Effects of synbiotic containing Lactobacillus plantarum ...

2 downloads 0 Views 361KB Size Report
Based on the findings, probiotic + GOS were selected as synbiotic to evaluate if it could promote ... mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) are commonly used prebiotics and ...... survival and implantation of live microbial dietary supplements in the.
DOI: 10.1111/are.13701

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effects of synbiotic containing Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 and galactooligosaccharide on the growth performance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei Truong-Giang Huynh1,2 | Chia-Chun Chi1 | Thanh-Phuong Nguyen2 | Tran-Thi-Thanh Hien Tran2 | Ann-Chang Cheng3 | Chun-Hung Liu1,4 1 Department of Aquaculture, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan

Abstract This study aimed to develop a synbiotic combination with probiotic, Lactobacillus

2

College of Aquaculture and Fisheries, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam 3 Department and Graduate Institute of Aquaculture, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 4

Research Center for Animal biologics, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan

plantarum 7–40 and one of three prebiotics, fructooligosaccharide (FOS), galactooligosaccharide (GOS) and mannan oligosaccharide (MOS). The best in vitro growth was observed when probiotic was cultured in the medium containing either FOS or GOS as the sole of carbon source. The analysis of enzyme activity revealed that GOS induced the highest activities of protease and b-galactosidase of probiotic. Based on the findings, probiotic + GOS were selected as synbiotic to evaluate if it could promote the growth of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. For this, four

Correspondence Chun-Hung Liu, Department of Aquaculture, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan. Email: [email protected] and Ann-Chang Cheng, Department of Aquaculture, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Email: [email protected] Funding information Ministry of Science and Technology, ROC, Grant/Award Number: MOST 104-2313-B020-006-MY3

diets, including a basal diet with no GOS or probiotic (control), 0.4% GOS (PRE), 108 CFU probiotic kg otic kg

1

1

(PRO) and 0.4% GOS in combination with 108 CFU probi-

(SYN), were fed to shrimp for 60 days, and then the growth performance,

intestinal microbiota (including total Vibrio counts, VBCs; and lactic acid bacteria, LAB) and digestive enzyme (including protease, leu-aminopeptidase and b-galactosidase) were evaluated. The weight gain (WG) of shrimp fed the PRO did not significantly differ from those of control (p > .05). Shrimp fed the SYN had significantly higher WG compared with the other treatments (p < .05). In addition, the SYN-fed shrimp had significantly higher LAB and protease, leu-aminopeptidase and b-galactosidase activity (p < .05). The lowest presumptive Vibrio count (VBC) was also observed in intestines of SYN-fed shrimp. Therefore, we suggested that Lac. plantarum 7–40+ GOS can be used as a synergistic synbiotic for shrimp culture. KEYWORDS

growth, Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40, Litopenaeus vannamei, prebiotic, synbiotic

1 | INTRODUCTION

been widely used in intensive white shrimp culture to improve the feed value and digestion efficacy, which contribute to feed efficiency

According to recent investigations, feed costs in intensive culture of

and growth improvements (Kongnum & Hongpattarakere, 2012; Liu,

white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, may reach 68% of total produc-

Chiu, Ho, & Wang, 2009; Wang, 2007; Zhang et al., 2012; Zokaeifar

tion costs (Hung & Quy, 2013). Indeed, shrimp farmers desire to

et al., 2012).

minimize the costs of production in which feed cost is of the great-

Synbiotics, a combination of prebiotics and probiotics, have been

est concern (Hoseinifar, Zare, & Merrifeld, 2010). Among practical

used since 2005 (Panigrahi et al., 2005). Synbiotics have been widely

approaches, supplements such as prebiotics and probiotics have

applied and are assumed to be growth- and immunity-promoting

Aquaculture Research. 2018;1–13.

wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/are

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

|

1

2

|

HUYNH

ET AL.

