Effect of mental stress on dynamic

1 2 3Q3 4 5 6 7 Q18Q4 9 10Q5 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Q6 26 27 28 29 30Q7 31 32Q8 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

Effect of mental stress on dynamic electrophysiological properties of the endocardium and epicardium in humans Malcolm C. Finlay, MRCP, PhD,* Pier D. Lambiase, PhD, FHRS, FRCP,* Ron Ben-Simon, MD, FRCP,† Peter Taggart, DSc, FRCP‡ From the *University College London, Queen Mary University of London & St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom, †Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom, and ‡ University College London, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. BACKGROUND Striking temporal associations exist between ventricular arrhythmia and acute mental stress, for example, during natural disasters, or defibrillator shocks associated with stressful events. We hypothesized that electrophysiological changes in response to mental stress may be exaggerated at short coupling intervals and hence relevant to arrhythmia initiation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the dynamic response in human electrophysiology during mental stress. METHODS Patients with normal hearts and supraventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiological studies avoiding sedation. Conditions of relaxation and stress were induced with standardized psychometric protocols (mental arithmetic and anger recall) during decremental S1S2 right ventricular (RV) pacing. Unipolar electrograms were acquired simultaneously from the RV endocardium, left ventricular (LV) endocardium (LV endo), and epicardium (LV epi), and activation-repolarization intervals (ARIs) computed. RESULTS Twelve patients ( 9 women; median age 34 years) were studied. During stress, effective refractory period (ERP) reduced from 228 ⫾ 23 to 221 ⫾ 21 ms (P o .001). ARIs reduced during mental stress (P o .001), with greater reductions in LV endocardium

Introduction The ability of conscious mental activity to influence the risk of cardiac arrhythmia has been well recognized. Controlled data have showed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks to be temporally associated with periods of mental stress.1,2 In a series of elegant studies, mental stress increased T-wave alternans and decreased arrhythmia threshold in a series of ischemic heart disease patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.1,3 Furthermore, previous investigators have documented increased arrhythmogenicity in animal models during mental stress.4 These studies have This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. Dr Taggart and Dr Lambiase were supported by a grant from the MRC (grant no. G0901819). Address reprint requests and correspondence: Dr Malcolm Finlay, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom. E-mail address: malcolm.fi[email protected].

1547-5271/$-see front matter B 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

than in the epicardium or RV endocardium (LV endo 8 ms; LV epi 5 ms; RV 4 ms; P o .001). Mental stress depressed the entire Q9 electrical restitution curve, with minimal effect on slope. A substantial reduction in minimal ARIs on the restitution curve in LV endo occurred, commensurate with the reduction in ERP (LV endo ARI 195 ⫾ 31 ms at rest to 182 ⫾ 32 ms during mental stress; P o .001). Dispersion of repolarization increased sharply at coupling intervals approaching ERP during stress but not at rest. CONCLUSION Mental stress induces significant electrophysiological changes. The increase in dispersion of repolarization at short coupling intervals may be relevant to observed phenomena of arousal-associated arrhythmia. KEYWORDS Arrhythmia; Mental stress; Restitution; Dispersion of repolarization; Human electrophysiology ABBREVIATIONS APD ¼ action potential duration; ARI ¼ activation recovery interval; ERP ¼ effective refractory period; LV ¼ left ventricular; RV ¼ right ventricle/ventricular (Heart Rhythm 2015;0:-1–8) rights reserved.

I

2015 Heart Rhythm Society. All

confirmed a clear link between conscious activity and the risk of arrhythmia, but there are few data documenting the direct effects of such activity on cardiac ventricular electrophysiology. Taggart et al5 demonstrated the shortening of the monophasic action potential duration (APD) in human ventricles in response to isoprenaline. A steepening of APD electrical restitution was also observed, which may imply an increased susceptibility to arrhythmia. Recently, our group demonstrated a decrease in the activation recovery interval (ARI; a well-validated surrogate of APD derived from unipolar electrograms) in response to fear independent of heart rate changes.6 However, dynamic changes in electrophysiology due to mental stress may be even more relevant to the initiation of arrhythmia-clinical arrhythmia often commences with a premature extrasystole. It has been hypothesized that mental stress can contribute to arrhythmia by increasing http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.011

55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72

2 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129

heterogeneity of repolarization and activation (or conduction velocity) throughout the heart. These effects may amplify preexisting heterogeneity especially in the context of ischemic and structural heart disease and thus lead to conduction wavebreak and arrhythmogenesis. We hypothesized that electrophysiological changes in response to mental stress may become markedly exaggerated at short coupling intervals and hence relevant to arrhythmia initiation by premature beats. This was tested by performing electrophysiological studies on patients with normal ventricles at rest and during a controlled mental stress protocol.

