dependent and -independent stimulation of adenylate cyclase in impaired during severe sepsis in humans. Intensive Care med. 24:1315–1322. Reinelt, H., G. Fischer, J. Vogt, W. Geisser, E. Trunk, H. Wiedeck, M. Mezödy, M. Georgieff, and P. Radermacher. 1997. Dobutamine and dopexamine and splanchnic metabolic response in septic shock. Clin. Intensive Care 8:38–41. Brown, R. A., J. Dixon, J. B. Farmer, J. C. Hall, R. G. Humphries, F. Ince, S. E. O’Connor, W. T. Simpson, and G. W. Smith. 1985. Dopexamine: a novel agonist at peripheral receptors and beta 2-adrenoceptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 85:599–608. Granger, D. N., P. D. Richardson, I. Kvietys, and N. A. Mortillaro. 1980. Intestinal blood flow. Gastroenterology 78:837–863.π Phang, P. T., K. F. Cunningham, J. J. Ronco, B. R. Wiggs, and J. A. Russell. 1994. Mathematical coupling explains dependence of oxygen consumption on oxygen delivery in ARDS. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 150:318–323. Schlichtig, R., and S. A. Bowles. 1994. Distinguishing between aerobic and anaerobic appearance of dissolved CO2 in intestine during low flow. J. Appl. Physiol. 76:572–577. Uusaro, A., E. Ruokonen, and J. Takala. 1995. Gastric mucosal pH does not reflect change in splanchnic blood flow after cardiac surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 74:149–154.