factors in freshwater fish (Azimirad, Meshkini, Ahmadifard, &

diet could promote the immune responses and disease resistance of

Hoseinifar, 2016; Hoseinifar, Dadar, & Ringø, 2017; Hoseinifar, Este-

L. vannamei, but no growth-promoting effect of probiotic was found

ban, Cuesta, & Sun, 2015; Hoseinifar, Mirvaghefi, Amoozegar, Merri-

(Chiu, Guu, Liu, Pan, & Cheng, 2007). However, we believed that the

field, & Ringø, 2017) and marine fish (Ai et al., 2011; Reyes-Becerril

combination of Lac. plantarum with a selected prebiotic would

et al., 2014). It is surprising that although growth-enhancing effect

induce higher growth rates of L. vannamei compared to the single

of synbiotics on the growth of fish is well documented, little infor-

form. Therefore, the first aim of this study was to determine the

mation was reported in cultured Penaeid shrimp. In fact, several pre-

best synbiotic combination between Lac. plantarum 7–40 and three

vious studies reported that synbiotics decreased the prevalence of

different prebiotics, including MOS, FOS and GOS. The second aim

intestinal pathogenic bacteria of Vibrio spp. and increased immune

was to assess the in vivo effects of Lac. plantarum 7–40, GOS and

responses and disease resistance against Vibrio alginolyticus and

Lac. plantarum 7–40+ GOS on growth performance, production of

white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in L. vannamei and Kuruma

digestive enzymes and intestinal microbiota of L. vannamei.

shrimp, Penaeus japonicas (Li, Tan, & Mai, 2009; Zhang et al., 2011). Meanwhile, a study by Partida-Arangure, Luna-Gonzalez, Fierro-Coronado, Flores-Miranda and Gonzalez-Ocampo (2013) reported that a synbiotic did not affect the growth of L. vannamei. Synbiotics are perceived as single products in which a probiotic and prebiotic work together and beneficially affect the host (Lauzon,

2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1 | Preparations of prebiotics, probiotics and L. vannamei

Dimitroglou, Merrifield, Ringø, & Davies, 2014). Kolida and Gibson

Commercial prebiotic products used in this study including MOS

(2011) stated that both synergistic and complementary synbiotic

from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), FOS and GOS were purchased

approaches should be considered when applying synbiotics in animal

from Carbosynth Ltd. (Old Station Business Park, Compton, UK). The

science. The synergistic effect of a probiotic is chosen based on its

probiotic was the Lac. plantarum 7–40 strain (Chiu et al., 2007). The

effects on the host, and the prebiotic must specifically stimulate the

probiotic bacterium was kept at

growth and enzyme activities of the probiotic. In addition, the probi-

growth in De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth (DifcoTM Labora-

otic can directly activate digestive enzyme activities in the hep-

tories, Sparks, MD, USA) at 37°C. For experimental shrimp, 104

atopancreas of shrimp, can serve as a provider of exogenous

L. vannamei postlarvae were obtained from a private shrimp hatchery

enzymes, and assist in making food more digestible (Liu et al., 2009).

in Linyuan, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Shrimp were acclimated and reared

Therefore, the combination of a prebiotic and probiotic may lead to

in a cement tank with a capacity of 15 m3 filled with 20& brackish

higher health benefits to shrimp.

water. Shrimp were fed a commercial shrimp diet (Lee-Hye, Ping-

Fructooligosaccharide (FOS), galactooligosaccharide (GOS) and

80°C and revitalized by overnight

tung, Taiwan) twice daily until ready for the experiment.

mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) are commonly used prebiotics and were recently applied in aquaculture as additives (reviewed by Ringø et al., 2010). These compounds have also been used as parts of syn-