P R I N T & W E B 4 C / F P O

Heart Rhythm, Vol 0, No 0, Month 2015

epicardial catheter (2-mm electrode spacing, Pathfinder, St 130 Jude Medical Inc, XXXX, MN) and at the right ventricular Q10 131 (RV) apex (2-5-2 mm electrode spacing, Pathfinder; 132 Figure 1). X-ray fluoroscopy was used to guide catheter F1133 electrode placement. A reference anodal electrode was 134 placed in the inferior vena cava. Further catheters were 135 placed according to clinical requirements following the 136 research protocol. Electrograms were digitized and recorded 137 at 1000 Hz (Bard Clearsign, XXXX, MN). Surface 12-lead 138 electrocardiograms were recorded throughout the study. 139 Oxygen saturations were measured continuously using pulse 140 oximetry, and blood pressure was measured noninvasively at 141 5-minute intervals. The research study was performed before 142 patients undergoing a clinical electrophysiological study. 143 Methods Following the clinical procedure, venous and arterial 144 Catheter placement and clinical studies sheaths were removed and hemostasis achieved with manual 145 The protocol was performed in patients with structurally pressure. 146 normal hearts undergoing cardiac electrophysiological stud147 ies for the diagnosis and ablation of supraventricular 148 Restitution pacing protocol tachycardia. All patients had normal resting electrocardioA S1S2 restitution study was conducted using programmed 149 grams, echocardiograms, and cardiac examinations. The electrical stimulation. Following 3 minutes of steady-state 150 study was approved by the ethics committee of University pacing at the RV apex at a cycle length of 600 ms, a 151 College London Hospitals (UCL REC no. 10/H7015/19) and drivetrain of 10 beats was followed by an extrastimulus (S2). 152 conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of The S1S2 interval was decremented by 20–300 ms and 153 Helsinki. All subjects gave prior written informed consent; thereafter in 5-ms intervals until effective refractory period 154 specifically they were informed that they would be asked to 155 (ERP) was reached. The ERP was found by increasing CIs Q11 undergo mental arithmetic with firm encouragement and to 156 by 8 ms and then decrementing further by 2-ms intervals. recall stressful past events as part of the study. Studies were 157 performed with a local anesthetic only in the postabsorptive 158 Mental stress studies state. Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued for 5 days Programmed electrical stimulation was performed during an 159 preprocedure. active relaxation protocol and again during mental stress in 160 Catheters were placed via venous sheaths (6F to 8F), with the manner described by Burg et al.7 During active relaxa- 161 4F arterial access (left ventricular [LV] retrograde catheter). tion, subjects were asked to think of a situation that they 162 All patients received 5000 units of unfractionated heparin. found subjectively relaxing and were asked to imagine 163 Decapolar catheters were placed in an epicardial coronary themselves being in that situation. Laboratory lighting was 164 vein (great cardiac/middle or lateral vein) via the coronary 165 turned down to a minimum and quiet kept among staff. Q12 sinus, retrogradely within the LV cavity adjacent to the 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 Figure 1 Catheter positions for in vivo studies. Schematic (A) and x-ray fluoroscopy (B) catheter positions are shown. endo ¼ endocardial; epi ¼ epicardial; 186 LA ¼ left atrium; LV ¼ left ventricle; RA ¼ right atrium; RV ¼ right ventricle.

Finlay et al 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243

Effect of Mental Stress on Dynamic Electrophysiology

Gentle prompts in a clam and reassuring manner were used to encourage the subject’s active memory of the situation. Mental stress was induced by 2 methods: mental arithmetic (with harsh encouragement) and anger recall. Data are presented from the activity that provoked the greatest stress response. Laboratory lighting was returned to full during the stress protocol. Mental arithmetic involved subtraction of serial 7 seconds from a 4-digit number. Strong encouragement was given to maintain subjects’ interest and concentration. If the subject was willing, anger recall was subsequently performed. Subjects were asked to remember a recent situation that made them angry. They were asked to relive that situation and tell the investigator as if describing that situation later that same day to a close friend. The investigator then attempted to mildly provoke further reaction with awkward questioning. Subjective stress was recorded on a Likert scale for each protocol, which has been shown to accurately correlate with physiological measures of stress.8 Intrinsic heart rate and blood pressure were taken as objective measures of stress response. Periods of sinus rhythm were recorded between drivetrains, enabling comparison of sinus rhythm activation.

