www.nature.com/scientificreports
OPEN
Published: xx xx xxxx
Author Correction: Environmental and anthropogenic factors affecting the increasing occurrence of sharkhuman interactions around a fastdeveloping Indian Ocean island Erwann Lagabrielle1,2, Agathe Allibert3,4, Jeremy J. Kiszka 5, Nicolas Loiseau6, James P. Kilfoil5 & Anne Lemahieu1,7 Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21553-0, published online 27 February 2018 The original version of this Article contained errors. In the Abstract, “Since 1988, 86% of shark bite events on ocean-users involved surfers off the leeward coast, where 96% of surfing activities took place.” now reads: “Since 1988, 86% of shark bite events on surfers involved ocean-users off the leeward coast, where 96% of surfing activities took place.” In the Results, “Of the 43 shark bite events, 67% involved surfers (n = 29), with the remaining 43% involving swimmers (n = 5), spear fishers (n = 5), windsurfers (n = 2), a gillnet fisher (n = 1), and a kayaker (n = 1; Fig. 2a).” now reads: “Of the 43 shark bite events, 67% involved surfers (n = 29), with the remaining 33% involving swimmers (n = 5), spear fishers (n = 5), windsurfers (n = 2), a gillnet fisher (n = 1), and a kayaker (n = 1; Fig. 2a).” “However, this proportion reaches 69% for surfers (Fig. 2b).” now reads:
1
UMR 228 ESPACE-DEV, Université de La Réunion, IRD, Parc Technologique Universitaire, 2 rue Joseph Wetzell CS 41095, 97495, Sainte-Clotilde Cedex, France. 2Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa. 3UMR PVBMT, Université de La Réunion, Pôle de Protection des Plantes, 7 Chemin de l’IRAT, 97410, Saint-Pierre, France. 4Groupe de recherche en épidémiologie des zoonoses et santé publique (GREZOSP), Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Rue Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 2M2, Canada. 5Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 3000 NE 151 St., FL, 33181, North Miami, USA. 6UMR 9175 MARBEC, IRD-CNRS-IFREMER-UM, Université de Montpellier, 34095, Montpellier, France. 7Department of Anthropology and department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Sciences, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown, South Africa. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to E.L. (email:
[email protected]) Scientific REpOrts | (2018) 8:10303 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28406-w
1
www.nature.com/scientificreports/ “However, this proportion reaches 64% for non-surfers (Fig. 2b).” Finally, in the Discussion, “The CFR of 46% for all users and 35% for surfers is very high compared to other countries, such as Australia” now reads: “The CFR of 42% for all users and 31% for surfers is very high compared to other countries, such as Australia” These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2018
Scientific REpOrts | (2018) 8:10303 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28406-w
2