2.2 | Experimental design

biotics to improve the growth of fish (Hoseinifar, Hoseini, & Bagheri,

This study encompassed in vitro and in vivo trials. In the in vitro trial,

2017; Hoseinifar, Mirvaghefi et al., 2017; Modanloo, Soltanian, Akh-

prebiotics were screened to establish a relevant synbiotic in combina-

laghi, & Hoseinifar, 2017; Rodriguez-Estrada, Satoh, Haga, Fushimi,

tion with the probiotic Lac. plantarum 7–40. Prebiotics, including FOS,

& Sweetman, 2009; Zhang et al., 2015). However, their effects of

GOS and MOS, were first screened based on the growth of the probi-

improving the growth of L. vannamei remain a subject of intense

otic Lac. plantarum 7–40 by culturing in different media containing 2%

debate. For instance Zhang et al. (2012) revealed that dietary MOS

of the prebiotic. Prebiotics which showed the highest growth-enhan-

at 2%~4% improved the growth performance of L. vannamei,

cing effect on Lac. plantarum 7–40 were examined for ability to induce

whereas Li et al. (2007) found no effect when using FOS. Therefore,

bacterial enzyme activities, including protease, leu-aminopeptidase

it is recommended that instead of probiotic alone, several prebiotics,

and b-galactosidase. In addition, the selected prebiotics were also

such as FOS, GOS and MOS, should be jointly used to improve the

investigated for supporting the growth of pathogenic bacteria, includ-

survivability and implantation of the targeted probiotic in the intes-

ing V. alginolyticus (Liu, Cheng, Hsu, & Chen, 2004) and V. para-

tine, and confer the health benefits in shrimp. However, prebiotics

haemolyticus (Yeh, Chiu, Shiu, Huang, & Liu, 2014), as references.

may be utilized via diverse mechanisms dependent on sugar linkages

GOS, which was able to induce higher production of enzyme activity

and the bacterial strain; therefore, an in vitro test for optimal combi-

of a probiotic and exhibited significantly lower support for the growth

nation between probiotic and prebiotic must be done prior to

of pathogenic bacteria, was used to formulate a synbiotic with

in vivo test in shrimp (Huynh et al., 2017).

Lac. plantarum 7–40 and was incorporated in the diets of shrimp,

Among Lactobacillus species, Lactobacillus plantarum is known to

including 0.4% GOS (PRE), Lac. plantarum 7–40 at 108 colony-forming

produce proteolytic and glycoside hydrolase enzymes that aid pro-

units (CFU)/kg (PRO), synbiotic (0.4% GOS/Lac. plantarum 7–40 at

tein and carbohydrate digestion, and is used as a probiotic (Cebeci &

108 CFU/kg, SYN) and a basal diet control (no prebiotic or probiotic)

Gurakan, 2003; Macedo, Tavares, & Malcata, 2003; Marathe &

in the second experiment. The level of probiotic used in the experi-

Ghosh, 2009), such as the Lac. plantarum 7–40 used as probiotic in

mental diets is according to Chiu et al. (2007), and Lac. plantarum

HUYNH

|

ET AL.

3

7–40 at 108 CFU/kg + 0.4% GOS (SYN). After 60 days of feeding, the

containing 95 ml of m-MRS (Table 1), and then each culture was dis-

survival rate, growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and

tributed in several aliquots to 15-ml sterile tubes. Growth of

intestinal microbiota of shrimp were evaluated.

Lac. plantarum 7–40 in each culture was observed by examining the OD600 at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr, using a spectrophotometer (Jasco V-630, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan). pH values were also recorded

2.3 | In vitro studies for establishing a synergistic synbiotic

as an indirect parameter of growth and sugar metabolism using a pH metre (Suntex SP-2100, Taipei, Taiwan). Each sample was run in triplicate.

2.3.1 | Screening of the prebiotics FOS, GOS and MOS for synbiotic preparation The evaluation of prebiotic utilization by Lac. plantarum 7–40 was modified based on the method of Cebeci and Gurakan (2003); Rur-