Data analysis and statistics ARIs, as an estimate of APD,9–11 were calculated semiautomatically by means of the Wyatt method12 using automated custom algorithms implemented off-line13 (MATLAB, MathWorks, XXXX, XX). In brief, the steepest downstroke of the unipolar electrogram was taken as an indicative of local activation time and the steepest upstroke of the unipolar T wave was taken as the repolarization time. All electrogram data were checked manually. The absolute dispersion of repolarization for a single paced beat was measured as the time difference between the earliest measured repolarization and the latest measured repolarization time. All repolarization data were examined during RV pacing; thus, RV electrode sites tended to be the earliest to repolarize and LV epicardial sites the last. Measurements in absolute dispersion of repolarization taken from just 2 electrode sites per patient may be susceptible to measurement error. In order to take advantage of multiple electrode sites for each patient, we confirmed trends in repolarization by measuring the standard deviation of repolarization times across all electrodes and the interquartile ranges.14,15 Repolarization dispersion data were normalized to the mean dispersion measured during steady-state pacing during the active relaxation protocol for each patient. This allowed comparison between patients. We have previously detailed some of the challenges in analyzing electrogram restitution data.5 All statistical analysis was performed with R software (version 14.0.7, The R Foundation, XXXX, XX). Multiple measurements were acquired from each electrode, each catheter itself had 8–10 electrodes, and several catheters were used in each individual patient. Multilevel regression was used to preserve the

3

multilevel nature of data. This technique allows statistical models to be created accounting for data levels, and the probability of data groups coming from the same population of data were inferred by comparing models using analysis of variance comparisons. Dynamic comparisons of the dispersion of repolarization were performed graphically using LOESS (LOcal regrESSion) modeling to combine data sets. This nonparametric method allows trends and confidence intervals in scatterplot data acquired to be visualized. Paired single-level data were compared using the Student t test. Data are presented as mean ⫾ SD unless otherwise stated in the text.

Results Patient population Sixteen patients were enrolled (12 women and 4 men; median age 34 years; range 22–64 years). Four patients did not undergo full restitution stimulation protocols, and results are presented from 12 patients (9 women and 3 men) who completed at least 1 mental stress protocol satisfactorily. Reasons for noncompletion of full protocols were lack of time (2 patients) and patient refusal to continue with nonclinical study (2 patients). The final clinical diagnoses were atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (7 patients) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (3 patients). No inducible arrhythmia occurred in 2 patients, that is, normal electrophysiological study.

Efficacy of induction of mental stress All 12 patients reported low stress during the relaxation protocol (2.4 ⫾ 0.7; 1 ¼ no stress at all and 10 ¼ most stressed possible). All 12 patients completed the mental arithmetic protocol, and 7 patients were also able to complete the anger recall protocol. Five of these 7 patients reported greater stress during anger recall. All patients reported raised stress during mental stress protocols (mean of maximal stress 7.1 ⫾ 0.7; P o .01). An increase in the sinoatrial rate from a mean of 76 ⫾ 16 beats/min during active relaxation to 96 ⫾ 20 beats/min during maximal stress was observed (P o .001). Similarly, blood pressure increased from means of 122 ⫾ 15 mm Hg (systolic) and 71 ⫾ 8 mm Hg (diastolic) to 135 ⫾ 18 and 86 ⫾ 9 mm Hg, respectively (P o .001, both measures).

Steady-state ARIs are reduced during mental stress During drivetrain pacing (S1) in the active relaxation state, ARIs were longer in the LV endocardium than in the epicardium (LVEndo 237 ⫾ 32 ms; LVEpi 204 ⫾ 30 ms; P o .001) or RV endocardium (206 ⫾ 28 ms; P o .001). ARIs were reduced during mental stress across all sites (P o .001), with a greater reduction in the LV endocardium than in the epicardium or RV (mean change in ARI during mental stress compared to baseline values: LVEndo 8 ms; LVEpi 5.0 ms; RVEndo 4 ms; Figure 2).

244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 Q13 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 Q14 294 295 296 297 298 299 F2300

4 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 F3 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 T1 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357

Figure 2 Activation-repolarization interval (ARI) reductions during mental stress. A box plot of the change in ARI as compared to the mean ARI during steady-state pacing in the active relaxation protocol is shown. Light boxes indicate data acquired during relaxation, and dark boxes indicate ARI during mental stress. Asterisk represents P o .001 (analysis of variance multilevel regression). A significant reduction in ARI during mental stress was observed in all 3 measurement locations. Epi ¼ epicardial; LV ¼ left ventricular endocardium; RV ¼ right ventricular endocardium.

Restitution of ARI Marked interchamber variability in restitution slopes occurred during active relaxation, with the epicardium exhibiting the shallowest restitution slope (slope 0.55; 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.64) and steeper restitution in the LV endocardium (slope 1.0; 95% confidence interval 0.81– 1.3; P o .001) and RV (slope 0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.56–1.00; P o .001, all comparisons). Mental stress resulted in an overall depression of the entire electrical restitution curve. The reduction in ARI during mental stress during S1 pacing was maintained throughout the restitution curve (Figure 3), as were the regional variations in ARI across the ventricle. Mental stress reduced RV ERP from 228 ⫾ 23 to 221 ⫾ 21 (P o .001). The minimum ARI values observed at short diastolic intervals (ie, the shortest left-hand ARI on the restitution curve) decreased substantially in the LV endocardium (mean ARI: LVEndo 195 ⫾ 31 at rest to 182 ⫾ 32 during mental stress; P o .001), commensurate with the decrease in ERP. Less marked decreases in the minimum APDs at short coupling intervals were also observed in the LV epicardium (178 ⫾ 27 to 175 ⫾ 26 ms) and RV endocardium (156 ⫾ 11 to 153 ⫾ 12 ms). Comparisons of all ARIs at diastolic intervals within 20 ms of the shortest diastolic intervals confirmed this effect (Table 1). Maximal restitution curve slopes (Smax) were not significantly greater during stress in the LV endocardium or RV, but a slight increase in slope was observed in the epicardium (∂Smax ¼ þ0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.10; P o .01).

Alterations in the dispersion of repolarization Changes in the dynamic dispersion of repolarization in response to stress and to reductions in coupling intervals

Heart Rhythm, Vol 0, No 0, Month 2015 were examined. During steady-state pacing, no significant 358 change in dispersion of repolarization was observed across 359 all measured sites. A sharp increase in ventricular dispersion 360 of repolarization was observed during stress at coupling 361 intervals approaching ERP, which was not apparent during 362 baseline relaxation (dispersion: median 117 ms; range 363 63–192 ms). Short coupling intervals during stress, dispersion Q15 364 (median 140 ms; range 85–201 ms; Figure 4). Dispersion of F4365 repolarization at longer coupling intervals showed only minor 366 nonsignificant changes during mental stress. During mental 367 stress, dispersion of repolarization increased at short coupling 368 intervals to 127% ⫾ 22% of steady-state dispersion (P o .001; 369 Table 2). This was not observed during active relaxation, where T2370 no significant change in dispersion with premature beats 371 occurred (97% ⫾ 15%). Increases in the standard deviation 372 of repolarization times and in the interquartile ranges of 373 repolarization times also increased significantly (Table 2). 374 Apical-basal repolarization gradients were examined. 375 The increase in RV apical-basal gradients during stress at 376 short coupling intervals mirrored those observed across the 377 entire ventricle with an increase in dispersion to 115% ⫾ 378 56% of baseline (P o .001). However, absolute repolariza- 379 tion gradients across individual catheters were generally 380 small (mean RV 38 ms, LV endocardium 39 ms, and LV 381 epicardium 29 ms during active relaxation) and no consistent 382 change in gradients were observed within the LV or 383 epicardium during mental stress. 384 385 386 387 Arrhythmias associated with mental stress Only a single patient developed ventricular arrhythmia 388 during mental stress (anger recall stage) following a single 389 F5390 short-coupled S2 beat (Figure 5). The triggering PVC has a Q16 near-identical morphology to the paced beats, suggesting 391 that it arose close to the pacing site. The onset of the local 392 electrogram of this beat was later than the onset of the surface 393 depolarization, which would argue against catheter tip 394 pressure as a triggering factor. Although this may have been 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 Figure 3 Example of dynamic activation recovery interval (ARI) restitu410 tion curve taken from the left ventricular endocardium. A single electrical 411 restitution curve taken from the left ventricular endocardium is shown. 412 During stress, shorter ARIs are achieved along the entire restitution curve. 413 This is particularly evident at very short diastolic intervals, where ARIs are 414 markedly shorter than during active relaxation.