2.3.3 | Inducing growth of pathogenic bacteria by prebiotics

angwa et al. (2009); Hoseinifar, Mirvaghefi et al. (2017). Lactobacillus

Prebiotics, including FOS and GOS, were used as the sole or carbon

plantarum 7–40 was first cultured in MRS broth for 24 hr at 37°C,

sources to assess the growth of V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyti-

then centrifuged at 3,000 9 g for 10 min at 4°C. Subsequently, the

cus under aerobic culture condition. The method was the same as

bacterium was washed twice and re-suspended in modified MRS

described in Section 2.3.2. Bacteria were cultured on medium (VM)

broth without sugar (m-MRS-no sugar) (Table 1). The bacterium was

containing 1.7% tryptone (a pancreatic digest of casein), 2% sodium

then streaked onto m-MRS agar that contained 2% of a prebiotic

chloride, 0.25% dipotassium hydrogen phosphate and 2% of a prebi-

(FOS, GOS or MOS) with bromcresol purple (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint

otic at 27°C (with the prebiotic as the sole carbon source). Media

Louis, MO, USA) as an indicator. Prebiotic utilization was observed as

containing 2% glucose and no sugar, respectively, served as the posi-

a change in the colour of the medium surrounding the colonies from

tive and negative controls. The growth of bacteria in each culture

purple to yellow.

was also observed as the OD600 at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr. Each sample was run in triplicate.

2.3.2 | Growth stimulation of Lac. plantarum 7–40 by prebiotics

2.3.4 | Assessment of prebiotic scores

A Lac. plantarum 7–40 cell suspension was prepared as described

According to a definition given by Huebner, Wehling and Hutkins

above. Five microlitres of each cell suspension was added to bottles

(2007), the prebiotic score reflects the ability of a given substrate to

T A B L E 1 Ingredients of modified De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe broth and modified De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar media (g 100 ml Ingredients

m-MRS-glucose††

m-MRS-no sugar†

m-MRS-FOS

m-MRS-GOS

1

m-MRS-MOS

m-MRS broth composition Proteose peptone No.3

1

1

1

1

1

Beef extract

1

1

1

1

1

Yeast extract

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Polysorbate 80

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Ammonium citrate

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Magnesium sulphate

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

Manganese sulphate

0.005

0.005

0.005

0.005

0.005

Dipotassium phosphate

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Glucose

2

FOS

2

GOS

2

MOS Distilled water

2 100

100

100

100

100

m-MRS agar consists of the same above ingredients with L-Cystein

0.1

Agar

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

Bromcresol purple

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003

FOS, fructooligosaccharide; GOS, galactooligosaccharide; MOS, mannan oligosaccharide; m-MRS, modified De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe. The ingredients were following composition from Difco, Laboratories. Symbols represent negative control (†) and positive control (††).

)

4

|

HUYNH

ET AL.

support the growth of a targeted bacterium relative to the indige-

bacterial suspension. The absorbance change at 410 nm was moni-

nous intestinal flora and is relative to its growth on glucose. Carbo-

tored at 37°C for 1 hr. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as

hydrates have a positive prebiotic score if they (i) are metabolized as

the amount of enzyme which produces L lmol of p-NA per hour at

well as glucose by the probiotic strain and (ii) are selectively metabo-

37°C.

lized by the probiotic but not by pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, in

The method for b-galactosidase activity was based on Vinderola

this study, the prebiotic with a higher prebiotic score supported

and Reinheimer (2003) with slight modifications. Lactobacillus plan-

good growth of Lac. plantarum 7–40. A negative prebiotic score was

tarum 7–40 cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 9 g for

obtained if Lac. plantarum 7–40 grew less on the prebiotic compared

10 min at 4°C and then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline

with that on glucose and/or had less growth on the prebiotic than

(PBS, pH 7.0). Cells were re-suspended in PBS, and then the OD560

the growth of pathogenic bacteria on the prebiotic.