Finlay et al 415Q21 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471

Table 1


5

Comparison of all ARIs Mean ARI (ms) Steady state

Short diastolic interval

Site

Rest

Stress

P

Rest

Stress

P

LV endocardium LV epicardium RV endocardium

239 ⫾ 30 206 ⫾ 29 206 ⫾ 27

231 ⫾ 32 198 ⫾ 26 200 ⫾ 28

o.001 .02 o.005

208 ⫾ 18 186 ⫾ 12 165 ⫾ 8

199 ⫾ 16 173 ⫾ 10 161 ⫾ 13

o.001 o.001 .02

Calculated mean ARIs are shown during active relaxation and mental stress, both during steady-state pacing and at diastolic intervals within 20 ms to the minimum diastolic interval. P values are inferred from analysis of variance multilevel regression. LV ¼ left ventricular; RV ¼ right ventricular.

a chance finding, arrhythmia did not occur during the relaxation phase at any coupling interval. No other sustained arrhythmia was observed. No arrhythmia was induced at similar coupling intervals at rest.

Discussion This study demonstrates that marked changes in local myocardial activation and recovery can be induced and measured in people using mental stress protocols. The key findings are as follows: (1) the cardiac action potential shortens during mental stress to differing degrees within the LV endocardium, LV epicardium, and RV; (2) these reductions in action potential length are maintained throughout the electrical restitution curve; (3) a substantial reduction in minimum ARIs at short coupling intervals is observed during mental stress; and (4) the dispersion of repolarization

markedly increases at short coupling intervals during mental stress as compared to the relaxed state. An important and novel finding is that dispersion of repolarization was markedly increased exclusively at short coupling intervals during stress. ERP was reduced during stress, as shortest-coupled S2 beats were more premature during stress than at rest. Conduction across the heart is slowed following such closely coupled extrastimuli.13 The cumulative effects of conduction slowing and heterogeneity in APD restitution across the heart will act to increase the dispersion of repolarization at short coupling intervals as we observed. This resolves an apparent discrepancy in our observations; the cardiac chamber with the longest ARI (the LV endocardium) also exhibits the greatest reduction in ARI during mental stress. Although ARIs become closer across the heart during mental stress, the absolute dispersion of repolarization is also dependent on conduction across the heart. As ERP shortens, there is increased slowing of conduction at very short coupling intervals (conduction velocity restitution). The combined effects of shortening ARI near the stimulus site and increasing conduction slowing across the heart increase the repolarization dispersion of the most premature beats possible during stress. Indeed, conduction velocity restitution protects distant sites from short diastolic intervals and maximal restitution. Therefore at the shortest coupling intervals, ARI restitution acts maximally near the site of stimulation, yet distant sites never

Table 2

Dynamic dispersion of repolarization Dispersion (%) Short diastolic intervals

Steady state Variable Rest Figure 4 Dispersion of repolarization. The dynamics of total dispersion of repolarization obtained in 12 patients are shown, normalized to mean dispersion during steady-state pacing during active relaxation. Pacing interval (PI) is normalized to milliseconds above the effective refractory period (ERP). The shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals, calculated using LOESS (LOcal regrESSion) regression, and separation of these bands implies statistical significance. There is a significant increase in the dispersion of repolarization during stress as pacing intervals approach effective refractory period during stress, which is not present at rest (P o .001; see Table 2). Representative data from 1 patient are shown in the inset.

Total SD IQR

Stress

P

Rest

Stress

P

100 ⫾ 0 97 ⫾ 15 NS 94 ⫾ 21 127 ⫾ 22 o.001 100 ⫾ 0 92 ⫾ 16 NS 91 ⫾ 23 122 ⫾ 21 o.001 100 ⫾ 0 84 ⫾ 19 NS 84 ⫾ 38 113 ⫾ 27 o.001

Three measures of dispersion of repolarization are shown: absolute dispersion of repolarization, standard deviation (SD), and interquartile range (IQR). Values are normalized to individual patient steady-state values during active relaxation and represented as percentage. P values are inferred from analysis of variance multilevel regression. NS ¼ not significant.

472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 Q22 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528

6 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575Q17 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585


Figure 5 Arrhythmia induced during mental stress protocol. During the anger recall portion of the mental stress protocol in 1 patient, delivery of 1 programmed stimulus (S2) to the right ventricle induced 1.5 seconds of rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. No arrhythmia had been induced in this patient during programmed stimulation performed in the relaxation state.

experience very short diastolic intervals. The cumulative effect will be an increase in absolute dispersion of repolarization. Our finding of an increased apical-basal dispersion of repolarization at short coupling intervals during mental stress within the right ventricle supports this hypothesis. The increased dispersion of repolarization provides a plausible explanation for the arrhythmogenic consequences of mental stress. In the clinical laboratory it is a common observation that tachycardia induction may hinge on coupling intervals either side of a critical window of only a few milliseconds. The stress-induced alterations in refractoriness we observed (median 7-ms reduction in ERP) might be sufficient to enable a spontaneous ventricular ectopic beat to initiate wavebreak, reentry, and clinical arrhythmia under stress but not under resting conditions. Such an ectopic would be an isolated event during resting conditions. In our study, a single VE with a coupling interval of 225 ms was seen to trigger an unstable ventricular arrhythmia, but the same paced coupling interval during resting conditions had previously not been arrhythmogenic. Of course, this isolated event may be attributable to chance. An increased spatial dispersion of repolarization has previously been shown to be arrhythmogenic in animal and computer models.16,17 Preexisting heterogeneities in repolarization and conduction (eg, in the periscar region around an old infarct) would likely be amplified by autonomic changes, and repolarization gradients increased.

Our observation that shorter APDs occurred at short diastolic intervals is relevant to the temporal correlation of arrhythmias with mental stress. This degree of shortening of 13 ms in the LV endocardium at short coupling intervals is 1.6-fold of that observed in the steady state. Thus, the dynamic changes induced by closely coupled beats amplify mental stress effects on both APD and repolarization gradients. The changes in ARI observed in this study were greater than those in a previous study using movie clips to induce mental stress in patients with atrial fibrillation.6 This may be attributed to more effective induction of mental stress, a younger patient cohort without previously frequent arrhythmias, and naivety to antiarrhythmic medications in the present study. The minimal APD (the leftmost point on the restitution curve) is considered one of the most important factors in determining organization of the excitation pattern of ventricular fibrillation and in the stability of reentrant.18,19 The shortened APDs at short diastolic intervals during mental stress is linked to ventricular arrhythmias being more likely to degenerate to fibrillation under stressful conditions. Thus, a premature extrasystole may be more likely to trigger ventricular fibrillation in a predisposed patient during mental stress. This is in keeping with previous observations20,21 that ventricular arrhythmias were more easily inducible and persisted for longer time during mental stress in patients undergoing programmed electrical stimulation via implanted defibrillators.

586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642

Finlay et al 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699


We did not observe a marked increase in the maximal slope of APD restitution during mental stress. This contrasts with previous work from our group,5 where a significant increase in restitution slope during isoprenaline administration in humans was observed. Our finding may be accounted for by the induction of more subtle increases in intrinsic sympathetic activity through mental stress vs the use of incremental isoprenaline and adrenaline infusions. Whereas administration of sympathomimetic drugs can be expected to have a global effect on cardiac electrophysiology, the highly regional and complex innervation of the cardiac autonomics can give rise to functional asymmetry during cardiac autonomic stimulation.22 Intrinsic autonomic stimulation is expected to involve both parasympathetic and sympathetic components, whose multifaceted effects may be simultaneously complimentary and divergent. While pure adrenergic stimulation may shorten APD and steepen restitution curves, the alterations in sympathetic and parasympathetic balance may allow restitution curves not to steepen at short coupling intervals. The exact reasons underlying differences in restitution between cardiac chambers are not clear, and several mechanisms could be involved. These include regional variability in ion channel expression and function23,24 and local interaction with mechanoelectric feedback in response to sympathetically mediated changes in myocardial contraction,25 as well as regional differences in autonomic innervation, which could modulate both ARI and maximal restitution slope.26 Whatever the underlying mechanisms, regional differences in repolarization and hence refractoriness are likely to be proarrhythmic by facilitating functional block and reentry.