was measured. One millilitre of the cell suspension was permeabilized

Assessment of the prebiotic scores for FOS and GOS was modi-

with 50 ll of a toluene: acetone (1:9 v/v) solution, vortexed for 7 min

fied based on the method of Mazzola, Aloisio, Biavati and Gioia

and immediately assayed for b-galactosidase activity. One hundred

(2015). Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 was cultured in m-MRS with 2%

millilitres of sample was placed in a tube containing 900 ll of PBS, and

glucose or 2% of the prebiotic as the sole carbon source. Similarly, a

then 200 ll of o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) at a con-

bacterium V. alginolyticus or V. parahaemolyticus was also prepared

centration of 4 mg/ml was added. Tubes were placed in a water bath

by growing on VM with 2% glucose or 2% of the prebiotic. For the

(37°C) for 15 min, and 0.5 ml of 1 M Na2CO3 was added to stop the

enteric mixture, each V. alginolyticus or V. parahaemolyticus strain

reaction, followed by recording the OD420 and OD560. b-Galactosidase

was cultured on VM with 2% glucose and then mixed in a 1:1 ratio

activity is expressed in Miller units. The specific activity of the enzyme

and inoculated (20 ml/L) on VM containing 2% glucose or 2% of the

is presented in units/mg protein, and total soluble protein was deter-

prebiotic. Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 culture was incubated at

mined using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit with bovine serum albumin

37°C, whereas the cultures of V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus

(BSA) as the standard (Bradford, 1976).

and the enteric mixture were incubated at 27°C. OD600 values were recorded at 0 and 24 hr. Each culture was run in triplicate. The prebiotic score was calculated as follows: Prebiotic score = ([OD600 of Lac. plantarum 7–40 on the prebiotic at 24 hr

OD600 of Lac. plantarum 7–40 on the prebiotic at

2.4 | Effects of the synbiotics on shrimp growth 2.4.1 | Preparation of diets

OD600

Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 was cultured in a sterilized 2-L flask

of Lac. plantarum 7–40 on glucose at 0 hr]) – ([OD600 of pathogenic

and harvested by centrifugation as described above. The pelleted

bacteria on the prebiotic at 24 hr

bacterial cells were mixed with skim milk at a ratio of 1:4 and stored

0 hr]/[OD600 of Lac. plantarum 7–40 on glucose at 24 hr

OD600 of pathogenic bacteria

on the prebiotic at 0 hr]/[OD600 of pathogenic bacteria on glucose

at

at 24 hr

homogenized into a probiotic powder. The viability of the bacterium

OD600 of pathogenic bacteria on glucose at 0 hr]).

80°C. The frozen sample was dried in a freeze-dryer and then

was determined by plate counting on MRS agar. After determining the viability, the experimental diets were prepared according to Liu

2.3.5 | Evaluation of the effect of prebiotics on enzyme activity of Lac. plantarum 7–40

et al. (2009). The basal diet was formulated to be sufficient to support the optimal growth of L. vannamei (Table 2). GOS and probiotic

Lactobacillus plantarum 7–40 was cultured in m-MRS medium con-

powder containing Lac. plantarum 7–40 at 108 CFU/g were added to

taining 2% FOS or 2% GOS. The culture with glucose served as a

the test diets with respective decreases in the amounts of cellulose

control group. After 24 hr of incubation, cultures were used to mea-

and skim milk. Four dietary treatments were tested: 0.4% GOS (w/

sure the protease, leu-aminopeptidase and b-galactosidase enzyme

w) (PRE); Lac. plantarum 7–40 at a dose of 108 CFU/kg of feed

activities. Each sample was run in triplicate. The protease activity

(PRO); synbiotic (0.4% GOS + Lac. plantarum 7–40 at 108 CFU/kg of

was assayed at 40°C in 100 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.0) (Liu

feed, SYN); and the control diet (no GOS or Lac. plantarum 7–40).

et al., 2009). The culture (100 ll) was incubated with 100 ll of a 1%

The ingredients were ground in a hammer mill to pass through a 60-

casein solution (prepared in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.0) for 10 min at

mesh screen. Experimental diets were prepared by mixing the dry

37°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 ll of 5% (v/v) tri-

ingredients with fish oil, and then water was added until a stiff

chloroacetic acid. After 20 min, the contents were centrifuged at

dough resulted. Each diet was then passed through a mincer with a

3000 9 g and 4°C for 20 min, and the supernatant was measured

die, and the resulting spaghetti-like strings were dried at room tem-

by a modified Lowry’s method. One unit of protease was equivalent

perature to a moisture level of