Strengths and limitations This study is the first to directly assess dynamic human cardiac electrophysiology during mental stress induction. A particular strength is that it was performed in individuals with essentially normal hearts and without medication. It thus provides an important benchmark of the normal electrophysiological response to mental stress in humans. However, further study is necessary to confirm that these effects are critical in patients with known predisposition to arrhythmia. Several limitations exist. First, the invasive procedure used to measure cardiac electrophysiology is liable to cause anxiety in itself. Anxiolytic agents would of course be liable to affect the results of the study and make stress induction difficult or impossible. Although the active relaxation protocol was chosen specifically to address this, it is likely a background anxiety remained. Ideally a measure of sympathetic stress response would have been included, for example, serum catetcholamines, and this was not performed. However, this would not have influenced the interpretation of our findings. The mental arithmetic protocol was followed by anger recall; the more structured and impersonal nature of the arithmetic protocol was found to be more reliably administered

7

during the invasive electrophysiological study during “test runs” and hence the order chosen. However, had it been possible to administer anger recall to all patients, higher maximal stress would have occurred. The measurement of within-chamber dispersion of repolarization was limited by the relatively small area of myocardium covered in either the LV endocardium or the LV epicardium. Our study was performed without global high-resolution 3dimensional mapping technology, which would certainly aid examination of endocardial apical-basal repolarization gradients. This may be addressed more fully in a future study. We did not expect arrhythmia to occur as a result of our protocol during the study. Although the observation of an episode of (nonsustained) polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient during the stress protocol lends credence to the assertion that mental stress can be proarrhythmic, this single instance can only be viewed as being circumstantial evidence, since neither its reproducibility nor its generalizability could be assessed.

700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 Conclusion 721 Conscious mental stress induces measurable and significant 722 changes in dynamic electrophysiology across the human 723 heart. These changes may underlie the mechanism of the 724 promotion of arrhythmia during mental stress. 725 726 727 References Q18 728 1. Lampert R, Shusterman V, Burg M, McPherson C, Batsford W, Goldberg A, Soufer R. Anger-induced T-wave alternans predicts future ventricular arrhyth729 mias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 730 2009;XX:774–778. 731 2. Abisse SS, Lampert R, Burg M, Soufer R, Shusterman V. Cardiac repolarization instability during psychological stress in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. 732 J Electrocardiol 2011;XX:678–683. 733 3. Lampert R, Soufer R, McPherson CA, Batsford WP, Tirado S, Earley C, 734 Goldberg A, Shusterman V. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks increase T-wave alternans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;XX:512–517. 735 4. Krantz DS, Quigley JF, O’Callahan M. Mental stress as a trigger of acute cardiac 736 events: the role of laboratory studies. Ital Heart J 2001;XX:895–899. 737 5. Taggart P, Sutton P, Chalabi Z, Boyett MR, Simon R, Elliott D, Gill JS. Effect of adrenergic stimulation on action potential duration restitution in humans. 738 Circulation 2003;XX:285–289. 739 6. Child N, Hanson B, Bishop M, Rinaldi CA, Bostock J, Western D, Cooklin M, 740 O’Neil M, Wright M, Razavi R, Gill J, Taggart P. Effect of mental challenge induced by movie clips on action potential duration in normal human subjects 741 Q19 independent of heart rate. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014. XX:XX–XX. 742 7. Burg MM, Jain D, Soufer R, Kerns RD, Zaret BL. Role of behavioral and 743 psychological factors in mental stress-induced silent left ventricular dysfunction in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;XX:440–448. 744 8. Callister R, Suwarno NO, Seals DR. Sympathetic activity is influenced by task 745 difficulty and stress perception during mental challenge in humans. J Physiol 746 1992;XX:373–387. 9. Potse M, Vinet A, Opthof T, Coronel R. Validation of a simple model for the 747 morphology of the T wave in unipolar electrograms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 748 Physiol 2009;XX:H792–H801. 749 10. Haws CW, Lux RL. Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms: effects of inter750 ventions that alter repolarization time. Circulation 1990;XX:281–288. 751 11. Yue AM, Paisey JR, Robinson S, Betts TR, Roberts PR, Morgan JM. Determination 752 of human ventricular repolarization by noncontact mapping: validation with monophasic action potential recordings. Circulation 2004;XX:1343–1350. 753 12. Wyatt RF, Burgess MJ, Evans AK, Lux RL, Abildskov JA, Tsutsumi T. 754 Estimation of ventricular transmembrane action potential durations and 755 repolarization times from unipolar electrograms [abstract]. Am J Cardiol 1981; XX:488. 756

8 757 758 Q20 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786


13. Finlay MC, Xu L, Nobles M, Lane J, Lowe M, Ben-Simon R, Bhar-Amato J, Hussain Q, Sebastian S, Taggart P, Tinker A, Lambiase PD. Effects of mental stress on cardiac electrophysiology: a parallel human & murine study. POSTER SESSION 2, HRC 2013. Europace 2013;XX:iv31–iv35. 14. Ogawa S, Furuno I, Satoh Y, Yoh S, Saeki K, Sadanaga T, Katoh H, Nakamura Y. Quantitative indices of dispersion of refractoriness for identification of propensity to re-entrant ventricular tachycardia in a canine model of myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 1991;XX:378–383. 15. Burton FL, Cobbe SM. Dispersion of ventricular repolarization and refractory period. Cardiovasc Res 2001;XX:10–23. 16. Antzelevitch C. Drug-induced spatial dispersion of repolarization. Cardiol J 2008;XX:100–121. 17. Gilmour RF Jr, Gelzer AR, Otani NF. Cardiac electrical dynamics: maximizing dynamical heterogeneity. J Electrocardiol 2007;XX:S51–S55. 18. Ten Tusscher KH, Hren R, Panfilov AV. Organization of ventricular fibrillation in the human heart. Circ Res 2007;XX:e87–e101. 19. Bingen BO, Askar SFA, Schalij MJ, Kazbanov MJ IV, Ypey DL, Panfilov AV, Pijnappels DA. Prolongation of minimal action potential duration in sustained fibrillation decreases complexity by transient destabilization. Cardiovasc Res 2013;XX:161–170.

20. Lampert R, Jain D, Burg MM, Batsford WP, McPherson CA. Destabilizing effects of mental stress on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation 2000;XX:158–164. 21. Stopper M, Joska T, Burg MM, Batsford WP, McPherson CA, Jain D, Lampert R. Electrophysiologic characteristics of anger-triggered arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2007;XX:268–273. 22. Critchley HD, Taggart P, Sutton PM, Holdright DR, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, Malik M, Dolan RJ. Mental stress and sudden cardiac death: asymmetric midbrain activity as a linking mechanism. Brain 2005;XX:75–85. 23. Gaborit N, Le Bouter S, Szuts V, Varro A, Escande D, Nattel S, Demolombe S. Regional and tissue specific transcript signatures of ion channel genes in the nondiseased human heart. J Physiol 2007;XX:675–693. 24. Sivagangabalan G, Nazzari H, Bignolais O, et al. Regional ion channel gene expression heterogeneity and ventricular fibrillation dynamics in human hearts. PLoS One 2014;XX:e82179. 25. Pfeiffer ER, Tangney JR, Omens JH, McCulloch AD. Biomechanics of cardiac electromechanical coupling and mechanoelectric feedback. J Biomech Eng 2014; XX:021007. 26. Shen MJ, Zipes DP. Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res 2014;XX:1004–1021.

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES This article describes the significant reductions in action potential durations that can be induced in the human heart by mental stress. This was measured directly during invasive electrophysiological studies in patients with essentially normal hearts and free of medication. We demonstrate for the first time that interactions between this and closely coupled premature extrastimuli can lead to markedly increased dispersion of repolarization during stress. This provides a fertile proarrhythmic substrate that may explain the promotion of arrhythmia by mental stress. Knowledge of these dynamics helps us understand the temporal relation of arrhythmia to external conscious stimuli and provides a mechanism by which neurostimulation and modulation might be helpful as a therapeutic tool. Future studies will better define whether such mechanisms can be directly harnessed in patients with underlying cardiac disease to treat and prevent arrhythmia.

787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815